The analytic rubric evaluates dioramas based on four criteria rated on a scale of 1 to 4:
1) Accuracy in depicting the source material and demonstrating comprehension.
2) Level of creativity and thought put into the diorama.
3) Quality of construction and use of interesting materials.
4) Clarity and preparation of the student presentation about the diorama.
The analytic rubric evaluates dioramas based on four criteria rated on a scale of 1 to 4:
1) Accuracy in depicting the source material and demonstrating comprehension.
2) Level of creativity and thought put into the diorama.
3) Quality of construction and use of interesting materials.
4) Clarity and preparation of the student presentation about the diorama.
The analytic rubric evaluates dioramas based on four criteria rated on a scale of 1 to 4:
1) Accuracy in depicting the source material and demonstrating comprehension.
2) Level of creativity and thought put into the diorama.
3) Quality of construction and use of interesting materials.
4) Clarity and preparation of the student presentation about the diorama.
4 3 2 1 Accuracy Diorama accurately Diorama depicts Diorama unclearly Diorama does not depicts source source material depicts source depict source material and shows and shows some material and shows material and no evidence of strong evidence of little evidence of evidence of comprehension comprehension comprehension comprehension is shown Creativity Diorama shows Diorama shows Diorama shows Diorama shows little great creativity and creativity and some creativity and to no creativity and thought, student thought, student thought thought created something created something completely new interesting using using source source material materials Construction Diorama is Diorama is well Diorama is sloppy, Diorama is not extremely well put- put-together, some materials are falling construct, everything together, used very interesting off and/or apart just thrown in interesting materials materials used without purpose Presentation Student spoke Student spoke Student was Student presentation credibly clearly, clearly, showed unclear when made little sense, no demonstrated great signs of practice speaking, showed evidence of practice confidence and little evidence of or preparation. practice preparation
Submitted by: Group 2
Members: Michelle Anne De Los Reyes
Sheena Mae De La Paz
Rodelyn Cusay Shannel Ann Villuga Madeleine Sabares