Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Punctum Books is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Anthropocene Unseen
This content downloaded from 168.176.5.118 on Sun, 02 Apr 2023 18:38:08 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
anthropocene unseen
324
This content downloaded from 168.176.5.118 on Sun, 02 Apr 2023 18:38:08 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
52
Plastic
Anand Pandian
This content downloaded from 168.176.5.118 on Sun, 02 Apr 2023 18:38:08 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
anthropocene unseen
326
This content downloaded from 168.176.5.118 on Sun, 02 Apr 2023 18:38:08 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Plastic
into the sea,” Bruno Munari once said, “and the sea hands it
back to you carved, finished, smooth, shiny or polished.” This
sea, this plastic sea, isn’t quite so artful. But remember that
plastic is much more than a thing. “Plastic,” Roland Barthes
tells us, “is the very idea of its infinite transformation.”
Call it the Plasticene, I say, this wine dark time of danger.
There are all those bottles, yes, those plastic sheets, and cups,
and wrappers. But there still remains, in all of these things,
the promise of change they were meant to carry. For we are
also plastic. And we can also bend, with them. We still have
the chance to learn, with these things and their buried ener-
gies, the most crucial lesson of all. What would it take to live
profoundly otherwise?
I tried with this video essay, Wine Dark Plastic Sea (Pandian
2015), to wrestle with the beauty and the terror of such trans-
formative potential. Its mood is mythopoetic. Plastic embod-
ies, like no other substance, the arc of utopian hope and deep
despair around the very possibility of fundamental change in
modern times (Meikle 1995). These materials convey the plastic-
ity (Malabou 2008) of human being, the power of encounters to
catalyze new modes of life. What if we learned to see such banal
and quotidian things — this construction tarp billowing over a
renovated rowhouse in Baltimore, for example — as openings
into a common pulse of existence, as fluid expressions of the
ceaseless “play of forces and waves of forces” evoked by Frie-
drich Nietzsche (1968, 550), rather than as isolated and finished
forms of consumer satisfaction?
For these objects, after all, have destinations far beyond our
sidewalks and wastebins, passing into the muddied tides (Capps
2015), ash-flecked skies, and grotesque bellies of our time (Karu-
na Society for Animals and Nature, n.d.). And they begin as well
with life and death, as fossil fuels, with the “animal bodies in the
browned oil procured from the distillation of fossilized things,”
as the Russian scientist Mikhael Lomonosov first speculated in
1757. Say we confronted more squarely these chemical, biologi-
cal, and geological currents eddying in the stuff of our lives.
327
This content downloaded from 168.176.5.118 on Sun, 02 Apr 2023 18:38:08 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
anthropocene unseen
References
328
This content downloaded from 168.176.5.118 on Sun, 02 Apr 2023 18:38:08 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Plastic
329
This content downloaded from 168.176.5.118 on Sun, 02 Apr 2023 18:38:08 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms