Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Abstract
Background: Unwanted facial hair can have adverse psychological effects on women and reduce their quality of life.
Objective: To assess the effects of unwanted facial hair removal with laser on improving quality of life. Methods: In this study,
70 patients treated for unwanted facial hair by laser were assessed by Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) question-
naire on admission and 3 months later after three sessions of laser treatment. Results: The DLQI score before treatment
was 9.42 ⫾ 5.99, which was reduced to 3.12 ⫾ 3.40 after laser treatment (p ⬍ 0.05). Conclusion: Unwanted facial hair
removal with laser can improve the quality of life of patients.
Correspondence: Alireza Firooz, Center for Research and Training in Skin Diseases and Leprosy, 79 Taleghani Avenue, Tehran 14166, Iran. Fax: 98 21
88978190. E-mail: fi rozali@sina.tums.ac.ir
questionnaire (10). They were asked to complete the improved by 5 points, which is close to the findings
same questionnaire 3 months later after three ses- of this study (a reduction of 6 points in DLQI score
sions of laser treatment with a long pulse alexandrite after laser treatment).
laser on a monthly basis. Each patient scored 0–3 for The efficiency of various laser systems in the reduc-
10 items in the questionnaire based on the impact of tion of unwanted hair is well documented (7). It has
unwanted hair: very much ⫽ 3; a lot ⫽ 2; a little ⫽1; also been shown that hair reduction induced by laser
and not at all ⫽ 0. The collected data were analyzed will last several months and can be considered perma-
by SPSS 16 software using a paired sample t-test for nent (14). This study showed a significant improve-
comparison of DLQI scores before and after treat- ment in the quality of life of patients with unwanted
ment. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statis- facial hair. The limitation of this study is the lack of
tically significant. long-term follow-up. The second DLQI was com-
pleted after three sessions of laser, although the major-
ity of patients undergo more frequent treatment
Results sessions. On the other hand, it is recommended to
evaluate the patients several (at least 6) months after
The mean DLQI score before treatment was 9.42 ⫾
the last session of laser treatment to assess the long-
5.99; 3 months later after three sessions of laser treat-
term effects on quality of life. Also, social and eco-
ment this was reduced to 3.12 ⫾ 3.40 ( p ⬍ 0.05).
nomic aspects of laser therapy should be studied in the
future as this treatment is expensive and requires sev-
eral treatment sessions. Similar studies on patients
Discussion
undergoing laser treatment for sites other than the face
In this study, we showed that the quality of life of and also on male subjects will provide more informa-
women suffering from facial hirsutism significantly tion on the effect of laser treatment on quality of life.
improved after treatment with a long pulse alexan-
drite laser using a validated Persian translation of the
DLQI instrument. Although several studies have Acknowledgement
evaluated the quality of life of women with polycystic
ovary syndrome (11–13), there have been few studies Hereby, sincere cooperation of the medical and nurs-
assessing quality of life in patients with hirsutism ing staff of the Dowlati Skin Clinic and Novin Dide-
using the standard DLQI. One of these studies, how- gan Clinic in performing this study is appreciated.
ever, observed 45 hirsute women (all with brown,
dark or black hair) who had gone to a laser clinic and Declaration of interest: The authors report no
were treated with long pulsed ruby, diode and alex- conflicts of interest. The authors alone are respon-
andrite lasers. These patients reported a high level of sible for the content and writing of the paper.
patient satisfaction (71.1%) and willingness to
undergo further treatment (77.85%) despite the fact
that 97.1% had unwanted hair reappearance, as References
much after 6 months as it had been pretreatment. 1. Azziz R. The evaluation and management of hirsutism. Obstet
From this group, 15 patients answered a modified Gynecol. 2003;101(5 Pt 1):995–1007.
DLQI questionnaire immediately before and at vary- 2. Cronin L, Guyatt G, Griffith L, Wong E, Azziz R, Futterweit
ing intervals (up to 6 months) after laser treatment. W, et al. Development of a health-related quality-of-life ques-
tionnaire (PCOSQ) for women with polycystic ovary syn-
They also filled out a complementary questionnaire drome (PCOS). J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 1998;83(6):
including details such as treatment efficacy, side 1976–87.
effects, hair re-growth and also the time passing 3. Guyatt G, Weaver B, Cronin L, Dooley JA, Azziz R. Health
between laser treatment and unwanted hair reap- Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (PCOSQ) for women
pearance. The patients were subdivided to three with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). J Clin Epidemiol.
2004;57(12):1279–87.
groups according to the second time of completing 4. Loo WJ, Langin SW. Laser treatment improves quality of life
the questionnaire: 2 months, 2–4 months, and 4–6 of hirsute females. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2002;27(6):439–41.
months after first interview. There was a significant 5. Lipton MG, Sherr L, Elford J, Rustin MH, Clayton WJ.
improvement in DLQI scores at 1–2 months but Women living with facial hair: The psychological and behav-
longer-term benefit was not observed (5). ioral burden. J Psychosom Res. 2006;61(2):161–8.
6. Dawber RP. Guidance for the management of hirsutism. Curr
In another study, 38 patients with severe facial Med Res Opin. 2005;21(8):1227–34.
hirsutism completed a modified DLQI questionnaire 7. Haedersdal M, Wulf HC. Evidence-based review of hair
as well as a visual analogue scoring system and an removal using laser and light sources. J Eur Acad Dermatol
‘out-of-10’ scoring system before and after three Venereol. 2006;20(1):9–20.
laser treatments with a long pulse alexandrite laser 8. Wanner M. Laser hair removal. Dermatol Ther. 2005;18(3):
209–16.
at 4–6-week intervals. Also, the patients were scored 9. Conroy FJ, Venus M, Monk B. A qualitative study to assess
independently by a doctor and a nurse. Following the effectiveness of laser epilation using a quality-of-life scor-
laser epilation, the mean DLQI scores of patients ing system. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2006;31(6):753–6.
Laser hair removal effect on life quality 9
10. Aghaei S, Sodaifi M, Jafari P, Mazharinia N, Finlay AY. DLQI 13. Trent ME, Rich M, Austin SB, Gordon CM. Fertility con-
scores in vitiligo: Reliability and validity of the Persian ver- cerns and sexual behavior in adolescent girls with polycystic
sion. BMC Dermatol. 2004;4:8. ovary syndrome: Implications for quality of life. J Pediatr Ado-
11. Hahn S, Janssen OE, Tan S, Pleger K, Mann K, Schedlowski lesc Gynecol. 2003;16(1):33–7.
M, et al. Clinical and psychological correlates of quality-of- 14. Davoudi SM, Behnia F, Gorouhi F, Keshavarz S, Nassiri
life in polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2005; Kashani M, Rashighi Firoozabadi M, et al. Comparison of
153(6):53–60. long-pulsed alexandrite and Nd:YAG lasers, individually and
12. McCook JG, Reame NE, Thatcher SS. Health-related quality in combination, for leg hair reduction: An assessor-blinded,
of life issues in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J randomized trial with 18 months of follow-up. Arch Derma-
Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2005;34(1):12–20. tol. 2008;144(10):1323–7.
Copyright of Journal of Cosmetic & Laser Therapy is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may
not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written
permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
Copyright of Journal of Cosmetic & Laser Therapy is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may
not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written
permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.