You are on page 1of 22

Accepted Manuscript

Association of first-trimester angiogenic factors with placental histological findings in


late-onset preeclampsia

Stefania Triunfo, MD PhD, Francesca Crovetto, MD, Fatima Crispi, MD PhD, Victor
Rodriguez-Sureda, PhD, Carmen Dominguez, PhD, Alfons Nadal, MD PhD, Anna
Peguero, MD, Eduard Gratacos, MD PhD, Francesc Figueras, MD PhD
PII: S0143-4004(16)30056-X
DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2016.04.005
Reference: YPLAC 3393

To appear in: Placenta

Received Date: 8 February 2016


Revised Date: 4 April 2016
Accepted Date: 5 April 2016

Please cite this article as: Triunfo S, Crovetto F, Crispi F, Rodriguez-Sureda V, Dominguez C, Nadal
A, Peguero A, Gratacos E, Figueras F, Association of first-trimester angiogenic factors with placental
histological findings in late-onset preeclampsia, Placenta (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2016.04.005.

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to
our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all
legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 Association of first-trimester angiogenic factors with placental histological findings in late-
2 onset preeclampsia
3
4
5 Stefania Triunfo1, MD, PhD; Francesca Crovetto1,2, MD; Fatima Crispi1, MD, PhD; Victor Rodriguez-
6 Sureda3, PhD, Carmen Dominguez3, PhD; Alfons Nadal4, MD, PhD; Anna Peguero1, MD; Eduard
7 Gratacos1, MD, PhD; Francesc Figueras1, MD, PhD.
8
1
9 BCNatal - Barcelona Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Hospital Clínic and Hospital

PT
10 Sant Joan de Deu), IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, and Centre for Biomedical Research on Rare
11 Diseases (CIBER-ER), Barcelona, Spain.
2
12 Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Dipartimento Ostetricia e Ginecologia; Università degli

RI
13 Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
3
14 Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Research Centre for Nanomedicine, Hospital Univeritari Vall d-
15 Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Centre for Biomedical Research on rare Disease (CIBERER), Instituto de

SC
16 Salud Carlos III, Spain.
4
17 Department of Pathology, Hospital Clinic-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
18
19
20
U
AN
21
22
M

23 Correspondence and reprint request to


24 Stefania Triunfo
25 Maternal-Fetal Medicine Department
D

26 Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona


27 Sabino de Arana 1, 08028
TE

28 Barcelona
29 Spain
30 Telephone: +34 93 227 5600
31 Fax: +34 (0) 93 227 5605
EP

32 E-mail: TRIUNFO@clinic.ub.es
33
34
C

35
AC

36
37
38
39
40 SHORT TITLE
41 Angiogenic factors and placental findings in late-onset preeclampsia with placental insufficiency
42

1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 ABSTRACT

2 Objective: To explore in women with late-onset preeclampsia (PE) the association between maternal
3 levels of angiogenic/antiangiogenic factors in the first trimester of pregnancy and histological
4 findings attributable to placental underperfusion (PUP).

5 Methods: A nested case-control cohort study was conducted in 73 women with pregnancies

PT
6 complicated by late-onset PE (>34 weeks at delivery) matched with controls. First trimester uterine
7 artery Doppler (UtA); maternal levels of placental growth factor (PlGF) and soluble fms-like tyrosine
8

RI
kinase-1 (sFlt-1) were retrieved. Placentas were histologically evaluated using a hierarchical and
9 standardized classification system. One-way ANOVA with linear polynomial contrast or linear-by-
10 linear association test was performed to test the hypothesis of a linear association across study

SC
11 groups (controls, PE without PUP and PE with PUP).

U
12 Results: In 54 (74%) placentas, 89 placental histological findings qualifying for PUP were found.
13 Across study groups, significant values were observed in maternal levels of decreased PlGF (MoM
AN
14 values: 1.53, 1.41 and 1.37; p<0.001), increased sFlt-1 (MoM values: 3.11, 3.11 and 3.22; p=0.002),
15 increased sFlt-1/PlGF ratio (MoM values: 2.3, 2.3 and 2.44; p<0.001), abnormal UtA Doppler (MoM
M

16 values: 1, 1.26 and 1.32; p<0.001), and worse perinatal outcomes in terms of gestational age at
17 delivery, cesarean section for not reassuring fetal status, birth weight and neonatal acidosis.
D

18 Discussion: In late-onset PE an imbalance of circulating angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors


TE

19 already present at 8-10 weeks of pregnancy was associated with histological findings reflecting
20 placental insufficiency. An early first trimester screening by angiogenic factors might help to identify
21
EP

patients with placental involvement among late-onset PE cases.

22 Conclusion: In late-onset preeclampsia, first-trimester uterine Doppler and circulating levels of


C

23 angiogenic/antiangiogenic factors are associated with placental underperfusion.


24
AC

25
26
27
28 KEYWORDS

29 Preeclampsia; First trimester screening; Placental growth factor; Soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1;
30 Histological Findings; Placental underperfusion.
31

2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 HIGHLIGHTS (separate file, 85 characters totally).
2  Late-onset preeclampsia is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes.
3  First study to investigate the relationship between first trimester PlGF-sFlt-1 and placental
4 histology.
5  First trimester PlGF and sFlt-1 levels are associated with histological placental insufficiency.
6
7

PT
8
9
10

RI
11
12

SC
13
14 ABBREVIATIONS

15 PE: preeclampsia;
U
AN
16 FGR: fetal growth restriction;
17 GA: gestational age;
M

18 PlGF: placental growth factor;


19 sFlt-1: soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1;
D

20 MoM: multiples of normal median;


21 EFW: estimated fetal weight;
TE

22 UtA: uterine artery;


23 UA: umbilical artery;
EP

24 MCA: middle cerebral artery;


25 CPR: cerebroplacental ratio;
26 PI: Doppler pulsatility index;
C

27 BW: birth weight;


AC

28 PUP: placental underperfusion


29

3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 INTRODUCTION

2 Preeclampsia (PE) is a major contributor to maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality [1,2].
3 Accumulating evidence indicates that a central feature in the pathophysiology of PE is a failure of the
4 physiologic transformation of spiral arteries [3-6]. Although the primary insults for these
5 abnormalities remain elusive [7,8], it is postulated that the resulting poor placentation and reduced
6 blood supply to the placenta in early pregnancy lead to the release of factors into the maternal

PT
7 circulation causing the systemic manifestations of the syndrome.

RI
While this pathophysiology is behind the vast majority of cases of early-onset PE, in late-onset PE
9 there is a broader spectrum of involved mechanisms [9]. This has a major clinical impact because
10 whilst a combination of maternal characteristics and some biomarkers (such as blood pressure (BP)

SC
11 and uterine Doppler evaluation) at first-early second trimesters predict most cases that develop
12 early-onset PE, this same predictive strategy fails to detect the majority of instances of late-onset PE

U
13 [10]. This poor predictive performance could be overcome by a better phenotyping of the late PE
AN
14 syndrome, similarly what has been proposed in other obstetric syndromes (i.e. prematurity) [11].

15 A proportion of women with late-onset PE had signs of placental insufficiency at histological


M

16 evaluation [12], and they exhibited an imbalance in their angiogenic profile [13]. Increased risks of
17 adverse perinatal outcome have been described in presence of simultaneous late-onset PE and
D

18 placental insufficiency [14]. It follows from this evidence that for an efficient prevention of late-
19 onset PE, targeting those instances that exhibit placental insufficiency is key. However, it remains
TE

20 unclear whether late-onset PE cases with true placental under perfusion already show an imbalance
21 in their angiogenic profile in the first trimester. This could help to define predictive and preventive
EP

22 strategies.

23 The aim of this study was to explore the association between maternal plasma concentrations of
C

24 angiogenic factors in the first trimester of pregnancy and histological findings attributable to PUP in
AC

25 late-onset PE.

26
27

4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

1 PATIENTS AND METHODS

2 Participants
3 A nested case-control study nested in a cohort of unselected singleton pregnancies referred for
4 routine first-trimester screening for aneuploidies (11+0-13+6 weeks of gestation) was conducted.
5 Eligible cases were women without chronic hypertension subsequently developing late-onset PE

PT
6 (delivering above 34 weeks of gestation). Cases were matched with controls, defined as pregnancies
7 not complicated by PE delivering immediately after each case. Exclusion criteria were congenital
8

RI
malformations and suspected chorioamnionitis.
9 Plasmatic levels of angiogenic factors were determined in stored samples. Gestational age (GA) in all
10 pregnancies was calculated based on the crown-rump length (CRL) at first-trimester ultrasound [15].

SC
11 The local Ethics Committee approved the study protocol and each patient provided written informed
12 consent.

13 Data collection
U
AN
14 Baseline maternal characteristics, including age, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), parity, maternal
15 and paternal smoking, known chronic disease (i.e., diabetes mellitus, renal disease, and autoimmune
M

16 disorders), and obstetric history were recorded in the hospital database upon study admittance. Data
17 on postpartum follow-up or subsequent complications of pregnancy, ultrasound evaluations, and
D

18 perinatal outcomes were also collected prospectively.


TE

19 Outcome measures
20 PE was defined according to the guidelines of the International Society for the Study of Hypertension
21
EP

in Pregnancy. This requires two recordings of systolic BP ≥140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg at
22 least 4 h apart in previously normotensive women after 20 weeks of gestation, and proteinuria of
23 300 mg or more in 24 h [16].
C

24 Small for gestational age (SGA) newborns were defined with birth weight below the 10th centile
AC

25 according to local standards [17].


26 Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) fetus was defined with an estimated fetal weight (EFW) below
27 the 10th centile according to local standards [17], with abnormalities in Doppler evaluation
28 (cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) < 5th centile or uterine artery (UtA) Doppler pulsatility index (PI) > 95th
29 centile) [18,19].

30 Biophysical parameters

31 In each patient transvaginal UtA Doppler assessment was performed at the time of first-trimester

5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 scan (11+0- 13+6 weeks of gestation) in order to measure the PI in the left and right uterine arteries,
2 as previously described [18]. Maternal BP was recorded at time of ultrasound with automated
3 devices OMRON M6 Comfort (OMRON Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was
4 measured in one arm (right or left) while women were seated and after a 5-minute rest. MAP was
5 calculated as: diastolic BP + (systolic BP – diastolic BP)/3.

6 Blood sampling and testing procedures

PT
7 Venous blood samples were drawn from each woman between 8+0 and 11+6 weeks’ gestation
8

RI
(mean 10.6, SD 3.85). They were collected in an EDTA-containing tube and processed within one
9 hour. Plasma was separated by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C, and samples were
10 immediately stored at -80°C until assayed.

SC
11 Levels of PlGF and sFlt-1 in maternal plasma were measured by the corresponding ELISA kits
12 according to the manufacturer's instructions (R&D Systems Europe Ltd, Abingdon, UK). The assay kits

U
13 used detect only free analytics, not the bound fractions. All samples were collected, handled, and
AN
14 stored under the same conditions and tested in duplicate. Plate-to-plate variability was controlled by
15 running an internal control along the samples. Test sera and matched controls were simultaneously
16 and blindly run on the same plates. Intra-assay (<5%) and inter-assay (10%) precision of all kits were
M

17 consistent. Linear regression coefficients of standard curves were never <0.99.


D

18 Clinical management
TE

19 Deliveries were attended by a staff obstetrician blinded to angiogenic factor determinations.


20 Continuous fetal heart monitoring was performed during labor, graded (normal, suspicious, or
21
EP

abnormal) in terms of presence, type, and length of decelerations; bradycardia; tachycardia; and
22 assessment of variability [20,21]. In instances of two or more suspicious variables or with at least one
23 abnormal parameter unresponsive to digital fetal scalp stimulation, fetal scalp blood pH was tested
C

24 [22]. Any pH value <7.15 or <7.20 on two attempts 30 min apart were regarded as abnormal [22].
AC

25 Cesarean section was done for non-reassuring fetal status, based on intrapartum fetal abnormalities
26 in heart rate and scalp blood pH [22]. Cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal status was indicated
27 for a persistently abnormal heart tracing after pessary withdrawal, oxytocin suspension, and a 10-
28 minute intravenous infusion of ritrodine (200 μg/min). All cases with adverse outcome were formally
29 assessed to ensure that the management protocol had been followed correctly.

30 Placental evaluation

6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 Placental examinations adhered to standard laboratory protocol. Fresh and trimmed (after removal
2 of the membranes, cord, and any blood clots, the placenta) placental weight were recorded.
3 Trimmed placental weight centiles were assigned based on GA-specific placental weight charts [23].
4 The feto-placental weight ratio (birth weight: fresh placental weight) was also expressed as a
5 percentile, drawn from GA-specific ranges [24].
6 Placentas were fixed in 10% buffered formalin. After gross examination, routine samples of each

PT
7 specimen were taken for routine processing: one transverse section of cord, one rolled strip of
8 membranes, and three blocks of villous parenchyma. All macroscopic lesions were sampled as well.
9 Finished slides were hematoxylin and eosin-stained. A single senior pathologist (AN) supervised all

RI
10 examinations. For purposes of this study PUP-related histologic manifestations were further
11 designated as maternal or fetal in origin [25,26].

SC
12 Among maternal vascular supply disruptions, specific vascular alterations qualifying for maternal
13 vascular maldevelopment were: superficial implantation/decidual arteriopathy (acute atherosis and

U
14 mural hypertrophy [mean wall diameter>30% of overall vessel diameter of arterioles in the decidua
AN
15 parietalis]), undergrowth/distal villous hypoplasia (decrease in the number and modal diameter of
16 distal villi at the center of the lobule after adjustment for plane of section and gestational age, in the
17 lower 75% of a full-thickness section), excessive intervillous fibrin (basal layer of fibrinoid material
M

18 involving > 30% of the placental maternal surface) and migration disorders. Specific vascular
19 alterations qualifying for maternal vascular obstruction were: syncytial knots involving terminal villi
D

20 (affecting >50% of the terminal villi), villous agglutination (>50%), villous agglutination (eccentric
TE

21 aggregates on intervillous fibrin on proximal and distal villi affecting >50% of the villi in a single slide)
22 and villous infarcts (>30% of villous loss). Specific vascular alterations qualifying for maternal vascular
23 loss of integrity were: arterial rupture (abruption placenta), venous rupture (acute chronic marginal
EP

24 abruption).
25 Among fetal vascular supply disruptions, lesions qualifying for maldevelopment were:
C

26 chorioangioma, chorioangiosis and distal villous immaturity. Lesions qualifying for obstruction were
27 considered those secondary to vascular thrombo-occlusive disease (thrombosis of chorionic plate
AC

28 and stem villous channels with distal villous avascularity affecting large groups).
29 When any of these lesions above described were present, the placental was considered to qualify for
30 PUP.

31 Statistical analysis

32 Normal distributions were assured by the Shapiro-Wilk test. One-way ANOVA with linear polynomial
33 orthogonal contrast or linear-by-linear association test X2 were used to test the hypothesis of linear

7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 trend across the study groups (controls, PE without PUP and PE with PUP) of quantitative and
2 qualitative variables, respectively.
3 All statistical analyses were performed with standard software (SPSS v. 20.0, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL,
4 USA), with statistical significance set at p<0.05. Graphs were constructed with R version 3.2.2 (The R
5 Foundation for Statistical Computing).
6

PT
7

RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC

8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 RESULTS

2 A total of 76 late-onset PE pregnancies were recruited for study. Of these, 3 were excluded because
3 of abnormalities detected in late pregnancy [(mild ventriculomegaly, (n=1); moderate pyelectasis
4 (n=1)] and suspected chorioamnionitis (n=1), leaving 73 cases for analysis matched with 73 controls.

5 In a total of 54 placentas (74%), 89 instances of PUP-related findings were identified (Table 1).

PT
6 Placentas with signs of underperfusion had non-significant lower mean values of weight (386.9 [SD
7 135.8] vs 400.7 [SD 120.6]; p=0.696) and fetoplacental weight ratio (6.7 [SD 3.6] vs 6.4 [SD
8

RI
3.2];p=0.733).

9 Table 2 details baseline and clinical characteristics of the study population, segregated by the

SC
10 presence of PUP-related changes. Caucasian ethnicity, BMI at beginning, smoking status and
11 obstetric history, including previous PE, FGR and stillbirth, were statistically significant among the

U
12 study groups. AN
13 Maternal BP, first trimester scan, uterine Doppler, and levels of angiogenic factor are itemized in
14 Table 3. Both biophysical (MAP, UtA) and biochemical (PlGF, sFlt-1) parameters significantly differed
15 in women that developed late-onset PE with signs of PUP. Figure 1 shows PlGF, sFlt-1 and ratio
M

16 distribution by the presence of signs of PUP.


D

17 Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of the study population are shown in Table 4. As expected, adverse
TE

18 perinatal outcomes, more frequent in cases with late-onset PE and signs of PUP, were statistically
19 significant.
EP

20
C
AC

9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 DISCUSSION

2 The present study shows that in late-onset PE, first trimester uterine Doppler and circulating levels of
3 angiogenic/antiangiogenic factors revealed a biological gradient between controls, PE without PUP
4 and PE with PUP.

5 The classification of PE into early- and late-onset has prognostic value, since early-onset disease is

PT
6 associated with higher perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality rates than late-onset disease,
7 mainly related to gestational age at delivery [27,28]. Moreover, as late-onset PE is far more
8

RI
prevalent than early-onset PE, it accounts for a larger etiological proportion of the occurrence of
9 adverse perinatal outcomes [29,30]. However, further phenotyping of cases with late-onset PE may
10 permit tailored management. Our results show that late-onset PE cases with unbalanced angiogenic

SC
11 profiles are at higher risk of adverse outcomes.

U
12 Several lines of evidence support the hypothesis that early- and late-onset PE may have different
13 pathophysiologic pathways. First, several recognized risk factors for PE such as maternal history of
AN
14 PE, chronic hypertension and use of drugs to induce ovulation seem to be more related to the early-
15 onset form of the disease [31]. Second, an increasing number of biochemical non-angiogenic [32-35]
M

16 and angiogenic markers have been shown to be also differentially associated with early disease.
17 Among the latter, sFlt-1 [36-39] and PlGF [40,41] are more frequently abnormal in early than in late
D

18 disease. Third, uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in the first [42,43] or second [44] trimester is also
19 more predictive of early than late-onset PE. As known, an inadequate remodeling of the spiral
TE

20 arteries may induce placental hypoxia and oxidative stress, and the subsequent association between
21 increased impedance to blood flow in the uterine arteries and early-onset PE suggests a greater
EP

22 contribution of PUP preceding early- than late-onset disease [45]. Fourth, the prevalence of placental
23 findings suggestive of maternal underperfusion in patients with PE decreased gradually with GA [46].
C

24 In addition, in a placental morphometric study, Egbor et al observed a significant reduction in the


25 volume and surface of the terminal villi in the placentas of patients with early-onset PE delivering
AC

26 before 34 weeks compared to gestational age-matched controls [47]. Differences in the placental
27 pathologic findings between early- and late-onset PE were confirmed in a small case-control study
28 showing higher rates of placental infarctions, decidual arteriopathy and villous hypermaturation in
29 early-onset than in late-onset PE [26].

30 Evidence of a relationship between maternal levels of angiogenic/anti-angiogenic factors in the first


31 trimester and placental findings in late-onset PE is scant, being described in only one previous study;
32 however, the authors evaluated it in the third trimester and reported low plasma concentrations of

10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 PlGF and higher sFlt-1 in the presence of placental lesions [46]. Our study adds to the growing body
2 of evidence by maintaining that an imbalance of angiogenic factors and PE are associated, and shows
3 that, to some extent, this link could be traced back to the first trimester.

4 At present, potential interventions exist to ameliorate this imbalance, such as early administration of
5 low-dose aspirin (LDA) and, hence, might provide opportunities to improve perinatal outcomes [48].
6 While LDA clearly reduces early-onset PE when started before 16 weeks, this strategy fails to reduce

PT
7 the incidence of term PE [8]. It could be speculated that, as late-onset PE is a heterogeneous
8 condition in which maternal predisposition and defective trophoblastic invasion contribute to

RI
9 variably in its pathophysiology, cases with evidence of an angiogenic imbalance are candidates for
10 such prophylaxis. We provide evidence that this imbalance could already be detected at first

SC
11 trimester, a period when LDA is most likely to be effective [7].

12 Strengths of this study are its prospective design, the application of validated and reproducible

U
13 histological criteria for classifying placental lesions, and the adjusted PlGF and sFlt-1 levels according
AN
14 to gestational age. Unfortunately, we must also concede some limitations. First, we evaluated the
15 angiogenic factors early in the first trimester (most cases before 10 weeks). It is likely that the
16 angiogenic imbalance would be more pronounced later in the first trimester. However, these
M

17 significant differences in pro and anti-angiogenic profile so early in pregnancies complicated by


18 placental under perfusion in late-onset PE could be valuable to placental literature. Secondly,
D

19 longitudinal angiogenic factor determinations may have shed more light on their temporal
TE

20 relationship with placental damage. Thirdly, no placental examinations, in term of weight,


21 placental/BW ratio, and histologic findings have been performed in the control group. Finally, the
22 limited sampling size renders our study inadequately powered to assess the potential impact of
EP

23 angiogenic factors within each category of PUP.


C

24 In conclusion, a subset of patients with late-onset PE already has an imbalance of angiogenic/anti-


25 angiogenic factors in maternal blood already present in the first trimester, and this finding is
AC

26 associated with a higher frequency of placental histological findings.


27
28

11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

2 This work was supported by grants from The Cerebra Foundation for the Brain Injured Child
3 (Carmarthen, Wales, UK), Obra Social “la Caixa” and AGAUR 2014 SGR grant nº 928. This publication
4 has been funded with support of the Erasmus + Programme of the European Union (Framework
5 Agreement number: 2013-0040). This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the
6 Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information
7 contained therein.

PT
8 The samples used in this study were provided by the Hospital Clínic-IDIBAPS Biobank with
9 appropriate ethical approval.
10

RI
11
12

SC
13
14

U
15 FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
AN
16 The authors have indicated that they have no financial relationships to disclose relevant to this
17 article.
18
M

19
20
D

21
22
TE

23 CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
24 The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.
EP

25
26
27
C

28
AC

29
30 CONDENSATION
31 This study is the first to ascertain the association between angiogenic factors evaluated at first
32 trimester and placental under perfusion-related histopathology in pregnancies complicated by late-
33 onset preeclampsia.
34
35
36
37

12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 Table 1. Categories/subcategories of placental attributes (n=89) consistent with under perfusion in
2 study population.

3
4
Categories of placental Subcategories
injury of placental injury
n (%) n (%)
Maldevelopment

PT
32 (42.1)
Maternal
Obstruction
vascular supply
39 (51.3)

RI
76 (85.4)
Loss of integrity
5 (6.6)

SC
Maldevelopment
4 (30.8)
Fetal
Obstruction
vascular supply
5 (38.4)

U
13 (14.6)
Loss of integrity
4 (30.8)
AN
5
M
D
TE
C EP
AC

13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 2. Baseline characteristics in pregnancies complicated by late-onset preeclampsia, with
and without placental signs attributable to PUP.

Controls PUP – PUP + Linear


Characteristics
(n=73) (n=19) (n=54) Tendency P†
Age (yrs) 32.4 (5.1) 33.2 (6.3) 32.4 (5.9) 0.947
BMI (Kg/m2) 23.5 (3.1) 25.4 (4.5) 25.5 (4.8) 0.005
Ethnicity

PT
White 53 (72.6) 12 (63.2) 30 (55.6) 0.046
Black 1 (1.4) 1 (5.3) 0 (0) 0.570
Latin-American 14 (19.2) 5 (26.2) 18 (33.3) 0.070

RI
Others 5 (6.8) 1 (5.3) 6 (11.1) 0.405
Smoking status
No smokers 63 (86.3) 16 (84.2) 48 (88.9) 0.687

SC
<10 7 (9.6) 3 (15.8) 5 (9.3) 0.002
≥10 3 (4.1) 0 (0) 1 (1.8)
Low SES* 35 (50) 8 (42.1) 20 (37.0) <0.001
Medical history

U
Chronic hypertension 1 (1.4) 2 (10.5) 4 (7.4) 0.102
0.806
AN
Diabetes mellitus 1 (1.4) 1 (5.3) 1 (1.8)
Renal disease 0 (0) 0 (0) 1(1.8) 0.842
Autoimmune disease 4 (5.5) 0 (0) 4 (7.4) 0.683
Coagulation disorders 1 (1.4) 0 (0) 2 (3.7) 0.381
M

Obstetric history
Nulliparous 46 (63) 13 (68.4) 34 (63) 0.985
Previous PE 2 (2.7) 1 (5.3) 10 (18.5) 0.002
D

Previous FGR 1 (1.4) 0 (0) 5 (9.3) 0.031


Previous stillbirth 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (5.6) 0.033
TE

ART 5 (6.5) 2 (10.5) 3 (5.6) 0.805

PUP: Placental under perfusion; BMI: Body-mass index; SES: socio-economic status; PE:
Preeclampsia; FGR: Fetal growth restriction; ART: Assisted reproductive technologies.
EP

*Routine occupations, long-term unemployment or never worked.


†StaZsZcally significant p<0.05 using one-way ANOVA with linear polynomial contrast or linear-
by-linear association test, as appropriate.
C

Data are expressed as median (SD) or n (%).


AC

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 3. Biophysical and biochemical parameters in pregnancies complicated by late-onset
preeclampsia, with and without placental signs attributable to PUP.

Controls PUP – PUP + Linear


Characteristics
(n=73) (n=19) (n=54) Tendency P†

Biophysical parameters
MAP (MoM) 0.96 (0.09) 1.11 (0.22) 1.08 (0.12) <0.001
CRL (mm) 62.8 (7.4) 64.2 (10.8) 65.7 (9.9) 0.068

PT
NT (MoM) 0.9 (0.3) 1.11 (0.31) 1.06 (0.36) 0.251
Mean UtA (MoM) 1 (0.35) 1.26 (0.38) 1.32 (0.46) <0.001

RI
Biochemical parameters
PlGF (MoM) 1.53 (0.21) 1.41 (0.25) 1.37 (0.26) <0.001
sFlt-1 (MoM) 3.11 (0.19) 3.11 (0.16) 3.22 (0.19) 0.002

SC
sFlt-1/ PlGF (MoM) 2.3 (0.27) 2.3 (0.56) 2.44 (0.53) <0.001

PUP: Placental under perfusion; MAP: Mean arterial pressure; MoM: Multiple of the expected
median; NT: Nucal translucency; UtA: Uterine artery; PI: Pulsatility index; PlGF: Placental growth

U
factor; sFlt-1: Soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1.
†StaZsZcally significant p<0.05 using one-way ANOVA with linear polynomial contrast or linear-
AN
by-linear association test, as appropriate.
Data are expressed as median (SD).
M

1
2
D

3
4
TE

5
6
EP

7
8
9
C

10
AC

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 Table 4. Obstetrical and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by late-onset preeclampsia,
2 with and without PUP.

Linear
Controls PUP – PUP +
Characteristics Tendency P†
(n=73) (n=19) (n=54)
GA at diagnosis of PE (wks) - 35.5 (4.5) 35.3 (3.8) 0.831‡
HELLP syndrome 0 (0) 4 (21.1) 3 (5.5) 0.089
Eclampsia 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (1.9) 0.224

PT
Abruptio placentae 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (1.9) 0.335
GA at delivery (wks) 39.6 (1.4) 36.0 (3.9) 35.6 (3.5) <0.001
CS for NRFS 5 (6.9) 5 (35.7) 12 (37.5) 0.014

RI
BW (g) 3394 (420) 2395 (1010) 2319.4 (948.6) <0.001
BW percentile 52.3 (20.1) 27.4 (32.7) 22.7 (30.6) <0.001
BW < 10th percentile 0 (0) 10 (52.6) 28 (51.9) <0.001
Male gender 36 (49.3) 7 (36.8) 23 (42.6) 0.429

SC
APGAR at 5 min <7 0 (0) 2 (1.1) 4 (1.9) 0.073
Neonatal acidosis (pH<7.10) 0 (0) 0 (0) 5 (9.3) 0.006
NICU admission 0 (0) 1 (5.3) 0 (0) 0.807

U
Placental weight (g) - 400.7 (120.6) 386.9 (135.8) 0.696‡
BW/Placental weight ratio - 6.4 (3.2) 6.7 (3.6) 0.733‡
AN
3
PUP: placental under perfusion; GA: Gestational age; PE: Preeclampsia; HELLP: Hemolysis,
Elevated Liver enzymes and Low Platelets; CS: Cesarean section; NRFS: Non-Reassuring Fetal
Status; BW: birth weight; NICU: neonatal intensive care unit.
M

†StaZsZcally significant p<0.05 using one-way ANOVA with linear polynomial contrast or
linear-by-linear association test, as appropriate.
‡ Only between cases (PUP+ vs. PUP -)
D

Data are expressed as median (SD) or n (%).


TE

4
5
6
7
EP

8
9
10
C

11
12
AC

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 Figure 1. Distribution of markers by study group.
2

PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC

17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC

18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 REFERENCES
2
3 [1] Conde-Agudelo A, Villar J, Lindheimer M. World Health Organization systematic review of screening
4 tests for preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:1367-1391.
5 [2] Duley L. The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Semin Perinatol 2009;33:130-137.
6 [3] Redman CW, Sargent IL. Latest advances in understanding preeclampsia. Science. 2005; 308:1592–4.
7 [4] Roberts JM, Gammill HS. Preeclampsia: recent insights. Hypertension. 2005;46:1243–1249.
8 [5] Silasi M, Cohen B, Karumanchi SA, Rana S. Abnormal placentation, angiogenic factors, and the
9 pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2010;37:239–253.
10 [6] Brosens I, Pijnenborg R, Vercruysse L, Romero R. The “Great Obstetrical Syndromes” are associated

PT
11 with disorders of deep placentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:193–201.
12 [7] Roberts JM1, Hubel CA. The two stage model of preeclampsia: variations on the theme. Placenta.
13 2009;30 Suppl A:S32-37.
14 [8] Gammill HS, Roberts JM. Emerging concepts in preeclampsia investigation. Front Biosci.

RI
15 2007;12:2403–2411.
16 [9] Kovo M, Schreiber L, Ben-Haroush A, Cohen G, Weiner E, Golan A, Bar J. The placental component in
17 early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia in relation to fetal growth restriction. Prenat Diagn

SC
18 2012;32:632-637.
19 [10] Crovetto F, Figueras F, Triunfo S, Crispi F, Rodriguez-Sureda V, Dominguez C, Llurba E, Gratacós E. First
20 trimester screening for early and late preeclampsia based on maternal characteristics, biophysical
21 parameters, and angiogenic factors. Prenat Diagn 2015;35:183-191.

U
22 [11] Kramer MS, Papageorghiou A, Culhane J, Bhutta Z, Goldenberg RL, Gravett M, Iams JD, Conde-Agudelo
23 A, Waller S, Barros F, Knight H, Villar J. Challenges in defining and classifying the preterm birth
24
AN
syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:108-112.
25 [12] Moldenhauer JS, Stanek J, Warshak C, Khoury J, Sibai B. The frequency and severity of placental
26 findings in women with preeclampsia are gestational age dependent. Am J Obstet Gynecol
27 2003;189:1173-1177.
28
M

[13] Soto E, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, Ogge G, Hussein Y, Yeo L, Hassan SS, Kim CJ, Chaiworapongsa T. Late-
29 onset preeclampsia is associated with an imbalance of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors in
30 patients with and without placental lesions consistent with maternal underperfusion. J Matern Fetal
31 Neonatal Med 2012;25:498-507.
D

32 [14] Masoura S, Kalogiannidis I, Makedou K, Theodoridis T, Koiou K, Gerou S, Athanasiadis A, Agorastos T.


33 Biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction in preeclampsia and neonatal morbidity: a case-control study.
TE

34 Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;175:119-123.


35 [15] Robinson HP, Sweet EM, Adam AH. The accuracy of radiological estimates of gestational age using
36 early fetal crown-rump length measurements by ultrasound as a basis for comparison. Br J Obstet
37 Gynaecol 1979;86:525-528.
EP

38 [16] Brown MA, Lindheimer MD, de Swiet M, Van Assche A, Moutquin JM. The classification and
39 diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: statement from the International Society for the
40 Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Hypertens Pregnancy 2001;20(1):IX-XIV.
41 [17] Figueras F, Meler E, Iraola A, Eixarch E, Coll O, Figueras J, Francis A, Gratacos E, Gardosi J. Customized
C

42 birthweight standards for a Spanish population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;136:20-24.
43 [18] Baschat AA, Gembruch U. The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
AC

44 2003;21:124-127.
45 [19] Gomez O, Figueras F, Fernandez S, Bennasar M, Martinez JM, Puerto B, Gratacos E. Reference ranges
46 for uterine artery mean pulsatility index at 11-41 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
47 2008;32:128-132.
48 [20] Altaf S, Oppenheimer C, Shaw R, Waugh J, Dixon-Woods M. Practices and views on fetal heart
49 monitoring: a structured observation and interview study. BJOG 2006; 113: 409-418.
50 [21] ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature,
51 interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 192-202.
52 [22] Gregg AR, Weiner CP. "Normal" umbilical arterial and venous acid-base and blood gas values. Clin
53 Obstet Gynecol 1993; 36 :24-32.
54 [23] lmog B, Shehata F, Aljabri S, Levin I, Shalom-Paz E, Shrim A. Placenta weightpercentile curves for
55 singleton and twins deliveries. Placenta;32(1):58e62.

19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 [24] Burkhardt T, Schaffer L, Schneider C, Zimmermann R, Kurmanavicius J.Reference values for the weight
2 of freshly delivered term placentas and forplacental weight-birth weight ratios. Eur J Obstet Gynecol
3 Reprod Biol2006;128(1e2):248e252.
4 [25] Redline RW, Heller D, Keating S, Kingdom J. Placental diagnostic criteria and clinical correlation a
5 workshop report. Placenta 2005;26(Suppl. A):S114e117.
6 [26] Redline RW. Placental pathology: a systematic approach with clinical correlations. Placenta
7 2008;29(Suppl. A):S86e91.
8 [27] Ganzevoort W, Rep A, de Vries JI, Bonsel GJ, Wolf H. Prediction of maternal complications and adverse
9 infant outcome at admission for temporizing management of early-onset severe hypertensive
10 disorders of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195:495–503.

PT
11 [28] Witlin AG, Saade GR, Mattar F, Sibai BM. Predictors of neonatal outcome in women with severe
12 preeclampsia or eclampsia between 24 and 33 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:607–
13 611.
14 [29] Harmon QE, Huang L, Umbach DM, et al. Risk of fetal death with preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol

RI
15 2015;125:628-635.
16 [30] Lisonkova S, Sabr Y, Mayer C, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with early-onset and late-onset
17 preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:771-781.

SC
18 [31] Poon LC, Kametas NA, Valencia C, Chelemen T, Nicolaides KH. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy:
19 screening by systolic diastolic and mean arterial pressure at 11-13 weeks. Hypertens Pregnancy
20 2011;30:93-107.
21 [32] Wikstrom AK, Nash P, Eriksson UJ, Olovsson MH. Evidence of increased oxidative stress and a change

U
22 in the plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1 to PAI-2 ratio in early-onset but not late-onset
23 preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 201:597–598.
24 [33] Gupta AK, Gebhardt S, Hillermann R, Holzgreve W, Hahn S. Analysis of plasma elastase levels in early
AN
25 and late onset preeclampsia. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006; 273:239–242.
26 [34] Vaisbuch E, Romero R, Mazaki-Tovi S, Erez O, Kim SK, Chaiworapongsa T, Gotsch F, Than NG, Dong Z,
27 Pacora P, et al. Retinol binding protein 4--a novel association with early-onset preeclampsia. J Perinat
28 Med. 2010; 38:129–139.
M

29 [35] Masuyama H, Segawa T, Sumida Y, Masumoto A, Inoue S, Akahori Y, Hiramatsu Y. Different profiles of
30 circulating angiogenic factors and adipocytokines between early- and late-onset pre-eclampsia. BJOG.
31 2010; 117:314–320.
D

32 [36] Crispi F, Llurba E, Dominguez C, Martin-Gallan P, Cabero L, Gratacos E. Predictive value of angiogenic
33 factors and uterine artery Doppler for early- versus late-onset pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth
TE

34 restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 31:303–309.


35 [37] Crispi F, Dominguez C, Llurba E, Martin-Gallan P, Cabero L, Gratacos E. Placental angiogenic growth
36 factors and uterine artery Doppler findings for characterization of different subsets in preeclampsia
37 and in isolated intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195:201–217.
38
EP

[38] Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Espinoza J, Bujold E, Mee KY, Goncalves LF, Gomez R, Edwin S.Evidence
39 supporting a role for blockade of the vascular endothelial growth factor system in the pathophysiology
40 of preeclampsia. Young Investigator Award. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1541–1547.
41 [39] Kusanovic JP, Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, Erez O, Mittal P, Vaisbuch E, Mazaki-Tovi S, Gotsch F,
C

42 Edwin SS, Gomez R, et al. A prospective cohort study of the value of maternal plasma concentrations
43 of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors in early pregnancy and midtrimester in the identification of
44
AC

patients destined to develop preeclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med.2009; 22:1021–38.


45 [40] Levine RJ, Lam C, Qian C, Yu KF, Maynard SE, Sachs BP, Sibai BM, Epstein FH, Romero R,Thadhani R, et
46 al. Soluble endoglin and other circulating antiangiogenic factors in preeclampsia. NEngl J Med. 2006;
47 355:992–1005.
48 [41] Romero R, Nien JK, Espinoza J, Todem D, Fu W, Chung H, Kusanovic JP, Gotsch F, Erez O, Mazaki-Tovi S,
49 et al. A longitudinal study of angiogenic (placental growth factor) and anti-angiogenic (soluble
50 endoglin and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1) factors in normal pregnancy and
51 patients destined to develop preeclampsia and deliver a small for gestational age neonate. J Matern
52 Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008; 21:9–23.
53 [42] Espinoza J, Romero R, Nien JK, Gomez R, Kusanovic JP, Goncalves LF, Medina L, Edwin S,Hassan S,
54 Carstens M, et al. Identification of patients at risk for early onset and/or severepreeclampsia with the
55 use of uterine artery Doppler velocimetry and placental growth factor. Am JObstet Gynecol. 2007;
56 196:326–313.

20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 [43] Melchiorre K, Wormald B, Leslie K, Bhide A, Thilaganathan B. First-trimester uterine artery Doppler
2 indices in term and preterm pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 32:133–137
3 [44] Papageorghiou AT, Yu CK, Bindra R, Pandis G, Nicolaides KH. Multicenter screening for pre-eclampsia
4 and fetal growth restriction by transvaginal uterine artery Doppler at 23 weeks of gestation.
5 Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 18:441–449.
6 [45] Roberts JM, Taylor RN, Goldfien A. Endothelial cell activation as a pathogenetic factor in preeclampsia.
7 Semin Perinatol. 1991; 15:86–93.
8 [46] Ogge G, Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Hussein Y, Kusanovic JP, Yeo L, Kim CJ, Hassan SS. Placental
9 lesions associated with maternal underperfusion are more frequent in early-onset than in late-onset
10 preeclampsia. J Perinat Med. 2011 Nov;39(6):641-652.

PT
11 [47] Egbor M, Ansari T, Morris N, Green CJ, Sibbons PD. Morphometric placental villous and vascular
12 abnormalities in early- and late-onset pre-eclampsia with and without fetal growth restriction. BJOG.
13 2006; 113:580–589.
14 [48] Chaiworapongsa T, Chaemsaithong P, Korzeniewski SJ, Yeo L, Romero R. Pre-eclampsia part 2:

RI
15 prediction, prevention and management. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2014 Sep;10(9):531-540.
16
17

U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC

21

You might also like