WETCH ANN S. MELGAR MRED SEPTEMBER 0, 0 ACTIVITY Quiz EDUC G02 - Inferential statistics A. Solve the given situation ucing the Stepwise Method 1 In a learning expenment , 3 groups of studentc made the following tumbers of conect recpongs in a series of 0 ¢rials Apety the analysis of variance 4o find out if the groups differed Significantly im their performance Use: @: .05 df= Ce-t)= 3-1 2 = Cn-1) - Ck-1) = (904) - (3-1) df= 2 and 27 = 19-2 = 27 : [croup A Group © Group _C Trials rx, Le % %F % %F ' g G4 7 49 i aC z G wH 7 44 1 44 3 lo 100 lo bo G He + to | 44 lo 100 1 44 5 tl (2 2 ad @ 36 G Is aE eq | 1 44 g 2 1 jo | 1 | 19 64 4 ' I 196 4q | g g G4 4 t iq 7 q Gla. 100 6 a6 lo to | 00 | [00 4 Io Sur EK Bye bs Lx,TFNS! EX, = 57 EX,'= 997 nz n= lo nys lo X94 TOs N25Saving by the Stepwise Method: 4. Prilem : Is there a signitcant diNerence in th 9 gions of chidents in a leaming experiment ? @ average scores of the 1. Hypotheses : Wy: There ig no Significant difference in the average sores of the 3 groups of Studenis 4 learning experiment . H: There is a significant lifference in the average scores of he 3 grou of ctudents in a learning experiment . Level of Significance * a: -& df= 2 and 27 DW. Statistios F-test are-way-analysis of variance computation . 2 cr Gut bred 2%) Cagtiosisr)® C56)" 655% _ 2 194 59 At Mtns 10+ lot lo 30) dp atwen tre WSS = Ex74 Bx," 4 Exy* - CF = C49# + USI 4 987) - 2, 184.53 = 2,402 - 2,184.59 BS = 197-47 2 BSS = Cx)", (2x), Br) - cr ul % % = C94)", Cos)", C57)? 2, 194.53 p lo lo = SBM 4 085 4 32 oy i686 to 1 0 > BBG 1002S + 3289 - 2,184.53 > 2,4 - 2,194.53 BS = 126.47 WSS = TSC - BSS = 299-47 126-47 Ws =Analysis of Variance Table Sources i Deore of Sum of Mean F-vaive Si a ene Freedom Squares Squats omewted Tabular Between Geups Ki 2 1% .47 69.24 1694 395 within Group CN-1)-CK-1) 2 a 4. Total We 9 297.47 V- Decision Rule: If the F computed value is geater than F-+abular value, reject Hy. M. Conclusion : Since the computed value of i¢.99 is qreater than the F- tabular value of 9.95 at as lovel of significance with 2 and 27 degrees of freedom, the null hypothesis. ic rejected in favor of the research hypothesis Which means that there is a significant ditference in the average scores of the 3 groups of students in a learning experiment. SCHEFFE's TEST Aw. B Given X= 44 X= ws Swe 44 a2 m+ Fe Gi 3)" Sw' Cn, tn) ny = 4-5)? +8 Coto cio\Co) = Ou? 4. C0) = = tat Ben 00 = it 0.82 = 147 F => A ows. C Given: X= 44 er Swi: bt 20 er rf, (G- i> SW? Cn, #75) Any > (44-54)? 4.1 Cot) X00) = (a7)? 410) bo = 13.69 mn Bows. C Given: ¥y = og %:57 Sw. $a m= ns? 0 Fs (-%)* Su! Cag 4, naNy = (ws ~5.9)? H1 Co10) CoxCioy = Gsy 4. C20) 10 * 2.04 2 (00 = 28.04 6 gerComparioor of the Awrage Saves of the 9 Cows of Students Between : CF os) are : wert ne A v5.8 oo G1 not significant Avs. C ees 6.1 Significant Bw.C R09 or significant The above table shows that there is a significant diffeence between group A and grup C , and group ® and grup C. However, Qmup A and group B have no significant differences in their average sores This implies that grup C has the least auerage scores in the Veamning experiment.oeeeneneeenmnmenemesiae ren ne ee es ETCH AUN S. MELGAR MAED CePNMIBES. Bae ; AcTWITY Quiz { EDUC G2 - Inferential Statistics A. GoWe tre given situation using the Stepwise Method 2. Below are the midterm (x) and final Cy) grades of the students Uce the Pearoon Prodct Moment Coefficient of Conelation / ) Midterm | Final Exam x y xy x x 8 93 6,084 ©, 889 o, 474 % 90 8,00 8, 100 8, (00 31 % 115A 9,095 $265 $3 — — |} «ae ] 1,295 9,055 80 9% 6,400 6, 989 640 85 & 7,25 144 1,480 ig ot 6, "oO 7,056 6,110 82 Eq G74 1, 36 1,052 90 90 loo 8,100 8 100 5 R 1.05 1744 1,480 9 vn 8,644 8,100 8,370 5 ® 1,05 41,744 1,480 VO y= 1,080 2 y'=G4 5H Zy*= 4,012 Zxy = 84,216 = 0 Y= ors Level of Significance @: 0% df: n-2 2 ie = 10 tos: .5760 (table value) Je there @ significant relationship between the midtem and the final examinations of 12 Studenic 1. Problem 1. Hypotheses to: There is no Significant relationship between the midtem and the final cxaminationg of (2 Students H,: There ic @Q cignificant relationship between the midterm aad the fina! examinations of 12 Studentsabyy - Ex2y [ndF=CxF7 Cody? -Gy)*] = __n.(99,26)- (1,08) Croco) Aine 5) ~ (1,018)47 Cte(42, 02) Ca)" 1,070, 54 ~ 1,068, 0 palace Pa ee AN Oe T1099, 080 1,08 , 324] [, B#, I 1, 02,600, = hon V02, 766] C1, 644) 1,692 V4s0, ay 2,128 58 eee eae i Deckion Rule: If the computed ¢ value is greater than the value, reject Ho Condusion [Implication Gince the computed vdiue aw which is .795 is greater than the tabular value Of 5% at -0c leiel of significance, dress of freedom, the ull hypotecis is disconfirmed in Fawr of the research hypothecic- This meanc that there is @ significant relationship between the miciem grades of students and the final examination FA implies that the higher the mide grades , the higher alg are the final grades because the value of r is postive - Likewise the lower the midiem grades the lower also are the final grades. Coefficient of Determnation cp = ety tO ‘b 175) x 0° 920 x 100 ‘lo @ = 65.2% Tis G.2%o indicates ‘hat the final examination grade depends on the midtém grades. Thus, the final grade is influenced by the midterm gradeWETCH) AKN S. MELGAR Actwity Quiz EDUC G02 - Inferential Statistics 3. A certain mizing macting is supposed to mix peas, hazdnuic , cacheus , and pli mic in the eatio of 5:4:5:9.. zi Nuis Ratio Observed Expected Peanuic 5 240 200 Hazelnuts 4 140 [eo Cashews 3 (20 (20 Pili. nuts 3 oo [20 TOTAL Is (oo oo Lev of Significance a: 0 df= h- y¥05- 7.815 (table value) 1. Problem: Is there q significant differeice between the observed C actual) experiment and the expeded Ctheory) frequenaes? TL. Aypotnesis Frequencies A, : There i¢ @ significant difference betwee the obseved and the expected Frequencies: U. Level Ff Sgnificance Q= 05 df= h- = As 2 ' 1 x“a = 7-815 tabular value Hy + There is no significant difference betueen the cbseved and the expededW. Statistic * 00 715 = 40 For eected fiequencies multiply 40%5 = 200 4ox4= 10 40%% = (20 40x9 = [20 x72 5 (o-e)* E = (pmo)! , (Ho-t0), (20 -0)*, Coo -120)* 200 lo [20 120 2 > fer pce Cay , Loy, (-29)* (20 Ro > 100 + 400 4 0 4 400 200 Ico ti te !20 = 8 £26 +0 + 3.393 Ps 1g 839 ee. V. Decision Rule: If the chi- square computed value is greater than the chi- Square jabular value, rejed Ho Conclusion = Since , he chi- Squdre Computed value of 19.899 1s greater than the chi-square fabular value of 7.815 a} .os level of significance with 9 degrees of freedom , the null hypothesis is rejeded in favor of the research hypothesic which means that there is @ significant difference between the observed and the expecled frequencies \4