You are on page 1of 14

Q.

Give an advantage and


Q. What are the 5 sampling Q. What is the difference
disadvantage of Stratified
methods? between an IV and DV?
sampling.

Q. What are the 6 ethical Q: Explain what is meant by Q. Explain what is meant by
issues? a Quasi Experiment. confounding variable

Q. Give an advantage and


Q. Explain what is meant by Q. Explain what the mean,
disadvantage of Volunteer
Validity. mode and median are.
sampling.

Q. Give one advantage and


Q. Explain what is meant by Q. What are the different
one disadvantage of using
Reliability. types of Observation?
the Mean.

Q. Give an advantage and Q. Give one advantage and


Q. Explain what is meant by
disadvantage of one disadvantage of using
a Laboratory Experiment.
opportunity sampling. the Mode.

Q. Give an advantage and Q. Give one advantage and


Q. Explain what is meant by
disadvantage of Random one disadvantage of using
a Field Experiment.
sampling. the Median.

Q. Give an advantage and


Q. Explain what is meant by Q. What is meant by the
disadvantage of Systematic
a Natural Experiment. term Operationalised?
sampling.
IV (Independent Variable) is the
(+) It is usually representative of Stratified
variable that is manipulated and is
the target population as p’s are in
the potential cause that is being Systematic
proportion to their occurrence
investigated whereas the DV Random
and selected randomly.
(Dependent Variable) is the Opportunity
measured variable and is the Volunteer (Self-Selected)
(-) It is very time consuming
effect of changing the IV.
This is an experiment done in any Lack of Privacy
There are a variable other than the setting where the participants
IV that affects the DV or participants Lack of Confidentiality
are unable to be randomly
behaviour. They systematically vary Deception
allocated because they are
with the IV so affect one condition Lack of Right to Withdraw
and not the other. Can be automatically assigned to a
condition based on a Lack of Informed Consent
situational or participant variables.
characteristic of them. Failure to Protect From Harm

Mean – is the average calculated by (+) Relatively easy as the only Validity is concerned with
adding all data points up and dividing preparation needed is to place accuracy. It includes whether
by the number that there are. adverts and then participants
the study has measured what it
Mode – most frequent score in a data contact them to take part.
set. (-) likely to be biased and not apply
intended to measure (internal)
Median – is the middle value in a ranked to target pop as only helpful people and whether results can be
(from lowest to highest) data set. will apply. generalised (external).

(+) It is representative of all data Reliability is concerned with


scores as they are all included in the Naturalistic and Controlled, consistency. It includes whether
calculation.
Structured and Unstructured, everything has been done
(-) it is possible that it can be
skewed by an anomaly (very
Covert and Overt, consistently in the study and
high/low score) and so may not be a Participant and Non-Participant whether the study results are
true reflection of the data. consistent over time.

(+) It isn’t affected by extreme (+) It is quick and easy and requires
A research method conducted in no prior preparation because it uses
values.
a controlled setting whereby the those available at time of testing.
(-) It is unrepresentative of all
research manipulates the IV and (-) It is likely to be biased as certain
data points as it focuses on only types of people will be unavailable
measures the DV. EV’s are
the most frequent value and and so may not apply to target
controlled.
ignores the others. population.

(+) Usually representative and


(+) It isn’t affected by extreme A research method conducted in unbiased as every member of the
values. a natural setting whereby the target population has an equal
(-) It is unrepresentative of all research manipulates the IV and chance of being selected.
data points as it focuses on only measures the DV. There is some (-) can be difficult and time
the middle value in the data set. control of EV’s. consuming to collect the list of all
member of target pop first.
(+) Can be fairly unbiased as the
It is turning variables into A research method whereby a researcher decides on system before
measurable Forms (e.g using an researcher makes use of a seeing ps – so can’t select particular
IQ test to measure intelligence). naturally occurring IV (one that is people.
Being very specific about how to already happening and is not (-) if participants selected by system
manipulate and measure the manipulated by the researcher). don’t want to take part then the
variables. There is little control of EV’s. system fails and it may make the
sample unrepresentative.
Q. Explain what the
Q. Explain what is meant by Q. Explain what each of the
different types of interview
inter-rater reliability. 3 experimental designs are.
there are.

Q. Give any advantages and


Q. Give any advantages and Q. Explain what the
any disadvantages of
any disadvantages of difference is between open
independent
repeated measures design. and closed questions?
measures/groups design.

Q. Give any advantages and Q. How could you


Q. Give 3 examples of
any disadvantages of minimise/deal with
situational variables.
matched pairs design. participant variables?

Q. In an observation you
Q. What are the two can do two different types
Q. What is mundane
different types of order of sampling to decide what
realism?
effects? behaviour to observe. What
are they?

Q. What measures of
central tendency and
Q. What is the range? Q. What is a confederate?
dispersion are used with
each level of measurement?

Q. What is social desirability Q. What are demand Q. What is meant by an


bias? characteristics? observation?

Q. How could you minimise


Q. Explain how order Q. Explain what
both investigator
effects can be minimised in standardised
effects/bias and demand
a repeated measures procedures/standardisation
characteristics at the same
design? means.
time?
Structured – The questions are pre-set Repeated Measures - same p’s do all This is a check for internal reliability
and all p’s asked the same. conditions of IV. of researchers. It gets two or more
Independent Measures/groups – researchers (e.g observers) to score
Unstructured – Questions not pre-set, participants using the same coding
Different groups of p’s do each
they are developed from p’s previous
condition of IV. sheets and then their answers are
answers.
Matched Pairs – P’s are paired on correlated to ensure they have the
Semi-Structured – Some pre-set
certain variables and then one from same data – i.e correlation of 0.8 is
questions & can develop some as well.
each pair does one condition. needed.
(+) There are no participant (+) less demand characteristics
Open – participants are free to variables because participants sit as they only see one condition.
answer anything. all conditions of IV. (+) No Order effects
(-) There can be order effects (-) There could be individual
Closed – Participants are to (-) it can increase demand differences (participant
select from limited answers. characteristics as more likely to variables) that account for
guess what the aim is. the difference in scores.
(+) There are less participant variables
 Repeated Measures Time of Day because participants are paired.
(completely gets rid of them) Weather (+) less demand characteristics as they
only see one condition.
 Matched Pairs (Minimises Temperature (-) there could be other individual
some) Noise differences not accounted for in the
 Random allocation Distractions paring.
(-) Time consuming to match up.
Time Sampling – recording the Practise – whereby people get
behaviour of participants at time better in the second condition as How true to life the study is,
intervals (e.g every 20 secs) they have done it once already.
particularly how reflective
Fatigue - whereby people get
Event Sampling – counting the bored doing 2 conditions so of real life the task given to
number of instances a behaviour don’t try as hard the second participants.
is shown. time.
It is a measure of dispersion Nominal – Mode & Range
An actor employed by the and looks at the difference
experimenter to act a between the highest data Ordinal – Median & Range
participant during the point and the lowest data
experiment. point. It is mainly used with Interval – Mean and Standard
ordinal data. Deviation

Demand characteristics are


Social desirability bias is where
It is where a researcher simply whereby a participant
participants give a “desirable”
watches without interfering and changes their behaviour in
there is no manipulation of an IV.
answer to make themselves
order to help a researcher or
appear good.
deliberately spoil a study.

Counterbalancing
All participants receive the Double Blind
Some sit condition A first and
same instructions, researcher,
some sit condition B first.
methods etc. Used to avoid Keeps aims hidden from
It balances order effects out,
issues with internal reliability researcher collecting data and
so effect both conditions
or extraneous variables. participants.
equally.
Q. Give one advantage and Q. Give one advantage and
Q. What is the null
one disadvantage of using a one disadvantage of
hypothesis?
correlation. quantitative data.

Q. Give one advantage and


Q. Explain what a Q. What is a significance
one disadvantage of
correlation is. level?
qualitative data.

Q. What are the two


Q. Explain the difference in
Q. Explain what is meant by different ways a hypothesis
the graphs of positive and
nominal level data? can be written and what is
negative skew.
the difference?

Q. What is a correlation Q. Explain what is meant by


Q. What is an OV and CV?
coefficient? Ordinal level data?

Q. What is the significance


Q. What are the 3 levels of Q. Explain what is meant by
level accepted in
measurement/data? Interval level data?
Psychology?

Q. What is the difference Q. What is the difference Q. What are the different
between a covert and overt between a structured and measures of central
observation? unstructured observation? tendency?

Q. What is the difference Q. What is meant by Q. What are the 3 D’s that
between quantitative and “results were significant to are used to determine what
qualitative data? p<0.01” stats test to use?
(+) numerical so it can be analysed (+) shows the strength and
It predicts that the study will with statistics and easily compared direction of relationship between
not find any with other quantitative data to variables.
difference/relationship or that detect patterns. (-) it cannot show a cause and effect
any found was found due to (-) it isn’t detailed and cannot relationship between the variables
explain why the data collected is as they could be linked by a
chance.
the way it is. separate intervening variable.
It is the level or point at which it (+) it is detailed and A correlation is a research
is accepted that results are descriptive so gives an in- method used to investigate if
significant as there is a low
depth picture of behaviour. there is a relationship
enough probability the results
(-) it is difficult to analyse, between 2 variables. It can
were obtained by chance. In
Psychology this is usually lower compare, test for significance show positive, negative or no
than 5%. or detect patterns and trends. correlation between them.
Directional – you state which This is data collected that is
group/condition will score put in categories or groups. It
higher/lower.
is counting the frequency of a
Non-directional – you state that
a difference/relationship will be
set of scores (e.g how many
found but not exactly what way participants are tall medium
it will do. and short).
This is data that is rank
Observed Value – the ordered or A statistical measure of the
calculated value in a statistical non-scientific/subjective in strength and direction of
test. nature. relationship between 2 variables.
Critical Value – The value that It goes from -1 (perfect negative
is obtained from the stats E.g participant 1 was 5th correlation) to +1 (perfect
table. Or positive correlation).
Rating or ranking scales
This is precise scientific data
where there are equal distances
between data points on a scale. Nominal
P<0.05 Ordinal
E.g distance (cms), time Interval
(seconds) etc

A structured observation is where Covert – means participants


Mean
there is a coding sheet and a don’t know they are being
system to record observations. studied as the researcher is
Mode
hidden.
Unstructured means all behaviour Overt - means they can see they
Median
is recorded without a system. are being researched.

It means that the results


Data – what level of data is the Quantitative – numerical data
probability of being due to
DV?
chance is less than 1% which is that expressed the quantity of
Design – What experimental
lower than the standard a measure.
design is the study?
accepted 5% significance level. Qualitative – detailed and
Difference – is the study looking
Chance of a type 1 error is descriptive data.
for a difference or relationship?
reduced.
Q. Explain what ecological Q. Describe ways of dealing
Q: What is a pilot study?
validity is. with informed consent.

Q. Explain how protection


Q. Explain what population Q. Name ways of dealing
from harm can be dealt
validity is. with confidentiality?
with.

Q. Explain 2 advantages and


Q. Explain what is mean by Q. Describe ways of dealing
2 disadvantages of a
“privacy”. with deception.
laboratory experiment.

Q. Explain 2 advantages and Q. Explain what is meant by Q: What is an advantage


2 disadvantages of a field a “lack of informed and a disadvantage of a
experiment. consent”? Quasi Experiment?

Q. Explain 2 advantages and


Q. What is needed if you are Q. What could be done to
2 disadvantages of a natural
drawing a conclusion? minimise EV’s?
experiment.

Q. What is the difference


Q. Explain 2 advantages and
between a participant and Q. When might a pilot study
2 disadvantages of using a
non-participant be used?
questionnaire.
observation?

Q. What is the name of the


Q. What are the different
group of people that the Q: When would a sign test
types of extraneous and
study is trying to generalise be carried out?
confounding variables?
to?
Ecological Validity – whether
It is a small scale trial study to
1. Get p’s to sign consent the study setting reflects
test the procedures etc of a
form before study. normal real life and so
study with the view to make
2. Get retrospective consent whether results can be
improvements before the real
3. Get presumptive consent generalised to a real life
study.
setting.
Population Validity – Whether
Don’t record identifiable Do a pilot study to identify
the sample used is
risks
data (e.g names). representative of the target
Do a debrief after the study if
Create a participant coding population and so whether
any harm was caused during
system. results can be generalised to
the study.
that target population.
Privacy is about making sure not (+) High control of EVs = means a
to observe people, unless in cause an effect relationship can be
Don’t deceive unless
public places or with their established
necessary. consent, and to respect the fact (+) Easy to replicate to ensure
they may want to keep some reliability.
Do a debrief after the study. information about themselves (-) Low ecological validity
private. (-) Demand characteristics likely

(+) Less experimenter bias in (+) High ecological validity


allocation of p’s because they This means that the (+) Demand characteristics less
are automatically assigned. researcher didn’t obtain likely
appropriate consent from (-) Low control of EV’s – difficult
(-) might be participant variable participants or their parents (if to get a cause and effect
EV’s as participants cannot be under 16) to take part. relationship.
randomly assigned. (-) More difficult to replicate
Conclusion: i.e what do findings (+) High ecological validity
Pilot study – to identify them prior (+) Demand characteristics less
suggest
to the main study
likely
Standardise Procedures – so no
Justification: This is because the (-) No real control of EV’s –
situational variables
mean was higher in condition 1 than difficult to get a cause and effect
Matched pairs/repeated measures –
2 (state how much higher in relationship.
to avoid participant variables.
numbers) (-) More difficult to replicate
1. To identify EV’s A participant observation is one (+) More likely to get honest answers
where the researcher is acting like a than an interview
2. To see what ethical issues might participant and observes secretly. (+) Quick and easy to replicate for
arise e.g what risks might need large samples.
minimising A non-participant observation is (-) Could have social desirability bias.
where the researcher is observing (-) questions could be misinterpreted
3. To check the procedures work and not taking part. by p’s.

 In experiment/difference Participant Variables (differences


studies in people – only in independent
measures)
 With Repeated Measures Target Population
Design (related data) Situational Variables – anything
 With Nominal Data in testing environment.
Q: What is the difference Q: Explain two differences
between primary and Q: What is a Meta-Analysis? between correlations and
secondary data? experiments?

Q: What do the following Q: Explain what the


symbols mean? following signs mean: Q: What is meant by
∝ ≥ > >> standard deviation?
~ << < ≤

Q: What type of graph


Q: What is an advantage Q: What is meant by
would be usually used with
and a disadvantage of using random allocation and
an experiment and for a
the standard deviation? what is its purpose?
correlation?

Q: How is a sign test Q: How to calculate a Q: What is meant by Peer


conducted? percentage? Review?

Q: What are behavioural


Q: What is meant by normal
Q: What is a case study? categories (or coding
distribution?
systems) in observations?

Q: In ethical issues, what is Q: What techniques can be


Q: What is a double blind
meant by a cost-benefit done to create a random
method?
analysis? sample?

Q: When would a non-


Q: What two hypotheses
directional hypothesis be Q: What is meant by
are needed for every
preferred to a directional temporal validity?
investigation?
hypothesis?
1. Experiments examine differences Primary data – Data which is
between conditions of an IV
whereas Correlations examine It is a large scale review study collected for the purpose of the
current study.
relationships between covariables. whereby a researcher analyses
Secondary Data – Data which
2. Experiments aim to get a cause and lots of studies data on a topic
effect relationship whereas was collected for another
to find an overall conclusion. purpose/different study and then
correlations cannot establish cause
and effect. used in the study.
≥ - more than or equal to
This is a measure of
> - more than
dispersion. It assesses ∝ - In proportion to
>> - a lot more than
the average distance
<< - a lot less than ~ - Approximately equal to
each data point is from
< - less than
the mean.
≤ - less than or equal to

It is assigning participants at (+) Takes into consideration


random to each condition of an Experiment: Bar Chart every score in the data set
IV.
It is done to reduce participant Correlation: Scattergraph (-) Could be affected by
variables (EV’s). outliers reducing its use

It is the assessment of a 1. State the signs – if p’s scored the


researchers work by other Part of a whole (small same, more or less in second
experts in the same field of study condition
number) divided by the 2. Take lowest number of signs
(i.e their peers!). Their task is to
report on the quality of the whole (big number) and 3. Compare to critical value table
research before publication in a then times by 100. (reduce n if p’s scored same.

journal. 4. State significance of result

Behavioural Categories are using


It is where
It is a longitudinal, in depth the data
coding systems to break investigation of a person or
behaviours up I.e forms a
operationalisating it. E.g
small group involving “bell
aggression can be categorised interviewing, observing and curve”.
into verbal, kick, hit etc testing them.

The lottery method – draw It is whereby an ethics board will


It is where the participants and names out a hat weigh up what the scientific
experimenter collecting data are Random Number Generators – benefits/gains of a piece of
unaware of the aims of the using a computer to randomly research will be versus what
investigation. generate numbers assigned to ethical costs there will be to
each participant. participants.

This is whereby results of a study When the study is examining 1. Alternative Hypothesis
done a long time ago can be something that there is little
(experimental or
generalised to modern day previous research on, as the
behaviour. It is a form of researcher is unsure which way correlational)
external validity. the results will go. 2. Null Hypothesis
Q: What is a content Q: What is a thematic
Q: What is a case study?
analysis? analysis?

Q: What are the strengths Q: What are the strengths


Q: What things lower
and limitations of a case and limitations of a content
internal validity?
study? analysis?

Q: How could you improve Q: How could you improve


Q: How could you improve
the validity of a the validity of
the validity in experiments?
questionnaire? observations?

Q: What ways can you Q: What is meant by Q: What is meant by


assess/check the validity? concurrent validity? Face Validity?

Q: What aspects of a study


Q: How is a test-retest Q: What is a test-retest used
could have an issue of
carried out? for?
reliability?

Q: How could you improve Q: How could you improve Q: How could you improve
reliability of a the reliability of an the reliability of an
questionnaire? interview? observations?

Q: How could you improve


Q: What stats tests do you Q: What is the difference in
the reliability of an
need to know? a type 1 and type 2 error?
experiment?
An in-depth (usually longitudinal)
This is analysing data to identify A form of observation but instead
study that gathers a lot of detail
themes (patterns) in the data. of people, their communications
about one person or a small group.
It is examining the data to see if (newspapers, tv ads, magazines)
It involves a variety of techniques
something keeps cropping up. are studied instead.
(e.g observaitons/interviews) and a
It is more descriptive than coding in The things are studied for patterns
info comes from a range of sources
quantitative content analysis. and trends within them.
(the individual & family, friends).
- difficulty in generalising
+ no social desirability or demand - subjective & may have bias
 EV’s and CV’s characteristics - difficulty in replicating
 Investigator Bias + high ecological validity
 Demand Characteristics - time consuming to carry out +in depth data gathered
-potential issues with observer + Complex interaction of factors can be
 Social Desirability Bias
studied at once
bias + good for rare cases

 Use a covert design o p’s less  Including a lie scale


 Use a control group to
aware of the study
ensure results are due to  Making them anonymous
 Use behavioural categories
manipulation
to reduce opportunities for
observer bias
 Use double blind to reduce Both increase the accuracy
experimenter bias of answers
 Double blind design

This is whether a test, scale or A check that the measuring tool you
measure appears “on the face of it” are using is equal to an existing
to measure the thing it is supposed to validated measuring tool. Concurrent Validity
measure. Checked by comparing with a
Done by examining the measuring correlation a participant’s scores on Face Validity
tool closely to having the tool your measure with their scores on
examined by an expert. an existing measure.

A test-retest assesses whether a It is done by administering the same


measuring tool is reliably test to the same/similar people on The Procedure
measuring the same thing each different occasions. The scores on
time it is completed by a the two tests are correlated to
The Researcher
participant. Usually used with ensure a positive 0.8 correlation or The Measuring Tool
questionnaires. higher.

 Reliability of these can be  Reliability can be improved  These can be assessed with test
ensured by making appropriate through having the same – retest.
behavioural categories interviewer for each
 Have more than one observer participant.  Anything that is unreliable will
and do an inter-observer  Using a structured interview need adapting (remove
reliability check. can also improve reliability. questions, make them clearer).

Type 1 – false positive – when the • Sign Test


experimental hypothesis may have  Lab based ones have good
• Chi Squared
been wrongfully accepted when null control over the procedures to
• T-Test (unrelated and related)
should have been. ensure reliability (e.g same
• Mann Whitney
Type 2 – false negative – when the null testing room/researcher etc).
• Spearman’s Rho
hypothesis was potentially wrongfully
• Pearson’s R  This is more difficult in real life
accepted when the experimental may studies.
have been true. • Wilcoxon
Q: Explain step by step
Q: Explain when a Chi what you do to find out if
Q: Explain when the two t-
Squared test would be your results are significant
tests would be used.
used. after you have collected the
data.

Q: Explain when a
Q: Explain what is meant by Q: Explain when a Mann
Spearman’s Rho &
a significant and non- Whitney test would be
Pearson’s R test would be
significant result. used.
used.

Q: How do you write a Q: Explain when a Wilcoxon Q: Explain when a Sign


reference? test would be used. Test would be used.

Q: What features are


Q: What is an abstract in a Q: What things would
included in a scientific write
psychological write up? constitute a science?
up of a piece of research?

Q: What is an inductive way Q: What is a deductive way Q: What is meant by


of researching? of researching? falsifiability?

Q: What is meant by a
Q: What is the difference
Q: What is meant by paradigm & does
between objectivity and
replicability in Psychology? Psychology have a
subjectivity?
paradigm?

Q: What is a discussion
Q: How is objectivity Q: What is meant by the for in the write up of a
increased in Psychology? Empirical Method? psychological
investigation?
1. Decide which statistics test is
Unrelated T Test – independent Relationship with nominal
appropriate
2. Calculate your observed/calculated measures experiment with data
value using the statistics test on your data interval/ratio data
3. Compare the calculated value to a table OR
of critical values.
Related T Test – repeated Difference, independent
4. Accept or reject the null &
experimental hypothesis measures measures & Nominal Data

Significant means there was less


than a 5% chance results occurred Spearman’s - Relationship
Independent Measures due to chance so experimental with ordinal data
Experiment with Ordinal hypothesis accepted.
Data Non-significant means a greater Pearson’s R – Relationship
than 5% chance so null hypothesis is
with interval data
accepted.

Book:
Repeated Measures or Repeated Measures Author (date). Title. Location:
Publisher
Matched Pairs experiment Experiment (difference
examining a difference with study) Journal:
nominal data Ordinal level data Author (date). Title of article.
Journal name, Vol, Page

• Constructing Theories & Title


Testing Hypotheses Abstract Short summary of the study
Introduction
• Falsifiability (150-200 words). It includes
Method
• Replicability Results aims, hypotheses, findings
• Objectivity Discussion and results.
• Having a Paradigm References

It is about whether a theory can


be tested and disproven if the Propose a Theory Generate Hypotheses
theory turns out to be correct. Generate Hypotheses Test Hypotheses
No amount of evidence ever Test Hypotheses Draw Conclusions
proves a theory so science works Draw Conclusions Propose A Theory
on disproving the incorrect ones.

Objectivity is about ensuring no It’s one of the criteria of a science: Replication is about repeating a
where a subject’s workers subscribe study but changing small
bias in measurements.
to a common global theory or
circumstances to ensure
perspective, and subject matter.
Subjectivity is where there is bias generalisability of findings. It
Possibly, no single paradigm in
or where something is Psychology because of the differing ensures reliability and validity of
influenced by opinion. approaches. a study.

Results reported verbally and This means “experience” and so  Controlled methods used
discussed in relation to people must have direct empirical  Double blind collection of data
introduction research presented. evidence to support something.  Operationalised variables
Strengths and weaknesses and  Standardised procedures and
changes for next time are Examples of empirical methods instructions.
suggested. Implications for include: Experimentation and  Peer review
findings also discussed. Observation

You might also like