Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Name 2
Flying Colors Inside the Closet: A Study for Gender-Oriented Students in Christian Schools
CHAPTER 1
This chapter includes the introduction, statement of the problem, significance of the study, scope and
I. Introduction
According to Nelson Mandela, “To deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity.”
LGBTQIAA+ Community has become very know in this generation though the term homosexuality started
back in the 19th Century. It was first used as LGB to replace the term gay, but was later on revised to LGBT
in the 1990s. Since then, many have been beside and against these people. Those who are part of the
We can easily respond to these people's circumstances in knowing their past and views. This research
focuses in particular on gender-oriented students studying at a Christian school. The researchers believe that
schools should be a safe place for students, regardless of gender. They deserve no prejudice, abuse or
bullying. Because bullying is a common problem for students, it often results in low self esteem, depression
and worse mental illnesses that can lead to suicide. Although everyone has a different point of view on
bullying, it should still not discriminate or make the student look down on themselves.
These people also have rights that they should acknowledge, but since Christian schools also have their
own policies, it is still an argument on whose rights should be acknowledged and accepted.
known as gays.
This study focuses on the effects of being a gender-oriented student in a Christian school. It aims to
3. What actions does the school do towards them and what do students feel about it?
The research seeks to highlight and explain the rights of a gender-oriented student in a Christian school
because in most students life bullying is a major problem. The work will also help to know what behaviors
these students are doing or how the school deals with them.
This study focused on the effects of being a gender-oriented student in a Christian school during the
school year 2019-2020. The respondents of the study are The study's respondents are restricted to few only
The results of this study is only applicable to the respondents and for the year of the study only. This
study only focuses on the views, interaction, and treatment of heterosexuals to the homosexuals.
This study focuses on the effects of the policies and beliefs of Christian schools towards the students
who are part of the LGBTQIAA+ community. This exposes how people differ in interacting with these
GRADE AND SECTION 2
students, it can or may actually result to discrimination and bullying. Since some people may have the same
faith as the school, they may probably hate the person who goes against school beliefs. Homosexuality may
be considered to be a sin, heterosexuals agree that homosexuality shouldn't be found in society. Somehow
I. Introduction
This study will be focusing on gender-oriented students inside Christian schools. Given that
discrimination and harassment are a major problem in schools, the researchers seek to help gender-oriented
students address factors that make them feel unwelcome and unsafe in the culture in which they reside.The
goal is also to highlight the rights of a gender-oriented student in particular within the school.
This chapter presents the background and justification for the researchers ' study. This provides
additional knowledge and other research with any incoherence and inconsistencies.
Michael Foucault, a 20th-century French Philosopher who strongly influenced the queer theory,
believes that sexuality is socially constructed. There is no cross-sexuality that is simply given, not by
genes or any natural aspect (Callis, 2011). Cultural understandings are the one that drives and urges a
person into homosexuality. Globalization, however, is changing the nature of sexual identities,
especially among those who engage in same-sex relations. The West’s movement on gay rights had
strongly influenced Asians with same-sex sexuality beliefs. Most other Asian countries today have gay
and lesbian groups. In 1993, activists formed Progay Philippines that organized Asia’s first gay pride
Homophobia refers to a fear or hatred of homosexuality and gays and lesbians in general. It
emphasizes the “phobia” aspect that shows extreme or irrational aversion to gays and lesbians. Usually,
those who favor homosexuals use the term, since from their point of view there is nothing wrong with
the homosexuality and thus fear of it is irrational. Though most of those who show hatred or fear believe
that their dislike and loath are reasonable and do not count as a phobia (Anderson, 2016). Homophobes
typically rely on stereotypes. For instance, they portray gay men as womanish and lesbians as mannish.
and result of hedonism or some other grave personal failing. They also argue that homosexuality is a
threat to morality, the family, and community. Yet since homosexuality does not exist by nature, it can
be cured and Baptists and other similar groups help finance the reparative therapy movement (Pickett,
2011). Reparative therapy movement or now know as conversion therapy, practices that attempt to
change their sexual orientation or gender identity (Movement Advancement Project). Early Christian
theologians harshly denounced same-sex relations and any type of sex as immoral. Christianity’s rise in
influence resulted in a series of anti-sodomy laws, law that defines sexual acts as crimes. There is a
broad variety of view today within Christianity on the morality of same-sex relations. In 1986, Cardinal
Joseph Ratzinger published “The Pastoral Care of Homosexual Persons.” Ratzinger, who later became
Pope Benedict, argued that homosexuality is an innate condition and therefore since it is not chosen, it is
not a sin. Homosexual sex, however, is sinful and can never be more, even in the context of loving
Many Filipino LGBTs still continue to experience stigma, prejudice, and discrimination. (Psychological
Association of the Philippines, PAP, 2011). It has also been seen that anti-gay prejudice is alive among
Filipinos. In the analysis conducted by Manalastas, a nationally representative survey found that 1 out of 4
Filipinos would reject gay people as neighbors and that 28% of Filipino adults consider being gay as
"unacceptable." The views regarding homosexuality in the Philippines are somewhat attributed to the
dominant culture of heterosexuality and religious teachings. Cultural norms are built around the dominant
culture of heterosexuality defining same-sex relationships as deviant and immoral while defining man-
In the Philippines, the terms “tomboy” and “bakla” describes lesbian women and gay men, and are often
used synonymously to label transgender people. Findings indicate that religion, culture, and family
expectations influenced one’s ability to accept one’s sexuality and that lesbian and gay Filipinos experience
several psychological stressors as a result of balancing their multiple identities (Nadal, 2013). Participants
Though Philippines is considered as a gay-friendly country, it is reported that Filipino Lesbian, Gay,
Transgender and Bisexual (LGBT) students are struggling with bullying and discrimination from families,
communities and schools (Poudel, 2018). The main barriers of the organization are the lack of legal
protection, mental health issues and discrimination at different places were big challenges to Filipino LGBT
students (Tang, 2018). The religion was also not supportive towards LGBT and showed powerful influence
on many aspects, including education and politics. To address these issues, educating and sensitizing more
people, and engaging LGBT individuals into advocacy were mostly expected. It is recommended to the
government to act positively to pass the ‘anti-discrimination bill’ that was already prepared.
Methodology
As stated in the title, this chapter contains the research paper's methodology. The researchers
explain in more depth the research method, data collection methods, sample selection, the research process,
I. Participants
The respondents expected for the study were 60 but we had voluntary respondents who were either
gender-oriented or gender-confused students because of privacy concerns and since they were in a Christian
The respondents were chosen with the proper permission from those who have already come out and
from their peers. They were asked if they were willing to answer the questionnaire forms in advance.
II. Instruments
The researchers collect data on the interactions of selected gender-orientated students with their
families, their peers and with their schools through questionnaires that include 50 qualitative questions.
The researchers at the (SCHOOL NAME) carried out this study. The respondents were chosen from the
Department of Junior and High Schools. The researchers then collected, analyzed, summarized and
Due to lack of time and school policy prejudices, the researchers had limited access to the few
respondents. There is also a lack of prior research on this subject, so the researchers have produced a
completely new study. Since the data was in form of questionnaires, it is only a self-reported data and
researchers can rely on only the answers provided by the survey respondents.
GRADE AND SECTION 7
Chapter 4
The findings and analysis of qualitative questionnaires are represented as quantitative in this chapter in
6%
YES
NO
94%
The figure shows that nine out of 10 or 94% of students who have been questioned have doubts about
their gender before confirming their sexual preference and only 6% are already certain. These data apply
19%
GAYS
LESBIANS
19% 56%
BOTH
NEITHER
6%
Figure 2. Acceptance of gays or lesbians in society, based on the answers of the respondents.
31%
YES
NO
69%
This figure revealed that 69% of these sex-oriented students are subject to criticism by others, whilst the
6%
50% YES
NO
44%
I DON’T KNOW
This figure shows that one-half of the respondents attempted to appear as gender oriented people, but 44%
10%
40%
ASHAMED
FEAR OF JUDGEMENTS
RELIGIOUS ENVI-
RONMENT
50%
This figure shows that prejudice, uncertainty, and being in a religious school prohibit them from expressing
their true gender identity.
8% 11%
YES
NO
MAYBE
81%
Figure 6. The possibility of an environment to change the preference of a person in terms of gender.
This figure shows that 81% of the students assume that a person can have differences in gender preferences
because of the environment they are in.
44%
YES
56% NO
This figure shows that while 56% may believe gender-oriented students are treated properly in Christian
The research conducted is about the effects of being a gender-oriented student in Christian school. It
reveals how the policies and different viewpoints impact these students ' lives. It allows the students to
Summary
This research was conducted with the goal of supporting gender-oriented students with their rights
within the Christian School and data were collected for this study using respondents who were identified as
gender-oriented students. This study applies only for the year of the study, S.Y. 2019-2020. Through a
qualitative survey, the data were collected, and subsequently analyzed as quantitative data.
Conclusions
i. Most of the respondents are afraid to express themselves because of the criticism they
may get from others. They isolate their true self and just pretend not to be judged.
ii. Friends, family, social media and including their own are common factors that
also be a factor for a person to be gender-oriented. Social media has also been seen as a
iii. Most respondents believe that, because they are in a Christian School, it is easier to
hide their gender identity than to reveal it to others to escape judgments and criticism.
Since most Christians view homosexuality as a sin, they avoid any conflicts in this
matter.
iv. Christian schools do not condemn these students but at the same time they do not
support them. They encourage them to change their views to the fullest extent possible.
Homosexuality does not contravene the policies of school but is contrary to school
beliefs, which is why schools try to influence students to change their identity.
judge or condemn others, we can't blame them because we vary in our own way of
thinking.
Recommendations
We suggest for a comparative study on the impact of being homosexual in Christian and non-
Christian schools.
Teachers should stop giving homosexuals the wrong image and find them immoral. They should
Students should not judge their schoolmates simply because they vary from one another in
gender. Students should be the first to speak out to stand up for their schoolmates and promote
equality.
We would like to encourage these gender-oriented students to be brave and to be proud of who
they are. They should be aware that they are allowed to express themselves if that’s what makes
them comfortable and happy. They can stand up for themselves if they think that their rights are
being violated. They shouldn’t let the views of others to limit them. They should be able to
choose whatever gender they want and love whoever they want to.
Gender equality is a human fight and not a female fight. Everyone deserve the same respect and
love. We all deserve equal chances to be accepted without prejudices by society. Equal treatment
Foreign
Callis, April S. (2010). Playing with Butler and Foucault: Bisexuality and Queer Theory, Journal of
Bisexuality.
Local
Kiely, Bartholomew. The Pastoral Care of Homosexual Persons: A Psychological Note, The Cathedral
Foundation.
Lanic, Et Al. (2015). Self-Stigma, Self-Concept Clarity, and Mental Health Status of Filipino LGBT
Individuals.
www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-415109091/self-stigma-self-concept-clarity-and-mental-health
Nadal & Corpus (2013). “Tomboys” and “baklas”: Experiences of lesbian and gay Filipino Americans.
Poudel & Tang (2018). Exploring challenges and problems faced by LGBT students in Philippines: