Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Diabetes Mellitus
Introduction
Diabetes mellitus is a chronic metabolic disturbance characterized by fasting and/or postprandial
hyperglycemia. Rather than a single disease entity, diabetes mellitus is a heterogeneous syndrome
that is caused by an absolute or relative lack of insulin, resistance to the action of insulin, or both.
Dysglycemia is a term that describes abnormal blood glucose levels without a definite threshold. The
term reflects current evidence that minor degrees of blood glucose abnormalities, even those that do
not meet the diagnostic threshold for diabetes mellitus, are still associated with increased
cardiovascular risk.[1]
Long-term diabetes mellitus may lead to complications that involve the small blood vessels
(microangiopathy), large blood vessels (macroangiopathy) and nerves (neuropathy) of multiple organs
and systems. Because diabetes is associated with significant dysfunction of numerous metabolic
pathways, clinicians must pay close attention to factors such as hypertension and dyslipidemia in
addition to blood glucose. Heart disease is the most common cause of death in patients with
diabetes.[2]
Classification
diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is due to autoimmune beta cell destruction resulting in an absolute
deficiency of insulin. T1DM usually presents with acute metabolic symptoms of relatively short
duration in a child, adolescent or young adult. If untreated, ketoacidosis may occur. Although onset of
T1DM is not common after 30 years of age, some older individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus may
develop markers of autoimmunity and progress quickly to an insulin-dependent state. In North
America, T1DM accounts for 5–10% of all patients with diabetes.
diabetes mellitus (T2DM) manifests primarily as insulin resistance along with some degree of
insulin deficiency. Over time, insulin deficiency worsens, resulting in more prominent hyperglycemia.
T2DM is commonly discovered incidentally, or is diagnosed in adults who are often obese and have
nonspecific symptoms. T2DM makes up 90% of all cases of diabetes mellitus and the prevalence is
rising rapidly, particularly in certain ethnic groups, both in Canada and worldwide. It is also being
diagnosed more frequently and earlier in obese children and adolescents.
Other specific causes of diabetes mellitus include the monogenetic syndromes such as maturity-onset
diabetes of the young (MODY), or are a result of pancreatic diseases (Type 3c), infectious agents,
drugs, pancreatic surgery or other diseases leading to carbohydrate intolerance. Drugs that can
perturb blood glucose levels and interfere with glycemic control in patients with diabetes are
presented in Table 1.
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 1/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
Pentamidine
Protease inhibitors, e.g., amprenavir, atazanavir, darunavir, fosamprenavir, indinavir,
lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, tipranavir
Second-generation antipsychotic agents, e.g., clozapine, olanzapine, paliperidone,
quetiapine, risperidone
Thiazide or loop diuretics, e.g., chlorthalidone, furosemide, hydrochlorothiazide
[a]
Medication-induced dysglycemia should not preclude the use of these medications if clinically indicated.
Goals of Therapy
Control symptoms
Establish and maintain glycemic control while avoiding hypoglycemia
Prevent or minimize the risk of acute and chronic complications
Achieve optimal control of associated risk factors such as hypertension, obesity and
dyslipidemia
Investigations
Diabetes mellitus may present in a variety of settings:
asymptomatic; incidental discovery through routine laboratory screening (see Figure 1)
nonspecific signs and symptoms such as fatigue, lassitude, weight changes
presence of diabetic macrovascular or microvascular complications including neuropathy,
kidney disease, erectile dysfunction, vision changes
acute metabolic symptoms such as polyuria, polydipsia, weight loss
diabetic ketoacidosis
The diagnosis of diabetes in Canada is established by:[3]
a random plasma glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L (random is defined as any time of day without
regard to the interval since the last meal)
a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥7 mmol/L (fasting is defined as no caloric intake for ≥8
hours)
a plasma glucose level ≥11.1 mmol/L 2 hours after a 75 g oral glucose load (oral glucose
tolerance test [OGTT])
an HbA1c ≥6.5% (in adults) using a standardized, validated assay, in the absence of
conditions that affect the accuracy of the HbA1c (not to be used for suspected T1DM)[4]
In the absence of clinical symptoms of hyperglycemia, confirm the diagnosis with a repeat test
performed on another day;[3] with the exception of a random plasma glucose, the same test should be
used to confirm the initial result.
Screening
Screening for T1DM is not recommended in individuals with normal glucose levels. While the
autoantibodies thought to contribute to the destruction of the pancreatic beta-cells can be detected
prior to disease, their presence does not guarantee that diabetes will occur. Although research
continues, there are no interventions proven to prevent or delay the onset of T1DM.
Diabetes Canada recommends screening for T2DM every 3 years in individuals over 40 years of
age, or those determined to be high risk using a validated tool such as CANRISK, by testing either
fasting plasma glucose (FPG) or HbA1c.[5][6] Earlier and more frequent testing should be
considered in individuals at a higher risk (see Table 2).[7]
[5]
Table 2: Risk Factors for Diabetes Mellitus
Age ≥40 years
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 2/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
First-degree relative with T2DM
Member of high-risk population, e.g., Indigenous, Hispanic, South Asian, Asian,
African, low socioeconomic status
History of prediabetes e.g., IFG, IGT, HbA1c 6–6.4%
History of gestational diabetes mellitus
History of delivery of a macrosomic infant
Presence of end-organ damage associated with diabetes, e.g., cardiovascular,
microvascular
Presence of vascular risk factors:
abdominal obesity[a]
HDL cholesterol <1 mmol/L in males or <1.3 in females[a]
hypertension[a]
being overweight[a]
triglycerides ≥1.7 mmol/L[a]
smoking
Presence of associated diseases:
acanthosis nigricans[a]
cystic fibrosis
history of pancreatitis
HIV infection
hyperuricemia/gout
non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
obstructive sleep apnea
polycystic ovary syndrome[a]
psychiatric disorders, e.g., bipolar disorder, depression, schizophrenia
Abbreviations: HIV = human immunodeficiency virus; IFG = impaired fasting glucose: 6.1–6.9
mmol/L; IGT = impaired glucose tolerance: OGTT result of 7.8–11 mmol/L; T2DM = type 2 diabetes
mellitus
Therapeutic Choices
Insulin must be initiated in patients with T1DM at the time of diagnosis and should be considered in
those with T2DM who present with marked hyperglycemia and HbA1c ≥1.5% above their target
(typically >8.5%). In newly diagnosed T2DM patients with HbA1c <1.5% above their target, lifestyle
modifications alone may be appropriate as a first step. However, if glycemic goals are not reached
within 3 months, pharmacotherapy should be initiated.[8]
Nonpharmacologic Choices
Nonpharmacologic therapy plays a pivotal role in the treatment of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
The use of a flow chart may be helpful to ensure interventions are not overlooked (see
www.diabetes.ca for an example).
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 4/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
HbA1c measurements every 3 months for patients who have not achieved target values;
testing every 6 months may be acceptable in stable patients who consistently meet
glycemic targets[9]
assessment of the accuracy of blood glucose meters by comparing blood glucose
readings from the glucose meter and a simultaneous phlebotomy draw at least once per
year; reading should be within 15%[9]
serum creatinine and random urine albumin-creatinine ratio once a year to screen for
chronic kidney disease[13]
lipid profile (either fasting or non-fasting) at the time of diagnosis and then annually if
results are normal initially;[14] more frequent testing (every 3–6 months) should occur if
treatment is initiated[15]
referral to a specialist (ophthalmologist or optometrist) for an eye examination using
dilated fundoscopy or wide-angle stereoscopic retinal photography at the time of
diagnosis in patients with T2DM, and 5 years after diagnosis in patients with T1DM ≥15
years; repeat annually in T1DM and every 1–2 years in T2DM if initially normal[16]
reinforcing skills learned in education and dietary counselling
patients with diabetes to reduce the risk of complications and hospitalization. In
adults, annual influenza immunization and a one-time pneumococcal vaccination is
recommended. A 2nd pneumococcal vaccination is recommended for patients over 65 years
of age who received their original immunization >5 years earlier at <65 years of age.[17]
Pharmacologic Choices
Type 1 Diabetes
The long-acting insulin analogues (LAIAs) insulin detemir and insulin glargine appear to
produce more predictable effects than intermediate-acting human insulin (NPH) and are
associated with fewer episodes of hypoglycemia, particularly nocturnal hypoglycemia.[19] In a
meta-analysis, patients with T1DM who used LAIAs for a year had significantly fewer episodes
of nocturnal hypoglycemia compared to using NPH (NNT = 20 to prevent 1 episode).[20] Insulin
glargine is available in different formulations, including a concentrated 300 units/mL product.
This concentrated formulation appears to have a longer duration of action, has no peak effect
and further reduces hypoglycemia compared to glargine 100 units/mL.[21] Insulin degludec is
a long-acting basal insulin available in 100 units/mL and 200 units/mL strengths. Insulin
degludec has a long duration of action of approximately 42 hours.[22] Compared with insulin
glargine 100 units/mL, it was shown to be as effective in controlling glucose, with a 26%
relative risk reduction in nocturnal hypoglycemia.[23]
Insulin Regimens
Although an in-depth discussion about the different types of insulin regimens is beyond the
scope of this chapter, the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) showed that
intensive treatment regimens control blood glucose more effectively than conventional
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 5/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
regimens and reduce the risk of long-term diabetic microvascular complications
(retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy).[24] Follow-up data from the trial demonstrate a
long-term benefit of intensive therapy on the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality.[25]
Newly diagnosed patients and those with poor glycemic control on conventional regimens
should be offered the option of intensive diabetes management consisting of multiple-dose
insulin (MDI) regimens (see Table 3). It is essential to assess each patient to determine
whether an intensive regimen is a suitable option. Less intensive regimens may be a better
choice in the frail elderly, unmotivated patients or those who lack awareness of severe
hypoglycemia. In clinical practice, RAIA in combination with LAIA is preferred over regular
insulin in order to minimize risk of hypoglycemia and improve HbA1c and postprandial
glucose levels.[26][27]
Most lean patients with T1DM require approximately 0.5 units of insulin per kilogram of
body mass. In the first few months following a T1DM diagnosis, patients may experience
periods where the requirement for insulin is decreased or transiently eliminated. This
phenomenon is known as the honeymoon phase. Initiate insulin therapy judiciously in order
to minimize the risk of hypoglycemia and adjust the dose every 2–3 days according to
blood glucose results. Regular home monitoring allows patients to adjust the dose of insulin
in response to abnormal blood glucose levels, effects of diet and exercise, and changing
blood glucose patterns. Optimal blood glucose control is achieved by matching the timing
of insulin injections with caloric intake: regular insulin is given approximately 30 minutes
before meals and RAIAs should ideally be administered 0–15 minutes prior to starting a
meal.
The use of insulin pumps and regimens involving multiple doses of RAIA (vs. regular
human insulin) improves the stability of postprandial glucose levels and may also diminish
the frequency and severity of hypoglycemia, especially early nocturnal hypoglycemia. In
addition, insulin pumps can achieve a tighter and more reproducible degree of glycemic
control, particularly in those with a high initial HbA1c, but at a significantly increased
expense for the patient.
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 6/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
is the most common adverse effect of insulin therapy and occurs more
frequently in patients aiming for tight control of blood glucose.
Good glycemic control will always come with the risk of hypoglycemia.
Hypoglycemia is most commonly the result of either a missed meal or an
unusual amount of exercise. Frequent hypoglycemic events may lead to reduced
autonomic symptoms ( ). Teach patients to account
for diet and physical activity when planning insulin treatment regimens.
hypoglycemia is manifested by autonomic symptoms:
sweating, tremors, tachycardia, hunger, nausea and a general sensation of
weakness. It can easily be treated with an oral source of sugar. Fifteen grams of
glucose (e.g., 3/4 cup of juice or regular soft drink, 6 Life Savers) will usually
raise the blood glucose approximately 2 mmol/L within 20 minutes.
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 7/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
hypoglycemia requires assistance in its recognition and/or treatment.
Neuroglycopenic symptoms such as confusion, altered behaviour, difficulty
speaking and disorientation can progress to seizures and coma, and prevent the
patient from appropriately treating the hypoglycemic episode. If the patient is
conscious, an oral glucose preparation consisting of 20 grams of carbohydrate
should be used, preferably as glucose tablets or equivalent. Glucose gel is not a
preferred treatment option. It must be swallowed for significant effect, and the
blood glucose response is very slow.
In patients with no IV access, 1 mg of glucagon IM or SC
temporarily increases blood glucose, allowing for the intake of oral carbohydrate.
Glucagon is effective in malnourished patients or in alcohol-induced
hypoglycemia. If IV access is available, the treatment of choice is 20–50 mL of
50% dextrose IV over 1–3 minutes.
Assess specifically for and use strategies to recover
awareness, such as relaxing glycemic targets for up to 3 months and increasing
patient self-monitoring of BG.[28][29]
(lipohypertrophy) is most often the result of frequent use of
the same injection site. This results in low or unpredictable absorption of insulin from
that site, and in some cases, disfigurement. All patients should be educated about the
need to rotate injection sites in a systematic fashion.
, such as urticaria, angioedema, rashes and local erythema, are rare
with human insulin. If they do occur, switching to a different insulin manufacturer may
help.
Immune-mediated due to the production of anti-insulin antibodies is
also rare with human insulin. Patients who have developed immune-mediated
resistance to animal insulins should be switched to human insulin. Reduce the dose
substantially at the initiation of the switch. Concentrated regular insulin, 500 units/mL,
may be useful in the treatment of patients requiring very large doses of insulin.
Concern was raised about a possible association between and the use
of insulin glargine.[30] However, a focused look at breast cancer incidence with the
use of any type of insulin, including glargine, did not reveal increased rates of cancer.
[31]
Initial management of patients with T2DM generally depends on the HbA1c, as described
below:[8]
In patients with an HbA1c less than 1.5% above their personalized target, initiate
nonpharmacologic therapy alone (e.g., diet and exercise); however, medications must be
initiated without delay if glycemic targets are not met within 3 months. Upon starting
medication in these patients, monotherapy with metformin is the drug of choice unless
contraindicated; however, initial treatment may include a combination of oral agents and/or
insulin if the patient is exhibiting hyperglycemic symptoms or if it is unreasonable to expect
excellent control with this approach. The patient populations in whom metformin use is
contraindicated or cautioned will be discussed in further detail below.
In patients with an HbA1c more than 1.5% above their personalized target, medication should
be initiated immediately (along with diet and exercise). In these patients, combination therapy
(preferably metformin combined with another drug) with medications from different classes
may be required. In addition to oral medications, bedtime insulin can be considered as an
appropriate 2nd agent at this point. Also a MDI regimen may be appropriate in patients who
exhibit extremely high glucose levels at presentation, or for those who are very symptomatic.
In all patients who have been started on antihyperglycemic agents, aim to reach the desired
HbA1c target within 3–6 months through dosage titration or addition of other agents (see
Figure 2, Table 8). Typically, the higher the baseline HbA1c, the greater the reduction in HbA1c
that can be achieved with treatment.[32] After metformin, the drug chosen as the second-line
agent should be individualized, taking into consideration presence of clinical cardiovascular
disease, kidney function, hypoglycemia and weight concerns, cost, and insurance coverage,
amongst others.
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 8/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
Vascular protection is a significant goal in the management of diabetes (see Targets for
Control). In 2008 the FDA began requiring cardiovascular safety trials as part of the approval
process for new medications for T2DM. None of the cardiovascular outcome trials initiated
since 2008 have demonstrated an increase in cardiovascular events, and some trials found a
reduction in CV events. Currently there are more trials testing cardiovascular endpoints for
other agents ongoing. Diabetes Canada recommends that the results of cardiovascular safety
trials be considered when selecting medications for the treatment of T2DM.[8]
Biguanides
Metformin is generally considered the first choice for patients with a new and
uncomplicated diagnosis of T2DM. It decreases hepatic glucose production and may lower
glucose absorption and enhance insulin-mediated glucose uptake. It is not associated with
weight gain, it lowers HbA1c by approximately 1–1.5% and the risk of hypoglycemia is low
when it is used as monotherapy. However, it can potentiate the hypoglycemic effects of
insulin and sulfonylureas. Although the use of metformin has traditionally been discouraged
due to the perceived risk of lactic acidosis in patients with heart failure, renal or hepatic
disease, or hypoxemic states, a Cochrane review of 347 studies comparing over 70 000
subjects found no increase in the rate of lactic acidosis among patients receiving metformin
compared with controls receiving other antihyperglycemic agents.[33] Metformin is thought
to improve CV risk,[8] is considered safe to use in stable heart failure and liver disease, and
reduced doses can be used with creatinine clearance >30 mL/min. Metformin is also
routinely held preoperatively and when imaging-contrast agents are being given due to the
possibility of acute renal failure, which may increase the risk of lactic acidosis.
Alpha-glucosidase Inhibitors
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 9/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
associated with an increased rate (3%) of diabetic retinopathy complications compared to
placebo (1.8%).[38] Dulaglutide and semaglutide are given SC once weekly. Liraglutide is
given SC once daily without regard to meals, and lixisenatide is given SC once daily within
1 hour of a meal. Exenatide is marketed in 2 formulations. The solution is administered by
SC injection twice daily prior to meals, while the injectable suspension is administered by
SC injection once weekly without regard to meals.
Repaglinide and nateglinide (not available in Canada) promote insulin release, but their
actions are much shorter compared with SUs. Meglitinides need to be taken just prior to
meals to reduce postprandial glucose elevations and should be omitted if the meal is
missed. Repaglinide is expected to lower HbA1c to a similar extent as SUs and it is also
considered to confer a lower risk of hypoglycemia in the context of missed meals (patients
who skip meals could omit the associated repaglinide dose). FPG usually drops after about
1 month of regular use.[43] It has been theorized that the greater effect on postprandial
glucose compared with SUs would translate into a more favourable effect on cardiovascular
outcomes; however, this benefit has not been established.[41]
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 10/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
to placebo,[47][48] and research is ongoing into whether these agents may help preserve
renal function.[49][50]
Thiazolidinediones (TZDs)
Concerns have emerged about the increased risk of bladder cancer with pioglitazone.[62]
This TZD is now contraindicated in patients with active or previous bladder cancer. Various
countries have suspended the sale of both TZDs due to cardiovascular or bladder cancer
concerns.
Due to the progressive nature of T2DM, noninsulin antihyperglycemic agents gradually lose
their effectiveness over time. Insulin remains an important option for patients because of its
powerful effects on lowering HbA1c. Insulin does not alter CV risk.[8] Although it is
appropriate to consider insulin initiation at any point in the management of T2DM, it is
commonly reserved for the following situations:
Maximum tolerated dose of noninsulin antihyperglycemic agents yet HbA1c still not at
target
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 11/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
End-organ damage (e.g., kidney failure), making use of some antihyperglycemics
inappropriate
At initial diagnosis when HbA1c ≥1.5% above the individualized target
With metabolic decompensation
In pregnancy and in women planning pregnancy
The use of insulin is often delayed because of the perceived complexity of self-injections.
Also, insulin is associated with weight gain and carries a risk of hypoglycemia; thus, self-
monitoring is critical to its safe and effective use. Insulin is eventually required, either alone
or in combination with other agents.[8] Many patients with T2DM require high doses of
insulin (≥1 unit/kg) to overcome their significant insulin resistance. There are several
commonly used insulin regimens (see Table 3):
Generally, insulin is added to existing antihyperglycemic therapy when targets are not
being met after a 3‑month trial. Daily bedtime injection of basal insulin is prescribed at
a dose of 0.1–0.2 units/kg of LAIA or NPH insulin.[8][63] Alternatively, an empiric dose
of 5–10 units of LAIA (glargine or detemir) or intermediate (NPH) may be initially
chosen depending on whether the patient is lean or obese. Subsequently, the dose is
adjusted to achieve a fasting glucose <7 mmol/L. Some clinicians will choose to adjust
insulin by 2 units every 3 days, whereas others may choose to increase basal insulin
by 1 unit every night until the fasting blood glucose (FBG) target is achieved. Other
agents may need to be reduced once glycemic control is achieved; metformin is often
continued because it has proven to lower insulin requirements, ameliorate weight gain
and reduce the risk of hypoglycemia.[64]
If glycemic targets are not being met with bedtime insulin in combination with a
daytime antihyperglycemic regimen, an intensified insulin regimen can be initiated
with the introduction of mealtime insulin(s) depending upon blood glucose patterns.
Generally, oral antihyperglycemic medications are discontinued when mealtime insulin
injections are added with the exception of metformin, which can help minimize weight
gain and reduce the amount of insulin required.
If glycemic values are extremely high upon initial presentation, then intensive insulin
therapy may be started immediately, rather than introducing oral agents. To initiate
insulin, start with 40% of the total daily dose (0.5 units/kg total insulin units divided
over the 24-hour day) administered as a basal insulin (NPH or LAIA) and 20% of the
daily dose administered before meals 3 times daily (regular or RAIA). The dose is
then adjusted to achieve glycemic targets; fasting and pre-meal glucose <7 mmol and
2-hour postprandial glucose <10 mmol in most cases.
Insulin may be administered in twice-daily injections of a premixed insulin with two-
thirds of the daily dose (0.5 units/kg) administered in the morning before breakfast and
the remaining one-third of the daily dose administered before the evening meal
(usually 30/70 [30% regular, 70% basal mix] in the morning and evening). These
regimens provide convenience at the expense of flexibility and the ability to correct for
abnormal results. However, this approach is a reasonable alternative for patients with
diabetes who have little variation in exercise or food intake from day to day, require
home care for insulin injections, or do not have the cognitive ability or visual acuity to
adjust insulin doses. In order to achieve glycemic targets with this regimen, both the
dose and type of mixture may need to be modified.
The 2018 Diabetes Canada clinical practice guidelines emphasize that glycemic targets should be
individualized based on patient-specific factors (see Table 4). The target of HbA1c ≤7% for most
patients with T1DM and T2DM is based on strong evidence supporting the relationship between
tight glucose control and a reduction in microvascular and neuropathic complications.[65] In
contrast, it remains unclear if macrovascular (ischemic) events are influenced by tight glucose
control.[68][69][70] A more aggressive HbA1c of ≤6.5% may be targeted in patients with T2DM if the
benefits are thought to outweigh the risk of hypoglycemia. Conversely, a higher HbA1c of up to
8.5% may be more appropriate if the risk of hypoglycemia outweighs the benefits of tight control,
e.g., in frail elderly patients, those with limited life expectancy or patients with a history of recurrent
severe hypoglycemia.[65]
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 12/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
[65][66][67]
Table 4: Recommended Targets for Blood Glucose Control
FPG/Preprandial
Age Diabetes HbA1c Glucose 2-h PPG
(years) Type (%) (mmol/L) (mmol/L)
T2 ≤6.5[a]
4–7 5–10
>18 T1,T2 ≤7 4–5.5 if goal HbA1c 5–8 if goal HbA1c not
not reached reached
T1, T2 7.1–8.5[b]
[a]
Consider HbA1c ≤6.5% in some T2DM patients to reduce risk of nephropathy and retinopathy.
[b]
HbA1c 7.1–8% may be considered for functionally dependent patients. Consider HbA1c 7.1–8.5%
where there is a history of recurrent, severe hypoglycemia, limited life expectancy, or in the frail elderly
with or without dementia.
[c]
Consider preprandial targets of 6–10 mmol/L as well as higher HbA1c targets in children and
adolescents who have had severe or excessive hypoglycemia or have hypoglycemia unawareness
Abbreviations: HbA1c = glycosylated hemoglobin; FPG = fasting plasma glucose; PPG = postprandial
plasma glucose; T1 = type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2 = type 2 diabetes mellitus
Both type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus can occur in women of childbearing age, while
(GDM) is a condition that develops during pregnancy, primarily due to
insulin resistance that results from the high levels of gestational hormones.[73] Regardless of the
specific diagnosis type, the existence of diabetes in pregnancy significantly increases the risk of
negative outcomes in both the mother and fetus/infant.[74] Pre-existing diabetes (type 1 or 2)
increases the risk of miscarriage, perinatal mortality, fetal macrosomia and congenital
malformations, the latter being due to hyperglycemia in the first weeks of gestation.[75] Similarly,
GDM increases the risk of fetal hyperinsulinemia, heavier birth weight, higher rates of cesarean
deliveries and neonatal hypoglycemia.[73] Children born to mothers with diabetes and mothers
with a history of GDM also appear to have an increased risk of developing diabetes in the future.
[76]
When diabetes is pre-existing, pre-pregnancy counselling is essential and good glucose control
should be achieved even before conception.[73] Although the benefits of treating women with pre-
existing diabetes have been clearly demonstrated,[73] the benefits of treating GDM are less clear.
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 13/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
[77][78]
Diabetes treatments confer a risk of hypoglycemia and some may exhibit teratogenic
effects; thus, careful monitoring and therapeutic selection is required. Fortunately, hypoglycemia
may not pose substantial risks to the developing fetus,[75] but instances of diabetic ketoacidosis
are very dangerous and can occur in cases such as unrecognized failure of an insulin pump.
Pre-pregnancy Planning
Counsel women of childbearing age with diabetes about the need to plan and prepare for any
pregnancy in order to minimize the risks to the fetus and the mother. In the months preceding
conception, women should undertake the following risk-reduction activities:[73]
Begin folic acid supplementation at least 3 months prior to conception. The initial dose
should be 1 mg daily and is continued until at least 12 weeks’ gestation.
Undergo an eye exam because pregnancy can accelerate retinopathy resulting from poor
glycemic control. A baseline exam should occur prior to conception and subsequent
exams should be scheduled periodically during the pregnancy and for 1 year postpartum.
Continue insulin, metformin or glyburide if already taking; switch to an insulin regimen
from other non-insulin antihyperglycemic agents. Aim to achieve an HbA1c level of ≤7%
(≤6.5% if safely achievable).
Undergo screening for cardiovascular disease (or risk factors) and chronic kidney disease
(CKD). Clinicians should be especially vigilant about CKD and hypertension prior to and
throughout pregnancy, given the risk of an additive effect with pregnancy.
Discontinue any teratogenic medications such as ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor
blockers or statins. The fast-acting insulin analogues lispro and aspart are safe in
pregnancy and may provide a decreased risk of hypoglycemia compared with regular
insulin.[79][80][81] In women with pre-existing diabetes, NPH insulin or LAIA (detemir and
glargine) can be used throughout pregnancy.[82][83]
All pregnant women should be screened for GDM. There is controversy over the most
appropriate approach to screening. See Figure 3 for the approach preferred by Diabetes
Canada. Referral to a specialized clinic for the management of diabetes in pregnancy, if
available, is recommended. Initiate nonpharmacologic therapy (strict diet and exercise) in
women who are newly diagnosed with GDM.[73] Continue nonpharmacologic therapy and start
multiple daily injections of RAIA or regular insulin if fasting and postprandial targets have not
been met within 2 weeks of adjusting these lifestyle measures.[84][85] In women with GDM who
cannot take insulin, it may be reasonable to consider glyburide or metformin, recognizing
that use of either agent is off-label.[78][86]
In women with diabetes who successfully become pregnant, strict glycemic control is
recommended, along with frequent self-monitoring of blood glucose. Both pre- and
postprandial testing is suggested in order to facilitate the achievement of both targets outlined
in Table 5. Aim to achieve an HbA1c level of ≤6.5% (≤6.1% if safely achievable). In addition,
ketone testing (urine or blood) may be considered to ensure that the diet is adequate to
prevent starvation ketosis. To reduce the risk of preeclampsia, women with pre-existing
diabetes should start ASA 81 mg daily at 12–16 weeks’ gestation. Consider the use of an
insulin pump or CGM to improve glycemic control in those with T1DM.
[73]
Table 5: Recommended Glycemic Targets during Pregnancy
FPG/Preprandial 1-Hour Postprandial 2-Hour Postprandial
Glucose (mmol/L) Glucose (mmol/L) Glucose (mmol/L)
<5.3 <7.8 <6.7
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 14/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
Mothers with diabetes are encouraged to breastfeed to reduce the risk of childhood obesity.[73]
Although insulin is transferred into breast milk, it poses little risk to the infant because the
hormone is degraded in the gastrointestinal tract before reaching the systemic circulation.[86] As a
result, breastfeeding mothers receiving insulin do not need to alter their regimen unless it is in
response to their personal glycemic levels. Frequent monitoring of blood glucose is extremely
important after delivery because insulin requirements may change quickly, and the increased
caloric output during breastfeeding theoretically puts the mother at increased risk of hypoglycemia.
After delivery, most women will remain in hospital for at least 24 hours. During this time,
glycemic monitoring should be performed frequently to assess for changes in blood glucose
levels. In many cases of GDM, hyperglycemia will resolve completely during this time and
antihyperglycemic medications may be discontinued altogether. In addition, all postpartum
women with GDM should have their glycemic status assessed by their primary care provider
sometime in the months following delivery. All patients diagnosed with GDM should have a 75
g OGTT between 6 weeks and 6 months following delivery to detect persistent hyperglycemia.
In women who require ongoing antihyperglycemic medication, insulin remains the first choice
for reasons stated above. However, both glyburide and metformin have also been used in
breastfeeding women with T2DM. Limited data suggest glyburide does not pass into breast
milk and metformin appears to have little penetration.[86] Although these agents can be
considered for use in breastfeeding mothers, long-term studies have not been done to rule out
any unanticipated adverse effects.
A discussion of general principles on the use of medications in these special populations can
be found in Drug Use during Pregnancy and Drug Use during Breastfeeding. Other specialized
reference sources are also provided in these appendices.
Therapeutic Tips
Assess all patients every 3–6 months. Study their home monitoring records (if available) and
note the occurrence, frequency and trends of hypoglycemia. Hypoglycemia should be addressed
before hyperglycemia to ensure patient safety in the short term.
Review home blood glucose records, looking for predictable glucose trends that can be
improved upon. Whether glucose readings are printed out, tabulated in a logbook or in the
glucometer memory, they must be brought to follow-up appointments, reviewed and discussed.
Inadequate control of diabetes is frequently related to poor adherence to diet and/or
medications. Chronic infections can also negatively impact glucose control.
The use of snacks may be important in some patients who use insulin and experience glycemic
variability between meals; this could consist of a small amount of carbohydrate and protein. Not
everyone will require a snack between meals.
Monitor blood sugar, blood pressure, serum lipids, and body weight, and for the presence of
complications. Foot examination is an integral part of such monitoring (see Nonpharmacologic
Choices).
Encourage all patients at risk of hypoglycemia to wear a MedicAlert ID bracelet or the
equivalent.
.....
Several large studies have examined nonpharmacologic (diet, exercise, weight loss) and
pharmacologic strategies aimed at preventing the onset of T2DM in high-risk individuals.
The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study (DPS)[89] and the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP)[90]
showed that along with a supervised of moderate intensity (about
150 min/wk) significantly reduced the relative risk of progression from prediabetes to diabetes by 58%
at 4 years. In the DPS, diabetes was diagnosed in 11% of those randomized to lifestyle intervention
versus 23% in the control group. In the DPP study, diabetes developed in 4.8%, 7.8% and 11% of
those randomized to lifestyle intervention, metformin and placebo respectively. The weight loss
associated with lifestyle interventions was about 5–6% of initial body weight in these studies.
Interestingly, the benefits of the lifestyle changes persisted long after these trials were completed.[91]
[92] These findings prove the success of lifestyle interventions and the significance for all people at
high-risk of developing diabetes.
Other studies have evaluated the impact of pharmacologic interventions on the incidence of T2DM. It
has been shown that metformin,[90][92] acarbose,[93] TZDs,[94][95][96][97] and orlistat[98] can also
reduce the incidence of T2DM in at-risk patients. In 1 study, rosiglitazone significantly reduced the
risk of progression to diabetes from 26% to 11.6% over 3 years compared with placebo, a similar
benefit to that reported in the lifestyle intervention trials above. The benefit was offset to some extent
by a significantly higher incidence of heart failure relative to placebo (0.5% vs. 0.1%).[94] In contrast,
ramipril did not prevent the progression from prediabetes to diabetes in this same study.[99]
There are no known safe and effective measures to prevent T1DM, although recent advances in
immunomodulatory therapies have reached human trials. Time and controlled trials are still needed to
review and assess the efficacy and safety of these interventions.[100]
.....
Diabetic Ketoacidosis
Diabetic ketoacidosis is found most often in T1DM and may be seen at 1st presentation in newly
diagnosed patients, or when patients are nonadherent to insulin therapy. It is also often associated
with the onset of a severe or stressful illness (e.g., severe infection), surgery, trauma, MI or the use of
SGLT2 inhibitors in patients who were previously stable. Patients with diabetic ketoacidosis are
generally hospitalized. A detailed patient care flow sheet is published in the 2018 Diabetes Canada
clinical practice guidelines and is available online[101] (www.guidelines.diabetes.ca). Management of
diabetic ketoacidosis is outlined in Table 6.
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 16/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
250 mL for 4 h (faster if in shock), then individualize. Good urinary output is reassuring that
volume is being replaced.
Potassium: Potassium chloride is the preparation of choice. Do not give unless urine is
being produced; may need to wait for IV fluids to improve volume status. If serum K+ is <3.3
mmol/L, add K+ 40 mmol/L of fluid; if 3.3–5.5 mmol/L, add K+ 20 mmol/L; if >5.5 mmol/L, do
not add K+, but monitor hourly. Rehydration and insulin will drive K+ levels down.
Insulin: Do not give insulin if K+ is <3.3 mmol/L, as insulin will drive K+ into cells and drop
levels further. Once K+ >3.3 mmol/L, insulin can be infused at 0.1 units/kg/h using a 2nd IV
line. One protocol is as follows: mix 25 units R insulin in 250 mL NS and adjust rate to drop
glucose to <14 mmol/L. Continue IV insulin until the anion gap resolves and patient eating
without nausea. stop or hold insulin in DKA. Rather, if the glucose drops below 14
mmol/L, continue the insulin infusion but also switch the saline IV to D5½NS and adjust the
IV rate to maintain glucose between 12 and 14 mmol/L. When anion gap closed and patient
eating, overlap IV insulin with SC insulin by 2 h before stopping IV. DKA can rapidly reoccur if
waiting for SC insulin to peak.
Bicarbonate: Not first-line therapy and infrequently used. Consider giving 1 ampoule (50
mmol) of sodium bicarbonate in 200 mL D5W over 1 h if acidosis is severe and ICU is being
considered (e.g., pH <7, lowered LOC).
Supportive care: Keep the patient warm and rested. Insert an NG tube if vomiting and a
urinary catheter if anuric (urinary retention may be significant).
Pitfalls:
• Children with DKA are at higher risk of cerebral edema due to treatment of DKA with
associated sodium, pH and glucose shifts. It is essential that a specialized team and
monitored setting be used in pediatric cases. A diagnosis of DKA does not initially require
detection of ketones. Routine detection of ketones may require both urine and blood testing
over time.
• For urinary ketones, Ketostix strips detect acetoacetate but not hydroxybutyrate; beware of
false negatives. Acetone smell may be absent, undetected or unrecognized by some. Where
available, use rapid beta-hydroxybutyrate testing.
• Temperature may be low initially—absence of fever does not rule out infection.
• Leukocytosis is usually present and does not necessarily mean infection.
• Low serum sodium may be due to pseudohyponatremia from high glucose or TG.
• High serum potassium is caused by acidosis and may be seen in spite of severe total body
potassium depletion.
• Dehydration may mask a respiratory infection; reassess after rehydration and stabilization.
• Severe abdominal pain or signs of an acute abdomen need to be reassessed after
stabilization—they often disappear.
• A premature switch to SC insulin and/or discharge results in high recurrence and
readmission rates.
Abbreviations: ABG = arterial blood gases; CBC = complete blood count; D5½NS = dextrose 5% with ½
normal saline; D5W = dextrose 5%; DKA = diabetic ketoacidosis; ICU = intensive care unit; K+
= potassium; LOC = level of consciousness; NG = nasogastric; NS = normal saline; R = regular; TG
= triglycerides
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 17/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
.....
Algorithms
[a]
Figure 1: Screening and Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus
[a]
If both FPG and HbA1c are available but discordant, use the test that appears furthest to the right
side of the algorithm.
[b]
Consider 75 g OGTT if ≥1 risk factors.
[c]
Consider 75 g OGTT.
[d]
Prediabetes = IFG or HbA1c 6–6.4%.
[e]
In the presence of symptoms of hyperglycemia, a single test result in the diabetes range is sufficient
to make the diagnosis of diabetes. In the absence of symptoms of hyperglycemia, if a single laboratory
test result is in the diabetes range, a repeat confirmatory laboratory test (FPG, HbA1c, 2hPG in a 75 g
OGTT) must be done on another day. It is preferable that the same test be repeated (in a timely
fashion) for confirmation, but a random PG in the diabetes range in an asymptomatic individual should
be confirmed with an alternative test. If results of two different tests are available and both are above
the diagnostic cut points, the diagnosis of diabetes is confirmed.
Abbreviations: 2hPG = 2-hour plasma glucose; FPG = fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c = glycosylated
hemoglobin; IFG = impaired fasting glucose; OGTT = oral glucose tolerance test; PG = plasma glucose
Adapted from Ekoé JM, Goldenberg R, Katz P. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and
management of diabetes in Canada: Screening for diabetes in adults. 2018;42(Suppl 1):S16-9, Copyright
(2018), with permission from Elsevier. Journal homepage: journals.elsevier.com/canadian-journal-of-diabetes.
[8]
Figure 2: Stepwise Approach to Type 2 Diabetes
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 18/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
[a]
Reinforce the need to continue lifestyle interventions at every opportunity.
[b]
See Table 4 for suggested HbA1c target.
[c]
Drug regimens should be adjusted in a timely fashion so as to achieve the target HbA1c level within
3–6 months.
[a]
Figure 3: Diabetes Canada Preferred Strategy for Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 19/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
[a]
In view of the controversies about diagnostic tests, other accepted methods may be used.
Abbreviations: 1hPG = 1-hour plasma glucose; 2hPG = 2-hour plasma glucose; FPG = fasting plasma
glucose; GDM = gestational diabetes mellitus; OGTT = oral glucose tolerance test; PG = plasma glucose
Reproduced from Feig DS, Berger H, Donovan D et al. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and
management of diabetes in Canada: Diabetes and pregnancy. 2018;42(Suppl 1):S255-82, Copyright (2018),
with permission from Elsevier. Journal homepage: journals.elsevier.com/canadian-journal-of-diabetes.
Drug Tables
Table 7: Insulin and Analogues[a]
Drug/Cost[b] Onset Peak Duration Comments
$$$
$$$
$$
$$$$$/10 mL
vial
$$
$$$$$/10 mL
vial
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 20/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
$$
$$$
NovoMix 30
$$$
[a]
Insulin products are shown in order of onset of action, with the very rapid-acting insulin analogues at the
top. Mixed insulin products are grouped at the end of the table.
[b]
Cost of 5 × 3 mL cartridges unless otherwise specified; includes drug cost only.
Legend: $ < $25 $$ $25–50 $$$ $50–75 $$$$ $75–100 $$$$$ $100–125
Table 8: Antihyperglycemic Agents
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 22/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 23/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 24/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 25/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 26/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 27/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 28/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 29/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 30/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 31/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
[a]
Combination therapy: always use agents from different classes; combinations can be used as initial
therapy if hyperglycemia is not expected to be controlled by a single agent.
[b] Cost of 30-day supply unless otherwise specified; includes drug cost only.
Dosage adjustment may be required in renal impairment; see Dosage Adjustment in Renal Impairment.
Legend: $ < $30 $$ $30–60 $$$ $60–90 $$$$ $90–120 $$$$$ $120–150
Suggested Readings
Davies MJ, D'Alessio DA, Fradkin J et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A
consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the
Study of Diabetes (EASD). 2018 Oct 4. [Epub ahead of print].
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 32/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical
practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada.
2018;42(Suppl 1):S1-S325. Available from: guidelines.diabetes.ca/.
Roglic G, Norris SL. Medicines for treatment intensification in type 2 diabetes and type of insulin in
type 1 and type 2 diabetes in low-resource settings: synopsis of the World Health Organization
guidelines on second- and third-line medicines and type of insulin for the control of blood glucose
levels in nonpregnant adults with diabetes mellitus. 2018;169(6):394-7.
References
1. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Sarwar N, Gao P et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood
glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102
prospective studies. 2010;375(9733):2215-22.
2. Poirier P, Bertrand OF, Leipsic J et al. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines for
the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada: Screening for the presence of
cardiovascular disease. 2018;42(Suppl 1):S170-7. Available from:
guidelines.diabetes.ca/cpg/chapter24. Accessed August 15, 2018.
3. Punthakee Z, Goldenberg R, Katz P. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines for the
prevention and management of diabetes in Canada: Definition, classification and diagnosis of
diabetes, prediabetes and metabolic syndrome. 2018;42(Suppl 1):S10-5.
Available from: guidelines.diabetes.ca/cpg/chapter3. Accessed August 15, 2018.
4. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care, Pottie K, Jaramillo A et al.
Recommendations on screening for type 2 diabetes in adults. 2012;184(15):1687-96.
5. Ekoé JM, Goldenberg R, Katz P. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines for the
prevention and management of diabetes in Canada: Screening for diabetes in adults.
2018;42(Suppl 1):S16-9. Available from: guidelines.diabetes.ca/cpg/chapter4.
Accessed August 15, 2018.
6. Robinson CA, Agarwal G, Nerenberg K. Validating the CANRISK prognostic model for
assessing diabetes risk in Canada's multi-ethnic population. 2011;32(1):19-
31.
7. Charles MA, Fontbonne A, Thibult N et al. Risk factors for NIDDM in white population. Paris
prospective study. 1991;40(7):796-9.
8. Lipscombe L, Booth G, Butalia S et al. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines for
the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada: Pharmacologic management of type
2 diabetes in adults. 2018;42(Suppl 1):S88-103. Available from:
guidelines.diabetes.ca/cpg/chapter13. Accessed August 15, 2018.
9. Berard LD, Siemens R, Woo V. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines for the
prevention and management of diabetes in Canada: Monitoring glycemic control.
2018;42(Suppl 1):S47-53. Available from: guidelines.diabetes.ca/cpg/chapter9.
Accessed August 15, 2018.
10. Sigal RJ, Armstrong MJ, Bacon SL et al. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines
for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada: Physical activity and diabetes.
2018;37(Suppl 1):S54-63. Available from:
guidelines.diabetes.ca/cpg/chapter10. Accessed August 15, 2018.
11. Tobe SW, Gilbert RE, Jones C et al. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines for the
prevention and management of diabetes in Canada: Treatment of hypertension.
2018;42(Suppl 1):S186-9. Available from: guidelines.diabetes.ca/cpg/chapter26.
Accessed August 15, 2018.
12. Embil JM, Albalawi Z, Bowering K et al. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines for
the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada: Foot care.
2018;42(Suppl 1):S222-7. Available from: guidelines.diabetes.ca/cpg/chapter32. Accessed
August 15, 2018.
13. McFarlane P, Cherney D, Gilbert RE et al. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines
for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada: Chronic kidney disease in
diabetes. 2018;42(Suppl 1):S201-9. Available from:
guidelines.diabetes.ca/cpg/chapter29. Accessed August 15, 2018.
14. Anderson TJ, Grégoire J, Pearson GJ et al. 2016 Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines
for the management of dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult.
2016;32(11):1263-82.
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 33/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
15. Mancini GB, Hegele RA, Leiter AL. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines for the
prevention and management of diabetes in Canada: Dyslipidemia.
2018;42(Suppl 1):S178-85. Available from: guidelines.diabetes.ca/cpg/chapter25. Accessed
August 15, 2018.
16. Altomare F, Kherani A, Lovshin J. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines for the
prevention and management of diabetes in Canada: Retinopathy.
2018;42(Suppl 1):S210-6. Available from: guidelines.diabetes.ca/cpg/chapter30. Accessed
August 15, 2018.
17. Husein N, Chetty A. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and
management of diabetes in Canada: Influenza, pneumococcal, hepatitis B and herpes zoster
vaccinations. 2018;42(Suppl 1):S142-4. Available from:
guidelines.diabetes.ca/cpg/chapter19. Accessed August 15, 2018.
18. Heise T, Hövelmann U, Brøndsted L et al. Faster-acting insulin aspart: earlier onset of
appearance and greater early pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects than insulin
aspart. 2015;17(7):682-8.
19. McGibbon A, Adams L, Ingersoll K et al. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines for
the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada: Glycemic management in adults with
type 1 diabetes. 2018;42(Suppl 1): S80-7. Available from:
guidelines.diabetes.ca/cpg/chapter12.
20. Vardi M, Jacobson E, Nini A et al. Intermediate acting versus long acting insulin for type 1
diabetes mellitus. 2008;(3):CD006297.
21. Becker RH, Dahmen R, Bergmann K et al. New insulin glargine 300 units·mL-1 provides a
more even activity profile and prolonged glycemic control at steady state compared with
insulin glargine 100 units·mL-1. 2014;38(4):637-43.
22. Freemantle N, Meneghini L, Christensen T et al. Insulin degludec improves health-related
quality of life (SF-36®) compared with insulin glargine in people with Type 2 diabetes starting
on basal insulin: a meta-analysis of phase 3a trials. 2013;30(2):226-32.
23. Ratner RE, Gough SC, Mathieu C et al. Hypoglycaemia risk with insulin degludec compared
with insulin glargine in type 2 and type 1 diabetes: a pre-planned meta-analysis of phase 3
trials. 2013;15(2):175-84.
24. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term
complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes Control and Complications
Trial Research Group. 1993;329(14):977-86.
25. Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY et al. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular
disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. 2005;353(25):2643-53.
26. Siebenhofer A, Plank J, Berghold A et al. Short acting insulin analogues versus regular
human insulin in patients with diabetes mellitus. 2006;
(2):CD003287.
27. Plank J, Siebenhofer A, Berghold A et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of short-acting
insulin analogues in patients with diabetes mellitus. 2005;165(12):1337-44.
28. Cryer PE. Banting Lecture. Hypoglycemia: the limiting factor in the management of IDDM.
1994;43(11):1378-89.
29. Epidemiology of severe hypoglycemia in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. The
DCCT Research Group. 1991;90(4):450-9.
30. Mayer D, Shukla A, Enzmann H. Proliferative effects of insulin analogues on mammary
epithelial cells. 2008;114(1):38-44.
31. Grimaldi-Bensouda L, Cameron D, Marty M et al. Risk of breast cancer by individual insulin
use: an international multicenter study. 2014;37(1):134-43.
32. Sherifali D, Nerenberg K, Pullenayegum E et al. The effect of oral antidiabetic agents on A1C
levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2010;33(8):1859-64.
33. Salpeter S, Greyber E, Pasternak G et al. Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with
metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus. 2010;(4):CD002967.
34. Peters A. Incretin-based therapies: review of current clinical trial data.
2010;123(3 Suppl):S28-S37.
35. Scirica BM, Bhatt DL, Braunwald E et al. Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients
with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. 2013;369(14):1317-26.
36. Brubaker PL. Minireview: update on incretin biology: focus on glucagon-like peptide-1.
2010;151(5):1984-9.
37. Elbrond B, Jakobsen G, Larsen S et al. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and
tolerability of a single-dose of NN2211, a long-acting glucagon-like peptide 1 derivative, in
healthy male subjects. 2002;25(8):1398-404.
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 34/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
38. CPS online. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Pharmacists Association; 2018. Ozempic [product
monograph]. Available from: www.myrxtx.ca. Subscription required.
39. Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown‑Frandsen K et al. Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in
Type 2 diabetes. 2016;375(4):311-22.
40. Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A et al. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients
with type 2 diabetes. 2016;375(19):1834-44.
41. Bolen S, Feldman L, Vassy J et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and safety
of oral medications for type 2 diabetes mellitus. 2007;147(6):386-99.
42. American Geriatrics Society 2012 Beers Criteria Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society
updated Beers Criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults.
2012;60(4):616-31.
43. Lebovitz HE. Oral therapies for diabetic hyperglycemia.
2001;30(4):909-33.
44. Neumiller JJ, White JR, Campbell RK. Sodium-glucose co-transport inhibitors: progress and
therapeutic potential in type 2 diabetes mellitus. 2010;70(4):377-85.
45. Cefalu WT, Leiter LA, Yoon KH. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin versus glimepiride in
patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (CANTATA-SU): 52 week
results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority trial.
2013;382(9896):941-50.
46. List JF, Woo V, Morales E et al. Sodium-glucose cotransport inhibition with dapagliflozin in
type 2 diabetes. 2009;32(4):650-7.
47. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality
in Type 2 diabetes. 2015;373(22):2117-28.
48. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW et al. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in
type 2 diabetes. 2017;377(7):644-57.
49. U.S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. Kramer MH.
. Available from:
clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02682563?term=sglt2. Accessed September 13, 2018.
50. U.S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. Kramer MH.
. Available from:
clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03433248?term=sglt2. Accessed September 13, 2018
51. Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP et al. Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2
diabetes. 2018 Nov 10. [Epub ahead of print]
52. Yki-Jarvinen H. Thiazolidinediones. 2004;351(11):1106-18.
53. Chiquette E, Ramirez G, Defronzo R. A meta-analysis comparing the effect of
thiazolidinediones on cardiovascular risk factors. 2004;164(19):2097-104.
54. Dormandy JA, Charbonnel B, Eckland DJ et al. Secondary prevention of macrovascular
events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone
Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised controlled trial.
2005;366(9493):1279-89.
55. Ryan EH, Han DP, Ramsay RC et al. Diabetic macular edema associated with glitazone use.
2006;26(5):562-70.
56. Meier C, Kraenzlin ME, Bodmer M et al. Use of thiazolidinediones and fracture risk.
2008;168(8):820-5.
57. Bilik D, McEwen LN, Brown MB et al. Thiazolidinediones and fractures: evidence from
translating research into action for diabetes. 2010;95(10):4560-5.
58. Diamond GA, Bax L, Kaul S. Uncertain effects of rosiglitazone on the risk for myocardial
infarction and cardiovascular death. 2007;147(8):578-81.
59. Nissen SE, Wolski K. Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death
from cardiovascular causes. 2007;356(24):2457-71.
60. Kaul S, Bolger AF, Herrington D et al. Thiazolidinedione drugs and cardiovascular risks: a
science advisory from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology
Foundation. 2010;121(16):1868-77.
61. Mahaffey KW, Hafley G, Dickerson S et al. Results of a reevaluation of cardiovascular
outcomes in the RECORD trial 2013;166(2):240-9.
62. Colmers IN, Bowker SL, Majumdar SR et al. Use of thiazolidinediones and the risk of bladder
cancer among people with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. 2012;184(12):E675-83.
63. Holman RR, Farmer AJ, Davies MJ et al. Three-year efficacy of complex insulin regimens in
type 2 diabetes. 2009;361(18):1736-47.
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 35/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
64. Douek IF, Allen SE, Ewings P et al. Continuing metformin when starting insulin in patients with
Type 2 diabetes: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial.
2005;22(5):634-40.
65. Imran SA, Agarwal G, Bajaj HS et al. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines for
the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada: Targets for glycemic control.
2018;42(Suppl 1):S42-6. Available from: guidelines.diabetes.ca/cpg/chapter8.
Accessed August 15, 2018.
66. Wherrett DK, Ho J, Huot C et al. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines for the
prevention and management of diabetes in Canada: Type 1 diabetes in children and
adolescents. 2018;42(Suppl 1):S234-46. Available from:
guidelines.diabetes.ca/cpg/chapter34. Accessed August 15, 2018.
67. Panagiotopoulos C, Hadjiyannakis S, Henderson M. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice
guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada: Type 2 diabetes in
children and adolescents. 2018;42(Suppl 1):S247-54. Available from:
guidelines.diabetes.ca/cpg/chapter35. Accessed August 15, 2018
68. Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group, Gerstein HC, Miller ME et al.
Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. 2008;358(24):2545-59.
69. ADVANCE Collaborative Group, Patel A, MacMahon S et al. Intensive blood glucose control
and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. 2008;358(24):2560-72.
70. Duckworth W, Abraira C, Moritz T et al. Glucose control and vascular complications in
veterans with type 2 diabetes. 2009;360(2):129-39.
71. Stone JA, Houlden RL, Lin P et al. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines for the
prevention and management of diabetes in Canada: Cardiovascular protection in people with
diabetes. 2018;42(Suppl 1):S162-9. Available from:
guidelines.diabetes.ca/cpg/chapter23. Accessed August 15, 2018.
72. Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N et al. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in
patients with type 2 diabetes. 2003;348(5):383-93.
73. Feig DS, Berger H, Donovan L et al. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines for the
prevention and management of diabetes in Canada: Diabetes and pregnancy.
2018;42(Suppl 1):S255-82. Available from: guidelines.diabetes.ca/cpg/chapter36. Accessed
August 15, 2018.
74. Balsells M, Garcia-Patterson A, Gich I et al. Maternal and fetal outcome in women with type 2
versus type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and metaanalysis.
2009;94(11):4284-91.
75. Martis R, Brown J, Alsweiler J et al. Different intensities of glycaemic control for pregnant
women with pre-existing diabetes. 2016;(4):CD011624.
76. Dabelea D, Knowler WC, Pettitt DJ. Effect of diabetes in pregnancy on offspring: follow-up
research in the Pima Indians. 2000;9(1):83-8.
77. Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR et al. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on
pregnancy outcomes. 2005;352(24):2477-86.
78. Alwan N, Tuffnell DJ, West J. Treatments for gestational diabetes.
2009;(3):CD003395.
79. Mathiesen ER, Kinsley B, Amiel SA et al. Maternal glycemic control and hypoglycemia in type
1 diabetic pregnancy: a randomized trial of insulin aspart versus human insulin in 322
pregnant women. 2007;30(4):771-6.
80. Chico A, Saigi I, Garcia-Patterson A et al. Glycemic control and perinatal outcomes of
pregnancies complicated by type 1 diabetes: influence of continuous subcutaneous insulin
and lispro insulin. 2010;12(12):937-45.
81. Durnwald CP, Landon MB. A comparison of lispro and regular insulin for the management of
type 1 and type 2 diabetes in pregnancy. 2008;21(5):309-13.
82. Mathiesen ER, Hod M, Ivanisevic M et al. Maternal efficacy and safety outcomes in a
randomized, controlled trial comparing insulin detemir with NPH insulin in 310 pregnant
women with type 1 diabetes. 2012;35(10):2012-7.
83. Pollex E, Moreti ME, Koren G et al. Safety of insulin glargine use in pregnancy: a systematic
review and meta-analysis. 2011;45(1):9-16.
84. Mecacci F, Carignani L, Cioni R et al. Maternal metabolic control and perinatal outcome in
women with gestational diabetes treated with regular or lispro insulin: comparison with non-
diabetic pregnant women. 2003;111(1):19-24.
85. Pettitt DJ, Ospina P, Kolaczynski JW et al. Comparison of an insulin analog, insulin aspart,
and regular human insulin with no insulin in gestational diabetes mellitus.
2003;26(1):183-6.
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 36/37
10/24/2019 Diabetes Mellitus
86. Briggs GG, Freeman RK, Towers CV.
. 11th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Wolters Kluwer; 2017.
87. Houlden RL. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and
management of diabetes in Canada: Introduction. 2018;42(Suppl 1):S1-5.
Available from: guidelines.diabetes.ca/cpg/chapter1. Accessed August 15, 2018.
88. Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ. The metabolic syndrome. 2005;365(9468):1415-
28.
89. Tuomilehto J, Lindstrom J, Eriksson JG et al. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by
changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance.
2001;344(18):1343-50.
90. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes
with lifestyle intervention or metformin. 2002;346(6):393-403.
91. Lindstrom J, Ilanne-Parikka P, Peltonen M et al. Sustained reduction in the incidence of type 2
diabetes by lifestyle intervention: follow-up of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study.
2006;368(9548):1673-9.
92. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group, Knowler WC, Fowler SE et al. 10-year follow-
up of diabetes incidence and weight loss in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes
Study. 2009;374(9702):1677-86.
93. Van de Laar FA, Lucassen PL, Akkermans RP et al. Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors for people
with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting blood glucose.
2006;(4):CD005061.
94. Gerstein HC, Yusuf S, Bosch J et al. Effect of rosiglitazone on the frequency of diabetes in
patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose: a randomised controlled
trial. 2006;368(9541):1096-105.
95. Buchanan TA, Xiang AH, Peters RK et al. Preservation of pancreatic beta-cell function and
prevention of type 2 diabetes by pharmacological treatment of insulin resistance in high-risk
Hispanic women. 2002;51(9):2796-803.
96. Knowler WC, Hamman RF, Edelstein SL et al. Prevention of type 2 diabetes with troglitazone
in the Diabetes Prevention Program. 2005;54(4):1150-6.
97. Zinman B, Harris SB, Neuman J et al. Low-dose combination therapy with rosiglitazone and
metformin to prevent type 2 diabetes mellitus (CANOE trial): a double-blind randomised
controlled study. 2010;376(9735):103-11.
98. Torgerson JS, Hauptman J, Boldrin MN et al. XENical in the prevention of diabetes in obese
subjects (XENDOS) study: a randomized study of orlistat as an adjunct to lifestyle changes for
the prevention of type 2 diabetes in obese patients. 2004;27(1):155-61.
99. Bosch J, Yusuf S, Gerstein HC et al. Effect of ramipril on the incidence of diabetes.
2006;355(15):1551-62.
100. Skyler JS. Prediction and prevention of type 1 diabetes: progress, problems, and prospects.
2007;81(5):768-71.
101. Goguen J, Gilbert J. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and
management of diabetes in Canada: Hyperglycemic emergencies in adults.
2018;42(Suppl 1):S109-14. Available from: guidelines.diabetes.ca/cpg/chapter15. Accessed
August 15, 2018.
102. Charles RA, Bee YM, Eng PH et al. Point-of-care blood ketone testing: screening for diabetic
ketoacidosis at the emergency department. 2007;48(11):986-9.
103. Naunheim R, Jang TJ, Banet G et al. Point-of-care test identifies diabetic ketoacidosis at
triage. 2006;13(6):683-5.
https://www.myrxtx.ca/print/new/documents/CHAPTER/en/diabetes_mellitus 37/37