Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Domestic jurisdiction:
The charter does not authorise the united nations to intervene in matters
which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state. this
provision of the charter creates problems. sometimes it becomes difficult
to determine whether a matter is of domestic jurisdiction or has become
the concern of the whole world. for example, the freedom struggle of
Bangladesh in 1971 was interpreted by vested interests as a matter
falling within the domestic jurisdiction of Pakistan. The struggle of
Tamils in Sri Lanka is another example. such conflicts have threatened
world peace but the UNO cannot effectively intervene in them.
self defense:
Article 51 of the charter recognises the inherent right of individual
or collective self defense. but what would justify a state to resort to force
in self defense is open to different interpretations. An aggressive war
may be justified in the name of self-defense.
Veto:
The provision of veto in the proceeding of the security council acts as a
stumbling block in the proper functioning of the united nations. the
purpose of the veto was to guarantee unanimity of opinion and action of
the big powers. but today veto instead of being a symbol action of
concord has become a cause of discord.
lack of compulsory jurisdiction:
A serious limitation on the functioning of the United Nations is
that the jurisdiction of the international court of justice is not
compulsory. in order to strengthen the united nations, it is essential that
the jurisdiction of the court must be compulsory.
other causes:
The rivalry of the USA and the USSR has reduced the importance
of UNO. it has become a pawn in the game of power politics of the
super power. these states dominate the world economically and
militarily. the underdeveloped nations are so weak that they find it
difficult to assert their independence. the UNO has never been able to
take action against the USA or Russia even when they have blatantly
violated the charter. Every issue in the UNO is decided neither on its
merits nor principles. but on the considerations of power politics.