Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5/20
Mridul Crystelle Singh
18010237
Section E
Word Count :1134 (including in text citation)
Can CSR play a role to counterweigh the ill-effects of Covid-19 on the economy?
The tragedy of the commons is a problem in economics that occurs when individuals
neglect the well-being of society in the pursuit of personal gain. This leads to over-
consumption and ultimately depletion of the common resource, to everybody's detriment.
Garrett Hardin’s metaphorical pasture in ‘The tragedy of the commons’ allows us to think of
a world where rational individuals make profitable business decisions while being callous
about the cost borne by others due to their acts (Hardin,1968). Modern corporations continue
to graze in Hardin’s metaphorical pasture ; , negative externalites via such corporate
activities can be avoided or reduced by self -regulating model – corporate Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR).
CSR guides and directs business activity to promote social accountability and safeguarding,
to some extent third party interests such as the -environment, human rights issues, labour
protection, etc (Lin, 2020). Now imagine Hardin’s pasture being consumed by a deadly and
poisonous moss. Public Listed companies- ‘RJD RATA ’ and ‘Lambani’ have the option to
increase CSR spending to meet the need of the hour and invest in industrial quality
agricultural products , or on the other hand they have the rightful choice to reduce CSR
spending given lower annual profits of the company due to the deadly moss, they may even
fire their employees and leave them exposed to the poisonous fumes if the economic agent
wishes to do so. Today, as our world’s economy continues to crumble under the thumb of the
COVID-19 pandemic, it is important to realise the role and scope of CSR in combatting the
adverse effects inflicted upon society by the virus.
India’s CSR Trend In Terrible Times Of COVID-19
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs in March 2020 clarified that CSR funds for battling the
pandemic will be eligible to be considered within the ambit CSR activities. Companies with
pending CSR obligations saw this opportunity to redeem themselves by exhibiting the very
spirit behind section Section 135 and Schedule VII of the Companies Act 2013, as well as to
meet the statutory requirements under the section. The Modi Government amended the
aforementioned schedule of the CA to set up the PM Cares fund, and stated that the same was
done as “People …expressed their desire to donate to India’s war against COVID-19”. There
is a possibility that such amendment to the schedule may change the interpretation of CSR in
times to come.i The problem is that the MCA has time and again reiterated that CSR activities
should not be termed charity or donation, as that would break away from the intended spirit
embodied in the Act.
While Companies like Infosys Limited have according to a report spent close to Rs. 360
crores in CSR activities in 2020. (Thacker, 2021) This year the company’s CSR schemes in
majority were focused on COVID-19 relief funds. The company helped hospitals set up 100
bed quarantine facilities.ii Similarly 100’s of corporate giants came together within the first
few weeks and provided 6500 crores of CSR funding into the PM cares fund. It is interesting
to note that funding to State governments is not considered a part of CSR.iii
CSR policies in India are made in an ad-hoc manner, as we have seen in recent times.
Companies that did not have CSR policy to guide corporate activities found themselves
unable to cope with the pressures of the economic slowdown due to the pandemic. Lakhs of
employees have been asked to leave indefinitely as companies adjusts to lower profit
margins; CSR is not part of core business activity. The reality is that firms have had to slash
CSR due to COVID.iv
In Conclusion
I point to Carroll’s model of social responsibility (Srivastava et al., 2012) which provides a
hierarchy of responsibilities for Corporations when devising their CSR policy. The lowest in
this hierarchy is “discretionary responsibilities”. If we go back to my introduction, it is within
management discretion to have CSR policy lean towards Gandhian principles of Trusteeship
or ‘corporate altruism’. A Company like RJD RATA may have CSR policy that holds
morality at the core of its business, and hence in a way carries on its mission to use its wealth
for the welfare of society. Whereas Lambani’s CSR policy may echo the tunes of corporate
altruism, hence believing certain CSR spending absolves them of further responsibility to the
society.
References