You are on page 1of 6

Sunday, October 28, 2001 IEEE-NAN0 2001

S1.l Nanomagnetics I (Special session)

Magnetic Field Dependence of Electron Energy States in 3D Nano-Scopic


Quantum Rings
C. P. Lee2, Cheng Feng Shih2,S. M. Sze*’2,and 0. Tretyak3
Yiming Li’,*,0. Voskob~ynikov~’~,
‘National Nano Device Laboratories, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
’Department of Electi-onics Engineering, National Chiao Tung Universicv, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
jKiev Tarus Shevchenko Universitv, 64 Volodvmirska St., 01033, Kiev, Ukraine
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 25-178, Hinchu city, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan; Email: .vinli@cc.nctu.edir.tM.

Abstract flux and unusual excitation properties in such non-


simply connected quantum structure systems determine
We study theoretically the electron energy states for their important interests to nano-scopic semiconductor
realistic models in 3D nano-scopic semiconductor quantum ring.
quantum rings. The effective one-band Hamiltonian Most of theoretical quantum ring models so far are
approximation and the Ben Daniel-Duke boundary only assuming electrons move in a 2D plane confined
conditions are considered simultaneously in the model by a parabolic potential (see for instance [I] and
formulation. The proposed model problem is solved references therein). Unfortunately, those reported
numerically by using central difference scheme with models above do not consider at least two important
non-uniform meshing technique, shifted and balanced properties of semiconductor quantum ring: (1) effect of
QR algorithm, and inverse iteration method. It is found the inner radius of the ring, and (2) the finite hard wall
that calculation results strongly depend on the radial confinement potential. In this work, we propose a more
cross shapes of InAs/GaAs quantum rings. The complete theoretical description for electron and hole
dependence of energy states on an external magnetic energy states in nano-rings. It leads to a 3D nonlinear
field for 3D nano-scopic quantum ring indicates there model problem and is solved with full numerical
is a significant difference among those reported results approach.
with simplified 1D or 2D approaches in literature. In this study, based on the effective 3D one band
Simulation results demonstrate very good consistence Hamiltonian, the energy (non-parabolic) and position
with the experimental data. dependent quasi-particle effective mass approximation,
the finite hard wall confinement potential, and the Ben
Daniel-Duke boundary conditions, the model is
1. Introduction formulated for realistic 3D InAs/GaAs semiconductor
quantum rings. To solve the multi-dimensional
Recent advance in nano-scopic semiconductor nonlinear Schrodinger equation, we present a nonlinear
structure fabrication has allowed us to construct nano- iterative scheme to compute the final “self-consistent”
scopic systems with a wide range of geometries solution of the problem. In each iterative loop, the
including nano-scopic InGaAs quantum rings [ 1-71. eigenvalue and eigenhnction of the Schrodinger
Electron quantum confinement effects have been equation are obtained with the central difference
received great interests recently and they are now being method [12, 131, shifted and balanced QR algorithm
under more extensive investigations in, such as [14-161, and inverse iteration method [16, 171.
quantum wells, wires, and dots [8-111 simultaneously. We find a significant difference between our 3D
Although micro-scopic and meso-scopic metallic, and results and those results that are from a simplified 2D
semiconductor quantum rings have been received a (or 1D) calculation. In contrast to those conventional
considerable attention in recent years, the development simple calculations, our approach describe well-known
in semiconductor nano-scopic ring fabrication bridges non-periodic Aharonov-Bohm oscillations for nano-
the gap between quantum dots and meso-scopic ring scopic semiconductor quantum ring successfully. This
structures. The possibility of trapping a single magnetic paper is organized as follows. Sec. 2 introduces the
theoretical model for the three-dimensional nano-
scopic semiconductor quantum rings. The proposed
* Corresponding author. Yiming Li is with the nonlinear iterative method and computer simulation
Microelectronics and Information Systems Research Center, techniques are introduced in Sec.3. In Sec. 4 we
National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan. Tel.: describe the calculation results and discussion. Sec. 5
+886-3-5712121 ext. 52974; fax: +886-3-5750440. draws the conclusion.

0-7803-7215-8/01/$10.0002001 IEEE. 11
IEEE-NAN0 2001 Sunday, October 28, 2001
S1.l Nanomagnetics I (Special session)

2. Three-Dimensional Modeling of the the Pauli matrixes, mo and e are the free electron
Semiconductor Quantum Rings elementary mass and charge.
From integration of the Shrodinger equation with
We consider semiconductor quantum rings with the Hamiltonian ( 1) along direction perpendicular to the
hard-wall confinement potential that is induced by a interface (r,) of materials, we obtain the following spin
discontinuity of conduction band edge of the system dependent Ben Daniel-Duke boundary conditions for
components. This approach is commonly used to the electron wave function Y(r) between different
calculate electron energy levels in quantum structure materials [ 181
heterostructures [ 181. With this approach, we solve 3D
nonlinear Shrodinger equation directly without any
additional simplifications and approximations. It is an
important point and should be considered that the
approximations . of material basic parameters in the
study of nano-scopic semiconductor quantum rings.
For 3D semiconductor quantum structures in a
magnetic field B, the approximated effective electron where rs denotes the position of the system interface.
one band Hamiltonian is as follows
Z

t
where

l7, = -iAvr + eA(r) (2)

stands for the electron momentum vector, Vr is the


spatial gradient, A(r) is the vector potential, and /
magnetic field
X
B = Curl A.

The m(E, r) and g(E, r) are energy and position


(3)
i
dependent electron effective mass

1 2

+ 1
E - Eg(r) - V(r) + A(r)

and Lande factor


I (4)

X
)Y

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram for semiconductor quantum


ring structures. Two different shapes quantum
ring, one is ellipsoid shape 3D quantum ring
g(E,r) = 2{ 1 - 2 (above) and the other is rectangular shape 3D
m(E, r) 3(E + E , (r)) + 2A(r) quantum ring (below).

respectively. In above Eqs., V(r) is the confinement For quantum systems with sharp discontinuity of the
potential, E , (r) and A(r) are the position dependent conduction band edge between the inner region Of the
ring (material 1) and environmental crystal matrix
band gap and spin-orbit splitting in the valence band, p (material 2), the hard-wall confinement potential can
is the momentum matrix element, (r is the vector of be presented as follows

0-7803-7215-8/01/$10.0002001 IEEE. 12
Sunday, October 28, 2001 IEEE-NAN0 200
S1.l Nanomagnetics I (Special session)

0,rc 1 eB
V(r) = (7) Sr;(E)= -. (1 1)
V o , r e 2. m; ( E )
The Vo in Eq. (7) stands for the band offset. We The boundary conditions between the material 1 and
consider a torus shaped quantum ring, which is material 2 can be written as the following:
generated by rotation of a generating contour about z-
axis. When the magnetic field is directed along z-axis,
we can treat the problem in cylindrical
coordinates ( p , @ , z ) .The generating contour, as shown
in Fig. 1, can be chosen as a rectangle [ 191 or ellipse. where z = , f s ( p )and
From the fabrication point of view, the ellipsoidal
shape is most realistic structure [I]. We compare for
the first time the simulation results for these two
different structures in this work. The original location
of the quantum system is lying at the center of the ring.
On viewing the fact that quantum ring systems are
cylindrical symmetry, the wave function can be
represented as

where z = f ,(p) presents the contour of the cross


where / = 0,+1,+2;.. is the orbital quantum number. section of quantum ring structures on the { p , z } plane.
We note the effective mass, Lande factor as well as The ring structures are generated by the rotation of this
confinement potential are coordinate dependent and the contour around the z-axis.
original model remains a two-dimensional problem in
( p ,z ) coordinates
3. Computer Simulation Technique

The electron effective mass and Lande factor in this


model are spatial and energy dependent functions, so it
makes the Shrodinger equation itself and the boundary
conditions are nonlinear in energy.
To obtain a “self-consistent” solution of the model,
we propose here a nonlinear iterative algorithm as
shown in Fig. 2 . The feedback nonlinear iteration
scheme is: (a) Set an initial energy Eo, (b) Compute
effective mass m, (c) Compute Lande factor g, (d)
where p and z belong to region of material 1, Solve Schrodinger equation with boundary conditions
for energy E, (e) Back to step (b). The iteration loops
similarly and will be terminated when a specified stopping criterion
on energy is reached.
This novel nonlinear iterative scheme has been
implemented and tested successfully in semiconductor
quantum ring simulation. To solve the Schrodinger
equation in step (d) a finite difference method with
nonuniform mesh [12, 131, balanced and shifted QR
algorithm [ 14-161, and inverse iteration technique [ 16,
171 are applied in this work. The discretized
Shrodinger equation with its boundary conditions leads
to the eigenvalue problem

where p and z belong to region of material 2. The s in


Eqs. (9) and (10) refers to the orientation of the
electron spin along z-axis and Sr is given by

0-7803-7215-8/01/$10.0002001 IEEE. 13
IEEE-NAN0 2001 Sunday, October 28, 2001
S1.l Nanornagnetics I (Special session)

where A is the matrix rising from the discretized As shown in Fig. 3, for a typical 3D InAs/GaAs
Shrodinger equation as well as its boundary conditions, quantum ring simulation, the achieved convergence
X and A are the corresponding eigenvectors (wave property demonstrates the proposed nonlinear iterative
functions) and the eigenvalues (energy states) of the method is an efficient and robust solution methodology,
matrix A , respectively. A shifted and balanced QR and it converges monotonically. A strict convergence
method is applied to compute the eigenvalues of the criterion on energy (e.g., the maximum norm error is
matrix A . The matrix A , in general, is a non symmetric less than lo'* eV) is reached by taking only 9-10
and large sparse matrix, the eigenvalues of such matrix feedback nonlinear iterations.
can be very sensitive to small changes in the matrix
elements. In order to reduce the sensitivity of
eigenvalues, we perform a balancing algorithm [ 161 to
matrix A . Then the next strategy for finding the
eigenvalue of the balanced matrix A is transferring it -
into a simpler form, Hessenberg form, with a sequence i5 le-3 -
of Householder transformations. The eigenvalues of the c

Hessenberg matrix are directly computed with QR gE le4 -


method [14-161. le-5 -
b
C le-6 -
E' le-7 -
2 lea -

3
-
Set initial energy le-10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Number of iterations
Fig. 3. A convergence behavior of the proposed
Compute rn(E,v) nonlinear iterative scheme for semiconductor
I quantum ring simulation.

4. Calculation Results and Discussion


In this section, we focus the discussions on our
simulation results for InAs/GaAs quantum rings with
the material parameters. For InAs, the energy gap E l , is
Update newer energy 0.42 eV, A I is 0.38 eV, m l ( 0 )= 0.024in0. For GaAs we
choose: E?,-= 1.52 eV, A? = 0.34 eV, mI(0) = 0.067mo.
The band offset parameter is taken as V ,= 0.77 eV.
Here we present our calculation results for a
quantum ring with height H = 2.0 nm and radial width

1 Compute
wave function
Fig. 2. A nonlinear iterative solution procedure for
AR = 20.0 nm. Firstly, we compare the calculated
ground state energy for various quantum rings at zero
external magnetic field B with the same material
semiconductor quantum ring simulation. parameters and sizes. The ground state energies are
computed with three different models: (a) a simple 2D
When the eigenvalues are found, we solve the model (so-called adiabatic approach) [19], (b) a 3D
corresponding eigenvectors with the inverse iteration model with rectangular shape quantum ring [20]; (c) a
method [16, 171. The fundamental idea of this inverse 3D model with ellipsoid shape quantum ring.
iteration method is to solve the linear system Fig. 4 shows the ground energy state dependence on
the inner radius ( R , ) of the ring. It is clearly that we can
see that there is a large discrepancy between these two-
and three- dimensional approaches. The difference in
where b is a trial vector and 5 is one of the computed energy is drastically increased when the ring size is
decreased. This is a direct result that the effective
eigenvalues of matrix A . The solution y is right the confinement increases from approach (a) to (c). To
candidate eigenvector corresponding to 5 . model the energy states for nano-scopic semiconductor

0-7803-7215-8/01/$10.0002001 IEEE. 14
Sunday, October 28,2001 IEEE-NAN0 2001
Sl.l Nanomagnetics I (Special session)

quantum rings, our calculation results suggest it is This transition is related to the persistent current in
necessary to choose a proper 3D quantum ring the ring structure and the Aharonov-Bohm oscillations.
simulation and the ring shape. The most realistic ring Furthermore, in 3D nano-scopic semiconductor
shape from the fabrication point of view is the 3D quantum ring the crossing point between I = 0 and I = -
ellipsoid shape model [l]. 1 states occurs where a typical applied magnetic flux

392
-- - - e Qc = x ( R , + M ) ’ B - 0.65Q0
3D ellipsoidal

390 1 is substantially larger than Qo / 2 ( Qo is the quantum


5- 388 of magnetic flux). The commonly quoted Qo/ 2 value
- - follows from elementary one- and two-dimensional
3D rectangular descriptions [21]. In addition, it follows from Fig. 5
that the oscillations are non-periodic and do not obey
the following well-known rule for one-dimensional

382
380
t model:

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 Qc /a”= 11,


R, (A0)
Fig. 4. Quantum ring ground state energy with where n is an integer number. The calculation results
different simulation models. It shows the presented in this work are in a good agreement with
relationship between energy and inner experimental data [ l , 211. It also demonstrates the
radius of the ring. importance of the three-dimensional model and
simulation in the characteristics and physics of nano-
scopic semiconductor quantum rings.
We further investigate the electron energy state
dependence on an external magnetic field B as it is
presented in Fig. 5. The magnetic field can induce a 5. Conclusion
transition between configurations with the lowest
electronic energy state corresponds to the electron In this work we have calculated single electron
angular momentum 1 = 0 and spin cr = +1/2, and the energy states for a realistic three-dimensional model of
lowest electronic energy state corresponds to the InAs/GaAs quantum rings with ellipsoid shape. The 3D
electron angular momentum I = -1 and spin (r = +1/2 model has been solved numerically with our proposed
(see Fig. 5). nonlinear iterative solution techniques successfully.
The simulation results demonstrate a good consistence
with experimental measurement and also have been
compared comprehensively with those simplified
models, such as 1D and 2D models, or 3D model with
non-realistic rectangular shape assumption to show the
necessity of the realistic 3D model.
To formulate the theoretical model, we use the
effective three-dimensional one band Hamiltonian, the
energy (non-parabolic) and position dependent quasi-
particle effective mass approximation, and the Ben
Daniel-Duke boundary conditions with the finite hard
wall confinement potential. In the calculation of the
final “self-consistent” solution of the model, a novel
380 nonlinear iterative scheme has been proposed and
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 implemented successfully in quantum ring simulation.
B (T) The energy states and wave functions are found by
Fig. 5. The electron energy state dependence on an using the central finite difference with non-uniform
external magnetic field B. meshing rule, a shifted and balanced QR algorithm,
and inverse iteration method.

0-7803-721 IEEE.
5-8/01/$10.0002001 15
IEEE-NAN0 2001 Sunday, October 28,2001
S1.l Nanomagnetics I (Special session)

We have found that there is a big discrepancy among [6] P. Pietilainen, V. Halonen, Tapash Chakraborty,
our results and those results follow from the simplified Electron corrections in quantum ring and dot
1D or 2D calculations. In contrast to those simple systems, Ph-vsica B, 212: 256-260, August 1995.
calculations the proposed 3D approach and simulation [7] T. Ando, Y. Arakawa, K. Furuta, S. Komiyama, H.
results presented here describe the well-known non- Nakashima (Eds.), Mesoscopic Ph-vsics and
periodic Aharonov-Bohm oscillations come from Electronics, Springer, Berlin, 1998.
experimental measurement for nano-scopic quantum
[8] D.K. Ferry and S.M. Goodnick, Transpoi-t in
rings successfully.
Finally, we would like to point out that the 3D model, Nanostructures, Cambridge University Press, New
York, 1997.
solution techniques, and calculation results presented
here can be used as a starting point for further [9] M.J. Kelly, Lowdimensional Semiconductom:
theoretical investigations of the energy states in nano- Material, Ph-vsics, Technology, Devices, Oxford
scopic semiconductor quantum rings. The multi- University Press, Oxford, 1995.
dimensional nonlinear Schrodinger equation combined [ 101D. Bimberg, M. Grundmann, N.N. Ledentsov
with the self-consistent potential and the multi-band (Eds.), Quantum Dot Heterostructures, Wiley,
approaches also should be further considered to make Chichester, 1998.
more proper quantitative calculations in the study of [ 1 11D. Bimberg, Quantum dots: Paradigm changes in
nano-scopic semiconductor quantum rings. semiconductor physics, Semiconductors 33
(9):951-955, September 1999.
[ 121R. S. Varga, Matrix Iterative Ana/vsis, Prentice-
Acknowledgments Hall, 2000.
[ 131W. F. Ames, Numerical Methods for Par-tial
This work was supported in part by the National
Differential Equations, Academic Press, 1992.
Science Council of Taiwan under NSC contract
number NSC89-22 18-E009-055. [ 141D. S. Watkins, QR-like algorithms for eigenvalue
problems, Journal of Computational and Applied
Matheinatics, 123 (1 -2): 67-83, November 2000.
References [15]G. H. Golub and C.F. Van Loan, Matrix
Computations, The Hohns Hopkins University
Press, 1996.
[ l ] A. Lorke, R. J. Luyken, A. 0. Govorov, and J. P.
Kotthaus, Spectroscopy of Nanoscopic [ 161J. H. Wilkinson and C. Reinsch, Linear Algebra ZZ
of Handbook for Automatic Computation,
Semiconductor Rings, Ph-ysical Review Letter, 84
(10): 2223-2226, March 2000. Springer-Verlag, 1971.
[17]I. C. F. Ipsen, Computing an Eigenvector with
[2] H. Pettersson, R. J. Waburton, A. Lorke, K. Karrai,
Inverse Iteration, SIAM Review 39 (2): 254-291,
J. P. Kotthaus, J. M. Garcia, and P. M. Petroff,
Excitons in Self-Assembled Quantum Ring-Like June 1997.
Structures, Physica E , 6 (1-4): 510-513, February [ 181G. Bastard, Wave Mechanics Applied to
2000. Semiconductor Heterostructures, Les Edition de
Physique, Les Ulis, 1990.
[3] R.J. Warburton, C. Schaflein, D. Haft, F. Bickel; A.
Lorke, K. Karrai, J.M. Garcia, W. Schoenfeld, P.M. [19] W.C. Tan and J.C. Inkson, Electron states in a
Petroff, Optical emission from single, charge- two-dimensional ring-an exactly soluble model,
tunable quantum rings, Physica E, 9 (1-4): 124- Semiconductor Science and Technology 11: 1635-
130, January 2000. 1641, 1996.
[4] A. Lorke and R. J. Luyken, Many-particle ground [20] A. Bruno-Alfonso and A. Latge, Semiconductor
states and excitations in nanometer-size quantum Quantum Rings: Shallow-Donors levels, Ph.vs. Rev.
structures, Physica B: 266-258, December 1998. B, 61(23): 15887-15894, June 2000.
[5] J. M. Garcia, G. Medeiros-Ribeiro, K. Schmidt, T. [21]A. Emperador, M. Pi, M. Barraco, and A. Lorke,
Ngo, J. L. Feng, A. Lorke, J. Kotthaus, and P. M. Far-Infrared Spectroscopy of Nanoscopic InAs
Petroff, Intermixing and shape changes during the Rings, Ph-vsical Review B, 62(7), 4573-4577,
formation of InAs self-assembled quantum dots, August 2000.
Applied Physics Letter, 71: 2014-2016, October
1997.

0-7803-7215-8/01/$10.0002001 IEEE. 16

You might also like