Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A-Level Research Methods Revison Cards
A-Level Research Methods Revison Cards
Q. What are the 6 ethical Q: Explain what is meant by Q. Explain what is meant by
issues? a Quasi Experiment. confounding variable
Mean – is the average calculated by (+) Relatively easy as the only Validity is concerned with
adding all data points up and dividing preparation needed is to place accuracy. It includes whether
by the number that there are. adverts and then participants
the study has measured what it
Mode – most frequent score in a data contact them to take part.
set. (-) likely to be biased and not apply
intended to measure (internal)
Median – is the middle value in a ranked to target pop as only helpful people and whether results can be
(from lowest to highest) data set. will apply. generalised (external).
(+) It isn’t affected by extreme (+) It is quick and easy and requires
A research method conducted in no prior preparation because it uses
values.
a controlled setting whereby the those available at time of testing.
(-) It is unrepresentative of all
research manipulates the IV and (-) It is likely to be biased as certain
data points as it focuses on only types of people will be unavailable
measures the DV. EV’s are
the most frequent value and and so may not apply to target
controlled.
ignores the others. population.
Q. In an observation you
Q. What are the two can do two different types
Q. What is mundane
different types of order of sampling to decide what
realism?
effects? behaviour to observe. What
are they?
Q. What measures of
central tendency and
Q. What is the range? Q. What is a confederate?
dispersion are used with
each level of measurement?
Counterbalancing
All participants receive the Double Blind
Some sit condition A first and
same instructions, researcher,
some sit condition B first.
methods etc. Used to avoid Keeps aims hidden from
It balances order effects out,
issues with internal reliability researcher collecting data and
so effect both conditions
or extraneous variables. participants.
equally.
Q. Give one advantage and Q. Give one advantage and
Q. What is the null
one disadvantage of using a one disadvantage of
hypothesis?
correlation. quantitative data.
Q. What is the difference Q. What is the difference Q. What are the different
between a covert and overt between a structured and measures of central
observation? unstructured observation? tendency?
Q. What is the difference Q. What is meant by Q. What are the 3 D’s that
between quantitative and “results were significant to are used to determine what
qualitative data? p<0.01” stats test to use?
(+) numerical so it can be analysed (+) shows the strength and
It predicts that the study will with statistics and easily compared direction of relationship between
not find any with other quantitative data to variables.
difference/relationship or that detect patterns. (-) it cannot show a cause and effect
any found was found due to (-) it isn’t detailed and cannot relationship between the variables
explain why the data collected is as they could be linked by a
chance.
the way it is. separate intervening variable.
It is the level or point at which it (+) it is detailed and A correlation is a research
is accepted that results are descriptive so gives an in- method used to investigate if
significant as there is a low
depth picture of behaviour. there is a relationship
enough probability the results
(-) it is difficult to analyse, between 2 variables. It can
were obtained by chance. In
Psychology this is usually lower compare, test for significance show positive, negative or no
than 5%. or detect patterns and trends. correlation between them.
Directional – you state which This is data collected that is
group/condition will score put in categories or groups. It
higher/lower.
is counting the frequency of a
Non-directional – you state that
a difference/relationship will be
set of scores (e.g how many
found but not exactly what way participants are tall medium
it will do. and short).
This is data that is rank
Observed Value – the ordered or A statistical measure of the
calculated value in a statistical non-scientific/subjective in strength and direction of
test. nature. relationship between 2 variables.
Critical Value – The value that It goes from -1 (perfect negative
is obtained from the stats E.g participant 1 was 5th correlation) to +1 (perfect
table. Or positive correlation).
Rating or ranking scales
This is precise scientific data
where there are equal distances
between data points on a scale. Nominal
P<0.05 Ordinal
E.g distance (cms), time Interval
(seconds) etc
This is whereby results of a study When the study is examining 1. Alternative Hypothesis
done a long time ago can be something that there is little
(experimental or
generalised to modern day previous research on, as the
behaviour. It is a form of researcher is unsure which way correlational)
external validity. the results will go. 2. Null Hypothesis
Q: What is a content Q: What is a thematic
Q: What is a case study?
analysis? analysis?
Q: How could you improve Q: How could you improve Q: How could you improve
reliability of a the reliability of an the reliability of an
questionnaire? interview? observations?
This is whether a test, scale or A check that the measuring tool you
measure appears “on the face of it” are using is equal to an existing
to measure the thing it is supposed to validated measuring tool. Concurrent Validity
measure. Checked by comparing with a
Done by examining the measuring correlation a participant’s scores on Face Validity
tool closely to having the tool your measure with their scores on
examined by an expert. an existing measure.
Reliability of these can be Reliability can be improved These can be assessed with test
ensured by making appropriate through having the same – retest.
behavioural categories interviewer for each
Have more than one observer participant. Anything that is unreliable will
and do an inter-observer Using a structured interview need adapting (remove
reliability check. can also improve reliability. questions, make them clearer).
Q: Explain when a
Q: Explain what is meant by Q: Explain when a Mann
Spearman’s Rho &
a significant and non- Whitney test would be
Pearson’s R test would be
significant result. used.
used.
Q: What is meant by a
Q: What is the difference
Q: What is meant by paradigm & does
between objectivity and
replicability in Psychology? Psychology have a
subjectivity?
paradigm?
Q: What is a discussion
Q: How is objectivity Q: What is meant by the for in the write up of a
increased in Psychology? Empirical Method? psychological
investigation?
1. Decide which statistics test is
Unrelated T Test – independent Relationship with nominal
appropriate
2. Calculate your observed/calculated measures experiment with data
value using the statistics test on your data interval/ratio data
3. Compare the calculated value to a table OR
of critical values.
Related T Test – repeated Difference, independent
4. Accept or reject the null &
experimental hypothesis measures measures & Nominal Data
Book:
Repeated Measures or Repeated Measures Author (date). Title. Location:
Publisher
Matched Pairs experiment Experiment (difference
examining a difference with study) Journal:
nominal data Ordinal level data Author (date). Title of article.
Journal name, Vol, Page
Objectivity is about ensuring no It’s one of the criteria of a science: Replication is about repeating a
where a subject’s workers subscribe study but changing small
bias in measurements.
to a common global theory or
circumstances to ensure
perspective, and subject matter.
Subjectivity is where there is bias generalisability of findings. It
Possibly, no single paradigm in
or where something is Psychology because of the differing ensures reliability and validity of
influenced by opinion. approaches. a study.
Results reported verbally and This means “experience” and so Controlled methods used
discussed in relation to people must have direct empirical Double blind collection of data
introduction research presented. evidence to support something. Operationalised variables
Strengths and weaknesses and Standardised procedures and
changes for next time are Examples of empirical methods instructions.
suggested. Implications for include: Experimentation and Peer review
findings also discussed. Observation