Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/40293469?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
Society of American Archivists is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
The American Archivist
This content downloaded from 150.135.239.99 on Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:48:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
378 American Archivist / Vol. 53 / Summer 1990
Research Article
About the author: Kenneth E. Foote is an associate professor of geography at the University
Texas at Austin. He presented an earlier version of this article at the forty-ninth annual meeting
the Society of American Archivists in Austin, Texas, in October 1985.
This content downloaded from 150.135.239.99 on Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:48:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
To Remember and Forget 379
This content downloaded from 150.135.239.99 on Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:48:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
380 American Archivist / Summer 1990
This content downloaded from 150.135.239.99 on Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:48:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
To Remember and Forget 381
clear waste.
These radioactive
regarding byprodu
the location of waste deposits was
of weapons
production
seen as crucial to this and
goal. commer
power generation The require up
key to understanding the to ten th
interplay
of archives
sand years to decay intoand communication
less indangerous
this in-
topes. No solution has
stance lies yet
in the task been
force's pursuit of long- foun
lasting means
the problem of this of communication employ-
material's safe disp
ing for
Current plans call a variety ofitstransmission techniques.
solidification
burial deep in stable geologic
Durable physical formatio
markers at the storage sites
However, were seen
quite apart as a long-lasting,
from but insuffi-
uncertainty a
natural processescient,that might
technique (figure 1). It would be breach
im-
storage chambers, human
possible violation
to hope that such markers could of
waste dumps is an
retainimportant concern.
their meaning for three hundred gen-
erations, orthe
matter how securely that theywaste
would even remain
is store
is virtually impossible physically intact.
to After all, some of the people
prevent most f
disturbing the waste- durable building materials known are, by
intentionally or
intentionally-during the
virtue of their next
durability, ten
prime quarry for mille
If some of the buried waste becomes of scavengers. The task force therefore pro-
value to future generations, it may even beposed that other techniques be employed to
"mined," supplement the warning conveyed by phys-
Recognition of the dangers of possible ical markers.
human penetration of waste deposits led to Written documents maintained in on-site
vaults and off-site document collections
the formation of a Human Interference Task
Force by the U.S. Department of Energy would be the most important of these sup-
in 1980.7 The task force included special-plements. At the site of the waste deposit,
ists in semiotics and communication and written warnings could be placed in an
was charged with proposing long-term above-ground document vault to explain the
warning systems for disposal sites.8 It rec- nature and danger of the radioactive ma-
ognized from the start that disturbance of terials. In this way, detailed information
the sites by future generations could never about the design and layout of the storage
be completely prevented. Indeed, the task area would be available for careful study.
force was unwilling to assume responsibil- Future generations would be encouraged to
ity for safeguarding the waste from delib- periodically translate the documents from
erate violation. However, it did accept the their original languages into languages that
obligation to reduce the likelihood of in-
advertant, ill-informed penetration of the
storage areas.9 Long-term communication Waste Isolation, Human Interference Task Force, Re-
ducing the Likelihood of Future Human Activities That
Could Affect Geologic High- Level Waste Repositories
(Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Memorial Institute, 1984);
7Thc following discussion summarizes an argu- U.S. Department of Energy, Statement of Position of
ment found in Kenneth E. Foote, "Object as Mem-the U.S. Department of Energy in the Matter of Pro-
ory: The Material Foundations of Human Semiosis,"posed U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rule-
Semiotica 69 (1988): 253-59. making on the Storage and Disposal of Nuclear Waste
8Thomas A. Sebeok, Communication Measures to (Waste Confidence Rulemaking) (Washington, D.C.:
Bridge Ten Millennia (Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Me-Department of Energy, 1980); U.S. Environmental
morial Institute, Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation,Protection Agency, "Environmental Standards for the
1984) and Percy H. Tannenbaum, CommunicationManagement and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-
Across 300 Generations: Deterring Human Interfer-Level and Transuranic Waste," Federal Register 47,
ence with Waste Deposit Sites (Columbus, Ohio: Bat-29 December 1982, 53196. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
telle Memorial Institute, Office of Nuclear WasteCommission, "Disposal of High-Level Radioactive
Isolation, 1984). Wastes in Geologic Repositories, Technical Crite-
9Battelle Memorial Institute, Office of Nuclear ria," Federal Register 48, 21 June 1983, 28194.
This content downloaded from 150.135.239.99 on Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:48:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
382 American Archivist / Summer 1990
This content downloaded from 150.135.239.99 on Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:48:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
To Remember and Forget 383
This content downloaded from 150.135.239.99 on Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:48:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
384 American Archivist / Summer 1990
This content downloaded from 150.135.239.99 on Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:48:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
To Remember and Forget 385
This content downloaded from 150.135.239.99 on Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:48:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
386 American Archivist / Summer 1990
In Germany,
district as an intentional means of course,
ofthis active ef-
breaking
facement
apart this stigmatized area.of buildings
The has been matched
site of the by
Gestapo headquarters remains vacant more
than forty years after the building's de-
struction. In Berlin, topic
thisof debateconscious
in Germany and is discussed in Rein-
efface-
hard Rürup, ed., Topographie des Terrors: Gestapo,
ment of buildings was based on SS und Reichssicherheitshauptamt auf dem "Prinz-
renouncement of this vicious genocidal ep- Albrecht-Gelände'* (Berlin: Verlag Willmuth Aren-
isode, as well as on the belief that efface- hövel, 1987); Gottfried Korff and Reinhard Rürup,
eds., Berlin, Berlin: Die Ausstellung zur Geschichte
ment would waylay attempts to create pro- der Stadt (Berlin: Nicolai, 1987), 543-60; and Be-
Nazi monuments. The destruction of Span- nedikt Erenz, "Der Ort, der Stört," Die Zeit, 9 Sep-
dau Prison, following the death of Rudolphtember 1988. Debate about the disposition of this
"landscape of terror" is closely related to attempts
Hess, was predicated on the latter motive. by Germans to come to terms with the Nazi legacy,
Some Germans go so far as to call for the a topic discussed by Lucy S. Dawidowicz, The Hol-
razing of all remaining Nazi buildings, such ocaust and the Historians (Cambridge, Mass.: Har-
vard University Press, 1981) and Richard J. Evans,
as the libraries and galleries that still stand In Hitler's Shadow: West German Historians and the
in Berlin and elsewhere.24 Attempt to Escape from the Nazi Past (London: I.B.
Tauris and Co. Ltd., 1989). This debate is likely to
increase in intensity in the wake of East and West
German unification; many sites are likely to be reap-
24The fate of these sites of Nazi terror is an active praised in light of this development.
This content downloaded from 150.135.239.99 on Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:48:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
To Remember and Forget 387
the demand that sites of Nazi atrocities be of a site to the memory of an event, martyr,
memorialized for eternity. Without ques- great individual, or group of victims. Des-
tion, the Holocaust has inspired some of ignation revolves around the marking of an
the most forceful memorials of modern times exceptional event without the religious
(figure 3). The pressure to sustain these sa- overtones borne of sanctification. Rectifi-
cred places is growing ever stronger as cation occurs, generally, after accidental
members of the last generation of Holo- tragedy, when a place or building is "put
caust survivors seek, in their remaining right" and reused. As was noted above for
years, to leave enduring testimony to the Salem and Berlin, effacement occurs both
evil of the Holocaust. actively and passively after particularly
These cases bring to mind other events shameful events and involves obliteration
of violence and tragedy where calls for of the evidence of violence.
monuments divide opinion and provoke The most striking aspect of all four out-
heated public debate. Generally, this de- comes is the length of time required for
bate is resolved in favor of one of four out- transformation to occur. Even in cases where
comes for landscape: sanctification, tragedy sites become transfigured into
designation, rectification, or effacement. As shrines of national, state, or civic identity,
was the case above with respect to concen- their sanctification frequently involves a
tration camps, sanctification entails con- lengthy struggle. In the first place, as many
struction of a memorial- perhaps a building, historians have noted, historical concep-
monument, or park - and ritual dedication tions of a national past are almost entirely
Figure 3. The rail siding leading to the Nazi death camp at Auschwitz. Memorials to the victims
of the Holocaust are among the most compelling reminders of twentieth-century genocide. In Berlin
and elsewhere, symbols of Nazi power were effaced.
This content downloaded from 150.135.239.99 on Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:48:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
388 American Archivist / Summer 1990
came
retrospective and take timeinterested in The
to evolve.25 identif
of the
American Revolutionary and struggle. Second,
Civil Wars had a
to be won, for instance, above, tragedies
before people carry
be- i
meaning and people may
tify sites of tragedy with
25Some of the most useful sources in this large lit- preting their meaning. Th
erature are Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger, eds.,
a tragedy usually must pa
The Invention of Tradition (Cambridge: Cambridge
nificance can be assessed and its site sanc-
University Press, 1983); George Allan, The Impor-
tances of the Past: A Meditation on the Authority of tified. As a consequence, years or decades
Tradition (Albany: State University of New York Press,
may pass before sites achieve the status of
1986); Bernard Lewis, History: Remembered, Re-
covered, Invented (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Uni- national shrines. Until then, the sites may
versity Press, 1975); Richard Johnson, Gregor lie abandoned and virtually ignored.
McLennan, Bill Schwarz, and David Sutton, eds.,
Nowadays, the Boston Massacre of 1770
Making Histories: Studies in History- Writing and Pol-
is viewed as the first act of violence of the
itics (London: Hutchinson, 1982); Michael Kämmen,
Selvages and Biases: The Fabric of History in Amer- Revolutionary War era, but more than one
ican Culture (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, hundred years passed before it was per-
1987); John Lukacs, Historical Consciousness, or,
The Remembered Past (New York: Harper and Row, manently marked (figure 4). Even after this
1968); Patricia N. Limerick, The Legacy of Conquest: was accomplished, people argued against
The Unbroken Past of the American West (New York:
the marker on the grounds that the massa-
Norton, 1987); and Paul Thompson, The Voice of the
Past: Oral History, 2nd Edition (New York: Oxford cre was little more than a street fight, an
University Press, 1988). undignified provocation of British troops
This content downloaded from 150.135.239.99 on Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:48:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
To Remember and Forget 389
This content downloaded from 150.135.239.99 on Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:48:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
390 American Archivist / Summer 1990
This content downloaded from 150.135.239.99 on Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:48:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
To Remember and Forget 391
This content downloaded from 150.135.239.99 on Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:48:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
392 American Archivist / Summer 1990
This content downloaded from 150.135.239.99 on Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:48:51 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms