The document discusses the selection of bishops in Utrecht in the 12th century. It describes how the Investiture Controversy of 1122 allowed emperors to select bishops but required papal consecration. This led to competing factions vying for influence over episcopal appointments in Utrecht, risking violence. It also describes how local Frisian counts expanded their power and influence in the early 10th century by restoring the ruined abbey of Egmond, which became a major spiritual center.
The document discusses the selection of bishops in Utrecht in the 12th century. It describes how the Investiture Controversy of 1122 allowed emperors to select bishops but required papal consecration. This led to competing factions vying for influence over episcopal appointments in Utrecht, risking violence. It also describes how local Frisian counts expanded their power and influence in the early 10th century by restoring the ruined abbey of Egmond, which became a major spiritual center.
The document discusses the selection of bishops in Utrecht in the 12th century. It describes how the Investiture Controversy of 1122 allowed emperors to select bishops but required papal consecration. This led to competing factions vying for influence over episcopal appointments in Utrecht, risking violence. It also describes how local Frisian counts expanded their power and influence in the early 10th century by restoring the ruined abbey of Egmond, which became a major spiritual center.
international resolution of the so-called Investiture Controversy
in 1122, which allowed emperors to select bishops but only the pope to consecrate them. After that, it was Church authorities, the local canons and, of course, the pope himself who had the most decisive say. The canons of Utrecht, however, were sons of prominent families from the region, who came under heavy pres- sure from their kinfolk to make the selection of a bishop serve their own familial interests. Too many opposing parties, then, had a stake in the bishop’s seat for the transfer of authority to occur harmoniously or, as the reforms of 1122 intended, to place spiritual criteria first in the selection process. This development undermined the ability of both the emperor and the bishop to steer an autonomous course, and it would subject Utrecht, with its competing factions, to squabbling or violence over most new episcopal appointments. Local lords could and did contest Utrecht’s expansion from their fortified homes. Future powerhouses such as Brabant to the south and Guelders to the east would emerge as significant forces only in the course of the twelfth century, and only in the thir- teenth would Utrecht’s power be seriously challenged by others. The bishop’s earliest threat came from the west, from the Frisians led by Gerulf’s descendants. These counts modestly but stead- ily expanded their power from their base, where the Rhine then flowed into the sea, near present-day Valkenburg and Rijnsburg in South Holland. They re-established the ruined abbey near Egmond in the early tenth century, in time making it one of the most influential spiritual centers in the northern Netherlands, as well as the administrative heart of the counts. At the end of the tenth century, Count Dirck II donated to the St. Adelbert Abbey the Evangeliarium of Egmond, a richly illustrated book of the gospels that includes the first extant depictions of early medi- eval Dutch architecture and people. Until about 1200, Egmond was also the only place in the Netherlands where books were produced.
An Irish Precursor of Dante: A Study on the Vision of Heaven and Hell ascribed to the Eighth-century Irish Saint Adamnán, with Translation of the Irish Text
C. Dekker, H. Soly, J. H. Van Stuijvenberg, A. Th. Van Deursen, M. Müller, E. Witte, P. W. Klein, Alice C. Carter (Auth.) Acta Historiae Neerlandicae 8 - Studies On The History of The Netherlands