Professional Documents
Culture Documents
-
Marissa, Angelica, Jena, Arriana, Luis,
Brenda, Sade, Jen
● Abstract/ introduction
Latina/o Bicultural and bilingual women who reside and have been educated in the U.S.
Women from Mexican Parents or descent that have generally been raised in the Southwest who
Chicana are politically, socially and culturally conscious. Have pride in membership to a strong and
cohesive political and intellectual academic community. People of mexican origin, whether born
in the U.S. or Mexico
Hispanic Mostly used by the U.S. Census to identify individuals of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central or
South American, or some other Hispanic origin of any race
Academic Defined by Frier’s concept of prescription which is the imposition of the oppressor’s choices over
Socialization those of the oppressed for purposes of transforming the consciousness of the oppressed
Research Purpose
Examine Focus
Examine how the academic socialization influences Focus on the opportunities and challenges that can
the success or failure of Latina doctorate students. be presented mixing academic and Latina culture to
understand Latinas views on their
underrepresentation at the doctoral level.
Inquiry Explore
Inquire on the relationships and conflicts existing for Explore how Latina doctorates conceptualize their
Latinas. identities at their institutions and how ethnicity,
gender, and class affect their lives and survival at
institutions in higher education.
Research Question
Characteristics Challenges
● Attending an Integrated K-12 ● Poor K-12 education
● Support from family and partners ● Lack of family support
● Strong mothers as role models ● Financial challenges
● Having mentors ● Discrimination
● Being grounded in cultural background and ● Cultural tension and Isolation
identity ● Perceptions of hostile academic
● Rejecting messages about academic environments
unworthiness ● Lack of mentors
● Low expectations from professors
Theoretical Framework
Methods
●
● Thirteen 1 - 2 hour interviews semi structured interviews were
conducted with Latina doctoral students attending mostly public
research institutions in the U.S. who have been in the program for 3+
years
● Asked open-ended questions related to their experiences and
interpretation of the academic environment
● Rapport was established with the women beforehand
● The research sites included four national conferences—Gathering at the
River: Women of Color in the Arizona Academy, National Association of
Chicana and Chicano Studies, American Educational Research
Association, and the Association for the Study of Higher Education
11
Description of Interviewees
Participants Pathway to doctoral K-12 Experience State Origin Parents’ Home Language Parents’ Origin
13 Latina 5 traditional paths 4 attended mostly 3 born and raised in 6 - only Spanish 11 parents were of
Doctoral Latino schools California Mexican descent
Students
No single 5 non-traditional path 2 attended mostly 4 in Arizona 2 - bilingual (Spanish and 1 set of parents were
parents White schools English) mixed
3 started at a CC 2 attended mostly 3 in Texas 5 did not say 1 set of parents were
racially integrated from Central America
schools
—Dr. Gonzalez
I had to Protect ME
Admitted with walls up
Negative Experiences and
Challenges
Poor Preparation in Set Tone for Future
K-12 Education
Cultural Isolation Cultural Integration
❏ Importance of Identity
❏ Fitting the mold
❏ Networks of Resistance
❏ Adjusting & Creating Space
How has academic
socialization affected where
you are now?
Relationships to Resistance
Successful Resistance Unsuccessful Resistance
“You cannot avoid being changed by the
doctorate process, even if you try to
resist the academic socialization to the
fullest extend”
♡ Look inside the problem, so the policymakers can make the change
♡ State and National funding need to be used to study effective models
of institutional change
♡ Academic Socialization (“institutional discrimination has become less
overt and more covert”)
Discussion and Implications
● There is a lack of representation among Latina Doctoral students who are studied
○ Focused on those in the Social Sciences and fails to acknowledge those in the
physical & life sciences
● There were gender differences between the researchers and interviewees
○ Men researchers will have a male perspective on things and can’t really resonate
with participants.
● Naturally there is an over-reliance on the self-reporting of experience
○ Trusting the participant excessively can possible lead to one getting false data.
○ Participants telling us what we want to hear rather than the truth
Thanks!
● González, J. C. (2006). Academic socialization experiences of
Latina doctoral students: A qualitative understanding of support
systems that aid and challenges that hinder the process. Journal
of Hispanic Higher Education, 5(4), 347-365.
● Thank you Pod 6, Sade for sharing Slidesgo and Kat for the table
template we used as inspiration for the description of interviewees