Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Article
548 Molecular Cell 40, 548–557, November 24, 2010 ª2010 Elsevier Inc.
Molecular Cell
Ubiquitin Binding to A20 ZnF4
decreased modulation of NF-kB signaling. In contrast, we Table 1. Data Collection and Refinement Statistics
demonstrate that both depolymerization of poly-Ub chains and
A20 ZnF4-Ub A20 ZnF4-Ub-UbcH5A
interactions with substrate and E2 are not dependent on A20
Data Collection
ZnF4.
Space group P21 P321
RESULTS Cell Dimensions
a, b, c (Å) 42.9, 170.2, 66.2 102.6, 102.6, 112.7
A20 ZnF4 Has Three Ub-Binding Sites a, b, g ( ) 90, 90.1, 90 90, 90, 120
Because of generally low affinities between Ub and its binding Resolution (Å) 50–2.5 25–3.4
partners, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was Rsym 8.0 (40.9) 11.5 (75.0)
used to assess the association between recombinant A20
I/sI 15.3 (3.5) 16.8 (3.3)
ZnF3-4 and Ub and to demonstrate the formation of a stable
Completeness (%) 96.2 (98.2) 98.2 (99.8)
A20 ZnF-Ub complex in solution (Figures S1A–S1D, available on-
Redundancy 3.9 (3.9) 6.1 (6.0)
line). Backbone assignments of A20 ZnF3-4 enabled us to map
the Ub interaction area to ZnF4, because only resonances Refinement
belonging to ZnF4 were perturbed upon addition of Ub (Figures Resolution (Å) 43–2.5 25–3.4
S1C and S2). Complementary studies using labeled Ub confirmed Number of reflections 31,511 9,612
the existence of this interaction and revealed that A20 ZnF4 Rwork/Rfree 20.4 / 22.6 28.0 / 31.9
contacts Ub in the vicinity of residue D58 (Figures S1A and S1B). Number of Atoms
To better understand the association of A20 ZnF4 with Ub, we
Protein 6,602 3,984
determined the crystal structure of the A20 ZnF4-Ub complex to
Ligand/ion 8 2
a resolution of 2.5 Å (Table 1, Figure 1, and Figures S1E–S1K).
Despite participating in very different biological processes, the Water 127
core A20 ZnF4 structure resembles that of the ZnF from the B-factors
Rabex-5, a regulator of endosomal trafficking (Lee et al., 2006; Protein 55.5 86.5
Penengo et al., 2006) (Figures S1E and S1F). The crystal structure Ligand/ion 54.3 73.6
of A20 ZnF4 is consistent with the unpublished NMR structure Water 41.6
(Protein Data Bank [PDB] ID code 2EQE), with a root-mean- Rms deviations
square deviation (rmsd) of 0.8 Å across 99 main chain atoms,
Bond lengths (Å) 0.009 0.009
although careful comparison shows that both backbone and
Bond angles ( ) 1.054 1.013
side chain conformations differ in detail. Despite the one-to-one
X-ray diffraction data were collected on one crystal for each structure.
stoichiometry between A20 ZnF4 and Ub in the crystallographic
Values in parentheses are for the highest-resolution shell.
asymmetric unit, the crystal packing unexpectedly revealed
that A20 ZnF4 interacts with three separate Ub molecules (Ub1,
Ub2, and Ub3), each via a unique interface (Figures 1A and 1B). 94
The first Ub-binding site (site I) involves a cryptic inverted Ub- TEK96 sequence in the cell-cycle regulatory protein Securin
interacting motif (cIUIM) formed by the C-terminal a-helix of A20 (Jin et al., 2008). This motif has been implicated in the formation
ZnF4, which contacts the I44 hydrophobic patch of Ub1 of K11-linked poly-Ub chains leading to degradation of modified
centered at residues L8, I44, and V70 (Figures 1C and Fig- proteins (Jin et al., 2008). The A20 ZnF4-TEK box interface is
ure S1G). The binding mode of this interaction shows significant relatively small, burying 500 Å2 of solvent accessible surface
differences from what has previously been observed for UIM and area. Of this area, 270 Å2 is contributed by seven Ub residues,
IUIM motifs (Figures S1H–S1K). In particular, the position of the and 230 Å2 is contributed by 12 A20 ZnF4 residues. NMR spec-
invariant alanine in the consensus sequence defining the UIM- troscopy confirms that all three interfaces are formed in solution,
IUIM motif is occupied by the bulkier L626 from the a-helix of with the tightest binding observed at site II, with Kd of approxi-
A20 ZnF4. As a consequence, the A20 ZnF4 a-helix is tilted mately 40 mM (Figure 2A and Figure S1D). The binding of
30 compared to a typical a-helix orientation in UIM-IUIM-Ub mono-Ub to the A20 ZnF4 cIUIM (site I) is relatively weak and
interactions. was detected only when concentrations of Ub exceeded
The second A20 ZnF4-Ub contact (site II) is mediated by the 500 mM. Interactions with site III were observed at intermediate
50 s loop of Ub2 (residues E51–K63) and the N-terminal portion concentrations of Ub. The weak association measured between
of the A20 ZnF4 preceding the a-helix (Figure 1D). Comparison of A20 ZnF4 and mono-Ub is consistent with the affinities of other
the A20 ZnF4-Ub2 and Rabex-5 ZnF-Ub structures (Lee et al., Ub-binding domains (UBDs) for mono-Ub, which vary signifi-
2006; Penengo et al., 2006) reveals that this interaction is cantly with Kd values in the range of 1 to1,000 mM (Harper and
observed in both complexes (Figures S1E and S1F), while sites Schulman, 2006; Hicke et al., 2005; Hurley et al., 2006).
I and III are not present in the Rabex-5 ZnF-Ub complex.
The third A20 ZnF4-Ub interaction engages a Ub-binding A20 ZnF4 Selectively Recognizes K63-Linked
surface, which encompasses the TEK-box motif on Ub3 Poly-Ub Chains
(site III, Figures 1E and 1F). The TEK-box motif consists of a short Intriguingly, the A20 ZnF4-Ub complex suggests that A20 ZnF4
region of similarity around the 9TGK11 sequence in Ub and the selectively interacts with K63-linked poly-Ub, because the K63
Molecular Cell 40, 548–557, November 24, 2010 ª2010 Elsevier Inc. 549
Molecular Cell
Ubiquitin Binding to A20 ZnF4
residues of Ub1 and Ub2 are near the C-termini of Ub2 and Ub3, K11-, and K48-linked tri-Ub with A20 ZnF4, indicating lower-
respectively (Figures 1A and 1B). We tested this hypothesis by affinity interactions. Although the conformation of linear and
examining the interaction of A20 ZnF4 with mono-Ub, as well K63-linked poly-Ub is similar, our NMR and chromatography
as various forms of tri-Ub chains, in solution using size exclusion data reveal that A20 ZnF4 distinguishes between the two link-
chromatography and NMR spectroscopy (Figure 2 and Fig- ages and selectively binds to K63-linked tri-Ub with higher
ure S2). Addition of a very high concentration of mono-Ub affinity.
(2 mM) to A20 ZnF4 resulted in perturbations of resonances
from all three sites, which is consistent with the observation of Mutations in the A20 ZnF4 Ub-Binding Sites Impair
three binding sites in the crystal structure. Addition of K63-linked A20 Function
tri-Ub to A20 ZnF4 at concentrations far lower than those tested In order to determine the importance of the enhanced affinity for
with mono-Ub led to resonance perturbations at all three sites, K63-linked poly-Ub, we mutated residues in the Ub-binding
indicating that K63-linked tri-Ub interacts with all three sites (Fig- sites. In vitro ubiquitination analysis using either wild-type A20
ure 2D). The increase in affinity is K63-linkage-specific, because or A20 ZnF4 point mutants targeting each of the three Ub-
NMR spectroscopy analysis using K48-linked, K11-linked, and binding sites (site I: I629A, I629R; sites I and II: L626A, L626R;
linear tri-Ub showed no increase in affinity (Figures S2B–S2E), site II: Y614A, F615A; site III: S605R, R608E, K606E, G622R)
implying that only one Ub from these tri-Ubs can bind at showed that this surface is necessary for A20-mediated ubiqui-
a time. K63-linked tri-Ub association is A20 ZnF4 specific, tination. Full-length A20 carrying a single point mutation Y614A,
because resonances belonging to A20 ZnF3 remained F615A, or L626R, or the double mutations Y614A, L626R or
unchanged upon addition of K63-linked tri-Ub to A20 ZnF3-4 Y614A, F615A failed to generate significant amounts of poly-
(Figure S2B). Size exclusion chromatography also showed an Ub chains when compared to wild-type A20 (Figure 3A). The
association between A20 ZnF4 and K63-linked tri-Ub, as the severity of the effect was comparable to mutating the cysteines
two proteins coeluted together (Figure 2C). In contrast, size coordinating the Zn2+ ion, which has been shown to markedly
exclusion chromatography showed no coelution of linear, attenuate A20 activity (Figure S3A; Wertz et al., 2004). Mutations
550 Molecular Cell 40, 548–557, November 24, 2010 ª2010 Elsevier Inc.
Molecular Cell
Ubiquitin Binding to A20 ZnF4
A Site I Site II B
I629
G622
E633 E633 N634
E633 E630
N634 Y631 T617 105
I629 I629
# # G616
N620 L626 R632 #
N620 L626 G599
T602
N (ppm)
Y614 T604 115
F615 T597
F615 S605 I629
N634
N620
R596 E633 E630
E619 Y631
F628 R601 D600
120
15
V613 #
L626 R632 # #
F623
Q593
C624 C627 A595
A594 C612 125
ZnF4 site Y614 K606
K606 C607
R608
F615
R608 60 µM - ++ + 130
G616 A610
150 µM - +++ ++
T617 K621 ZnF4 apo
500 µM ++ +++ +++
ZnF4 + mono-Ub
10 9 8 7 6
Site III 1
H (ppm)
C D
40 K63 apo I629
ZnF4 apo G622
N634
Absorptoin 280nM (mAU)
N (ppm)
T602
115
T597
0 F615 S605 I629 N620
N634
E633 E630
R596
E619 Y631
10 11 12 13 14 15 F628 R601 D600 120
15
V613 #
# #
Volume (ml) L626 R632
Q593 F623
C624 C627 A595
kDa MS ZnF4 + K63-linked tri-Ub MS ZnF4 + Linear tri-Ub A594
C612 125
Y614 K606
64 R608
K635
50 K609 C607
36
130
A610
22
ZnF4 apo
16
ZnF4 + K63 tri-Ub
6 10 9 8 7 6
4 1
H (ppm)
Molecular Cell 40, 548–557, November 24, 2010 ª2010 Elsevier Inc. 551
Molecular Cell
Ubiquitin Binding to A20 ZnF4
A C 0 0
wild type Y614A L626R F615A
Y614A Y614A A2 20 A2 20
L626R F615A M no A no A
148
250
250- 148
98
WB: biotin 148- 64 98
50 64
36 50
98- 36
160
80
40
0
Linkage type
B
120 120
cyclin D2 c-FLIP
100 100
Relative expression (%)
0 YA 0
A2 /- + A2
+Y R
A
AF
L
80 80
0 WT
A2 /- +
A2 /-
-/-
-
-
0
0
60 60
A2
40 40
WB: A20
20 20
0 WB: actin
0
-/-
-/-
0
R
A
A2
A2
AF
AL
AF
AL
0
0
A2
A2
T
T
+Y
+Y
+Y
+Y
+W
+W
-/-
-/-
-/-
-/-
-/-
-/-
0
0
A2
A2
A2
A2
0
0
A2
A2
D
A20-OTU A20-OTU A20-FL A20-FL
K48-linked K63-linked K11-linked Linear K48-linked K63-linked K11-linked Linear
kDa 0 0.5 1 2 5 21 0 0.5 1 2 5 21 kDa 0 0.5 1 2 5 21 0 0.5 1 2 5 21 hrs kDa 0 0.5 1 2 5 21 0 0.5 1 2 5 21 kDa 0 0.5 1 2 5 21 0 0.5 1 2 5 21 hrs
98 98 98 98
64 64 64 64
50 50 50 50
36 4Ub 36 36 4Ub
36
3Ub 3Ub
22 22 22 22
2Ub 2Ub
16 16 16
16
1Ub 1Ub
6 6
6 6
Figure 3. The Ub-Binding Site on A20 ZnF4 Is Required for Ub Chain Polymerization and for Modulation of NF-kB Signaling
(A) Mutations to the Ub-binding sites in A20 ZnF4 impair A20-dependent ubiquitination. Full-length A20 protein wild-type (WT), the single point mutants
Y614A or L626R or F615A, and the double mutants Y614A, L626R and Y614A, F615A were expressed in 293T cells and assayed with UbcH7 for the
ability to auto-ubiquitinate A20. Only A20 with an intact Ub-binding site II on A20 ZnF4 was able to promote effective auto-ubiquitination. Mutations
to this site result in reduced ubiquitination comparable to mutations of the Zn2+ ion coordinating cysteines (Figure S4A). The A20 double
mutant Y614A, F615A is as deficient in activity as control assays lacking A20, indicating the critical importance of Ub-binding site II on ZnF4 for A20
function.
(B) Complementation studies to monitor NF-kB response. A20 null MEFs were transfected with vector, wild-type, Y614A, L626R (YALR) or the double
mutant Y614A, F615A (YAFA) A20, and the relative expression of NF-kB responsive genes cyclin D2 and c-FLIP was monitored by real-time polymerase
chain reaction (PCR) after activation of cells with 100 ng/mL human TNF-a for 45 min. Cyclin D2 and c-FLIP mRNA levels were normalized against b-actin
expression. The mean of triplicate experiments is shown ± SD. Western blots quantitating A20 levels are shown at right. Similar amounts of wild-type or
mutant A20 are present, indicating that the mutations do not affect expression or stability of A20. Error bars in (B) and (C) are the standard deviation of
triplicate measurements.
(C) Recombinant A20 and UbcH5A catalyzed ubiquitination generates K11, K48, and K63 linkages. Coomassie blue-stained gel of Ub chains is generated
by in vitro ubiquitination reaction using A20 purified from 293T cells compared to a control reaction without A20. The red box marks the gel region that
was excised and subjected to in-gel trypsin digestion followed by Ub-absolute quantification (Blankenship et al., 2009; Kirkpatrick et al., 2006); the red
arrowhead points to the band corresponding to the full-length A20 protein. The corresponding western-blot analysis of Ub incorporation into poly-Ub
chains is shown. A higher amount of K11 linkage was detected than the K48 and K63 linkages.
552 Molecular Cell 40, 548–557, November 24, 2010 ª2010 Elsevier Inc.
Molecular Cell
Ubiquitin Binding to A20 ZnF4
targeting sites I and III had a less pronounced effect (summarized UbcH5A and RIP Interact with Regions of A20 Distinct
in Figure S3B), which is consistent with these sites contributing from ZnF4
less to mono-Ub binding but still being important for chain Full-length A20 shows clear specificity for the E2 UbcH5A and
recognition. NMR analysis of recombinant A20 ZnF4 carrying UbcH7 over other tested E2s, including the closely related
some of these mutations is consistent with proper folding of UbcH5B and UbcH5C (Wertz et al., 2004). To determine whether
the domain, thereby indicating that the impairment in ubiquitina- or not ZnF4 contributes to this specificity, we examined the inter-
tion is not due to a general folding defect (data not shown). action between UbcH5A and A20 ZnF3-4 by NMR spectroscopy.
To evaluate whether these mutations affect the ability of A20 to Surprisingly, the 15N,1H-HSQC spectrum of UbcH5A did not
regulate NF-kB signaling, we introduced the A20 ZnF4 double change upon addition of excess A20 ZnF3-4, indicating that
mutants (Y614A, L626R referred to as YALR, or Y614A, F615A the proteins do not interact appreciably under these conditions
referred to as YAFA) into A20 / murine embryonic fibroblast (Figure S4). In contrast, the 15N,1H-HSQC spectra of Ub changed
(MEF) cells. Cells without functional A20 have increased expres- upon addition of a slight excess of UbcH5A (Figure 4A). Chemical
sion of NF-kB reporter genes cyclin D2 and c-FLIP in response to shift mapping showed that the I44 hydrophobic patch on Ub was
stimulation with TNF-a (Honma et al., 2009). Transfection with responsible for UbcH5A binding (Figure 4B). Further changes in
DNA encoding wild-type A20 reduced relative expression of the 15N,1H-HSQC spectra of Ub were observed upon addition of
these genes by 50%. However, transfection with A20 A20 ZnF3-4, thereby suggesting that a trimeric complex was
harboring mutations in the Ub-binding sites (YALR or YAFA) formed (Figure 4C). The A20 ZnF3-4 interaction area on Ub
was unable to attenuate NF-kB signaling (Figure 3B). Because resides away from the UbcH5A contacting surface and was
expression of wild-type and A20 mutants was comparable, the mapped to the 50 s loop (Figure 4D). Therefore, in solution Ub
mutations are unlikely to have adversely affected the stability mediates the interaction between A20 ZnF3-4 and UbcH5A by
of A20 (Figure 3B, right panel). While these assays do not differ- acting as a molecular bridge.
entiate between impaired Ub ligase activity and the inability to To further characterize this interaction, we determined the
bind K63-linked poly-Ub, collectively these results indicate that crystal structure of a noncovalent ternary complex of A20
the capacity of A20 ZnF4 to attenuate NF-kB signaling is depen- ZnF4, Ub, and UbcH5A to a 3.4 Å resolution (Table 1). Consistent
dent on the Ub-binding surface of A20 ZnF4. Quantitative mass with the NMR data, this structure revealed minimal direct interac-
spectrometry examination of the in vitro A20-mediated ubiquiti- tion between A20 ZnF4 and UbcH5A (Figure 4E). In this ternary
nation unexpectedly revealed the generation of both K48- and complex, the 50 s loop of Ub associates with the N-terminal
K11-linkages in an A20-dependent manner (Figure 3C). These region of A20 ZnF4 and recapitulates the interaction seen at
data suggest that linkages associated with substrate downregu- site II of the A20 ZnF4-Ub complex. Simultaneously, the ‘‘back-
lation via proteosome-mediated degradation are the predomi- side’’ of UbcH5A binds the I44 hydrophobic patch on Ub, as was
nant result of A20-mediated ubiquitination. observed in the NMR structure of the UbcH5C-Ub complex
The preference of A20 ZnF4 for K63-linkages may serve to (Brzovic et al., 2006) and in the recent crystal structure of the
localize A20 to the proximity of substrates and/or it may facilitate UbcH5BUb covalent complex (Sakata et al., 2010). Although
depolymerization of K63-linked poly-Ub chains to mono-Ub for the backside interaction between UbcH5B/C and Ub has been
use in the resynthesis of a poly-Ub degradation signal. To further shown to be important for the processivity of several E3 ligases
explore the importance of the A20 ZnF domain in the deubiquiti- (Brzovic et al., 2006; Capili and Lima, 2007; Duda et al., 2007; Ed-
nase step of Ub editing, we assessed the ability of full-length or dins et al., 2006; Knipscheer et al., 2007; Sakata et al., 2010), its
OTU-only A20 constructs to disassemble linear, K63-, K48-, and relevance for A20 ligase activity is not clear. A model of the
K11-linked poly-Ub chains. These studies show that in vitro, charged thioester-linked UbcH5AUb and A20 ZnF4 ternary
both full-length and OTU-only constructs are able to disas- complex based on charged Ubc13Ub (Eddins et al., 2006)
semble K63-, K48-, and K11-linked poly-Ub chains but not linear also indicates no direct contact between A20 ZnF4 and UbcH5A
poly-Ub chains (Figure 3D). Librated mono-Ub would then be (Figure 4F). Thus, the segment of A20 responsible for E2 speci-
available for incorporation into new chains (Figures S3C and ficity probably lies outside ZnF4.
S3D). However, while the entire A20 ZnF region, including In order to map the molecular determinants for E2 specificity
ZnF4, is dispensable for deubiquitinase activity, both the A20 within A20, we monitored the auto-ubiquitination of full-length
OTU and A20 ZnF4 domains are required for the Ub editing A20 as well as truncated versions of the ZnF region (ZnF1-7,
process because targeted mutations to either domain result in ZnF1-4, ZnF3-4, and ZnF4-7) in the concomitant presence of
stabilization of the A20 substrate RIP1 in a cellular context (Wertz UbcH5 homologs (Figure 5A). Only segments of A20 containing
et al., 2004). Moreover, because the physiological role of A20 is ZnF5-7 retained specificity for UbcH5A. In contrast, fragments
to facilitate downregulation of NF-kB activity by removal of containing ZnF3-4 and ZnF1-4 lacked E2 specificity and worked
substrate from signaling complexes, additional interactions equally well with UbcH5A, UbcH5B, and UbcH5C. As a control,
may be present in vivo that modulate which Ub-linkages are we also monitored the ability of these fragments to facilitate
subject to depolymerization by A20 DUB activity. ubiquitination in conjunction with UbcH7. All fragments promote
(D) A20 OTU does not depolymerize linear poly-Ub. Depolymerization time course for tetra-Ub with linear, K48, K63, and K11 linkages in the presence of
full-length WT A20 (right) or a construct containing only the A20 OTU domain (left) is shown. K48-, K63-, and K11-linked poly-Ub chains are broken
down.
See Figure S3 for supporting material.
Molecular Cell 40, 548–557, November 24, 2010 ª2010 Elsevier Inc. 553
Molecular Cell
Ubiquitin Binding to A20 ZnF4
A B E
C
105
L73 Ub
110
T9
K11 L71 Q40
ZnF4
N (ppm)
115
V70
K6 R74 I44
L69
120
S22
15
I44 R42 90o
Q49
125 G47
A46 L50
130
F46 K48
Ub apo UbcH5A C85
Ub + UbcH5A
10 9 8 7 6
1
H (ppm)
C D F
C
105
L73
110 T9 Ub
K11 L71 Q40
N (ppm)
115
V70 R74
K6
L69 R42
120
15
I44 Q49
D52
125 A46 G47 L50 E51
F46 K48 ZnF4 UbcH5A
Y59 R54
130 T55
Ub apo S57 D58
Ub + UbcH5A + ZnF3-4 Q62
10 9 8 7 6
1
H (ppm)
poly-ubiquitination, consistent with the data for the Escherichia whether A20 ZnF4 contributes to recognition of RIP1 in addition
coli-derived material (Figure 5A). to facilitating ubiquitination, we conducted binding studies
Finally, we investigated whether A20 ZnF4 is directly involved between endogenous RIP1 and various A20 deletion fragments.
in substrate recognition. Because A20 modifies K63-linked ubiq- These studies determined the region around and including A20
uitinated RIP1 to target it for proteosomal degradation, there ZnF1 (residues 386–453) to be essential for RIP1 binding (Figures
probably is a RIP1 recognition site in A20 that would distinguish 5B and 5C). The OTU domain and A20 ZnF2-3 segment also
RIP1 from other cellular factors. In our previous work, we showed contribute to RIP1 binding, but to a lesser extent. Thus, different
that full-length A20, but not constructs that lack A20 ZnF4 or regions of A20 make distinct and essential contributions to the
have mutations to A20 ZnF4, can facilitate RIP1 ubiquitination Ub editing process: (1) The OTU domain confers DUB activity,
leading to proteasome-mediated degradation. To determine (2) ZnF1 and surrounding residues promote RIP1 binding, (3)
554 Molecular Cell 40, 548–557, November 24, 2010 ª2010 Elsevier Inc.
Molecular Cell
Ubiquitin Binding to A20 ZnF4
A2 -N
C
MT MT ΔN ΔC1 ΔC2 ΔC3 ΔC4 A20-N
W tor
WT
0-
0
A2T
c
E2 enzyme: UbcH5A UbcH5B UbcH5C UbcH7
ve
IP: FLAG 98-
A20 construct: – – – – WB: RIP1
98-
full length IP: FLAG
WB: FLAG 64-
98-
50-
C-terminus
50- C D
H5A
A20 WT 1 OTU 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 790
A20 OTU MT 1 OTU C->A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 790 Ub 7
ZnF4-7 Zn7
A20 ZnF4 MT 1 OTU 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 790
A20 ΔN 68 OTU 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 790 OTU 1
Zn1 4
Zn4 6
Zn6
22- 5
Zn5
A20 ΔC1 1 OTU 1 2 3 4 659 2
Zn2 3
Zn3
ZnF4 binds Ub and facilitates poly-ubiquitination, and (4) ZnF5-7 and K63-linked di-Ub, where a-helical elements from NEMO
regulates UbcH5A specificity (Figures 5D and 5E). contact the tandem Ubs (Lo et al., 2009; Rahighi et al., 2009).
The recent complex structures of TAB2 and TAB3 Npl4 zinc
DISCUSSION finger (NZF) with K63-linked di-Ub show that some ZnFs are
capable of binding more than one Ub; however, the mode of
Numerous cellular processes are regulated through ubiquitina- interaction differs significantly from that seen here with A20
tion and deubiquitination and thus are critically dependent on ZnF4 (Kulathu et al., 2009; Sato et al., 2009). In the case of
the interaction between Ub and its binding partners (Harper TAB2 and TAB3, both distal and proximal Ubs use the I44
and Schulman, 2006). Precise regulation of the NF-kB pathway, surface to interact with distinctive surfaces on NZF and the
which is essential for proper cellular homeostasis, is critically binding modes differ from UIM and IUIM because NZF lacks
dependent on the presence of active A20 to facilitate Ub editing. an a-helix. The interaction with the distal Ub is mediated by
Our studies reveal that A20 ZnF4 is a K63-linkage recognition zinc-coordinating loops through a conserved Thr-Phe motif,
module and also show that mutations to this module result in whereas the proximal Ub binds to the TAB2 NZF surface around
the inability of A20 to properly regulate NF-kB signaling. L681 (Kulathu et al., 2009; Sato et al., 2009). Therefore, A20 ZnF4
The crystal structure of A20 ZnF4 bound to mono-Ub, NMR, and TAB NZF, as well as the K63-linkage-specific antibody
and other solution-phase characterization of A20 ZnF4 interac- (Newton et al., 2008), recognize K63-linked chains by binding
tions with defined-linkage poly-Ub reveal an extended three- specific Ub surfaces that are present in this linkage form, rather
interface binding site for K63-linked tri-Ub. One of the interfaces than directly interacting with the K63-linked isopeptide bond.
engages the Ub surface surrounding the TEK-box, revealing Our data also show that ZnF4 does not directly interact with
a role for this surface in mediating protein-protein interactions. UbcH5A and that the adjacent regions (ZnF5-7) are required
The interaction of A20 ZnF4 with K63-linked poly-Ub is of higher for E2 selectivity. Previous studies suggest that A20 operates
affinity and differs from observations made in the structural anal- in vivo as part of a multiprotein complex that includes TAXBP-1
ysis of NF-kB essential modulator (NEMO) interaction with linear and the E3 ligases Itch and RNF11 (Coornaert et al., 2008; Iha
Molecular Cell 40, 548–557, November 24, 2010 ª2010 Elsevier Inc. 555
Molecular Cell
Ubiquitin Binding to A20 ZnF4
et al., 2008; Shembade et al., 2007, 2008, 2009), implicating an SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
additional level of complexity in A20 modulation of the NF-kB
Supplemental Information includes four figures and Supplemental Experi-
pathway. A recent study linking A20 ZnF4-dependent downre-
mental Procedures and can be found with this article online at doi:10.1016/j.
gulation of Ubc13 and UbcH5C to inhibition of NF-kB signaling molcel.2010.10.009.
(Shembade et al., 2010) is consistent with our observations
regarding the importance of A20 ZnF4. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
In summary, structural and functional data presented here link
A20 ZnF4 directly to three of the unique functions of A20: K63- We thank our colleagues Deanne Compaan, Ping Wu, Karen M. O’Rourke, Fer-
linked poly-Ub chain recognition, A20-mediated generation of nando Bazan, Andreas Lingel, Jeremy Flinders, Brent Appleton, Till Maurer,
poly-Ub chains, and NF-kB signal modulation. In contrast, we Erin Dueber, Anna Fedorova, and Allison Bruce for reagents and technical
advice. The Advanced Light Source and the Berkeley Center for Structural
show that A20 ZnF4 is not required for other critical aspects of
Biology are supported by the Department of Energy, National Institutes of
the Ub editing process such as interaction with RIP1 and depo- Health, and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences. All authors
lymerization of poly-Ub chains, or for direct interactions with E2 are or were employees of Genentech, Inc.
enzymes. The affinity of A20 ZnF4 for K63-linked poly-Ub chains
suggests that this interaction may recruit A20 to K63-linked poly- Received: December 18, 2009
ubiquitinated substrates within activated signaling complexes. Revised: July 7, 2010
Subsequent disassembly of the K63-linked poly-Ub chains by Accepted: August 27, 2010
Published: November 23, 2010
the A20 OTU domain could facilitate the resynthesis of degrada-
tive poly-Ub chains on substrates. Additional interactions with REFERENCES
other reported binding partners may also modulate A20 activity.
Our studies provide a molecular basis to explain why appropriate Blankenship, J.W., Varfolomeev, E., Goncharov, T., Fedorova, A.V., Kirkpa-
regulation of NF-kB signaling is dependent on functional A20 and trick, D.S., Izrael-Tomasevic, A., Phu, L., Arnott, D., Aghajan, M., Zobel, K.,
why Ub editing, which is central to A20 function, is critically et al. (2009). Ubiquitin binding modulates IAP antagonist-stimulated proteaso-
dependent on A20 ZnF4. mal degradation of c-IAP1 and c-IAP2(1). Biochem. J. 417, 149–160.
Brzovic, P.S., Lissounov, A., Christensen, D.E., Hoyt, D.W., and Klevit, R.E.
(2006). A UbcH5/ubiquitin noncovalent complex is required for processive
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES BRCA1-directed ubiquitination. Mol. Cell 21, 873–880.
Capili, A.D., and Lima, C.D. (2007). Structure and analysis of a complex
A detailed description of all experimental procedures is provided in the
between SUMO and Ubc9 illustrates features of a conserved E2-Ubl interac-
Supplemental Information.
tion. J. Mol. Biol. 369, 608–618.
Compagno, M., Lim, W.K., Grunn, A., Nandula, S.V., Brahmachary, M., Shen,
Protein Chemistry, In Vitro Ubiquitination, and Linkage Analysis Q., Bertoni, F., Ponzoni, M., Scandurra, M., Califano, A., et al. (2009). Muta-
by Mass Spectrometry tions of multiple genes cause deregulation of NF-kappaB in diffuse large
Recombinant proteins were expressed in E. coli as described in the Supple- B-cell lymphoma. Nature 459, 717–721.
mental Information. Simultaneous in vitro ubiquitination and deubiquitination
Coornaert, B., Baens, M., Heyninck, K., Bekaert, T., Haegman, M., Staal, J.,
assays were performed at 30 C for the indicated time periods. Samples
Sun, L., Chen, Z.J., Marynen, P., and Beyaert, R. (2008). T cell antigen receptor
were western-blotted for A20 or for K48- or K63-linked poly-Ub chains.
stimulation induces MALT1 paracaspase-mediated cleavage of the NF-
Peptides were separated by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chroma-
kappaB inhibitor A20. Nat. Immunol. 9, 263–271.
tography (HPLC), and analyses were performed using either multiple-reaction
monitoring on a QTrap4000 mass spectrometer or narrow-window-extracted Coornaert, B., Carpentier, I., and Beyaert, R. (2009). A20: central gatekeeper in
ion chromatograms from an LTQ-Orbitrap. Binding studies employing NMR inflammation and immunity. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 8217–8221.
spectroscopy used 15N,1H-HSQC spectra of isotope-labeled A20 ZnF4, A20 De Valck, D., Jin, D.Y., Heyninck, K., Van de Craen, M., Contreras, R., Fiers,
ZnF3-4, Ub, or UbcH5A and an unlabeled binding protein partner. W., Jeang, K.T., and Beyaert, R. (1999). The zinc finger protein A20 interacts
with a novel anti-apoptotic protein which is cleaved by specific caspases.
Oncogene 18, 4182–4190.
Structure Determination
Crystals of the A20 ZnF4-Ub and A20 ZnF4-Ub-UbcH5A complexes diffracted Duda, D.M., van Waardenburg, R.C., Borg, L.A., McGarity, S., Nourse, A.,
to 2.5 Å and 3.4 Å resolution, respectively (Table 1). Data were collected at Waddell, M.B., Bjornsti, M.A., and Schulman, B.A. (2007). Structure of
Advanced Light Source (ALS) beamlines 5.0.1 and 5.0.2. The structure of the a SUMO-binding-motif mimic bound to Smt3p-Ubc9p: conservation of
ZnF4-Ub complex was solved using the refined coordinates of Ub (PDB ID a non-covalent ubiquitin-like protein-E2 complex as a platform for selective
code 1UBQ) (Vijay-Kumar et al., 1987) and Rabex-5 ZnF (PDB ID code 2FID) interactions within a SUMO pathway. J. Mol. Biol. 369, 619–630.
(Lee et al., 2006). The asymmetric unit contained eight A20 ZnF4 molecules Eddins, M.J., Carlile, C.M., Gomez, K.M., Pickart, C.M., and Wolberger, C.
and eight Ub molecules, with each A20 ZnF4 contacting three Ubs. For the (2006). Mms2-Ubc13 covalently bound to ubiquitin reveals the structural basis
A20 ZnF4-Ub-UbcH5A complex, the refined coordinates of ZnF4, Ub (PDB ID of linkage-specific polyubiquitin chain formation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13,
code 1UBQ), and UbcH5C (PDB ID code 1X23) were used as search models. 915–920.
The crystallographic asymmetric unit contained two copies of the ternary Evans, P.C., Ovaa, H., Hamon, M., Kilshaw, P.J., Hamm, S., Bauer, S., Ploegh,
complex. All structural figures were made with PyMOL (http://www.pymol.org/). H.L., and Smith, T.S. (2004). Zinc-finger protein A20, a regulator of inflamma-
tion and cell survival, has de-ubiquitinating activity. Biochem. J. 378, 727–734.
ACCESSION NUMBERS Garnett, M.J., Mansfeld, J., Godwin, C., Matsusaka, T., Wu, J., Russell, P.,
Pines, J., and Venkitaraman, A.R. (2009). UBE2S elongates ubiquitin chains
Atomic coordinates for the reported crystal structures have been deposited on APC/C substrates to promote mitotic exit. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 1363–1369.
with the PDB and assigned accession codes of 3OJ3 (A20 ZnF4-Ub complex) Graham, R.R., Cotsapas, C., Davies, L., Hackett, R., Lessard, C.J., Leon, J.M.,
and 3OJ4 (A20 ZnF4-Ub-UbcH5A complex). Burtt, N.P., Guiducci, C., Parkin, M., Gates, C., et al. (2008). Genetic variants
556 Molecular Cell 40, 548–557, November 24, 2010 ª2010 Elsevier Inc.
Molecular Cell
Ubiquitin Binding to A20 ZnF4
near TNFAIP3 on 6q23 are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. regulator TNFAIP3 (A20) is inactivated by somatic mutations and genomic
Nat. Genet. 40, 1059–1061. deletions in marginal zone lymphomas. Blood 113, 4918–4921.
Harper, J.W., and Schulman, B.A. (2006). Structural complexity in ubiquitin Opipari, A.W., Jr., Boguski, M.S., and Dixit, V.M. (1990). The A20 cDNA
recognition. Cell 124, 1133–1136. induced by tumor necrosis factor alpha encodes a novel type of zinc finger
Hicke, L., Schubert, H.L., and Hill, C.P. (2005). Ubiquitin-binding domains. Nat. protein. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 14705–14708.
Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 610–621. Penengo, L., Mapelli, M., Murachelli, A.G., Confalonieri, S., Magri, L., Musac-
Honma, K., Tsuzuki, S., Nakagawa, M., Tagawa, H., Nakamura, S., Morishima, chio, A., Di Fiore, P.P., Polo, S., and Schneider, T.R. (2006). Crystal structure of
Y., and Seto, M. (2009). TNFAIP3/A20 functions as a novel tumor suppressor the ubiquitin binding domains of rabex-5 reveals two modes of interaction with
gene in several subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Blood 114, 2467–2475. ubiquitin. Cell 124, 1183–1195.
Hurley, J.H., Lee, S., and Prag, G. (2006). Ubiquitin-binding domains. Bio- Pickart, C.M. (2001). Mechanisms underlying ubiquitination. Annu. Rev. Bio-
chem. J. 399, 361–372. chem. 70, 503–533.
Hymowitz, S.G., and Wertz, I.E. (2010). A20: from ubiquitin editing to tumour Plenge, R.M., Cotsapas, C., Davies, L., Price, A.L., de Bakker, P.I., Maller, J.,
suppression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 10, 332–341. Pe’er, I., Burtt, N.P., Blumenstiel, B., DeFelice, M., et al. (2007). Two indepen-
dent alleles at 6q23 associated with risk of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Genet. 39,
Iha, H., Peloponese, J.M., Verstrepen, L., Zapart, G., Ikeda, F., Smith, C.D.,
1477–1482.
Starost, M.F., Yedavalli, V., Heyninck, K., Dikic, I., et al. (2008). Inflammatory
cardiac valvulitis in TAX1BP1-deficient mice through selective NF-kappaB Rahighi, S., Ikeda, F., Kawasaki, M., Akutsu, M., Suzuki, N., Kato, R., Kensche,
activation. EMBO J. 27, 629–641. T., Uejima, T., Bloor, S., Komander, D., et al. (2009). Specific recognition of
linear ubiquitin chains by NEMO is important for NF-kappaB activation. Cell
Iwai, K., and Tokunaga, F. (2009). Linear polyubiquitination: a new regulator of
136, 1098–1109.
NF-kappaB activation. EMBO Rep. 10, 706–713.
Sakata, E., Satoh, T., Yamamoto, S., Yamaguchi, Y., Yagi-Utsumi, M., Kuri-
Jin, L., Williamson, A., Banerjee, S., Philipp, I., and Rape, M. (2008). Mecha-
moto, E., Tanaka, K., Wakatsuki, S., and Kato, K. (2010). Crystal structure of
nism of ubiquitin-chain formation by the human anaphase-promoting
UbcH5bubiquitin intermediate: insight into the formation of the self-assem-
complex. Cell 133, 653–665.
bled E2Ub conjugates. Structure 18, 138–147.
Kato, M., Sanada, M., Kato, I., Sato, Y., Takita, J., Takeuchi, K., Niwa, A., Chen,
Sato, Y., Yoshikawa, A., Yamashita, M., Yamagata, A., and Fukai, S. (2009).
Y., Nakazaki, K., Nomoto, J., et al. (2009). Frequent inactivation of A20 in B-cell
Structural basis for specific recognition of Lys 63-linked polyubiquitin chains
lymphomas. Nature 459, 712–716.
by NZF domains of TAB2 and TAB3. EMBO J. 28, 3903–3909.
Kirkpatrick, D.S., Hathaway, N.A., Hanna, J., Elsasser, S., Rush, J., Finley, D.,
Schmitz, R., Hansmann, M.L., Bohle, V., Martin-Subero, J.I., Hartmann, S.,
King, R.W., and Gygi, S.P. (2006). Quantitative analysis of in vitro ubiquitinated
Mechtersheimer, G., Klapper, W., Vater, I., Giefing, M., Gesk, S., et al.
cyclin B1 reveals complex chain topology. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 700–710.
(2009). TNFAIP3 (A20) is a tumor suppressor gene in Hodgkin lymphoma
Knipscheer, P., van Dijk, W.J., Olsen, J.V., Mann, M., and Sixma, T.K. (2007). and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma. J. Exp. Med. 206, 981–989.
Noncovalent interaction between Ubc9 and SUMO promotes SUMO chain
Shembade, N., Harhaj, N.S., Liebl, D.J., and Harhaj, E.W. (2007). Essential role
formation. EMBO J. 26, 2797–2807.
for TAX1BP1 in the termination of TNF-alpha-, IL-1- and LPS-mediated NF-
Komander, D., and Barford, D. (2008). Structure of the A20 OTU domain and kappaB and JNK signaling. EMBO J. 26, 3910–3922.
mechanistic insights into deubiquitination. Biochem. J. 409, 77–85. Shembade, N., Harhaj, N.S., Parvatiyar, K., Copeland, N.G., Jenkins, N.A.,
Kulathu, Y., Akutsu, M., Bremm, A., Hofmann, K., and Komander, D. (2009). Matesic, L.E., and Harhaj, E.W. (2008). The E3 ligase Itch negatively regulates
Two-sided ubiquitin binding explains specificity of the TAB2 NZF domain. inflammatory signaling pathways by controlling the function of the ubiquitin-
Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 1328–1330. editing enzyme A20. Nat. Immunol. 9, 254–262.
Lee, E.G., Boone, D.L., Chai, S., Libby, S.L., Chien, M., Lodolce, J.P., and Ma, Shembade, N., Parvatiyar, K., Harhaj, N.S., and Harhaj, E.W. (2009). The ubiq-
A. (2000). Failure to regulate TNF-induced NF-kappaB and cell death uitin-editing enzyme A20 requires RNF11 to downregulate NF-kappaB signal-
responses in A20-deficient mice. Science 289, 2350–2354. ling. EMBO J. 28, 513–522.
Lee, S., Tsai, Y.C., Mattera, R., Smith, W.J., Kostelansky, M.S., Weissman, A.M., Shembade, N., Ma, A., and Harhaj, E.W. (2010). Inhibition of NF-kappaB
Bonifacino, J.S., and Hurley, J.H. (2006). Structural basis for ubiquitin recogni- signaling by A20 through disruption of ubiquitin enzyme complexes. Science
tion and autoubiquitination by Rabex-5. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 264–271. 327, 1135–1139.
Lin, S.C., Chung, J.Y., Lamothe, B., Rajashankar, K., Lu, M., Lo, Y.C., Lam, Thomson, W., Barton, A., Ke, X., Eyre, S., Hinks, A., Bowes, J., Donn, R., Sym-
A.Y., Darnay, B.G., and Wu, H. (2008). Molecular basis for the unique deubiqui- mons, D., Hider, S., Bruce, I.N., et al; Wellcome Trust Case Control Consor-
tinating activity of the NF-kappaB inhibitor A20. J. Mol. Biol. 376, 526–540. tium; YEAR Consortium. (2007). Rheumatoid arthritis association at 6q23.
Lo, Y.C., Lin, S.C., Rospigliosi, C.C., Conze, D.B., Wu, C.J., Ashwell, J.D., Eli- Nat. Genet. 39, 1431–1433.
ezer, D., and Wu, H. (2009). Structural basis for recognition of diubiquitins by Van Huffel, S., Delaei, F., Heyninck, K., De Valck, D., and Beyaert, R. (2001).
NEMO. Mol. Cell 33, 602–615. Identification of a novel A20-binding inhibitor of nuclear factor-k B activation
Mattera, R., Tsai, Y.C., Weissman, A.M., and Bonifacino, J.S. (2006). The Rab5 termed ABIN-2. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 30216–30223.
guanine nucleotide exchange factor Rabex-5 binds ubiquitin (Ub) and func- Vijay-Kumar, S., Bugg, C.E., and Cook, W.J. (1987). Structure of ubiquitin
tions as a Ub ligase through an atypical Ub-interacting motif and a zinc finger refined at 1.8 A resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 194, 531–544.
domain. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 6874–6883. Wertz, I.E., O’Rourke, K.M., Zhou, H., Eby, M., Aravind, L., Seshagiri, S., Wu,
Musone, S.L., Taylor, K.E., Lu, T.T., Nititham, J., Ferreira, R.C., Ortmann, W., P., Wiesmann, C., Baker, R., Boone, D.L., et al. (2004). De-ubiquitination and
Shifrin, N., Petri, M.A., Kamboh, M.I., Manzi, S., et al. (2008). Multiple polymor- ubiquitin ligase domains of A20 downregulate NF-kappaB signalling. Nature
phisms in the TNFAIP3 region are independently associated with systemic 430, 694–699.
lupus erythematosus. Nat. Genet. 40, 1062–1064. Williamson, A., Wickliffe, K.E., Mellone, B.G., Song, L., Karpen, G.H., and
Newton, K., Matsumoto, M.L., Wertz, I.E., Kirkpatrick, D.S., Lill, J.R., Tan, J., Rape, M. (2009). Identification of a physiological E2 module for the human
Dugger, D., Gordon, N., Sidhu, S.S., Fellouse, F.A., et al. (2008). Ubiquitin anaphase-promoting complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 18213–18218.
chain editing revealed by polyubiquitin linkage-specific antibodies. Cell 134, Xu, P., Duong, D.M., Seyfried, N.T., Cheng, D., Xie, Y., Robert, J., Rush, J.,
668–678. Hochstrasser, M., Finley, D., and Peng, J. (2009). Quantitative proteomics
Novak, U., Rinaldi, A., Kwee, I., Nandula, S.V., Rancoita, P.M., Compagno, M., reveals the function of unconventional ubiquitin chains in proteasomal degra-
Cerri, M., Rossi, D., Murty, V.V., Zucca, E., et al. (2009). The NF-kB negative dation. Cell 137, 133–145.
Molecular Cell 40, 548–557, November 24, 2010 ª2010 Elsevier Inc. 557