Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RULE 6
KINDS OF PLEADINGS
Section 1. Pleadings defined. — Pleadings are Section 1. Pleadings defined. - Pleadings are
the written statements of the respective the written statements of the respective
claims and defenses of the parties submitted claims and defenses of the parties
to the court for appropriate judgment. (1a) submitted to the court for appropriate
judgment. (1)
Section 2. Pleadings allowed. — The claims of a Section 2. Pleadings allowed. - The claims of
party are asserted in a complaint, a party are asserted in a complaint,
counterclaim, cross-claim, third (fourth, etc.)- counterclaim, cross-claim, third (fourth,
party complaint, or complaint-in- etc.)-party complaint, or complaint-in-
intervention. intervention.
Section 3. Complaint. — The complaint is the Section 3. Complaint. - The complaint is the
pleading alleging the plaintiff's cause or pleading alleging the plaintiff’s or claiming
causes of action. The names and residences of party’s2 cause or causes of action. The
the plaintiff and defendant must be stated in names and residences of the plaintiff and
the complaint. (3a) defendant must be stated in the complaint.
(3a)
Section 5. Defenses. — Defenses may either be Section 5. Defenses. — Defenses may either
1
There is jurisprudence to the effect that if there is an actionable document
appended to an answer, one has to file a reply. It should only be in that instance that an
answer may be responded to by a reply, so that the parties will not take advantage of a
reply.
2
The term “plaintiff” or “claiming party” may refer to the counter-claimant, the
cross-claimant, or the third (fourth, etc.)-party plaintiff. The use of the term “claiming
party” under Section 3, Rule 6 is consistent with Section 4, Rule 6 which uses the term
“defending party,” and that law students usually confused that in counter-claim, cross-
claim and third-party claim, etc., the claimant becomes a plaintiff, as to such claim.
Page 1 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
(a) A negative defense is the specific denial of (a) A negative defense is the specific denial
the material fact or facts alleged in the of the material fact or facts alleged in the
pleading of the claimant essential to his cause pleading of the claimant essential to his or
or causes of action. her cause or causes of action.
3
Added lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, res judicata and litis pendentia
as grounds that may be included as affirmative defenses in the answer rather than in a
motion to dismiss.
Page 2 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
nature thereof, except that in an original amount and the nature thereof, except that
action before the Regional Trial Court, the in an original action before the Regional
counter-claim may be considered compulsory Trial Court, the counterclaim may be
regardless of the amount. (n) considered compulsory regardless of the
amount. A compulsory counterclaim not
raised in the same action is barred, unless
otherwise allowed by these Rules.4 (7a)
Section 10. Reply. — A reply is a pleading, the Section 10. Reply.6 — All new matters
office or function of which is to deny, or alleged in the answer are deemed
allege facts in denial or avoidance of new controverted. If the plaintiff wishes to
matters alleged by way of defense in the interpose any claims arising out of the new
answer and thereby join or make issue as to matters so alleged, such claims shall be set
such new matters. If a party does not file such forth in an amended or supplemental
4
Additional paragraph to codify the jurisprudential rule on the waiver of
compulsory counterclaim not raised in same action. (Financial Building v. Forbes Park
Association, G.R. No. 133119. August 17, 2000)
5
Last sentence of the original provision was simplified to avoid confusion.
6
Considering that a reply is only allowed if the answer is based on an actionable
document, and that an answer has been filed at this stage of the proceeding, the reply
can only be amended or a supplemental pleading can only be filed with leave of court,
and that the judge has an authority not to allow the reply on the part of the plaintiff.
The plaintiff could exercise the right of filing a reply or opt to simply amend. If there is
a reply and there is an actionable document, it becomes mandatory.
Under the 1st paragraph of Section 10, amendment is not a matter of right
because an answer has already been filed, while under the 2 nd paragraph thereof, the
filing of reply is still a matter of right if there is an actionable document only. The
purpose of the amendment is to limit the filing of a reply.
Page 3 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
reply, all the new matters alleged in the complaint. However, the plaintiff may file a
answer are deemed controverted. reply only if the defending party attaches
an actionable document to his or her
If the plaintiff wishes to interpose any answer.
claims arising out of the new matters so
alleged, such claims shall be set forth in an A reply is a pleading, the office or function
amended or supplemental complaint. (11) of which is to deny, or allege facts in denial
or avoidance of new matters alleged in, or
relating to, said actionable document.
Section 11. Third, (fourth, etc.)—party Section 11. Third, (fourth, etc.)-party
complaint. — A third (fourth, etc.) - party complaint. — A third (fourth, etc.)-party
complaint is a claim that a defending party complaint is a claim that a defending party
may, with leave of court, file against a person may, with leave of court, file against a
not a party to the action, called the third person not a party to the action, called the
(fourth, etc.) — party defendant for third (fourth, etc.)-party defendant for
contribution, indemnity, subrogation or any contribution, indemnity, subrogation or
other relief, in respect of his opponent's claim. any other relief, in respect of his or her
(12a) opponent's claim.
Section 12. Bringing new parties. — When the Section 12. Bringing new parties. — When
presence of parties other than those to the the presence of parties other than those to
original action is required for the granting of the original action is required for the
complete relief in the determination of a granting of complete relief in the
counterclaim or cross-claim, the court shall determination of a counterclaim or cross-
order them to be brought in as defendants, if claim, the court shall order them to be
jurisdiction over them can be obtained. (14) brought in as defendants, if jurisdiction
7
With respect to the third-party defendant which cannot be located, a fixed 30-day
period was suggested, in order to avoid delay.
8
The phrase “matters extraneous to the issue” is based on Firestone Tire and Rubber
Company v. Tempongko (G.R. No. L-24399, March 28, 1969).
Page 4 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 13. Answer to third (fourth, etc.)-party Section 13. Answer to third (fourth, etc.)-party
complaint. — A third (fourth, etc.)-party complaint. — A third (fourth, etc.)-party
defendant may allege in his answer his defendant may allege in his or her answer
defenses, counterclaims or cross-claims, his or her defenses, counterclaims or cross-
including such defenses that the third (fourth, claims, including such defenses that the
etc.)-party plaintiff may have against the third (fourth, etc.)-party plaintiff may have
original plaintiff's claim. In proper cases, he against the original plaintiff's claim. In
may also assert a counterclaim against the proper cases, he or she may also assert a
original plaintiff in respect of the latter's claim counterclaim against the original plaintiff
against the third-party plaintiff. (n) in respect of the latter's claim against the
third-party plaintiff. (13a)
RULE 7
PARTS AND CONTENTS9 OF A PLEADING
Section 1. Caption. — The caption sets forth Section 1. Caption. — The caption sets forth
the name of the court, the title of the action, the name of the court, the title of the action,
and the docket number if assigned. and the docket number if assigned.
The title of the action indicates the names The title of the action indicates the
of the parties. They shall all be named in the names of the parties. They shall all be
original complaint or petition; but in named in the original complaint or
subsequent pleadings, it shall be sufficient if petition; but in subsequent pleadings, it
the name of the first party on each side be shall be sufficient if the name of the first
stated with an appropriate indication when party on each side be stated with an
there are other parties. appropriate indication when there are
other parties.
Their respective participation in the case
shall be indicated. (1a, 2a) Their respective participation in the
case shall be indicated. (1)
Section 2. The body. — The body of the Section 2. The body. — The body of the
pleading sets forth its designation, the pleading sets forth its designation, the
allegations of the party's claims or defenses, allegations of the party's claims or
the relief prayed for, and the date of the defenses, the relief prayed for, and the date
pleading. (n) of the pleading.
(a) Paragraphs. — The allegations in the body (a) Paragraphs. — The allegations in the
of a pleading shall be divided into paragraphs body of a pleading shall be divided into
so numbered to be readily identified, each of paragraphs so numbered to be readily
which shall contain a statement of a single set identified, each of which shall contain a
9
The words “and Contents” of a pleading in view of the insertion of a new
provision under said Rule.
Page 5 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 3. Signature and Address. — Every Section 3. Signature and address.10 — (a)
pleading must be signed by the party or Every pleading and other written
counsel representing him, stating in either submissions to the court must be signed by
case his address which should not be a post the party or counsel representing him or
office box. her.
10
Address must still be stated. The intention was to delete part that the address
should not be a post office box, because what is used in practice is either office or
residential address. If post office box address is used, the receipt of a mail may be
delayed.
11
Patterned after Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which has proven
Page 6 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
to be an effective tool in preventing baseless and frivolous suits and dilatory tactics. It
makes the lawyer personally liable, without the ability to pass on the penalty to the
client.
12
Office of the Bar Confidant or Integrated Bar of the Philippines.
Page 7 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
13
There is a suggestion that all pleadings should be verified similar to the 1991
Revised Rule on Summary Procedure, in order to hold the parties liable. To avoid
controversy or delay as regards denial and admissions, all pleadings must be verified.
For instance, if an answer is filed denying an allegation, but there is failure to verify
under oath as required, then the allegation is deemed admitted. There was a suggestion
that lawyers should be given the chance to verify, if all pleadings are required to be
verified. However, it may be too burdensome to require all pleadings to be verified. In
intra-corporate cases, if the lawyer has an initial authority, he or she may verify. There
are lots of cases involving failure to deny under oath.
If there is already a reply, the filing of amended or supplemental pleading is with
leave of court, subject to Rule 10. If the defendant can file an amended or supplemental
pleading to answer the actionable document attached to the reply, because there
appears to be no provision how the defendant will answer a plaintiff’s reply with
attached actionable document. The remedy of the defendant is amendment of
pleadings. Such amendment must be with leave of court, because an answer has already
been filed. The purpose of the proposed amendments is to cut short the submission of
pleadings.
The Sub-Committee members suggested that there should be no further
pleadings after the reply, and that there should be no rejoinder, but there could be an
amended answer. However, creative lawyers may take advantage, if the filing of
amended answer after the reply will be allowed. Reply is only possible if the answer is
based on an actionable document. The defendant should be allowed to file a
supplement to contest the actionable document attached to the plaintiff’s reply.
Page 8 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
14
Usual practice if the party is abroad.
15
Once a complaint is filed, the plaintiff must already have a list of witnesses, and
their affidavits must be attached already to the complaint. This is because if pleadings
are evidentiary, complainants should be ready with all their witnesses and documents.
If there are crucial witnesses, the complaint should not yet be filed, more so if the
evidence is not complete. The policy is to lay down all cards in the complaint, and if
there are no witnesses, that is the plaintiff’s lookout. If the defendant cannot procure the
witness, the defendant must state in the answer the summary of the intende d testimony
and produce the judicial affidavit. It was the consensus that a party cannot come to the
court unless alternative dispute resolution has been exhausted.
16
Direct reference to A.M. No. 12-8-8-SC, otherwise known as the “Judicial
Affidavit Rule” was avoided because of the strict form required thereunder.
Page 10 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
RULE 8
MANNER OF MAKING ALLEGATIONS IN PLEADINGS
Section 1. In general. — Every pleading shall Section 1. In general. — Every pleading shall
contain in a methodical and logical form, a contain in a methodical and logical form, a
plain, concise and direct statement of the plain, concise and direct statement of the
ultimate facts on which the party pleading ultimate facts, including the evidence17 on
relies for his claim or defense, as the case may which the party pleading relies for his or her
be, omitting the statement of mere claim or defense, as the case may be.
evidentiary facts. (1)
If a cause of action18 or defense relied on is
If a defense relied on is based on law, the based on law, the pertinent provisions
pertinent provisions thereof and their thereof and their applicability to him or her
applicability to him shall be clearly and shall be clearly and concisely stated. (1a)
concisely stated. (n)
17
“Evidence” includes testimonial and evidentiary facts.
18
Original provision appears to be one-sided; hence the insertion of the phrase
“cause of action.”
Page 11 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 4. Capacity. — Facts showing the Section 4. Capacity. — Facts showing the
capacity of a party to sue or be sued or the capacity of a party to sue or be sued or the
authority of a party to sue or be sued in a authority of a party to sue or be sued in a
representative capacity or the legal existence representative capacity or the legal existence
of an organized association of person that is of an organized association of persons that
made a party, must be averred. A party is made a party, must be averred. A party
desiring to raise an issue as to the legal desiring to raise an issue as to the legal
existence of any party or the capacity of any existence of any party or the capacity of any
party to sue or be sued in a representative party to sue or be sued in a representative
capacity, shall do so by specific denial, which capacity, shall do so by specific denial,
shall include such supporting particulars as which shall include such supporting
are peculiarly within the pleader’s particulars as are peculiarly within the
knowledge. (4) pleader’s knowledge. (4)
Section 5. Fraud, mistake, condition of the mind. Section 5. Fraud, mistake, condition of the
— In all averments of fraud or mistake the mind. — In all averments of fraud or
circumstances constituting fraud or mistake mistake, the circumstances constituting
must be stated with particularity. Malice, fraud or mistake must be stated with
intent, knowledge, or other condition of the particularity. Malice, intent, knowledge, or
mind of a person may be averred generally. other condition of the mind of a person may
(5a) be averred generally. (5)
Section 7. Action or defense based on document. Section 7. Action or defense based on document.
— Whenever an action or defense is based - Whenever an action or defense is based
upon a written instrument or document, the upon a written instrument or document, the
19
If there is an averment that an action is barred by prior judgment, it is sufficient
under the present Rules but the judge will not see the judgment because it is not
attached to the pleading. If it will now be required that an authenticated copy of the
judgment be attached, the judge will be able to determine if indeed there is a bar by
prior judgment and if causes of action were litigated in that case. This will expedite the
proceedings because the judge can ask during trial what else should be discussed based
on the authenticated document. Moreover, stipulation is allowed already because the
document is already authenticated. There will be reduced delay because what is
happening is that if there is no authenticated copy, the adverse party will first ask the
production of the authenticated copy, resulting in delay.
Page 12 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 8. How to contest such documents. — Section 8. How to contest such documents. -
When an action or defense is founded upon a When an action or defense is founded upon
written instrument, copied in or attached to a written instrument, or attached to the
the corresponding pleading as provided in corresponding pleading as provided in the
the preceding section, the genuineness and preceding section, the genuineness and due
due execution of the instrument shall be execution of the instrument shall be deemed
deemed admitted unless the adverse party, admitted unless the adverse party, under
under oath specifically denies them, and sets oath specifically denies them, and sets forth
forth what he claims to be the facts, but the what he or she claims to be the facts; but the
requirement of an oath does not apply when requirement of an oath does not apply when
the adverse party does not appear to be a the adverse party does not appear to be a
party to the instrument or when compliance party to the instrument or when compliance
with an order for an inspection of the original with an order for an inspection of the
instrument is refused. (8a) original instrument is refused. (8a)
Section 10. Specific denial. — A defendant Section 10. Specific denial. — A defendant
must specify each material allegation of fact must specify each material allegation of fact
the truth of which he does not admit and, the truth of which he or she does not admit
whenever practicable, shall set forth the and, whenever practicable, shall set forth
substance of the matters upon which he relies the substance of the matters upon which he
to support his denial. Where a defendant or she relies to support his or her denial.
desires to deny only a part of an averment, he Where a defendant desires to deny only a
shall specify so much of it as is true and part of an averment, he or she shall specify
material and shall deny only the remainder. so much of it as is true and material and
Where a defendant is without knowledge or shall deny only the remainder. Where a
information sufficient to form a belief as to defendant is without knowledge or
the truth of a material averment made to the information sufficient to form a belief as to
complaint, he shall so state, and this shall the truth of a material averment made to the
have the effect of a denial. (10a) complaint, he or she shall so state, and this
shall have the effect of a denial. (10a)
20
The phrase “or said copy may with like effect be set forth in the pleading” was
deleted in view of the new requirement that documents must be attached to the
pleading.
Page 13 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 11. Allegations not specifically denied Section 11. Allegations not specifically denied
deemed admitted. — Material averment in the deemed admitted. — Material averments in a
complaint, other than those as to the amount pleading asserting a claim or claims, 21 other
of unliquidated damages, shall be deemed than those as to the amount of unliquidated
admitted when not specifically denied. damages, shall be deemed admitted when
Allegations of usury in a complaint to recover not specifically denied.22 (11a)
usurious interest are deemed admitted if not
denied under oath. (1a, R9)
21
The term “complaint” was replaced with the phrase “in a pleading asserting a
claim or claims” because there could also be a material averment in the answer, a third-
party complaint or cross-claim. A counter-claim can have unliquidated damages also.
22
Since there is no more usury, the Sub-Committee members also agreed to delete
the last sentence: “Allegations of usury in a complaint to recover usurious interest are
deemed admitted if not denied under oath.” Besides, the court can temper the amount
of damages, and amend the interest.
Page 14 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 12. Striking out of pleading or matter Section 13. Striking out of pleading or matter
contained therein. — Upon motion made by a contained therein. — Upon motion made by a
23
The cause of delay is that affirmative defenses are not raised in the answer, but
only in the motion to dismiss, which will be followed by a reply. There should be no
more motion to dismiss based on these grounds or defenses, which must now be
alleged in the answer. The court should be allowed to motu proprio dismiss the
complaint if the affirmative defenses are meritorious, because under the present Rules,
no judge causes motu proprio dismissal. The dismissal should now be without need of a
motion, because if an answer is filed only to find out later in the hearing of the
affirmative defense or in the pre-trial that the complaint should have been dismissed
upon receipt of the answer.
The Sub-Committee agreed to limit to the following grounds alleged in the
answer, the affirmative defenses that the court shall motu proprio resolve, namely: (1) no
jurisdiction over the person of the defending party; (2) venue is improperly laid; (3)
plaintiff has no legal capacity to sue; (4) the pleading asserting the claims states no
cause of action; and (5) condition precedent for filing the claim has not been complied
with. This is because the said grounds may be determined upon a perusal of the
material averments in the complaint or pleading asserting a claim/s and in the answer.
There will be no more preliminary hearing of the said affirmative defenses, and
the judge must motu proprio determine the same within the period provided, i.e., within
thirty (30) days from the filing of the answer, because the said grounds are obvious, like
prescription or res judicata. Under jurisprudence, hearing on affirmative defense is
discretionary; now, it should no longer be the case.
As to the other affirmative defenses stated under the proposed Section 5(b), Rule
6 — such as fraud, statute of limitations, release, payment, illegality, statute of frauds,
estoppel, former recovery, discharge in bankruptcy, and any other matter by way of
confession or avoidance — the Sub-Committee members agreed to give the court a
discretion to conduct a summary hearing within fifteen (15) days from the filing of the
answer. Such affirmative defenses shall be resolved by the court within thirty (30) days
from termination of the summary hearing. That if the affirmative defenses are denied,
such denial shall not be subject of a motion for reconsideration or petition for certiorari,
prohibition or mandamus, but may be among the matters raised on appeal after a
judgment on the merits.
Page 15 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
party before responding to a pleading or, if party before responding to a pleading or, if
no responsive pleading is permitted by these no responsive pleading is permitted by
Rules, upon motion made by a party within these Rules, upon motion made by a party
twenty (20) days after the service of the within twenty (20) calendar days after the
pleading upon him, or upon the court's own service of the pleading upon him or her, or
initiative at any time, the court may order any upon the court's own initiative at any time,
pleading to be stricken out or that any sham the court may order any pleading to be
or false, redundant, immaterial, impertinent, stricken out or that any sham or false,
or scandalous matter be stricken out redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or
therefrom. (5, R9) scandalous matter be stricken out therefrom.
(12a)
RULE 9
EFFECT OF FAILURE TO PLEAD
Section 1. Defenses and objections not pleaded. — Section 1. Defenses and objections not pleaded. —
Defenses and objections not pleaded either in Defenses and objections not pleaded either in
a motion to dismiss or in the answer are a motion to dismiss or in the answer are
deemed waived. However, when it appears deemed waived. However, when it appears
from the pleadings or the evidence on record from the pleadings or the evidence on record
that the court has no jurisdiction over the that the court has no jurisdiction over the
subject matter, that there is another action subject matter, that there is another action
pending between the same parties for the pending between the same parties for the
same cause, or that the action is barred by a same cause, or that the action is barred by a
prior judgment or by statute of limitations, prior judgment or by statute of limitations, the
the court shall dismiss the claim. (2a) court shall dismiss the claim. (1)
Section 3. Default; declaration of. — If the Section 3. Default; Declaration of. — If the
defending party fails to answer within the defending party fails to answer within the
time allowed therefor, the court shall, upon time allowed therefor, the court shall, upon
motion of the claiming party with notice to motion of the claiming party with notice to the
the defending party, and proof of such defending party, and proof of such failure,
failure, declare the defending party in default. declare the defending party in default.
Thereupon, the court shall proceed to render Thereupon, the court shall proceed to render
judgment granting the claimant such relief as judgment granting the claimant such relief as
his pleading may warrant, unless the court in his or her pleading may warrant, unless the
its discretion requires the claimant to submit court in its discretion requires the claimant to
evidence. Such reception of evidence may be submit evidence. Such reception of evidence
delegated to the clerk of court. (1a, R18) may be delegated to the clerk of court.
Page 16 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
(a) Effect of order of default. — A party in (a) Effect of order of default. — A party in
default shall be entitled to notice of default shall be entitled to notices of
subsequent proceedings but not to take part subsequent proceedings but shall not take
in the trial. (2a, R18) part in the trial.
(b) Relief from order of default. — A party (b) Relief from order of default. — A party
declared in default may at any time after declared in default may at any time after
notice thereof and before judgment file a notice thereof and before judgment, file a
motion under oath to set aside the order of motion under oath to set aside the order of
default upon proper showing that his failure default upon proper showing that his or her
to answer was due to fraud, accident, mistake failure to answer was due to fraud, accident,
or excusable negligence and that he has a mistake or excusable negligence and that he or
meritorious defense. In such case, the order of she has a meritorious defense. In such case,
default may be set aside on such terms and the order of default may be set aside on such
conditions as the judge may impose in the terms and conditions as the judge may impose
interest of justice. (3a, R18) in the interest of justice.
(c) Effect of partial default. — When a pleading (c) Effect of partial default. — When a pleading
asserting a claim states a common cause of asserting a claim states a common cause of
action against several defending parties, some action against several defending parties, some
of whom answer and the others fail to do so, of whom answer and the others fail to do so,
the court shall try the case against all upon the court shall try the case against all upon the
the answers thus filed and render judgment answers thus filed and render judgment upon
upon the evidence presented. (4a, R18). the evidence presented.
(d) Extent of relief to be awarded. — A judgment (d) Extent of relief to be awarded. — A judgment
rendered against a party in default shall not rendered against a party in default shall
exceed the amount or be different in kind neither exceed the amount or be different in
from that prayed for nor award unliquidated kind from that prayed for nor award
damages. (5a, R18). unliquidated damages.
(e) Where no defaults allowed. — If the (e) Where no defaults allowed. — If the
defending party in an action for annulment or defending party in an action for annulment or
declaration of nullity of marriage or for legal declaration of nullity of marriage or for legal
separation fails to answer, the court shall separation fails to answer, the court shall
order the prosecuting attorney to investigate order the Solicitor General or his or her
whether or not a collusion between the deputized public prosecutor,24 to investigate
parties exists, and if there is no collusion, to whether or not a collusion between the parties
intervene for the State in order to see to it that exists, and if there is no collusion, to intervene
the evidence submitted is not fabricated. (6a, for the State in order to see to it that the
R18) evidence submitted is not fabricated. (3a)
RULE 10
AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADINGS
24
As a matter of semantics and to be more precise, the term “prosecuting attorney”
should be changed and specified as “Solicitor General or his deputized public
prosecutor.”
Page 17 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
25
The phrase “confer jurisdiction on the court, or the pleading stated no cause of
action from the beginning which could be amended” was added to incorporate the
ruling in Valenzuela v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 131175, August 28, 2001) which clearly
stated that amendment of a pleading is not allowed if such amendment would
introduce a new cause of action where there is no cause of action at the outset.
Page 18 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
26
The original provision has been confusing and has caused delay in the
proceedings. No amendment should be necessary if the parties have already impliedly
or expressly agreed to litigate the issues not originally pleaded. The pleadings are
deemed amended without any formal act. Thus, the following sentences were deleted:
“Such amendment of the pleadings as necessary to cause them to conform to evidence
and to raise these issues may be made upon motion of any party at any time, even after
judgment; but failure to amend does not affect the result of the trial of these issues. If
evidence is objected to at the trial on the ground that it is not within the issues made by
the pleadings, the court may allow the pleadings to be amended and shall do so with
liberality if the presentation of the merits of the action and the ends of substantial justice
will be subserved thereby. The court may grant a continuance to enable the amendment
to be made.”
Page 19 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 7. Filing of amended pleadings. — When Section 7. Filing of amended pleadings. — When
any pleading is amended, a new copy of the any pleading is amended, a new copy of the
entire pleading, incorporating the entire pleading, incorporating the
amendments, which shall be indicated by amendments, which shall be indicated by
appropriate marks, shall be filed. (7a) appropriate marks, shall be filed. (7)
RULE 11
WHEN TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS28
Section 1. Answer to the complaint. — The Section 1. Answer to the complaint. — The
defendant shall file his answer to the defendant shall file his or her answer to the
complaint within fifteen (15) days after complaint within thirty (30) calendar days
service of summons, unless a different after service of summons, unless a different
period is fixed by the court. (la) period is fixed by the court. (1a)
27
For Regalado, once amended, the superseded pleading disappears from the
record and becomes an extrajudicial admission; thus offer is required. For Feria, in
contrast, the superseded pleading still forms part of the record and continues to be a
judicial admission; thus, no offer is needed. The Sub-Committee members agreed to
follow the view of Regalado, and changed the word “received” to “offer” to give the
party an option to offer the admission in evidence.
28
It was suggested that the reglementary periods will be discussed and taken up
later when the Sub-Committee members agree on preliminary matters regarding
statement of ultimate and evidentiary facts, and everything will be contingent upon the
period to file answer. The view of some Justices is that if pleadings will be evidentiary
in nature, and the plaintiff will be required to complete evidence, the defendant should
also be given sufficient time to file answer, like from fifteen (15) to thirty (30) days. It
was also suggested that if the evidence is not attached to the complaint, answer or
pleading, then it is deemed waived.
Page 20 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
after receipt of summons by such entity. (2a) filed within sixty (60) calendar days after
receipt of summons by such entity. (2a)
Section 5. Answer to third (fourth, etc.)-party Section 5. Answer to third (fourth, etc.)-party
complaint. — The time to answer a third complaint. — The time to answer a third
(fourth, etc.)—party complaint shall be (fourth, etc.)-party complaint shall be
governed by the same rule as the answer to governed by the same rule as the answer to
the complaint. (5a) the complaint. (5)
Page 21 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
complaint shall serve as the answer to the the court. The answer to the complaint
supplemental complaint if no new or shall serve as the answer to the
supplemental answer is filed. (n) supplemental complaint if no new or
supplemental answer is filed. (7a)
Section 10. Omitted counterclaim or cross-claim. Section 10. Omitted counterclaim or cross-
— When a pleader fails to set up a claim. — When a pleader fails to set up a
counterclaim or a cross-claim through counterclaim or a cross-claim through
oversight, inadvertence, or excusable neglect, oversight, inadvertence, or excusable
or when justice requires, he may, by leave of neglect, or when justice requires, he or she
court, set up the counterclaim or cross-claim may, by leave of court, set up the
by amendment before judgment. (3, R9) counterclaim or cross-claim by amendment
before judgment. (10a)
Section 11. Extension of time to plead. — UponSection 11. Extension of time to file an answer.
motion and on such terms as may be just, the — A defendant may, for meritorious
court may extend the time to plead provided reasons, be granted an additional period of
in these Rules. not more than thirty (30) calendar days to
file an answer. A defendant is only allowed
The court may also, upon like terms, allow to file one (1) motion for extension of time
an answer or other pleading to be filed after to file an answer.
the time fixed by these Rules. (7)
A motion for extension to file any pleading,
other than an answer, is prohibited and
considered a mere scrap of paper. The
court, however, may allow any other
pleading to be filed after the time fixed by
these Rules. 29 (11a)
29
Considering that pleadings are evidentiary in nature, it may take time for the
defendant to file an Answer because it is now required that all evidence must be
attached thereto. Hence, the necessity for an extension.
Page 22 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
RULE 12
BILL OF PARTICULARS
Section 1. When applied for; purpose. — Before Section 1. When applied for; purpose. — Before
responding to a pleading, a party may move responding to a pleading, a party may move
for a definite statement or for a bill of for a definite statement or for a bill of
particulars of any matter which is not particulars of any matter, which is not
averted with sufficient definiteness or averred with sufficient definiteness or
particularity to enable him properly to particularity, to enable him or her properly
prepare his responsive pleading. If the to prepare his or her responsive pleading. If
pleading is a reply, the motion must be filed the pleading is a reply, the motion must be
within ten (10) days from service thereof. filed within ten (10) calendar days from
Such motion shall point out the defects service thereof. Such motion shall point out
complained of, the paragraphs wherein they the defects complained of, the paragraphs
are contained, and the details desired. (1a) wherein they are contained, and the details
desired. (1a)
Section 2. Action by the court. — Upon the Section 2. Action by the court. — Upon the
filing of the motion, the clerk of court must filing of the motion, the clerk of court must
immediately bring it to the attention of the immediately bring it to the attention of the
court which may either deny or grant it court, which may either deny or grant it
outright, or allow the parties the opportunity outright, or allow the parties the opportunity
to be heard. (n) to be heard. (2)
Section 3. Compliance with order. — If the Section 3. Compliance with order. — If the
motion is granted, either in whole or in part, motion is granted, either in whole or in part,
the compliance therewith must be effected the compliance therewith must be effected
within ten (10) days from notice of the order, within ten (10) calendar days from notice of
unless a different period is fixed by the court. the order, unless a different period is fixed
The bill of particulars or a more definite by the court. The bill of particulars or a more
statement ordered by the court may be filed definite statement ordered by the court may
either in a separate or in an amended be filed either in a separate or in an amended
pleading, serving a copy thereof on the pleading, serving a copy thereof on the
adverse party. (n) adverse party. (3a)
Page 23 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 5. Stay of period to file responsive Section 5. Stay of period to file responsive
pleading. — After service of the bill of pleading. — After service of the bill of
particulars or of a more definite pleading, or particulars or of a more definite pleading, or
after notice of denial of his motion, the after notice of denial of his or her motion, the
moving party may file his responsive moving party may file his or her responsive
pleading within the period to which he was pleading within the period to which he or
entitled at the time of filing his motion, she was entitled at the time of filing his or
which shall not be less than five (5) days in her motion, which shall not be less than five
any event. (1[b]a) (5) calendar days in any event. (5a)
Section 6. Bill a part of pleading. — A bill of Section 6. Bill a part of pleading. — A bill of
particulars becomes part of the pleading for particulars becomes part of the pleading for
which it is intended. (1[a]a) which it is intended. (6)
RULE 13
FILING AND SERVICE OF PLEADINGS, JUDGMENTS AND OTHER PAPERS
Section 1. Coverage. – This Rule shall govern Section 1. Coverage. — This Rule shall govern
the filing of all pleadings and other papers, as the filing of all pleadings, motions, and other
well as the service thereof, except those for court submissions,30 as well as their service,
which a different mode of service is except those for which a different mode of
prescribed. service is prescribed. (1a)
Section 2. Filing and service, defined. – Filing is Section 2. Filing and Service, defined. — Filing is
the act of presenting the pleading or other the act of submitting the pleading or other
paper to the clerk of court. paper to the court.
Service is the act of providing a party with a Service is the act of providing a party with a
copy of the pleading or paper concerned. If copy of the pleading or any other court
any party has appeared by counsel, service submission. If a party has appeared by
upon him shall be made upon his counsel or counsel, service upon such party shall be
one of them, unless service upon the party made upon his or her counsel, unless service
himself is ordered by the court. Where one upon the party and the party’s counsel is
counsel appears for several parties, he shall ordered by the court. Where one counsel
only be entitled to one copy of any paper appears for several parties, such counsel shall
served upon him by the opposite side. only be entitled to one copy of any paper
served by the opposite side.
30
The term “other papers” is limited, and to be more accurate, because filing of
pleadings specifically deals with “motions and other court submissions” such as
manifestations and compliance.
Page 24 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 3. Manner of filing. – The filing of Section 3. Manner of filing. — The filing of
pleadings, appearances, motions, notices, pleadings and other court submissions32 shall
orders, judgments and all other papers shall be made by:
be made by presenting the original copies
thereof, plainly indicated as such, personally (a) Submitting personally the original
to the clerk of court or by sending them by thereof, plainly indicated as such, to the
registered mail. In the first case, the clerk of court;
court shall endorse on the pleading the date
and hour of filing. In the second case, the date (b) Sending them by registered mail;
of the mailing of motions, pleadings, or any
other papers or payments or deposits, as (c) Sending them by accredited courier; 33
shown by the post office stamp on the or
envelope or the registry receipt, shall be
considered as the date of their filing, (d) Transmitting them by electronic mail or
payment, or deposit in court. The envelope other electronic means as may be
shall be attached to the record of the case. authorized by the Court in places
where the court is electronically
equipped.
Section 4. Papers required to be filed and served. – Section 4. Papers required to be filed and served. –
Every judgment, resolution, order, pleading Every judgment, resolution, order, pleading
subsequent to the complaint, written motion, subsequent to the complaint, written motion,
31
The amendment clarifies instances where a party has more than one counsel
appearing for one party in order to avoid burden upon the courts.
32
The phrase “appearances, motions, notices, orders, judgments” was deleted, and
simplified as “other court submissions.”
33
Couriers shall be accredited like surety and bonding companies by the OCA,
pursuant to its guidelines which will be approved by the Court en banc
34
The date of mailing through the OCA-accredited courier is also the date of filing, but
proof of payment of filing or docket fees should also be included in the mail.
Page 25 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
35
The reason for the proposed amendment is because some parties evade service,
which causes delay, and that the requirement is for court submissions, i.e., service to the
other party.
Page 26 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
36
This provision was taken or lifted from the Quezon City Practice Guidelines, and
the provision is only about presumptive notice of court setting, when such notice has
been mailed.
Page 27 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 9. Service of judgments, final orders or Section 13. Service of Judgments, Final Orders or
resolutions. – Judgments, final orders or Resolutions. — Judgments, final orders, or
resolutions shall be served either personally resolutions shall be served either personally
or by registered mail. When a party or by registered mail. Upon ex parte motion of
summoned by publication has failed to any party in the case, a copy of the judgment,
appear in the action, judgments, final orders final order, or resolution may be delivered by
or resolutions against him shall be served accredited courier at the expense of such
upon him also by publication at the expense party.39 When a party summoned by
of the prevailing party. publication has failed to appear in the action,
judgments, final orders or resolutions against
him or her shall be served upon him or her
also by means of publication at the expense of
the prevailing party. (9a)
37
The proposed amendment provides guidelines to notify the court of the change
of the parties’ email addresses or facsimile numbers. If mailed to their old address,
service would still be deemed valid. Service through electronic mail address or facsimile
number of record of a party shall be presumed valid unless such party notifies the court
of any change, as aforementioned. If the court is not informed and given notice of the
change of address, then the notice sent to the old address is deemed served.
38
This is for the convenience of the court as to the parameters/format, for easier
collation once the file is downloaded in the computer. The provision prescribed the
format of the subject field of the email or facsimile transmission, and the filename of the
pleadings attached to such email or facsimile.
39
The purpose of the proposed amendment is that courts sometimes have difficulty
in serving judgments, final orders and resolutions; thus, accredited private courier
should be allowed to serve these matters to avoid delay. The reckoning period for
determining the date of filing is provided under the provisions on completeness of
service
Page 28 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 10. Completeness of service. – Personal Section 15. Completeness of service. — Personal
service is complete upon actual delivery. service is complete upon actual delivery.
Service by ordinary mail is complete upon the Service by ordinary mail is complete upon the
expiration of ten (10) days after mailing, expiration of ten (10) calendar days after
unless the court otherwise provides. Service mailing, unless the court otherwise provides.
by registered mail is complete upon actual Service by registered mail is complete upon
receipt by the addressee, or after five (5) days actual receipt by the addressee, or after five
from the date he received the first notice of (5) calendar days from the date he or she
the postmaster, whichever date is earlier. received the first notice of the postmaster,
whichever date is earlier. Service by
accredited courier is complete upon actual
receipt by the addressee, or after at least two
(2) attempts to deliver by the courier service,
or upon the expiration of five (5) calendar
days after the first attempt to deliver,
whichever is earlier.
Section 12. Proof of filing. – The filing of a Section 16. Proof of filing.40 — The filing of a
pleading or paper shall be proved by its pleading or any other court submission shall
existence in the record of the case. If it is not be proved by its existence in the record of the
in the record, but is claimed to have been filed case.
personally, the filing shall be proved by the
written or stamped acknowledgment of its (a) If the pleading or any other court
filing by the clerk of court on a copy of the submission is not in the record, but is
same; if filed by registered mail, by the claimed to have been filed personally,
registry receipt and by the affidavit of the the filing shall be proven by the written
person who did the mailing, containing a full or stamped acknowledgment of its
statement of the date and place of depositing filing by the clerk of court on a copy of
the mail in the post office in a sealed envelope the pleading or court submission;
addressed to the court, with postage fully
prepaid, and with instructions to the (b) If the pleading or any other court
postmaster to return the mail to the sender submission was filed by registered
after ten (10) days if not delivered. mail, the filing shall be proven by the
registry receipt and by the affidavit of
the person who mailed it, containing a
full statement of the date and place of
deposit of the mail in the post office in
a sealed envelope addressed to the
court, with postage fully prepaid, and
with instructions to the postmaster to
return the mail to the sender after ten
(10) calendar days if not delivered.
40
The original Section 12 on proof of filing was merely reformatted for easy
reading, and provisions were added with respect to filing by accredited courier service
and by electronic mail only, but not through facsimile transmission, which is not
allowed for court submissions. The phrase “pleading or any other court submission”
was just added in lieu of the word “paper.”
41
The proposed amendment deals with proof of filing for accredited courier
service and proof of filing for emails.
Page 30 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 13. Proof of service. – Proof of personal Section 17. Proof of service. –— Proof of
service shall consist of a written admission of personal service shall consist of a written
the party served, or the official return of the admission of the party served, or the official
server, or the affidavit of the party serving, return of the server, or the affidavit of the
containing a full statement of the date, place party serving, containing a statement of the
and manner of service. If the service is by date, place, and manner of service. If the
ordinary mail, proof thereof shall consist of service is made by:
an affidavit of the person mailing of facts
showing compliance with section 7 of this (a) Ordinary mail. – Proof shall consist of an
Rule. If service is made by registered mail, affidavit of the person mailing stating the
proof shall be made by such affidavit and the facts showing compliance with Section 7
registry receipt issued by the mailing office. of this Rule.
The registry return card shall be filed
immediately upon its receipt by the sender, or (b) Registered mail. – Proof shall be made by
in lieu thereof the unclaimed letter together the affidavit mentioned above and the
with the certified or sworn copy of the notice registry receipt issued by the mailing
given by the postmaster to the addressee. office. The registry return card shall be
filed immediately upon its receipt by the
sender, or in lieu thereof, the unclaimed
letter together with the certified or sworn
copy of the notice given by the
postmaster to the addressee.
Section 14. Notice of lis pendens. – In an action Section 19. Notice of lis pendens.43— In an action
affecting the title or the right of possession of affecting the title or the right of possession of
real property, the plaintiff and the defendant, real property, the plaintiff and the defendant,
when affirmative relief is claimed in his when affirmative relief is claimed in his or her
answer, may record in the office of the answer, may record in the office of the
registry of deeds of the province in which the registry of deeds of the province in which the
property is situated a notice of the pendency property is situated a notice of the pendency
of the action. Said notice shall contain the of the action. Said notice shall contain the
names of the parties and the object of the names of the parties and the object of the
action or defense, and a description of the action or defense, and a description of the
property in that province affected thereby. property in that province affected thereby.
Only from the time of filing such notice for Only from the time of filing such notice for
record shall a purchaser, or encumbrancer of record shall a purchaser, or encumbrancer of
the property affected thereby, be deemed to the property affected thereby, be deemed to
have constructive notice of the pendency of have constructive notice of the pendency of
the action, and only of its pendency against the action, and only of its pendency against
the parties designated by their real names. the parties designated by their real names.
The notice of lis pendens hereinabove The notice of lis pendens hereinabove
mentioned may be cancelled only upon order mentioned may be cancelled only upon order
of the court, after proper showing that the of the court, after proper showing that the
notice is for the purpose of molesting the notice is for the purpose of molesting the
adverse party, or that it is not necessary to adverse party, or that it is not necessary to
protect the rights of the party who caused it protect the rights of the party who caused it to
42
The proposed amendment reworded and reformatted for easy reading, and
inserted provisions on proof of service whenever accredited couriers and electronic mail
or facsimile transmission are resorted to.
43
Misplaced provision but there is no other Rule where it can be transposed.
Page 32 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
RULE 14
SUMMONS
Section 1. Clerk to issue summons – Upon the Section 1. Clerk to issue summons. — Unless
filing of the complaint and the payment of the the complaint is on its face dismissible
requisite legal fees, the clerk of court shall under Section 1, Rule 9, the court shall,
forthwith issue the corresponding summons within five (5) calendar days from receipt
to the defendants. of the initiatory pleading and proof of
payment of the requisite legal fees, direct
the clerk of court to issue the
corresponding summons to the
defendants. (1a)
44
Section 2. Contents – The summons shall be Section 2. Contents. — The summons shall
directed to the defendant, signed by the clerk be directed to the defendant, signed by the
of court under seal, and contain: (a) the name clerk of court under seal, and contain:
of the court and the names of the parties to
the action; (b) a direction that the defendant (a) The name of the court and the names
answer within the time fixed by these Rules; of the parties to the action;
(c) a notice that unless the defendant so
answers, plaintiff will take judgment by (b) When authorized by the court upon
default and may be granted the relief applied ex parte motion, an authorization for
for. the plaintiff to serve summons to the
defendant; 45
A copy of the complaint and order for
appointment of guardian ad litem, if any, shall (c) A direction that the defendant answer
be attached to the original and each copy of within the time fixed by these Rules;
the summons. and
44
A party can expect action by the court within five (5) [calendar] days, unlike the
usual practice for a clerk of court to wait for instruction from the judge. They added that
the determination of whether an initiatory pleading is sufficient in form and substance,
is a judicial function.
45
This is based on the practice of some judges to instruct the lawyers to accompany
the sheriff to ensure service of summons.
Page 33 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
46
To address the situation where the trial court has to serve summons in far flung
provinces, which requires considerable funds and time to undertake. She added that
service of summons in coordination with the sheriff of courts in distant areas is difficult.
With the proposed amendment, the plaintiff may now be authorized to serve summons
even without the sheriff.
47
In practice, the lawyer accompanies the sheriff if the case is sensitive. To prevent
false claims of proper service of summons, the provision states that if the summons is
served by the plaintiff, but it was shown later that there was no service upon the
defendant, the case can be dismissed with prejudice, like in small claims cases.
Page 34 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 4. Return. – When the service has been Amended counterpart provision
completed, the server shall, within five (5) transposed as Section 20 below.
days therefrom, serve a copy of the return,
personally or by registered mail, to the
plaintiff’s counsel, and shall return the
summons to the clerk who issued it,
accompanied by proof of service.
48
The dismissal is for failure to prosecute under Section 3, Rule 17. The proposed
amendment seeks to address the main concern of archived cases lingering in the docket
of the courts, and to give the judge the authority to dismiss such cases for failure to
prosecute. The dismissal should be without prejudice to give the plaintiff the chance to
re-file the case once the defendant is found and can be summoned already.
49
The deleted provision reads: “If a summons is returned without being served on
any or all of the defendants, the server shall also serve a copy of the return on the
plaintiff’s counsel, stating the reasons for the failure of service, within five (5) days
therefrom. In such a case, or if the summons has been lost, the clerk on demand of the
plaintiff, may issue an alias summons.” The provision does not happen in courts, and
that the deletion will simplify the provision. Summons should remain valid unless
recalled, lost or destroyed; and it is only then that alias summons may be issued.
50
The proposed last paragraph describes when substituted service of summons
could be made, i.e., after unsuccessful attempts to personally serve summons on the
defendant.
Page 35 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 7. Substituted service. — If, for Section 6. Substituted service. — If, for
justifiable causes, the defendant cannot be justifiable causes, the defendant cannot be
served within a reasonable time as provided served personally after at least three (3)
in the preceding section, service may be attempts on two (2) different dates, 52
effected (a) by leaving copies of the summons service may be effected:
at the defendant's residence with some person
of suitable age and discretion then residing (a) By leaving copies of the summons at
therein, or (b) by leaving the copies at the defendant's residence to a person
defendant's office or regular place of business at least eighteen (18) years of age and
with some competent person in charge of sufficient discretion residing
thereof. (8a) therein;
51
The proposed amendment is based on the sheriff’s handbook, and specifies the
act of tendering, i.e., leaving the summons within the view and in the presence of the
defendant. There must be an overt act informing that summons is being served.
52
The proposed amendment specifies the number of attempts of personal service (3
attempts on 2 different dates) and to whom substituted service of summons should be
made, pursuant to Manotoc vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 130974, August 16, 2006.
53
The usual problem with respect to service of summons to residents of gated
villages and condominiums. To address this issue, it was suggested that responsible
officers of the village association and condominium association can be served
summons. In cases of gated villages, the security staff will not allow the person serving
summons to enter the village, and will just say that upon calling the resident, there was
an instruction not to allow entry of the one serving summons.
Page 36 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 8. Service upon entity without juridical Section 7. Service upon entity without
personality. – When persons associated in an juridical personality. — When persons
entity without juridical personality are sued associated in an entity without juridical
under the name by which they are generally personality are sued under the name by
or commonly known, service may be effected which they are generally or commonly
upon all the defendants by serving upon any known, service may be effected upon all
one of them, or upon the person in charge of the defendants by serving upon any one
the office or place of business maintained in of them, or upon the person in charge of
such name. But such service shall not bind the office or place of business maintained
individually any person whose connection in such name. But such service shall not
with the entity has, upon due notice, been bind individually any person whose
severed before the action was brought. connection with the entity has, upon due
notice, been severed before the action was
filed. (8a)
Section 9. Service upon prisoners.- When the Section 8. Service upon prisoners. — When
defendant is a prisoner confined in a jail or the defendant is a prisoner confined in a
institution, service shall be effected upon him jail or institution, service shall be effected
by the officer having the management of such upon him or her by the officer having the
jail or institution who is deemed deputized as management of such jail or institution
a special sheriff for said purpose. who is deemed as a special sheriff for said
purpose. The jail warden shall file a
return within five (5) calendar days from
service of summons to the defendant. 54
(9a)
Section 10. Service upon minors and Section 10. Service upon minors and
incompetents. – When the defendant is a incompetents. — When the defendant is a
minor, insane or otherwise an incompetent, minor, insane or otherwise an
service shall be made upon him personally incompetent person, service of summons
and on his legal guardian if he has one, or if shall be made upon him or her personally
none, upon his guardian ad litem whose and on his or her legal guardian if he or
appointment shall be applied for the plaintiff. she has one, or if none, upon his or her
54
A period to file a return was added to ensure prompt service.
55
Pertains to the Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial
Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, more commonly known as the Hague
Service Convention.
Page 37 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
In the case of a minor, service may also be guardian ad litem whose appointment
made on his father or mother. shall be applied for by the plaintiff. In the
case of a minor, service shall56 be made on
his or her parent or guardian. (10a)
Section 11. Service upon domestic private Section 12. Service upon domestic private
juridical entity. – When the defendant is a juridical entity. — When the defendant is a
corporation, partnership or association corporation, partnership or association
organized under the laws of the Philippines organized under the laws of the
with a juridical personality, service may be Philippines with a juridical personality,
made on the president, managing partner, service may be made on the president,
general manager, corporate secretary, managing partner, general manager,
treasurer, or in-house counsel. corporate secretary, treasurer, or in-house
counsel of the corporation wherever they
may be found, or in their absence or
unavailability, on their secretaries.
56
The phrase “may also” was replaced with “shall” to make it mandatory, not
optional, because the defendant is a minor or incompetent.
57
This is a new provision which states a definite rule that spouses should be served
with summons separately, because only one of the spouses is usually served summons.
On how to serve summons when one of the spouses is in hiding or the spouses are
separated in fact, it was suggested that substituted service can be made because the
spouses are sued jointly. There might be a delay if service of summons is individually,
and not alternatively. There are cases when one of the spouses is sued for sum of
money, and there is showing that proceeds thereof redounded to the benefit of the
family; hence, the need to serve summons on both spouses to give them opportunity to
answer.
58
The proposed amendment also added is a provision for corporations under
receivership or in liquidation.
Page 38 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 12. Service upon foreign private juridical Section 14. Service upon foreign private
entity.- When the defendant is a foreign juridical entities. — When the defendant is a
private juridical entity which has transacted foreign private juridical entity which has
business in the Philippines, service may be transacted or is doing business in the
made on its resident agent designated in Philippines, as defined by law,61 service
accordance with law for that purpose, or if may be made on its resident agent
there be no such agent, on the government designated in accordance with law for that
official designated by law to that effect, or on purpose, or, if there be no such agent, on
any of its officers or agents within the the government official designated by law
Philippines. to that effect, or on any of its officers,
agents, directors or trustees within the
If the foreign private juridical entity is not Philippines.
registered in the Philippines or has no
resident agent, service may, with leave of If the foreign private juridical entity is not
court, be effected out of the Philippines registered in the Philippines, or has no
through any of the following means: resident agent but has transacted or is
doing business in it, as defined by law,
a) By personal service coursed through such service may, with leave of court, be
the appropriate court in the foreign effected outside of the Philippines through
country with the assistance of the any of the following means:
Department of Foreign Affairs;
(a) By personal service coursed through
b) By publication once in a newspaper of the appropriate court in the foreign
59
The proposed amendment added individuals upon whom alternate service may
be made for facility and to put an end to unscrupulous practices in evading service of
summons.
60
The reason for the proposed amendment is to avoid delay in litigating civil cases,
whereby a counsel would enter special appearance on behalf of the defendant client to
question the jurisdiction on the ground of invalid service of summons, but would refuse
to divulge the address of the client.
61
“Doing business” has a specific definition, but includes cases of isolated
transactions.
Page 39 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 13. Service upon public corporations. — Section 15. Service upon public corporations.
When the defendant is the Republic of the — When the defendant is the Republic of
Philippines, service may be effected on the the Philippines, service may be effected on
Solicitor General; in case of a province, city or the Solicitor General; in case of a province,
municipality, or like public corporations, city or municipality, or like public
service may be effected on its executive head, corporations, service may be effected on its
or on such other officer or officers as the law executive head, or on such other officer or
or the court may direct. (15) officers as the law or the court may direct.
(13a)
Section 14. Service upon defendant whose Section 16. Service upon defendant whose
identity or whereabouts are unknown. — In any identity or whereabouts are unknown. — In
action where the defendant is designated as any action where the defendant is
an unknown owner, or the like, or whenever designated as an unknown owner, or the
his whereabouts are unknown and cannot be like, or whenever his or her whereabouts
ascertained by diligent inquiry, service may, are unknown and cannot be ascertained
by leave of court, be effected upon him by by diligent inquiry, within ninety (90)
publication in a newspaper of general calendar days from the commencement of
circulation and in such places and for such the action, service may, by leave of court,
time as the court may order. (16a) be effected upon him or her by
publication in a newspaper of general
circulation and in such places and for
such time as the court may order.
62
The proposed amendment merely provided a period of 90 days within which the
Page 40 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
(14a)
Section 15. Extraterritorial service. - When the Section 17. Extraterritorial service. — When
defendant does not reside and is not found in the defendant does not reside and is not
the Philippines, and the action affects the found in the Philippines, and the action
personal status of the plaintiff or relates to, or affects the personal status of the plaintiff or
the subject of which is, property within the relates to, or the subject of which is,
Philippines, in which the defendant has or property within the Philippines, in which
claims a lien or interest, actual or contingent, the defendant has or claims a lien or
or in which the relief demanded consists, interest, actual or contingent, or in which
wholly or in part, in excluding the defendant the relief demanded consists, wholly or in
from any interest therein, or the property of part, in excluding the defendant from any
the defendant has been attached within the interest therein, or the property of the
Philippines, service may, by leave of court, be defendant has been attached within the
effected out of the Philippines by personal Philippines, service may, by leave of court,
service as under section 6; or by publication in be effected out of the Philippines by
a newspaper of general circulation in such personal service as under Section 5; or as
places and for such time as the court may provided for in international conventions
order, in which case a copy of the summons to which the Philippines is a party; 63 or by
and order of the court shall be sent by publication in a newspaper of general
registered mail to the last known address of circulation in such places and for such time
the defendant, or in any other manner the as the court may order, in which case a
court may deem sufficient. Any order copy of the summons and order of the
granting such leave shall specify a reasonable court shall be sent by registered mail to the
time, which shall not be less than sixty (60) last known address of the defendant, or in
days after notice, within which the defendant any other manner the court may deem
must answer. (17a) sufficient. Any order granting such leave
shall specify a reasonable time, which shall
not be less than sixty (60) calendar days
after notice, within which the defendant
must answer. (15a)
Section 16. Residents temporarily out of the Section 18. Residents temporarily out of the
Philippines. — When any action is commenced Philippines. — When any action is
against a defendant who ordinarily resides commenced against a defendant who
within the Philippines, but who is ordinarily resides within the Philippines,
temporarily out of it, service may, by leave of but who is temporarily out of it, service
court, be also effected out of the Philippines, may, by leave of court, be also effected out
plaintiff should cause, with leave of court, the service of summons by publication upon
a defendant whose identity or whereabouts are unknown. The other proposed
amendment fixed the reasonable time of not less than 60 days after notice within which
to file answer. The said periods were fixed to prevent needless delay.
63
This is consistent with jurisprudence that the said mode of service could be
coursed through the DFA and consular offices, and for purposes of class discussion in
order to specify the generic phrase on what such mode of service may be deemed
sufficient. As to the addition of the phrase “or in accordance with applicable international
agreements or conventions to which the Philippines is a signatory or a state party,” the same is
in anticipation of the effectivity of the Service Convention.
Page 41 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
as under the preceding section. (18a) of the Philippines, as under the preceding
Section. (16a)
Section 17. Leave of court. — Any application Section 19. Leave of court. — Any
to the court under this Rule for leave to effect application to the court under this Rule for
service in any manner for which leave of leave to effect service in any manner for
court is necessary shall be made by motion in which leave of court is necessary shall be
writing, supported by affidavit of the plaintiff made by motion in writing, supported by
or some person on his behalf, setting forth the affidavit of the plaintiff or some person on
grounds for the application. (19) his behalf, setting forth the grounds for the
application. (17a)
64
The proposed amendment includes the 30-day period within which to complete
the service, in order to ensure that the action moves, and clearly lays out what must be
stated in the return so parties and court personnel may be guided accordingly. 30 days
is reasonable because courts usually have to serve a lot of summons and other court
processes, especially those involving multiple defendants.
As to the last two paragraphs on the contents of the return of summons, they
embody the requirements in the Manotoc case on service of summons.
Page 42 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 18. Proof of service. — The proof of Section 21. Proof of service. — The proof of
service of a summons shall be made in service of a summons shall be made in
writing by the server and shall set forth the writing by the server and shall set forth
manner, place, and date of service; shall the manner, place, and date of service;
specify any papers which have been served shall specify any papers which have been
with the process and the name of the person served with the process and the name of
who received the same; and shall be sworn to the person who received the same; and
when made by a person other than a sheriff or shall be sworn to when made by a person
his deputy. other than a sheriff or his or her deputy.
Section 19. Proof of service by publication. — If Section 22. Proof of service by publication. —
the service has been made by publication, If the service has been made by
service may be proved by the affidavit of the publication, service may be proved by the
printer, his foreman or principal clerk, or of affidavit of the publisher,66 editor,
the editor, business or advertising manager, business or advertising manager, to
to which affidavit a copy of the publication which affidavit a copy of the publication
shall be attached, and by an affidavit showing shall be attached and by an affidavit
the deposit of a copy of the summons and showing the deposit of a copy of the
order for publication in the post office, summons and order for publication in the
postage prepaid, directed to the defendant by post office, postage prepaid, directed to
registered mail to his last known address. the defendant by registered mail to his or
her last known address. (19a)
65
The proposed amendment includes proof of service in case summons is served
by electronic mail, i.e., email print out, copy of summons served and affidavit of service.
66
The proposed amendment merely deleted the terms “printer” and “his foreman or
principal clerk” which used to be the individuals required to execute an affidavit of
service as proof of service by publication.
Page 43 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 20. Voluntary Appearance. - The Section 23. Voluntary appearance. — The
defendant's voluntary appearance in the defendant's voluntary appearance in the
action shall be equivalent to service of action shall be equivalent to service of
summons. The inclusion in a motion to summons. The inclusion in a motion to
dismiss of other grounds aside from lack of dismiss of other grounds aside from lack
jurisdiction over the person of the defendant of jurisdiction over the person of the
shall not be deemed a voluntary appearance. defendant shall be deemed67 a voluntary
(23a) appearance. (20a)
RULE 15
MOTIONS
Section 2. Motions must be in writing. – All Section 2. Motions must be in writing. — All
motions shall be in writing except those motions shall be in writing except those
made in open court or in the course of a made in open court or in the course of a
hearing or trial. hearing or trial.
67
As to the deletion of the word “not”, it was pointed out that other reliefs from the
court should not be sought if the defendant is questioning lack of jurisdiction over the
person. The proposed deletion could have an effect on the Omnibus Motion rule. There
may be resistance to the proposed deletion because of conflicting jurisprudence, i.e.,
between liberal and strict construction of the provision on special appearance to
question jurisdiction over the person, which could be construed as waiver or non-
waiver of other grounds. The Sub-Committee agreed that the inclusion in the motion to
dismiss of other grounds aside from lack of jurisdiction over the person of the
defendant shall be deemed a voluntary appearance.
68
The proposed amendment deals with motions in open court or during hearing,
which should be immediately resolved in open court. As to why oral motions “should be
immediately resolved in open court,” it was said that the provision should be mandatory in
order to avoid delay, and that the judge will be taught later on what to do in case
additional evidence is required to be presented. As to what should be done if there are
motions that require further submission from the parties, it was stated that the judge
can reset the hearing; for instance, in case of a conditional examination of a witness, the
judge can allow the presentation of the witness during the next hearing. It was also
observed that in cases of motion for reconsideration, the judge will set it for hearing and
direct the adverse party to file a comment/opposition within so many days. It was
Page 44 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 3. Contents. – A motion shall state the Section 3. Contents. – A motion shall state the
relief sought to be obtained and the grounds relief sought to be obtained and the grounds
upon which it is based, and if required by upon which it is based, and if required by
these Rules or necessary to prove facts these Rules or necessary to prove facts
alleged therein, shall be accompanied by alleged therein, shall be accompanied by
supporting affidavits and other papers. supporting affidavits and other papers. (3)
noted that the judge should already let the parties argue on the motion and make a
ruling thereon to avoid delay.
69
Copied verbatim from Section 8, Rule 133 of the Revised Rules on Evidence, as
amended by A.M. No. 19-08-15-SC dated October 8, 2019.
70
This entire provision was proposed to be deleted. Only litigious motions, as
enumerated below, will be heard, subject to the discretion of the judge who shall issue a
notice of hearing. Such motions shall be resolved within 15 calendar days from receipt
of the opposition thereto. Likewise enumerated below are non-litigious motions and
prohibited motions, which shall not be heard.
71
The proposed new provision enumerates the non-litigious motions which, shall
not be heard, but must be resolved within 7 calendar days.
There is no dispute that a motion for the issuance of an alias summons, a motion
for the issuance of a writ or an alias writ of execution, a motion for extension to file
answer and a motion to issue a writ of possession are non-litigious. The word
“meritorious” before “motion for postponement” was deleted because it will be the judge
who will determine whether there is merit to such motion. The phrase “motion to set the
Page 45 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
case for pre-trial” was also deleted because under the Pre-trial Guidelines [A.M. No. 03-1-
09-SC dated August 16, 2004], the duty to set the case for pre-trial no longer lies upon
the plaintiff, but on the Branch Clerk of Court (BCC), who shall be required to schedule
the same within 5 days from receipt of the last responsive pleading. If the BCC fails to
set the case for pre-trial, the plaintiff may still file the appropriate motion, otherwise,
the case may be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Based on experience, the case will
not proceed if the plaintiff does not set the case for pre-trial. Just like under special
rules, the BCC should be the one to set the case for pre-trial. It was recalled that the
motion to set the case for pre-trial was allowed before, just in case the court fails to do
so. It was noted that if the BCC fails to set the case for pre-trial, the plaintiff may still file
a motion to remind the court; otherwise, the defendant may file a motion to dismiss the
case for failure to prosecute.
The “motion to amend” was likewise dropped, because before the filing of a
responsive pleading, only a notice is required inasmuch as amendment is a matter of
right; whereas after the filing of a responsive pleading, amendment should be with
leave of court, hence, the motion to amend is a litigious one. Anent the phrase “ other
similar motions,” it is a catch-all provision.
72
The proposed amendment is a new provision that deals with litigious motions,
which must be resolved after receipt of the opposition only, or subject to the discretion
of the court, after hearing of the enumerated motions. There is no dispute that the
following are litigious motions: motion to dismiss, motion for new trial, motion for
reconsideration and motion for execution pending appeal, motion to cancel statutory
lien, motion for an order to break in or for a writ of demolition, motion for intervention,
motion for judgment on the pleadings, motion for summary judgment, demurrer to
Page 46 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
motions include:
Page 47 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 7. Motion day. – Except for motions Section 8. Motion day. — Except for motions
requiring immediate action, all motions shall requiring immediate action, where the court
be scheduled for hearing on Friday75 decides to conduct hearing on a litigious
afternoons, or if Friday is a non-working motion, the same shall be set on a Friday.
day, in the afternoon of the next working (7a)
day.
Section 8. Omnibus motion. – Subject to the Section 9. Omnibus motion. — Subject to the
provisions of section 1 of Rule 9, a motion provisions of Section 1 of Rule 9, a motion
attacking a pleading, order, judgment, or attacking a pleading, order, judgment, or
73
The proposed new provision stresses that only litigious motions will be heard,
depending on the discretion of the judge. The movants are no longer required to set
their motions for hearing, and the judge will issue the necessary notice when hearing is
needed to resolve pending litigious motions. Hearing of motions, especially non-
litigious ones, causes delay.
74
The proposed amendment in boldface makes specific reference to a relevant
provision, and deletes the phrase “set for hearing” because it is discretionary upon the
court to hear litigious motions, and it will be the one to set the hearing.
75
The reason why Friday was set as motion day is because Chief Justice Andres
Narvasa wanted judges from far-flung areas to avoid being absent on Fridays. Besides,
Friday is also the motion day for criminal cases. The last sentence of the proposed
amendment was deleted to make sure that when the court decides to summarily hear a
litigious motion, hearing shall be set on a Friday. It was stressed that hearing of litigious
motions is discretionary.
Page 48 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
proceeding shall include all objections then proceeding shall include all objections then
available, and all objections not so included available, and all objections not so included
shall be deemed waived. shall be deemed waived. (8a)
Section 9. Motion for leave. – A motion for Section 10. Motion for leave. — A motion for
leave to file a pleading or motion shall be leave to file a pleading or motion shall be
accompanied by the pleading or motion accompanied by the pleading or motion
sought to be admitted. sought to be admitted. (9)
Section 10. Form. – The Rules applicable to Section 11. Form. — The Rules applicable to
pleadings shall apply to written motions so pleadings shall apply to written motions so
far as concerns caption, designation, far as concerns caption, designation,
signature, and other matters of form. signature, and other matters of form. (10)
76
The Sub-Committee agreed that the following motions should be prohibited as
they cause delay: motion to dismiss except on grounds of lack of jurisdiction over the
subject matter, litis pendentia, res judicata, prescription and statute of frauds; motion to
hear affirmative defenses (which must be included in the answer, otherwise, it is
deemed waived); motion for reconsideration of the court’s action on the affirmative
defenses; motion for bill of particulars (which may be dispensed with at the discretion
of the Court En Banc, since pleadings are now evidentiary in nature); motion to
suspend proceedings without a temporary restraining order or injunction issued by a
higher court; motion for extension to file pleadings, affidavits or any other papers,
except to file answer, provided that the defendant submits valid reasons; and motion
for postponement.
The motion for extension to file answer may be extended for another 30 calendar
days only, considering that pleadings should now include evidence, and it may take
time for the defendant to prepare a responsive pleading. The provisions on motion for
postponement were taken from the Quezon City Practice Guidelines and the Revised
Guidelines for Continuous Trial of Criminal Cases.
Page 49 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
RULE 16
MOTION TO DISMISS
RULE 17
DISMISSAL OF ACTIONS
Section 1. Dismissal upon notice by plaintiff.— Section 1. Dismissal upon notice by plaintiff.
A complaint may be dismissed by the — A complaint may be dismissed by the
plaintiff by filing a notice of dismissal at any plaintiff by filing a notice of dismissal at
time before service of the answer or of a any time before service of the answer or of
motion for summary judgment. Upon such a motion for summary judgment. Upon
notice being filed, the court shall issue an such notice being filed, the court shall issue
order confirming the dismissal. Unless an order confirming the dismissal. Unless
otherwise stated in the notice, the dismissal otherwise stated in the notice, the dismissal
is without prejudice, except that a notice is without prejudice, except that a notice
operates as an adjudication upon the merits operates as an adjudication upon the merits
when filed by a plaintiff who has once when filed by a plaintiff who has once
dismissed in a competent court an action dismissed in a competent court an action
based on or including the same claim. (1a) based on or including the same claim. (1)
Section 2. Dismissal upon motion of plaintiff.— Section 2. Dismissal upon motion of plaintiff.
Except as provided in the preceding section, a — Except as provided in the preceding
complaint shall not be dismissed at the section, a complaint shall not be dismissed
plaintiff’s instance save upon approval of the at the plaintiff's instance save upon
court and upon such terms and conditions as approval of the court and upon such terms
the court deems proper. If a counterclaim has and conditions as the court deems proper.
been pleaded by a defendant prior to the If a counterclaim has been pleaded by a
service upon him of the plaintiff’s motion for defendant prior to the service upon him or
dismissal, the dismissal shall be limited to her of the plaintiff's motion for dismissal,
the complaint. The dismissal shall be without the dismissal shall be limited to the
prejudice to the right of the defendant to complaint. The dismissal shall be without
prosecute his counterclaim in a separate prejudice to the right of the defendant to
action unless within fifteen (15) days from prosecute his or her counterclaim in a
notice of the motion he manifests his separate action unless within fifteen (15)
preference to have his counterclaim resolved calendar days from notice of the motion he
in the same action. Unless otherwise or she manifests his or her preference to
specified in the order, a dismissal under this have his or her counterclaim resolved in
paragraph shall be without prejudice. A class the same action. Unless otherwise specified
suit shall not be dismissed or compromised in the order, a dismissal under this
without the approval of the court. (2a) paragraph shall be without prejudice. A
class suit shall not be dismissed or
Page 51 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 3. Dismissal due to fault of plaintiff.—If, Section 3. Dismissal due to fault of plaintiff.
for no justifiable cause, the plaintiff fails to — If, for no justifiable cause, the plaintiff
appear on the date of the presentation of his fails to appear on the date of the
evidence in chief on the complaint, or to presentation of his or her evidence in chief
prosecute his action for an unreasonable on the complaint, or to prosecute his or her
length of time, or to comply with these Rules action for an unreasonable length of time,
or any order of the court, the complaint may or to comply with these Rules or any
be dismissed upon motion of the defendant order of the court, the complaint may be
or upon the court’s own motion, without dismissed upon motion of the defendant or
prejudice to the right of the defendant to upon the court's own motion, without
prosecute his counterclaim in the same or in prejudice to the right of the defendant to
a separate action. This dismissal shall have prosecute his or her counterclaim in the
the effect of an adjudication upon the merits, same or in a separate action. This dismissal
unless otherwise declared by the court. (3a) shall have the effect of an adjudication
upon the merits, unless otherwise declared
by the court. (3a)
RULE 18
PRE-TRIAL
Page 52 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 1. When conducted. - After the last Section 1. When conducted. — After the last
pleading has been served and filed, it shall responsive pleading has been served and
be the duty of the plaintiff to promptly move filed, the branch clerk of court shall issue,
ex parte that the case be set for pre-trial. within five (5) calendar days from filing, a
notice of pre-trial which shall be set not
later than sixty (60) calendar days from the
filing of the last responsive pleading.77 (1a)
Section 2. Nature and purpose. - The pre-trial Section 2. Nature and Purpose. — The pre-
is mandatory. The court shall consider: trial is mandatory and should be
terminated promptly. The court shall
(a) The possibility of an amicable settlement consider:
or of a submission to alternative modes of
dispute resolution; (a) The possibility of an amicable
settlement or of a submission to
(b) The simplification of the issues; alternative modes of dispute resolution;
77
In the case of LBL Industries, Inc v. City of Lapu-Lapu (G.R. No. 201760, September
16, 2013), which reconciled Section 1, Rule 18 and the Pre-trial Guidelines, it is still the
duty of the lawyer to a motion to set the case for pre-trial, otherwise, the BCC should set
the case for pre-trial. If the plaintiff’s lawyer fails to do so, the case may be dismissed for
failure to prosecute.
It was noted that if the notice should come from the court, the BCC may forget to
set the case for pre-trial. But since it is required already that the BCC should issue a
notice of pre-trial within 5 calendar days after service and filing of the responsive
pleading, there is no need to worry that the case will not be set for pre-trial.
In line with A.M. No. 03-1-09-SC dated August 16, 2004 on the Guidelines to be
Observed by Trial Court Judges and Clerks of Court in the Conduct of Pre-trial and Use
of Deposition and Discovery Measures, the Sub-Committee members agreed that the
duty to set the case for pre-trial should no longer rest upon the plaintiff, but on the
BCC, who shall be required to schedule the same within 5 days from receipt of the last
responsive pleading. If the BCC fails to set the case for pre-trial, the plaintiff may still
file the proper motion to call the attention of the court, otherwise, the case may be
dismissed for failure to prosecute. It was explained that the plaintiff should no longer
be duty-bound to set the case for pre-trial, because the plaintiff may stall and cause
delay while trying to settle with the defendant. Besides, under special rules, it is the
BCC who shall set the case for pre-trial.
It was clarified that the reckoning of the 5-day period to set the case for pre-trial
should be after the last responsive pleading is served and filed, i.e., answer to a
complaint, or answer to a cross-claim or third-party complaint, without prejudice to the
filing of a reply based on an actionable document].
78
Deleted pursuant to the 2019 amendments because what is required now is
allegation of ultimate facts, including evidence; pleadings are now evidentiary.
Page 53 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
(h) Such other matters as may aid in the ii. Examine and make comparisons of
prompt disposition of the action. the adverse parties' evidence vis-a-
vis the copies to be marked;
79
Deleted pursuant to the 2019 amendments as it causes delay.
80
This is based on the Revised Guidelines for Continuous Trial of Criminal Cases.
81
This provision refers to instances when there are justifiable grounds for the
inability to present evidence during pre-trial.
Page 54 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
above.82
Section 3. Notice of pre-trial. – The notice of Section 3. Notice of pre-trial. — The notice of
pre-trial shall be served on counsel, or on the pre-trial shall include the dates respectively
party who has no counsel. The counsel set for:
served with such notice is charged with the
duty of notifying the party represented by (a) Pre-trial;
him. (b) Court-Annexed Mediation; and
(c) Judicial Dispute Resolution, if
necessary.
82
No blanket reservation to present evidence during pre-trial is allowed.
83
Both party and counsel must appear during pre-trial; the absence of one will
cause delay because pre-trial cannot proceed. Presence of plaintiff, but absence of
counsel without just cause during pre-trial will result in the dismissal of the complaint.
Presence the defendant, but absence of the counsel during pre-trial will result in the
presentation of plaintiff’s evidence ex parte. If both counsels of the parties are absent
during pre-trial, the judge should require both to explain, and make the appropriate
action on their explanation and their case.
Page 55 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
hereof. (3a)
Section 5. Effect of failure to appear. – The Section 5. Effect of failure to appear. — When
failure of the plaintiff to appear when so duly notified, the failure of the plaintiff and
required pursuant to the next preceding counsel to appear without valid cause
section shall be cause for dismissal of the when so required, pursuant to the next
action. The dismissal shall be with prejudice, preceding Section, shall cause the dismissal
unless otherwise ordered by the court. A of the action. The dismissal shall be with
similar failure on the part of the defendant prejudice, unless otherwise ordered by the
shall be cause to allow the plaintiff to present court. A similar failure on the part of the
his evidence ex parte and the court to render defendant and counsel shall be cause to
judgment on the basis thereof. allow the plaintiff to present his or her
evidence ex-parte within ten (10) calendar
days from termination of the pre-trial, and
the court to render judgment on the basis
of the evidence offered. (5a)
Section 6. Pre-trial brief. – The parties shall Section 6. Pre-trial brief. — The parties shall
file with the court and serve on the adverse file with the court and serve on the adverse
party, in such manner as shall ensure their party, in such manner as shall ensure their
receipt thereof at least three (3) days before receipt thereof at least three (3) calendar
the date of the pre-trial, their respective pre- days before the date of the pre-trial, their
trial briefs which shall contain, among respective pre-trial briefs which shall
others: contain, among others:
(a) A statement of their willingness to enter (a) A concise statement of the case and
into amicable settlement or alternative the reliefs prayed for;
modes of dispute resolution, indicating the
desired terms thereof; (b) A summary of admitted facts and
proposed stipulation of facts;
(b) A summary of admitted facts and
Page 56 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
proposed stipulation of facts; (c) The main factual and legal issues to
be tried or resolved;84
(c) The issues to be tried or resolved;
(d) The propriety of referral of factual
issues to commissioners;
(d) The documents or exhibits to be
presented, stating the purpose thereof; (e) The documents or other object
evidence to be marked,85 stating the
(e) A manifestation of their having availed or purpose thereof;
their intention to avail themselves of
discovery procedures or referral to (f) The names of the witnesses, and the
commissioners; and summary of their respective
testimonies; and
(f) The number and names of the witnesses,
and the substance of their respective (g) A brief statement of points of law
testimonies. and citation of authorities.
84
The judge should be proactive during pre trial, should limit the issues to be tried
and make proposals for stipulations and admissions, and not just leave them for
counsels to decide.
85
This is refers to the final marking of evidence attached to the pleadings during
pre-trial
Page 57 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
86
Then Associate Justice, now Chief Justice, Diosdado M. Peralta said that there are
problems on mediation: most judges do not like Judicial Dispute Resolution (JDR). He
suggested that JDR should be taken up later when the proposed amendments to the
provisions on pre-trial are discussed. The problem is that if the case goes to JDR, and
settlement fails, then the case goes to another judge for pre-trial. The pre-trial judge will
exchange the case subject of JDR with another (more difficult) case; sometimes, it is not
equal and judges take advantage of that, such as when they do not like the case.
Justice Peralta stressed that he is not against mediation, but the problem is why a
case should first undergo mediation and JDR without first going to pre-trial, when the
purpose of the pre-trial is to settle. The process in civil cases is very long. After the
issues are joined, civil cases will go to mediation for thirty (30) days, and if nothing
happens, another 30 days. And if nothing happens, it will go to another judge for JDR
within 30 days. If nothing happens, then another 30 days for pre-trial. If no settlement,
then the case will go to trial. Justice Peralta suggested that there should be a pre-trial
first, and if there is no settlement, then determine if there are genuine issues. If there are
no more genuine issues, then the case should go to mediation, but the issues should
already be defined so that the mediator will have an easier way of settling the parties,
because the focus will be on those issues not agreed upon by them.
Justice Peralta observed that sometimes mediation tends to delay proceedings in
civil cases. In fact, if a case goes to pre-trial, and the judge is good and there are no more
genuine issues, there could be a summary judgment or judgment on the pleadings.
Justice Peralta noted that while mediation and alternative dispute resolution are
provided for by law, JDR is a product of the Court.
Page 59 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
annexed mediation.
RULE 19
INTERVENTION
Section 1. Who may intervene.—A person who Section 1. Who may intervene. — A person
has a legal interest in the matter in litigation, who has a legal interest in the matter in
or in the success of either of the parties, or an litigation, or in the success of either of the
interest against both, or is so situated as to be parties, or an interest against both, or is so
adversely affected by a distribution or other situated as to be adversely affected by a
disposition of property in the custody of the distribution or other disposition of
court or of an officer thereof may, with leave property in the custody of the court or of
of court, be allowed to intervene in the an officer thereof may, with leave of court,
87
To address the concern of bias of the judge who will conduct both the JDR and
the trial of the same case, skills-based training of judges may be necessary to encourage
the parties to settle, but not to give conclusions on the strength or weakness of a case
based on the pleadings and evidence.
Page 60 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
action. The court shall consider whether or be allowed to intervene in the action. The
not the intervention will unduly delay or court shall consider whether or not the
prejudice the adjudication of the rights of the intervention will unduly delay or prejudice
original parties, and whether or not the the adjudication of the rights of the original
intervenor’s rights may be fully protected in parties, and whether or not the intervenor’s
a separate proceeding. (2[a], [b]a, R12) rights may be fully protected in a separate
proceeding. (1)
RULE 20
CALENDAR OF CASES
Page 61 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
RULE 21
SUBPOENA
Section 1. Subpoena and subpoena duces tecum. Section 1. Subpoena and subpoena duces tecum.
— Subpoena is a process directed to a person — Subpoena is a process directed to a person
requiring him to attend and to testify at the requiring him or her to attend and to testify
hearing or the trial of an action, or at any at the hearing or the trial of an action, or at
investigation conducted by competent any investigation conducted by competent
authority, or for the taking of his deposition. authority, or for the taking of his or her
It may also require him to bring with him deposition. It may also require him or her to
any books, documents, or other things under bring with him or her any books, documents,
his control, in which case it is called a or other things under his or her control, in
subpoena duces tecum. (1a, R23) which case it is called a subpoena duces
tecum. (1a)
Section 2. By whom issued.—The subpoena Section 2. By whom issued. — The subpoena
may be issued by— may be issued by –
a) the court before whom the witness a) the court before whom the witness
is required to attend; is required to attend;
b) the court of the place where the b) the court of the place where the
deposition is to be taken; deposition is to be taken;
d) any Justice of the Supreme Court or d) any Justice of the Supreme Court or
of the Court of Appeals in any case or the Court of Appeals in any case or
investigation pending within the Philippines. investigation pending within the Philippines.
Section 3. Form and contents.—A subpoena Section 3. Form and contents. — A subpoena
shall state the name of the court and the title shall state the name of the court and the title
of the action or investigation, shall be of the action or investigation, shall be
directed to the person whose attendance is directed to the person whose attendance is
required, and in the case of a subpoena duces required, and in the case of a subpoena duces
tecum, it shall also contain a reasonable tecum, it shall also contain a reasonable
description of the books, documents or description of the books, documents or
things demanded which must appear to the things demanded which must appear to the
court prima facie relevant. (3a, R23) court prima facie relevant. (3)
The court may quash a subpoena ad The court may quash a subpoena ad
testificandum on the ground that the witness testificandum on the ground that the witness
is not bound thereby. In either case, the is not bound thereby. In either case, the
subpoena may be quashed on the ground subpoena may be quashed on the ground
that the witness fees and kilometrage that the witness fees and kilometrage
allowed by these Rules were not tendered allowed by these Rules were not tendered
when the subpoena was served. (4a, R23) when the subpoena was served. (4)
without an order of the court. (5a, R23) without an order of the court. (5)
Page 64 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
the disobedience thereto shall be punished in not issued by a court, the disobedience
accordance with the applicable law or Rule thereto shall be punished in accordance with
(12a, R23) the applicable law or Rule. (9a)
RULE 22
COMPUTATION OF TIME
The day of the act that caused the The day of the act that caused the
interruption shall be excluded in the interruption shall be excluded in the
computation of the period. (n) computation of the period. (2)
RULE 23
DEPOSITIONS PENDING ACTIONS
Page 65 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 1. Depositions pending action, when Section 1. Depositions pending action, when
may be taken. – By leave of court after may be taken. — Upon ex parte motion of a
jurisdiction has been obtained over any party, the testimony of any person,
defendant or over property which is the whether a party or not, may be taken by
subject of the action, or without such leave deposition upon oral examination or
after an answer has been served, the written interrogatories. The attendance of
testimony of any person, whether a party or witnesses may be compelled by the use of a
not, may be taken, at the instance of any subpoena as provided in Rule 21.
party, by deposition upon oral examination Depositions shall be taken only in
or written interrogatories. The attendance of accordance with these Rules. The
witnesses may be compelled by the use of a deposition of a person confined in prison
subpoena as provided in Rule 21. may be taken only by leave of court on
Depositions shall be taken only in such terms as the court prescribes. (1a)
accordance with these Rules. The deposition
of a person confined in prison may be taken
only by leave of court on such terms as the
court prescribes. (1a, R24)
Section 4. Use of depositions.—At the trial or Section 4. Use of depositions. — At the trial
upon the hearing of a motion or an or upon the hearing of a motion or an
interlocutory proceeding, any part or all of a interlocutory proceeding, any part or
deposition, so far as admissible under the all of a deposition, so far as admissible
rules of evidence, may be used against any under the rules of evidence, may be used
party who was present or represented at the against any party who was present or
taking of the deposition or who had due represented at the taking of the deposition
notice thereof, in accordance with any one of or who had due notice thereof, in
Page 66 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Page 67 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Page 68 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 10. Persons before whom depositions Section 10. Persons before whom depositions
may be taken within the Philippines.—Within may be taken within the Philippines. — Within
the Philippines, depositions must be taken the Philippines, depositions may be taken
before any judge, notary public, on the before any judge, notary public, or the
person referred to in section 14 hereof. (10a, person referred to in Section 14 hereof. (10)
R24)
Section 11. Persons before whom depositions Section 11. Persons before whom depositions
may be taken in foreign countries.—In a foreign may be taken in foreign countries. —In a
state or country, depositions may be taken foreign state or country, depositions may
(a) on notice before a secretary of embassy or be taken (a) on notice before a secretary of
legation, consul general, consul, vice-consul, embassy or legation, consul general,
or consular agent of the Republic of the consul, vice-consul, or consular agent of the
Philippines; (b) before such person or officer Republic of the Philippines; (b) before such
as may be appointed by commission or person or officer as may be appointed by
under letters rogatory; or (c) the person commission or under letters rogatory; or (c)
referred to in section 14 hereof. (11a, R24) the person referred to in Section 14 hereof.
(11)
Page 69 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 15. Deposition upon oral examination; Section 15. Deposition upon oral
notice; time and place.—A party desiring to examination; notice; time and place. — A
take the deposition of any person upon oral party desiring to take the deposition of any
examination shall give reasonable notice in person upon oral examination shall give
writing to every other party to the action. reasonable notice in writing to every other
The notice shall state the time and place for party to the action. The notice shall state
taking the deposition and the name and the time and place for taking the deposition
address of each person to be examined, if and the name and address of each person
known, and if the name is at known, a to be examined, if known, and if the name
general description sufficient to identify him is not known, a general description
or the particular class or group to which he sufficient to identify him or her or the
belongs. On motion of any party upon whom particular class or group to which he or she
the notice is served, the court may for cause belongs. On motion of any party upon
shown enlarge or shorten the time. (15, R24) whom the notice is served, the court may
for cause shown enlarge or shorten the
time. (15a)
Section 16. Orders for the protection of parties Section 16. Orders for the protection of parties
and deponents.— After notice is served for and deponents. — After notice is served for
taking a deposition by oral examination, taking a deposition by oral examination,
upon motion seasonably made by any party upon motion seasonably made by any
or by the person to be examined and for party or by the person to be examined and
good cause shown, the court in which the for good cause shown, the court in which
action is pending may make an order that the action is pending may make the
the deposition shall not be taken, or that it following orders:
may be taken only at some designated place (a) That the deposition shall not be
other than that stated in the notice, or that it taken;
may be taken only on written interrogatories, (b) That the deposition may be
or that certain matters shall not be inquired taken only at some designated
into, or that the scope of the examination place other than that stated in
shall be held with no one present except the the notice;
parties to the action and their officers or (c) That the deposition may be
counsel, or that after being sealed the taken only on written
deposition shall be opened only by order of interrogatories;
the court, or that secret processes (d) That certain matters shall not be
developments, or research need not be inquired into;
disclosed, or that the parties shall (e) That the scope of the
simultaneously filed specified documents or examination shall be held with
information enclosed in sealed envelope to no one present except the
be opened as directed by the court; or the parties to the action and their
court may make any other order which officers or counsel;
justice requires to protect the party or (f) That after being sealed the
witness from annoyance, embarrassment, or deposition shall be opened only
Page 70 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 17. Record of examination; oath; Section 17. Record of examination; oath;
objections.—The officer before whom the objections. — The officer before whom the
deposition is to be taken shall put the deposition is to be taken shall put the
witness or oath and shall personally, or by witness on oath and shall personally, or by
some one acting under his direction and in some one acting under his or her direction
his presence, record the testimony of the and in his or her presence, record the
witness. The testimony shall be taken testimony of the witness. The testimony
stenographically unless the parties agree shall be taken stenographically unless the
otherwise. All objections made at the time of parties agree otherwise. All objections
the examination to the qualifications of the made at the time of the examination to the
officer taking the deposition, or to the qualifications of the officer taking the
manner of taking it, or to the evidence deposition, or to the manner of taking it, or
presented, or to the conduct of any party, to the evidence presented, or to the
and any other objection to the proceedings, conduct of any party, and any other
shall be noted by the officer upon the objection to the proceedings, shall be noted
deposition. Evidence objected to shall be by the officer upon the deposition.
taken subject to the objections. In lieu of Evidence objected to shall be taken subject
participating in the oral examination, parties to the objections. In lieu of participating in
served with notice of taking a deposition the oral examination, parties served with
may transmit written interrogatories to the notice of taking a deposition may transmit
officers, who shall propound them to the written interrogatories to the officers, who
witness and record the answers verbatim. (17, shall propound them to the witness and
R24) record the answers verbatim. (17a)
Trial Court of the place where the deposition pending or the Regional Trial Court of the
is being taken may order the officer place where the deposition is being taken
conducting the examination to cease may order the officer conducting the
forthwith from taking the deposition, or may examination to cease forthwith from taking
limit the scope and manner of the taking of the deposition, or may limit the scope and
the deposition, as provided in section 16 of manner of the taking of the deposition, as
this Rule. If the order made terminates the provided in Section 16 of this Rule. If the
examination, it shall be resumed thereafter order made terminates the examination, it
only upon the order of the court in which the shall be resumed thereafter only upon the
action is pending. Upon demand of the order of the court in which the action is
objecting party or deponent, the taking of the pending. Upon demand of the objecting
deposition shall be suspended for the time party or deponent, the taking of the
necessary to make a notice for an order. In deposition shall be suspended for the time
granting or refusing such order, the court necessary to make a notice for an order. In
may impose upon either party or upon the granting or refusing such order, the court
witness the requirement to pay such costs or may impose upon either party or upon the
expenses as the court may deem reasonable. witness the requirement to pay such costs
(18a, R24) or expenses as the court may deem
reasonable. (18)
Section 19. Submission to witness; changes; Section 19. Submission to witness; changes;
signing.—When the testimony is fully signing. — When the testimony is fully
transcribed, the deposition shall be transcribed, the deposition shall be
submitted to the witness for examination submitted to the witness for examination
and shall be read to or by him, unless such and shall be read to or by him or her,
examination and reading are waived by the unless such examination and reading are
witness and by the parties. Any changes in waived by the witness and by the parties.
form or substance which the witness desires Any changes in form or substance which
to make shall be entered upon the deposition the witness desires to make shall be
by the officer with a statement of the reasons entered upon the deposition by the officer
given by the witness for making them. The with a statement of the reasons given by
deposition shall then be signed by the the witness for making them. The
witness, unless the parties by stipulation deposition shall then be signed by the
waive the signing or the witness is ill or witness, unless the parties by stipulation
cannot be found or refuses to sign. If the waive the signing or the witness is ill or
deposition is not signed by the witness, the cannot be found or refuses to sign. If the
officer shall sign it and state on the record deposition is not signed by the witness, the
the fact of the waiver or of the illness or officer shall sign it and state on the record
absence of the witness or the fact of the the fact of the waiver or of the illness or
refusal to sign together with the reason given absence of the witness or the fact of the
therefor, if any, and the deposition may then refusal to sign together with the reason
be used as fully as though signed, unless on given therefor, if any, and the deposition
a motion to suppress under section 29 (f) of may then be used as fully as though
this Rule, the court holds that the reasons signed, unless on a motion to suppress
given for the refusal to sign require rejection under Section 29(f) of this Rule, the court
Of the deposition in whole or in part. (19a, holds that the reasons given for the refusal
R24) to sign require rejection of the deposition in
whole or in part. (19a)
Page 72 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 20. Certification and filing by officer.— Section 20. Certification and filing by officer.
The officer shall certify on the deposition — The officer shall certify on the
that the witness was duly sworn to by him deposition that the witness was duly sworn
and that the deposition is a true record of the to by him or her and that the deposition is
testimony given by the witness. He shall a true record of the testimony given by the
then securely seal the deposition in an witness. He or she shall then securely seal
envelope indorsed with the title of the action the deposition in an envelope indorsed
and marked “Deposition of (here insert the with the title of the action and marked
name of witness)” and shall promptly file it "Deposition of (here insert the
with the court in which the action is pending name of witness)" and shall promptly file it
or send it by registered mail to the clerk with the court in which the action is
thereof for filing. (20, R24) pending or send it by registered mail to the
clerk thereof for filing. (20a)
Section 21. Notice of filing.—The officer taking Section 21. Notice of filing. — The officer
the deposition shall give prompt notice of its taking the deposition shall give prompt
filing to all the parties. (21, R24) notice of its filing to all the parties. (21)
Section 23. Failure to attend of party giving Section 23. Failure to attend of party giving
notice.—If the party giving the notice of the notice. — If the party giving the
taking of a deposition fails to attend and notice of the taking of a deposition fails to
proceed therewith and another attends in attend and proceed therewith and another
person or by counsel pursuant to the notice, attends in person or by counsel pursuant to
the court may order the party giving the the notice, the court may order the party
notice to pay such other party the amount of giving the notice to pay such other party
the reasonable expenses incurred by him and the amount of the reasonable expenses
his counsel in so attending including incurred by him or her and his or her
reasonable attorney’s fees. (23a, R24) counsel in so attending, including
reasonable attorney's fees. (23a)
Section 24. Failure of party giving notice to Section 24. Failure of party giving notice to
serve subpoena.— If the party giving the serve subpoena. — If the party giving the
notice of the taking of a deposition of a notice of the taking of a deposition of a
witness fails to serve a subpoena upon him witness fails to serve a subpoena upon him
and the witness because of such failure does or her and the witness because of such
not attend, and if another party attends in failure does not attend, and if another party
person or by counsel because he expects the attends in person or by counsel because he
deposition of that witness to be taken, the or she expects the deposition of that
court may order the party giving the notice witness to be taken, the court may order
to pay to such other party the amount of the the party giving the notice to pay such
Page 73 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
reasonable expenses incurred by him and his other party the amount of the reasonable
counsel in so attending including reasonable expenses incurred by him or her and his or
attorney’s fees. (24a, R24) her counsel in so attending, including
reasonable attorney's fees. (24a)
Section 25. Deposition upon written Section 25. Deposition upon written
interrogatories; service of notice and of interrogatories; service of notice and of
interrogatories.—A party desiring to take the interrogatories. — A party desiring to take
deposition of any person upon written the deposition of any person upon written
interrogatories shall serve them upon every interrogatories shall serve them upon every
other party with a notice stating the name other party with a notice stating the name
and address of the person who is to answer and address of the person who is to answer
them and the name of descriptive title and them and the name or descriptive title and
address of the officer before whom the address of the officer before whom the
deposition is to be taken. Within ten (10) deposition is to be taken. Within ten (10)
days thereafter, a party so served may serve calendar days thereafter, a party so served
cross-interrogatories upon the party may serve cross-interrogatories upon the
proposing to take the deposition. Within five party proposing to take the deposition.
(5) days thereafter, the latter may serve re- Within five (5) calendar days thereafter the
direct interrogatories upon a party who has latter may serve re-direct interrogatories
served cross-interrogatories. Within three (3) upon a party who has served cross-
days after being served with re-direct interrogatories. Within three (3) calendar
interrogatories, a party may serve recross- days after being served with re-direct
interrogatories upon the party proposing to interrogatories, a party may serve recross-
take the deposition. (25, R24) interrogatories upon the party proposing to
take the deposition. (25a)
Section 26. Officers to take responses and Section 26. Officers to take responses and
prepare record.—A copy of the notice and prepare record. — A copy of the notice and
copies of all interrogatories served shall be copies of all interrogatories served shall be
delivered by the party taking the deposition delivered by the party taking the
to the officer designated in the notice, who deposition to the officer designated in the
shall proceed promptly, in the manner notice, who shall proceed promptly, in the
provided by sections 17, 19 and 20 of this manner provided by Sections 17, 19 and
Rule, to take the testimony of the witness in 20 of this Rule, to take the testimony of the
response to the interrogatories and to witness in response to the interrogatories
prepare, certify, and filed or mail the and to prepare, certify, and file or mail the
deposition, attaching thereto the copy of the deposition, attaching thereto the
notice and the interrogatories received by copy of the notice and the interrogatories
him. (26, R24) received by him or her. (26a)
Section 27. Notice of filing and furnishing Section 27. Notice of filing and furnishing
copies.—When a deposition upon copies. —When a deposition upon
interrogatories is filed, the officer taking it interrogatories is filed, the officer taking it
shall promptly give notice thereof to all the shall promptly give notice thereof to all the
parties, and may furnish copies to them or to parties and may furnish copies to them or
the deponent upon payment of reasonable to the deponent upon payment of
charges therefor. (27, R24) reasonable charges therefor. (27)
Page 74 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 28. Orders for the protection of parties Section 28. Orders for the protection of parties
and deponents.—After the service of the and deponents. — After the service of the
interrogatories and prior to the taking of the interrogatories and prior to the taking of
testimony of the deponent, the court in the testimony of the deponent, the court in
which the action is pending, on motion which the action is pending, on motion
promptly made by a party or a deponent, promptly made by a party or a deponent,
and for good cause shown, may make any and for good cause shown, may make any
order specified in sections 15, 16 and 18 of order specified in Sections 15, 16 and 18 of
this Rule which is appropriate and just or an this Rule which is appropriate and just or
order that the deposition shall not be taken an order that the deposition shall not be
before the officer designated in the notice or taken before the officer designated in the
that it shall not be taken except upon oral notice or that it shall not be taken except
examination. (28a, R24) upon oral examination. (28)
RULE 24
DEPOSITIONS BEFORE ACTION OR PENDING APPEAL
Section 1. Depositions before action; petition. Section 1. Depositions before action; petition.
—A person who desires to perpetuate his — A person who desires to perpetuate
own testimony or that of another person his or her own testimony or
regarding any matter that may be that of another person regarding any
cognizable in any court of the Philippines, matter that may be cognizable in any
may filed a verified petition in the court of court of the Philippines, may file a
the place of the residence of any expected verified petition in the court of the
adverse party. (1a, R134) place of the residence of any expected
Page 76 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 4. Order and examination.—If the Section 4. Order and examination. — If the
court is satisfied that the perpetuation of court is satisfied that the perpetuation of
the testimony may prevent a failure or the testimony may prevent a failure or
delay of justice, it shall make an order delay of justice, it shall make an order
designating or describing the persons designating or describing the persons
whose deposition may be taken and whose deposition may be taken and
specifying the subject matter of the specifying the subject matter of the
Page 77 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
examination and whether the depositions examination and whether the depositions
shall be taken upon oral examination or shall be taken upon oral examination or
written interrogatories. The depositions written interrogatories. The depositions
may then be taken in accordance with Rule may then be taken in accordance with
23 before the hearing. (4a, R134) Rule 23 before the hearing. (4)
Section 5. Reference to court.—For the purpose Section 5. Reference to court. — For the
of applying Rule 23 to depositions for purpose of applying Rule 23 to depositions
perpetuating testimony, each reference for perpetuating testimony, each reference
therein to the court in which the action is therein to the court in which the action is
pending shall be deemed to refer to the court pending shall be deemed to refer to the
in which the petition for such deposition was court in which the petition for such
filed. (5a, R134) deposition was filed. (5)
under the same conditions as are prescribed thereupon the depositions may be taken
in these Rules for depositions taken in and used in the same manner and under
pending actions. (7a, R134) the same conditions as are prescribed in
these Rules for depositions taken in
pending actions. (7a)
RULE 25
INTERROGATORIES TO PARTIES
Page 79 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
answered by the same party. (4) answered by the same party. (4)
Section 6. Effect of failure to serve written Section 6. Effect of failure to serve written
interrogatories.— Unless thereafter allowed interrogatories. — Unless thereafter allowed
by the court for good cause shown and to by the court for good cause shown and to
prevent a failure of justice, a party not served prevent a failure of justice, a party not
with written interrogatories may not be served with written interrogatories may
compelled by the adverse party to give not be compelled by the adverse party to
testimony in open court, or to give a give testimony in open court, or to give a
deposition pending appeal. (n) deposition pending appeal. (6)
RULES 26
ADMISSION BY ADVERSE PARTY
Section 1. Request for admission.—At any time Section 1. Request for admission. — At any
after issues have been joined, a party may time after issues have been joined, a party
file and serve upon any other party a written may file and serve upon any other party a
request for the admission by the latter of the written request for the admission by the
genuineness of any material and relevant latter of the genuineness of any material
document described in and exhibited with and relevant document described in and
the request or of the truth of any material exhibited with the request or of the truth of
and relevant matter of fact set forth in the any material and relevant matter of fact set
request. Copies of the documents shall be forth in the request. Copies of the
delivered with the request unless copies documents shall be delivered with the
have already been furnished. (1a) request unless copies have already been
furnished. (1)
Page 80 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 4. Withdrawal.—The court may allow Section 4. Withdrawal. — The court may
the party making an admission under this allow the party making an admission
Rule, whether express or implied, to under this Rule, whether express or
withdraw or amend it upon such terms as implied, to withdraw or amend it upon
may be just. (4) such terms as may be just. (4)
Section 5. Effect of failure to file and serve Section 5. Effect of failure to file and serve
request for admission.—Unless otherwise request for admission. — Unless otherwise
allowed by the court for good cause shown allowed by the court for good cause shown
and to prevent a failure of justice, a party and to prevent a failure of justice, a party
who fails to file and serve a request for who fails to file and serve a request for
admission on the adverse party of material admission on the adverse party of material
and relevant facts at issue which are, or and relevant facts at issue which are, or
ought to be, within the personal knowledge ought to be, within the personal knowledge
of the latter, shall not be permitted to present of the latter, shall not be permitted to
evidence on such facts. (n) present evidence on such facts. (5)
RULES 27
PRODUCTION OR INSPECTION OF DOCUMENTS OR THINGS
Page 81 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
RULES 28
PHYSICAL AND MENTAL EXAMINATION OF PERSONS
Section 1. When examination may be ordered.— Section 1. When examination may be ordered.
In an action in which the mental or physical — In an action in which the mental or
condition of a party is in controversy, the physical condition of a party is in
court in which the action is pending may in controversy, the court in which the action
its discretion order him to submit to a is pending may in its discretion order him
physical or mental examination by a or her to submit to a physical or mental
physician. (1) examination by a physician. (1a)
Section 2. Order for examination.—The order Section 2. Order for examination. — The
for examination may be made only on order for examination may be made only
motion for good cause shown and upon on motion for good cause shown and upon
notice to the party to be examined and to all notice to the party to be examined and to
other parties, and shall specify the time, all other parties, and shall specify the time,
place, manner, conditions and scope of the place, manner, conditions and scope of the
examination and the person or persons by examination and the person or persons by
whom it is to be made. (2) whom it is to be made. (2)
Page 82 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
RULES 29
REFUSAL TO COMPLY WITH MODES OF DISCOVERY
Page 83 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 3. Other consequences.—If any party or Section 3. Other consequences. — If any party
an officer or managing agent of a party or an officer or managing agent of a party
refuses to obey an order made under section refuses to obey an order made under
1 of this Rule requiring him to answer Section 1 of this Rule requiring him or her
designated questions, or an order under Rule to answer designated questions, or an
27 to produce any document or other thing order under Rule 27 to produce any
for inspection copying or photographing or document or other thing for inspection,
to permit it to be done, or to permit entry copying, or photographing or to permit it
upon land or other property, or an order to be done, or to permit entry upon land or
made under Rule 28 requiring him to submit other property, or an order made under
to a physical or mental examination, the Rule 28 requiring him or her to submit to a
court may make such orders in regard to the physical or mental examination, the court
refusal as are just, and among others the may make such orders in regard to the
following: refusal as are just, and among others the
following:
Page 84 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
(a) An order that the matters (a) (a) An order that the matters
regarding which the questions were regarding which the questions were
asked, or the character or description of asked, or the character or
the thing or land, or the contents of the description of the thing or land, or
paper, or the physical or mental the contents of the paper, or the
condition of the party or any other physical or mental condition of the
designated facts shall be taken to be party, or any other designated facts
established for the purposes of the action shall be taken to be established for
in accordance with the claim of the party the purposes of the action in
obtaining the order; accordance with the claim of the
party obtaining the order;
(b) An order refusing to allow the
disobedient party to support or oppose (b) An order refusing to allow the
designated claims or defenses or disobedient party to support or
prohibiting him from introducing in oppose designated claims or
evidence designated documents or defenses or prohibiting him or her
things or items of testimony, or from from introducing in evidence
introducing evidence of physical or designated documents or things or
mental condition; items of testimony, or from
introducing evidence of physical or
(c) An order striking out mental condition;
pleadings or parts thereof, or staying
further proceedings until the order is (c) An order striking out pleadings or
obeyed, or dismissing the action or parts thereof, or staying further
proceeding or any part thereof or proceedings until the order is
rendering a judgment by default against obeyed, or dismissing the action or
the disobedient party; and proceeding or any part thereof, or
rendering a judgment by default
(d) In lieu of any of the foregoing against the disobedient party; and
orders or in addition thereto, an order
directing the arrest of any party or agent (d) In lieu of any of the foregoing
of party for disobeying any of such orders or in addition thereto, an
orders except an order to submit to a order directing the arrest of any
physical or mental examination. (3a) party or agent of a party for
disobeying any of such orders
except an order to submit to a
physical or mental examination.
(3a)
expenses incurred in making such proof, requiring the other party to pay him or her
including attorney’s fees. Unless the court the reasonable expenses incurred in
finds that there were good reasons for the making such proof, including reasonable
denial or that admissions sought were of no attorney's fees. Unless the court finds that
substantial importance, such order shall be there were good reasons for the denial or
issued. (4a) that admissions sought were of no
substantial importance, such order shall be
issued. (4a)
Section 6. Expenses against the Republic of the Section 6. Expenses against the
Philippines.—Expenses and attorney’s fees Republic of the Philippines. —Expenses and
are not to be imposed upon the Republic of attorney’s fees are not to be imposed upon
the Philippines under this Rule.(6) the Republic of the Philippines under this
Rule. (6)
RULE 30
TRIAL
Section 1. Notice of trial. – Upon entry of a Section 1. Schedule of trial. — The parties
case in the trial calendar, the clerk shall shall strictly observe the scheduled
notify the parties of the date of its trial in hearings as agreed upon and set forth in
such manner as shall ensure his receipt of the pre-trial order.
that notice at least five (5) days before such
date. (2a, R22) (a) The schedule of the trial dates, for both
plaintiff and defendant, shall be
continuous and within the following
periods:
Page 86 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
88
Deleted because judicial affidavits are now required to be attached to the
pleadings, and the materiality or relevancy of evidence can now be determined from the
said affidavits.
Page 88 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 5. Order of trial. –Subject to the Section 5. Order of trial. — Subject to the
provisions of section 2 of Rule 31, and unless provisions of Section 2 of Rule 31, and
the court for special reasons otherwise unless the court for special reasons
directs, the trial shall be limited to the issues otherwise directs, the trial shall be limited
stated in the pre-trial order and shall proceed to the issues stated in the pre-trial order
as follows: and shall proceed as follows:
(a) The plaintiff shall adduce evidence in (a) The plaintiff shall adduce evidence in
support of his complaint; support of his or her complaint;
(b) The defendant shall then adduce (b) The defendant shall then adduce
evidence in support of his defense, evidence in support of his or her
counterclaim, cross-claim and third-party defense, counterclaim, cross-claim and
complaint; third-party complaint;
Section 6. Agreed statement of facts. – The Section 7. Agreed statement of facts. — The
parties to any action may agree, in writing, parties to any action may agree, in writing,
upon the facts involved in the litigation, and upon the facts involved in the litigation,
submit the case for judgment on the facts and submit the case for judgment on the
agreed upon, without the introduction of facts agreed upon, without the introduction
evidence. of evidence.
If the parties agree only on some of the facts If the parties agree only on some of the
in issue, the trial shall be held as to the facts in issue, the trial shall be held as to the
disputed facts in such order as the court shall disputed facts in such order as the court
prescribe. (2a, R30) shall prescribe. (6)
laws. (8a)
Section 9. Judge to receive evidence; delegation Section 9. Judge to receive evidence; delegation
to clerk of court. – The judge of the court to clerk of court. — The judge of the court
where the case is pending shall personally where the case is pending shall personally
receive the evidence to be adduced by the receive the evidence to be adduced by the
parties. However, in default or ex parte parties. However, in default or ex parte
hearings, and in any case where the parties hearings, and in any case where the parties
agree in writing, the court may delegate the agree in writing, the court may delegate the
reception of evidence to its clerk of court reception of evidence to its clerk of court
who is a member of the bar. The clerk of who is a member of the bar. The clerk of
court shall have no power to rule on court shall have no power to rule on
objections to any question or to the objections to any question or to the
admission of exhibits, which objections shall admission of exhibits, which objections
be resolved by the court upon submission of shall be resolved by the court upon
his report and the transcripts within ten (10) submission of his or her report and the
days from termination of the hearing. (n) transcripts within ten (10) calendar days
from termination of the hearing. (9a)
RULES 31
CONSOLIDATION OR SEVERANCE
RULES 32
TRIAL BY COMMISSIONER
Page 91 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
(a) When the trial of an issue of fact (a) When the trial of an issue of fact
requires the examination of a long account requires the examination of a long account
on either side, in which case the commis- on either side, in which case the
sioner may be directed to hear and report commissioner may be directed to hear and
upon the whole issue or any specific report upon the whole issue or any specific
question involved therein; question involved therein;
(b) When the taking of an account is (b) When the taking of an account is
necessary for the information of the court necessary for the information of the court
before judgment, or for carrying a judgment before judgment, or for carrying a
or order into effect; judgment or order into effect;
(c) When a question of fact, other (c) When a question of fact, other than
than upon the pleadings, arises upon motion upon the pleadings, arises upon motion or
or otherwise, in any stage of a case, or for otherwise, in any stage of a case, or for
carrying a judgment or order into effect. (2a, carrying a judgment or order into effect. (2)
R33)
Section 3. Order of reference; powers of the Section 3. Order of reference; powers of the
commissioner.— When a reference is made, commissioner. — When a reference is made,
the clerk shall forthwith furnish, the the clerk shall forthwith furnish the
commissioner with a copy of the order of commissioner with a copy of the
reference. The order may specify or limit the order of reference. The order may specify
powers of the commissioner, and may direct or limit the powers of the commissioner,
him to report only upon particular issues, or and may direct him or her to report only
to do or perform particular acts, or to receive upon particular issues, or to do or perform
and report evidence only, and may fix the particular acts, or to receive and report
date for beginning and closing the hearings evidence only, and may fix the date for
and for the filing of his report. Subject to the beginning and closing the hearings and for
specifications and limitations stated in the the filing of his or her report. Subject to the
order, the commissioner has and shall specifications and limitations stated in the
exercise the power to regulate the order, the commissioner has and shall
Page 92 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
proceedings in every hearing before him and exercise the power to regulate the
to do all acts and take all measures necessary proceedings in every hearing before him or
or proper for the efficient performance of his her and to do all acts and take all measures
duties under the order. He may issue necessary or proper for the efficient
subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum, swear performance of his or her duties under the
witnesses, and unless otherwise provided in order. He or she may issue subpoenas and
the order of reference, he may rule upon the subpoenas duces tecum, swear witnesses,
admissibility of evidence. The trial or and unless otherwise provided in the
hearing before him shall proceed in all order of reference, he or she may rule upon
respects as it would if held before the court. the admissibility of evidence. The trial or
(3a, R33) hearing before him or her shall proceed in
all respects as it would if held before the
court. (3a)
Page 93 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 8. Commissioner shall avoid delays.—It Section 8. Commissioner shall avoid delays. —
is the duty of the commissioner to proceed It is the duty of the commissioner to
with all reasonable diligence. Either party, proceed with all reasonable diligence.
on notice to the parties and commissioner, Either party, on notice to the parties and
may apply to the court for an order requiring commissioner, may apply to the court for
the commissioner to expedite the an order requiring the commissioner to
proceedings and to make his report. (8a, R33) expedite the proceedings and to make his
or her report. (8a)
Section 10. Notice to parties of the filing of Section 10. Notice to parties of the
report.—Upon the filing of the report, the filing of report. — Upon the filing of the
parties shall be notified by the clerk, and report, the parties shall be notified by the
they shall be allowed ten (10) days within clerk, and they shall be allowed ten (10)
which to signify grounds of objections to the calendar days within which to signify
findings of the report, if they so desire. grounds of objections to the findings of the
Objections to the report based upon grounds report, if they so desire. Objections to the
which were available to the parties during report based upon grounds which were
the proceedings before the commissioner, available to the parties during the
other than objections to the findings and proceedings before the commissioner, other
conclusions therein set forth, shall not be than objections to the findings and
considered by the court unless they were conclusions therein set forth, shall not be
made before the commissioner. (10, R33) considered by the court unless they were
made before the commissioner. (10a)
Section 11. Hearing upon report.—Upon the Section 11. Hearing upon report. — Upon the
expiration of the period of ten (10) days expiration of the period of ten (10) calendar
referred to in the preceding section, the days referred to in the preceding section,
report shall be set for hearing, after which the report shall be set for hearing, after
the court shall issue an order adopting, which the court shall issue an order
modifying, or rejecting the report in whole or adopting, modifying, or rejecting the report
in part, or recommitting it with instructions, in whole or in part, or recommitting it with
or requiring the parties to present further instructions, or requiring the parties to
evidence before the commissioner or the present further evidence before the
Page 94 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
RULE 33
DEMURRER TO EVIDENCE
Section 1. Demurrer to evidence. – After the Section 1. Demurrer to evidence. — After the
plaintiff has completed the presentation of plaintiff has completed the presentation of
his evidence, the defendant may move for his or her evidence, the defendant may
dismissal on the ground that upon the facts move for dismissal on the ground that
and the law the plaintiff has shown no right upon the facts and the law the plaintiff has
to relief. If his motion is denied, he shall have shown no right to relief. If his or her
the right to present evidence. If the motion is motion is denied, he or she shall have the
granted but on appeal the order of dismissal right to present evidence. If the motion is
is reversed, he shall be deemed to have granted but on appeal the order of
waived the right to present evidence. (1a, dismissal is reversed, he or she shall be
R35) deemed to have waived the right to present
evidence. (1a)
RULE 34
JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
Page 95 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 1. Judgment on the pleadings. – Where Section 1. Judgment on the pleadings. – Where
an answer fails to tender an issue, or an answer fails to tender an issue, or
otherwise admits the material allegations of otherwise admits the material allegations of
the adverse party’s pleading, the court may, the adverse party’s pleading, the court may,
on motion of that party, direct judgment on on motion of that party, direct judgment on
such pleading. However, in actions for such pleading. However, in actions for
declaration of nullity or annulment of declaration of nullity or annulment of
marriage or for legal separation, the material marriage or for legal separation, the material
facts alleged in the complaint shall always be facts alleged in the complaint shall always be
proved. (1a, R19) proved. (1)
RULE 35
SUMMARY JUDGMENTS
Section 1. Summary judgment for claimant. — Section 1. Summary judgment for claimant. —
A party seeking to recover upon a claim, A party seeking to recover upon a claim,
counterclaim, or cross-claim or to obtain a counterclaim, or cross-claim or to obtain a
declaratory relief may, at any time after the declaratory relief may, at any time after the
pleading in answer thereto has been served, pleading in answer thereto has been served,
move with supporting affidavits, depositions move with supporting affidavits, depositions
or admissions for a summary judgment in or admissions for a summary judgment in
his favor upon all or any part thereof. (1a, his or her favor upon all or any part thereof.
R34) (1a)
Section 2. Summary judgment for defending Section 2. Summary judgment for defending
party. — A party against whom a claim, party. — A party against whom a claim,
counterclaim, or cross-claim is asserted or a counterclaim, or cross-claim is asserted or a
declaratory relief is sought may, at any time, declaratory relief is sought may, at any time,
Page 96 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
move with supporting affidavits, depositions move with supporting affidavits, depositions
or admissions for a summary judgment in or admissions for a summary judgment in
his favor as to all or any part thereof. (2a, his or her favor as to all or any part thereof.
R34) (2a)
Section 3. Motion and proceedings thereon. – Section 3. Motion and proceedings thereon. —
The motion shall be served at least ten (10) The motion shall cite the supporting
days before the time specified for the affidavits, depositions or admissions, and
hearing. The adverse party may serve the specific law relied upon. The adverse
opposing affidavits, depositions, or party may file a comment and serve
admissions at least three (3) days before the opposing affidavits, depositions, or
hearing. After the hearing, the judgment admissions within a non-extendible period
sought shall be rendered forthwith if the of five (5) calendar days from receipt of the
pleadings, supporting affidavits, depositions, motion. Unless the court orders the conduct
and admissions on file, show that, except as of a hearing, judgment sought shall be
to the amount of damages, there is no rendered forthwith if the pleadings,
genuine issue as to any material fact and that supporting affidavits, depositions and
the moving party is entitled to a judgment as admissions on file, show that, except as to
a matter of law. (3a, R34) the amount of damages, there is no genuine
issue as to any material fact and that the
moving party is entitled to judgment as a
matter of law.
Section 4. Case not fully adjudicated on motion. Section 4. Case not fully adjudicated on motion.
– If on motion under this Rule, judgment is — If on motion under this Rule, judgment is
not rendered upon the whole case or for all not rendered upon the whole case or for all
the reliefs sought and a trial is necessary, the the reliefs sought and a trial is necessary, the
court at the hearing of the motion, by court may, by examining the pleadings and
examining the pleadings and the evidence the evidence before it and by interrogating
before it and by interrogating counsel shall counsel, ascertain what material facts exist
ascertain what material facts exist without without substantial controversy, including
substantial controversy and what are the extent to which the amount of damages
actually and in good faith controverted. It or other relief is not in controversy, and
shall thereupon make an order specifying the direct such further proceedings in the action
facts that appear without substantial as are just. The facts so ascertained shall be
controversy, including the extent to which deemed established, and the trial shall be
the amount of damages or other relief is not conducted on the controverted facts
in controversy, and directing such further accordingly. (4a)
proceedings in the action as are just. The
facts so specified shall be deemed
established, and the trial shall be conducted
on the controverted facts accordingly. (4a,
R34)
Page 97 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Section 5. Form of affidavits and supporting Section 5. Form of affidavits and supporting
papers. — Supporting and opposing papers. — Supporting and opposing
affidavits shall be made on personal affidavits shall be made on personal
knowledge, shall set forth such facts as knowledge, shall set forth such facts as
would be admissible in evidence, and shall would be admissible in evidence, and shall
show affirmatively that the affiant is show affirmatively that the affiant is
competent to testify to the matters stated competent to testify to the matters stated
therein. Certified true copies of all papers or therein. Certified true copies of all papers or
parts thereof referred to in the affidavit shall parts thereof referred to in the affidavit shall
be attached thereto or served therewith. (5a, be attached thereto or served therewith. (5)
R34)
Section 6. Affidavits in bad faith. — Should it Section 6. Affidavits in bad faith. — Should it
appear to its satisfaction at any time that any appear to its satisfaction at any time that any
of the affidavits presented pursuant to this of the affidavits presented pursuant to this
Rule are presented in bad faith, or solely for Rule are presented in bad faith, or solely for
the purpose of delay, the court shall the purpose of delay, the court shall
forthwith order the offending party or forthwith order the offending party or
counsel to pay to the other party the amount counsel to pay to the other party the amount
of the reasonable expenses which the filing of the reasonable expenses which the filing
of the affidavits caused him to incur of the affidavits caused him or her to incur,
including attorney's fees, it may, after including attorney's fees, it may, after
hearing further adjudge the offending party hearing further adjudge the offending party
or counsel guilty of contempt. (6a, R34) or counsel guilty of contempt. (6a)
RULE 144
EFFECTIVENESS
These rules shall take effect on These rules shall take effect on
January 1, 1964. They shall govern all cases January 1, 1964. They shall govern all cases
brought after they take effect, and also all brought after they take effect, and also all
further proceedings in cases then pending, further proceedings in cases then pending,
except to the extent that in the opinion of the except to the extent that in the opinion of the
court, their application would not be feasible court, their application would not be feasible
or would work injustice, in which even the or would work injustice, in which even the
former procedure shall apply. former procedure shall apply.
Page 98 of 99
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Page 99 of 99