You are on page 1of 1

Training & Testing 819

were to significantly account for match running performance, Under 13 to Under 18 in an elite soccer academy (● ▶ Table 1). All

irrespective of playing positions [10, 23, 34], centre-backs would the players participated on average in ~14 h of combined soccer-
be expected to consistently present the poorest physical tests specific training and competitive play per week (6–8 soccer
results, and conversely, midfielders and attackers, the best ones. training sessions, 1 strength training session, 1–2 conditioning
While between-position differences in physical capacities have sessions, 1 domestic game per week and 2 international club
been reported for some physical capacities [15, 22, 44], such dif- games every 3 weeks). All players had a minimum of 3 years of
ferences are not always apparent [20] or even absent [41]. For prior soccer-specific training. Written informed consent was
example, while fullbacks performed more distance in the Yo-Yo obtained from the players and their parents. The study was per-
test than attackers [22], the mean sprint time on the RSA test formed in accordance with the ethical standards of the IJSM [16]
conducted by Impellizzeri et al. [20] did not discriminate full- and conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki.
backs, midfielders and forwards, despite the important differ-
ences in their match running performance [5, 13, 14, 35]. It is Anthropometric measurements and maturity
therefore unclear to what extent physical fitness and/or specific assessment
technical/tactical roles assigned to each playing position and Height (Harpenden, Baty International, Burguess Hill, U.K.), body
playing style can dictate player’s running activity during the mass (ADE Electronic Column Scales, Hamburg, Germany) and
game. In addition, given the reported existence of different posi- the sum of 7 skinfold sites (triceps, subscapular, biceps, suprasp-
tion-specific running patterns [13], it is also unclear which phys- inale, abdominal, thigh and medial calf; Harpenden skinfold
ical capacities (e. g., lower limb explosive strength, maximal caliper (Baty International, Burguess Hill, U.K.) were measured
aerobic function, RSA [34]) are related with match running per- by an experienced tester [26]. Although the teams differed in
formance for a given playing position. chronological age, the possibility of an overlapping of some play-
The purpose of this study was therefore to 1) examine for the first ers’ maturity status was likely given the heterogeneity of bio-
time match running performance in a wide age range of highly logical and physical maturity of children around puberty [25].
trained young soccer players as a function of age and playing posi- The age at peak height velocity (PHV) is an indicator of somatic
tion, 2) determine whether individual differences in match run- maturity representing the time of maximum growth in stature
ning performances are related to differences in physical capacities during adolescence. Maturity timing (yr) was calculated by sub-
(as evidenced via field tests results), and 3) evaluate the magni- tracting the chronological age at the time of measurement from
tude of these relationships for each separate playing position. the age at estimated PHV [28].

Experimental procedures
Methods Match analyses were performed on 42 matches against interna-
▼ tional club teams, played over a 4-month period. Each outfield
Subjects player was assessed 1–9 times. The high level of the opposing
Time-motion match analysis data was collected on 99 young teams and the same competition format likely reduced match-
football players belonging to 6 different age groups ranging from

Table 1 Physical capacities and match running performance according to age.

U13 U14 U15 U16 U17 U18 η2


anthropometric, maturity data and physical capacities
number of players n=7 n = 17 n = 10 n = 12 n = 17 n = 14
year from PHV − 1.7 ± 0.4a,b,c,d,e − 0.7 ± 0.5c,d,e − 0.1 ± 0.7d,e 0.6 ± 0.8d,e 1.6 ± 0.6e 2.2 ± 0.4 0.83
height (cm) 150 ± 6a,b,c,d,e 159 ± 7d,e 161 ± 6d,e 163 ± 9 170 ± 7 171 ± 9 0.58
body mass (kg) 39.3 ± 5.1b,c,d,e 43.9 ± 5.2d,e 48.8 ± 9.8d 52.0 ± 7.2 58.1 ± 4.7 56.3 ± 7.5 0.51
CMJ (cm) saritura in inaltime 27.5 ± 2.5a,b,c,d,e 32.0 ± 3.1b,c,d,e 39.2 ± 4.1d,e 37.9 ± 3.7d,e 42.6 ± 4.0 44.5 ± 5.2 0.69
Acc (s) 10m 1.96 ± 0.07a,b,c,d,e 1.89 ± 0.06b,c,d,e 1.79 ± 0.08d,e 1.77 ± 0.05e 1.74 ± 0.04 1.71 ± 0.06 0.67
−1
PV (km.h ) V max 40m 25.4 ± 0.7a,b,c,d,e 27.0 ± 1.5 b,c,d,e
29.0 ± 1.8 d,e
29.4 ± 1.0d,e 31.3 ± 0.7e 32.3 ± 1.9 0.74
RSA media a10x30m cu pauza 30 sec 5.15 ± 0.08a,b,c,d,e 4.88 ± 0.16b,c,d,e 4.60 ± 0.20d,e 4.51 ± 0.12e 4.39 ± 0.12 4.31 ± 0.17 0.78
VVam-eval (km.h − 1) VMA-ul 13.7 ± 0.8a,b,c,d,e 15.3 ± 1.4d,e 15.8 ± 1.3e 15.8 ± 1.1e 16.6 ± 0.9 17.4 ± 0.9 0.51
match running performance
number of files n = 18 files n = 40 files n = 25 files n = 21 files n = 29 files n = 53 files
playing time 2 × 35 min 2 × 35 min 2 × 40 min 2 × 40 min 2 × 40 min 2 × 45 min
TD (m) 6549 ± 597a,b,c,d,e 7383 ± 640b,c,d,e 8129 ± 879e 8312 ± 1054 8707 ± 1101 8867 ± 859 0.44
LIR (m) 0-13 km/h 5370 ± 470b,c,d,e 5799 ± 454b,c,d,e 6288 ± 610 6480 ± 845 6749 ± 768 6650 ± 565 0.36
HIR (m)13-16 km/h 671 ± 180b,c,d,e 821 ± 231 954 ± 297 968 ± 258 991 ± 370 976 ± 240 0.28
VHIR (m) 16-19 km/h 323 ± 87b,c,d,e 446 ± 162e 477 ± 156 479 ± 180 519 ± 155 574 ± 134 0.20
Sprinting (m) peste 19km/h 186 ± 92b,c,d,e 318 ± 183e 410 ± 204e 384 ± 163e 449 ± 147e 666 ± 256 0.39
VHIA (m) 509 ± 156a,b,c,d,e 763 ± 307 d,e
887 ± 311 e
864 ± 314e 967 ± 221e 1239 ± 337 0.39
peak game speed (km.h − 1) 22.3 ± 1.4a,b,c,d,e 24.4 ± 1.8b,c,d,e 26.0 ± 2.4e 26.3 ± 2.3e 26.6 ± 2.2e 28.3 ± 2.2 0.45
Mean ( ± SD) values of anthropometric and match running performances and least squared means ( ± SE) of physical capacities of the Under 13 (U13), Under 14 (U14), Under 15
(U15), Under 16 (U16), Under 17 (U17) and Under 18 (U18) soccer players. PHV peak height velocity. Field tests: counter movement jump (CMJ), acceleration (Acc), peak veloc-
ity (PV), mean sprint time on the repeated sprint test (RSAmean) and peak running speed during the incremental field test (VVam-eval). Match running performance: total distance
covered (TD), low-intensity running (LIR; running speed < 13.0 km · h − 1 ), high-intensity running (HIR; running speed from 13.1 to 16 km · h − 1 ), very high-intensity running
(VHIR; running speed from 16.1 to 19 km · h − 1 ) and sprinting distance (Sprinting; running speed > 19.1 km · h − 1 ). Very high-intensity activities (VHIA) = VHIR + Sprinting. Main
age-group effect: all P < 0.001. a: significant difference vs. U14 (P < 0.05), b: vs. U15, c: vs. U16, d: vs. U17, e: vs. U18. η2 : effect size

Buchheit M et al. Match Running Performance and Fitness in Youth Soccer. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31: 818–825

You might also like