Material: Cynthia Deng

1/2” white foamcore

SCI 6122
Assembly method: Billie Faircloth
Lamination Final Exam - Part 3

Sensor 1 (hotter zone)

Sensor 2 (cooler zone)

Outer Layer:
Box joint

Inner Layer:
Butt joint,
compression
by outer layer Result 1: Result 2:
keeping pieces Our sensors showed that Zone 2 Both of our sensors read interior
in place. Inner was quite close to the target volume temperatures that were
partition temperature, but our Zone 1 was very close to temperature goals!
created with too warm according to Sensor 1. We improved using sensor
box joint. As an adjustment, we moved the adjustment rather than
sensor closer to the corner joint construction adjustment.
near the lid, where we suspected
the sensor would be more
exposed to the heat dispersal
occurring at the joints. We opted
not to make construction
Zone 2, adjustments for fear of
predicted to disrupting the perfect reading on
be the cooler our Sensor 2.
zone

Heat load
(cup of
boiling water)
Hypothesis:
Using principles we picked up in
this class and Sal’s class, we
Zone 1, formed the hypothesis that the
predicted to raised volume would be warmer;
be the hotter heated air is less dense and
zone would therefore stay closer to
the upper areas of the enclosed
space (like Zone 1). The lower
volume (Zone 2) would
ostensably collect some of the
warmed air that had dispersed
some of its heat energy and had
become denser and heavier.