Subjective exploration and quantitative examination are two unmistakable exploration techniques

with various qualities and shortcomings. Quantitative examination is much of the time utilized more
regularly than subjective exploration because of the accompanying reasons:

1 Objectivity and generalizability: Quantitative exploration is in many cases considered more

evenhanded than subjective examination since it utilizes mathematical information and measurable
examination. The consequences of quantitative examination can be handily summed up to a bigger
populace, making it more helpful for making expectations or proposals.

2 Reproducibility: Quantitative exploration techniques are in many cases more normalized and
repeatable, which makes it simpler to recreate the review and approve the outcomes.

3 Subsidizing and time imperatives: Quantitative examination frequently requires bigger spending
plans and additional opportunity to finish than subjective exploration, which can restrict its
utilization in specific settings.

4 Prioritization of logical objectivity: established researchers frequently esteems objectivity,

meticulousness, and generalizability above different variables, which can add to the inclination for
quantitative exploration.

Notwithstanding, subjective exploration has special qualities, for example, its capacity to give top to
bottom bits of knowledge and comprehension of mind boggling peculiarities, and to investigate
abstract encounters and discernments. Subjective examination can likewise be utilized to create
speculations and to advise the advancement regarding quantitative exploration studies.
Consequently, it is essential to consider the examination question and reason while choosing an
exploration procedure, as opposed to depending entirely on the accessibility of assets or the social
prioritization of quantitative examination.

imple and cross tabulation are two different methods of analyzing data in
research.

Simple tabulation is a method of summarizing data by counting the

number of observations that fall into different categories. For example, if we
conducted a survey of 100 people and asked them about their favorite fruit,
we could create a simple tabulation by counting the number of people who
selected each fruit. The results might look something like this:
 Fruit Number of People

Apple 30

Banana 20

Orange 25

Pineapple 15

Total 100

In this simple tabulation, we can see the number of people who selected
each fruit as well as the total number of people in the survey.

Cross tabulation, on the other hand, is a method of analyzing the

relationship between two or more variables by creating a table that shows
the frequency of each combination of values. For example, if we wanted to
explore the relationship between fruit preference and gender, we could
create a cross-tabulation that shows the number of men and women who
selected each fruit. The results might look something like this:

Fruit Men Women Total

Apple 15 15 30
 Fruit Men Women Total

Banana 10 10 20

Orange 12 13 25

Pineapple 8 7 15

Total 45 45 90

In this cross-tabulation, we can see the frequency of each combination of

fruit preference and gender. For example, 15 men and 15 women selected
apple as their favorite fruit, while 10 men and 10 women selected banana,
and so on. Cross-tabulation allows us to explore the relationship between
variables and identify any patterns or trends that may exist.