Professional Documents
Culture Documents
& Positioning
Telrad Vs. Proprietary Comparison (@5GHz)
Aspect Proprietary Telrad LTE LTE Benefits with Telrad
Technology Wi-Fi based Standard LTE • Devices Ecosystem with lower cost
• Multi-Vendor interoperability
• 4G Encryption
Diversity Improved business case:
• Base - Station 2x2 4x4 • Better coverage using less BS sites
• CPE 2x2 2x4 • Supporting Near - LOS scenarios
• Link Budget Better by 10-15 dB • Serving more customers & better
Interference Limited, based on Inherent LTE standard • Higher effective throughput per given
mitigations WiFi alike capabilities & Telrad interfered area
techniques mechanisms unique techniques • Improved business case
CA Only contiguous contiguous & Non- • More flexibility to select the less
2x20MHz / 40MHz spectrum Contiguous spectrum interfered channel of 20MHz
# of subs per Effectively 32/64 >100’s of CPEs per • Serving more customers with improved
sector sector with committed service quality
throughput and QoS • Faster ROI & Enhanced business model
Throughput High marketing Real field proven figure • Better and real business case by
figures of up to 250Mbps providing high and reliable throughput
QoS Basic Real LTE standard QoS • Better differentiation among different
capabilities customers and their service profiles
Deployment Limited Reuse High performance in LTE • Higher capacity per area
Flexibility deployment & Native mobility by LTE (CA for non-contiguous channels)
16 as a
Mobility standard • For Fix/Nomadic/Mobility application
proprietary Wi-Fi One BS for 2xSectors • Improved business case
Telrad Unlicensed Solution Positioning
• Target customers
Don’t have licensed spectrum
Have limited licensed spectrum and are interested in expending Coverage &
Capacity by supplementing the licensed spectrum with unlicensed one
15
Real life Situation of Unlicensed Spectrum, 5.x GHz –
“Jungle” of Interference
• There are many AP of all types all over
Some are outdoor
Some are indoor
Some are with High Power and High gain
• Most of the AP have low end radio / filters that causes radio
blinding below and above their spectrum mask therefore it’s a
source of unpredicted interference
• The unlicensed equipment is typically not synchronized (no GPS)
Telrad unlicensed LTE Solution has several unparalleled techniques (TD-LTE standard driven &
Unique techniques) to mitigate effectively the interference and as a result to improve the
performance figures versus the competitive environment
11
Telrad Interference Mitigation Given Capabilities as
TDD-LTE Standard Solution Driven Vs. Proprietary
• LTE, a standard ecosystem was designed holistically, to be a better
technology for outdoor environment, therefore more interference robust
• LTE Phy can handle better an interfered areas than the WiFi based solutions
mainly due to its cyclic prefix
Improves the InterSymbol Interference and multipath reception
12
Telrad Interference Mitigation Given Capabilities as
TDD-LTE Standard Solution Driven Vs. Proprietary (Cont)
• WiFi technology relies on Contention & Carrier Sense techniques
to find a clear channel before transmission while LTE is based on a
scheduled technology
LTE can suffer performance degradation when exposed to high levels of
interferences while WiFi can be completely blocked
13
Telrad Vs. Proprietary Summary (@5GHz)
• Standard solution
• “Core-less”
• Better diversity and link budget
• Non contagious CA
• nLOS/LOS capabilities
• Mobility support
• Higher number of serves customers
• Standard premium QoS
• Standard effective interference mitigation
• DL-256QAM*
• Providing excellent business case model with rapid ROI
17
Thank You
23