Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Yuan-Chun He,* Li-Yuan Xiao, Zi-Han Yuan, Jie Zhang, Yan Wang and Na Xu*
Received 4 September 2019
Accepted 29 October 2019 College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Qufu Normal University, Qufu 273165, People’s Republic of China.
*Correspondence e-mail: heyc240@nenu.edu.cn, xunaqfnu@163.com
Edited by I. D. Williams, Hong Kong University
of Science and Technology, Hong Kong
Coordination polymers (CPs) have attracted increasing interest in recent years.
In this work, two new CPs, namely poly[[aquabis(2,20 -bipyridine-2N,N0 ){3-5-
Keywords: coordination polymer; cadmium; 0
1. Introduction
In recent years, coordination complexes with one-dimensional
(1D), two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D)
structures have been known as coordination polymers (CPs)
(Batten et al., 2013). Up to now, CPs have attracted increasing
attention for their interesting structures (Qin et al., 2017; He et
al., 2017a) and various applications, for example, luminescence
(Zhang et al., 2018a; Das & Mandal, 2018), catalysis (Li et al.,
2019; Zhang et al., 2018b), magnetism (Yang et al., 2019;
Huang et al., 2019), drug delivery (Wang et al., 2013), gas
adsorption and separation (Liu et al., 2016; Xue et al., 2019),
and so on. CPs are mainly composed of ligands and metals
linked by coordination bonds. In addition, there are several
weak interactions, such as hydrogen bonding, – stacking
and van der Waals. These weak interactions can effectively
stabilize the whole structure, while low-dimensional CPs can
be extended to form interesting high-dimensional supra-
molecular structures by weak interactions (Ghosh et al., 2019;
Khanpour et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2017). The – interaction is a
weak interaction between rigid rings, including benzene,
pyridine, imidazole and so on. Thus, some ligands with rigid
rings are beneficial to the formation of CPs with – inter-
actions.
In this work, we chose the tricarboxylic acid 5-[(4-carb-
oxyphenoxy)methyl]benzene-1,3-dicarboxylic acid (H3L) as
the main ligand and 2,20 -bipyridine (bpy) as an auxiliary
ligand. The benzene rings of H3L and the pyridine rings of bpy
# 2019 International Union of Crystallography can provide efficient recognition sites for – interactions to
Crystal data
Chemical formula [Cd2(C16H9O7)(CHO2)(C10H8N2)2(H2O)]H2O [Mn2(C16H10O7)2(C10H8N2)2]3H2O
Mr 931.45 1104.77
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/c Triclinic, P1
Temperature (K) 150 150
a, b, c (Å) 13.8999 (7), 18.0445 (11), 14.4096 (8) 9.9758 (6), 10.5290 (7), 13.7445 (9)
, , ( ) 90, 99.568 (2), 90 91.623 (4), 108.250 (3), 116.694 (3)
V (Å3) 3563.9 (3) 1200.37 (14)
Z 4 1
Radiation type Mo K Mo K
(mm1) 1.26 0.61
Crystal size (mm) 0.32 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.16 0.15
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker D8 Venture Bruker D8 Venture
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2016) Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2016)
Tmin, Tmax 0.692, 0.729 0.890, 0.913
No. of measured, independent and observed 82482, 6515, 5402 21405, 4370, 3522
[I > 2 (I)] reflections
Rint 0.055 0.044
(sin
/)max (Å1) 0.602 0.602
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2 (F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.028, 0.064, 1.03 0.052, 0.160, 1.11
No. of reflections 6515 4370
No. of parameters 511 370
No. of restraints 11 15
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent H atoms treated by a mixture of independent
and constrained refinement and constrained refinement
max, min (e Å3) 0.51, 0.39 0.99, 0.41
Computer programs: APEX3 (Bruker, 2016), SAINT (Bruker, 2016), SHELXT2018 (Sheldrick, 2015a), SHELXL2018 (Sheldrick, 2015b), SHELXTL (Bruker, 2016), DIAMOND
(Brandenburg & Putz, 2005) and SHELXTL (Bruker, 2016).
form interesting structures. The three carboxylic acid groups under hydrothermal conditions. Furthermore, these two
of H3L can adopt various coordination modes. In addition, compounds have also been characterized by single-crystal
factors such as reaction temperature, pH values, solvents, X-ray diffraction, IR spectroscopy, elemental analysis (EA),
powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), fluorescence in the solid
state and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA).
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials and methods
The chemical reagents used were purchased and used
without further purification. PXRD patterns were recorded on
a MiniFlex600 X-ray diffractometer with graphite-mono-
chromatized Cu K radiation ( = 0.154 nm). The C, H and N
elemental analyses were measured on a PE 2400 elemental
analyzer. IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet iS5 spectro-
meter. Thermogravimetric analyses were performed on a
HengJiu HCT-1 analyzer. The luminescence properties were
measured on a F-4600 fluorescence spectrometer.
Acta Cryst. (2019). C75, 1562–1568 He et al. Cd and Mn coordination polymers 1563
research papers
63%). Analysis calculated (%) for C37H30Cd2N4O11: C 47.71, Table 2
H 3.25, N 6.01; found: C 47.55, H 3.48, N 5.89. IR (cm1): 3435 Selected geometric parameters (Å, ) for 1.
(s), 2926 (m), 1605 (s), 1400 (s), 1166 (w), 854 (w), 770 (m). Cd1—O9i 2.232 (2) Cd2—O4 2.161 (2)
When Mn(CH3COO)24H2O (0.1 mmol, 25 mg) was used Cd1—O6ii 2.240 (2) Cd2—O1W 2.276 (2)
Cd1—O2 2.280 (2) Cd2—O9 2.2880 (19)
instead of Cd(CH3COO)22H2O, CP 2 was obtained by a Cd1—N1 2.367 (2) Cd2—N3 2.350 (3)
similar method (yield 47%). Analysis calculated (%) for Cd1—N2 2.394 (2) Cd2—N4 2.401 (3)
C26H21MnN2O8.5: C 56.53, H 3.83, N 5.07; found: C 56.37, H Cd1—O1 2.502 (2) Cd2—O8 2.571 (2)
4.12, N 5.19. IR (cm1): 3431 (s), 2925 (w), 1615 (s), 1406 (s), O9i—Cd1—O6ii 100.04 (8) O4—Cd2—O1W 96.27 (9)
1244 (m), 1169 (m), 1012 (w), 769 (w). O9i—Cd1—O2 139.57 (7) O4—Cd2—O9 130.07 (9)
O6ii—Cd1—O2 86.14 (7) O1W—Cd2—O9 85.86 (8)
O9i—Cd1—N1 85.95 (8) O4—Cd2—N3 95.78 (10)
O6ii—Cd1—N1 172.97 (8) O1W—Cd2—N3 165.17 (10)
O2—Cd1—N1 91.66 (8) O9—Cd2—N3 92.97 (8)
O9i—Cd1—N2 121.75 (8) O4—Cd2—N4 133.91 (9)
O6ii—Cd1—N2 102.09 (8) O1W—Cd2—N4 93.74 (9)
O2—Cd1—N2 95.21 (8) O9—Cd2—N4 95.41 (8)
N1—Cd1—N2 71.43 (8) N3—Cd2—N4 71.63 (10)
O9i—Cd1—O1 83.72 (7) O4—Cd2—O8 77.59 (9)
O6ii—Cd1—O1 96.14 (7) O1W—Cd2—O8 103.19 (9)
O2—Cd1—O1 55.85 (7) O9—Cd2—O8 53.72 (7)
N1—Cd1—O1 88.12 (8) N3—Cd2—O8 87.84 (9)
N2—Cd1—O1 144.65 (7) N4—Cd2—O8 142.58 (8)
Symmetry codes: (i) x 1; y; z; (ii) x; y þ 12; z þ 32.
1564 He et al. Cd and Mn coordination polymers Acta Cryst. (2019). C75, 1562–1568
research papers
anion, a bpy ligand and one and a half lattice water molecules a 3D supramolecular structure by intermolecular – inter-
in the asymmetric unit (Fig. 2a). Atom Mn1 is six-coordinated actions (Fig. 2d).
by four O atoms from three HL2 anions (O1, O3ii, O4ii and
O6i; Table 3) and two N atoms from a bpy ligand (N1 and N2)
in a distorted octahedral geometry. In this way, a ladder chain 3.3. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and thermogravimetric
is formed and the bpy ligands are located on both sides of the analysis (TGA)
ladder (Fig. 2b). There are two kinds of intermolecular – CPs 1 and 2 have been characterized by PXRD and TGA.
interactions between bpy ligands of adjacent asymmetric units As shown in Fig. 3, the experimental and simulated patterns
(Fig. 2c). The face-to-face, centroid-to-centroid and slippage are identical. The results reveal that the purity of the powder
distances between six-membered rings C10–C15 and N2/C22– sample is good.
C26 are 3.677, 3.305 and 1.612 Å, respectively, and the The thermal stability properties of 1 and 2 were tested from
corresponding distances between the other six-membered room temperature to 800 C. As shown in Fig. 4(a), for 1, the
rings (N1/C17–C21 and N2/C22–C26) are 3.634, 3.293 and first loss (observed 3.92%, calculated 3.86%) from room
1.537 Å, respectively. The 1D ladder chains are extended into temperature to 170 C can be attributed to a water molecule,
Figure 1
Views of (a) the coordination environments of the CdII cations of CP 1, with H atoms omitted for clarity, (b) the 1D chain, (c) the 2D layer, (d) the
intramolecular – interactions, (e) the intermolecular – interactions and (f) the 3D supramolecular structure. The symmetry codes are as in Table 2.
Acta Cryst. (2019). C75, 1562–1568 He et al. Cd and Mn coordination polymers 1565
research papers
Figure 2
Views of (a) the coordination environment of the MnII cation of CP 2, with H atoms omitted for clarity, (b) the 1D chain, (c) the intermolecular –
interactions and (d) the 3D supramolecular structure. The symmetry codes are as in Table 3.
1566 He et al. Cd and Mn coordination polymers Acta Cryst. (2019). C75, 1562–1568
research papers
Figure 4
TGA curves of (a) CP 1 and (b) CP 2. Figure 5
Solid-state excitation (black) and emission (blue) spectra of (a) CP 1 and
(b) CP 2.
with free H3L, the emission bands of 1 and 2 are red-shifted by
23 and 28 nm, respectively. This may be because the *!n or
*! gaps of H3L decrease after the replacement of the
hydrogen proton by a metal ion (Zhang et al., 2009, 2010). References
Batten, S. R., Champness, N. R., Chen, X., Garcia-Martinez, J.,
Kitagawa, S., Öhrström, L., O’Keeffe, M., Paik Suh, M. & Reedijk,
4. Conclusions J. (2013). Pure Appl. Chem. 85, 1715–1724.
Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2005). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact
We have prepared two new CPs based on a tricarboxylic acid GbR, Bonn, Germany.
and 2,20 -bipyridine. Structure analysis reveals that CPs 1 and 2 Bruker (2016). APEX3, SAINT, SADABS and SHELXTL. Bruker
show different configurations. CP 1 displays a 3D supra- AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Cui, Y., Yue, Y., Qian, G. & Chen, B. (2012). Chem. Rev. 112, 1126–
molecular structure extended from 2D layers by inter- 1162.
molecular – interactions. When CdII is replaced by MnII, CP Das, P. & Mandal, S. K. (2018). J. Mater. Chem. A, 6, 21274–21279.
2 shows a different 3D supramolecular structure extended Ghosh, A., Hazra, A., Mondal, A. & Banerjee, P. (2019). Inorg. Chim.
from 1D ladder chains by intermolecular – interactions. The Acta, 488, 86–119.
results suggest that the metal ion and – interactions play He, Y., Guo, J., Xu, N. & Yu, Y. (2017a). Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 33,
44–48.
important roles in the design and construction of various CPs. He, Y., Xu, N., Zhao, F., Kan, W., Wang, Y. & You, J. (2017b).
In addition, the solid-state luminescence spectra of 1 and 2 Polyhedron, 134, 330–335.
were studied at room temperature. Huang, H., Gao, W., Zhang, X., Zhou, A. & Liu, J. (2019).
CrystEngComm, 21, 694–702.
Khanpour, M., Naghipour, A., Azhdari Tehrani, A., Morsali, A.,
Funding information Morales-Morales, D. & Yunessnia Lehi, A. (2017). J. Inorg.
Funding for this research was provided by: National Natural Organomet. Polym. 27, 406–417.
Li, B., Ju, Z., Zhou, M., Su, K. & Yuan, D. (2019). Angew. Chem. Int.
Science Foundation of China (grant No. 21601104); Natural Ed. 58, 7687–7691.
Science Foundation of Shandong Province (grant No. Liu, B., Yang, G., Wang, Y., Liu, R., Hou, L. & Shi, Q. (2011). Inorg.
ZR2016BQ19). Chim. Acta, 367, 127–134.
Acta Cryst. (2019). C75, 1562–1568 He et al. Cd and Mn coordination polymers 1567
research papers
Liu, F.-Y., Zhou, D.-M., Zhao, X.-L. & Kou, J.-F. (2017). Acta Cryst. Wen, S. & Xu, D. (2017). J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 14, 605–612.
C73, 1010–1016. Xue, D., Wang, Q. & Bai, J. (2019). Coord. Chem. Rev. 378, 2–16.
Liu, L., Wang, S., Han, Z., Ding, M., Yuan, D. & Jiang, H. (2016). Yang, L., He, X. & Dincă, M. (2019). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 10475–
Inorg. Chem. 55, 3558–3565. 10480.
Ma, J., Jiang, F., Zhou, K., Chen, L., Wu, M. & Hong, M. (2015). Z. Zhang, L., Ma, J., Yang, J., Liu, Y. & Wei, G. (2009). Cryst. Growth
Anorg. Allg. Chem. 641, 1998–2004. Des. 9, 4660–4673.
Meng, F., Jia, H., Hu, N. & Xu, J. (2012). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 21, Zhang, L., Ma, J., Yang, J., Pang, Y. & Ma, J. (2010). Inorg. Chem. 49,
186–190. 1535–1550.
Qin, J., Yuan, S., Wang, Q., Alsalme, A. & Zhou, H. (2017). J. Mater. Zhang, Q., Lei, M., Kong, F. & Yang, Y. (2018a). Chem. Commun. 54,
Chem. A, 5, 4280–4291. 10901–10904.
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Zhang, S., Jiang, F., Bu, Y., Wu, M., Ma, J., Shan, X., Xiong, K. &
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Hong, M. (2012). CrystEngComm, 14, 6394–6396.
Wang, F., Liu, W., Teat, S., Xu, F., Wang, H., Wang, X., An, L. & Li, J. Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, L., Wei, N., Gao, M., Zhao, D. & Han, Z.
(2016). Chem. Commun. 52, 10249–10252. (2018b). Inorg. Chem. 57, 2193–2198.
Wang, Y., Yang, J., Liu, Y. & Ma, J. (2013). Chem. Eur. J. 19, 14591– Zhou, L., Xue, Y., Xu, Y., Zhang, J. & Du, H. (2013). CrystEngComm,
14599. 15, 7315–7320.
1568 He et al. Cd and Mn coordination polymers Acta Cryst. (2019). C75, 1562–1568
supporting information
supporting information
Computing details
For both structures, data collection: APEX3 (Bruker, 2016); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2016); data reduction:
SAINT (Bruker, 2016); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT2018 (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine
structure: SHELXL2018 (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2016) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg
& Putz, 2005); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2016).
Poly[[aquabis(2,2′-bipyridine-κ2N,N′){µ3-5-[(4-carboxylatophenoxy)methyl]benzene-1,3-dicarboxylato-
κ4O1,O1′:O3:O5}(µ-formato-κ3O:O,O′)dicadmium(II)] monohydrate] (Cd)
Crystal data
[Cd2(C16H9O7)(CHO2)(C10H8N2)2(H2O)]·H2O F(000) = 1856
Mr = 931.45 Dx = 1.736 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 13.8999 (7) Å Cell parameters from 9802 reflections
b = 18.0445 (11) Å θ = 2.5–27.1°
c = 14.4096 (8) Å µ = 1.26 mm−1
β = 99.568 (2)° T = 150 K
V = 3563.9 (3) Å3 Block, colorless
Z=4 0.32 × 0.25 × 0.25 mm
Data collection
Bruker D8 Venture 6515 independent reflections
diffractometer 5402 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: sealed tube Rint = 0.055
ω scans θmax = 25.4°, θmin = 2.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan h = −16→16
(SADABS; Bruker, 2016) k = −21→21
Tmin = 0.692, Tmax = 0.729 l = −17→17
82482 measured reflections
Refinement
Refinement on F2 11 restraints
Least-squares matrix: full Primary atom site location: structure-invariant
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028 direct methods
wR(F2) = 0.064 Hydrogen site location: mixed
S = 1.03 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent
6515 reflections and constrained refinement
511 parameters
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)
Symmetry codes: (i) x−1, y, z; (ii) −x, y+1/2, −z+3/2; (iii) −x, y−1/2, −z+3/2; (iv) x+1, y, z.
Poly[[(2,2′-bipyridine-κ2N,N′){µ3-5-[(4-carboxyphenoxy)methyl]benzene-1,3-dicarboxylato-
κ4O1,O1′:O3:O5}manganese(II)] sesquihydrate] (Mn)
Crystal data
[Mn2(C16H10O7)2(C10H8N2)2]·3H2O Z=1
Mr = 1104.77 F(000) = 568
Triclinic, P1 Dx = 1.528 Mg m−3
a = 9.9758 (6) Å Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 10.5290 (7) Å Cell parameters from 7534 reflections
c = 13.7445 (9) Å θ = 2.2–26.4°
α = 91.623 (4)° µ = 0.61 mm−1
β = 108.250 (3)° T = 150 K
γ = 116.694 (3)° Block, colorless
V = 1200.37 (14) Å3 0.20 × 0.16 × 0.15 mm
Data collection
Bruker D8 Venture 4370 independent reflections
diffractometer 3522 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: sealed tube Rint = 0.044
φ and ω scans θmax = 25.3°, θmin = 2.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan h = −12→12
(SADABS; Bruker, 2016) k = −12→12
Tmin = 0.890, Tmax = 0.913 l = −16→16
21405 measured reflections
Refinement
Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant
Least-squares matrix: full direct methods
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.052 Hydrogen site location: mixed
wR(F2) = 0.160 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent
S = 1.11 and constrained refinement
4370 reflections w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0862P)2 + 1.1197P]
370 parameters where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
15 restraints (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
Δρmax = 0.99 e Å−3
Δρmin = −0.41 e Å−3
Special details
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance
matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles;
correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate
(isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Experiments were carried out at 150 K with Mo Kα radiation using a Bruker D8 Venture diffractometer.
Absorption was corrected for by multi-scan methods (SADABS; Bruker, 2016). The non-hydrogen atoms were refined
with anisotropic displacement parameters, while the
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+2, −z+2; (ii) x+1, y, z; (iii) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (iv) x−1, y, z.
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+2, −z+2; (iii) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (v) x, y+1, z; (vi) −x, −y, −z+1; (vii) x, y−1, z; (viii) x+1, y+1, z+1; (ix) −x, −y+1, −z+2; (x)
−x, −y+2, −z+2; (xi) −x+1, −y+1, −z+2.