Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:236839 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service
information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit
www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of
more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online
products and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics
(COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.
Introduction
Loyalty Loyalty is thought to be an important concept for marketing practitioners for
a number of reasons, including:
(1) All profit driven firms are interested in selling to achieve maximum
profit levels. There is a popular belief that customers who exhibit loyalty
reduce the marketing costs of doing business (Uncles and Laurent,
1997). This could occur for a number of reasons:
. Loyalty reduces the need to incur customer acquisition costs
(Reichheld, 1996), which is particularly salient in service markets.
Reichheld (1993) cites a credit card example where in the first year
acquisition costs for a new customer involved credit evaluation, card
issuance and other expenses of setting up a new account on the data
processing system. If the cardholder stays for a second year, profits
improve significantly because account set-up costs are not incurred
in the second year. It is often considerably less costly to keep
existing customers happy and reduce the reasons to change (Aaker,
1992).
. Positive word of mouth, brought about by loyalty, is seen as just one
possible mechanism for enabling a firm to save on marketing costs
(Jones and Sasser, 1995; Aaker, 1991; Arnold, 1992).
. Loyal customers are typically less price sensitive (Reichheld, 1996).
(2) Brand extension, an increasingly preferred vehicle for new product
launches is an attempt, in part, to exploit the loyalty to the parent brand
and supposedly lower the risks of new product failure.
JOURNAL OF SERVICES MARKETING, VOL. 15 NO. 7 2001, pp. 529-546, # MCB UNIVERSITY PRESS, 0887-6045 529
(3) Loyalty rates have been shown to increase with market share, and market
share, in turn, has been shown to be associated with higher rates of return
on investment (Buzzell et al., 1975; Buzzell and Gale, 1987).
Loyalty provides fewer reasons for consumers to engage in extended
information search[1] among alternatives (Uncles et al., 1998). Solomon
(1994) also indicates that purchase decisions based on loyalty may become
simplified and even habitual in nature and, so supports the assertion that this
may be a result of satisfaction with the current brand(s). For example, there
is little point in considering alternatives when a customer is satisfied with the
performance of a product.
There is little dispute that the concept of brand loyalty is important. The
measurement of brand loyalty has been of enduring concern to both
academics and marketing practitioners (Uncles, 1998). The literature
contains a multitude of different measures, yet there have been few attempts
to consolidate these measures.
Loyalty measures As far as the authors are aware, the relationship between different brand
Downloaded by WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE At 04:51 31 January 2016 (PT)
loyalty measures has not been explored in the same papers and across
industries. The marketing literature has acknowledged that there is a need for
loyalty research to relate different loyalty measures to each other, and to use
more than one measure in the same project. For this reason, our research
focuses on exploring the relationship between a number of loyalty measures
(detailed in following sections) in two service markets and one repeat-
purchase market.
More specifically, this paper is designed to address the following
hypotheses:
H1. Attitude toward the act, brand preference, attitude toward the brand,
verbal probability, share of category requirements, brand allegiance,
price elasticity and price until switching, are all measures of brand
loyalty in a service market.
H2. Attitude toward the act, brand preference, attitude toward the brand,
verbal probability, share of category requirements, brand allegiance,
price elasticity and price until switching, are measures of brand loyalty
in both service and repeat-purchase markets.
Performance The paper explores the performance of loyalty measures in the
telecommunications market, the credit card market and fuel market. The first
section of this paper will commence by defining service markets and by
discussing both the concepts and measures of brand loyalty. The second
section of this paper will present the brand loyalty measures used and the
methodology followed by the results and discussion. The paper will conclude
with limitations and recommendations for future research.
Loyalty measures
Key measures Table I categorizes some key measures that have been proposed in the
loyalty literature as either attitudinal or behavioral. This is by no means an
exhaustive summary of loyalty measures. Jacoby and Chestnut's (1978)
review of the loyalty literature revealed over 80 loyalty measures proposed
by various researchers. Each measure analyzed in this paper has been widely
used in marketing practice in Australia and New Zealand.
The results of this study should provide further support to determine whether
each measure captures the proposed loyalty concept. For example, can share of
category be considered a suitable indicator for the concept of behavioral loyalty?
Methodology
In this paper survey data were analyzed across three industries and two
geographical markets in Australia and New Zealand. The exact details of
each market will not be identified as some data were collected in commercial
confidence. The data sets are summarized in Table II.
Telecommunications study
The data collected in the telecommunications market were sponsored by a
commercial organisation. Data were collected at the end of 1997 in Australia
using customer lists from the sponsoring organisation. The data for this study
were collected via telephone using Interviewer Quality Control Australia
(IQCA) accredited telephone-interviewers and involved a total of 1,966
respondents. This study was conducted in a business-to-business market and
the questionnaire was administered to key telecommunication decision-
makers in each organisation surveyed. The survey was administered to
businesses of all sizes. The survey covered topics including awareness,
Downloaded by WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE At 04:51 31 January 2016 (PT)
period
Attitudinal loyalty . Whether attitudinal loyalty measures are capturing attitudinal loyalty,
e.g. attitudinal loyalty measures are more highly correlated with other
attitudinal loyalty measures than they are with behavioral measures.
. Whether behavioral loyalty measures are capturing behavioral loyalty
e.g. behavioral loyalty measures are more highly correlated with other
behavioral loyalty measures than they are with attitudinal loyalty measures.
The Spearman rank-correlation procedure was used to study the association
between loyalty measures, which is a non-parametric method (see Berensen
and Levine, 1986 for discussion of this technique) as some attitudinal data
were ordinal. To confirm the results of the correlation analysis, factor analysis
Results
Performance of brand loyalty measures in service markets
Table IV presents the aggregate descriptive statistics with standard
deviations in brackets for the telecommunications market. Results have been
Downloaded by WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE At 04:51 31 January 2016 (PT)
Attitude
toward Verbal Price until Share of
act Attitude probability switching Elasticity category Preference Allegiance
Attitude
toward act 1.0
Attitude 0.5 1.0
Verbal
probability 0.7* 0.8* 1.0
Price until
switching 0.7* 0.3 0.5 1.0
Elasticity ± 0.3 0.4 ± 0.6 0.0 1.0
Share of
category 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.1 1.0
Preference 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.1 1.0* 1.0
Allegiance 0.5 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.1 1.0* 1.0* 1.0
Note: * Significant at the p < 0.05 level
. The attitude toward the brand measure indicates little difference between
CC1-5. That is, attitude is relatively consistent across the five credit card
brands. The attitude toward the brand measure does not move with the
share of category measure (and hence market share).
. The share of category measure indicates that CC1, CC2 and CC3 have an
Downloaded by WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE At 04:51 31 January 2016 (PT)
company outlet.
. The share of category measure indicates that customers spent almost 30
per cent of their total fuel expenditure with F1 and F2.
. The brand preference measure indicates that more than 25 per cent of
customers prefer both, F1 and F3.
. Once again, brand preference reflects share of category requirements.
Other comments:
. In terms of rank F1 has the highest loyalty according to the share of
category requirements, and brand preference measures.
. F3 has the highest loyalty according to the price until switching measure.
. According to the verbal probability measure customers are less loyal in
the fuel market than in the service markets.
Table X presents the aggregate (brand level) correlation statistics for the fuel
market.
Verbal probability Once again, the verbal probability measure is strongly and positively
associated with the share of category requirement measure.
To confirm the results of the correlation analysis, factor analysis was carried
out on the four brand loyalty measures collected in the fuel market. The
factor loadings are displayed in Table XI.
A factor analysis revealed two factors explaining 79 per cent of the variance,
which can be considered a satisfactory solution. Once again, only a factor
loading of 0.8 or above was deemed significant due to the small sample size.
Brand preference, share of category requirements and verbal probability load
Discussion
This section summarises key findings from the analysis and in turn will
address each of the two hypotheses.
Managerial implications
Research findings These research findings will assist managers in interpreting the meaning of
empirical studies now that specific measures can be more clearly associated
with concepts. Empirical analysis indicates that there are at least three
concepts of loyalty that can be used to capture loyalty. The use of these
alternate loyalty concepts should provide additional explanatory potential for
both practitioners and researchers in distinguishing between types and
Downloaded by WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE At 04:51 31 January 2016 (PT)
Notes
1. Information search is the process in which the customer surveys his or her environment
for appropiate data to make purchasing decisions (Solomon, 1994).
2. This can be considered a satisfactory solution as it accounts for 79 per cent of the total
variance (see Hair et al., 1995 for further discussion).
References
Aaker, D.A. (1991), ``Are brand equity investments really worthwhile?'', Admap, pp. 14-17.
Aaker, D. (1992), Strategic Market Management, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior,
Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Arnold, D. (1992), The Handbook of Brand Management, The Economist Books, Reading,
Downloaded by WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE At 04:51 31 January 2016 (PT)
MA.
Berensen, M.L. and Levine, D.M. (1986), Basic Business Statistics: Concepts and
Applications, Prentice-Hall, Englewoods Cliffs, NJ.
Brown, G. (1985), ``Tracking studies and sales effects: a UK perspective'', Journal of
Advertising Research, Vol. 25, pp. 52-64.
Buzzell, R.D. and Gale, B.T. (1987), The PIMS Principles, The Free Press, New York, NY.
Buzzell, R.D., Gale, B.T. and Sultan, R.G.M. (1975), ``Market share ± a key to profitability'',
Harvard Business Review, Vol. 53, pp. 97-106.
Croucher, J.S. and Oliver, E. (1993), Statistics: A Modern Introduction for Business and
Management, McGraw Hill Book Company Australia, Roseville.
Cunningham, R.M. (1956), ``Brand loyalty ± what, where, how much?'', Harvard Business
Review, Vol. 34, pp. 116-28.
Dall'Olmo Riley, F., Ehrenberg, A.S.C., Castleberry, S.B., Barwise, T.P. and Barnard, N.R.
(1997), ``The variability of attitudinal repeat-rates'', International Journal of Research in
Marketing, Vol. 14, pp. 437-50.
Danenberg, N. and Sharp, B. (1996), in Riquier, C. and Sharp, B. (Eds) Southern Marketing ±
Theory and Applications, Proceedings of the Australian Marketing Educators'
Conference, Vol. 2, Marketing Science Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide,
p. 704.
East, R. (1997), Consumer Behavior: Advances and Applications in Marketing, Prentice-Hall,
London.
Ehrenberg, A.S.C. (1988), Repeat Buying Facts, Theory and Applications, Oxford University
Press, New York, NY.
Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to
Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading, MA.
Guest, L. (1944), ``A study of brand loyalty'', Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 28, pp. 16-27.
Guest, L. (1955), ``Brand loyalty ± twelve years later'', Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 39,
pp. 405-8.
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1995), Multivariate Data Analysis,
Prentice-Hall International, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Hawkes, P. (1994), ``Building brand loyalty and commitment'', The Journal of Brand
Management, Vol. 1, pp. 337-47.
Heeler, R.M. and Ray, M.L. (1972), ``Measure validation in marketing'', Journal of Marketing
Research, Vol. 9, pp. 361-70.
Jacoby, J. and Chestnut, R. (1978), Brand Loyalty: Measurement and Management, John
Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
Javalgi, R.G. and Moberg, C.R. (1997), ``Service loyalty: implications for service providers'',
The Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 11, pp. 165-79.
&
perceived risk increases, so, too, does the likelihood of loyalty to one brand.
1. Le Chi Cong. 2016. A formative model of the relationship between destination quality, tourist satisfaction and intentional loyalty:
An empirical test in Vietnam. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 26, 50-62. [CrossRef]
2. Orie Berezan, Michelle Yoo, Natasa Christodoulidou. 2016. The impact of communication channels on communication style
and information quality for hotel loyalty programs. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology 7:1, 100-116. [Abstract] [Full
Text] [PDF]
3. Sanjay Pulligadda, Frank R Kardes, Maria L Cronley. 2015. Positive affectivity as a predictor of consumers’ propensity to be brand
loyal. Journal of Brand Management . [CrossRef]
4. Orie Berezan, Carola Raab, Anjala S. Krishen, Curtis Love. 2015. Loyalty Runs Deeper than Thread Count: An Exploratory
Study of Gay Guest Preferences and Hotelier Perceptions. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 32, 1034-1050. [CrossRef]
5. Christer Strandberg, Olof Wahlberg, Peter Öhman. 2015. Effects of commitment on intentional loyalty at the person-to-person
and person-to-firm levels. Journal of Financial Services Marketing 20, 191-207. [CrossRef]
6. Naehyun (Paul) Jin, Ben Goh, Lynn Huffman, Jingxue Jessica Yuan. 2015. Predictors and Outcomes of Perceived Image of
Restaurant Innovativeness in Fine-Dining Restaurants. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management 24, 457-485. [CrossRef]
Downloaded by WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE At 04:51 31 January 2016 (PT)
7. Bikash Ranjan Debata, Bhaswati Patnaik, Siba Sankar Mahapatra, Kumar Sree. 2015. Interrelations of service quality and service
loyalty dimensions in medical tourism. Benchmarking: An International Journal 22:1, 18-55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
8. 2014. Consumer Perceived Value and Brand Loyalty. International Journal of Customer Relationship Marketing and Management
3:10.4018/IJCRMM.20121001, 1-15. [CrossRef]
9. Betül Çal, Richard Adams. 2014. The Effect of Hedonistic and Utilitarian Consumer Behavior on Brand Equity: Turkey – UK
Comparison on Coca Cola. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 150, 475-484. [CrossRef]
10. Farzana Quoquab, Norjaya Mohd. Yasin, Rozhan Abu Dardak. 2014. A qualitative inquiry of multi-brand loyalty. Asia Pacific
Journal of Marketing and Logistics 26:2, 250-271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
11. Monireh Salehnia, Maryam Saki, Alireza Eshaghi, Nafiseh SalehniaA model of E-Loyalty and word-of-mouth based on e-trust
in E-banking services (case study: Mellat Bank) 1-7. [CrossRef]
12. Azin Mostajer Haghighi, Thomas Baum, Farhad Shafti. 2014. Dimensions of customer loyalty in hospitality micro-enterprises.
The Service Industries Journal 34, 251-273. [CrossRef]
13. Leonardo A.N. Dioko, Siu-Ian (Amy) So, Rich Harrill. 2013. Hotel category switching behavior—Evidence of mobility, stasis or
loyalty. International Journal of Hospitality Management 34, 234-244. [CrossRef]
14. Hotniar Siringoringo, Eko Sri Margianti, Anacostia Kowanda, Trini Saptariani. 2013. Shopping Behavior of Indonesian Consumer
Towards Imported Products. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 81, 411-415. [CrossRef]
15. Wei-Tsong Wang, Shih-Yu Cheng, Lin-Yo Huang. 2013. Technology-Based Service Encounters Using Self-Service Technologies
in the Healthcare Industry. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 29, 139-155. [CrossRef]
16. Sanjay Puligadda, William T. Ross, Jinjie Chen, Elizabeth Howlett. 2012. When loyalties clash purchase behavior when a preferred
brand is stocked out: The tradeoff between brand and store loyalty. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 19, 570-577.
[CrossRef]
17. Anna Kuikka, Tommi Laukkanen. 2012. Brand loyalty and the role of hedonic value. Journal of Product & Brand Management
21:7, 529-537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
18. Norm O'Reilly, Steven Ayer, Ann Pegoraro, Bridget Leonard, Sharyn Rundle-Thiele. 2012. Toward an Understanding of
Donor Loyalty: Demographics, Personality, Persuasion, and Revenue. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 24, 65-81.
[CrossRef]
19. Wei‐Tsong Wang, Zu‐Hao Wei. 2011. Knowledge sharing in wiki communities: an empirical study. Online Information Review
35:5, 799-820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
20. Oriol Iglesias, Jatinder J. Singh, Mònica Casabayó. 2011. Key changes and challenges for brands in an uncertain environment.
Journal of Product & Brand Management 20:6, 436-439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
21. Ahmed Alamro, Jennifer Rowley. 2011. Antecedents of brand preference for mobile telecommunications services. Journal of
Product & Brand Management 20:6, 475-486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
22. Ahmed Rageh Ismail. 2011. Experience Marketing: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Relationship Marketing 10, 167-201.
[CrossRef]
23. José Ángel López Sánchez, María Leticia Santos Vijande, Juan Antonio Trespalacios Gutiérrez. 2011. The effects of manufacturer's
organizational learning on distributor satisfaction and loyalty in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management 40, 624-635.
[CrossRef]
24. Carl Marcus Wallenburg, Peter Lukassen. 2011. Proactive improvement of logistics service providers as driver of customer loyalty.
European Journal of Marketing 45:3, 438-454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
25. Jason Minser, Valerie Webb. 2010. Quantifying the Benefits. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research
Board 2144, 111-120. [CrossRef]
26. Tim Oliver Brexendorf, Silke Mühlmeier, Torsten Tomczak, Martin Eisend. 2010. The impact of sales encounters on brand
loyalty. Journal of Business Research 63, 1148-1155. [CrossRef]
27. Patrick Vesel, Vesna Zabkar. 2010. Relationship quality evaluation in retailers' relationships with consumers. European Journal of
Marketing 44:9/10, 1334-1365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
28. Carl Marcus Wallenburg, David L. Cahill, Thomas J. Goldsby, A. Michael Knemeyer. 2010. Logistics outsourcing performance
and loyalty behavior. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 40:7, 579-602. [Abstract] [Full Text]
[PDF]
29. Yung‐Shen Yen. 2010. Can perceived risks affect the relationship of switching costs and customer loyalty in e‐commerce?. Internet
Downloaded by WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE At 04:51 31 January 2016 (PT)