Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HL IOA Rubric 2020 Color Avenir
HL IOA Rubric 2020 Color Avenir
Criterion A Language: How successfully does the candidate command spoken language?
• To what extent…
…is the vocabulary appropriate and varied?
…are the grammatical structures varied?
…does the accuracy of the language contribute to effective communication?
…do pronunciation and intonation affect communication?
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
Criterion B1: Message-literary extract: How Criterion B2: Message-conversation: How Criterion C: Interactive skills-
relevant are the ideas to the literary relevant are the ideas in the conversation? communication: To what extent does the
extract? candidate understand and interact?
• How appropriately and thoroughly does the
• How well does the the candidate engage candidate respond to the questions in the • How well can the candidate express ideas
with the literary extract in the presentation? conversation? and maintain a conversation?
• To what depth are the questions answered?
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
The presentation is mostly irrelevant to the The candidate consistently struggles to address the Comprehension and interaction are limited.
literary extract. questions.
• The candidate provides listed responses in the target
1-2 • The candidate makes superficial use of the • Some responses are appropriate and are rarely justified. language.
extract. Observations and opinions are • Participation is limited. Most questions must be
• Responses are limited in scope and depth.
generalized, simplistic, and mostly repeated and/or rephrased.
unsupported.
The presentation is mostly relevant to the The candidate’s responses are mostly relevant to the Comprehension and interaction are mostly sustained.
literary extract. questions.
• The candidate provides responses in the target
3-4 • The candidate makes competent use of the • Most responses are appropriate and some are
language and mostly demonstrates comprehension.
literary extract. Some observations and developed.
opinions are developed and supported with • Participation is mostly sustained.
• Responses are mostly broad in scope and depth.
reference to the extract.
The presentation is consistently relevant to The candidate’s responses are consistently relevant to Comprehension and interaction are consistently
the literary extract and is convincing. the questions and show some development. sustained.
• The candidate makes effective use of the • Responses are consistently appropriate and developed.
5-6 • The candidate provides responses in the target
extract. Observations and opinions are • Responses are broad in scope and depth, including language and demonstrates comprehension.
effectively developed and supported with personal interpretations and/or attempts to engage the
reference to the extract. interlocutor. • Participation is sustained with some independent
contributions.