Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Richard Hart
Labour Rebellions of the 1930s in the British Caribbean
Region Colonies
Published 2002 jointly by Caribbean Labour Solidarity and the Socialist
History Society.
ISBN of printed version: 0 9537742 3 6
In the 1930s British colonies were spread right across the Caribbean region.
In the west, on the Central American mainland, was Belize (then British
Honduras). In the centre-north, some 600 miles east of Belize, lay the largest
island Jamaica (100 miles south of Cuba), the tiny Cayman Islands (just off
Cuba’s south coast) and the chain of numerous small Bahama and Turks &
Caicos Islands (off the northern coasts of Cuba, Haiti and the Dominican
Republic). Some 1000 miles to the east, forming the boundary of the
Caribbean Sea, lay an arc of small islands stretching southwards from the
British Virgin Islands for over 400 miles. These were, from north to south
(separated mid-way by two French islands) St Kitts, Antigua, Montserrat,
Dominica, St. Lucia and Grenada. About 100 miles to the east of this chain
lay Barbados. 100 miles to the south (just off the northern coast of South
America) lay the larger island of Trinidad and its associated small island
Tobago. 150 miles to the south-east of Trinidad and just outside of the
Caribbean Sea lay Guyana (then British Guiana), on the South American
mainland.
In the 1930s, apart from the regional organisations established by the sugar
manufacturers and the governing bodies of the sport of cricket, there was
little or no inter-colony contact. There had been migration to Trinidad of
workers from the smaller eastern Caribbean islands, particularly Grenada, for
employment in the oil industry. There had also been migration from these
islands and Barbados to Guyana. But apart from these migrations, the
workers in each colony had remained isolated from their counterparts in the
other colonies.
Prior to 1932 the only colonies in the region in which it had been lawful to
form a trade union had been Jamaica and Guyana, but the legislation did not
permit peaceful picketing of employers’ premises and the Jamaican
legislation did not protect trade unionists from actions for breach of contract
in the event of strikes. Although illegal, the Trinidad Workingmens
Association (TWA) had since its formation in 1897, in addition to its other
functions, engaged in trade union activities. In 1932, on the advice of
Secretary of State Lord Passfield (formerly Sidney Webb), legislation similar
to the Jamaican statute was enacted in Trinidad & Tobago, Grenada and St
Lucia but trade unions continued to be illegal in the remaining British
colonies in the region.
The principal causes of working class unrest and dissatisfaction were the
same throughout the region: low wages; high unemployment and under-
employment; arrogant racist attitudes of the colonial administrators and
employers in their relations with black workers; lack of adequate or in most
cases any representation; and, no established structure for the resolution of
industrial disputes by collective bargaining. Another factor increasing general
distress and dissatisfaction regionally was the world economic crisis which
had started in the USA in 1929 and by the early 1930s was having a residual
effect internationally. The fact that the grievances caused by these factors
existed in all these colonies explains why, despite the lack of inter-colony
contacts, the labour rebellions of the 1930s were an inter-colony
phenomenon, sweeping like a wave across the region.
“Leaders were appointed and a march round the town arranged. After the
march the leaders met the Governor by appointment. The leaders were men
of the artisan and labouring classes. … The deputation represented to the
Governor that their families were starving because the men could not get
work.”5
The Governor promised immediate relief for the hungry and announced that
the unemployed should register at the Belize Town Board, but the deputation
was not satisfied as they wanted a cash dole of $1.00 per day. Nevertheless,
1,100 men and 300 women registered. It was at this point that Antonio
Soberanis Gomez, a barber by trade who had been holding public meetings
expressing popular dissatisfaction, denounced the leaders of the Unemployed
Brigade as being insufficiently militant, and emerged as the most popular
leader. He organised a petition demanding that the Government find work for
the unemployed at $1.50 per day. In August 1934 he led a protest march of
about 3,000. In September he organised a strike of stevedores in Stan Creek,
the second largest town, which won an increase of pay from 8 cents to 25
cents per hour.6
In May 1935 there was a strike of Railway workers at Stan Creek, in the
organisation with which Soberanis was involved. Police reinforcements were
brought in from Belize City and the intimidated strikers returned to work.
Soberanis was prosecuted for using seditious language at a public meeting on
1 October in Corozal. The Governor explained his reasons for selecting a
particular Magistrate to conduct the trial: “One of my reasons for sending
[Magistrate E A] Grant to try ‘Tony’ was that he was a black man. I did not
want the trial to be a black v. white affair”. He wanted, said the Governor,
that Soberanis should be “put away for a good long sentence”. Soberanis was
also charged before the Supreme Court with attempting to “bring His Majesty
into hatred, ridicule and contempt”.
In 1933 and 1934 there was labour unrest in Trinidad. On 19 June 1933 a
hunger march took place in the capital Port of Spain, organised by a group
calling themselves the National Unemployed Movement. The demonstrators
demanded relief work for the unemployed and the restoration of rent controls
which had been abandoned. The same group organised a similar, but larger
march of some 400 to 500 in the following year.10
On 28 January 1935 cane cutters refused to start reaping the new sugar cane
crop on the Shadwell plantation, on the outskirts of Basseterre, the capital of
St Kitts. The employers had offered work at 8 pence (16 cents) per ton, a rate
which the workers had been forced to accept under protest for reaping the
previous years’ crop. News of their refusal to work spread quickly to
adjoining plantations where workers also refused to start the crop. A new
spirit of determination to fight for their rights spread throughout the island as
groups of workers went from plantation to plantation on foot. They prevented
work from starting or, in the few places where the cutting of canes had
commenced, they persuaded the workers to cease work. A general strike of
sugar workers very soon developed.
Workers at the island’s sugar factory also came out on strike, demanding a
wage increase. Their wages had been reduced by one penny in the shilling in
1930 and subsequently by a further one penny. On 29 January some 200 to
300 workers, some armed with sticks, entered the yard at Buckley’s
plantation. The manager and overseer ordered them to leave but they refused
to do so. Stones were thrown and, either before or after the stone throwing –
it is not clear when, the manager fired his gun into the crowd injuring several
workers. Armed police arrived under the command of a former British Army
major, but the workers refused to obey his order to disperse, demanding that
the manager be arrested.
Windows of the Court House were smashed and motor cars of some officials
were damaged. There were shouts of “We can’t stand more duties on food or
clothing” and cries of “We have no work. We are hungry”. The alarmed
Governor adjourned the session of the Council. As he and other officials
emerged from the Council Chamber, the Governor was pushed and struck
and the Attorney General, who had drafted the tax measures, was cuffed by
an enraged protester. In the ensuing riot a crowd broke into the prison
releasing the ten prisoners there and the business premises of F A Corea, a
member of the Council and the island’s largest merchant and plantation
owner, were ransacked.
Following the arrival of an armed police force, the Riot Act was read and the
crowd was fired upon. One person was killed and several were injured. News
travels fast in a small island and the rioting soon spread to Georgetown,
twenty miles to the south, and Chateaubelair the same distance to the north.
Telephone wires were cut and several bridges were destroyed. Military
“Volunteers” were rushed in from other islands and armed police and
Volunteers were posted to guard the cable and wireless station and the
electricity plant. At midnight on 21 October a British warship arrived. On 22
October a state of emergency was proclaimed.
Though the disorder in Kingstown had subsided by the end of the first day,
disorders in the rural areas, where many plantation workers were involved,
continued for the next two days. The police met particularly strong resistance
at Byera’s Hill, Campden Park and Stubbs, where demands for land and for
higher wages were heard. The state of emergency was continued for three
weeks.19
In Kingstown the working class leader who had played the principal
agitational role was Sheriff Lewis. He was popularly known as “Selassie”
because of his advocacy of the cause of Ethiopia, then being invaded by Italy.
Bertha Mutt, who was also mentioned in a similar role, was known as
“Mother Selassie”. These nick-names are interesting because they show that,
even in a far away Caribbean island, there was concern about an invasion by
a European power of this independent African kingdom. On 23 November
George McIntosh, who had by then become the acknowledged leader of the
workers, was arrested on a charge of treason felony, although he had tried to
restore calm during the disturbance. The case against him collapsed at the
preliminary examination before the Magistrate.20
At the end of 1935 there was a strike of coal loaders in St Lucia. With the
recent events in St Kitts and St Vincent very much in mind, the Governor
mobilised the local military force and called upon the British Government for
reinforcements. A warship was quickly on the scene and for several days and
nights marines patrolled the streets of the capital Castries and some rural
areas. At night the ship’s searchlights illuminated the city. Faced with this
massive show of force, the strikers returned to work, to await the report of an
official commission of inquiry set up to consider their claims for wage
increases. Supported by so much military might, the commissioners felt
sufficiently secure to reject all their demands.21
Clement Payne, who had been born to Barbadian parents residing in Trinidad,
returned to Barbados in March 1937. Shortly after his arrival he began to
hold street meetings at Golden Square in Bridgetown, the capital, at which he
announced his intention to form a trade union. He had made arrangements to
rent a hall on 1 May to celebrate international labour day, but when the
proprietor discovered his purpose the arrangement was cancelled. Payne’s
meetings attracted increasingly large crowds of workers. Others who assisted
him with his plan to launch a trade union were F A Chase, Olrick Grant,
Mortimer Skeete, Israel Lovell and Darnley Alleyne.
Alarmed at these activities, the Government took action. On entering the
island Payne had declared that he had been born in Barbados. This proved to
be untrue, although he had believed it to be true. He was nevertheless
prosecuted for knowingly making a false declaration and fined £10, but
appealed and was granted bail. On the next day he led a march to
Government House, demanding to see the Governor. Payne and several
others were arrested and he was refused a renewal of his bail. While in
custody awaiting trial he was served with a deportation order.
Payne had been unrepresented at his trial as he had been unable to pay the fee
of Grantley Adams, the lawyer he had sought to employ. His followers
however took up a collection and raised the money to pay Adams to represent
him at the appeal. The appeal, heard on 26 July, was successful, but Payne
was not released from custody. Instead, during the night, he was secretly
placed aboard a schooner and deported to Trinidad. The Trinidad police were
waiting for him and arrested him on a charge of possessing prohibited
literature. When it became known that Payne had been deported there was an
angry public reaction. On the night of 27 July a large crowd was addressed by
his principal supporters. Next day there was widespread rioting in the city:
“Shop windows were smashed, cars were pushed into the sea, passers by
were attacked, police patrols, caught unarmed and unawares, fled beneath a
hail of bottles and stones … During the next two days the ‘trouble’ spread to
the rural parishes where a few lawless souls stoned cars on the highways
while bolder spirits among the hungry poor took advantage of the general
fear and confusion to break into shops and raid sweet potato fields … Shops
remained closed, work came to a standstill in town and country alike.”22
The report of the Wages Board, appointed by the Government of Trinidad &
Tobago in 1935, was a great disappointment to the workers. The members of
the Board had been required to draw up a Cost of Living Index and, possibly
as a result of the report, no legal minimum wage had been established. As
one observer commented, the Board “by using questionable indices for
assessing the real needs … , gave the impression that few workers were being
paid substandard wages”.24 Cipriani had signed the report and this, together
with other signs of his growing conservatism, had by 1936 caused most
workers to lose confidence in him and the Trinidad Labour Party.25
Within two days of this event a strike had engulfed the oilfields. Strikes in
other industries and occupations soon followed and before long the entire
economy had been paralysed by a general strike. According to an editorial in
the Port Of Spain Gazette, it was a situation “which assumed a proportion
previously unknown in the history of labour agitation” in the colony. A state
of emergency was declared and two British warships were rushed to the
island, arriving on 22 and 23 June. Marines and sailors were landed and
thirteen police officers were brought in from England and two from Ireland.
In addition to the constabulary the local military forces – the Trinidad
Infantry Volunteers and the Trinidad Light Horse – were mobilised.
Numerous arrests and imprisonments followed, but Butler was not arrested
until September. He was subsequently tried and sentenced to two years
imprisonment for sedition.27
The attitude adopted by the Governor, Sir Murchison Fletcher, and the
Colonial Secretary, Howard Nankivel, contributed to the restoration of calm,
which had been restored by the end of July. Both had admitted publicly that
wages were too low and that the employers in the oil and sugar industries and
the Government had an obligation to ensure that workers were treated fairly
and properly remunerated. But the principal share-holders in these mainly
foreign owned industries were influential with Government circles in Britain
and very soon the Governor was forced to retire and the Colonial Secretary
was transferred to another colony.
In the first quarter of 1937 the growing unrest among peasants, many of
whom both farmed their own or rented plots of land and also worked part
time on larger properties, and landless agricultural workers, found
organisational expression in upper Clarendon in central Jamaica. Robert E
Rumble, a small farmer who had returned from Cuba where he had acquired
the trade of a coach builder and wheelwright, had formed an organisation
which he called the Poor Man’s Improvement and Land Settlement
Association. By March 1938 he claimed a membership of 800 for his
organisation. On 23 April 1938 this organisation addressed a Petition to the
Governor:
“We are the Sons of Slaves who have been paying rent to the Landlords for
fully many decades we want better wages, we have been exploited for years
and we are looking to you to help us. We want a Minimum Wage Law. We
want freedom in this the hundredth year of our Emancipation. We are still
economic slaves, burdened in paying rent to Landlords who are sucking out
our vitalities.”28
Agitation was conducted by Rumble and his organisation for land for the
peasants and proto-peasants and for better wages for agricultural workers. A
movement to refuse to pay any more rent to landlords began to spread and, in
some areas, land hungry people seized estate lands. This was fuelled by the
revival of a widely held belief that Queen Victoria had promised that, 100
years after their emancipation, the slaves who had got nothing at the time of
the abolition of slavery would inherit the land. Tenants and others who seized
lands began to erect fences and offered to pay taxes on the lands the
ownership of which they claimed to have acquired.29
During the first quarter of 1938, large numbers of workers had been
converging on Westmoreland at the western end of the island, attracted by the
possibility of employment. On 2 May the Daily Gleaner published this
report:
“The old factory on the estate, which up to Friday had been grinding canes, is
entirely in the hands of the strikers … I hear rifle firing, followed by shrieks
and cries … I can see men on the ground. Some are motionless, others are
staggering to and fro or crawling away on their hands and knees. The strike
has culminated in stark tragedy. A few minutes later I hear that three are
dead, eleven wounded and that the police are making many arrests.”33
Four people were killed that day, three by police gunshot and one by a police
bayonet. On 4 May the Gleaner reported that “the known cases of persons
suffering from wounds has not exceeded twenty-five, the arrests up to
yesterday afternoon reached 96”.34 But the wounded may have been more
numerous as there was a widespread belief that anyone who sought medical
treatment would be thereby identifying himself as a participant and inviting
arrest. On 13 May the first batch of 27 of the 109 strikers arrested was rushed
to trial before the Resident Magistrate at Savanna la Mar, charged with
“riotous assembly”. The sentences ranged from 30 days to 1 year’s
imprisonment. At the same time the Governor appointed a Commission to
enquire into the disorders.
A week later, realising that the only way to ease the situation was to release
Bustamante and Grant, the Government agreed to bail being granted. By that
time however the spirit of revolt had spread throughout the island and strikes
and demonstrations were occurring in every parish. This situation continued
for many weeks, despite the use of the battalion of British troops stationed on
the island to supplement the police. Workers were killed and injured and
many arrests took place.37
By the end of June calm had been restored. A number of factors had
contributed to this. Perhaps the most important had been the launching by
Bustamante of a trade union and assurances from him and the much respected
barrister N W Manley38 that the workers would receive proper
representation. The announcement on 14 June that a Royal Commission
would be arriving shortly to investigate conditions had undoubtedly created
expectations that improvements would be forthcoming. On 28 June Acting
Governor Woolley had announced in the Legislative Council that two loans
would be raised to finance land settlements and other infrastructural
developments.39
The number of labour disputes in Guyana, which had declined to two in 1936
and four in 1937, rose sharply in 1938. Between January and September in
1938 there were over thirty disputes involving over 12,000 workers.40 But
none of these strikes was called by the Man Power Citizens Association, the
trade union which had been formed in 1936 and was organising field workers
in the sugar industry for the first time, but had not yet been recognised by the
Sugar Producers Association.
While the members of the West India Royal Commission (see below) were in
Guyana taking evidence in February 1939, a major strike broke out at
Plantation Leonora. The strike had started among the field workers but, on 16
February, between 70 and 100 strikers entered the factory and persuaded the
factory workers to leave. This operation had been peaceful, but when armed
police arrived shortly afterwards and arrested five of the strikers, they were
pelted with stones and a large crowd assembled at the entrance to the factory.
Other police guarding the manager’s house were also stoned.
The police drove the strikers back with fixed bayonets and a police car was
damaged and its occupants injured. The police fired on the crowd, killing
four and four others were admitted to hospital with bullet wounds. In all
twenty-three were injured. On 2 March 1939, in a move to diffuse the rising
discontent, the Sugar Producers Association agreed to recognise the MPCA
as the bargaining agent of the workers. The Government appointed a
Commission of Enquiry into the events that had occurred at Leonora.41
Although the labour rebellions of the 1930s had swept like a wave across the
British colonies of the Caribbean region, there were some colonies in which
rebellions did not occur. Because of their very small size and the absence of
concentrations of workers either in urban centres or on plantations, no labour
rebellions occurred in the Bahamas, the Turks and Caicos Islands, the
Cayman Islands or the British Virgin Islands. There were also three islands –
Dominica, Grenada and Antigua – where, in the 1930s, although there were
plantations and distressing poverty existed, no labour rebellions occurred.
How is this to be explained?
A relevant factor in Dominica and Grenada may have been that in those
islands independent peasant farmers comprised a larger percentage of the
working population than in the other islands, but this was not the case in
Antigua. In Grenada a labour rebellion did subsequently occur but not until
1950-51, after the return to the island of Eric Gairy and Gascoigne Blaize
who had been working in the oil refinery in the Dutch colony of Aruba and
had been members of the Aruba Labour Union. What needs to be explained
in relation to Grenada therefore is not the absence of a rebellion but the time-
lag before it occured.
But there is no evidence that any such recommendations were made at this
time. A trade union had been formed in Grenada after this had become
legally possible there in 1933, but had not succeeded in attracting many
members. A possible, if speculative, factor contributing to the time-lag in the
outbreak of the rebellion may have been that the popular masses had greater
faith in the efficacy of political representations in Grenada then elsewhere.
Such an illusion may have been a by-product of the immense popularity and
reputation of T Albert Marryshow, Member of the Legislative Council,
whose orientation was entirely political.
The case of Antigua was entirely different to that of Grenada and Dominica.
Like the neighbouring island of St Kitts, Antigua in the 1930s was almost
entirely devoted to the production of sugar. But the clash between the
plantation owners and the workers did not develop there until 1951, by which
time the great majority of the workers were well organised and represented
by the Antigua Trades and Labour Union, an affiliate of the Caribbean
Labour Congress. The class conflict there took the form of a lock-out by the
employers and a general strike called by the Union which had reduced all
economic activity to a stand-still.
The decision of the British Government to appoint the West India Royal
Commission was a response to the cumulative effect of the labour rebellions
in the region. The idea, which may have originated in the Colonial Office,
was proposed soon after it became known in London that the wave of social
explosions had reached Jamaica. It was discussed at a Cabinet meeting on 25
May, after which the Secretary of State for the Colonies gave a somewhat
cynical explanation of the purpose it would serve:
“An early announcement that a Royal Commission was to visit the Islands
would have a good psychological effect in these Colonies. It would tend to
reassure their people that we here are keenly interested in their affairs, and
anxious to do what we can to help, and it would therefore tend to calm
excited feelings there.”43
The proposal having been cleared with the Prime Minister and by him with
the King, West Indian Governors were informed of it on 13 June and it was
announced next day in the House of Commons.44 The Commissioners took
written and oral evidence in London and in the colonies after their arrival
there in November 1938 and made their report on 21 December 1939. By that
time however Britain was at war with Germany and the conditions of poverty
in the colonies which the report disclosed were so appalling that, to avoid the
possibility of its being used in enemy propaganda, its publication was
suppressed. At the time, only the recommendations of the Commissioners
were published.45
Conclusion
The labour rebellions of the 1930s increased the self confidence of the
workers in these colonies and convinced them of the influence they could
exert by united action. The principal immediate benefit that the workers
derived from the rebellions was that they forced upon the Royal Commission,
and through its recommendations the British Government, a realisation of the
need to bring trade union legislation in all the colonies into line with
legislation in Britain.
Trade Unions were made lawful in those colonies where they had previously
been unlawful. In all the colonies legislation was amended or introduced
making peaceful picketing of employers’ premises lawful and giving trade
unionists immunity from actions for breach of contract as a result of strikes.
The organisation of trade unions followed in all the colonies and the
foundations were laid for the modern trade union movements, which continue
to contribute to the struggle for an improved standard of living.