Professional Documents
Culture Documents
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225002, People’s Republic of China.
Edited by A. G. Oliver, University of Notre
*Correspondence e-mail: koulinzhang2002@yahoo.com
Dame, USA
Keywords: supramolecular coordination Multifunctional 2-amino-5-sulfobenzoic acid (H2afsb) can exhibit a variety of
polymer; dinuclear compound; copper(II); roles during the construction of supramolecular coordination polymers. The
paddlewheel structure; synthesis; characteriza-
pendant carboxylic acid, sulfonic acid and amino groups could not only play a
tion; dehydration–rehydration behaviour; crystal
structure.
role in directing bonding but could also have the potential to act as hydrogen-
bond donors and acceptors, resulting in extended high-dimensional supramole-
CCDC references: 1823618; 1823617 cular networks. Two new CuII coordination compounds, namely catena-poly-
0
[[[diaquacopper(II)]--1,6-bis(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)hexane-2N4:N4 ] bis(3-amino-
Supporting information: this article has 4-carboxybenzenesulfonate) dihydrate], {[Cu(C10H16N6)2(H2O)2](C7H6NO5S)2-
supporting information at journals.iucr.org/c
2H2O}n or {[Cu(bth)2(H2O)2](Hafsb)22H2O}n, (1), and bis(-2-amino-5-sulfon-
0 0
atobenzoato-2O1:O1 )bis{-1,2-bis[(1H-imidazol-1-yl)methyl]benzene-2N3:N3 }-
bis[aquacopper(II)] trihydrate, [Cu2(C7H5NO5S)2(C14H14N4)2(H2O)2]3H2O or
[Cu2(afsb)2(obix)2(H2O)2]3H2O, (2), have been obtained through the assembly
between H2afsb and the CuII ion in the presence of the flexible N-donor ligands
1,6-bis(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)hexane (bth) and 1,2-bis[(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)methyl]-
benzene (obix), respectively. Compound (1) consists of a cationic coordination
polymeric chain and 3-amino-4-carboxybenzenesulfonate (Hafsb) anions.
Compound (2) exhibits an asymmetric dinuclear structure. There are
hydrogen-bonded networks within the lattices of (1) and (2). Interestingly,
both (1) and (2) exhibit reversible dehydration–rehydration behaviour.
1. Introduction
Recently, chemists have accorded much attention to the
rational design and construction of metal–organic coordina-
tion polymers (MOCPs) with differing dimensionality because
MOCPs incorporate the advantages of the inorganic metal
ions and the organic linkers, resulting in fascinating archi-
tectures (Leong & Vittal, 2011; Zhou, He et al., 2016) and
potential applications in gas sorption (He et al., 2015), catalysis
(Wei et al., 2014), drug delivery (Gao et al., 2013), electro-
chemistry (Nafady et al., 2014), magnetism (Hawes et al., 2015),
sensing (Lv et al., 2015) and as energetic materials (Zhang,
Yang et al., 2016; Shu et al., 2017). Supramolecular coordina-
tion polymers (SCPs) are assembled by noncovalent van der
Waals forces, such as hydrogen bonding and – stacking
interactions. SCPs have aroused interest because they often
share the characteristics of conventional covalent-bonded
polymers and the properties originating from noncovalent
interactions, such as dynamic behaviour and high degrees of
internal ordered supramolecular assemblies (Reger et al.,
2014; Zhang, Luo et al., 2011; Karthikeyan et al., 2016; Zhou,
# 2018 International Union of Crystallography Yan et al., 2016).
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials and characterization
The flexible N-donor nitrogeneous ligands bth and obix
were synthesized according to literature procedures (Yang et
al., 2008; Liu et al., 2012). All other reagents were purchased
commercially and used without further purification. Solid-
state UV–Vis–NIR diffuse reflectance spectra were recorded
on a finely ground sample with a Cary 5000 spectro-
photometer. Diffuse reflectivity was measured from 200 to
1600 nm using polytetrafluoroethylene as a standard with
Recently, we have paid special attention to the construction 100% reflectance. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was
of new SCPs based on multifunctional 2-amino-5-sulfobenzoic recorded on a NETZSCH STA 409 PG/PC instrument from
acid (H2afsb). It is expected that H2afsb may exhibit a variety room temperature to 1273 K at a heating rate of 10 K min1
of roles during the assembly process. The pendant carboxylic under an N2 atmosphere. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD)
acid, sulfonic acid and amino groups could not only play a role data were collected on a computer-controlled Bruker D8
in directing bonding but could also have the potential to act as Advance XRD diffractometer equipped with Cu K radiation
hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors, resulting in extended ( = 1.5418 Å) at a scanning rate of 0.02 s1 from 5 to 50 .
high-dimensional supramolecular networks.
During the past decade, CuII coordination compounds have 2.2. Synthesis and crystallization
attracted much interest due to their pleasing architectures and 2.2.1. Synthesis of (1). To a solution of H2afsb (0.044 g,
interesting functional properties, such as fluorescence (Dhibar 0.2 mmol) and NaOH (0.004 g, 0.1 mmol) in water (5 ml) was
et al., 2017), magnetism (Almáši et al., 2016), electrochemistry added a solution of CuSO45H2O (0.024 g, 0.1 mmol) in water
(Wang, Luan, Lin et al., 2013) and photocatalysis (Hussain et (3 ml). To the resulting blue solution, aqueous bth (3 ml,
al., 2016). 0.044 g, 0.2 mmol) was added and the solution filtered. The
On the basis of the aforementioned considerations, we filtrate was kept at room temperature for slow evaporation.
selected H2afsb to react with CuII in the presence of the After about 3 d, blue crystals of (1) suitable for single-crystal
Acta Cryst. (2018). C74, 332–341 Li and Zhang A copper(II) coordination polymer and a dinuclear structure 333
research papers
Table 1
Experimental details.
(1) (2)
Crystal data
Chemical formula [Cu(C10H16N6)2(H2O)2](C7H6NO5S)22H2O [Cu2(C7H5NO5S)2(C14H14N4)2(H2O)2]3H2O
Mr 1008.55 1124.10
Crystal system, space group Orthorhombic, Pba2 Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K) 296 293
a, b, c (Å) 13.7110 (14), 19.1598 (19), 8.9327 (8) 18.787 (2), 12.0409 (12), 20.699 (2)
, , ( ) 90, 90, 90 90, 99.905 (4), 90
V (Å3) 2346.6 (4) 4612.6 (8)
Z 2 4
Radiation type Mo K Mo K
(mm1) 0.63 1.09
Crystal size (mm) 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.26 0.25 0.22
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker SMART CCD area detector Bruker SMART CCD area detector
Absorption correction Empirical (using intensity measurements) Empirical (using intensity measurements)
(SADABS; Bruker, 2008) (SADABS; Bruker, 2008)
Tmin, Tmax 0.828, 0.882 0.760, 0.786
No. of measured, independent and observed 20614, 5240, 4419 47208, 10554, 7450
[I > 2 (I)] reflections
Rint 0.026 0.040
(sin /)max (Å1) 0.650 0.650
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2 (F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.034, 0.091, 1.03 0.045, 0.121, 1.03
No. of reflections 5240 10554
No. of parameters 296 640
No. of restraints 1 0
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained H-atom parameters constrained
max, min (e Å3) 0.30, 0.17 0.74, 0.79
Absolute structure Flack x determined using 1740 quotients –
[(I+) (I)]/[(I+) + (I)] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Absolute structure parameter 0.003 (6) –
Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2008), SAINT (Bruker, 2008), SHELXS2017 (Sheldrick, 2015a), SHELXL2017 (Sheldrick, 2015b), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2005) and
Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008).
X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained (yield 62.2%, based 1.2Ueq(N,O). The H atoms of the water molecules were initi-
on H2afsb). FT–IR (KBr, , cm1): 3470 (s), 3355 (s), 3445 (m), ally located from a difference Fourier map, but were subse-
2933 (m), 1695 (s), 1609 (vs), 1532 (s), 1292 (s), 1234 (s), 1138 quently refined as riding, with O—H = 0.85 (1) Å, H H =
(vs), 1033 (s), 688 (m), 582 (m). 1.39 (1) Å and Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O).
2.2.2. Synthesis of (2). To an aqueous solution (6 ml) of
H2afsb (0.022 g, 0.1 mmol) and NaOH (0.004 g, 0.1 mmol) was
added a solution of CuSO45H2O (0.024 g, 0.1 mmol) in water 3. Results and discussion
(6 ml). To this mixed blue aqueous solution, a methanol 3.1. Syntheses of complexes (1) and (2)
solution (6 ml) of obix (0.0274 g, 0.1 mmol) was added and the
We should point out the differences in the syntheses of the
resulting solution filtered after about 4 h. The filtrate was kept
two title compounds, notably that for compound (1) only a
at room temperature for about 3 d, after which time blue
half equivalent of NaOH per H2asfb was used, while for
crystals were obtained (yield 43.2%, based on H2afsb). FT–IR
compound (2), there was one equivalent of NaOH. A poly-
(KBr, , cm1): 3448 (s), 3323 (s), 3141 (m), 1625 (vs), 1577
crystalline mixture was obtained if other molar ratios were
(m), 1481 (w), 1433 (s), 1337 (m), 1375 (w), 1270 (m), 1212 (s),
used.
1155 (s), 1106 (s), 1030 (s), 838 (m), 733 (m), 675 (s), 598 (s).
334 Li and Zhang A copper(II) coordination polymer and a dinuclear structure Acta Cryst. (2018). C74, 332–341
research papers
Figure 1
The coordination environment of the CuII ion in (1). The H atoms, apart from those of the water molecules and amino group of the Hafsb anion, have
been omitted for clarity. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry codes: (i) x, y + 2, z; (ii) x + 1, y + 2, z; (iii)
x 1, y, z; (vii) x + 1, y, z.]
Table 2 Table 3
Selected geometric parameters (Å, ) for (1). Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, ) for (1).
Cu1—N1 2.010 (2) Cu1—O2W 2.315 (4) D—H A D—H H A D A D—H A
Cu1—N6ii 2.015 (2) Cu1—O1W 2.461 (4)
C8—H8B N2iv 0.97 2.49 3.365 (5) 151
N1—Cu1—N1i 178.03 (18) N6ii—Cu1—O2W 90.74 (9) N7—H7C O4v 0.86 2.52 3.344 (4) 160
N1—Cu1—N6ii 89.90 (9) N1—Cu1—O1W 89.02 (9) O3W—H3WB O5v 0.85 1.90 2.737 (5) 170
N1i—Cu1—N6ii 90.08 (9) N6ii—Cu1—O1W 89.26 (9) O3W—H3WA O1vi 0.84 2.07 2.740 (4) 136
N6ii—Cu1—N6iii 178.52 (18) O2W—Cu1—O1W 180.0 O2—H2A O3W vii 0.82 1.79 2.603 (4) 172
N1—Cu1—O2W 90.98 (9) O2W—H2W O4iii 0.84 2.16 2.981 (6) 163
O2W—H2W O3iii 0.84 2.46 3.092 (4) 133
Symmetry codes: (i) x; y þ 2; z; (ii) x þ 1; y þ 2; z; (iii) x 1; y; z. O1W—H1W O4viii 0.85 2.16 2.996 (6) 170
Symmetry codes: (iii) x 1; y; z; (iv) x þ 12; y þ 32; z; (v) x 12; y þ 32; z; (vi)
in the equatorial plane. Compound (1) displays a clear Jahn– x þ 1; y þ 1; z; (vii) x þ 1; y; z; (viii) x 1; y; z þ 1.
Figure 2
The one-dimensional necklace-like cationic chain of (1). The lattice Hafsb acts as a counter-anion and hydrogen bonds with the cationic chain.
Acta Cryst. (2018). C74, 332–341 Li and Zhang A copper(II) coordination polymer and a dinuclear structure 335
research papers
Figure 3
The two-dimensional supramolecular cationic network of (1), formed
Figure 4
through interchain C8—H8B N2iv hydrogen bonds. The lattice Hafsb
The two-dimensional supramolecular anionic layer of (1), formed
anions and the lattice water molecules have been omitted for clarity.
through hydrogen bonds between the lattice Hafsb anions and water
molecules.
O3W—H3WA O1vi and O2—H2A O3W vii (Table 3),
further link the Hafsb anions together, yielding a two- structure (Fig. 6). Within the asymmetric unit, there are two
dimensional supramolecular anionic layer (Fig. 4). The R22 (4) crystallographically independent CuII ions, two bridging
hydrogen-bonded rings formed between two symmetric afsb2 ligands, two bridging obix ligands, two coordinated
sulfonate O4 atoms from two interstitial Hafsb anions and water molecules and three lattice water molecules. Both CuII
two coordinated water molecules (O1W and O2W) from atoms are pentacoordinated by two obix N atoms (N1 and N6
adjacent two-dimensional cationic layers (O1W—H1W for Cu1, and N4 and N9 for Cu2), two O atoms from two
O4viii and O2W—H2W O4iii; Table 3) result in the formation afsb2 ligands (O1 and O6 for Cu1, and O2 and O7 for Cu2)
of an interesting three-dimensional supramolecular network and one O atom from water (O1W for Cu1 and O2W for Cu2),
in which the two-dimensional cationic layers and the anionic and exhibit a distorted trigonal biyramidal configuration. The
layers are arrayed in an alternating fashion (Fig. 5). Cu—N bond lengths around the Cu1 and Cu2 ions are in the
range 1.957 (2)–1.974 (2) Å (Table 4), which are similar to
those in reported copper(II) complexes with the same obix
3.3. Structural description of (2) ligand, for example, [Cu2(L2)(1,2-bix)2(H2O)4]8H2O (H4L2 is
Complex (2) crystallizes in the monoclinic space group benzene-1,2,3,4-tetracarboxylic acid; Yang et al., 2008) and
P21/c and exhibits an asymmetric dinuclear paddlewheel {[Cu(-obix)2(H2O)2]2HCO2}n (Semerci et al., 2015). The
Figure 5
The three-dimensional supramolecular network of (1), showing the alternately arranged two-dimensional cationic layers and anionic layers.
336 Li and Zhang A copper(II) coordination polymer and a dinuclear structure Acta Cryst. (2018). C74, 332–341
research papers
Table 5
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, ) for (2).
D—H A D—H H A D A D—H A
Figure 7
A perspective view of the one-dimensional hydrogen-bonded tape in (2), which links the dinuclear units.
Acta Cryst. (2018). C74, 332–341 Li and Zhang A copper(II) coordination polymer and a dinuclear structure 337
research papers
Figure 10
The TGA curves of (1) and (2).
Figure 11
The PXRD patterns for (1), showing the simulated XRD pattern
calculated from the single-crystal X-ray diffraction data with Mercury
Figure 9 (black; Macrae et al., 2008), the sample as-synthesized (red), after
A view of the three-dimensional supramolecular network in (2), formed removal of the water molecules at 373 K (green) and after exposure in
through interlayer hydrogen bonds (purple dashed lines). water vapour for ca 3 d at room temperature (blue).
338 Li and Zhang A copper(II) coordination polymer and a dinuclear structure Acta Cryst. (2018). C74, 332–341
research papers
Figure 14
The diffuse reflectance UV–Vis–NIR spectrum of (Ahv)1/2 versus hv (eV)
of (1).
Figure 12
The PXRD patterns for (2), showing the simulated XRD pattern
calculated from single-crystal X-ray diffraction data with Mercury (black; immersed samples show similar PXRD patterns to the related
Macrae et al., 2008), the sample as-synthesized (red), after removal of the simulated patterns of (1) and (2) calculated from the single-
water molecules at 468 K (green) and after exposure in water vapour for crystal X-ray diffraction data. The results prove that the
ca 3 d at room temperature (blue).
dehydrated samples re-absorb water and revert to the original
structures. Therefore, the dehydration and rehydration beha-
mental diffraction patterns of both bulk samples are consistent viours of (1) and (2) are completely reversible and they can be
with the simulated patterns calculated from the single-crystal called ‘recoverable collapsing’ supramolecular networks. They
X-ray diffraction data with Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008), may serve as potential water-absorbent materials (Liu et al.,
indicating that the products are homogeneous pure phases. 2009; Shi et al., 2017).
The cyclic dehydration and rehydration behaviour of com-
plexes (1) and (2) were investigated via variable-temperature
PXRD in combination with the hydration process detailed 3.6. Optical properties
below. On heating the as-synthesized samples to 373 K for (1) It has been well documented that a common and convenient
and 468 K for (2), the PXRD patterns of the dehydrated method for determining whether a band gap is indirect or
samples of (1) (Fig. 11) and (2) (Fig. 12) show that the peak direct is to use the UV–Vis absorption spectrum (Guo et al.,
patterns become broader, peak shifts occur and the diffraction 2011). The UV–Vis–NIR absorption spectra of H2afsb, bth,
intensity becomes weaker. Thus, the structures of the dehy- obix, (1) and (2) are shown in Fig. 13. In the spectra of the free
drated phases of (1) and (2) have changed. Both dehydrated organic compounds, the bands around 228 and 262 nm for
samples were cooled to room temperature and kept in water obix, at 235 and 309 nm for bth, and at 234 and 283 nm for
vapour for about 3 d. Remarkably, the water-vapour- H2afsb can be attributed to the –* transitions. In the spectra
of complexes (1) and (2), the –* transition bands were red-
Figure 13 Figure 15
The solid-state UV–Vis–NIR absorption spectra for H2afsb, bth, obix, (1) The diffuse reflectance UV–Vis–NIR spectrum of (Ahv)1/2 versus hv (eV)
and (2). of (2).
Acta Cryst. (2018). C74, 332–341 Li and Zhang A copper(II) coordination polymer and a dinuclear structure 339
research papers
shifted to 254 and 335 nm, which may be attributed to the Dhibar, S., Ghosh, D., Dey, A., Mondal, R. K. & Dey, B. (2017). J.
coordination effect of the ligands. The broad absorption band Mol. Liq. 241, 74–80.
Du, M., Li, C. P., Liu, C. S. & Fang, S. M. (2013). Coord. Chem. Rev.
around 619 nm for (1) and 784 nm for (2) in the UV to NIR
257, 1282–1305.
region may be due to the d–d transition of the CuII ion with a Du, X. D., Li, C. H., Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Ma, Y. & You, X. Z. (2011).
d9 configuration (Xu et al., 2013; Dai et al., 2014). CrystEngComm, 13, 2350–2357.
To further investigate the semiconductor properties of (1) Gao, P. F., Zheng, L. L., Liang, L. J., Yang, X. X., Li, Y. F. & Huang,
and (2), the experimental absorbance data were transformed C. Z. (2013). J. Mater. Chem. B, 1, 3202–3208.
Gong, W. J., Ren, Z. G., Li, H. X., Zhang, J. G. & Lang, J. P. (2017).
to a bandgap energy (Eg) according to the Kubelka–Munk
Cryst. Growth Des. 17, 870–881.
function: (Ahv)1/2 = B(hv Eg), where B is a constant Guo, J., Ma, J. F., Liu, B., Kan, W. Q. & Yang, J. (2011). Cryst. Growth
corresponding to the material itself (Okubo et al., 2013; Zhang, Des. 11, 3609–3621.
Du et al., 2011). The energy band gaps (Eg) obtained by Hawes, C. S., Chilton, N. F., Moubaraki, B., Knowles, G. P., Chaffee, A.
extrapolation of the linear portion of the absorption edges are L., Murray, K. S., Batten, S. R. & Turner, D. R. (2015). Dalton
Trans. 44, 17494–17507.
estimated to be 1.93 eV for (1) (Fig. 14) and 3.11 eV for (2)
He, Y. P., Tan, Y. X. & Zhang, J. (2015). Inorg. Chem. 54, 6653–6656.
(Fig. 15). Hussain, N. & Bhardwaj, V. K. (2016). Dalton Trans. 45, 7697–
7707.
Karthikeyan, A., Thomas Muthiah, P. & Perdih, F. (2016). Acta Cryst.
4. Conclusions C72, 442–450.
Leong, W. L. & Vittal, J. J. (2011). Chem. Rev. 111, 688–764.
In summary, two copper(II) compounds based on the acid Li, Y. W., Li, D. C., Xu, J., Hao, H. G., Wang, S. N., Dou, J. M., Hu, T. L.
H2afsb and N-donor-flexible ligands have been prepared & Bu, X. H. (2014). Dalton Trans. 43, 15708–15712.
successfully and structurally characterized. Compound (1) is Lin, Y. N., Zhang, X. P., Chen, W. J., Shi, W. & Cheng, P. (2017). Inorg.
Chem. 56, 11768–11778.
an ionic one-dimensional coordination polymer, while com- Liu, Y. Y., Li, J., Ma, J. F., Ma, J. C. & Yang, J. (2012). CrystEngComm,
pound (2) is an asymmetric dinuclear complex. With the aid of 14, 169–177.
hydrogen bonding, (1) is extended into a three-dimensional Liu, Y. R., Li, L., Yang, T., Yu, X. & Su, C. Y. (2009). CrystEngComm,
supramolecular network, which consists of alternately 11, 2712–2718.
arranged two-dimensional cationic and anionic layers. A one- Lv, L. L., Yang, J., Zhang, H. M., Liu, Y. Y. & Ma, J. F. (2015). Inorg.
Chem. 54, 1744–1755.
dimensional hydrogen-bonded tape in (2) links the dinuclear Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe,
species into a two-dimensional supramolecular layer, which is P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. &
further extended into a three-dimensional supramolecular Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470.
hydrogen-bonded network. In (1), the Hafsb anion does not Nafady, A., O’Mullane, A. P. & Bond, A. M. (2014). Coord. Chem.
coordinate to the CuII ion, while in (2), the afsb2 anion acts as Rev. 268, 101–142.
Okubo, T., Anma, H., Tanaka, N., Himoto, K., Seki, S., Saeki, A.,
a bidentate bridging ligand. The N-donor-flexible organic Maekawa, M. & Kuroda-Sowa, T. (2013). Chem. Commun. 49,
linkers bth and obix have a big influence on the crystalline 4316–4318.
architectures of (1) and (2). Both (1) and (2) may be used as Parsons, S., Flack, H. D. & Wagner, T. (2013). Acta Cryst. B69, 249–
potential indirect band semiconductor materials. Most inter- 259.
estingly, (1) and (2) show a recyclable dehydration–rehydra- Reger, D. L., Leitner, A., Pellechia, P. J. & Smith, M. D. (2014). Inorg.
Chem. 53, 9932–9945.
tion behaviour. Semerci, F., Yeşilel, O. Z. & Yüksel, F. (2015). Polyhedron, 102, 1–7.
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
Funding information Shi, T., Chen, Y. G. & Ren, X. Y. (2017). New J. Chem. 41, 11215–
Funding for this research was provided by: Natural Science 11224.
Foundation of Jiangsu Province (grant No. BK2012680); Shi, D. B., Ren, Y. W., Jiang, H. F., Cai, B. W. & Lu, J. X. (2012). Inorg.
Chem. 51, 6498–6506.
Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher
Shu, Y., Yan, Y., Chen, J. Y., Xu, Q., Pang, H. & Hu, X. Y. (2017).
Education Institutions (PAPD). Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 9, 22342–22349.
Tian, A. X., Ying, J., Peng, J., Sha, J. Q., Pang, H. J., Zhang, P. P., Chen,
Y., Zhu, M. & Su, Z. M. (2008). Cryst. Growth Des. 8, 3717–3724.
References Wang, X. L., Luan, J., Lin, H. Y., Lu, Q. L., Xu, C. & Liu, G. C. (2013).
Almáši, M., Zeleňák, V., Zeleňáková, A., Vargová, Z. & Cı́sařová, I. Dalton Trans. 42, 8375–8386.
(2016). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 74, 66–71. Wang, X. L., Luan, J., Sui, F. F., Lin, H. Y., Liu, G. C. & Xu, C. (2013).
Arici, M. (2017). Cryst. Growth Des. 17, 5499–5505. Cryst. Growth Des. 13, 3561–3576.
Brandenburg, K. (2005). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Wei, N., Zhang, M. Y., Zhang, X. N., Li, G. M., Zhang, X. D. & Han,
Germany. Z. B. (2014). Cryst. Growth Des. 14, 3002–3009.
Bruker (2008). SADABS, SAINT and SMART. Bruker AXS Inc., Xu, W. T., Zhou, Y. F., Huang, D. C., Xiong, W., Su, M. Y., Wang, K.,
Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Han, S. & Hong, M. C. (2013). Cryst. Growth Des. 13, 5420–5432.
Chen, Y., Yang, J., Wang, X. C., Xu, Y. C., Xu, H. L., Zeng, X. S. & Xu, H., Zhou, B. Y., Yu, K., Su, Z. H., Zhao, Z. F., Sun, W. & Zhou,
Xiao, D. R. (2016). RSC Adv. 6, 5729–5738. B. B. (2015). New J. Chem. 39, 1301–1307.
Dai, M., Su, X. R., Wang, X., Wu, B., Ren, Z. G., Zhou, X. & Lang, J. P. Yang, J., Ma, J. F., Liu, Y. Y., Ma, J. C. & Batten, S. R. (2008). Cryst.
(2014). Cryst. Growth Des. 14, 240–248. Growth Des. 8, 4383–4393.
Dalrymple, S. A. & Shimizu, G. K. H. (2002). Chem. Commun. pp. Yao, X. Q., Cao, D. P., Hu, J. S., Li, Y. Z., Guo, Z. J. & Zheng, H. G.
2224–2225. (2011). Cryst. Growth Des. 11, 231–239.
340 Li and Zhang A copper(II) coordination polymer and a dinuclear structure Acta Cryst. (2018). C74, 332–341
research papers
Zhang, Y. C., Du, Z. N., Li, K. W., Zhang, M. & Dionysiou, D. D. Zhang, L., Zheng, J. D., Chen, Y. T., Zheng, S. R., Fan, J. & Zhang,
(2011). ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 3, 1528–1537. W. G. (2015). CrystEngComm, 17, 5538–5550.
Zhang, L., Li, C. J., He, J. E., Chen, Y. Y., Zheng, S. R., Fan, J. & Zhou, H. F., He, T., Yue, K. F., Liu, Y. L., Zhou, C. S., Yan, N. & Wang,
Zhang, W. G. (2016). J. Solid State Chem. 233, 444–454. Y. Y. (2016). Cryst. Growth Des. 16, 3961–3968.
Zhang, Z. B., Luo, Y., Chen, J. Z., Dong, S. Y., Yu, Y. H., Ma, Z. & Zhou, H. C. & Kitagawa, S. (2014). Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 5415–
Huang, F. H. (2011). Angew. Chem. 123, 1433–1437. 5418.
Zhang, S., Yang, Q., Liu, X. Y., Qu, X. N., Wei, Q., Xie, G., Chen, S. P. Zhou, Z. X., Yan, X. Z., Cook, T. R., Saha, M. L. & Stang, P. J. (2016).
& Gao, S. L. (2016). Coord. Chem. Rev. 307, 292–312. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 806–809.
Acta Cryst. (2018). C74, 332–341 Li and Zhang A copper(II) coordination polymer and a dinuclear structure 341
supporting information
supporting information
Computing details
For both structures, data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2008); cell refinement: SMART (Bruker, 2008); data reduction:
SAINT (Bruker, 2008); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS2017 (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine
structure: SHELXL2017 (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2005); software used to
prepare material for publication: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008).
catena-Poly[[diaquacopper(II)-µ-1,6-bis(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)hexane-κ2N4:N4′] bis(3-amino-4-
carboxybenzenesulfonate) dihydrate] (001)
Crystal data
[Cu(C10H16N6)2(H2O)2](C7H6NO5S)2·2H2O Dx = 1.427 Mg m−3
Mr = 1008.55 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, Pba2 Cell parameters from 9920 reflections
a = 13.7110 (14) Å θ = 2.6–27.4°
b = 19.1598 (19) Å µ = 0.63 mm−1
c = 8.9327 (8) Å T = 296 K
V = 2346.6 (4) Å3 Massive, blue
Z=2 0.3 × 0.25 × 0.2 mm
F(000) = 1054
Data collection
CCD area detector 5240 independent reflections
diffractometer 4419 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
phi and ω scans Rint = 0.026
Absorption correction: empirical (using θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 1.1°
intensity measurements) h = −13→17
(SADABS; Bruker, 2008) k = −24→24
Tmin = 0.828, Tmax = 0.882 l = −11→11
20614 measured reflections
Refinement
Refinement on F2 1 restraint
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.091 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0528P)2 + 0.1297P]
S = 1.03 where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
5240 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
296 parameters Δρmax = 0.30 e Å−3
Special details
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance
matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles;
correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate
(isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refined as a 2-component twin
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)
x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 0.1624 (3) 0.90465 (19) 0.8446 (4) 0.0601 (9)
H1 0.129851 0.895428 0.933794 0.072*
C2 0.1950 (2) 0.94757 (17) 0.6347 (4) 0.0505 (7)
H2 0.192804 0.973160 0.546285 0.061*
C3 0.3511 (3) 0.8832 (2) 0.5886 (5) 0.0666 (10)
H3A 0.356550 0.912201 0.499975 0.080*
H3B 0.343067 0.835253 0.556156 0.080*
C4 0.4439 (3) 0.8893 (2) 0.6792 (5) 0.0674 (10)
H4A 0.442899 0.855455 0.760020 0.081*
H4B 0.448043 0.935517 0.722990 0.081*
C5 0.5326 (3) 0.8764 (3) 0.5797 (5) 0.0781 (12)
H5A 0.538042 0.913901 0.507339 0.094*
H5B 0.523451 0.833124 0.524951 0.094*
C6 0.6274 (3) 0.8719 (2) 0.6706 (5) 0.0674 (10)
H6A 0.681578 0.884956 0.606605 0.081*
H6B 0.624328 0.905346 0.751917 0.081*
C7 0.6469 (2) 0.80038 (17) 0.7348 (5) 0.0614 (8)
H7A 0.662471 0.768751 0.653450 0.074*
H7B 0.587773 0.783484 0.782248 0.074*
C8 0.7292 (2) 0.79852 (18) 0.8482 (4) 0.0552 (8)
H8A 0.708689 0.822491 0.938550 0.066*
H8B 0.743115 0.750396 0.874260 0.066*
C9 0.9413 (3) 0.84857 (16) 0.6597 (5) 0.0594 (9)
H9 0.991834 0.842399 0.591617 0.071*
C10 0.8497 (2) 0.89557 (16) 0.8173 (4) 0.0482 (7)
H10 0.820187 0.927118 0.882163 0.058*
C11 0.8215 (2) 0.68972 (15) 0.2055 (4) 0.0468 (7)
C12 0.7237 (2) 0.67469 (14) 0.2423 (4) 0.0503 (7)
C13 0.6631 (2) 0.73038 (18) 0.2821 (4) 0.0579 (9)
H13 0.597941 0.721760 0.304079 0.070*
C14 0.6975 (2) 0.79707 (17) 0.2893 (4) 0.0539 (8)
H14 0.656068 0.833097 0.317896 0.065*
C15 0.7950 (2) 0.81165 (14) 0.2539 (4) 0.0453 (7)
C16 0.8551 (2) 0.75859 (14) 0.2110 (4) 0.0448 (7)
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y+2, z; (ii) −x+1, −y+2, z; (iii) x−1, y, z; (iv) x+1, y, z.
Symmetry codes: (iii) x−1, y, z; (iv) x+1, y, z; (v) x+1/2, −y+3/2, z; (vi) x−1/2, −y+3/2, z; (vii) −x+1, −y+1, z; (viii) x−1, y, z+1.
Bis(µ-2-amino-5-sulfonatobenzoato-κ2O1:O1′)bis{µ-1,2-bis[(1H-imidazol-1-yl)methyl]benzene-
κ2N3:N3′}bis[aquacopper(II)] trihydrate (002)
Crystal data
[Cu2(C7H5NO5S)2(C14H14N4)2(H2O)2]·3H2O F(000) = 2320
Mr = 1124.10 Dx = 1.619 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 18.787 (2) Å Cell parameters from 9870 reflections
b = 12.0409 (12) Å θ = 2.2–27.4°
c = 20.699 (2) Å µ = 1.09 mm−1
β = 99.905 (4)° T = 293 K
V = 4612.6 (8) Å3 Massive, green
Z=4 0.26 × 0.25 × 0.22 mm
Data collection
CCD area detector Absorption correction: empirical (using
diffractometer intensity measurements)
phi and ω scans (SADABS; Bruker, 2008)
Tmin = 0.760, Tmax = 0.786
Refinement
Refinement on F2 Hydrogen site location: mixed
Least-squares matrix: full H-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0587P)2 + 3.4892P]
wR(F2) = 0.121 where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.03 (Δ/σ)max = 0.002
10554 reflections Δρmax = 0.74 e Å−3
640 parameters Δρmin = −0.78 e Å−3
0 restraints
Special details
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance
matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles;
correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate
(isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)
x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 0.86921 (13) 1.1781 (2) 1.12680 (13) 0.0255 (6)
C2 0.89216 (15) 1.1639 (2) 1.19508 (14) 0.0310 (6)
C3 0.91954 (17) 1.2574 (2) 1.23217 (14) 0.0370 (7)
H3 0.935213 1.249487 1.277055 0.044*
C4 0.92371 (16) 1.3593 (2) 1.20401 (14) 0.0352 (7)
H4 0.941930 1.419394 1.229870 0.042*
C5 0.90099 (14) 1.3737 (2) 1.13720 (14) 0.0289 (6)
C6 0.87424 (14) 1.2832 (2) 1.09968 (13) 0.0268 (6)
H6 0.859071 1.292770 1.054837 0.032*
C7 0.83654 (14) 1.0871 (2) 1.08145 (14) 0.0276 (6)
C8 0.67367 (15) 1.2209 (2) 1.00930 (14) 0.0304 (6)
H8 0.713774 1.232767 1.041736 0.037*
C9 0.56369 (16) 1.2236 (3) 0.95644 (16) 0.0411 (8)
H9 0.514309 1.236385 0.944954 0.049*
C10 0.60638 (16) 1.1720 (3) 0.91948 (16) 0.0409 (8)
H10 0.591092 1.142680 0.877843 0.049*
C11 0.58234 (17) 1.3181 (3) 1.06622 (15) 0.0404 (7)
H11A 0.537096 1.287362 1.074633 0.049*
H11B 0.573178 1.393930 1.051223 0.049*
C12 0.63549 (15) 1.3194 (2) 1.12894 (14) 0.0311 (6)
C13 0.63425 (15) 1.2414 (2) 1.17913 (14) 0.0299 (6)
C14 0.68443 (17) 1.2496 (3) 1.23635 (15) 0.0399 (7)
H14 0.683355 1.198565 1.269894 0.048*
C15 0.73598 (18) 1.3323 (3) 1.24437 (17) 0.0478 (9)
H15 0.769723 1.336213 1.282854 0.057*
C16 0.73737 (18) 1.4086 (3) 1.19554 (18) 0.0478 (9)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y−1, z; (ii) −x+2, −y+2, −z+2; (iii) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+3/2; (iv) x, −y+3/2, z−1/2; (v) x, −y+3/2, z+1/2; (vi) x, y+1, z; (vii) −x+1, −y+2,
−z+2.