Professional Documents
Culture Documents
[1976]3SCR12
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Civil Appeal Nos. 1727-1728 of 1969
Decided On: 18.12.1975
Appellants:Rohtas Industries Ltd. and Ors.
Vs.
Respondent:Rohtas Industries Staff Union and Ors.
Hon'ble Judges/Coram:
A.C. Gupta, V.R. Krishna Iyer and Y.V. Chandrachud, JJ.
Counsels:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: A.B.N. Sinha, B.P. Maheshwari and Suresh Sethi, Advs
For Respondents/Defendant: B.C. Ghose, S.S. Jauhar, D.N. Pandey, A. Sinha and Deba
Prasad Mukherjee, Advs.
Case Note:
Labour and Industrial - compensation - Section 10-A of Industrial Disputes
Act, 1947 - there was strike in the industry - parties agreed to refer dispute to
arbitration - employees claimed wages for period of strike while employer
claimed compensation for losses suffered during strike - arbitrator held
employees guilty and asked them to make payment to management - High
Court reversed Order - if disputes related to enforcement of right remedy is
adjudication under Act - compensation for loss of business not related to
employment, non employment or terms of employment or with condition of
labour - therefore dispute in question not an industrial dispute within
meaning of Act - reference under Section.10-A is restricted to present or
apprehending industrial disputes - reference to arbitration under Section 10-A
was not valid and so the Award.
JUDGMENT
V.R. Krishna Iyer, J.
1. We permit ourselves a few preliminary observations disturbingly induced by the not
altogether untypical circumstances of these two appeals, before proceeding to state the
facts, set out the submissions and decide the points.
2 . Industrial law in India has not fully lived up to the current challenges of industrial
life, both in the substantive norms or regulations binding the three parties-the State.
Management and Labour and in the processual system which has baulked, by dawdling
dysfunction, early finality and prompt remedy in a sensitive area where quick solution is
of the very essence of real justice. The legislative and judicial processes have promises
to keep if positive industrial peace; in tune with distributive economic justice and
continuity of active production, were to be accomplished. The architects of these
processes will, we hopefully expect, fabricate creative changes in the system normative
and adjectival.