Geotechnical Report: Rev. Date Issued For Issued by Reviewed by Approved by Approved

993462-5700-G-GF-INF-001 Rev.
1
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
P063-214 SHOUGANG
COMPLEMENTARY GEOTECHNICAL STUDY FOR
FOUNDATION DESIGN OF “CONVEYOR BELT SYSTEM Page.: i
5841-CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
SHOUGANG HIERRO PERU S.A.A.
COMPLEMENTARY GEOTECHNICAL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN OF

“CONVEYOR BELT SYSTEM 5841-CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
SHP CODE: 993462-5700-G-GF-INF-001
CONTRACTOR CODE: P063-214 SHOUGANG
Hellen de la Jorge
A 10-11-2017 SHP Review Zenon Aguilar
Cruz Campos
Hellen de la Jorge
B 13-11-2017 SHP Review Zenon Aguilar
Cruz Campos
Rev. Date Issued for Issued by Reviewed by Approved by SHP Approved
SHOUGANG HIERRO PERU. S.A.A.

993462-5700-G-GF-INF-001 Rev. 1
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
P063-214 SHOUGANG
FOUNDATION DESIGN OF “CONVEYOR BELT SYSTEM Page.: ii
5841-CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
Table of Contents
1. EXCECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ 1
2. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 5
2.1 General Remarks ............................................................................................................. 5
2.2 Objetives y Scope ............................................................................................................. 5
2.3 Review of Existing Information ......................................................................................... 5
2.3.1 Review of Existing Studies ................................................................................... 6
2.3.2 Review of Geotechnical Studies ........................................................................... 6
2.3.2.1 Pits ............................................................................................. 6
2.3.2.2 Boreholes ................................................................................... 7
3. GENERAL SITE INFORMATION .............................................................................................. 8
3.1 Location ............................................................................................................................ 8
3.2 Geology ............................................................................................................................ 8
3.2.1 Regional Geology ................................................................................................. 8
3.2.1.1 Regional geomorphology ........................................................... 8
3.2.1.2 Regional lithology....................................................................... 8
3.2.1.3 Regional geo-structural ............................................................ 11
3.2.2 Local geology ...................................................................................................... 11
3.2.2.1 Local geomorphology............................................................... 11
3.2.2.2 Geodynamics ........................................................................... 11
3.2.3 Geomorphological aspects ................................................................................. 11
3.2.4 Lithostratigraphic aspects ................................................................................... 12
3.2.5 Geo structural aspects ........................................................................................ 13
3.2.6 Geological Hazards ............................................................................................ 13
3.2.7 Geotechnical considerations............................................................................... 13
3.3 Seismicity ....................................................................................................................... 14
3.3.1 Seismic History of the Study Region .................................................................. 14
4. GEOTECHNICAL FIELD INVESTIGATIONS ......................................................................... 18
4.1 General ........................................................................................................................... 18
4.2 Pits .................................................................................................................................. 18
4.3 DPL test .......................................................................................................................... 19
4.4 Geophysical tests ........................................................................................................... 21
4.4.1 Theoretical basis of geophysical tests ................................................................ 21
4.4.1.1 Seismic Refraction Test ........................................................... 21
4.4.1.2 MASW test ............................................................................... 22
4.4.2 Description of field geophysical tests ................................................................. 23
4.4.3 Results and interpretation of results ................................................................... 23
4.4.3.1 Seismic Refraction ................................................................... 23
4.4.3.2 MASW probes .......................................................................... 26
4.5 Seismic considerations ................................................................................................... 27
4.6 Geomechanical stations ................................................................................................. 28
4.7 Water Level .................................................................................................................... 28
5. LABORATORY TESTS ........................................................................................................... 29
6. GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF THE FOUNDATION ......................................................... 29
6.1 Foundation Material ........................................................................................................ 29
6.2 Type of Foundations ....................................................................................................... 30
6.3 Depth of Foundations ..................................................................................................... 31
6.4 Elastic Parameters ......................................................................................................... 32
6.5 Geotechnical Parameters ............................................................................................... 33
6.6 Methodologies for the calculation of admissible load capacity ...................................... 33
6.6.1 Buisman-Terzaghi (Terzaghi 1943) .................................................................... 33
6.6.2 Meyerhof (1963) ................................................................................................. 35
6.7 Admissible Load Capacity Results ................................................................................. 39

993462-5700-G-GF-INF-001 Rev. 1
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
P063-214 SHOUGANG
FOUNDATION DESIGN OF “CONVEYOR BELT SYSTEM Page.: iii
5841-CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
6.7.1 Belt 5841-CB-110 and 5851-CB-110 – Footing.................................................. 39

6.7.2 Transfer Towers and Electrical Substation – Foundation Slabs ......................... 42
6.8 Elastic or immediate settlement ..................................................................................... 42
6.9 Settlement Results ......................................................................................................... 44
6.9.1 Belt 5841-CB-110 and 5851-CB-110 – Footing.................................................. 44
6.9.2 Transfer Towers and Electrical Substation – Foundation Slabs........................ 47
7. CHEMICAL SOIL AGGRESSION ........................................................................................... 47
8. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................... 49

993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
COMPLEMENTARY GEOTECHNICAL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN
OF “CONVEYOR BELT SYSTEM 5841-CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110” Date: November 2017
Page.: 1 de 55
1. EXCECUTIVE SUMMARY
• SHP requested the services of ZER GEOSYSTEM PERU SAC (ZER) to carry out the
Complementary Geotechnical Study for Foundation Design of "Conveyor Belt System 5841-CB-
110 and 5851-CB-110" that is part of the project "Expansion of Mine Operations and Benefit
Plant". This project is located in the area of San Nicolas, district of Marcona, province of Nazca,
in the Ica region.
• The objective of this study is to know the physical and mechanical characteristics of the different
soils that conform the sites where the Conveyor Belts 5841-CB-110 and 5851-CB-110, transfer
towers TT3-6 and TT2-7 and the Substation 5840-ER-100 will be founded, based on the field
research carried out by ZER and complemented with the geotechnical study carried out in the
area by Anddes and CWE in 2016 and 2014, respectively. Also, to establish foundation depths
and design the foundation elements of the structures that conform the project.
• The field work was carried out between October 14 and 20, 2017 and consisted of excavation of
eleven (11) test pits with mechanical equipment, reaching a maximum depth of 4.70 m, fourteen
(14) DPL tests that reached a maximum depth of 2.60 m, thirteen (13) MASW tests, fourteen (14)
lines of seismic refraction, as well as the sampling of disturbed soil samples and geological
mapping. Plano 993 462-5700-G-GF-DWG-002 shows the location of the field research, which
were distributed according to the location of the supporting structures of Belts 5841-CB-110,
5851-CB-110 and structures of the TT3-6 and TT2-7 transfer towers.
The geotechnical logging (trenches T-01 and T-02) of the cut slopes observed near the existing
transfer towers belonging to each under study belt was also carried out.
• Based on the Peruvian Technical Standard on Seismic Design E-030 (2016), the obtained shear
wave velocities were compared with the characteristic velocity ranges for soils in order to define
the seismic site conditions. The average shear wave velocities for the first 30.0m of ground depth
(Vs30) obtained from the MASW tests are shown in the following table, along with the
classification of the soil profile according to the current regulations.
Classification of soil profiles obtained from the MASW tests
Vs30 Soil Profile Classification

TEST
(m/seg) (E030, 2016)
S0
MASW 03 1594
(Hard Rock)
MASW 01 1342
MASW 02 1225
MASW 04 542 S1
MASW 05 772 (Rock or Very Dense
MASW 01’ 1124 Soils)
MASW 02’ 1304
MASW 03’ 663
MASW 06 361
MASW 07 330
S2
MASW 08 392 (Stiff Soil Profiles)
MASW 09 428
MASW 04’ 466
1
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 2 de 55
Therefore, for the structural analysis of the structure, according to the Technical Standard on
Seismic Design E.030 (2016), considering the location of the project and the classification of the
type of soil, the following parameters are available:
Zone factor (Z): 0.45 (Zone 04, see section 2.2 of the E.030 Standard)
Type of soil profile: S1
Soil factor (S): 1.00
Period Tp: 0.4 seconds
Period TL: 2.5 seconds
Type of Soil profile: S2

Soil factor (S): 1.05
Period Tp: 0.6 seconds
Period TL: 2.0 seconds
• According to the field work, the groundwater level was NOT detected in any of the pits and tests
carried out by ZER and also in the drilling carried out by CWE (2014) and Anddes (2016). As a
conclusion, it can be affirmed that in the study area there is no evidence of the presence of
groundwater table up to the maximum depth investigated of 10 m in the perforations carried out
by CWE (2014).
• The laboratory tests of the soil and rock samples were made in the geotechnical laboratory of
GEOFRONTIER PERU S.A.C, LABORATORIOS LASA INGENIEROS S.A. and the Rock
Mechanics Laboratory of the FIGMM UNI, which are detailed below:
07 granulometric analysis by sieving, 07 determination of the liquid limit, plastic limit and the
plasticity index of the soils, 07 Determination of the moisture content in soils and rock, 04 direct
shear tests, 01 UU triaxial test, 04 volumetric weight test for cohesive soil, 04 uniaxial
compression test for rock, 02 point load in rock, 05 physical properties tests, 09 chemical analysis
of soluble chlorides content in soils, 09 chemical analysis of soluble sulfates content in soils, 09
chemical analysis of soluble salts content, 03 determination of hydrogen potential (pH) of water
and 01 macroscopic petrographic test.
• According to the records of the geotechnical field tests and the results of the laboratory tests of
soil and rock mechanics, the geotechnical characterization of the materials that will conform the
foundation stratum was carried out. Three types of foundation materials have been defined for
all the area where the structures of the conveyor belts 5841-CB-110, 5851-CB-110, transfer
towers TT3-6, TT2-7 and electrical sub station 5840-ER-100 will be settled down.
Foundation Material I (MC-1) .- Intrusive igneous rock - Monzogranite: igneous rock of coarse
to fine texture, pinky to greenish gray, strongly fractured with the presence of andesitic dikes. This
rock is generally characterized by having medium strength (R3) and a basic RMR of 40 (regular
rock).
Foundation Material II (MC-2) .- Sedimentary Clastic Rock - Sandstone, Limoarcillite: It consists
of coarse-grained conglomerate sandstones, yellowish tones and cemented by solutions of
calcareous material. Secondary minerals are seen as iron oxides, gypsum, carbonates and also,
the hydrothermal alteration has made the rock increase its hardness. It presents SUCS
classifications of low plasticity sandy silt (ML), low plasticity silt with sand (ML) and clayish and
silty sand (SC-SM).
Foundation Material III (MC-3) .- Silty and sandy gravels and gravel, hard cemented gravels:
Thick conglomerate layered with sand, silt and clay that is covered superficially by eolic sands of
2
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 3 de 55
medium to fine grains of igneous origin, cemented by solutions of calcareous material and whose
thickness can reach up to 15 m. It presents SUCS classifications of poorly graded sand with silt
(SP-SM), poorly graded gravel (GP) and poorly graded gravel with silt (GP-GM).
Plano 993 462-5700-G-GF-DWG-003 shows the distribution of these foundation materials defined
for the present project.
• According to the information provided by SHP, the structures that conform the conveyor belts
5841-CB-110 and 5851-CB-110 will be settled down on shallow isolated footings, which will be
deployed on the three types of foundation materials found. The transfer towers TT3-6 and TT2-7
as well as the electrical sub-station 5840-ER-100 will be emplaced by means of foundation slab,
which will be necessarily deployed on the igneous monzogranite rock.
The following table shows the type of foundation and the minimum foundation depth (Df) for each
structure that conform the present study. In addition, the support identification number and the
material on which the supports of each of the aforementioned conveyor belts will be located is
indicated. The foundation depths of the footings and foundation slab varies between 1.5 to 3.5 m.
Foundation Material, Foundation Type and Minimum Foundation Depth (Df) for each
Structure
BELT / FOUNDATION TYPE OF Df (m)

SUPPORT
STRUCTURE MATERIAL FOUNDATION min.
Intrusive igneous rock -

From 144 to 153 1.50
Monzogranite
Sedimentary Clastic
From 11 to 100 and
5841-CB-110 from 140 to 143
Rock - Sandstone, Isolated 2.00
Limoarcillites Footing
Silty Sandy Gravels and

From 101 to 139 gravely sands, hard 2.00
cemented graves

From 0 to 7 1.50
Monzogranite
Isolated
5851-CB-110 Sedimentary Clastic Footing
From 8 to 14 Rock - Sandstone, 2.00
Limoarcillites
Transfer Tower Intrusive igneous rock -
- 1.50
TT3-6 Monzogranite

TT2-7
-
Monzogranite
Foundation 1.50
Slab
Electrical
Substation -
Monzogranite
1.50
5840-ER-100
The admissible load capacity of the footings on the different foundation materials will be
determined through the methodology described by Meyerhof (1963) in the case of foundations on
soils, while the admissible load capacity in rock will be estimated using the Busimam-Terzaghi
methodology. (Terzaghi 1943). The theory of elasticity was used to calculate settlements in soils
and rocks (Lambe and Whitman, 1969).
• Below is a summary of the shear strength parameters for the three types of foundation materials
involved in the analysis of allowable load capacity and calculation of elastic settlements. These
3
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 4 de 55
geotechnical parameters apply to the design of foundations of all the structures that conform the
project.
Summary of the shear strength parameters for the three types of foundation materials
Specific Internal Module of

Cohesión Poisson
FOUNDATION MATERIAL Weight Friction Young "E"
"c" (Mpa) Ratio "µ"
(gr/cm3) Angle (Ø) (Mpa)
2.60 32 0.12 2000 0.30
Monzogranite
Sedimentary Clastic Rock -
2.10 30 0 107.5 0.39
Sandstone, Limoarcillites
Silty sandy gravels and gravelly

1.90 35 0 95 0.29
sands, hard cemented gravel
• Results of admissible load capacity of footings:

Belt 5841-CB-110 and 5851-CB-110 - Footing:
Intrusive igneous rock - Monzogranite: Between 8.81 kg/cm 2 to 12.34 kg/cm2
Sedimentary Clastic Rock - Sandstone, Limoarcillites: Between 1.59 kg/cm 2 to 3.50 kg/cm2
Silty sandy gravels and gravelly sands, hard cemented gravel: Between 2.55 kg/cm 2 to 5.10
kg/cm2
Transfer Towers TT3-6 and TT2-7 and Electrical Substation 5840-ER-100 - Foundation Slabs:
Intrusive igneous rock - Monzogranite: Between 15.11 kg / cm2 to 21.09 kg / cm2
• Results of settlements:
Belt 5841-CB-110 and 5851-CB-110 - Footing:
Intrusive igneous rock - Monzogranite: Between 0.02 cm to 0.18 cm.
Sedimentary Clastic Rock - Sandstone, Limoarcillites: Between 0.08 cm to 0.93 cm.
Silty sandy gravels and gravelly sands, hard cemented gravel: Between 0.18 cm to 1.49 cm.
Transfer Towers TT3-6 and TT2-7 and Electrical Substation 5840-ER-100 - Foundation Slabs:
Intrusive igneous rock - Monzogranite: Between 0.58 cm to 1.68 cm.
• When comparing the results obtained from the chemical laboratory with the indicated levels of
aggressive salt concentration, it is verified that the different foundation soils have high salt
concentration levels that will generate a severe attack on the concrete of the foundation.
The sulphate content of the foundation soil layers will cause a degree of severe alteration to
concrete of the foundation, for this reason it is recommended to use Type V cement in all the
foundation elements that will be in direct contact with the aforementioned layers. The average
concentration of chlorides present in the foundation materials is greater than the permissible limit,
which indicates that there is a risk of corrosion that could affect the steel of the foundation
elements when they come into contact with the external environment. Also, the concentration of
total soluble salts present in the soil and foundation rock is greater than the permissible limit.
According to these results obtained from the chemical analysis tests, leachable soils of low
solubility are presented.
Therefore, considerations by a specialist in structures are necessary to establish technical
considerations that guarantee the durability of the concrete under these adverse environment.
4
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 5 de 55
2. INTRODUCTION
2.1 General Remarks
Shougang Hierro Peru (hereinafter referred to as SHP) requested the services of ZER Geosystem
Peru SAC (hereinafter referred to as ZER) to carry out the Complementary Geotechnical Study for
Foundation design of "Conveyor Belt System 5841-CB-110 and 5851-CB- 110" that is part of the
"Expansion of Mine Operations and Benefit Plant” project. This project is located in the area of San
Nicolas, district of Marcona, province of Nasca, in the region of Ica.
The "Expansion of Mine Operations and Benefit Plant" project requires the development of basic
studies to carry out detailed engineering for the construction of the "Conveyor Belt System 5841-CB-
110 and 5851-CB-110". In 2014 China International Water & Electric Corp. (CWE) developed the
"Geotechnical Study - Package No. 6" and "Geotechnical Study - Package No. 10" reports. Later on,
in 2016 Anddes Asociados SAC developed the "Geotechnical Investigations for the New Benefit
Plant" report.
This report summarizes the complementary geotechnical and geological works carried out in the
study area and its subsequent analysis in the cabinet for the design of the foundation elements of
the involved structures. The exploration works include pit excavations, field tests, geophysical tests
and laboratory tests on representative samples of the soils that conform the foundation ground for
the "Conveyor Belt System 5841-CB-110 and 5851-CB-110". Furthermore, all the research carried
out in the field, data processing and foundation analysis, which forms the basis of the present
geotechnical study, are shown in annexes to the main report.
2.2 Objetives y Scope

The objective of this study is to know the physical and mechanical characteristics of the different
soils that conform the foundation ground of the "Conveyor Belt System 5841-CB-110 and 5851-CB-
110" based on the research carried out by ZER complemented with the information of the
geotechnical studies issued by Anddes and CWE, which were named in item 2.1. Then, to define the
foundation depth and designing the foundation elements for each of the structures that conform the
"Conveyor Belt System 5841-CB-110 and 5851-CB-110".
In this geotechnical study the results of the Foundation Design with their corresponding values of
admissible load capacity and maximum settlements are documented.
In order to meet these objectives, the following work plan has been developed:
• Collection of existing information from the study area.

• Digging of pits.
• Geophysical tests.
• DPL tests.
• Geological mapping
• Geological profiles.
• Analysis and evaluation of geotechnical and geological exploration, and laboratory results.
• Analysis and design of the foundations.
• Conclusions and recommendations
2.3 Review of Existing Information
For the development of the present study, the review of the information provided by SHP, consisting
of the studies carried out by CWE and Anddes, was included. Below are the documents that were
considered of interest for the development of this report.
5
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 6 de 55
• Report "Geotechnical Study - Package N ° 6", CWE, 2014.

• Report "Geotechnical Study - Package N ° 10", CWE, 2014.
• Report "Geotechnical Investigations for the New Benefit Plant", Anddes, 2016.
Below are the geotechnical field works and laboratory tests developed by those studies in the study
area.
2.3.1 Review of Existing Studies

CWE (2014) carried out the geotechnical study required by SHP for the Mixing Bed and Conveyor
Belts - Package N ° 6, of the Expansion of SHP project. The characteristics of the foundation soil
for the foundation of Conveyor Belts 5930-CB-110, 5931-CB-110, 5930-CB-120, 5841-CB-110, and
transfer towers: TT1-6 and TT1-3.2, as well as the Stacker 930-ST-110 and Drum Reclaimer 931-
RC110 were studied. As part of the geotechnical investigations carried out on the Conveyor Belt
5841-CB-110, three 10-meter deep boreholes and five mechanically excavated pits were carried
out. The phreatic level was not registered in the pits and boreholes within the explored depths.
CWE (2014) carried out the geotechnical study required by SHP for the projection of the
Concentrate Stock Platform and Strips 1: 5861-CB-120, Strip 2: 5861-CB-110 and Strip 5: 5851-
CB-110 ( Out of reach) of the Expansion of SHP project. The characteristics of the foundation soil
for the foundation of Conveyor Belts 5941-CB-110, 5945-CB-120, 5851-CB-110, transfer towers:
TT1-10, TT2-10 and TT5-10 were studied, as well as of the Stacker 5941-ST-110 and Reclaimer
5945-110 that are inside the Stock Concentrates platform with a length of 0.7km, Belt 2: 5861-CB-
110 with 0.5 Km, Belt 1: 5861-CB-120 with 0.9 Km, Belt 5: 5851-CB-110 (out of scope of the present
package) and finally the TT3-10 and TT4-110 towers. As part of the geotechnical field works carried
out on the Belt 5851-CB-110, three mechanically excavated pits were carried out. The phreatic
level was not recorded in the pits within the depths investigated.
Anddes (2016) carried out the geotechnical study required by SHP for the New Benefit Plant, the
Expansion of Mine Operations and Benefit Plant project. As part of the geotechnical investigations
carried out near Belt 5841-CB-110, Belt 5851-CB-110 and Transfer towers TT2-7 and TT3-6, five
boreholes of variable depths were carried out, a mechanical excavated pit, 4 seismic refraction
tests and 2 MASW tests. The phreatic level was not registered in the pits and boreholes within the
explored depths.
2.3.2 Review of Geotechnical Studies

For the development of the present study, the field works and laboratory tests presented in the
following studies were reviewed:
• Geotechnical Study - Package N ° 6, CWE (2014).
• Geotechnical Study - Package N ° 10, CWE (2014).
• Geotechnical Investigations for the New Benefit Plant, Anddes (2016).
2.3.2.1 Pits
CWE (2014) carried out 5 pits up to 3.40 m deep (see Map 992461-5840-D-GF-DWG-1003) in the
projected area of Belt 5841-CB-110 and 03 pits up to 2.60 m deep ( see Map 992465-5940-D-GF-
DWG-1007) in the projected area of Belt 5851-CB-110. Table 2.1 shows the summary of pits where
the groundwater level was not registered up to the explored depth.
Table 2.1 – Summary of Pits – CWE (2014)
COORDINATES UTM* ROCK TOTAL

GROUNDWATER
LOCATION PITS LEVEL DEPTH
EAST NORTH LEVEL (m)
(m) (m)
C-8 476710 8313188 NE NE 3.00
6
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 7 de 55

GROUNDWATER
(m) (m)
C-9 476653 8312975 NE NE 3.40
Belt 6: 5841- C-10 476599 8312726 NE NE 0.70

CB-110 C-11 476550 8312544 NE NE 1.40
C-12 476500 8312330 NE NE 1.30
C-19 476252 8312561 NE 0.35 1.35
Package 10 C-20 476275 8312510 NE NE 2.60
C-22 476327 8312393 NE 0.50 1.00
*: Ellipsoid reference WGS84
NE: Not found
Anddes (2016) made 01 pit of 2.50 m deep (see Map 993462-5700-G-GF-DWG-0001) in the
projected area of Belt 5851-CB-110. Table 2.2 shows the summary of the pit where the presence
of groundwater level was not recorded until the explored depth.
Table 2.2 – Summary of Pits – Anddes (2016)

GROUNDWATER
(m) (m)
Concentrated
CA-SHO15-109 476301 8312405 NE 2.50 2.50
Mineral
2.3.2.2 Boreholes
CWE (2014) carried out a total of 03 diamond boreholes (see Plano 992461-5840-D-GF-DWG-
1003) in the projected area of Belt 5841-CB-110 and Transfer Tower TT3-6, which were drilled in
October of 2014. Table 2.3 shows the summary of these boreholes where the groundwater level
was not recorded up to the explored depth.
Table 2.3 – Summary of Boreholes – CWE (2014)

GROUNDWATER
LOCATION DRILLING LEVEL DEPTH
(m) (m)
PD-03 476743 8313404 NE 1.50 10.0
Belt 6: 5841-
CB-110 PD-04 476432 8312041 NE 0.50 10.0
Package 6
PD-05 476570 8312630 NE NE 10.0
Anddes (2016) executed a total of 05 diamond-type boreholes (see Map 993462-5700-G-GF-DWG-

0001) close to the projected area of Belt 5841-CB-110, Belt 5851-CB-110 and Transfer Towers
TT3-6 and TT2-7. Table 2.4 shows the summary of these boreholes, where groundwater table was
not found up to the maximum explored depth.
Table 2.4 – Summary of Boreholes – Anddes (2016)

GROUNDWATER
LOCATION BOREHOLE LEVEL DEPTH
(m) (m)
Fresh Water
PR-SH15-101 476 274 8 311 975 NE 6,10 25,20
Tank
PR-SH15-104 476 388 8 312 132 NE 2,70 31,80
Feed Tank
PR-SH15-105 476 382 8 312 193 NE 0,40 30,05
7
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 8 de 55
Concentrated
ore Thickening
PR-SH15-110 476 350 8 312 278 NE 0,30 30.0
Tank
Concentrated
PR-SH15-120 476266 8312340 NE 0,70 23,40
Mineral
3. GENERAL SITE INFORMATION

3.1 Location
The mining complex of San Juan de Marcona is located in southern Peru, in the region of Ica,
province of Nazca, in the district of Marcona, approximately 530 km south of the city of Lima. The
main access road is the Pan-American Highway that crosses the area diagonally from northeast to
southeast. From km 489 of this main road, a paved branch goes to the mining complex of San Juan
de Marcona and the port of San Juan, which in turn connects with the port of San Nicolás.
Geomorphologically it is included in the Plain of the Coast, conformed by an area of flat relief and by
small hills. Its altimetry of 80 to 400 m asl, presents a warm climate during all the year with
temperatures that oscillate between 14 ° and 28 ° C. During each change of season there are strong
winds called paracas winds. The study area belongs to the San Juan quadrangle 31-m according to
Bulletin A 30, Ingemmet (1978).
3.2 Geology
3.2.1 Regional Geology
3.2.1.1 Regional geomorphology
LOW HILLS
Low hills are formed by very fractured igneous rocks and coastal plains, areas of moderate to gentle
slopes, that inclined uniformly towards the sea. These land elevations have from slightly rounded
to angular peaks, with slopes of around 20% and steeper than 50% facing east.
COASTAL PLAIN
Flat areas of flat to undulated topography where dunes and barcanas are located, there are also
rocks of marine origin, covered by a thin layer of aeolian sands.
MARINE TERRACES
They are materials of rather recent geological period (Quaternary) and are composed of layers of
gravels and boulders within a sandy matrix, sandstone lenses and bioclastic sandstones with
conchiferous horizons and cemented gravel crusts. This material is covering superficially the Pisco
Formation.
3.2.1.2 Regional lithology

Pisco formation
Lithologically, the lower section consists of coarse-grained conglomerate sandstones of yellowish
tones, in broad banks with conchiferous horizons quite crushed by the waves and cemented by
solutions of the same calcareous material. Upwards, fine yellowish sandstones with ferruginous
layers crossed by an intricate system of fibrous gypsum veins, whose propagation is common at
all levels of the formation. It also shows layers of white diatomite, tufts and reworked light and fragile
ashes.
Towards the intermediate portion, there are frequent intercalations of bentonite clay and gray or
white tuff sandstones, with sandstones containing abundant micro and macro fossils.
8
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 9 de 55
Overlaying are the litho stratigraphic units of the Pisco formation, which has wide distribution in the
study area, constituted by rhythmic sequences of sandstones and pelitic facies of diatomites and
bentonites with disordered lenses of crushed molluscs. Overlaying the mentioned formations in
discordance, it presents a broad recent coverage consisting of:
• Aeolian Deposits are distributed as a surficial aeolic layer, formed by poorly graded sand with
silt at depths ranging from 0.2 to 0.5 m.
• Concretions are presented in the form of cemented gravel (caliche) with high content of salts
and evaporites in deposits mostly of sand in depths ranging from 0.3 to 0.4 m. in the Pisco
Formation, which does not involve the study area.
AGE AND CORRELATION:
The age of the Pisco Formation is assigned to the Miocene, based on the fauna founded in the
region studied. The Pisco Formation is equivalent to that one from the Pisco region, to the Zapallal
and Zorritos formations of northeastern Peru.
Paracas formation
The rocks of this unit lie on the metamorphic and intrusive units outcropping in the area, relationship
very well exposed in the high cliffs that make up the coast.
At the base of the Paracas formation, a conglomerate is observed that sometimes has a thickness
of 15m. and that is irregularly distributed along the coast, its clasts are 15 to 25 cm., exceptionally
60 to 80 cm. length, and consist of intrusive, metamorphic and volcanic rocks, in a sandy matrix
many times with calcareous cement, coming from the coquina horizons that usually lie on it. Over
the coquinas, a varied sequence is presented, consisting of argillaceous sandstones, of ocher
yellow color, usually finely stratified, but sometimes, with a marked crossed stratification. These
sandstones are intercalated with thin shales, sandy limestones, and thin limestone horizons, which
have a lenticular tendency. Thin lenticular horizons of gravel that do not reach the meter of
thickness are also intercalated. Towards the middle part, shales predominate, which are subject to
the effects of weathering, breaking up into leaflets. These shales are often calcareous, reaching
marls, in which case they acquire a violet brown color.
Finally, in these levels, there are thin tobaceous horizons and white diatomite, of lenticular nature;
towards the upper part of the sequence the tobaceous intercalations and the white diatomite
horizons become more frequent.
The Paracas Formation correlates with the Pariñas and Verdun formations, outcrops in the
northeast of the country.
Aeolian deposits
In the coastal zone of the studied area, a series of Aeolian deposits are widely distributed. The
oldest, make up extensive layers of sand of little thickness, which do not exceed one meter in the
areas of greatest accumulation. The coarse-grained sands have a dark gray color, due to their high
ferro-magnesian content. These deposits generally have a wavy surface in the form of ripple marks,
whose ridges are separated from 1m to 1.5m, with uneven surfaces up to 20cm; Currently, they
are static or of little mobility, occupying the flat parts or soft depressions that occur in the coastal
zone.
The layers of finer and more clear sand composed mostly of quartz, show greater mobility and
cover equally large areas, invading even the dark sand areas, in which it is often deposited, filling
the depressions left by the curls indicated above. These mantles, when they present a curly surface,
are on a much smaller scale than the previous deposits.
9
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 10 de 55
Marine deposits
On the coast of the study area, recent marine quaternary deposits are exposed. Its distribution is
restricted mainly to areas at the inner ends of the bays, which are favorable for the deposition of
materials.
Eluvial deposits
Under the name are grouped the clastic deposits transported by aqueous means, and
accumulations mainly in the ravines or from the Andean foothills, constituting the broad alluvial
pampas characteristic of the coastal peneplain.
The accumulated deposits at the bottom of the streams consist of thick conglomerates intercalated
with sand, silt and clay, are well exposed in the cuts of the rivers and at the foot of the terraces.
The eluvial deposits have a great distribution in the area, always next to the rock formations that
originated the cones of dejection, as well as the materials of foot of mount and cone of debris, etc.
IGNEOUS ROCKS
Basal Coast Complex:
With this name is designated the group of metamorphic rocks, which in a small proportion and in
isolated form, outcrop in the coastal area of the quadrangles of Pisco, Punta Grande and Ica. The
youngest unit of this complex is probably constituted by tonalitic gneiss, with irregular gneisside
texture, product of a protoclastic deformation, associated to deformation phenomena occurred
during its placement.
This unit is mainly composed of banded gneisses, from pink to greenish gray, whose composition
is varied, being able to grade in some cases migmatites. It is complemented to a lesser extent with
schists, amphibolites and calcite.
The banded gneisses, schists and silicate calcos of the basal coastal complex, exposed in the
coastal area of the department of Ica, are the result of a high-grade regional metamorphism,
suffered by a sedimentary sequence of varied composition, in which predominated shales,
sandstones and few limestones, complementing with some volcanic rocks. This sequence was
crossed by small stocks of intermediate to basic and medium grain composition, which originated
the scarce amphibolite outcrops.
The outcroppings of the basal complex of the coast, from the study area to the South, extend to the
quadrangles of Lomitas, Palpa and San Juan, where their age has been established within the Pre
Cambrian.
Batolito San Nicolás:
Under this name there is a group of intrusive rocks that emerge in the coastal area and that predate
the site of the batholith of the coast. It consists mainly of granites and granodiorites, with some
small isolated bodies of granodiorite.
Normally potassium granites have a wide variety of texture, from granular coarse granules to
porphyritic granules with microcrystalline matrix, passing through all intermediate varieties. The
granodiorites, on the other hand, have a more uniform texture, usually presenting as grain granules
of medium grain, and with the occasional development of a more or less incipient foliation. These
rocks can grade tonalites in extreme cases, but normally, the existence of orthoclase continues,
albeit in scarce proportions.
The intrusive sequence observed in the San Nicolás Batholith is the following: gabbro-diorite,
granodiorite-tonalite, granite, monzogranite.
10
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 11 de 55
3.2.1.3 Regional geo-structural

Regionally, geo-structural control is closely related to the characteristics of igneous and
sedimentary rocks. It developed block failures, and extensional compressions.
The structural control is closely related to the characteristics of the outcropping rocks, product of
the stresses produced during the Tardihercinica phase, where the deformation was reactivated
during the Permian-Triassic developing extensional compressions and block failures, followed by
a deposition as a transition to Andean cycle. The San Nicolás fault system is the result of
compression, where the monzogranite intrusion produced a lift and bow to the sedimentary
formations with fault systems N55 ° O and N30 ° E. This could be observed in the slope of the cliff
of the Bay of San Nicolás showed the presence of a system of tectonic faults of orientation N115 °
/ 60 ° SE, which cut the conglomerádicas sequences of the Pisco Formation.
3.2.2 Local geology

3.2.2.1 Local geomorphology
Locally, geoforms are observed, whose external modeling has involved agents such as climate,
wind and rain, with geoforms associated with the litho stratigraphy.
The main geoforms are:
• Plains: This morphology is characterized by homogeneous zones of insignificant elevations

(pampas). Mainly covered by wind-marine deposits, they are observed in almost all the
extension of the project area.
• Hills or low hills, with slopes of medium to low slope: This unit that is evident in the study area,
corresponds to the slopes formed by residual soils and small outcrops. They are observed at
the east of the project area.
3.2.2.2 Geodynamics
The processes of external geodynamics are related to wind activity, possible tsunamis due to their
proximity to the sea, possibility that exceptional rains will occur, which can slip loose materials. The
risk of vulnerability of the study area is of medium to low level, by contemporary physical-geological
processes, which act in the sphere of influence. The risk in the area of interest would be present in
the contact with the marine deposits (soils with the presence of salts - sulfates), in the course of
time due to the proximity to the sea, can lead to the increase of the presence of salts, generating
corrosion in the bases of the structures.
The greatest geological danger in the area is related to internal geodynamic processes, due to
seismic activity, which is of great magnitude in this region of Peru.
3.2.3 Geomorphological aspects

TRANSFER BELT 5841-CB-110 AND TRANSFER TOWER TT3-6
Part of this conveyor belt will be located on a hill that has a slope with moderate to strong slope.
This slope is currently disturbed by various anthropogenic works, such as cuts, explanations. The
other part will be located on a semi flat plain. This plain is currently also disturbed by various
anthropogenic works.
About 50% of the length of the conveyor belt will be located on a slope with moderate to strong
slope of a hill. This slope is currently disturbed by various anthropogenic works. The rest of the
conveyor belt will be located on a semi-flat plain. This plain is currently disturbed by various civil
works, such as excavations, slope cuts, excavations of ditches.
11
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 12 de 55
3.2.4 Lithostratigraphic aspects

The conveyor belt will be founded in an intrusive igneous rock assigned to the San Nicolás
Batholith, represented by metamorphized monzogranites that can grade to a granite hornbléndico,
these outcropped rocks present a supérgenous weathering. The rock is very fractured, there are
places where the weathering can reach a greater depth. This rock has a thin covering of wind
sands.
The rest of the conveyor belt will continue on clastic sedimentary rocks, such as sandstones,
argillite silts, conglomerates, which are slightly covered by wind sands of medium to fine
granulometry of igneous origin. Below the aeolian sands there is a stratum formed by
conglomerates and shells and evaporite minerals such as halides, carbonates, gypsum, which lie
above the sedimentary rocks.
With regard to the type of materials identified, the following materials have been identified,
corroborated with the investigations carried out such as, test pits and geophysics test.
• Concretions.
• Wind farm.
• Residual soil.
• Alluvial deposit.
• Rocky Basamento.
Concretions
Unit consisting of caliche crusts with high content of salts and evaporites on silty sand deposits with
gravel (SM) and gravel well graded with silt (GW-GM), null plasticity, very dense. These materials
have thicknesses from 0.30 to 0.40 m.
Wind farm.
Unit conformed by sand accumulations in the flat areas and slopes of low slope, are transported by
wind action. Soil composed of poorly graded sand with silt (SP) and silty sand with gravel (SM),
null plasticity, loose to very dense, whitish gray to blackish gray. These materials are distributed in
almost the entire extension of the project area, where thicknesses are from 0.20 to 0.50 m.
Residual soil
Unit coming from the supergene weathering of the existing rocks, and by processes of hydrothermal
alteration of the monzogranite. Soil conformed by gravel well graded with sand (GW), null plasticity,
moderately dense to dense, dry to slightly humid, brownish gray color, homogeneous structure,
angular gravel to sub angular.
Alluvial deposit
Unit formed by accumulations of material transported by water. Soil composed of poorly graded
sand with silt and gravel (SP-SM) and poorly graded gravel with clay (GP-GC), plasticity from null
to medium, medium to dense to very dense, dry, pinkish gray to brownish gray, homogeneous
structure, gravel sub rounded to rounded.
Bedrock
It has been determined the presence of different types of igneous rock that are described below:
• Monzogranite, this type of igneous rock was found in isolated outcrops and in the perforations
made. It is characterized by medium to extremely high resistance, slightly altered to moderately
altered, fractured to very fractured.
12
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 13 de 55
• Andesite, this type of igneous rock was found in isolated outcrops and in perforations made as
minor intrusions (dykes). It is characterized by medium resistance, moderately altered, very
fractured (RQD varies from 20% to 35%).
• Sedimentary rocks have strata consisting of sandstones, siltstones, conglomerates, and have
low resistance.
The conveyor belt will be founded in an intrusive igneous rock assigned to the San Nicolas
Batholith, represented by metamorphosed monzogranites and with supergene weathering. The
rock is very fractured, there are places where the weathering can reach a greater depth. This rock
has a thin covering of wind sands.
The other part of the conveyor belt will continue on clastic sedimentary rocks, such as sandstones,
argillite silts, conglomerates, which are slightly covered by wind sands of medium to fine
granulometry of igneous origin. Below the aeolian sands is a stratum formed by conglomerates and
shells and evaporite minerals such as halides, carbonates, gypsum, which lie above the
sedimentary rocks.
3.2.5 Geo structural aspects

The intrusive and sedimentary rocks are well tectonized, showing strong fracturing and faults. It
was observed to the NE of the conveyor, a wide regional fault, and minor faults. Being the very old
intrusive rock (Pre cambriana - Paleozoic), it has been affected by different tectonic episodes, which
have affected it. No reactivation of these faults has been observed, there is no evidence of recent
tectonic movements (neotectonics), nor recent and / or active deformations, however it cannot be
excluded due to possible movements in the case of high magnitude earthquakes, it is rather
probable, that these failures are activated.
The sedimentary rocks constituted by sandstones, siltstones, conglomerates, are of tertiary
geological period, are folded and failed, but there was also no recent tectonic activity that could
activate these faults.
The intrusive rocks are well tectonized, showing strong fracturing and faults. A wide regional fault
was observed, and minor faults. Being this very old rock (Pre cambriana - Paleozoic), it has been
affected by different episodes that have affected it. No reactivation of these faults has been
appreciated, in case of a very strong earthquake, it is unlikely that these faults will be activated.
3.2.6 Geological Hazards

The intrusive and sedimentary rocks are well tectonized, presenting strong fracturing.
The geological hazards that may affect the belt are:
• Presence of Tsunamis, due to its proximity to the sea.
• Winding products of the wind activity.

• Being part of the conveyor belt in a plain, if there are extraordinary rains, can form lagoons.
The most important geological danger is related to the processes of internal geodynamics, this
being the Seismicity.
3.2.7 Geotechnical considerations

The bedrock is made up of two types of rock, the first consisting of monzogranite, according to the
RMR geotechnical classification, the rock is of medium to bad quality, it is characterized in general
13
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 14 de 55
by presenting medium resistance (R3), moderately altered to slightly altered, very fractured to
fractured, basic RMR 40 (regular rock) and pink to greenish gray color. On the other hand, the
second type of rock is composed of andesite that form dams, is characterized by low to medium
resistance (R2 to R3), moderately altered, very fractured, with a basic RMR 30 to 40 (bad rock).
The degree of fracturing of the rock (RQD), indicates that the Monzogranite gives 50% and the
Andesite gives 22%, which indicates strong fracturing.
The geomechanical value of the rock is low, due mainly to its high fracture degree; on the other
hand, the lack of water and acceptable hardness can be seen as a pro.
Currently, structures such a sub stations, transmission towers, access roads, supports of already
existing conveyor belts have been founded in this rock, thickeners are currently being built on these
rocks, without any foundation problem being detected. This gives us confidence, that in this
intrusive rock is going to be able to cement the strips.
With respect to sedimentary rocks, these are found in the flat parts of the area, they are soft rocks,
they are formed by strata of sandstone rocks, limolithic, they are classified as weak rock.
3.3 Seismicity
Peru is located in one of the regions with the highest seismic activity on Earth, which is the result of
the subduction of the Nazca plate below the South American Plate and the readjustments that occur
in the crust caused by faults and / or existing fractures in the Andean mountain range. In this sense,
the Peruvian territory is divided into four seismic zones defined according to the spatial distribution
of the observed seismicity, the general characteristics of the seismic movements, the attenuation of
these with the epicentral distance and the information of geological and geomorphological processes
existing
According to the seismic zoning map proposed in the Technical Standard E030 "Seismic Design"
(2016), the study area is located in Zone 04, corresponding to a zone factor equal to 0.45. This factor
is expressed as a fraction of the acceleration of gravity and is that maximum horizontal acceleration
in rigid ground with a probability of 10.0% of being exceeded in 50 years.
3.3.1 Seismic History of the Study Region

According to the work of Silgado (1973, 1978 and 1992), he has compiled data on the main seismic
events that occurred in Peru since 1471. This work constitutes a source of elementary information
for the knowledge of the seismic intensities of the historical earthquakes. Alva Hurtado et al. (1984),
based on this source they have elaborated a map of Distribution of Maximum Observed Seismic
Intensities in Peru. The preparation of this map has been based on 30 isosists of Peruvian
earthquakes and data of specific intensities of historical earthquakes and recent earthquakes.
The maximum intensities registered in the study area reach values of up to X on the Modified
Mercalli scale (MMI), this value of seismic intensity reached in the Nazca earthquake on August
24, 1942.
It should be noted that this seismic activity is not totally representative, since important earthquakes
may have occurred in remote regions that were not reported.
Below is a summary description of the earthquakes that have occurred in the area of influence of
the project. This list of earthquakes is based mainly on the work of Silgado and the SISRA Project
(Seismicity of the Andean Region), sponsored by the Regional Center for Seismology for South
America (CERESIS).
• Earthquake of July 9, 1586 at 7:00 pm: Earthquake that destroyed Lima, with 14 to 22
victims. Tsunami in Callao and other places. It was felt from Trujillo to Caravelí, it was also
felt in Huánuco and Cuzco. For 60 days the replicas were felt. Intensities: Lima IX, Ica VI
and Trujillo III.
14
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 15 de 55
• The earthquake of January 6, 1725 at 23:25 hours, which caused various damages in
Trujillo. In the snowy mountains of the Cordillera Blanca, a glacial lake ruptured,
overflowing and devastating a town near Yungay, killing 1,500 people. Intensities of VIII in
Huaura and Barranca, VI in Trujillo and Lima.
• The earthquake of October 28, 1746 with intensity of X in Chancay and Huaura, IX-X in
Lima and VIII in the Cordillera Negra.
• The earthquake of September 2, 1759, which caused five victims in Trujillo and damaged
its buildings. The cathedral suffered damages in its vaults, arcades and towers. Felt along
the Coast between the towns of San Pedro, Lambayeque to Villa de Santa. In the villages
of the Huamachuco mountain range it was intense.
• On August 13, 1868, in Arequipa, there was an earthquake that reached an intensity of XI
on the Modified Mercalli scale, followed by a large Tsunami that devastated much of the
Peruvian coastline. Toribio Polo refers to this earthquake as one of the largest occurred in
Peru since its conquest (Silgado, 1978).
• The earthquake of May 20, 1917 at 23:45. Strong tremor in Trujillo that cracked walls in
public buildings, Archbishop's Palace, the local charity, hospitals, churches, monasteries
and many houses. The movement was strong in Saña, 150 km north of Trujillo, in Chimbote
and Casma.
• Earthquake of August 24, 1942 in Nazca with intensity of IX in the Modified Mercalli Scale
and 8.0Ms.
• The earthquake of May 11, 1948, with magnitude of VII with epicenter in Arequipa, affected
notably Tacna, Moquegua, Puno and surroundings.
• Earthquake of May 28, 1948 with epicenter in Cañete reached intensities of VII in the
Modified Mercalli Scale.
• The earthquake of May 8, 1951 at 3:04 p.m. Regional seismic motion felt between parallels
7 ° and 12 ° south latitude. In the city of Chiclayo he had a grade V on the MM scale.
• The earthquake of January 15, 1958 with the epicenter in Arequipa reached intensities of
VII MMI, also the earthquake of January 13, 1960 with epicenter in the same place, with
intensity of VIII MMI strongly affected the area and surroundings.
• Earthquake of October 17, 1966 at 4:41 pm: It was one of the most destructive occurred in
Lima after the earthquake of 1940. One hundred people killed. It was destructive along the
coastal strip between Lima and Supe. The maximum intensity was estimated in VIII. The
acceleration produced in Lima was 0.3 g. Intensities: VIII in Huacho, Huaura, Chancay,
Puente Piedra and Supe, VII in Lima and Cajatambo, VI in Chimbote, Virú and V in Trujillo.
• Earthquake of May 31, 1970 at 3:23 p.m. It was one of the most catastrophic earthquakes
in Peru with an epicenter on the coast of Chimbote, 50,000 people died, 20,000
disappeared and 150,000 were injured, according to the CRYRSA report. With the
evaluation of damages that this entity made you can have an idea of the catastrophe.
- 60,000 homes need reconstruction.
- 38 towns were affected, 15 houses were destroyed by more than 80%, the rest
suffered considerable damage.
- In 18 cities with a total of 309,000 inhabitants, the sewers were destroyed.
- 6,730 classrooms were destroyed.
15
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 16 de 55
- The electric power capacity of Ancash and La Libertad was reduced to 10%, due to
the series of damages caused at the Huallanca Hydroelectric Plant.
- The facilities to irrigate 110,000 hectares were damaged.
- 77% of the roads of La Libertad and Ancash were interrupted, as well as 40% of those
existing in Chancay and Cajatambo.
- Within the characteristics of the earthquake, it can be mentioned that in the area of
the coast near the epicenter, the liquefaction phenomena, slippage of the slopes of
the mountain range and the great alluvium that devastated the city of Yungay as the
cornice came off north of the Huascarán mountain, dragging stones, snow and mud.
- In the Callejón de Huaylas the landslides and escarpments were many, at the height
of Recuay the Santa river was dammed, in the coastal area the ground cracked with
ejection of water, sand and mud up to a height of 1.0 m.
- The earthquake was felt from Tumbes to Ica and from the coast to Iquitos, producing
intensities of IX (MMI) in Casma and Chimbote, VIII (MMI) in the Callejón de Huaylas,
VII (MMI) in Trujillo, Moche and Paramonga and V a I saw in Ica and Chincha Alta.
• Earthquake of June 10, 1971 at 01:47 am: Deteriorated several old rural houses in Pasco.
Strong sense in Huánuco, Junín, Chincha and Ica. In Lima an intensity of III - IV (MMI) was
estimated. Sense in the departments of Ancash, La Libertad, Amazonas, San Martin and
in Yurimaguas, Orellana, Pucallpa, Contamaná and Iquitos. Intensity V - VI in Cerro de
Pasco and V (MMI) in Huánuco.
• The earthquake of June 23, 2001 with epicenter in Atico, Arequipa reached the maximum
intensity of VII and intensities of V in Ica and III in Lima in the Modified Mercalli Scale.
• On August 15, 2007, an earthquake occurred that originated in the process of plate
convergence, which was termed as "the Pisco earthquake" because its epicenter was
located 60 km west of the city of Pisco. This earthquake had a magnitude of seismic
moment Mw = 7.9 according to the Geophysical Institute of Peru and 8.0 according to the
National Earthquake Center (NEIC). The earthquake caused important damages in a great
number of houses of the city of Pisco (approximately 80%) and smaller in the neighboring
localities, being arrived to evaluate an intensity of the order of VII in the scale of Modified
Mercalli (MM) in the localities of Pisco, Chincha and Cañete, V and VI in the city of Lima. I
saw in the localities of Yauyos (Lima), Huaytará (Huancavelica), IV in the cities of Huaraz
and localities of Canta, Puquio, Chala, III in the cities of Pucallpa and Cusco, and II in the
cities of Arequipa and Chiclayo. This earthquake presents its epicenter and replicas
between the rupture areas of the earthquakes that occurred in Lima in 1974 (7.5 MW) and
Ica in 1996 (7.7 MW). Likewise, this earthquake produced a tsunami that originated in front
of the localities located to the south of the Paracas peninsula, and a generalized
liquefaction in an area of more than 3 km in length in the areas of Canchamaná and Tambo
de Mora in Chincha. The earthquake was located at 13.67º S and 76.76º W and 40 km
deep (Source IGP). The focal mechanism of the Pisco earthquake was of the inverse type
(interphase earthquake), this earthquake and its replicas indicate an area of rupture of
150x100 km elongated in a direction parallel to the coastline (Tavera et al., 2007).
16
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 17 de 55
Zona de
Estudio
Figure 3-1: Map of Maximun Seismic Intensities Observed in el Perú (Alva Hurtado J. E., Meneses J. y Guzmán V.
(1984))
17
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 18 de 55
4. GEOTECHNICAL FIELD INVESTIGATIONS

4.1 General
The fieldwork consisted of excavation of test pits, DPL tests, geophysical tests, sampling of disturbed
samples and geological mapping. Plan 993 462-5700-G-GF-DWG-002 shows the location of the field
investigations carried out. Below, the carried out field work is detailed.
4.2 Pits
The excavation of pits took place from October 16 to 17, 2017 in order to make a direct observation
of the stratigraphic profile of the soil and evaluate its physical and mechanical properties. The
geotechnical research program includes the excavation of eleven (11) test pits made with mechanical
equipment of varying depths (see Table 4.1). The pits were distributed according to the location of
the supporting structures of Belts 5841-CB-110, 5851-CB-110 and structures of the Transfer Towers
TT3-6 and TT2-7, so that it is possible to estimate the stratigraphic profile of the foundation soils.
During the excavation of each pit, a detailed description of the type of soils was made according to
ASTM D2488-75 (Description and Identification of Soils, Visual-Manual Procedure). Furthermore,
altered representative soil samples of the strata identified in each pit were taken, identified and stored
in plastic bags in order to preserve their natural wet and perform laboratory tests.
The description of the soil profile observed in each pit is shown in Annex 2.1. The groundwater table
has not been found up to the excavated depth of each pit. The detailed summary of the pits excavated
by ZER is presented in Table 4.1.
It is important to note that greater depths were not reached due to the presence of the shallow rock
basement and sedimentary material that offered great resistance to mechanical excavation.
Besides, the geotechnical logging of the cut slopes (trenches T-01 and T-02) observed near the
existing transfer towers belonging to each belt under study was carried out. These logs have been
registered as trenches and their description is shown in Annex 2.3.
Table 4.1 – Summary of Pits and Trenches Carried out in this Study

PIT / GROUNDWATER
LOCATION DEPTH DEPTH
TRENCH EAST NORTH LEVEL (m)
(m) (m)
C-01 476419 8312056 NE 1.40 1.40
C-02 476438 8312064 NE 1.30 1.30
C-03 476482 8312243 NE 1.30 1.30
Belt 5841-CB- C-04 476530 8312428 NE 2.60 2.70
110 and
C-05 476550 8312519 NE NE 3.00
Transfer
Tower TT3-6 C-06 476576 8312621 NE NE 1.40
C-07 476666 8313012 NE NE 4.70
C-08 476742 8313324 NE 2.50 3.40
T-01 476784 8313434 NE 0.40 1.90
Belt 5851-CB- C-09 476342 8312361 NE 1.60 1.70
110 and
C-10 476234 8312606 NE 1.80 1.90
Transfer
Tower TT2-7 C-11 476292 8312486 NE 0.90 0.90
T-02 476203 8312618 NE 1.50 4.50
*: Ellipsoid reference WGS84
NE: Not Found
18
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 19 de 55
4.3 DPL test

Fourteen (14) Light Dynamic Penetration tests (DPL) were performed between October 18 and 19,
2017, reaching a maximum depth of 2.60 m. The location and depth of these tests is shown in Table
4.2 and their detailed records are shown in Annex 2.2.
The description of each DPL record obtained from the test is presented below:
Belt 5841-CB-110 DPL-01: It presents a number of hits (NDPL) between 11 and 22 up to 0.60
m depth, which corresponds to a loose material. Then the NDPL
increases to values from 43 to 100 to the maximum depth reached
of 1.0 m, these values correspond to a medium to high density
material.
DPL-02: It presents a NDPL between 23 and 70 up to the 0.60 m maximum
depth corresponding to a loose to medium dense material.
DPL-03: It has a NDPL between 20 and 70 up to 0.50 m depth, which

corresponds to a loose to medium density material. Then there
are values of NDPL between 95 and 100 up to the maximum
depth reached of 0.80 m, these values correspond to a dense
material.
DPL-04: It has a NDPL between 16 and 20 up to 0.40 m depth, which
corresponds to a loose material. Then NDPL values varies from
37 to 100 up to the maximum depth reached of 1.30 m, these
values correspond to a moderately to very dense material.
DPL-05:
It presents NDPL between 3 and 6 up to 0.50 m deep,
corresponding to a very loose material. Next, a material with
NDPL between 40 and 100 was found up to the maximum depth
reached of 0.80 m, these values indicate that it is a moderately to
very dense material.
DPL-06: It presents a number of blows NDPL between 7 and 30 up to 1.50

m deep, whose values correspond to a loose material. Next,
numbers of NDPL blows between 32 and 100 are presented up
to the maximum depth reached of 2.60 m, corresponding to a
moderately dense material.
DPL-07: It has a number of NDPL hits between 30 and 60 up to the
maximum depth reached of 0.40 m, whose values correspond to
a dense material.
DPL-08: It has a number of NDPL hits between 18 and 24 up to 0.50 m
deep, whose values correspond to a loose to medium dense
material. Next, numbers of NDPL hits between 50 and 100 are
presented up to the maximum depth reached of 0.90 m, whose
values correspond to a dense material.
depth, whose values correspond to a residual floor. Then there
are numbers of NDPL hits between 51 and 80 up to the maximum
depth reached of 0.60 m, whose values correspond to a fractured
rock.
19
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 20 de 55
DPL-10: It has a number of NDPL hits between 2 and 6 up to 0.20 m depth,

which corresponds to a residual floor. Then there are numbers of
NDPL hits between 50 and 100 up to the maximum depth reached
of 0.40 m, whose values correspond to a fractured rock.

depth, whose values correspond to a residual floor. Below is
presented NDPL number of hits between 35 and 100 to the
a fractured rock.
depth, whose values correspond to a residual floor. Next,
numbers of NDPL blows between 50 and 70 are presented up to
the maximum depth reached of 0.40 m, whose values correspond
to a fractured rock.
depth, whose values correspond to a residual floor. Then there
are numbers of NDPL hits between 68 and 100 up to the
a fractured rock.
Belt 5851-CB-110 DPL-14: It has a number of NDPL hits between 2 and 15 up to 0.50 m
deep, whose values correspond to a loose material. Then there
are numbers of NDPL hits between 50 and 100 up to the
a fractured rock.
Table 4.2 - Summary of DPL tests Carried out
COORDINATES UTM* TOTAL

LOCATION DPL DEPTH
EAST NORTH (m)
DPL-01 476769 8313441 1.00
DPL-02 476759 8313395 0.60
DPL-03 476746 8313344 0.80
DPL-04 476729 8313269 1.30
DPL-05 476691 8313113 0.80
DPL-06 476633 8312868 2.60
Belt 5841-CB-110 DPL-07 476587 8312683 0.40
DPL-08 476546 8312502 0.90
DPL-09 476468 8312173 0.60
DPL-10 476468 8312187 0.40
DPL-11 476477 8312239 0.50
DPL-12 476495 8312293 0.40
DPL-13 476508 8312344 0.60
Belt 5851-CB-110 DPL-14 476296 8312480 0.70
20
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 21 de 55
4.4 Geophysical tests

The geophysical tests took place from October 15 to 18, 2017 and consisted of thirteen (13) MASW
tests and fourteen (14) seismic refraction lines. The description of each test, the field work and the
interpretation of the results is detailed below:
4.4.1 Theoretical basis of geophysical tests

4.4.1.1 Seismic Refraction Test
The seismic refraction test is a method of geophysical exploration that allows to determine the
stratigraphy of the subsoil in an indirect way, based on the change of the elastic properties of the
materials that make it up. This method consists in the measurement of the travel times of the
compression waves (P waves) and sometimes of the cutting waves (S waves) generated by a
source of impulsive energy at points located at predetermined distances along a axis on the ground
surface, see Figure 4-1.
DIRECTA
A DA
L EJ
R EF
ic
ic
i r
V1
REFRACTADA V2
Figure 4-1: Seismic waves refracted
The energy that propagates in the form of waves is detected, amplified and recorded in such a way
that its time of arrival at each point can be determined. The zero time or start of the recording is
generated by a trigger device that activates the data acquisition system when the impact or
explosion occurs. The difference between the time of arrival and the time zero allows to evaluate
the propagation time of the waves from the energy source to the place where they are registered.
A diagram of the test is shown in Figure 4-2.
Figure 4-2: Schematic of seismic refraction test
The data consists of travel times and distances, being the travel time the interval between time zero
and the instant in which the detector begins to respond to the disturbance. This time-distance
information (dromochronic) is processed to obtain an interpretation in the form of wave propagation
velocities and the structure of the subsoil layers, as shown in Figure 4-3.
21
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 22 de 55
Figure 4-1: (a) Simple example of two layers with plane limited plans and parallels (b) dromochronic of the
seismic refraction
4.4.1.2 MASW test
The MASW or Surface Wave Analysis in Multichannel Array is a method that consists of the
interpretation of the surface waves (Rayleigh waves) of a register in a multichannel arrangement,
generated by a source of impulsive energy in points located at predetermined distances along of
an axis on the surface of the land, obtaining the one-dimensional profile of shear wave velocities
(Vs) for the center point. The MASW method allows to obtain S wave profiles up to average depths
of 30.00 m.
In this method, the interpretation of the records consists of obtaining from them a scatter curve, as
shown by the graph of the phase velocity (c) versus the frequency (f), according to Figure (a). Then,
the cutoff wave velocity profile (Vs) is calculated using an iterative process that requires the non-
linear inversion of the scatter curve data. The MASW method estimates that from the dispersion
curve, the cutting wave velocity profile (Vs) of the terrain is constructed by a simple transformation.
This transformation estimates that the wavelength (λ) is calculated from the frequency (f) and the
phase velocity (c), based on Equation 1, according to Figure (b). Next, the depth (D) is defined as
1/3 of the value of the wavelength, and the cutting wave velocity (Vs) at that depth is b times the
measured phase velocity c, where b is a coefficient which changes depending on the frequency
and is based on a homogeneous semi-space. Consequently, according to Hayashi (2008), Figure
4 (b) is presented, which represents the relationship between the Cut Wave Velocity (m/s) and
Depth (m).
λ = c/f (Equation 1)
D = λ/3 (Equation 2)
Vs = b*c (donde b varía de 1.05 a 1.11) (Equation 3)
Donde:
λ : Wavelength
c : Phase speed
f : Frequency
D : Depth
Vs : Wave speed S
It is important to note that the shape of the dispersion curve is strongly related to the variation of
rigidity with depth. Therefore, the MASW method has the ability to identify more rigid strata lying
on soft strata.
22
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 23 de 55
Velocidad de Fase (c)
(a)
Frecuencia (f)
Velocidad de la onda S (Vs)
(b)
Profundidad (D)
Figure 4-4: Initial model based on a 1/3 of the wavelength transformation
This technique has been used quite frequently in the geotechnical exploration for the foundation of
different types of structures, such as bridges and machines, earth dams, tailings dams and leach
pads, among others, thus obtaining good correlations with the profiles stratigraphic of the soil in
cases where drilling has been carried out, as well as with the results of the standard penetration
tests (SPT), for which it has a good reliability and constitutes a very economical alternative for the
evaluation of the elastic parameters of the soil of foundation.
4.4.2 Description of field geophysical tests

The geophysical tests consisted of one (01) MASW line of 53.0 m in length and 3.0 m of spacing
between geophones, twelve (12) MASW lines of 58.5 m in length and 1.5 m of spacing between
geophones, eleven (11) lines of refraction seismic of 72.0 m in length and 3.0 m of spacing between
geophones and three (03) seismic refraction lines of 96.0 m in length and 4.0 m of spacing between
geophones. The spacing between geophones is defined according to the required depth of
exploration. The equipment used has 24 geophones and a maximum cable length of 240.0 m.
In the seismic refraction and MASW tests, the source of energy used to generate the seismic waves
consisted to blow of a hammer of 25.0 lb under metallic plate. This condition is necessary to obtain
an acceptable sharpness in the wave record that allows an adequate processing.
For the execution of the refraction lines and the MASW tests, the axes of the seismic line were
initially defined and then the geophones and connection cables to the data acquisition equipment
were installed. The location of these tests coincides with nearby areas where some pits were
excavated in order to complement these studies and know the elastic properties of the foundation
soil.
On the other hand, the seismic refraction lines allowed us to investigate soil profiles between 20
and 30 m deep. These trials are complemented by the MASW Trials to identify soil strata with
similar elastic properties. These tests allowed to reach depths of investigation of 30.0 m.
4.4.3 Results and interpretation of results

4.4.3.1 Seismic Refraction
From the records of seismic waves obtained in the refraction lines the dichrochronic curves were
determined (Time - Distance) and from said information the interpretation of the seismic profiles
23
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 24 de 55
was made which are shown in the sheets LS-001, LS-002 , LS-003, LS-004, LS-005, LS-006, LS-
007, LS-008, LS-009, LS-010, LS-011, LS-012, LS-013 and LS-014 of the Annex 1.1.1.
Table 4.3 presents the summary of the locations of the seismic refraction lines executed in the field
and Table 4.4 details the description of each seismic profile.
Table 4.3 - Summary of the location Seismic Refraction lines
COORDINATES UTM LENGTH WAVE

LOCATION TEST
REFERENCE EAST NORTH (m) TYPE
Inicio 476432 8312036
LS-01 72.0 Waves P
Fin 476452 8312105
Inicio 476431 8312213
LS-02 72.0 Waves P
Fin 476492 8312175
Inicio 476477 8312341
LS-03 72.0 Waves P
Fin 476528 8312291
Inicio 476524 8312407
LS-04 96.0 Waves P
Fin 476548 8312500
Belt 5841-CB- Inicio 476566 8312587
LS-05 96.0 Waves P
110 and Fin 476588 8312680
Transfer Inicio 476620 8312803
Tower TT3-6 LS-06 72.0 Waves P
Fin 476635 8312874
Inicio 476682 8313083
LS-07 96.0 Waves P
Fin 476705 8313177
Inicio 476719 8313224
LS-08 72.0 Waves P
Fin 476731 8313295
Inicio 476721 83133701
LS-09 72.0 Waves P
Fin 4767871 8313397
Inicio 476777 8313437
LS-10 72.0 Waves P
Fin 476814 8313498
Inicio 476334 8312392
LS-01’ 72.0 Waves P
Fin 476365 8312327
Belt 5851-CB- Inicio 476222 8312576
110 and Fin 476294 8312576
Transfer Inicio 476212 8312609
Tower TT2-7 LS-03’ 72.0 Waves P
Fin 476284 8312610
Inicio 476263 8312679
Fin 476210 8312631
Table 4.4 - Summary of the description of the results seismic refraction tests
THICKNESS
LOCATION TEST STRATUM Vp(M / s) DESCRIPTION
(m)
1 1200 - 2000 2.6 - 4.8 Fractured rock
LS-01
Belt 5841- 2 2000 - 2200 19.5 - 21.3 Slightly Fractured rock to Intact
CB-110 and 1 1000 - 2000 2.3 - 2.9 Fractured rock
Transfer LS-02
Tower TT3- 2 2000 - 2400 21.0 - 21.6 Slightly Fractured rock to Intact
6 1 1200 - 2000 0.8 - 1.3 Fractured rock
LS-03
2 2000 - 3400 22.6 - 23.1 Slightly Fractured rock to Intact
24
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 25 de 55
THICKNESS
LOCATION TEST STRATUM Vp(M / s) DESCRIPTION
(m)
Medium consistency materials or
1 700-900 1.6 - 5.8
moderately dense compactness
LS-04
Materials firm consistency or
2 > 900 27.0 - 30.3
compactness dense / Soft Rock
1 800-900 0 to 0.4
Materials average consistency of
LS-05 medium density or compactness
2 900 - 1200 31.5 - 32.0
1 600-900 1.5 - 9.8
LS-06
2 900 - 1200 14.1 - 22.5
1 500-700 0 - 4.8
LS-07
2 > 700 25.1 - 30.0
1 500-800 11.9 - 12.7
LS-08
2 > 800 11.2 - 12.0
1 600-900 4.0 - 5.1
LS-09
2 > 900 18.8 - 19.9
1 400-900 4.2 - 5.0
LS-10
2 900 - 1100 18.9 - 19.7
1 400 - 2000 1.8 - 15.8 Very dense soil / Fractured Rock
LS-01 '
2 2000 - 2200 8.1 - 22.1 Intact slightly fractured rock
1 600 - 1000 2.1 - 2.2
LS-02 '
Belt 5851- 2 1000 - 1600 21.3 - 21.4
CB-110 and
Transfer Medium consistency materials or
1 600 - 1000 1.6 - 1.8
Tower TT2- moderately dense compactness
LS-03 '
7 Materials firm consistency or
2 1000 - 1400 22.2 - 22.3
1 400 - 1000 2.8 - 3.4
LS-04 '
2 1000 - 1200 20.5 - 21.1
25
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 26 de 55
4.4.3.2 MASW probes

From the seismic wave records of the MASW drillings, the curves of the dispersion curves were
determined and from that information the interpretation of the one-dimensional cut wave models
was made, which are shown in Annex 1.2.1. For the classification of the profiles, the cutting wave
velocities (Vs) were compared with the ranges indicated in the E.030 Standard "Seismic Resistant
Design".
Table 4.5 presents the summary of the locations of the drillings executed in the field and Table 4.6
details the description of each seismic profile.
Table 4.5 - Summary of the location MASW test
COORDINATES UTM LENGTH WAVE

LOCATION TEST
REFERENCE EAST NORTH (m) TYPE
MASW-01 Middle 476436 8312060 53.0 Wave S
Belt 5841-CB- MASW-04 Middle 476535 8312454 58.5 Wave S
110 and
Transfer
Tower TT3-6 MASW-06 Middle 476656 8312945 58.5 Wave S
MASW-01’ Middle 476350 8312360 58.5 Wave S
Belt 5851-CB-
110 and MASW-02’ Middle 476306 8312447 58.5 Wave S
Transfer MASW-03’ Middle 476259 8312575 58.5 Wave S
Tower TT2-7
MASW-04’ Middle 476237 8312651 58.5 Wave S
Table 4.6 - Summary of the description of the results MASW tests
THICKNESS
LOCATION TEST STRATUM vs(M / s) DESCRIPTION
(m)
1 995 - 1065 5.2 fractured rock
MASW-01
2 305-485 24.8 Intact slightly fractured rock
1 955 - 1100 5.2 fractured rock
MASW-02
2 1155 - 1370 24.8 Intact slightly fractured rock
1 1295 - 1455 3.7 Intact slightly fractured rock
MASW-03
Belt 5841- 2 1530 - 1690 26.3 rock Sana
CB-110 and
Transfer Medium consistency materials or
1 400-450 3.7
Tower TT3- moderately dense compactness
MASW-04
6 Materials firm consistency or
2 470-640 26.3
1 385-765 8.9
MASW-05 Materials very firm consistency or
2 830 - 1000 21.1 compactness dense / Rock slightly
fractured
26
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 27 de 55
THICKNESS
LOCATION TEST STRATUM vs(M / s) DESCRIPTION
(m)
1 320-350 15.5
MASW-06
2 385-425 14.5
1 226-340 15.5
MASW-07
2 375-445 14.5
1 300-355 8.9
MASW-08
2 375-480 21.1
1 250-360 7.0
MASW-09
2 390-580 23.0
MASW-01 1 670-785 5.2 Very dense soil / Fractured Rock
' 2 915 - 1455 24.8 Intact slightly fractured rock
MASW-02 1 910 - 1015 3.7 fractured rock
' 2 1175 - 1475 26.3 Intact slightly fractured rock
Belt 5851-
CB-110 and Medium consistency materials or
1 475-515 3.7
Transfer MASW-03 moderately dense compactness
Tower TT2- ' Materials firm consistency or
7 2 515-815 26.3
1 240-385 5.2
MASW-04 moderately dense compactness
' Materials firm consistency or
2 425-580 24.8
4.5 Seismic considerations

From the one-dimensional profiles of shear waves obtained from the geophysical tests, the average
speed of shear waves for the first 30.0m of depth of the soil (Vs30) has been calculated with the
purpose of determining the type of seismic profile to which corresponds .
According to the Technical Standard E.030 "Seismic Design" (2016), the cutting wave velocities
obtained have been compared with the characteristic speed ranges of each soil profile in order to
define the site conditions. Based on this, Table 4-1 shows the average cutting wave velocities in the
first 30.0m depth of the terrain (Vs30) obtained from the MASW drillings. Likewise, the classification
of the soil profile is included according to the current regulations.
• Factor de zona (Z) : 0.45 (Zona 04, ver apartado 2.2 de la Norma E.030)
Therefore, for the structural evaluation of the structure, according to the Technical Standard E.030
"Seismic Design" (2016), considering the location of the project and the classification of the type of
soil, the following parameters are available:
27
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 28 de 55
Chart 4-1- Classification of obtained soil profiles and Site Parameters
Vs30 Profile of Ground Soil Predominant Predominant

TEST
(m/seg) (E030, 2016) Factor (S) period (Tp) period (TL)
S0
MASW 03 1594
(Roca Dura)
MASW 01 1342
MASW 02 1225
MASW 04 542 S1 1.00 0.4 seg 2.5 seg
MASW 05 772 (Roca o Suelos
MASW 01’ 1124 muy Rígidos)
MASW 02’ 1304
MASW 03’ 663
MASW 06 361
MASW 07 330
S2
MASW 08 392 (Suelos 1.05 0.6 seg 2.0 seg
Intermedios)
MASW 09 428
MASW 04’ 466
4.6 Geomechanical stations

As part of the geological mapping carried out, geomechanical stations were carried out with the
objective of properly characterizing the rock mass. The stations evaluate parameters of the rock that
can be obtained in situ such as resistance, weathering, spacing, continuity, opening, roughness,
filling characteristics and presence of water.
The geomechanical stations realized in the superficial rocky outcrops identified in the mapping are
shown in Map 993 462-5700-G-GF-DWG-002. The summary of the location of these is shown in
Table 4.7 and their records, which include part of the processing corresponding to the calculation of
the RMR and the families of identified boards, are presented in Annex 2.4.
Table 4.7 - Summary of Geomechanical Stations
COORDINATES UTM*
LOCATION STATION
EAST NORTH
EG-01 476444 8312104
Faja 5841-CB-110 y EG-02 476466 8312155

TT3-6 EG-03 476480 8312196
EG-04 476813 8313483
Faja 5851-CB-110 y
EG-05 476213 8312621
TT2-7
4.7 Water Level

According to the field work carried out on the dates indicated, the presence of the Water Level has
not been recorded in any of the pits and tests carried out by ZER and also in the drilling carried out
by CWE (2014) and Anddes (2016).
28
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 29 de 55
As a conclusion, it can be affirmed that there is no evidence of surface presence of water table level
for the study area up to the maximum depth investigated of 10 m in the perforations made by CWE
(2014).
5. LABORATORY TESTS
The laboratory tests of the samples of soil and rock extracted were made in the Geotechnical
Laboratory of GEOFRONTIER PERU S.A.C, LABORATORIOS LASA INGENIEROS S.A. and
LABORATORIO DE MECÁNICA DE ROCAS DE LA FIGMM UNI in order to classify soil and rock
samples, determine their physical and mechanical properties and the concentration of harmful
chemical substances. The laboratory tests were conducted according to the standards of the
American Society for Testing and Material (ASTM), the American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials (AASHTO) and the Material Testing Manual of the Ministry of Transportation
and Communications (MTC), which are mentioned below:
• 07 Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils ASTM D422

• 07 Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and
ASTM D4318
Plasticity Index of Soils
• 07 Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of

ASTM D2216
Water (moisture) Content of Soil and Rock by Mass
• 04 Standard Test Method for Direct Shear Test of Soils Under
ASTM D3080
Consolidated Drained Conditions
• 01 Standar Test Method for Unconsolidated-Undrained Triaxial
ASTM D2850
Compression Test on Cohesive Soils
• 04 Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of
ASTM D7263
Density (Unit Weight) of Soils
• 04 Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength
ASTM D2938
of Intact Rock Core Specimens
• 02 Standard Test Method for Determination of the Point Load
Strength Index of Rock and Application to Rock Strength ASTM D5731
Classifications
• 05 Standard Test Methods for Absorption and Bulk Specific ASTM C97-02
Gravity of Dimension Stone
• 09 Water Soluble Chloride Content in Soil AASHTO T291
• 09 Water Soluble Sulfate Content in Soil AASHTO T290
• 09 Sales Soluble Content in Soil MTC E 219
• 03 Standard Test Method for pH of Soils ASTM D4972
The reports of the laboratory results of each trial are presented in Annex 3.0 and the corresponding
summary is shown in the document Tables.
6. GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF THE FOUNDATION

6.1 Foundation Material
According to the records of the geotechnical investigations carried out in the field and the results of
the laboratory tests of soil and rock mechanics, the geotechnical characterization of the materials
that will form the foundation stratum was carried out and for this purpose three types of foundation
materials for the total location of the structures that make up Belts 5841-CB-110, 5851-CB-110,
Transfer Towers TT3-6, TT2-7 and Sub Electric Station 5840-ER-100.
29
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 30 de 55
• Foundation Material I (MC-1) .- Intrusive igneous rock - Monzogranite: igneous rock of coarse
to fine texture, pink to greenish gray, strongly fractured with the presence of andesitic dikes. This
rock is generally characterized by medium resistance (R3) and basic RMR 40 (regular rock).
• Foundation Material II (MC-2) .- Sedimentary Clásica Rock - Sandstone, Limoarcillite: It consists
classifications of low plasticity sandy loam (ML), low plasticity sand loam (ML) and clay loam sand
(SC-SM).
• Foundation Material III (MC-3) .- Silty sandy gravels and gravel, calichosas, hard sands: Thick
conglomerate interspersed with sand, silt and clay that is covered superficially by wind sands of
medium to fine granulometry of igneous origin, cemented by solutions of calcareous material and
whose thickness can reach up to 15 m. It presents SUCS classifications of poorly graded sand
with silt (SP-SM), poorly graded gravel (GP) and poorly graded gravel with silt (GP-GM).
In Plano 993 462-5700-G-GF-DWG-003 the distribution of these foundation materials defined for the
present project can be observed.
6.2 Type of Foundations

According to the information provided by SHP, the structures that make up Belts 5841-CB-110 and
5851-CB-110 will be located by means of insulated footings, which will be based on the three types
of foundation materials indicated in chapter 6.1. The transfer towers TT3-6 and TT2-7 as well as the
sub-station 5840-ER-100 will be emplaced by means of foundation pavements, which will be
cemented necessarily on igneous monzogranite rock.
Table 6-1 shows the type of foundation for each structure that make up the present study. In addition,
it indicates the support number and the material on which said support will be placed for each of the
aforementioned belts.
Chart 6-1- Material and Type of Foundations for each Structure

BELT / FOUNDATION TYPE OF
SUPPORT
STRUCTURE MATERIAL FOUNDATION

From 144 to 153
Monzogranite
Sedimentary Clastic
From 11 to 100 and
Belt 5841-CB- Rock - Sandstone,
from 140 to 143 Footing
110 Limoarcillites
Silty sandy gravels and
From 101 to 139 gravelly sands, hard
cemented gravel

From 0 to 7
Monzogranite
Belt 5851-CB-
Sedimentary Clastic Footing
110
From 8 to 14 Rock - Sandstone,
Limoarcillites
-
TT3-6 Monzogranite
Slabs
-
TT2-7 Monzogranite
30
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 31 de 55
BELT / FOUNDATION TYPE OF

SUPPORT
STRUCTURE MATERIAL FOUNDATION
Electrical
Substation -
Monzogranite
5840-ER-100
Based on this, the admissible load capacity of the different foundation materials will be determined
through the methodology described by Meyerhof (1963) in the case of foundations on the ground,
while the admissible load capacity in rock will be estimated using the methodology of Busimam-
Terzaghi (Terzaghi 1943). The theory of elasticity was used to calculate settlements in soils and
rocks (Lambe and Whitman, 1969).
6.3 Depth of Foundations

The foundation levels for the structures that make up the project are proposed from the natural level
of the land and are projected on the three types of foundation materials. The foundation depths of
the footings and foundation pits varies between 1.50 to 3.50 m and in table 6-2 the minimum required
slants for each structure according to the foundation material are indicated.
Chart 6-2- Depth of exhaustion

BELT / FOUNDATION TYPE OF Df (m)
SUPPORT
STRUCTURE MATERIAL FOUNDATION mín.
From 144 to 153 MC-1 1.50
From 11 to 100 and

Belt 5841-CB-
from 140 to 143
MC-2
Footing
2.00
110
From 101 to 139 MC-3 2.00
From 0 to 7 MC-1 1.50

Belt 5851-CB-
Footing
110
From 8 to 14 MC-2 2.00
Transfer Tower
- MC-1 1.50
TT3-6
Transfer Tower
TT2-7
- MC-1
Slabs
1.50
Electrical
Substation - MC-1 1.50
5840-ER-100
• Foundation Material I (MC-1):

Considering that field geotechnical investigations have observed fillings that could not be
controlled, it is established that if the builder considers maintaining the foundations levels at higher
levels initially projected, he should consider the use of fluid fillings with resistance Fc 'greater or
equal to the allowable load capacity indicated in Table 6-5.
31
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 32 de 55
• Foundation Material II (MC-2) and Foundation Material III (MC-3):

If loose material is found with the presence of shells and marine debris in a large proportion during
the excavation of the foundation to its level of drag, this material should be removed and the
foundations deepened by false footings until reaching the competent stratum considered as
foundation material .
After this cleaning if the builder considers maintaining the foundations levels at higher levels
initially projected, he should consider the use of controlled fillings from solid type materials up to
fluid fillings with resistance Fc 'greater than or equal to the admissible load capacity indicated in
the Tables 6-6 and 6-7.
The admissible capacity of the different foundation materials for various depths has been evaluated
in order to provide a range of values that allow knowing the variation of bearing capacity for the
different projected structures and thus allow a decision making consistent with the conditions of
operation of the project.
6.4 Elastic Parameters

By means of the analysis and interpretation of the results obtained from the geophysical tests, the P
and S wave velocities were determined, which allowed generating seismic profiles and estimating
the density of each stratum of material taking as reference characteristic values; Subsequently, the
elastic parameters of the different foundation materials were calculated. The speeds P and S
correspond to average velocities of each seismic stratum; therefore, the average speeds of the tests
LS-01 - MASW-02, LS-04 - MASW-04 and LS-10 - MASW-09 were used in the analysis. Tables 6.1,
6.2 and 6.3 present the results of the calculation of the elastic parameters obtained for each
foundation material through the application of empirical correlations of the current technical literature.
Table 6.1 – Elastic Parameters - LS-01 - MASW-02
Vs Vp р μ Gmáx Emáx E=0.3*Emáx E=0.3*Emáx

Prof.
Foundation Material Vp/Vs
(m)
(m/s) (m/s) (t/m3) (Poisson) (t/m2) (t/m2) (t/m2) (GPa)
Intrusive igneous 0.0 -

1000 1750 2.60 1.75 0.26 265035.68 666604.89 199981 2.00
rock - Monzogranite 5.00
Table 6.2 – Elastic Parameters - LS-04 - MASW-04
Vs Vp р μ Gmáx Emáx E=0.1*Emáx

Foundation Material Prof. (m) Vp/Vs
(m/s) (m/s) (t/m3) (Poisson) (t/m2) (t/m2) (t/m2)
Silty sandy gravel and Sandy

0.0 - 5.00 438 800 1.90 1.83 0.29 37156.33 95563.33 9556.33
gravel.
Tabla 6.3 – Elastic Parameters - LS-10 - MASW-09
Foundation Prof. Vs Vp р μ Gmáx Emáx E=0.2*Emáx E=0.2*Emáx

Vp/Vs
Material (m)
(m/s) (m/s) (t/m3) (Poisson) (t/m2) (t/m2) (t/m2) (MPa)
Clastic
sedimentary rock- 0 - 7.0 300 720 2.10 2.40 0.39 19266.06 53750.67 10750.13 107.50
Sandstone
32
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 33 de 55
6.5 Geotechnical Parameters

Table 6.4 presents the summary of the shear strength properties of the three types of foundation
materials involved in the analysis of allowable load capacity and calculation of elastic settlements.
These geotechnical parameters apply to the design of foundations of all the structures that make up
the project.
Table 6.4 – Summary of strength parameters of foundation materials
Specific Internal Young
Cohesion "c" Poisson
Foundation Material weight Friction Module "E"
(Mpa) ""
(g/cm3) Angle (θ) (Mpa)

2.6 32.0 0.1 2000.0 0.30
Monzogranite
Clastic sedimentary rock-
2.1 30.0 0.0 107.5 0.39
Sandstone
Silty sandy gravel and Sandy
1.9 35.0 0.0 96.0 0.29
gravel.
6.6 Methodologies for the calculation of admissible load capacity

6.6.1 Buisman-Terzaghi (Terzaghi 1943)
The Rock Foundation Engineering and Design Manual of the Army Corps of Engineers of the United
States of America (USACE, 1994) proposes to select a potential mode of failure for the estimation
of the load capacity of a rock surface foundation. For this, the characteristics of the rock mass must
be known, such as the dip of the discontinuities with respect to the width of the foundation (B).
There are three potential modes of failure which are mentioned below:
a. Falla General por Corte

b. Falla General por Corte sin Cohesión
c. Falla Local por Corte
The ultimate load capacity in rocks will be determined based on the Buisman-Terzaghi formula
(Terzaghi 1943). This equation considers a general cut failure applied to intact rocks. The equation
is valid for foundations with an L / B ratio of less than ten. (L is the largest length of the foundation).
𝑞𝑢 = 𝑐𝑁𝑐𝐶𝑐 + 0.5𝛾2𝐵𝑁𝛾𝐶𝛾 + 𝛾1𝐷𝑓𝑁𝑞 (Para L/B<10)
Donde:
c : Cohesion of rock
Df : Depth of fundation
γ1 : Specific gravity over the foundation depth
γ2 : Specific gravity under the foundation depth
B : Width of foundation
N c , N q , N
: Load capacity factors
C , Cc
: Correction Factors (shape)
N c  2 N ( N  1)
N  N ( N 2  1)
33
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 34 de 55
N q  N 2
 
N  tan 2  45  
 2
Table 6-3- Correction Factors (shape)
For rectangular foundations with different L/B ratios, correction factors can be determined by linear
interpolation.
Under the condition of eccentric loads, reduced dimensions of the foundation will be used. The
effective width and length of the foundation is defined as:
Figure 6-1: Reduced dimensions for a rectangular shallow foundation
𝐵´ = 𝐵 − 2𝑒𝑏
𝐿´ = 𝐿 − 2𝑒𝑙
Where:
B´ y L´ : Width and length
e : Parallel eccentricity of both dimensions
The admissible load capacity of the foundation will be determined according to:
qult
qadm 
F .S .
Where:
34
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 35 de 55
F.S. : Security Factor, FS=3.0
6.6.2 Meyerhof (1963)

One of the first methodologies for calculating surface foundations was proposed by Terzaghi
(1943). His proposal arose from certain modifications made to the original proposal of Prandtl
(1920) that was based on the theory of plasticity.
The load capacity of a homogeneous soil to which a vertical load is applied through a shoe on the
surface, can be estimated relatively easily by the conventional theory of Terzaghi (1943), which
assumes the following:
• The soil is homogeneous, isotropic, rigid plastic and continuous.

• The relation between the depth of foundation (Df) and the width of the foundation (B) is small.
• During the loading process, a General Cut Failure occurs in the foundation.
• The angle θ in the wedge is the ground friction angle (φ). Then, Vesic (1943) showed that
this angle is θ = 45 + φ / 2.
• The cut resistance of the soil located above the foundation level is not considered.
Subsequently, Meyerhof (1951) considered the resistance of this area.
• The soil above the foundation foundation level can be replaced by the effort (ɣDf).
Figure 6-2: Assumed fault surface by Terzaghi (Budhu, 2010).
Based on the considerations, Terzaghi (1943) proposed the following formula for assessing the
ultimate load capacity of foundations run.
1
qu  cN c   1 D f N q   2 BN 
2
Where:
c: Cohesion
Df
: Depth foundation
 1 : Specific gravity over the foundation depth
 2 : Specific gravity under the foundation depth

B: Width of foundation
35
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 36 de 55
N c , N q , N  : Load capacity factors

To estimate the ultimate load capacity of square shallow foundations, the past equation is modified
to:
qu  1.3cN c   1D f N q  0.4 2 BN 
The load capacity factors for the Terzaghi equation have their own expressions. This methodology
was reviewed by Meyerhof (1963), who proposed a general equation for the calculation of the
ultimate load capacity.
Finally, the ultimate load capacity in soils will be determined based on the General Load Capacity
Equation proposed by Meyerhof (1963), whose expression is as follows:
1
qult  cN c Fcs Fcd Fci  ( D f  1 ) N q Fqs Fqd Fqi   2 BN  Fs Fd Fi
2
Where:
c: Cohesion
Df
: Depth of foundation
 1 : Specific gravity over the foundation depth
 2 : Specific gravity under the foundation depth

B: Width of foundation
Fcs , Fqs , Fs

: Shape factors
Fcd , Fqd , Fd

: Depth factors
Fci , Fqi , Fi

: Load inclination factors
N c , N q , N
: Load capacity factors
The calculation of the coefficients that are part of the indicated equation is shown in the following
Table 6-4:
Table 6-4- Load capacity, inclinations, depth and shape factors
FACTORS EQUATIONS REFERENCE
 
N q  tan 2  45  e tan  Reissner (1924)
 2
N c  N q  1cot  Prandtl (1921)
Load capacity
Caquot y Kerisel (1953) y
N   2N q  1tan  Vesic (1973)
Beer (1970), Hansen

B Nq
Shape Fcs  1  (1970))
L Nc
36
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 37 de 55
FACTORS EQUATIONS REFERENCE
B
Fqs  1  tan 
L
B
Fs  1  0.4
L
Condition (a): Df/B ≤ 1 Para   0:
Df
Fcd  1 0.4
B
Fqd  1 Fd  1.0
For   0:
1  Fqd
Fcd  Fqd 
N c tan 
Df
Fqd  1  2 tan  (1  seno ) 2
B
Fd  1.0
Depth
Condition (b): Df/B > 1 Meyerhof
Para   0:
 Df 
Fcd  1  0.4 tan 1  
 B 
Fqd  1 Fd  1.0

For   0:
1  Fqd
Fcd  Fqd 
N c tan 
Df
Fqd  1  2 tan  (1  seno ) 2
B
Fd  1.0
2
 º 
Fci  Fqi  1  º 
 90 
Beer (1970), Hansen
2
Inclinación   (1970)
Fi  1  
 
Where β = load inclination (referred to
the vertical)
The admissible load capacity of the foundation floor will be determined according to:
37
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 38 de 55
qult
qadm 
F .S .
Where:
F.S. : Security Factor, FS=3.0
The parameters of shear resistance will be reduced considering a local failure effect. This reduction
of the parameters will be given by the formulations described in the AASHTO LRFD 2013 standard
which indicates the following expressions:
𝑐 ∗= 0.67𝑐
ɸ ∗= tan−1 (0.67𝑡𝑎𝑛ɸ𝑓 )
Where:
𝑐 ∗: Reduced effective effort of cohesion considering local failure
ɸ ∗: Reduced effective effort of friction angle considering local failure
The E-050 Suelos y Cimentaciones recommends using cohesion values equal to zero in granular
soils and values of internal friction angle equal to zero in cohesive soils.
38
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 39 de 55
6.7 Admissible Load Capacity Results

6.7.1 Belt 5841-CB-110 and 5851-CB-110 – Footing
SUPPORTS: From 144 to 153 (Belt 5841) and From 0 to 7 (Belt 5851)
Chart 6-5- Permissible load capacity for insulated footing

MATERIAL: Roca Ignea Intrusiva - Monzogranito
ADMISSIBLE BEARING CAPACITY (kg/cm2)
DIMENSIONS OF FOOTING FOUNDATION BASE LEVEL, Df (m)
WIDTH B (m) LONG: L (m) 1.50 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.50 2.80 3.00
0.60 0.60 9.43 9.71 9.89 10.08 10.35 10.63 10.81
0.80 0.80 9.56 9.84 10.02 10.21 10.48 10.76 10.94
1.00 1.00 9.69 9.97 10.15 10.33 10.61 10.88 11.07
1.20 1.20 9.82 10.09 10.28 10.46 10.74 11.01 11.19
1.50 1.50 10.01 10.28 10.47 10.65 10.93 11.20 11.39
2.00 2.00 10.33 10.60 10.79 10.97 11.25 11.52 11.70
2.50 2.50 10.65 10.92 11.10 11.29 11.56 11.84 12.02
3.00 3.00 10.96 11.24 11.42 11.61 11.88 12.16 12.34
0.60 0.72 9.28 9.56 9.74 9.92 10.20 10.47 10.66
0.80 0.96 9.41 9.68 9.87 10.05 10.33 10.60 10.79
1.00 1.20 9.54 9.81 10.00 10.18 10.46 10.73 10.91
1.20 1.44 9.67 9.94 10.13 10.31 10.58 10.86 11.04
1.50 1.80 9.86 10.14 10.32 10.50 10.78 11.05 11.24
2.00 2.40 10.18 10.46 10.64 10.83 11.10 11.38 11.56
2.50 3.00 10.51 10.78 10.96 11.15 11.42 11.70 11.88
3.00 3.60 10.83 11.10 11.29 11.47 11.75 12.02 12.20
0.60 0.84 9.12 9.40 9.58 9.77 10.04 10.32 10.50
0.80 1.12 9.26 9.53 9.71 9.90 10.17 10.45 10.63
1.00 1.40 9.39 9.66 9.84 10.03 10.30 10.58 10.76
1.20 1.68 9.52 9.79 9.98 10.16 10.43 10.71 10.89
1.50 2.10 9.71 9.99 10.17 10.35 10.63 10.91 11.09
2.00 2.80 10.04 10.31 10.50 10.68 10.96 11.23 11.41
2.50 3.50 10.36 10.64 10.82 11.01 11.28 11.56 11.74
3.00 4.20 10.69 10.97 11.15 11.33 11.61 11.88 12.07
0.60 0.96 8.97 9.24 9.43 9.61 9.89 10.16 10.35
0.80 1.28 9.10 9.38 9.56 9.74 10.02 10.29 10.48
1.00 1.60 9.23 9.51 9.69 9.88 10.15 10.43 10.61
1.20 1.92 9.37 9.64 9.82 10.01 10.28 10.56 10.74
1.50 2.40 9.56 9.84 10.02 10.21 10.48 10.76 10.94
2.00 3.20 9.89 10.17 10.35 10.54 10.81 11.09 11.27
2.50 4.00 10.22 10.50 10.68 10.87 11.14 11.42 11.60
3.00 4.80 10.55 10.83 11.01 11.20 11.47 11.75 11.93
0.60 1.08 8.81 9.09 9.27 9.46 9.73 10.01 10.19
0.80 1.44 8.95 9.22 9.41 9.59 9.87 10.14 10.32
1.00 1.80 9.08 9.36 9.54 9.72 10.00 10.27 10.46
1.20 2.16 9.21 9.49 9.67 9.86 10.13 10.41 10.59
1.50 2.70 9.41 9.69 9.87 10.06 10.33 10.61 10.79
2.00 3.60 9.75 10.02 10.21 10.39 10.67 10.94 11.13
2.50 4.50 10.08 10.36 10.54 10.72 11.00 11.28 11.46
3.00 5.40 10.42 10.69 10.88 11.06 11.33 11.61 11.79
39
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 40 de 55
SUPPORTS: From 11 to 100, 140 to 143 (Belt 5841) and 8 to 14 (Belt 5851)

MATERIAL: Roca Sedimentaria Clástica - Arenisca, Limoarcillitas
WIDTH B (m) LONG: L (m) 2.00 2.20 2.50 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.50
0.80 0.80 1.59 1.72 1.90 2.09 2.22 2.35 2.53
1.00 1.00 1.67 1.80 1.99 2.18 2.30 2.43 2.62
1.20 1.20 1.75 1.88 2.07 2.26 2.38 2.51 2.70
1.50 1.50 1.88 2.00 2.19 2.38 2.51 2.63 2.82
2.00 2.00 2.08 2.21 2.40 2.59 2.71 2.84 3.03
2.50 2.50 2.29 2.42 2.61 2.79 2.92 3.05 3.24
3.00 3.00 2.50 2.62 2.81 3.00 3.13 3.25 3.44
0.80 0.96 1.59 1.72 1.91 2.10 2.22 2.35 2.54
1.00 1.20 1.68 1.80 1.99 2.18 2.31 2.43 2.62
1.20 1.44 1.76 1.89 2.08 2.26 2.39 2.52 2.71
1.50 1.80 1.89 2.01 2.20 2.39 2.52 2.64 2.83
2.00 2.40 2.09 2.22 2.41 2.60 2.72 2.85 3.04
2.50 3.00 2.30 2.43 2.62 2.81 2.93 3.06 3.25
3.00 3.60 2.51 2.64 2.83 3.02 3.14 3.27 3.46
0.80 1.12 1.60 1.72 1.91 2.10 2.23 2.35 2.54
1.00 1.40 1.68 1.81 2.00 2.19 2.31 2.44 2.63
1.20 1.68 1.77 1.89 2.08 2.27 2.40 2.52 2.71
1.50 2.10 1.89 2.02 2.21 2.40 2.52 2.65 2.84
2.00 2.80 2.10 2.23 2.42 2.61 2.73 2.86 3.05
2.50 3.50 2.31 2.44 2.63 2.82 2.94 3.07 3.26
3.00 4.20 2.53 2.65 2.84 3.03 3.16 3.28 3.47
0.80 1.28 1.60 1.73 1.92 2.11 2.23 2.36 2.55
1.00 1.60 1.69 1.81 2.00 2.19 2.32 2.44 2.63
1.20 1.92 1.77 1.90 2.09 2.28 2.40 2.53 2.72
1.50 2.40 1.90 2.03 2.22 2.40 2.53 2.66 2.85
2.00 3.20 2.11 2.24 2.43 2.62 2.74 2.87 3.06
2.50 4.00 2.33 2.45 2.64 2.83 2.96 3.08 3.27
3.00 4.80 2.54 2.67 2.86 3.04 3.17 3.30 3.49
0.80 1.44 1.61 1.73 1.92 2.11 2.24 2.36 2.55
1.00 1.80 1.69 1.82 2.01 2.20 2.32 2.45 2.64
1.20 2.16 1.78 1.90 2.09 2.28 2.41 2.53 2.72
1.50 2.70 1.91 2.03 2.22 2.41 2.54 2.66 2.85
2.00 3.60 2.12 2.25 2.44 2.63 2.75 2.88 3.07
2.50 4.50 2.34 2.47 2.65 2.84 2.97 3.10 3.28
3.00 5.40 2.55 2.68 2.87 3.06 3.18 3.31 3.50
40
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 41 de 55
SUPPORTS: From 101 to 139 (Belt 5841)

MATERIAL: Gravas arenosas limosas y arenas gravosas, calichosas, duras
WIDTH B (m) LONG: L (m) 2.00 2.20 2.50 2.8 3.00 3.20 3.50
0.80 0.80 2.89 3.18 3.62 4.06 4.36 4.65 5.1
1.00 1.00 2.88 3.17 3.61 4.05 4.34 4.64 5.08
1.20 1.20 2.87 3.16 3.6 4.04 4.33 4.62 5.06
1.50 1.50 2.87 3.16 3.59 4.02 4.31 4.61 5.05
2.00 2.00 3.02 3.16 3.59 4.02 4.30 4.59 5.03
2.50 2.50 3.00 3.30 3.77 4.03 4.31 4.59 5.02
3.00 3.00 3.02 3.30 3.75 4.21 4.53 4.61 5.03
0.80 0.96 2.76 3.04 3.46 3.87 4.15 4.43 4.85
1.00 1.20 2.76 3.03 3.45 3.87 4.15 4.43 4.84
1.20 1.44 2.76 3.03 3.45 3.86 4.14 4.42 4.84
1.50 1.80 2.77 3.04 3.45 3.86 4.14 4.41 4.83
2.00 2.40 2.93 3.06 3.47 3.87 4.14 4.42 4.83
2.50 3.00 2.92 3.21 3.66 3.90 4.16 4.43 4.84
3.00 3.60 2.96 3.23 3.65 4.09 4.39 4.46 4.86
0.80 1.12 2.67 2.94 3.34 3.74 4.01 4.28 4.68
1.00 1.40 2.67 2.94 3.34 3.74 4.01 4.27 4.68
1.20 1.68 2.68 2.94 3.34 3.74 4.01 4.27 4.67
1.50 2.10 2.70 2.96 3.35 3.75 4.01 4.28 4.67
2.00 2.80 2.86 2.99 3.38 3.77 4.03 4.29 4.69
2.50 3.50 2.87 3.15 3.58 3.81 4.06 4.32 4.71
3.00 4.20 2.92 3.18 3.58 4.00 4.29 4.36 4.75
0.80 1.28 2.6 2.86 3.25 3.64 3.9 4.16 4.55
1.00 1.60 2.61 2.87 3.25 3.64 3.9 4.16 4.55
1.20 1.92 2.62 2.88 3.26 3.65 3.9 4.16 4.55
1.50 2.40 2.64 2.89 3.28 3.66 3.91 4.17 4.56
2.00 3.20 2.81 2.94 3.31 3.69 3.94 4.20 4.58
2.50 4.00 2.83 3.10 3.51 3.74 3.99 4.24 4.61
3.00 4.80 2.89 3.14 3.53 3.94 4.22 4.29 4.66
0.80 1.44 2.55 2.8 3.18 3.56 3.81 4.07 4.45
1.00 1.80 2.56 2.81 3.19 3.57 3.82 4.07 4.45
1.20 2.16 2.57 2.82 3.2 3.57 3.83 4.08 4.46
1.50 2.70 2.6 2.85 3.22 3.59 3.84 4.09 4.47
2.00 3.60 2.77 2.90 3.26 3.63 3.88 4.12 4.50
2.50 4.50 2.80 3.06 3.47 3.68 3.93 4.17 4.54
3.00 5.40 2.86 3.11 3.49 3.89 4.16 4.23 4.59
41
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 42 de 55
6.7.2 Transfer Towers and Electrical Substation – Foundation Slabs

TRANSFER TOWERS TT3-6 and TT2-7 - ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION 5840-ER-100
Chart 6-8- Permissible load capacity for Slabs

DIMENSIONS OF
FOUNDATION BASE LEVEL, Df (m)
FOUNDATION SLABS
WIDTH B (m) LONG: L (m) 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50
10.00 10.00 15.43 15.89 16.34 16.80 17.26
12.00 12.00 16.70 17.16 17.62 18.08 18.54
14.00 14.00 17.98 18.44 18.89 19.35 19.81
16.00 16.00 19.25 19.71 20.17 20.63 21.09
10.00 12.50 15.32 15.78 16.24 16.70 17.16
12.00 15.00 16.61 17.07 17.53 17.99 18.45
14.00 17.50 17.91 18.37 18.83 19.28 19.74
16.00 20.00 19.20 19.66 20.12 20.58 21.04
10.00 15.00 15.21 15.67 16.13 16.59 17.05
12.00 18.00 16.53 16.99 17.45 17.90 18.36
14.00 21.00 17.84 18.30 18.76 19.22 19.68
16.00 24.00 19.15 19.61 20.07 20.53 20.99
10.00 17.50 15.11 15.57 16.03 16.49 16.95
12.00 21.00 16.44 16.90 17.36 17.82 18.28
14.00 24.50 17.77 18.23 18.69 19.15 19.61
16.00 28.00 19.10 19.56 20.02 20.48 20.94
The admissible load capacity curves for each type of foundation considered in Charts 6-5 to 6-8 are
shown in Annex 4.1.
6.8 Elastic or immediate settlement

According to the types of foundation materials defined for this report, it is expected that the
settlements generated due to the application of the loads of the structure are predominantly of the
elastic type. The settlement of the foundation will be calculated considering the types of foundations
recommended in the previous chapter. For the calculation of the settlements, it is assumed that the
stresses transmitted by the foundation will be equal to the admissible load capacity of the land.
The initial elastic settlement will be:
Si 
 
Qs B 1   2 I w
ES
42
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 43 de 55
Donde:
Si = Elastic settlement (cm.)

QS = Permissible effort transmitted (Ton/m2)
ES = Module of Elasticity of the base layer (Ton/m2)
B = Foundation width
 = Poisson ratio
Iw = Influence factor that depends on the form and rigidity of the foundation (Bowles, 1977)
For the settlement analysis of the structures that make up the project, the initial or instantaneous
settlement will be used, because the foundation soil is made up of granular material. The elastic
settlement of the surface foundation was evaluated considering a rigid foundation.
The total tolerable settlement in insulated footings must be less than 1 inch (2.54 cm) and 2 inches
(5.08 cm) in the case of foundations.
43
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 44 de 55
6.9 Settlement Results

6.9.1 Belt 5841-CB-110 and 5851-CB-110 – Footing
SUPPORTS: From 144 to 153 (Belt 5841) and From 0 to 7 (Belt 5851)
Chart 6-9- Elastic settlement

SETTLEMENT (cm)
WIDTH B (m) LONG: L (m) 1.50 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.50 2.80 3.00
0.60 0.60 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
0.80 0.80 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
1.00 1.00 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
1.20 1.20 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
1.50 1.50 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
2.00 2.00 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09
2.50 2.50 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
3.00 3.00 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14
0.60 0.72 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03
0.80 0.96 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04
1.00 1.20 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
1.20 1.44 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
1.50 1.80 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07
2.00 2.40 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09
2.50 3.00 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.12
3.00 3.60 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.15
0.60 0.84 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
0.80 1.12 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
1.00 1.40 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05
1.20 1.68 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06
1.50 2.10 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
2.00 2.80 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10
2.50 3.50 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.13
3.00 4.20 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.16
0.60 0.96 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
0.80 1.28 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
1.00 1.60 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
1.20 1.92 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
1.50 2.40 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08
2.00 3.20 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.11
2.50 4.00 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14
3.00 4.80 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.17
0.60 1.08 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
0.80 1.44 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
1.00 1.80 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
1.20 2.16 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07
1.50 2.70 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08
2.00 3.60 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
2.50 4.50 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15
3.00 5.40 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.18
44
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 45 de 55
SUPPORTS: From 11 to 100, 140 to 143 (Belt 5841) and 8 to 14 (Belt 5851)
Cuadro 6-10- Elastic settlement

MATERIAL: Roca Sedimentaria Clástica - Arenisca, Limoarcillitas
SETTLEMENT (cm)
WIDTH B (m) LONG: L (m) 2.00 2.20 2.50 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.50
0.80 0.80 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.13
1.00 1.00 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17
1.20 1.20 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.21
1.50 1.50 0.18 0.19 0.21 0.23 0.24 0.26 0.27
2.00 2.00 0.27 0.29 0.31 0.33 0.35 0.37 0.39
2.50 2.50 0.37 0.39 0.42 0.45 0.47 0.49 0.52
3.00 3.00 0.48 0.51 0.55 0.58 0.61 0.63 0.67
0.80 0.96 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.14
1.00 1.20 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.19
1.20 1.44 0.15 0.16 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.23
1.50 1.80 0.20 0.21 0.23 0.25 0.27 0.28 0.30
2.00 2.40 0.30 0.31 0.34 0.37 0.39 0.40 0.43
2.50 3.00 0.41 0.43 0.46 0.50 0.52 0.54 0.57
3.00 3.60 0.53 0.56 0.60 0.64 0.67 0.69 0.73
0.80 1.12 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.16
1.00 1.40 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.20
1.20 1.68 0.16 0.17 0.19 0.21 0.22 0.23 0.25
1.50 2.10 0.22 0.23 0.25 0.28 0.29 0.30 0.33
2.00 2.80 0.32 0.34 0.37 0.40 0.42 0.44 0.47
2.50 3.50 0.44 0.47 0.50 0.54 0.56 0.59 0.62
3.00 4.20 0.58 0.61 0.65 0.70 0.73 0.75 0.80
0.80 1.28 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17
1.00 1.60 0.14 0.15 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.22
1.20 1.92 0.18 0.19 0.21 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.27
1.50 2.40 0.24 0.25 0.27 0.30 0.31 0.33 0.35
2.00 3.20 0.35 0.37 0.40 0.43 0.45 0.47 0.51
2.50 4.00 0.48 0.51 0.55 0.59 0.61 0.64 0.68
3.00 4.80 0.63 0.66 0.71 0.75 0.79 0.82 0.86
0.80 1.44 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.18
1.00 1.80 0.15 0.16 0.18 0.19 0.21 0.22 0.23
1.20 2.16 0.19 0.20 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.27 0.29
1.50 2.70 0.25 0.27 0.30 0.32 0.34 0.35 0.38
2.00 3.60 0.38 0.40 0.43 0.47 0.49 0.51 0.54
2.50 4.50 0.52 0.55 0.59 0.63 0.66 0.69 0.73
3.00 5.40 0.68 0.71 0.76 0.81 0.85 0.88 0.93
45
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 46 de 55
SUPPORTS: From 101 to 139 (Belt 5841)

MATERIAL: Gravas arenosas limosas y arenas gravosas, calichosas, duras
SETTLEMENT (cm)
WIDTH B (m) LONG: L (m) 2.00 2.20 2.50 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.50
0.80 0.80 0.18 0.20 0.23 0.26 0.28 0.29 0.32
1.00 1.00 0.23 0.25 0.29 0.32 0.34 0.37 0.40
1.20 1.20 0.27 0.30 0.34 0.38 0.41 0.44 0.48
1.50 1.50 0.34 0.37 0.43 0.48 0.51 0.55 0.60
2.00 2.00 0.48 0.50 0.57 0.64 0.68 0.73 0.79
2.50 2.50 0.59 0.65 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.91 0.99
3.00 3.00 0.72 0.78 0.89 1.00 1.07 1.09 1.19
0.80 0.96 0.19 0.21 0.24 0.27 0.29 0.31 0.34
1.00 1.20 0.24 0.26 0.30 0.33 0.36 0.38 0.42
1.20 1.44 0.29 0.31 0.36 0.40 0.43 0.46 0.50
1.50 1.80 0.36 0.39 0.45 0.50 0.54 0.57 0.63
2.00 2.40 0.51 0.53 0.60 0.67 0.72 0.76 0.83
2.50 3.00 0.63 0.69 0.79 0.84 0.90 0.96 1.05
3.00 3.60 0.77 0.84 0.95 1.06 1.14 1.16 1.26
0.80 1.12 0.20 0.22 0.25 0.28 0.30 0.32 0.35
1.00 1.40 0.25 0.28 0.31 0.35 0.38 0.40 0.44
1.20 1.68 0.30 0.33 0.38 0.42 0.45 0.48 0.53
1.50 2.10 0.38 0.42 0.47 0.53 0.56 0.60 0.66
2.00 2.80 0.54 0.56 0.63 0.71 0.76 0.80 0.88
2.50 3.50 0.67 0.74 0.84 0.89 0.95 1.01 1.10
3.00 4.20 0.82 0.89 1.01 1.12 1.21 1.23 1.33
0.80 1.28 0.21 0.23 0.26 0.29 0.32 0.34 0.37
1.00 1.60 0.26 0.29 0.33 0.37 0.39 0.42 0.46
1.20 1.92 0.32 0.35 0.40 0.44 0.47 0.50 0.55
1.50 2.40 0.40 0.44 0.50 0.55 0.59 0.63 0.69
2.00 3.20 0.57 0.59 0.67 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.93
2.50 4.00 0.72 0.78 0.89 0.94 1.01 1.07 1.17
3.00 4.80 0.88 0.95 1.07 1.19 1.28 1.30 1.41
0.80 1.44 0.22 0.24 0.28 0.31 0.33 0.35 0.39
1.00 1.80 0.28 0.30 0.35 0.39 0.41 0.44 0.48
1.20 2.16 0.33 0.37 0.42 0.46 0.50 0.53 0.58
1.50 2.70 0.42 0.46 0.52 0.58 0.62 0.67 0.73
2.00 3.60 0.60 0.63 0.71 0.79 0.84 0.89 0.97
2.50 4.50 0.76 0.83 0.94 1.00 1.06 1.13 1.23
3.00 5.40 0.93 1.01 1.13 1.26 1.35 1.37 1.49
46
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 47 de 55
6.9.2 Transfer Towers and Electrical Substation – Foundation Slabs

TRANSFER TOWERS TT3-6 and TT2-7 - ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION 5840-ER-100

SETTLEMENT (cm)
DIMENSIONS OF
FOUNDATION BASE LEVEL, Df (m)
FOUNDATION SLABS
WIDTH B (m) LONG: L (m) 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50
10.00 10.00 0.58 0.59 0.61 0.63 0.64
12.00 12.00 0.75 0.77 0.79 0.81 0.83
14.00 14.00 0.94 0.96 0.99 1.01 1.03
16.00 16.00 1.15 1.18 1.20 1.23 1.26
10.00 12.50 0.64 0.66 0.68 0.70 0.71
12.00 15.00 0.83 0.85 0.88 0.90 0.92
14.00 17.50 1.04 1.07 1.10 1.12 1.15
16.00 20.00 1.28 1.31 1.34 1.37 1.40
10.00 15.00 0.73 0.76 0.78 0.80 0.82
12.00 18.00 0.96 0.98 1.01 1.04 1.06
14.00 21.00 1.20 1.24 1.27 1.30 1.33
16.00 24.00 1.48 1.51 1.55 1.58 1.62
10.00 17.50 0.76 0.78 0.81 0.83 0.85
12.00 21.00 0.99 1.02 1.05 1.07 1.10
14.00 24.50 1.25 1.28 1.32 1.35 1.38
16.00 28.00 1.54 1.57 1.61 1.65 1.68
The settlements that will take place in the isolated footings and foundations are less than 2.54 cm (1
") and 5.08 cm (2") respectively. Therefore, there would be no settlement problems in the projected
structure.
Because the type of soil is represented by a granular material, the differential settlement can be
estimated as 75% of the total settlement.
The settlement curves for each type of foundation considered in Charts 6-9 to 6-12 are shown in
Annex 4.2.
7. CHEMICAL SOIL AGGRESSION

The high concentration of harmful chemicals present in the soil causes harmful effects on the
structural elements of the foundation and those that are also in contact with the ground, specifically
in materials such as concrete and reinforcing steel. In this sense, it is important to evaluate the level
of concentration of substances such as chlorides, sulfates and soluble salts. The permissible limits
recommended for each substance are shown in Table 18. The source of this information corresponds
to the recommendations of the American Concrete Institute (Committee 318-83 ACI) in the cases of
sulfates and chlorides and to the experience of the consultant in the other cases.
47
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 48 de 55
During the field exploration, disturbed soil samples were recovered at points near the foundation.
The results are shown in Annex 3.4 and the corresponding summary is presented in the following
Table 7.1.
Table 7.1 – Chemical Analysis Summary
Sulfatos
Cloruros Sales Solubles
Calicata Sample Depth. (m) SO42 PH
CI- (ppm) Totales (ppm)
(ppm)
C-01 M-01 1.00 – 1.40 14 290.38 2 497.56 39 000.00 7.10
C-03 M-02 1.30 16 460.53 2 833.58 50 640.00 -
C-04 M-03 2.50 – 2.60 3 219.77 1 090.28 9 080.00 -
C-05 M-04 2.50 – 3.00 2 905.56 1 431.10 8 938.80 -
C-06 M-05 1.20 – 1.40 7 148.74 2 689.68 21 840.00 7.60
C-06 M-11 1.00 – 1.20 22 362.00 3 151.22 53 196.00 -
C-08 M-06 2.50 – 3.40 17 701.63 4 149.79 47 040.00 -
C-09 M-07 1.70 1 769.81 829.58 5 942.00 -
C-10 M-08 1.80 – 1.90 23 049.00 1 248.78 62 400.00 7.40
When comparing the results obtained from the laboratory with the levels of harmful concentration
indicated, it is verified that there is an aggressive action of the different foundation materials on the
concrete of the foundation.
The sulphate content of the foundation layers has a degree of severe alteration which affects the
structures that make up the foundation and will be in direct contact with the aforementioned layers. .
The average concentration of chlorides present in the foundation materials is greater than the
permissible limit (greater than 6,000 ppm), which indicates that there is a risk of corrosion that could
affect the steel of the foundation when it comes into contact with the external environment.
Also, the concentration of total soluble salts present in the soil and foundation rock is greater than
the permissible limit (greater than 15,000 ppm). According to these results obtained from the
chemical analysis tests, leachable soils of low solubility are presented.
considerations that guarantee the durability of the concrete.
48
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 49 de 55
8. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

• SHP requested the services of ZER to carry out the Complementary Geotechnical Study for
Foundation design of " Conveyor Belt System 5841-CB-110 and 5851-CB-110" that is part of the
project "Expansion of Mine Operations and Benefit Plant". This project is located in the area of
San Nicolas, district of Marcona, province of Nasca, in the region of Ica.
• The present report summarizes the geotechnical and geological investigations carried out in the
study area and its subsequent analysis in the cabinet for the design of the foundation elements
of the conveyor belts and transfer towers. These geotechnical works include pit excavations, field
tests, geophysical tests and laboratory tests on representative samples of soils that conform the
foundation ground of the conveyor belts 5841-CB-110 and 5851-CB-110. Furthermore, there are
annexes that include the field and laboratory tests records, information processing and foundation
analysis, which are the basis of the present geotechnical study.
• For the development of this study it was included the review of the information provided by SHP,
consisting of the studies conducted by CWE and Anddes. Below are the documents that were
considered of interest for the development of this report.
Report "Geotechnical Study - Package N ° 6", CWE, 2014.
Report "Geotechnical Study - Package N ° 10", CWE, 2014.
Report "Geotechnical Investigations for the New Benefit Plant", Anddes, 2016.
• According to the seismic zoning map proposed in the Technical Standard E030 "Seismic Design"
(2016), the study area is located in Zone 04, corresponding to a zone factor equal to 0.45. This
factor is expressed as a fraction of the gravity acceleration nd is that maximum horizontal
acceleration in rigid ground with a probability of 10.0% of being exceeded in 50 years.
• The field work was carried out between October 14 and 20, 2017 and consisted of excavation of
eleven (11) test pits with mechanical equipment and variable depths reaching a maximum depth
of 4.70 m, fourteen (14) DPL tests reaching at a maximum depth of 2.60 m, thirteen (13) MASW
tests, fourteen (14) lines of seismic refraction, sampling of disturbed samples and geological
mapping. Drawing 993 462-5700-G-GF-DWG-002 shows the location of the field works, which
were distributed according to the location of the supporting structures of the belts 5841-CB-110,
5851-CB-110 and structures of the TT3-6 and TT2-7 transfer towers.
The geotechnical logging of the cut slopes (trenches T-01 and T-02) observed near the existing
transfer towers belonging to each belt under study was also carried out.
• According to the Technical Standard E.030 "Seismic Design" (2016), the shear wave velocities
obtained were compared with the characteristic velocity ranges of each soil profile in order to
define the site conditions.
Therefore, for the structural evaluation of the structure, according to the Technical Standard
E.030 "Seismic Design" (2016), considering the location of the project and the classification of
the type of soil, the following parameters are available:
Factor de zona (Z) : 0.45 (Zona 04, ver apartado 2.2 de la Norma E.030)
Tipo de perfil de suelo : S1
Factor de suelo (S): 1.00
Período Tp : 0.4 segundos
Período TL : 2.5 segundos
Tipo de perfil de suelo : S2

Factor de suelo (S): 1.05
Período Tp : 0.6 segundos
Período TL : 2.0 segundos
49
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 50 de 55
• According to the field work, the presence of the groundater level has not been recorded in any of
the pits and tests carried out by ZER and also in the drilling carried out by CWE (2014) and
Anddes (2016). As a conclusion, it can be affirmed that there is no evidence of the presence of
groundwater level in the study area up to the maximum explored depth of 10 m in the perforations
made by CWE (2014).
• According to the records of the geotechnical investigations and the results of the laboratory tests
of soil and rock mechanics, the geotechnical characterization of the materials that will conform
the foundation ground was carried out and for this, three foundation materials types have been
defined for all the location of the support structures of belts 5841-CB-110, 5851-CB-110, transfer
towers TT3-6, TT2-7 and Electric Sub-Station 5840-ER-100.
Foundation Material I (MC-1) .- Intrusive igneous rock - Monzogranite: igneous rock of coarse
to fine texture, pink to greenish gray, strongly fractured with the presence of andesitic dikes.
Foundation Material II (MC-2) .- Sedimentary Clásica Rock - Sandstone, Limoarcillite: It consists
classifications of low plasticity sandy loam (ML), low plasticity sand loam (ML) and clay loam sand
(SC-SM).
Foundation Material III (MC-3) .- Silty sandy gravels and gravel, calichosas, hard sands: Thick
conglomerate interspersed with sand, silt and clay that is covered superficially by wind sands of
medium to fine granulometry of igneous origin, cemented by solutions of calcareous material and
whose thickness can reach up to 15 m. It presents SUCS classifications of poorly graded sand
with silt (SP-SM), poorly graded gravel (GP) and poorly graded gravel with silt (GP-GM).
In Plano 993 462-5700-G-GF-DWG-003 the distribution of these foundation materials defined for
the present project can be observed.
• According to the information provided by SHP, the structures that make up Belts 5841-CB-110
and 5851-CB-110 will be located by means of insulated footings, which will be based on the three
types of foundation materials indicated in chapter 6.1 . The transfer towers TT3-6 and TT2-7 as
well as the sub-station 5840-ER-100 will be emplaced by means of foundation pavements, which
will be cemented necessarily on igneous monzogranite rock.
• Foundation levels for the structures that make up the project are proposed from the natural level
of the land and are projected on the three types of foundation materials. The foundation depths
of the footings and foundation pits varies between 1.50 to 3.50 m.
Foundation Material I (MC-1):
Considering that field geotechnical investigations have observed fillings that could not be
controlled, it is established that if the builder considers maintaining the foundations levels at higher
levels initially projected, he should consider the use of fluid fillings with resistance Fc 'greater or
equal to the allowable load capacity indicated in Table 6-5.
Foundation Material II (MC-2) and Foundation Material III (MC-3):
If loose material is found with the presence of shells and marine debris in a large proportion during
the excavation of the foundation to its level of drag, this material should be removed and the
foundations deepened by false footings until reaching the competent stratum considered as
foundation material .
After this cleaning if the builder considers maintaining the foundations levels at higher levels
initially projected, he should consider the use of controlled fillings from solid type materials up to
fluid fillings with resistance Fc 'greater than or equal to the admissible load capacity indicated in
the Tables 6-6 and 6-7.
50
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 51 de 55
• The admissible capacity of the different foundation materials for different depths has been
evaluated in order to provide a range of values that allow knowing the variation of the bearing
capacity for the different projected structures and thus allow a decision making consistent with
the conditions of project operation.
• Below is a summary of the shear strength properties of the three types of foundation materials
involved in the analysis of allowable load capacity and calculation of elastic settlements. These
geotechnical parameters apply to the design of foundations of all the structures that make up the
project.
Summary of strength parameters of foundation materials
Specific Internal Module of

Cohesión Poisson
FOUNDATION MATERIAL Weight Friction Young "E"
"c" (Mpa) Ratio "µ"
(gr/cm3) Angle (Ø) (Mpa)
2.60 32 0.12 2000 0.30
Monzogranite
Sedimentary Clastic Rock -
2.10 30 0 107.5 0.39
Sandstone, Limoarcillites
Silty sandy gravels and gravelly

1.90 35 0 95 0.29
sands, hard cemented gravel
• When comparing the results obtained from the laboratory with the levels of harmful concentration
indicated, it is verified that there is an aggressive action of the different foundation materials on
the concrete of the foundation.
The sulphate content of the foundation layers has a degree of severe alteration which affects the
structures that make up the foundation and will be in direct contact with the aforementioned layers.
The average concentration of chlorides present in the foundation materials is greater than the
permissible limit, which indicates that there is a risk of corrosion that could affect the steel of the
foundation when it comes into contact with the external environment. Also, the concentration of
total soluble salts present in the soil and foundation rock is greater than the permissible limit.
According to these results obtained from the chemical analysis tests, leachable soils of low
solubility are presented.
considerations that guarantee the durability of the concrete.
• Based on the geological survey, it is concluded that the study area presents igneous intrusive
rocks, sedimentary rocks and deposits of unbound materials such as wind, alluvial, colluvial,
marine and anthropogenic.
• Geomorphologically, the structures that make up the project will be located on a hill and low and
on a plain.
• The geological ages of the rocks range from the Lower Paleozoic to the Tertiary. The
unconsolidated deposits are of Quaternary age.
• The rocks are strongly fractured and failed. The sedimentary rocks, present folding.
• The faults observed, show tectonic stability, no activity of recent displacements was observed.
After the completion of the excavations it was verified that there is no evidence of movement
elements or fault elements such as: defined planes, fault grooves, fault gaps, mylonites, jumps or
displacements.
51
993462-5700-G-GF-INF-0001 Rev. 1
Page.: 52 de 55
• The external geodynamic processes are aeolian, the possibility of tsunamis, flooding in the plain.
The most dangerous internal geodynamic process is seismicity.
• It is recommended to inspect the cuts in the rock during the construction works, with the purpose
of identifying if the families of existing discontinuities and faults, which could not be detected
during the surface explorations carried out, are stable. This in order to monitor the possibility that
they are reactivated.
52
Tablas
ESTUDIO GEOTÉCNICO COMPLEMENTARIO CON FINES DE
CIMENTACIÓN “SISTEMAS DE FAJAS TRANSPORTADORAS 5841-
CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
Revisión B Noviembre 2017 Página 1 de 8
Tabla 1: Ensayos Geofísicos – Refracción Sísmica

Ensayo Ubicación Este (m) Norte (m) Longitud (m) Tipo de Onda
Inicio 476432 8312036
LS-01 72.0 Ondas P
Fin 476452 8312105
Inicio 476431 8312213
LS-02 72.0 Ondas P
Fin 476492 8312175
Inicio 476477 8312341
LS-03 72.0 Ondas P
Fin 476528 8312291
Inicio 476524 8312407
LS-04 96.0 Ondas P
Fin 476548 8312500
Inicio 476566 8312587
LS-05 96.0 Ondas P
Fin 476588 8312680
Inicio 476620 8312803
LS-06 72.0 Ondas P
Fin 476635 8312874
Inicio 476682 8313083
LS-07 96.0 Ondas P
Fin 476705 8313177
Inicio 476719 8313224
LS-08 72.0 Ondas P
Fin 476731 8313295
Inicio 476721 83133701
LS-09 72.0 Ondas P
Fin 4767871 8313397
Inicio 476777 8313437
LS-10 72.0 Ondas P
Fin 476814 8313498
Inicio 476334 8312392
LS-01’ 72.0 Ondas P
Fin 476365 8312327
Inicio 476222 8312576
Fin 476294 8312576
Inicio 476212 8312609
Fin 476284 8312610
Inicio 476263 8312679
Fin 476210 8312631
Tabla 2: Ensayos Geofísicos – Sondajes MASW

MASW-01 Centro 476436 8312060 53.0 Onda S
MASW-01’ Centro 476350 8312360 58.5 Onda S
Tablas P063-214 SHOUGANG
CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
Tabla 3: Trabajos Geotécnicos – Calicatas/ Trincheras

Calicata /
Prof. (m) Este (m) Norte (m)
Trinchera
C-01 1.40 476419 8312056
C-02 1.30 476438 8312064
C-03 1.30 476482 8312243
C-04 2.70 476530 8312428
C-05 3.00 476550 8312519
C-06 1.40 476576 8312621
C-07 4.70 476666 8313012
C-08 3.40 476742 8313324
C-09 1.70 476342 8312361
C-10 1.90 476234 8312606
C-11 0.90 476292 8312486
T-01 1.90 476784 8313434
T-02 4.50 476203 8312618
Tabla 4: Trabajos Geotécnicos – DPL

DPL Prof. (m) Este (m) Norte (m)
DPL-01 1.00 476769 8313441
DPL-02 0.60 476759 8313395
DPL-03 0.80 476746 8313344
DPL-04 1.30 476729 8313269
DPL-05 0.80 476691 8313113
DPL-06 2.60 476633 8312868
DPL-07 0.40 476587 8312683
DPL-08 0.90 476546 8312502
DPL-09 0.60 476468 8312173
DPL-10 0.40 476468 8312187
DPL-11 0.50 476477 8312239
DPL-12 0.40 476495 8312293
DPL-13 0.60 476508 8312344
DPL-14 0.70 476296 8312480
Tabla 5: Trabajos Geológicos- Geotécnicos – Estaciones Geomecánicas

Estación
Este (m) Norte (m)
Geomecánica
EG-01 476444 8312104
EG-02 476466 8312155
EG-03 476480 8312196
EG-04 476813 8313483
EG-05 476213 8312621

CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
Tabla 6: Descripción de Materiales y Velocidades de Ondas P – Refracción Sísmica

Sondaje Estrato Vp(m/s) Espesor (m) Descripción
1 1200 – 2000 2.6 – 4.8 Roca fracturada
LS-01
2 2000 – 2200 19.5 – 21.3 Roca ligeramente fracturada a Sana
1 1000 – 2000 2.3 – 2.9 Roca fracturada
LS-02
1 1200 – 2000 0.8 – 1.3 Roca fracturada
LS-03
Materiales de consistencia media o
1 700 – 900 1.6 – 5.8
compacidad medianamente densa
LS-04
Materiales de consistencia firme o
2 >900 27.0 – 30.3
compacidad densa/Roca blanda
1 800 – 900 0 – 0.4
LS-05
2 900 – 1200 31.5 – 32.0
1 600 – 900 1.5 – 9.8
LS-06
2 900 – 1200 14.1 – 22.5
1 500 – 700 0 – 4.8
LS-07
2 >700 25.1 – 30.0
1 500 – 800 11.9 – 12.7
LS-08
2 >800 11.2 – 12.0
1 600 – 900 4.0 – 5.1
LS-09
2 >900 18.8 – 19.9
1 400 – 900 4.2 – 5.0
LS-10
2 900 – 1100 18.9 – 19.7
1 400 – 2000 1.8 – 15.8 Suelo muy denso/Roca fracturada
LS-01’
1 600 – 1000 2.1 – 2.2
LS-02’
2 1000 – 1600 21.3 – 21.4
1 600 – 1000 1.6 – 1.8
LS-03’
2 1000 – 1400 22.2 – 22.3
1 400 – 1000 2.8 – 3.4
LS-04’
2 1000 – 1200 20.5 – 21.1

CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
Tabla 7: Descripción de Materiales y Velocidades de Ondas S – Sondajes MASW

Sondaje Estrato Vs (m/s) Espesor (m) Descripción
1 995 – 1065 5.2 Roca fracturada
MASW-01
2 305 - 485 24.8 Roca ligeramente fracturada a Sana
MASW-02
1 1295 – 1455 3.7 Roca ligeramente fracturada a Sana
MASW-03
2 1530 - 1690 26.3 Roca Sana
1 400 – 450 3.7
MASW-04
2 470 - 640 26.3
1 385 – 765 8.9
MASW-05 Materiales de consistencia muy firme o
2 830 - 1000 21.1 compacidad muy densa/ Roca ligeramente
fracturada
1 320 – 350 15.5
MASW-06
2 385 - 425 14.5
1 226 – 340 15.5
MASW-07
2 375 - 445 14.5
1 300 – 355 8.9
MASW-08
2 375 - 480 21.1
1 250 – 360 7.0
MASW-09
2 390 - 580 23.0
1 670 – 785 5.2 Suelo muy denso/Roca fracturada
MASW-01´
MASW-02´
1 475 – 515 3.7
MASW-03´
2 515 - 815 26.3
1 240 – 385 5.2
MASW-04´
2 425 - 580 24.8

CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
Tabla 8: Clasificación de los perfiles de suelo de acuerdo a la velocidad de ondas de corte (Vs),
E.030-2016
Clasificación Perfil de suelo ̅𝑠 (m/s)
𝑉 30
Roca dura S0 ≥ 1500.0
Roca o Suelos muy rígidos S1 500.0 a 1500.0
Suelos Intermedios S2 180.0 a 500.0
Suelos Blandos S3 ≤ 180.0
̅𝑠 : Velocidad de propagación de ondas de corte a los 30.0m superiores del perfil de suelo.
𝑉 30
Tabla 9: Resultados de Ensayos Estándar para Clasificación de Suelos – Calicatas/ Trincheras

Ensayos Estándar
Calicata/
Muestra Prof. (m) W LL LP IP Grava Arena Fino
Trinchera SUCS
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
C-04 M-03 2.50 – 2.60 SP-SM 1.55 -- NP NP 20.9 67.4 11.7
C-05 M-04 2.50 – 3.00 GP 4.75 -- NP NP 64.2 34.5 1.3
C-06 M-05 1.20 – 1.40 GP-GM 6.03 -- NP NP 51.5 41.2 7.4
C-08 M-06 2.50 – 3.40 ML 10.53 26 23 3 2.2 38.1 59.7
C-10 M-08 1.80 – 1.90 ML 2.34 31 24 7 0 24.1 75.9
T-01 M-09 - ML 6.00 37 27 10 0 2.8 97.2
T-02 M-10 - SC-SM 20.32 31 25 6 1.0 63.5 35.5
Tabla 10: Resultados de Ensayo de Peso Volumétrico de Suelos Cohesivos

Densidad del Densidad del
Calicata/ Suelo Natural Suelo Seco
Muestra Prof. (m)
Trinchera
(kN/m3) (kN/m3)
C-08 M-06 2.30 – 3.40 20.33 18.40
C-10 M-08 1.80 – 1.90 18.49 18.10
T-01 M-09 - 18.99 17.90
T-02 M-10 - 16.03 13.30
Tabla 11: Resultados de Ensayos Especiales – Corte Directo

Densidad
C Ø
Calicata Muestra Prof. (m) SUCS húmeda
(kPa) (º)
(KN/m3)
Tabla 12: Resultados de Ensayos Especiales – Compresión Triaxial UU

Densidad
C Ø
Calicata Muestra Prof. (m) SUCS* húmeda
(kPa) (º)
(KN/m3)
C-06 M-05 1.20 – 1.40 GM 19.08 28 35.63
*Matriz ensayada

CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
Tabla 13: Descripción macroscópica de roca

Estación
Muestra Característica Descripción Macroscópica
Geomecánica
Naturaleza de la roca Ígnea
Grado de
Leve a moderado
meteorización
Estructura masiva, mostrando superficies
Estructura y fractura
de fractura rugosas.
EG -01 M-01 Principalmente ortosa, plagioclasas,
Minerales esenciales
cuarzo y anfíboles (hornblenda)
Reacción al Ácido
Negativo
clorhídrico (HCl)
Clasificación
Granito hornbléndico
macroscópica
Tabla 104: Resultados de Ensayos - Propiedades Físicas de la Roca

Estación Densidad seca Densidad húmeda Absorción Peso Específico
Muestra
Geomecánica (gr/cm3) (gr/cm3) (%) Aparente (KN/m3)
EG -01 M-01 2.68 2.69 0.45 26.35
EG -02 M-02 2.59 2.63 1.50 25.66
EG -03 M-03 2.66 2.67 0.42 26.18
EG -04 M-04 2.14 2.23 4.20 21.62
EG -05 M-05 1.69 2.20 30.20 17.72
Tabla 115: Resultados de Ensayos – Carga Puntual en Roca

Diámetro Carga de Indice de carga Resistencia a la
Estación
Muestra equivalente Rotura puntual “Is” Compresion simple
Geomecánica
(mm) (KN) (MPa) (MPa)
39.8 1.60 1.03 21.5
38.7 1.30 0.89 18.5
42.6 1.90 1.03 22.2
EG -02 M-02
41.1 1.30 0.77 16.3
40.1 1.90 1.21 25.4
Promedio 0.99 20.8
35.1 5.4 4.39 88.4
38.0 4.2 2.91 60.1
38.0 5.5 3.81 78.7
EG -03 M-03
38.3 6.2 4.23 87.5
40.7 6.6 3.98 84.1
Promedio 3.86 79.8
Tabla 16: Resultado de Ensayos – Compresión Uniaxial en Roca

Resistencia a Resistencia a
Carga de
Estación Diámetro Altura la Compresion la Compresion
Muestra rotura
Geomecánica (cm) (cm) uniaxial uniaxial
(KN)
(Kg/cm2) (MPa)
EG -01 M-01 4.38 8.92 157.8 1071 105.0

EG -02 M-02 4.38 8.99 46.8 318 31.2
EG -04 M-04 4.30 8.81 26.9 190 18.6

CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
Carga de
Estación Diámetro Altura la Compresion la Compresion
Muestra rotura
Geomecánica (cm) (cm) uniaxial uniaxial
(KN)
(Kg/cm2) (MPa)
EG -05 M-05 7.62 13.08 3.6 8 0.8
Tabla 127: Resultados de Ensayos de Análisis Químico

Cloruros Sulfatos Sales Solubles
Calicata Muestra Prof. (m) PH
CI- (ppm) SO42 (ppm) Totales (ppm)
C-01 M-01 1.00 – 1.40 14 290.38 2 497.56 39 000.00 7.10
C-03 M-02 1.30 16 460.53 2 833.58 50 640.00 -
C-04 M-03 2.50 – 2.60 3 219.77 1 090.28 9 080.00 -
C-05 M-04 2.50 – 3.00 2 905.56 1 431.10 8 938.80 -
C-06 M-05 1.20 – 1.40 7 148.74 2 689.68 21 840.00 7.60
C-06 M-11 1.00 – 1.20 22 362.00 3 151.22 53 196.00 -
C-08 M-06 2.50 – 3.40 17 701.63 4 149.79 47 040.00 -
C-09 M-07 1.70 1 769.81 829.58 5 942.00 -
C-10 M-08 1.80 – 1.90 23 049.00 1 248.78 62 400.00 7.40
Tabla 138: Sustancias químicas nocivas para la cimentación

Sustancias Partes por Grado de
Observaciones
nocivas millón (ppm) alteración
0 - 1000 Leve
1000 - 2000 Moderado
Ocasiona un ataque químico al
SULFATOS (1) 2000 -
Severo concreto de la cimentación.
20,000
> 20,000 Muy severo
Ocasiona problemas de corrosión de
CLORUROS (1) > 6,000 Perjudicial
armaduras o elementos metálicos.
SALES Ocasiona problemas de pérdida de
SOLUBLES > 15,000 Perjudicial resistencia mecánica por problema de
TOTALES (2) lixiviación.
(1) Comité 318-83 ACI
(2) Experiencia del Consultor
Tabla 149: Requisitos para Concreto expuesto a Soluciones con Sulfatos

Sulfatos
Solubles en Sulfatos Relación f’c
Tipo de Tipo de
Agua (SO4) (SO4) Agua/Cemento mínimo a 28
exposición a Cemento
presentes en agua recomendado días
los sulfatos Recomendado
en suelos (ppm) (concreto normal) (MPa)
(% en peso)
Ningún
Ningún requisito Ningún requisito
DESPRECIABLE requisito
especial para especial para
(Exposición 0 a 0.10 0 a 150 especial para
resistencia a los resistencia a los
Clase 0) resistencia a
Sulfatos Sulfatos
los Sulfatos
C 150 Tipo II o
MODERADA
150 a equivalentes:
(Exposición 0.10 a 0.20 0.50 26
1500 IP(MS), IS(MS),
Clase 1)
I(PM) (MS),I(SM)
CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
Sulfatos
Solubles en Sulfatos Relación f’c
Tipo de Tipo de
Agua (SO4) (SO4) Agua/Cemento mínimo a 28
exposición a Cemento
presentes en agua recomendado días
los sulfatos Recomendado
en suelos (ppm) (concreto normal) (MPa)
(% en peso)
(MS)
SEVERA
1,500 a C 150 Tipo V o
(Exposición 0.20 a 2.00 0.45 29
10,000 equivalentes
Clase 2)
MUY SEVERA C 150 Tipo V
Sobre
(Exposición Sobre 2.00 más Puzolana o 0.40 33
10,000
Clase 3) Escoria
C 150 con
Exposición al contenidos de
- - Menor a 0.45 35
agua de mar C3A de hasta
10%(*)
Referencia: Guía para la Durabilidad del Hormigón ACI 201.2R-08
(*) C3A: Aluminato tricálcico

Anexos
Anexo 1.0 – Ensayos Geofísicos
Anexo 1.1 – Ensayo Geofísicos - Perfiles de
Refracción Sísmica
Faja Transportadora 5841–CB–110 & Torre de
Transferencia TT3-6
LS-01
140
130
MASW-02
2200
2000
120 1800
1600
1400 1200
0 954
967
1,021
5 1,098
1,156
Cota de Terreno (msnm)
110 1,199
10 1,234
1,265
15 1,280
1,287
100
20 1,294
1,308
25 1,333
90 1,372
30
1000 1200
80
70
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72
Vp (m/s)
1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200
Roca Fracturada Roca ligeramente fracturada

a Sana
LS-02
100
90
1000 1200
1400 1600
1800
2000
2200
2400
80
70
60
50
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72
Distancia (m)
Vp (m/s)
1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400
Roca Fracturada Roca ligeramente fracturada

a Sana
LS-03
70
60
1200 1400
1600 1800 2000
2200 2400
2600 2800 3000
Cota de Terreno (msnm) 3200 3400
50
40
30
20
Vp (m/s)
1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400
Roca Fracturada Roca ligeramente fracturada a Sana

LS-04
70
MASW-04
60
700
800 0
402
900 421
452
50 5 471
485
500
10 502
529
40 15 556
589
20 602
616
30 25 630
641
30
500 600
20
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96
Distancia (m)
Vp (m/s)
Vp (m/s)
700 800 900
Materiales de consistencia Materiales de consistencia

media o compacidad firme o compacidad
medianamente densa densa/Roca blanda
LS-05
60
800
900
50 1000
1100
1200
40
30
20
10
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96
Distancia (m)
Vp (m/s)
Vp (m/s)
800 900 1000 1100 1200

LS-06
60
50
600
700
40
800
900
1000
1100
1200
30
20
10
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72
Distancia (m)
Vp (m/s)
600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200

LS-07
50
500
600
40
700
30
20
10
0
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96
Distancia (m)
Vp (m/s)
500 600 700

LS-08
50
40
500
600
30
700
800
20
10
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72
Distancia (m)
Vp (m/s)
500 600 700 800

LS-09
50
MASW-08
40
0
600 301
299
Cota de Terreno (msnm) 700 286
800
900 5 295
318
30 354
10 377
404
15 415
439
20
20 458
465
25 474
10 481
30
300 400
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72
Distancia (m)
Vp (m/s)
600 700 800 900

LS-10
50
40
MASW-09
400 0
250
500 265
600
30 700 292
800
900 331
1000 5
360
390
1100
10 412
430
20
15 460
488
20 524
10 558
25 568
579
30
300 400 500
0
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72
Distancia (m)
Vp (m/s)
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

Faja Transportadora 5851–CB-110 & Torre de
Transferencia TT2-7
LS-01'
90
80
TERRENO NATURAL
MASW-01'
0 672
70
687
400
728
600
800 1000 5 785
1200
1400 916
1600 1,047
1800 10 1,128
60 1,235
2000
15 1,310
2200
1,363
20 1,388
50
1,406
25 1,427
1,457
30
700 900 1100 1300
40
30
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72
Distancia (m)
Vp (m/s)
400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200
Suelo muy denso/Roca fracturada Roca ligeramente fracturada

a Sana
LS-02'
60
TERRENO NATURAL
MASW-03'
50
0
474
600 488
800
1000 490
1200
5 516
1400 550
605
40 10 647
676
1600
15 706
735
30 763
20
786
25 804
815
20
30
500 700
10
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72
Distancia (m)
Vp (m/s)
400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

LS-03'
60
TERRENO NATURAL
50
600
800
1000
1200
1400
40
30
20
10
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72
Distancia (m)
Vp (m/s)
400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

LS-04'
50
TERRENO NATURAL
MASW-04'
40
400
5 240
272
600
800 336
1000 387
5
428
458
30 1200
10 483
501
518
15
534
20
20 555
568
25 572
578
10
30
300 400
00
0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72
Distancia (m)
Vp (m/s)
Vp (m/s)
400 600 800 1000 1200

Anexo 1.2 – Ensayos Geofísicos - Modelo
Unidimensional de Ondas de Corte MASW
Transferencia TT3-6
Estudio Geotécnico complementario con Fines de Cimentación "Sistema de Fajas Transportadoras 5841-CB-110 y
5851-CB-110"
B Noviembre, 2017 Página 1 de 9
MASW-01
Ubicación: San Nicolas - Marcona Sistema de coordenadas: UTM-WGS84-18S Realizado: M.P.J.
Coordenadas: E [m] 476436.00 N [m] 8312060.00 Revisado: M.C.A.
Curva de dispersión Perfil Unidimensional Cuadro Resumen
Velocidad de fase [m/s] Vs [m/s] d* [m] Vs [m/s] d/Vs

400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 1.1 996 0.00108
0 996 1.2 1006 0.00123
1,006
Roca Fracturada 1,025 1.4 1025 0.00137
1,064
5 1.6 1064 0.00147
1,116
P: 5.2 m
1,209 1.7 1116 0.00155
10 1,350 1.9 1209 0.00157

Frecuencia (Hz)
Profundidad [m]
1,424 2.1 1350 0.00153

1,466 2.2 1424 0.00156
15
Roca ligeramente
1,502 2.4 1466 0.00163
fracturada a Sana
1,526 2.6 1502 0.00170
20
2.7 1526 0.00178
1,542
2.9 1542 0.00187
25 1,548
3.0 1548 0.00197
1,562 3.2 1562 0.00206

30 Σ(d) 30.0 Σ(d/Vs) 0.02236
*d: Espesor
Clasificación del Sitio (IBC, 2012) Clasificación del Sitio (E.030- 2016) *Vs30
1342
Tipo de Suelo Nombre del Suelo Clasificación Perfil del Suelo [m/s]
B Roca Roca o suelo muy rígido S1 *Vs30: Velocidad de onda de corte promedio para los
primeros 30m de profundidad
Anexo 1.2: Ensayos Geofísicos – Ensayo MASW P063-214 SHOUGANG

5851-CB-110"
MASW-02

400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 1.1 954 0.00112
0 954 1.2 967 0.00128
967
Roca Fracturada 1021 1.4 1021 0.00137
5 1098
1.6 1098 0.00143
1156
P: 5.2 m 1.7 1156 0.00150
1199
10 1234 1.9 1199 0.00158

Frecuencia (Hz)
Profundidad [m]
1265 2.1 1234 0.00167

1280 2.2 1265 0.00176
15
Roca ligeramente 1287 2.4 1280 0.00187
fracturada a Sana
1294 2.6 1287 0.00198
20
2.7 1294 0.00210
1308
2.9 1308 0.00221
25 1333 3.0 1333 0.00229
3.2 1372 0.00234
1372
30 Σ(d) 30.0 Σ(d/Vs) 0.02450
*d: Espesor
1225

5851-CB-110"
MASW-03

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 1.1 1293 0.00083
0 1293 1.2 1328 0.00093
Roca ligeramente 1328
fracturada a Sana
1454 1.4 1454 0.00096
1530
5 P: 3.7 m 1.6 1530 0.00102
1573
1588 1.7 1573 0.00110
10 1603 1.9 1588 0.00119

Frecuencia (Hz)
Profundidad [m]
1617 2.1 1603 0.00129

Roca Sana
1632 2.2 1617 0.00138
15
1641 2.4 1632 0.00146
1652
2.6 1641 0.00156
20
2.7 1652 0.00165
1661
2.9 1661 0.00174
25 1681 3.0 1681 0.00181
3.2 1693 0.00190
1693
30 Σ(d) 30.0 Σ(d/Vs) 0.01882
*d: Espesor
1594
A Roca muy Dura Roca Dura S0 *Vs30: Velocidad de onda de corte promedio para los

5851-CB-110"
MASW-04

200 300 400 500 600 700 800 1.1 402 0.00266
0 402 1.2 421 0.00294
421 Materiales de consistencia
452 media o compacidad 1.4 452 0.00310
medianamente densa
471
5 P: 3.7 m 1.6 471 0.00332
485
500 1.7 485 0.00357
10 502 1.9 500 0.00379

Frecuencia (Hz)
Profundidad [m]
529 2.1 502 0.00410

556 2.2 529 0.00421
15
589 2.4 556 0.00430
Materiales de consistencia
firme o compacidad 602 2.6 589 0.00434
20 densa/Roca blanda
2.7 602 0.00452
616
2.9 616 0.00468
25 630 3.0 630 0.00484
3.2 641 0.00501
641
30 Σ(d) 30.0 Σ(d/Vs) 0.05539
*d: Espesor
542
C Suelo muy Denso o Roca Blanda Roca o suelo muy rígido S1 *Vs30: Velocidad de onda de corte promedio para los

5851-CB-110"
MASW-05

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1.1 384 0.00279
0 384 1.2 410 0.00302
410 Materiales de
475 consistencia firme o 1.4 475 0.00295
555 compacidad densa/Roca
5 blanda 1.6 555 0.00282
675
768 1.7 675 0.00256
10 P: 8.9 m 831 1.9 768 0.00247

Frecuencia (Hz)
Profundidad [m]
897 2.1 831 0.00248

941 2.2 897 0.00248
15
2.4 941 0.00254
968
Materiales de
2.6 968 0.00264
20 968
consistencia muy firme o
compacidad muy
2.7 968 0.00281
densa/Roca ligeramente 969
fracturada
2.9 969 0.00298
25 978 3.0 978 0.00312
3.2 1000 0.00322
1,000
30 Σ(d) 30.0 Σ(d/Vs) 0.03888
*d: Espesor
772

5851-CB-110"
MASW-06

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 1.1 322 0.00333
0 322 1.2 314 0.00394
314
307 1.4 307 0.00457
306
5 1.6 306 0.00512
314
Materiales de 325 1.7 314 0.00552
consistencia media
10 o compacidad 331 1.9 325 0.00583
Frecuencia (Hz)
Profundidad [m]
medianamente
densa 343 2.1 331 0.00623
352 2.2 343 0.00649
15
P: 15.5 m 385 2.4 352 0.00679
394 2.6 385 0.00663

20
2.7 394 0.00691
Materiales de 413
consistencia firme o 2.9 413 0.00699
25 compacidad densa/Roca
420 3.0 420 0.00725
blanda
3.2 427 0.00753
427
30 Σ(d) 30.0 Σ(d/Vs) 0.08312
*d: Espesor
361
C Suelo muy Denso o Roca Blanda Suelos Intermedios S2 *Vs30: Velocidad de onda de corte promedio para los

5851-CB-110"
MASW-07

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 1.1 226 0.00474
0 226 1.2 229 0.00540
229 Materiales de
233 consistencia media o 1.4 233 0.00602
245 compacidad
5 medianamente densa 1.6 245 0.00640
264
286 1.7 264 0.00656
10 303 1.9 286 0.00662

Frecuencia (Hz)
Profundidad [m]
326 2.1 303 0.00681

340 2.2 326 0.00682
15
P: 15.5 m 377 2.4 340 0.00703
395
2.6 377 0.00678
20
2.7 395 0.00688
431
Materiales de consistencia 2.9 431 0.00669
25 firme o compacidad
densa/Roca blanda 440 3.0 440 0.00694
3.2 448 0.00717
448
30 Σ(d) 30.0 Σ(d/Vs) 0.09085
*d: Espesor
330
D Suelo Rígido Suelos Intermedios S2 *Vs30: Velocidad de onda de corte promedio para los

5851-CB-110"
MASW-08

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 1.1 301 0.00356
0 301 1.2 299 0.00414
299 Materiales de
295 compacidad
318
354 1.7 318 0.00544
10 P: 8.9 m 377 1.9 354 0.00536

Frecuencia (Hz)
Profundidad [m]
404 2.1 377 0.00547

415 2.2 404 0.00551
15
439 2.4 415 0.00576
458
2.6 439 0.00582
20
2.7 458 0.00594
Materiales de consistencia 465
2.9 465 0.00620
firme o compacidad
25 densa/Roca blanda 474 3.0 474 0.00644
3.2 481 0.00668
481
30 Σ(d) 30.0 Σ(d/Vs) 0.07654
*d: Espesor
392

5851-CB-110"
MASW-09

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 1.1 250 0.00428
0 250 1.2 265 0.00466
265
Materiales de
331 compacidad
360
P: 7.0 m 390 1.7 360 0.00481
10 412 1.9 390 0.00486

Frecuencia (Hz)
Profundidad [m]
430 2.1 412 0.00501

460 2.2 430 0.00518
15
488 2.4 460 0.00520
firme o compacidad
524
2.6 488 0.00523
20 densa/Roca blanda
2.7 524 0.00519
558
2.9 558 0.00517
25 568 3.0 568 0.00537
579 3.2 579 0.00555

30 Σ(d) 30.0 Σ(d/Vs) 0.07004
*d: Espesor
428

Transferencia TT2-7
5851-CB-110"
MASW-01'
Ubicación: San Nicolas - Marcona Sistema de coordenadas: UTM-WGS84-18S Realizado: M.P.J

400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 1.1 672 0.00159
0 672 1.2 687 0.00180
687 Suelo muy Denso/Roca
728 1.4 728 0.00193
Fracturada
785
5 1.6 785 0.00200
916
P: 5.2 m
1047 1.7 916 0.00189
10 1128 1.9 1047 0.00181

Frecuencia (Hz)
Profundidad [m]
1235 2.1 1128 0.00183

1310 2.2 1235 0.00180
15
Roca ligeramente
fracturada a Sana 1363 2.4 1310 0.00182
1388 2.6 1363 0.00187

20
2.7 1388 0.00196
1406
2.9 1406 0.00205
25 1427 3.0 1427 0.00214
3.2 1457 0.00221
1457
30 Σ(d) 30.0 Σ(d/Vs) 0.02670
*d: Espesor
1124

5851-CB-110"
MASW-02'

400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 1.1 911 0.00118
0 911 1.2 926 0.00133
Roca 926
Fracturada 1,017 1.4 1017 0.00138
1,176
5 P: 3.7 m 1,237 1.6 1176 0.00133
1,290 1.7 1237 0.00140
10 1,328 1.9 1290 0.00147

Frecuencia (Hz)
Profundidad [m]
1,353 2.1 1328 0.00155

Roca ligeramente 1,377 2.2 1353 0.00165
15
fracturada a Sana
1,400 2.4 1377 0.00174
2.6 1400 0.00182
20 1,425
2.7 1425 0.00191
1,452
2.9 1452 0.00199
25 1.466 3.0 1466 0.00208
3.2 1475 0.00218
1,475
30 Σ(d) 30.0 Σ(d/Vs) 0.02300
*d: Espesor
1304

5851-CB-110"
MASW-03'

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1.1 474 0.00226
0 474 1.2 488 0.00254
488 Materiales de
516 compacidad
5 P: 3.7 m
medianamente 1.6 516 0.00304
550
densa
605 1.7 550 0.00315
10 647 1.9 605 0.00314

Frecuencia (Hz)
Profundidad [m]
676 2.1 647 0.00318

706 2.2 676 0.00329
15
735 2.4 706 0.00339
firme o compacidad 2.6 735 0.00347
densa/Roca blanda
763
20
2.7 763 0.00356
786
2.9 786 0.00367
25 804 3.0 804 0.00379
3.2 815 0.00394
815
30 Σ(d) 30.0 Σ(d/Vs) 0.04527
*d: Espesor
663
C Suelo muy Denso o Roca Blanda Roca o suelo muy rígido S1 *Vs30: Velocidad de onda de corte promedio para los

5851-CB-110"
MASW-04'

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 1.1 240 0.00447
0 240
1.2 272 0.00455
272 Materiales de
compacidad
387
P: 5.2 m 428
458 1.7 428 0.00405
10 483 1.9 458 0.00414

Frecuencia (Hz)
Profundidad [m]
501 2.1 483 0.00427

518 2.2 501 0.00444
15
firme o compacidad 534 2.4 518 0.00461
densa/Roca blanda
555 2.6 534 0.00479
20
2.7 555 0.00490
568
2.9 568 0.00508
25 572 3.0 572 0.00533
578 3.2 578 0.00556

30 Σ(d) 30.0 Σ(d/Vs) 0.06440
*d: Espesor
466

Anexo 2.0 – Registro Geológico-Geotécnico
Anexo 2.1 – Registro Geológico-Geotécnico –
Calicatas
REGISTRO DE SONDAJE
Estudio : P063‐214 SHOUGANG Prof. Total (m) 1.40
Solicitado : SHOUGANG HIERRO PERU N.F. (m) : N.P.
: ESTUDIO GEOTÉCNICO COMPLEMENTARIO CON FINES DE CIMENTACIÓN "SISTEMAS DE FAJAS
Proyecto Responsable : H.D.
TRANSPORTADORAS 5841‐CB‐110 Y 5851‐CB‐110"
Ubicación : SAN NICOLAS ‐ MARCONA
Fecha : Noviembre 2017
CALICATA C‐01
Identificación Ensayos de Ensayos de
de La Muestra Laboratorio Campo
Descripción del estrato
Prof. Espesor Nombre Clasif. Símb. D.N.
H.N. %
(m) (m) Muestra SUCS Gráfi. g/cm
0.00
Suelo residual proveniente de la meteorización in situ del macizo rocoso. Suelo conformado por
0.20 S/M GP ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ grava pobremente gradada con arena, de color gris a beige claro, medianamente denso, seco.
0.20
0.40
Estrato conformado por fragmentos de roca de forma angulosa provenientes de la excavación mecánica del
0.5 S/M GP ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ macizo rocoso con arena, de color gris claro a parduzco, denso a muy denso, seco.
0.60
0.80
1.00 Estrato conformado por fragmentos de roca fracturada provenientes de la excavación mecánica
0.7 S/M GP ‐ ‐ del macizo rocoso, de forma angulosa, de TM=6", de color gris claro verdoso a parduzco, muy
denso, seco. Macizo rocoso metereorizado.
1.20
1.40
Observación: A 1.40 m de profundidad se evidenció
gran resistencia del macizo rocoso a ser excavado
por la excavadora mecánica.
Jr. Los Chasquis 2164, Los Olivos, Lima, Perú ‐ Teléfono 651‐1850 ‐ email:zer@zergeosystem.pe
REGISTRO DE SONDAJE
CALICATA C‐02
H.N. %
0.00
Suelo residual proveniente de la meteorización in situ del macizo rocoso. Suelo conformado por
0.20 S/M GP ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ grava pobremente gradada de forma angulosa con arena, de color gris a beige claro,
medianamente denso, seco.
0.20
0.40
Estrato conformado por fragmentos de roca de forma angulosa provenientes de la excavación mecánica del
0.60 0.8 S/M GP ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ macizo rocoso con arena, de color gris claro brilloso a parduzco., denso a muy denso, seco.
0.80
1.00
Estrato conformado por fragmentos de roca fracturada provenientes de la excavación mecánica
0.3 S/M GP ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ del macizo rocoso, de forma angulosa, de TM=4", de color gris claro a parduzco, muy denso,
1.20 seco. Macizo rocoso metereorizado.
por la excavadora mecánica.
REGISTRO DE SONDAJE
CALICATA C‐03
H.N. %
0.00
0.20 Suelo residual proveniente de la meteorización in situ del macizo rocoso encontrado. Suelo
0.45 S/M SP ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ conformado por arena pobremente gradada con gravas angulosas, de color gris a beige claro,
medianamente denso, seco.
0.40
0.60
0.80
Estrato conformado por fragmentos de roca fracturada provenientes de la excavación mecánica del macizo
0.85 S/M GP ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ rocoso, de forma angulosa y alargada, de TM=6", de color gris claro a parduzco, muy denso, seco. Macizo rocoso
metereorizado.
1.00
1.20
Observación: Se evidenció gran resistencia del
macizo rocoso a ser excavado por la excavadora
mecánica.
REGISTRO DE SONDAJE
Estudio : P063-214 SHOUGANG Prof. Total (m) 2.70
TRANSPORTADORAS 5841-CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110"
Ubicación : SAN NICOLAS - MARCONA
CALICATA C-04
H.N. %
0.00
Arena fina con limos de procedencia eólica, de color gris oscuro a beige, de compacidad suelta,
0.30 S/M SP-SM --- ---
seco.
0.50
1.00
Arena pobremente gradada con limos y gravas de forma sub-redondeada y presencia de

conchas desmenuzadas en gran proporción, de color gris claro a beige, seco y de compacidad
2.3 M-03 SP-SM --- --- medianamente densa. Se observó lentes de caliche de a lo largo de este estrato, de compacidad
1.50 densa y ofrece moderada resistencia a la excavación mecánica.
La granulometría presenta: Grava=20.9%, Arena=67.4% y Finos=11.7%.
2.00
2.50
Arena limosa con gravas aisladas, compacidad densa a muy densa, color beige claro, seco. Ofrece gran
0.1 S/M SM --- --- resistencia a la excavación mecánica.
Observación: Estrato de arena limosa muy difícil a la

excavación mecánica.
Jr. Los Chasquis 2164, Los Olivos, Lima, Perú - Teléfono 651-1850 - email:zer@zergeosystem.pe
REGISTRO DE SONDAJE
CALICATA C‐05
H.N. %
0.00
0.25 S/M SP‐SM ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ Arena fina con limos de procedencia eólica, de color beige claro, de compacidad suelta, seco.
0.50
1.00
Arena pobremente gradada con limos y gravas de forma sub‐redondeada de TM=4" y bolonería
2.25 S/M SP‐SM ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ aislada en 5% con presencia de conchas desmenuzadas en gran proporción, de color gris claro a
beige, seco y de compacidad medianamente densa.
1.50
2.00
2.50
Grava pobremente gradada de forma subredondeada con matriz arenosa y presencia de
conchas desmenuzadas cementados con caliche, de compacidad muy densa, de color gris claro a
0.5 M‐04 GP ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
beige, seco. Este estrato ofrece una gran resistencia a la excavación mecánica.
3.00
Observación: La presencia de caliche impidió
continuar con la excavación mecánica debido a la
resistencia muy dura de este conglomerado formado
por la grava, arena y el caliche.
REGISTRO DE SONDAJE
CALICATA C‐06
H.N. %
0.00
0.20
Arena fina de procedencia eólica con presencia aislada de gravas subredondeadas y restos de
0.60 S/M SP ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ conchas marinas, de color beige a gris claro, de compacidad suelta, seco.
0.40
0.60
0.80
Grava pobremente gradada de forma subredondeada con matriz arenosa y limos, presencia de restos de
conchas marinas desmenuzadas cementados con caliche, de compacidad muy densa, de color beige con
1.00 0.8 M‐05 GP‐GM ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ manchas grises y de baja humedad. Presencia de bolonería sub‐redondeada de T.M=6" en 10%. Este estrato
ofrece una gran resistencia a la excavación mecánica.
1.20
1.40
Observación: La presencia de caliche impidió
continuar con la excavación mecánica debido a la
resistencia muy dura de este conglomerado formado
por la grava, arena y el caliche.
REGISTRO DE SONDAJE
CALICATA C‐07
H.N. %
0.00
Relleno ligeramente contaminado con restos de maderas, conformado por arena pobremente
0.60 S/M GP ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ gradada con gravas aisladas, compacidad suelta, color beige claro a gris, seco.
0.50
Arena fina de procedencia eólica con presencia de restos de conchas marinas y gravas aisladas
0.5 S/M SP ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
subredondeadas, compacidad suelta a medianamente densa, color beige claro, seco.
1.00
Lente conformado por material fino de color gris oscuro a negro, seco y de compacidad
0.4 S/M SM ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
medianamente densa.
1.50
Grava pobremente gradada de forma subredondeada con arena y limos, presencia de restos de
2.00 1 S/M GP‐GM ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ conchas marinas, compacidad densa a muy denso, color gris claro a beige, seca. Presencia
aislada de caliche cementado con arena y grava a lo largo del estrato.
2.50
3.00
3.50 Arena limosa con presencia aislada de restos de conchas cementados con sales, color beige
2.2 S/M SM ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
claro, baja humedad y de compacidad densa a muy densa. Muy difícil a la excavación mecánica.
4.00
4.50
Observación: Se excavó hasta el alcance máximo del
brazo de la pala mecánica.
REGISTRO DE SONDAJE
CALICATA C‐08
H.N. %
0.00
Arena fina de procedencia eólica con presencia de restos de conchas marinas, compacidad
0.60 S/M SP ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ suelta, color gris a beige claro, seco.
0.50
1.00
Grava pobremente gradada de forma subredondeada con matriz arenosa y presencia de restos
1.50
1.9 S/M GP ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ de conchas marinas en gran proporción, compacidad medianamente densa, color gris claro a
beige, seca. Presencia de bolonería aislada de forma redondeada de TM=4".
2.00
2.50
Limo arenoso de baja plasticidad, color beige claro, compacidad densa a muy densa, ligeramente
0.9 M‐06 ML ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ húmedo. Muy di cil a la excavación mecánica.
3.00
Observación: Estrato limo arenoso muy difícil a la
excavación mecánica. Formación Pisco
REGISTRO DE SONDAJE
CALICATA C‐09
H.N. %
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
Relleno masivo conformado por gravas angulosas de TM=6" con matriz arenosa y limos, seco,
0.80 1.60 S/M GP ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ color beige claro.
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
Macizo rocoso metereorizado de color gris claro con manchas beige con gran resistencia a la excavación
0.1 S/M ROCA ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ mecánica.
mecanicamente.
REGISTRO DE SONDAJE
CALICATA C‐10
H.N. %
0.00
Arena fina con limos de procedencia eólica y gravas con restos de conchas marinas aisladas, de
0.20 0.40 S/M SP‐SM ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ color gris claro a beige, de compacidad suelta, seco.
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
Grava pobremente gradada de forma subredondeada con matriz arenosa y presencia de
1.4 S/M GP ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ conchas desmenuzadas cementados con caliche de forma aislada, compacidad densa, color gris
claro a parduzco, seco. Presencia aislada de bolonería de TM=6".
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
Limo de baja plasticidad con arena, color beige claro, compacidad densa a muy densa con baja humedad. Muy difícil a la
0.1 M‐08 ML ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ excavación mecánica. La granulometría presenta: Grava=0.0%, Arena=24.1% y Finos=75.9%.
Observación: Arena limo arcillosa muy difícil a la
excavación mecánica debido a la presencia de
agentes cementantes. Formación Pisco
REGISTRO DE SONDAJE
CALICATA C‐11
H.N. %
0.00
0.10
0.20 0.40 S/M SP‐SM ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ Arena pobremente gradada con limo, color beige claro amarilento, compacidad suelta, seco.
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
Grava pobremente gradada de forma subredondeada con arena y presencia de conchas
desmenuzadas en gran proporción, compacidad medianamente densa, color gris claro a
0.5 S/M GP ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐
parduzco, seco. Se encontró el macizo rocoso metereorizado de color gris claro con manchas
beige con gran resistencia a la excavación mecánica.
0.70
0.80
0.90
Observación: Se observó afloramiento de roca en el
fondo de la excavación la cual presenta gran
resistencia a la excavación mecánica.
Ensayo DPL
REGISTRO DE SONDAJE - DPL 01
Estudio : P063-214 SHOUGANG Profundidad : 1.0 m

Solicitante : SHOUGANG HIERRO PERU Nivel freático : N.P.
Proyecto : ESTUDIO GEOTÉCNICO COMPLEMENTARIO CON FINES DE CIMENTACIÓN Cota :
"SISTEMAS DE FAJAS TRANSPORTADORAS 5841-CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110" Ubicación : E: 4767689
N: 8313441
Ubicación : SAN NICOLAS - MARCONA Técnico : H.D.C.G
Fecha : Noviembre, 2017 Responsable : H.D.C.G
Prof. Golpes Gráfico Número de Golpes vs Clasific.

Descripción del Suelo
(m) (No) Profundidad SUCS
N° de golpes / 10 cm
0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0.0
0.1 11
0.2 11
0.3 18
0.4 14
0.5 20
0.5
0.6 22
0.7 43
0.8 78
0.9 100
1.0 100 1.0
Observaciones:

N: 8313395

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0.0 0.0
0.1 23
0.2 25
0.3 28
0.4 29
0.5 39 0.5
0.6 70
Observaciones:

N: 8313344

0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0.0
0.1 20
0.2 25
0.3 30
0.4 64
0.5 70
0.5
0.6 100
0.7 95
0.8 100
Observaciones:

N: 8313268

0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0.0
0.1 16
0.2 22
0.3 17
0.4 20
0.5 67
0.5
0.6 90
0.7 53
0.8 37
0.9 55
1.0 45
1.0
1.1 42
1.2 73
1.3 100
Observaciones:

N: 8313113

0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0.0
0.1 3
0.2 4
0.3 4
0.4 7
0.5 6
0.5
0.6 40
0.7 80
0.8 100
Observaciones:

N: 8312868

0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0.0
0.1 10
0.2 32
0.3 17
0.4 17
0.5 19 0.5
0.6 22
0.7 13
0.8 7
0.9 16
1.0 10 1.0
1.1 7
1.2 7
1.3 9
1.4 10
1.5 16 1.5
1.6 30
1.7 34
1.8 30
1.9 46
2.0 27 2.0
2.1 23
2.2 30
2.3 43
2.4 47
2.5 78 2.5
2.6 100
Observaciones:

N: 8312683

0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0.0
0.1 30
0.2 49
0.3 53
0.4 60
Observaciones:

N: 8312502

0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0.0
0.1 24
0.2 21
0.3 18
0.4 24
0.5 22
0.5
0.6 50
0.7 89
0.8 90
0.9 100
Observaciones:

N: 8312173

0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0.0
0.1 21
0.2 18
0.3 20
0.4 51
0.5 75
0.5
0.6 80
Observaciones:

N: 8312187

0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0.0
0.1 2
0.2 6
0.3 50
0.4 100
Observaciones:

N: 8312239

0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0.0
0.1 3
0.2 16
0.3 35
0.4 38
0.5 100
0.5
Observaciones:

N: 8312293

0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0.0
0.1 5
0.2 11
0.3 50
0.4 70
0.5
1.0
Observaciones:

N: 8312344

0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0.0
0.1 12
0.2 34
0.3 100
0.4 70
0.5 68 0.5
0.6 100
Observaciones:

N: 8312480

0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0.0
0.1 2
0.2 11
0.3 13
0.4 5
0.5 15
0.5
0.6 50
0.7 100
Observaciones:
Trinchera
REGISTRO DE SONDAJE
TRINCHERA T-01
H.N. %
0.00
Material suelto con presencia de gravas subredondeadas, compacidad suelta, color gris a beige
0.20 0.40 S/M R --- ---
claro, seco.
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
Limo arenoso de baja plasticidad, color beige claro a pardo, de consistencia dura, seco. Presenta intercalaciones
1.5 M-09 ML --- --- de material fino de color gris claro a blanco.
1.20 La granulometría presenta: Grava=0.0%, Arena= 2.8% y Finos=97.2%.
1.40
1.60
1.80
Afloramiento de la Formación Pisco.
REGISTRO DE SONDAJE
TRINCHERA T-02
H.N. %
0.00
0.50
Material granular con presencia de gravas subredondeadas, compacidad suelta a medianamente

1.50 S/M GP --- ---
densa, color gris rojizo, seco.
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
Arena limo arcillosa de compacidad dura, color beige claro, seco. El depósito sedimentario se presenta en forma
3.00 3 M-10 SC-SM --- --- laminada.
La granulometría presenta: Grava=1.0%, Arena= 63.5% y Finos=35.5%.
3.50
4.00
4.50
Afloramiento de la Formación Pisco.
Estaciones Geomecánicas
CLASIFICACIÓN GEOMECÁNICAS DE BIENIAWSKI - RMR
PROYECTO : ESTUDIO GEOTÉCNICO COMPLEMENTARIO CON FINES DE CIMENTACIÓN“SISTEMA DE FAJAS TRANSPORTADORAS 5841-CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
SOLICITA : SHOUGANG HIERRO PERU S.A.A. UBICACION : San Nicolás, Distrito de Marcona, Provincia de Nazca y Departamento de Ica.
ZONA : ESTACIÓN GEOMECÁNICA - 01 FECHA : Noviembre, 2017 COORDENADAS: 476444 m E 8312104 m N
ORIENTACION DE LA CARA TRAMO

ESTACION VALORACION DEL MACIZO ROCOSO (R.M.R.)
RUMBO BUZAMIENTO DESDE HASTA
EG - 01 VALORACI
PARAMETRO RANGO DE VALORES
TIPO DE ROCA FRECUENCIA FRACTURA ON
A % B % N° Fract. / ml. R. COMPRE. UNIAXIAL (MPa) >250 (15) 100-250 (12) 50-100 (7) x 25-50 (4) <25(2) <5(1) <1(0) 1 7
MONZOGRANITO RQD % 90-100 (20) 75-90 (17) 50-75 (13) x 25-50 (8) <25 (3) 2 13
TIPO ORIENTACION RELLENO ESPACIAMIENTO (m) >2 (20) 0,6-2 (15) 0.2-0.6 (10) 0.06-0.2 (8) x < 0.06 (5) 3 8
ESPACIAMIENTO COMENTARIOS
ESTRUCTURA RUMBO(º) BUZAMIENTO (º) TIPO ESPESOR PERSISTENCIA <1m long. (6) 1-3 m Long. (4) 3-10m (2) 10-20 m (1) x > 20 m (0) 4A 1
JUNTA N 162° 54°SO CONDICION ABERTURA Cerrada (6) <0.1mm apert. (5) 0.1-1.0mm (4) x 1 - 5 mm (1) > 5 mm (0) 4B 4
DE RUGOSIDAD Muy rugosa (6) Rugosa (5) x Lig.rugosa (3) Lisa (1) Espejo de falla (0) 4C 5
JUNTAS RELLENO Limpia (6) x Duro < 5mm (4) Duro> 5mm (2) Suave < 5 mm (1) Suave > 5 mm (0) 4D 6
ALTERACION Sana (6) Lig. Alterada. (5) Mod.Alterada. (3) x Muy Alterada. (2) Descompuesta (0) 4E 3
AGUA SUBTERRANEA Seco (15) x Humedo (10) Mojado (7) Goteo (4) Flujo (0) 5 15
VALOR TOTAL RMR (suma de valoracion de 1 al 5 ) 62
CLASE DE MACIZO ROCOSO
RMR 100 - 81 80 - 61 60 - 41 40 - 21 20 - 0 II
DESCRIPCION I MUY BUENA II BUENA III REGULAR IV MALA V MUY MALA
INDICE DE RESISTENCIA RANGO RESIS. TIPO DE ROCA

GRADO
IDENTIFICACION DE CAMPO COMP. Mpa Mz Monzonita
R1 Deleznable con golpes firmes con la punta de martillo de geólogo se Gr Granito
1,0 - 5,0
desconcha con una cuchilla Ca Caliza
R2 Se desconcha con dificultad con cuchilla. Marcas poco profundas en Vo Andesita porfiritica
5 - 25
la roca con golpe firme del martillo (de punta) Ar Arenisca
Vo Pórfido Riolítico
R3 No se raya ni desconcha con cuchillo. La muestra se rompe con golpe firme del martillo 25 - 50
R4 La muestra se rompe con mas de un golpe del martillo 50 - 100

R5 Se requiere varios golpes de martillo para romper la muestra 100 - 250
R6 Solo se rompe esquirlas de la muestra con el martillo > 250 TIPO DE ESTRUCTURA
J JUNTAS
F FALLA
V VETA
INDICE DE ALTERACION E ESTRATO
GRADO
DESCRIPCION V VENILLA
Ningún signo de alteración en el material rocoso. Quizás lig. decoloración sobre Gt GRIETAS
I SANA
superficies de discontinuidades principales FOTOGRAFIA DEL MACIZO ROCOSO
La decoloración indica alteración. del material rocoso y superf. de disc. El material
II LIGERO
rocoso descolorido extremadamente es más débil que en su condición sana. ESPACIAMIENTO COMENTARIOS ADICIONALES
Menos de la mitad del mat. rocoso esta descomp. y/o desintegrado a un suelo la 1 >2m
III MODERADA
roca sana o decolorada se presenta como un marco continuo o como núcleo rocoso. 2 0.6 - 2 m
Roca Ígnea intrusiva tipo
Mas de la mitad del mat. rocoso esta descomp. y/o desintegrado a un suelo. La 3 0.2 - 0.6 m
IV MUY ALTERD.
0.06 - 0.2 m
monzogranito metamorfizado
roca sana o decolorada se presenta como un núcleo rocoso. 4
Todo el material rocoso esta descomp. y/o desintegrado a suelo. La estructura 5 < 0.06 m
V DESCOMPU.
original de la masa rocosa aun se conserva intacta.
Anexo 2.4 Cálculo RMR


EG - 02 VALORACI
ANDESITA RQD % 90-100 (20) 75-90 (17) x 50-75 (13) 25-50 (8) <25 (3) 2 17
JUNTA N 05° 65°SE CONDICION ABERTURA Cerrada (6) <0.1mm apert. (5) 0.1-1.0mm (4) x 1 - 5 mm (1) > 5 mm (0) 4B 4
JUNTAS RELLENO Limpia (6) Duro < 5mm (4) Duro> 5mm (2) x Suave < 5 mm (1) Suave > 5 mm (0) 4D 2
ALTERACION Sana (6) Lig. Alterada. (5) x Mod.Alterada. (3) Muy Alterada. (2) Descompuesta (0) 4E 3
RMR 100 - 81 80 - 61 60 - 41 40 - 21 20 - 0 II

GRADO
1,0 - 5,0
5 - 25

J JUNTAS
F FALLA
V VETA
GRADO
I SANA
II LIGERO
III MODERADA
Mas de la mitad del mat. rocoso esta descomp. y/o desintegrado a un suelo. La 3 0.2 - 0.6 m Dique andesítico
IV MUY ALTERD.
roca sana o decolorada se presenta como un núcleo rocoso. 4 0.06 - 0.2 m
V DESCOMPU.


EG - 03 VALORACI
MONZOGRANITO RQD % 90-100 (20) 75-90 (17) x 50-75 (13) 25-50 (8) <25 (3) 2 17
JUNTA N 168° 54°SE CONDICION ABERTURA Cerrada (6) <0.1mm apert. (5) 0.1-1.0mm (4) 1 - 5 mm (1) x > 5 mm (0) 4B 1
JUNTAS RELLENO Limpia (6) Duro < 5mm (4) Duro> 5mm (2) Suave < 5 mm (1) x Suave > 5 mm (0) 4D 1
ALTERACION Sana (6) Lig. Alterada. (5) Mod.Alterada. (3) Muy Alterada. (2) x Descompuesta (0) 4E 2
RMR 100 - 81 80 - 61 60 - 41 40 - 21 20 - 0 III

GRADO
1,0 - 5,0
5 - 25

J JUNTAS
F FALLA
V VETA
GRADO
I SANA
II LIGERO
III MODERADA
Roca Ígnea intrusiva tipo
Mas de la mitad del mat. rocoso esta descomp. y/o desintegrado a un suelo. La 3 0.2 - 0.6 m
IV MUY ALTERD.
0.06 - 0.2 m
monzogranito alterado
roca sana o decolorada se presenta como un núcleo rocoso. 4
V DESCOMPU.


EG - 04 VALORACI
A % B % N° Fract. / ml. R. COMPRE. UNIAXIAL (MPa) >250 (15) 100-250 (12) 50-100 (7) 25-50 (4) x <25(2) <5(1) <1(0) 1 4
ARENISCA RQD % 90-100 (20) 75-90 (17) 50-75 (13) 25-50 (8) <25 (3) X 2 3
ESTRUCTURA RUMBO(º) BUZAMIENTO (º) TIPO ESPESOR PERSISTENCIA <1m long. (6) 1-3 m Long. (4) 3-10m (2) 10-20 m (1) > 20 m (0) X 4A -
ESTRATO - - CONDICION ABERTURA Cerrada (6) <0.1mm apert. (5) 0.1-1.0mm (4) x 1 - 5 mm (1) > 5 mm (0) 4B 4
ALTERACION Sana (6) Lig. Alterada. (5) Mod.Alterada. (3) x Muy Alterada. (2) Descompuesta (0) 4E 3
RMR 100 - 81 80 - 61 60 - 41 40 - 21 20 - 0 IV

GRADO
1,0 - 5,0
5 - 25

J JUNTAS
F FALLA
V VETA
GRADO
I SANA
II LIGERO
III MODERADA
Mas de la mitad del mat. rocoso esta descomp. y/o desintegrado a un suelo. La 3 0.2 - 0.6 m Arenisca intercalada con limoarcillita
IV MUY ALTERD.
V DESCOMPU.


EG - 05 VALORACI
A % B % N° Fract. / ml. R. COMPRE. UNIAXIAL (MPa) >250 (15) 100-250 (12) 50-100 (7) 25-50 (4) x <25(2) <5(1) <1(0) 1 4
LIMO ARCILLITAS RQD % 90-100 (20) 75-90 (17) 50-75 (13) 25-50 (8) x <25 (3) 2 8
ESTRUCTURA RUMBO(º) BUZAMIENTO (º) TIPO ESPESOR PERSISTENCIA <1m long. (6) 1-3 m Long. (4) 3-10m (2) 10-20 m (1) > 20 m (0) X 4A 0
ESTRATO N 140° 16°NE CONDICION ABERTURA Cerrada (6) <0.1mm apert. (5) 0.1-1.0mm (4) x 1 - 5 mm (1) > 5 mm (0) 4B 4
ALTERACION Sana (6) Lig. Alterada. (5) Mod.Alterada. (3) Muy Alterada. (2) x Descompuesta (0) 4E 2
RMR 100 - 81 80 - 61 60 - 41 40 - 21 20 - 0 III

GRADO
1,0 - 5,0
5 - 25
la roca con golpe firme del martillo (de punta) Li Limo Arcillita

J JUNTAS
F FALLA
V VETA
GRADO
I SANA
II LIGERO
III MODERADA
Mas de la mitad del mat. rocoso esta descomp. y/o desintegrado a un suelo. La 3 0.2 - 0.6 m Limo arcillita intemperizada
IV MUY ALTERD.
V DESCOMPU.

Anexo 3.0 – Ensayos de Laboratorio
Anexo 3.1 – Ensayos de Laboratorio - Ensayos
Estándar
Código : LGG-P-01-G1-F5-S
REGISTRO
Revisión : 2
Aprobado : CC-LGG
INFORME DE RESULTADO DE
LABORATORIO GEOTÉCNICO
ENSAYOS Fecha : 03/11/2017
ENSAYOS ESTÁNDAR DE CLASIFICACIÓN

N° De Informe : LGG17-180-130
Solicitante : Zer Geosytem Perú S.A.C.
Proyecto : Estudio Geotécnico complementario con fines de cimentación "Sistema de fajas transportadoras
5841-CB-110 y 5851-CB-110"
Ubicación : San Nicolás - Marcona - Ica
Sondeo : C-04 Fecha de Recepción : 27/10/2017
Muestra : M-3 Fecha de Ejecución : 02/11/2017
Profundidad (m) : 2.50-2.60 Fecha de Emisión : 03/11/2017
Granulometría por Tamizado (ASTM - D422)

% Acum.
N° Malla Abertura (mm) Contenido de Humedad (ASTM-D2216 )
que pasa
3" 76.200 100.0 Humedad % 1.55
2" 50.800 100.0
1 1/2 " 38.100 100.0
1" 25.400 92.1
Límites de Consistencia (ASTM - D4318)
3/4" 19.100 87.4
3/8" 9.520 82.2 Límite Líquido ( LL ) -
Nº 4 4.760 79.1 Límite Plástico ( LP ) NP
Nº 10 2.000 70.3 Índice Plástico ( IP ) NP
Nº 20 0.840 61.9
Nº 40 0.425 51.6
Nº 60 0.250 40.3
Clasificación S.U.C.S. (ASTM-D2487 ) SP - SM
Nº 140 0.106 11.9
Nº 200 0.075 11.7
Clasificación AASHTO ( ASTM-D3282 ) A-2-4
Resultados de la granulometría por tamizado Índice de Grupo 0

Grava [ Nº 4 < φ < 3" ] % 20.9 Arena pobremente gradada con
Nombre de grupo :
Arena [ Nº 200 < φ < Nº 4 ] % 67.4 limo y grava
Finos [ < Nº 200] % 11.7
CURVA GRANULOMÉTRICA
Gravas Arenas Finos
Gruesa Fina Gruesa Media Fina Limos y arcillas
----
3" 2" 1 1/2" 1" 3/4" 3/8"
---- N°4 N°10 N°20 N°40 N°60 N°140 N°200
100
90
80
% acumulado que pasa
70
60
50
40
C-04/M-3
30
20
10
0
100.00 10.00 1.00 0.10 0.01
Diámetro de las partículas (mm)
Observaciones: El peso de la muestra cumple con lo especificado en la Norma

----
----
Elaborado por Revisado y aprobado por
Téc. Julio Chávez

Dr. Ing. Zenón Aguilar B.
CIP: 040684
Gerente General
Jr. LOS CHASQUIS 2164 - Urb. EL TREBOL - LOS OLIVOS - LIMA - PERÚ
TELF:(051) 6823088 - 6823112 E-Mail : laboratorio@geofrontier.pe
REGISTRO
Revisión : 2
Aprobado : CC-LGG

5841-CB-110 y 5851-CB-110"

% Acum.
que pasa
3" 76.200 100.0 Humedad % 4.75
2" 50.800 100.0
1 1/2 " 38.100 89.7
1" 25.400 75.8
3/4" 19.100 61.3
Nº 20 0.840 24.9
Nº 40 0.425 17.2
Nº 60 0.250 12.1
Clasificación S.U.C.S. (ASTM-D2487 ) GP
Nº 140 0.106 1.8
Nº 200 0.075 1.3
Clasificación AASHTO ( ASTM-D3282 ) A-1-a

Grava [ Nº 4 < φ < 3" ] % 64.2 Grava pobremente gradada con
Nombre de grupo :
Arena [ Nº 200 < φ < Nº 4 ] % 34.5 arena
Finos [ < Nº 200] % 1.3
Gravas Arenas Finos
----
3" 2" 1 1/2" 1" 3/4" 3/8"
---- N°4 N°10 N°20 N°40 N°60 N°140 N°200
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
C-05/M-4
30
20
10
0
100.00 10.00 1.00 0.10 0.01

----
----
Téc. Julio Chávez

CIP: 040684
Gerente General
REGISTRO
Revisión : 2
Aprobado : CC-LGG

5841-CB-110 y 5851-CB-110"

% Acum.
que pasa
3" 76.200 100.0 Humedad % 6.03
2" 50.800 100.0
1 1/2 " 38.100 100.0
1" 25.400 89.5
3/4" 19.100 82.4
Nº 20 0.840 29.9
Nº 40 0.425 24.8
Nº 60 0.250 20.3
Clasificación S.U.C.S. (ASTM-D2487 ) GP - GM
Nº 140 0.106 7.9
Nº 200 0.075 7.4
Clasificación AASHTO ( ASTM-D3282 ) A-1-a

Grava [ Nº 4 < φ < 3" ] % 51.5 Grava pobremente gradada con
Nombre de grupo :
Arena [ Nº 200 < φ < Nº 4 ] % 41.2 limo y arena
Finos [ < Nº 200] % 7.4
Gravas Arenas Finos
----
3" 2" 1 1/2" 1" 3/4" 3/8"
---- N°4 N°10 N°20 N°40 N°60 N°140 N°200
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
C-05/M-4
30
20
10
0
100.00 10.00 1.00 0.10 0.01

----
----
Téc. Julio Chávez

CIP: 040684
Gerente General
REGISTRO
Revisión : 2
Aprobado : CC-LGG

5841-CB-110 y 5851-CB-110"

% Acum.
que pasa
3" 76.200 100.0 Humedad % 10.53
2" 50.800 100.0
1 1/2 " 38.100 100.0
1" 25.400 100.0
3/4" 19.100 100.0
3/8" 9.520 98.7 Límite Líquido ( LL ) 26
Nº 4 4.760 97.8 Límite Plástico ( LP ) 23
Nº 10 2.000 96.3 Índice Plástico ( IP ) 3
Nº 20 0.840 94.2
Nº 40 0.425 92.4
Nº 60 0.250 90.4
Clasificación S.U.C.S. (ASTM-D2487 ) ML
Nº 140 0.106 70.0
Nº 200 0.075 59.7
Clasificación AASHTO ( ASTM-D3282 ) A-4

Grava [ Nº 4 < φ < 3" ] % 2.2
Nombre de grupo : Limo arenoso de baja plasticidad
Arena [ Nº 200 < φ < Nº 4 ] % 38.1
Finos [ < Nº 200] % 59.7
Gravas Arenas Finos
----
3" 2" 1 1/2" 1" 3/4" 3/8"
---- N°4 N°10 N°20 N°40 N°60 N°140 N°200
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
C-08/M-6
30
20
10
0
100.00 10.00 1.00 0.10 0.01
Observaciones: El peso de la muestra es menor al especificado en la Norma

----
----
Téc. Julio Chávez

CIP: 040684
Gerente General
REGISTRO
Revisión : 2
Aprobado : CC-LGG

5841-CB-110 y 5851-CB-110"

% Acum.
que pasa
3" 76.200 100.0 Humedad % 2.34
2" 50.800 100.0
1 1/2 " 38.100 100.0
1" 25.400 100.0
3/4" 19.100 100.0
Nº 20 0.840 99.8
Nº 40 0.425 98.7
Nº 60 0.250 96.8
Nº 140 0.106 87.4
Nº 200 0.075 75.9
Clasificación AASHTO ( ASTM-D3282 ) A-4

Grava [ Nº 4 < φ < 3" ] % 0.0
Nombre de grupo : Limo de baja plasticidad con arena
Arena [ Nº 200 < φ < Nº 4 ] % 24.1
Finos [ < Nº 200] % 75.9
Gravas Arenas Finos
----
3" 2" 1 1/2" 1" 3/4" 3/8"
---- N°4 N°10 N°20 N°40 N°60 N°140 N°200
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
C-10/M-8
30
20
10
0
100.00 10.00 1.00 0.10 0.01

----
----
Téc. Julio Chávez

CIP: 040684
Gerente General
REGISTRO
Revisión : 2
Aprobado : CC-LGG

5841-CB-110 y 5851-CB-110"
Sondeo : Trinchera 1 Fecha de Recepción : 27/10/2017
Profundidad (m) : Fecha de Emisión : 03/11/2017

% Acum.
que pasa
3" 76.200 100.0 Humedad % 6.00
2" 50.800 100.0
1 1/2 " 38.100 100.0
1" 25.400 100.0
3/4" 19.100 100.0
Nº 20 0.840 99.9
Nº 40 0.425 99.9
Nº 60 0.250 99.9
Nº 140 0.106 99.2
Nº 200 0.075 97.2
Clasificación AASHTO ( ASTM-D3282 ) -

Grava [ Nº 4 < φ < 3" ] % 0.0
Nombre de grupo : Limo arenoso
Arena [ Nº 200 < φ < Nº 4 ] % 2.8
Finos [ < Nº 200] % 97.2
Gravas Arenas Finos
----
3" 2" 1 1/2" 1" 3/4" 3/8"
---- N°4 N°10 N°20 N°40 N°60 N°140 N°200
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
Trinchera 1/M-9
30
20
10
0
100.00 10.00 1.00 0.10 0.01

----
----
Téc. Julio Chávez

CIP: 040684
Gerente General
REGISTRO
Revisión : 2
Aprobado : CC-LGG

5841-CB-110 y 5851-CB-110"
Sondeo : Trinchera 2 Fecha de Recepción : 27/10/2017
Profundidad (m) : Fecha de Emisión : 03/11/2017

% Acum.
que pasa
3" 76.200 100.0 Humedad % 20.32
2" 50.800 100.0
1 1/2 " 38.100 100.0
1" 25.400 100.0
3/4" 19.100 100.0
Nº 20 0.840 81.0
Nº 40 0.425 72.4
Nº 60 0.250 64.3
Clasificación S.U.C.S. (ASTM-D2487 ) SC - SM
Nº 140 0.106 42.6
Nº 200 0.075 35.5
Clasificación AASHTO ( ASTM-D3282 ) A-2-4

Grava [ Nº 4 < φ < 3" ] % 1.0
Nombre de grupo : Arena limo arcillosa
Arena [ Nº 200 < φ < Nº 4 ] % 63.5
Finos [ < Nº 200] % 35.5
Gravas Arenas Finos
----
3" 2" 1 1/2" 1" 3/4" 3/8"
---- N°4 N°10 N°20 N°40 N°60 N°140 N°200
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
Trinchera 2/M-10
30
20
10
0
100.00 10.00 1.00 0.10 0.01

----
----
Téc. Julio Chávez

CIP: 040684
Gerente General
Código : PLA17-004-01
REGISTRO
Revisión : 2
Fecha : 03/11/2017
INFORME DE RESULTADO DE ENSAYOS
LABORATORIO GEOTÉCNICO Página : 1 de 1
PESO VOLUMÉTRICO DEL SUELO COHESIVO

ASTM D 7263
N° de Informe LGG17-180-130
Solicitante Zer Geosytem Perú S.A.C.
Proyecto Estudio Geotécnico complementario con fines de cimentación "Sistema de fajas
transportadoras 5841-CB-110 y 5851-CB-110"
Ubicación San Nicolás - Marcona - Ica Fecha de Recepción 27/10/2017
Fecha de Ejecución 02/11/2017
Sondaje : C-8 Fecha de Emisión 03/11/2017
Muestra : M-6
Prof. (m) : 2.30-3.40
MËTODO DE LA INMERSIÓN EN AGUA
DATOS 1 2 3
Peso del Suelo (g) 125.20 270.50 128.90
Peso Suelo + parafina (g) 152.40 294.30 150.10
Vroca + parafina ( cm3 ) 93.00 155.80 85.30
Peso de la parafina ( g) 27.20 23.80 21.20
Densidad parafina ( g/cm3 ) 0.88 0.88 0.88
Volumen de la parafina ( cm3 ) 30.91 27.05 24.09
Volumen del Suelo ( cm3 ) 62.09 128.75 61.21 Promedio
Densidad del Suelo húmedo ( g/cm3 ) 2.02 2.10 2.11 2.07
Densidad del Suelo húmedo ( KN/m3 ) 19.76 20.59 20.64 20.33
Contenido de humedad natural (%) 10.53 10.53 10.53 10.53
Densidad suelo seca corregida ( g/cm3 ) 1.82 1.90 1.91 1.88
Densidad suelo seca corregida ( KN/m3 ) 17.9 18.6 18.7 18.4
Observaciones :
Realizado por Revisado y aprobado por
Téc. Julio Chávez Dr. Ing. Zenón Aguilar B.

CIP: 040684
Gerente General
REGISTRO
Revisión : 2
Fecha : 03/11/2017

ASTM D 7263
Sondaje : C-10 Fecha de Emisión 03/11/2017
Muestra : M-8
Prof. (m) : 1.80-1.90
DATOS 1 2 3
Peso del Suelo (g) 147.40 189.50 266.50
Observaciones :

CIP: 040684
Gerente General
REGISTRO
Revisión : 2
Fecha : 03/11/2017

ASTM D 7263
Sondaje : Trinchera 1 Fecha de Emisión 03/11/2017
Muestra : M-9
Prof. (m) : ---
DATOS 1 2 3
Peso del Suelo (g) 144.30 258.90 240.30
Observaciones :

CIP: 040684
Gerente General
REGISTRO
Revisión : 2
Fecha : 03/11/2017

ASTM D 7263
Sondaje : Trinchera 2 Fecha de Emisión 03/11/2017
Muestra : M-10
Prof. (m) : ---
DATOS 1 2 3
Peso del Suelo (g) 51.70 49.50 51.10
Observaciones :

CIP: 040684
Gerente General
Anexo 3.2 – Ensayos de Laboratorio - Ensayos
Especiales
Código PLA17-013-01
REGISTRO
Revisión 6
INFORME DE RESULTADO DE Fecha 30/10/2017
Laboratorio Geotécnico ENSAYOS Página 1 de 4
ENSAYO DE COMPRENSIÓN TRIAXIAL UU

(No Consolidado No Drenado (UU), ASTM D2850)
Nro Informe : LGG17-180-130
Proyecto : Estudio Geotécnico complementario con fines de cimentación "Sistema de fajas transportadoras 5841-CB-110 y 5851-
CB-110

Prof. (m) : 1.20 - 1.40 Fecha de Emisión : 13/11/2017
PRESIÓN DE CELDA = 100 kPa
Probeta 1 Condiciones Iniciales Condiciones Finales

Altura 199.8 mm 0.0 mm Estado de Muestra : Remoldeada
Diámetro 99.8 mm 129.6 mm Velocidad de Ensayo : 0.5 mm/min
Humedad 6.03 % Faltan Datos % Clasificación SUCS (Muestra Global) : GP-GM
Densidad Seca 18.00 kN/m3 Faltan Datos kN/m3 Clasificación SUCS (Muestra matriz ensayada) : GM-
Deformación F s desv p q s1 s3 Oblicuidad

q/p
(%) N kPa kPa kPa kPa kPa s 1/s 3
0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 100.0 0.00 1.00
0.10 214.37 27.39 113.70 13.70 127.39 100.0 0.12 1.27
0.20 514.61 65.69 132.85 32.85 165.69 100.0 0.25 1.66
0.30 851.30 108.56 154.28 54.28 208.56 100.0 0.35 2.09
0.40 1238.93 157.84 178.92 78.92 257.84 100.0 0.44 2.58
0.50 1500.87 191.02 195.51 95.51 291.02 100.0 0.49 2.91
1.00 2541.08 321.78 260.89 160.89 421.78 100.0 0.62 4.22
1.50 2710.96 341.56 270.78 170.78 441.56 100.0 0.63 4.42
2.00 2802.50 351.30 275.65 175.65 451.30 100.0 0.64 4.51
2.50 2864.56 357.25 278.63 178.63 457.25 100.0 0.64 4.57
3.00 2901.52 360.00 280.00 180.00 460.00 100.0 0.64 4.60
4.00 2974.21 365.22 282.61 182.61 465.22 100.0 0.65 4.65
5.00 3043.76 369.87 284.93 184.93 469.87 100.0 0.65 4.70
6.00 3092.34 371.81 285.91 185.91 471.81 100.0 0.65 4.72
7.00 3135.65 373.01 286.51 186.51 473.01 100.0 0.65 4.73
8.00 3131.99 368.57 284.28 184.28 468.57 100.0 0.65 4.69
9.00 3126.68 363.94 281.97 181.97 463.94 100.0 0.65 4.64
10.00 3083.67 354.99 277.50 177.50 454.99 100.0 0.64 4.55
11.00 3054.32 347.71 273.85 173.85 447.71 100.0 0.63 4.48
12.00 3052.80 343.63 271.81 171.81 443.63 100.0 0.63 4.44
13.00 3142.37 349.69 274.85 174.85 449.69 100.0 0.64 4.50
14.00 3180.22 349.84 274.92 174.92 449.84 100.0 0.64 4.50
15.00 3245.60 352.88 276.44 176.44 452.88 100.0 0.64 4.53
16.00 3311.32 337.19 268.59 168.59 437.19 100.0 0.63 4.37
La muestra ha sido identificada y entregada por el solicitante. Material empleado en el remoldeo menor al tamiz N° 3/4". Humedad proporcionada =6.03 %, densidad seca
proporcionada = 18.0 kN/m. Los datos de remoldeo son responsabilidades del solicitante.
Téc. Julio Chávez.

CIP: 040684
Gerente General
REGISTRO
Revisión 6

CB-110


Densidad Seca 18.00 kN/m3 Faltan Datos kN/m3 Clasificación SUCS (Muestra matriz ensayada) : GM

q/p
0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 200.00 200.0 0.00 1.00
0.10 532.10 67.79 233.89 33.89 267.79 200.0 0.14 1.34
0.20 813.29 103.51 251.75 51.75 303.51 200.0 0.21 1.52
0.30 1029.20 130.86 265.43 65.43 330.86 200.0 0.25 1.65
0.40 1245.88 158.25 279.12 79.12 358.25 200.0 0.28 1.79
0.50 1517.77 192.59 296.30 96.30 392.59 200.0 0.32 1.96
1.00 2807.15 354.41 377.20 177.20 554.41 200.0 0.47 2.77
1.50 3534.62 444.00 422.00 222.00 644.00 200.0 0.53 3.22
2.00 4109.58 513.61 456.80 256.80 713.61 200.0 0.56 3.57
2.50 4506.28 560.31 480.15 280.15 760.31 200.0 0.58 3.80
3.00 4777.42 590.98 495.49 295.49 790.98 200.0 0.60 3.95
4.00 5145.86 629.99 515.00 315.00 829.99 200.0 0.61 4.15
5.00 5372.32 650.87 525.43 325.43 850.87 200.0 0.62 4.25
6.00 5539.94 664.11 532.05 332.05 864.11 200.0 0.62 4.32
7.00 5641.79 669.12 534.56 334.56 869.12 200.0 0.63 4.35
8.00 5715.08 670.53 535.26 335.26 870.53 200.0 0.63 4.35
9.00 5796.49 672.69 536.34 336.34 872.69 200.0 0.63 4.36
10.00 5789.06 664.44 532.22 332.22 864.44 200.0 0.62 4.32
11.00 5825.26 661.17 530.58 330.58 861.17 200.0 0.62 4.31
12.00 5794.18 650.25 525.12 325.12 850.25 200.0 0.62 4.25
13.00 5701.24 632.55 516.27 316.27 832.55 200.0 0.61 4.16
14.00 5553.57 609.08 504.54 304.54 809.08 200.0 0.60 4.05
15.00 5307.63 575.34 487.67 287.67 775.34 200.0 0.59 3.88
16.00 5342.97 572.36 486.18 286.18 772.36 200.0 0.59 3.86

CIP: 040684
Gerente General
REGISTRO
Revisión 6

CB-110


Densidad Seca 18.00 kN/m3 Faltan Datos kN/m3 Clasificación SUCS (Muestra matriz ensayada) : GM

q/p
0.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 400.00 400.0 0.00 1.00
0.10 629.48 80.39 440.19 40.19 480.39 400.0 0.09 1.20
0.20 848.69 108.28 454.14 54.14 508.28 400.0 0.12 1.27
0.30 1064.97 135.73 467.87 67.87 535.73 400.0 0.15 1.34
0.40 1240.71 157.97 478.99 78.99 557.97 400.0 0.16 1.39
0.50 1713.75 217.98 508.99 108.99 617.98 400.0 0.21 1.54
1.00 4216.37 533.61 666.80 266.80 933.61 400.0 0.40 2.33
1.50 6131.90 772.11 786.06 386.06 1172.11 400.0 0.49 2.93
2.00 7136.79 894.08 847.04 447.04 1294.08 400.0 0.53 3.24
2.50 7836.82 976.77 888.39 488.39 1376.77 400.0 0.55 3.44
3.00 8352.67 1035.73 917.86 517.86 1435.73 400.0 0.56 3.59
4.00 9098.47 1116.58 958.29 558.29 1516.58 400.0 0.58 3.79
5.00 9525.99 1156.87 978.43 578.43 1556.87 400.0 0.59 3.89
6.00 9816.15 1179.55 989.78 589.78 1579.55 400.0 0.60 3.95
7.00 10059.57 1195.95 997.97 597.97 1595.95 400.0 0.60 3.99
8.00 10199.10 1199.50 999.75 599.75 1599.50 400.0 0.60 4.00
9.00 10366.10 1205.88 1002.94 602.94 1605.88 400.0 0.60 4.01
10.00 10531.92 1211.71 1005.86 605.86 1611.71 400.0 0.60 4.03
11.00 10641.60 1210.73 1005.36 605.36 1610.73 400.0 0.60 4.03
12.00 10764.19 1210.91 1005.46 605.46 1610.91 400.0 0.60 4.03
13.00 10821.93 1203.57 1001.79 601.79 1603.57 400.0 0.60 4.01
14.00 10952.12 1204.05 1002.03 602.03 1604.05 400.0 0.60 4.01
15.00 11036.82 1199.26 999.63 599.63 1599.26 400.0 0.60 4.00
16.00 11017.89 1183.11 991.56 591.56 1583.11 400.0 0.60 3.96
17.00 10990.40 1166.11 983.06 583.06 1566.11 400.0 0.59 3.92
18.00 10981.73 1151.15 975.58 575.58 1551.15 400.0 0.59 3.88

CIP: 040684
Gerente General
REGISTRO
Revisión 6

Informe : LGG17-180-130
CB-110

ESFUERZO DESVIADOR & DEFORMACIÓN AXIAL

1400
1200
Esfuerzo Desviador Corregido (kPa)
1000 100 kPa
200 kPa
800
400 kPa
600
400
200
0
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0
Deformación Axial (%)
CÍRCULO DE MOHR
1200
100 kPa
Parámetros Totales:
1000
C = 28 kPa =C+ntan Ø 200 kPa
400 kPa
Ø = 35.63 º
Esfuerzo de Corte (kPa)
800
600
400
200
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Esfuerzo Axial (kPa)

CIP: 040684
Gerente General
Anexo 3.3 – Ensayos en Roca
Laboratorio de Mineralogía
Lima, 06 de Noviembre del 2017
Sr.
ZER GEOSYSTEM PERU S.A.C.
Presente.-
De mi mayor consideración:
Tengo el agrado de dirigirme a Ud. para saludarlo y hacerle llegar

adjunto a la presente, el informe del estudio de 01 muestra de roca, proporcionada
por usted.
Agradecemos la confianza depositada para la realización de este estudio, y

quedamos a su entera disposición para cualquier consulta al respecto.
Sin otro particular y con cordiales saludos, quedamos de Uds.
Atentamente,
……………………………………….
Carlos Rojas León
Ing. Geólogo
Universidad Nacional de Ingeniería
Av. Túpac Amaru N° 210, Lima 25, Perú

Teléfono: 382-2174 / Central Telefónica: 481-1070 Anexos: 4236
Email: escuelageologia@uni.edu.pe, crojasl@uni.edu.pe, carleouni@gmail.com
ESTUDIO PETROGRÁFICO MACROSCÓPICO

DE 01 MUESTRA DE ROCA
SOLICITADO POR:
ESTUDIO REALIZADO POR:

Carlos Rojas León
Ing. Geólogo
Marcelo Barzola Esteban

Ing. Geólogo
C.I.P. 44990
Lima, Noviembre del 2017
Av. Túpac Amaru N° 210, Lima 25, Perú

ESTUDIO PETROGRÁFICO MACROSCÓPICO
SOLICITADO: ZER GEOSYSTEM PERU S.A.C.

PROYECTO: EMS COMPLEMENTARIO CON FINES DE CIMENTACIÓN DEL
SISTEMA DE FAJAS TRANSPORTADORAS 5841 – CB – 110 y
5851 – CB - 110.
UBICACIÓN: SAN NICOLÁS, DISTRITO DE MARCONA, PROVINCIA DE
NAZCA, DEPARTAMENTO DE ICA.
FECHA: LIMA, 06 DE NOVIEMBRE DEL 2017.
MUESTRA: EG - 01
FOTOGRAFÍAS:
2 cm
Foto 1.- Vista superficial de la roca analizada, mostrando la textura fanerítica y

coloración superficial.
Av. Túpac Amaru N° 210, Lima 25, Perú 1

2 cm
Foto 2.- Vista similar a la anterior en la que se aprecia la superficie rugosa de

fractura.
5 mm
Foto 3.- Acercamiento de la superficie rocosa, se observa la textura fanerítica,

equigranular de la roca. Los colores oscuros corresponden a hornblendas,
los rosados a ortosas y los blanquecinos a plagioclasas. Además se
observan impregnaciones parduzcas debido a óxidos de Fe.

DESCRIPCIÓN MACROSCÓPICA DE LA MUESTRA DE MANO
 NATURALEZA DE LA ROCA: Ígnea.
 COLOR: Moteada, rosado claro y gris verdoso.
 GRADO DE METEORIZACIÓN: Leve a moderado.
 TEXTURA: Fanerítica, de grano medio a grueso.
 ESTRUCTURA Y FRACTURA: Estructura masiva, mostrando superficies de fractura

rugosas.
 MINERALES ESENCIALES: Principalmente ortosa, plagioclasas, cuarzo y anfíboles

(hornblenda).
 MINERALES ACCESORIOS: Escasa biotita.
 MINERALES SECUNDARIOS: Óxidos de hierro (limonitas, hematitas), y cloritas

alterando a las hornblendas.
 REACCIÓN AL ÁCIDO CLORHÍDRICO (HCl): Negativo.
 CLASIFICACIÓN MACROSCÓPICA: Granito hornbléndico.
 OBSERVACIONES: Roca ígnea, de textura fanerítica, compacta,

soporta fuertes golpes al martillo de geólogo; estimándose una resistencia a la
compresión simple de entre 80 a 100 MPa aproximadamente.
__________________________ _______________________________
Ejecutado: Carlos Rojas León Revisado: Marcelo Barzola Esteban

Ing. Geólogo Ing. Geólogo
C.I.P. 44990

Laboratorio de Mecánica de Rocas
Lima, 08 de Noviembre del 2017
Informe Nº 191/17/LMR/UNI
Señores
Presente.-
De nuestra consideración:
En el presente se adjunta los resultados de los ensayos del Laboratorio de Mecánica de Rocas
asociados al proyecto “EMS COMPLEMENTARIO CON FINES DE CIMENTACION DEL SISTEMA DE
FAJAS TRANSPORTADORAS 5841-CB-110 y 5851-CB-110”, ubicado en San Nicolás, distrito de
Marcona, provincia de Nazca, departamento de Ica.
Atentamente,
MSc. Ing. Néstor David Córdova Rojas

Jefe del Laboratorio de Mecánica de Rocas
Av. Túpac Amaru N° 210, Lima 25, Perú Pág. 1 de 8

Teléfono: 382-4557 / Central Telefónica: 481-1070 Anexos: 4221, 4219 y 4244
Email: lmrocas@uni.edu.pe, ncordovar@uni.edu.pe, sreyesm@uni.edu.pe
INFORME Nº 191/17/LMR/UNI
ENSAYO DE PROPIEDADES FISICAS

ENSAYO DE COMPRESION UNIAXIAL
ENSAYO DE CARGA PUNTUAL
Solicitado por:
Muestra: Bloques rocosos
Fecha: 08 de Noviembre del 2017

Informe: Nº 191/17/LMR/UNI
Empresa: ZER GEOSYSTEM PERU S.A.C.
Proyecto: “EMS COMPLEMENTARIO CON FINES DE CIMENTACION DEL SISTEMA DE FAJAS
TRANSPORTADORAS 5841-CB-110 y 5851-CB-110”
Fecha: 08/11/2017
ENSAYO DE PROPIEDADES FISICAS
Los ensayos se realizaron según la norma ASTM C97-02, dando los siguientes resultados:
Peso
Densidad Densidad Porosidad
Sondaje / Diámetro Altura Absorción Específico
Seca Húmeda Aparente
Muestra (cm) (cm) (%) Aparente
(g/cm3) (g/cm3) (%)
(kN/m3)
4.38 1.82 2.68 2.69 1.35 0.50 26.38
EG-01
4.38 1.70 2.69 2.70 1.25 0.46 26.47
M-01
4.38 1.50 2.66 2.67 1.02 0.38 26.20
Promedio 2.68 2.69 1.21 0.45 26.35
4.37 1.87 2.62 2.66 3.81 1.46 25.98
EG-02
4.37 1.90 2.61 2.65 3.30 1.26 25.89
M-02
4.37 1.61 2.53 2.58 4.51 1.78 25.13
Promedio 2.59 2.63 3.88 1.50 25.66
4.37 1.78 2.68 2.69 1.16 0.43 26.37
EG-03
4.37 1.76 2.63 2.64 1.10 0.42 25.90
M-03
4.37 1.63 2.67 2.68 1.10 0.41 26.27
Promedio 2.66 2.67 1.12 0.42 26.18
4.29 1.89 2.17 2.26 9.30 4.29 21.96
EG-04
4.26 1.96 2.16 2.26 9.63 4.46 21.86
M-04
4.20 2.10 2.08 2.16 8.04 3.87 21.06
Promedio 2.14 2.23 8.99 4.20 21.62
4.35 3.45 1.68 2.21 52.74 31.30 17.40
EG-05
4.39 3.39 1.73 2.30 56.32 32.49 18.02
M-05
4.51 3.60 1.64 2.08 44.04 26.79 17.75
Promedio 1.69 2.20 51.03 30.20 17.72

Informe: Nº 191/17/LMR/UNI
Empresa: ZER GEOSYSTEM PERU S.A.C.
Proyecto: “EMS COMPLEMENTARIO CON FINES DE CIMENTACION DEL SISTEMA DE FAJAS
TRANSPORTADORAS 5841-CB-110 y 5851-CB-110”
Fecha: 08/11/2017
ENSAYO DE COMPRESION UNIAXIAL
Los ensayos se realizaron según la norma ASTM D2938-95, dando los siguientes resultados:
Carga de
Diámetro Altura la Compresión la Compresión
Sondaje Muestra rotura
(cm) (cm) Uniaxial Uniaxial
(kN)
(kg/cm2) (MPa)
EG-01 M-01 4.38 8.92 157.8 1071 105.0
EG-02 M-02 4.38 8.99 46.8 318 31.2
EG-04 M-04 4.30 8.81 26.9 190 18.6
EG-05 M-05 7.62 13.08 3.6 8 0.8
ENSAYO DE CARGA PUNTUAL
Los ensayos se realizaron según la norma ASTM D5731-02, dando los siguientes resultados:
Diámetro Carga de Indice de Resistencia a

Sondaje /
equivalente rotura carga puntual la Compresión
Muestra
“De” (mm) (kN) “Is ” (MPa) Simple (MPa)
39.8 1.6 1.03 21.5
38.7 1.3 0.89 18.5
EG-02
42.6 1.9 1.03 22.2
M-02
41.1 1.3 0.77 16.3
40.1 1.9 1.21 25.4
Promedio 0.99 20.8
35.1 5.4 4.39 88.4
38.0 4.2 2.91 60.1
EG-03
38.0 5.5 3.81 78.7
M-03
38.3 6.2 4.23 87.5
40.7 6.6 3.98 84.1
Promedio 3.86 79.8
Nota:
 La empresa solicitante es responsable de la toma de muestra en campo.
 La información correspondiente a las muestras fue proporcionada por el solicitante.

FOTOS: PROPIEDADES FISICAS
Muestra: EG-01 / M-01

FOTOS: COMPRESION UNIAXIAL

Antes Después

Antes Después


Antes Después

Antes Después

FOTOS: CARGA PUNTUAL

Antes Después

Antes Después

Anexo 3.4 – Ensayos Químicos
Anexo 4.0 – Análisis de Cimentación
Anexo 4.1 – Curvas de Capacidad de Carga
Admisible
Anexo 4.2 – Curvas de Asentamiento Elástico
Anexo 5.0 – Panel Fotográfico
Anexo 5.1 – Panel Fotográfico – Refracción
Sísmica
CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
GEOFÍSICA – REFRACCIÓN SÍSMICA

FAJA 5841-CB-110
Fotografía 01: Vista panorámica de la zona de trabajo de la Línea LS-01

(Faja 5841- CB-110). Se puede apreciar el área de estudio donde se realizó
el ensayo de Refracción Sísmica, el tendido del cable trigger, cable de
refracción sísmica y la posición de los geófonos en el terreno.
Fotografía 02: Momentos previos a realizar el impacto de la comba sobre

el plato metálico correspondiente al Shot 2 del sondaje LS-01, empleado
para la generación de ondas sísmicas.
Anexo 5.1: Panel Fotográfico – Refracción Sísmica P063-214 SHOUGANG

CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
Fotografía 03: Vista panorámica de la zona de trabajo de la Línea LS-02. Se

puede apreciar el área de estudio donde se realizó el ensayo de Refracción
Sísmica, el tendido del cable trigger, cable de refracción sísmica y la posición
de los geófonos en el terreno.
Fotografía 04: Momentos previos a realizar el impacto de la comba sobre el

plato metálico correspondiente al Shot 3 del sondaje LS-02, empleado para
la generación de ondas sísmicas.

CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”



CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”

Sísmica, el tendido del cable de refracción sísmica y la posición de los
geófonos en el terreno, momentos previos a realizar el impacto de la comba
sobre el plato metálico empleado para la generación de ondas sísmicas.

Sísmica, el tendido del cable trigger y la posición de los geófonos en el
terreno, momentos previos a realizar el impacto de la comba sobre el plato
metálico empleado para la generación de ondas sísmicas.

CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”

Sísmica, el tendido del cable trigger y la posición de los geófonos en el
terreno.


CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”

Sísmica, el tendido del cable trigger, cable de refracción de sísmica y la
posición de los geófonos en el terreno.


CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”

Sísmica, al personal realizando el tendido del cable trigger, el cable de


CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”

Sísmica, al personal realizando el tendido del cable trigger, cable de


CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”



CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
FAJA 5851-CB-110
Fotografía 19: Vista panorámica de la zona de trabajo de la Línea LS-01’. Se


plato metálico correspondiente al Shot 4 del sondaje LS-01’, empleado para

CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”

Sísmica, el tendido del cable trigger, el cable de refracción sísmica y la


CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”



CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”

Sísmica, el equipo GEODE para la adquisición de datos, al personal
realizando el tendido del cable trigger, el cable de refracción sísmica y la


Anexo 5.2 – Panel Fotográfico – Ensayo MASW
CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
GEOFÍSICA – MASW
FAJA 5841-CB-110
Fotografía 01: Vista panorámica de la zona de trabajo donde se realizó el

ensayo sísmico MASW-01. Se observa al personal realizando el tendido de
los cables para la ejecución del ensayo y al equipo GEODE para la
adquisición de datos.

plato metálico correspondiente al Shot 02 del sondaje MASW-01, empleado
Anexo 5.2: Panel Fotográfico – MASW P063-214 SHOUGANG
CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”

ensayo sísmico MASW-02. Se observa al personal realizando el tendido del
cable trigger, cable de refracción sísmica y la posición de los geófonos en el
terreno.


CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”

ensayo sísmico MASW-03. Se observa el tendido del cable trigger, cable de


CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”

ensayo sísmico MASW-04. Se observa el equipo GEODE y el tendido del
cable de refracción sísmica, la posición de los geófonos en el terreno.


CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”

ensayo sísmico MASW-05. Se observa el tendido del cable trigger, el cable
de refracción sísmica y la posición de los geófonos en el terreno.


CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”

ensayo sísmico MASW-06. Se observa el equipo GEODE para la adquisición
de datos y el tendido del cable trigger, el cable de refracción sísmica y la


CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”

cable trigger, el cable de refracción sísmica y la posición de los geófonos en
el terreno.


CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”

ensayo sísmico MASW-08. Se observa el tendido del cable trigger y la


CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”

cable trigger, el cable de refracción sísmica y la colocación de los geófonos
en el terreno.


CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
FAJA 5851-CB-110

ensayo sísmico MASW-01’. Se observa el equipo GEODE toamando la
adquisición de datos, el tendido del cable trigger, cable de refracción sísmica
y la posición de los geófonos en el terreno.

plato metálico correspondiente al Shot 01 del sondaje MASW-01’, empleado

CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”

ensayo sísmico MASW-02’. Se observa el tendido de la wincha de 100 m, el
cable trigger, el cable de refracción sísmica y la posición de los geófonos en
el terreno.


CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”

ensayo sísmico MASW-03’. Se observa el tendido del cable trigger, cable de


CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”

ensayo sísmico MASW-04’. Se observa al personal realizando el tendido del
cable trigger, cable de refracción sísmica y la posición de los geófonos en el
terreno.


Anexo 5.3 – Panel Fotográfico – Registro de
Calicatas
CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
Fotografía 01: Vista panorámica de la Calicata C-01 Fotografía 02: Vista panorámica de la Calicata C-02
de 1.40 m de profundidad. Se aprecia que el macizo de profundidad de 1.30 m. El perfil estratigráfico está
rocoso ha sido meteorizado, que se presenta en conformado superficialmente por suelo residual
forma de suelo residual de color gris a beige claro, producto de la meteorización del macizo rocoso,
seguido de fragmentos de roca, angulosos de seguido, de fragmentos de roca con arena, angulosos
coloración verde a parduzco. de coloración gris claro a parduzco.
Fotografía 03: Vista panorámica de la Calicata C-03 Fotografía 04: Vista superior de la Calicata C-04 de
de profundidad de 1.30 m. El perfil estratigráfico está profundidad de 2.70 m. El perfil estratigráfico está
conformado superficialmente por suelo residual conformado superficialmente por arena fina con limos
producto de la meteorización del macizo rocoso de procedencia eólica, de color gris oscuro a beige
seguido de fragmentos de roca provenientes de la seguido por arena con limos y gravas. Se observó
excavación mecánica, de forma angulosa y alargada. lentes de caliche de color gris claro a beige que ofrece
moderada resistencia a la excavación mecánica.
Anexo 5.3: Panel Fotográfico – Registro de Calicatas P063-214 SHOUGANG

CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
Fotografía 05: Vista superior de la Calicata C-05 de Fotografía 06: Vista panorámica de la Calicata C-
profundidad de 3.00 m. El perfil estratigráfico está 06 de profundidad de 1.40 m. El perfil estratigráfico
conformado superficialmente por arena fina con limos está conformado superficialmente por arena fina
de procedencia eólica, de color beige claro seguido con limos de procedencia eólica, de color beige a
por arena pobremente gradada con limo y gravas y gris claro seguido por grava pobremente gradada
seguidamente de lentes de caliche de color gris claro en matriz arenosa con presencia de conchas
a beige en matriz arenosa de gran resistencia a la marinas desmenuzadas cementados en caliche de
excavación mecánica. color beige con manchas grises.
Fotografía 07: Vista superior de la Calicata C-07 de Fotografía 08: Vista panorámica de la Calicata C-
profundidad de 4.70 m. El perfil estratigráfico está 08 de profundidad de 3.40 m. El perfil estratigráfico
conformado superficialmente por arena fina de está conformado superficialmente por arena fina
procedencia eólica con restos de conchas marinas de procedencia eólica con restos de conchas
seguida de arenas y gravas con presencia aislada de marinas seguida por gravas en matriz arenosa con
conchas cementadas con sales. gran proporción de conchas cementadas con sales
y un estrato de limo arenoso de color beige claro.

CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
Fotografía 09: Vista panorámica de la Calicata C-09 Fotografía 10: Vista panorámica de la Calicata C-
de profundidad de 1.70 m. El perfil estratigráfico está 10 de profundidad de 1.90 m. El perfil estratigráfico
conformado superficialmente por un relleno de está conformado superficialmente por arena fina
gravas con T.M=6” en matriz de arena y limo de color con limos de procedencia eólica de color gris claro
beige seguido del macizo rocoso de color gris claro a beige, seguido por gravas subredondeadas en
con machas beige claro. matriz arenosa, con ligera presencia de conchas
cementadas de caliche de color pardo y finalmente
limo arenoso muy duro de color beige claro.
Fotografía 11: Vista panorámica de la Calicata C-11 Fotografía 12: Vista panorámica de la
de profundidad de 0.90 m. El perfil estratigráfico está Trinchera T-01. El perfil estratigráfico está
conformado superficialmente por arena con limos de conformado superficialmente por material
color beige claro amarillento seguido por grava suelto con presencia de gravas
compacta y hacia el fondo el macizo rocoso gris claro subredondeadas, seguido por intercalaciones
con machas de coloración beige. de limo arenoso color gris claro y limo beige
claro a pardo, de consistencia dura.

CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
Fotografía 13: Vista panorámica de la Trinchera T-02.

El perfil estratigráfico está conformado
superficialmente por material granular .0con gravas,
seguido por arena limo arcillosa compacta de color
beige claro en forma laminada.

Anexo 5.4 – Panel Fotográfico – Ensayo DPL
CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
Fotografía 01: Ensayo DPL-01 ubicado en Fotografía 02: Ensayo DPL-02 ubicado
la Faja 5841. La profundidad máxima en la Faja 5841. La profundidad máxima
alcanzada fue 1.00 m. alcanzada fue 0.60 m.
Fotografía 03: Ensayo DPL-03 adyacente a Fotografía 04: Ensayo DPL-04 ubicado en la
la calicata C-08, ubicado en la Faja 5841. La Faja 5841. La profundidad máxima
profundidad máxima alcanzada fue 0.80 m. alcanzada fue 1.30 m.
Anexo 5.4: Panel Fotográfico – Ensayo DPL P063-214 SHOUGANG

CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
Fotografía 05: Ensayo DPL-05 ubicado en Fotografía 06: Ensayo DPL-06 ubicado en la
la Faja 5841. La profundidad máxima Faja 5841. La profundidad máxima
alcanzada fue 0.80 m.
Fotografía 07: Ensayo DPL-07 adyacente Fotografía 08: Ensayo DPL-08 próximo a la
a la calicata C-06, en la Faja 5841. La calicata C-05, ubicado en la Faja 5841. La
profundidad máxima alcanzada fue 0.40 m. profundidad máxima alcanzada fue 0.90 m.

CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
Fotografía 09: Ensayo DPL-09 ubicado en Fotografía 10: Ensayo DPL-10 ubicado en
la Faja 5841. La profundidad máxima la Faja 5841. La profundidad máxima
Fotografía 11: Ensayo DPL-11 adyacente a Fotografía 12: Ensayo DPL-12 ubicado en la
la calicata C-03, ubicado en la Faja 5841. La Faja 5841. La profundidad máxima
profundidad máxima alcanzada fue 0.50 m. alcanzada fue 0.40 m.

CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
Fotografía 13: Ensayo DPL-13 en la Faja Fotografía 14: Ensayo DPL-14 próximo a la
5841. La profundidad máxima alcanzada fue Calicata C-11, ubicado en la Faja 5851. La
0.60 m.
profundidad máxima alcanzada fue 0.70 m.

Anexo 5.5 – Panel Fotográfico – Estaciones
Geomecánicas
CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
GEOLOGÍA – ESTACIONES GEOMECÁNICAS
FAJA 5841-CB-110
Fotografía 01: Se observa el lugar donde se realizó la Estación Geomecánica

EG-01, que consistió en la toma de datos como rumbo, buzamiento, estado
de las discontinuidades para la caracterización del macizo rocoso.

Anexo 5.5: Panel Fotográfico – Estaciones Geomecánicas P063-214 SHOUGANG

CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”



CB-110 Y 5851-CB-110”
FAJA 5851-CB-110
Fotografía 05: Se observa el lugar donde se realizó la Estación

Geomecánica EG-05, que consistió en la toma de datos como rumbo,
buzamiento, estado de las discontinuidades para la caracterización del
macizo rocoso.

Planos
N
EG-04
MASW-09
DPL-01
PD-03
MASW-08
W E C-08
DPL-04
MASW-07
S
CWE-08
DPL-05
C-07
CWE-09
MASW-06
DPL-06
MASW-05
CWE-10
DPL-07
V-6.2 6209 0.127

9
.25
65
8312
47
N=
E=
MASW-04'
PD-05
C-06
C-10
MASW-03'
CWE-11
C-05
CWE-20
DPL-08
C-11
MASW-04
MASW-02'
C-04
CAND-109
CWE-22
C-09
MASW-01'
CWE-12
C-03
EG-03
DPL-10
MASW-03
PAND-104
EG-01
C-02
C-01
PAND-101
PLANTA
ESC: 1:5000
N
EG-04
MASW-09
DPL-01
PD-03
MASW-08
W E C-08
DPL-04
MASW-07
CWE-08
DPL-05
C-07
CWE-09
MASW-06
DPL-06
MASW-05
CWE-10
DPL-07
V-6.2 6209 0.127

9
.25
65
8312
47
N=
E=
MASW-04'
PD-05
C-06
C-10
MASW-03'
CWE-11
C-05
CWE-20
DPL-08
C-11
MASW-04
MASW-02'
C-04
CAND-109
CWE-22
C-09
MASW-01'
CWE-12
C-03
EG-03
DPL-10
MASW-03
PAND-104
EG-01
C-02
C-01
PAND-101
PLANTA
ESC: 1:5000
PD-0
PD-0
C-03
CW E
CW E
3
CW E
CW E
5
C-08
-11
-09
-10
-08
CW E
PD-0
C-02
C-07
MASW-04
C-05
MASW-06
C-04
C-06
MASW-03 MASW-05 MASW-07 MASW-08
-12
4
MASW-09 EG-04
PLANTA
ESC: H 1:3000
MASW-03
MASW-04
MASW-05 MASW-06
P-05
SM Depósito marino
SM
MASW-07
GP
Conglomerado
MASW-08
P-03
SM
Limolitas
Limolitas con arena
PERFIL LONGITUDINAL
ESC: H 1:3000
Suelo eólico compuesto por arena de grano fino a veces

limosas, de espesor de 0.10 a 0.50 m, son suelos
superficiales que tienen que ser removidos para la
cimentación de las estructuras.
Formación Pisco: Rocas de color amarillo crema verdoso,

también conglomerados amarillentos compactos.
Rocas intrusivas compuestas por monzogranito de colos gris

rosaceo en alteración gris verdosas, muy duras y
resistentes, fracturadas, interiormente se encuentran
masivas.
Contacto Inferido
9
-10
V-6.2
ND
EG-05 E=476209.259
2
9
CA
E-2
9
N=8312650.127
E-2
E-1
C-0
0
CW
C-1
CW
CW
C-1
MASW-02'
MASW-01'
MASW-03'
MASW-04'
PLANTA
ESC: H 1:1000
MASW-01
0 672
687
728
5 785
916
10
1047
1128
MASW-02
1235
15 1310 0
1363
911
926
1017
MASW-03
20 1388 5 1176
1237
1406 1290 0
474
488
MASW-04
25 1427 10 1328
490
1353 516
1457
5
550
Suelo eólico compuesto por arena de grano fino a veces
1377
30
800 1000 1200 1400
15
605 limosas, de espesor de 0.10 a 0.50 m, son suelos
1400
10 647
0
240
superficiales que tienen que ser removidos para la
20 1425 676 272
336
cimentación de las estructuras.
1452 15 706
5 387
25 735 428
1466
763
458 Suelo antrópico, compuesto por gravas limosas, arenas
20 10
1475 483
30 786
limosas, con ffragmentos de rocas, desmonte de mina y
501
1000 1200 1400
25 518
materiales acarreados de excavaciones cercanas.
804 15
534
815
30 20 555
600 800
568 Formación Pisco: Rocas de color amarillo crema verdoso,
25 572
también conglomerados amarillentos compactos.
578
30
300 400 500
Rocas intrusivas compuestas por monzogranito de colos gris

rosaceo en alteración gris verdosas, muy duras y
resistentes, fracturadas, interiormente se encuentran
masivas.
Contacto Inferido
PERFIL LONGITUDINAL
ESC: H 1:1000

Geotechnical Report: Rev. Date Issued For Issued by Reviewed by Approved by Approved

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Geotechnical Report: Rev. Date Issued For Issued by Reviewed by Approved by Approved

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

993462-5700-G-GF-INF-001 Rev.

SHOUGANG HIERRO PERU S.A.A.

COMPLEMENTARY GEOTECHNICAL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN OF

SHP CODE: 993462-5700-G-GF-INF-001

CONTRACTOR CODE: P063-214 SHOUGANG

Rev. Date Issued for Issued by Reviewed by Approved by SHP Approved

SHOUGANG HIERRO PERU. S.A.A.

SHOUGANG HIERRO PERU. S.A.A.

6.7.1 Belt 5841-CB-110 and 5851-CB-110 – Footing.................................................. 39

SHOUGANG HIERRO PERU. S.A.A.

Classification of soil profiles obtained from the MASW tests

Vs30 Soil Profile Classification

Type of Soil profile: S2

BELT / FOUNDATION TYPE OF Df (m)

Intrusive igneous rock -

Silty Sandy Gravels and

Intrusive igneous rock -

Transfer Tower Intrusive igneous rock -

Specific Internal Module of

Silty sandy gravels and gravelly

• Results of admissible load capacity of footings:

2.2 Objetives y Scope

• Collection of existing information from the study area.

• Report "Geotechnical Study - Package N ° 6", CWE, 2014.

2.3.1 Review of Existing Studies

2.3.2 Review of Geotechnical Studies

COORDINATES UTM* ROCK TOTAL

COORDINATES UTM* ROCK TOTAL

Belt 6: 5841- C-10 476599 8312726 NE NE 0.70

COORDINATES UTM* ROCK TOTAL

COORDINATES UTM* ROCK TOTAL

Anddes (2016) executed a total of 05 diamond-type boreholes (see Map 993462-5700-G-GF-DWG-

COORDINATES UTM* ROCK TOTAL

3. GENERAL SITE INFORMATION

3.2.1.2 Regional lithology

3.2.1.3 Regional geo-structural

3.2.2 Local geology

• Plains: This morphology is characterized by homogeneous zones of insignificant elevations

3.2.3 Geomorphological aspects

3.2.4 Lithostratigraphic aspects

3.2.5 Geo structural aspects

3.2.6 Geological Hazards

• Winding products of the wind activity.

3.2.7 Geotechnical considerations

3.3.1 Seismic History of the Study Region

- In 18 cities with a total of 309,000 inhabitants, the sewers were destroyed.

- 6,730 classrooms were destroyed.

- The facilities to irrigate 110,000 hectares were damaged.

4. GEOTECHNICAL FIELD INVESTIGATIONS

COORDINATES UTM* ROCK TOTAL

4.3 DPL test

DPL-03: It has a NDPL between 20 and 70 up to 0.50 m depth, which

DPL-06: It presents a number of blows NDPL between 7 and 30 up to 1.50

DPL-10: It has a number of NDPL hits between 2 and 6 up to 0.20 m depth,

DPL-11: It has a number of NDPL hits between 3 and 16 up to 0.20 m

Table 4.2 - Summary of DPL tests Carried out

COORDINATES UTM* TOTAL

4.4 Geophysical tests

4.4.1 Theoretical basis of geophysical tests

Figure 4-2: Schematic of seismic refraction test

Velocidad de Fase (c)

Figure 4-4: Initial model based on a 1/3 of the wavelength transformation

4.4.2 Description of field geophysical tests

Vs Vp р μ Gmáx Emáx E=0.3Emáx E=0.3Emáx

Foundation Prof. Vs Vp р μ Gmáx Emáx E=0.2Emáx E=0.2Emáx