Professional Documents
Culture Documents
couN~v-~tion
a a mcycling
ELSEVIER Resources, Conservationand Recycling21 (1997) 129-143
Received 20 December 1996; received in revised form 10 July 1997; accepted 27 July 1997
Abstract
Three organic soil conditioners were tested in 14 different Malus domestica orchards:
cattle manure, SB compost (from sewage sludge and poplar barks) and MSW compost
(from municipal solid waste not source separated). These materials differed notably in their
heavy metal content: the SB compost contained greater amounts of Zn, Cu and Pb than
did the cattle manure, while the MSW compost had higher concentrations of all the metals
studied. For 6 years the Zn, Cu, Ni, Pb, Cd and Cr content were monitored in the
soil--both in 'total' and EDTA extractable f o r m - - a n d in leaves and fruits. The resulting
data demonstrate that the SB compost did not cause any significant increase in heavy metal
levels in soil and plants; this compost can thus be used to fertilise the soil with no danger
in the short/medium term either to the environment or to crops. In contrast, the experi-
ment clearly demonstrates that the MSW compost, used over a 6 year period, increased
concentrations of Zn, Cu, Ni, Pb, Cd and Cr in the soil--both in 'total' and EDTA
extractable f o r m - - a n d in the case of Pb and Cd also in the vegetation and the fruits.
© 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.
1. Introduction
Compost obtained from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and from
other selected waste biomasses can sometimes be used effectively as an organic
fertiliser on agricultural soil. The high content of stabilised organic matter and the
presence of nutrients of a good quality compost are a guarantee of agronomic
advantages; at the same time, the use of compost makes the reuse of organic wastes
possible and has numerous advantages [1,2].
An increase in soil organic matter and nutrient availability after compost
application has been observed by many [3-5]. The use of compost is also beneficial
for the soil's physical properties: increased porosity, structural stability, available
water content and reduction of erosion have been noted [6-9].
The phytonutritive capacity of compost has often been demonstrated to be
analogous to that of manure; the same level of productivity, both quantitatively
and qualitatively, can be maintained by replacing manure with compost [10-13].
The presence of organic and inorganic contaminants in compost may, however,
constitute a danger to the environment. It is the heavy metal content which is the
main factor leading to restricted agricultural use of compost. Literature on the
effect of compost use on heavy metal levels in the environment shows it to vary
according to soil type, plant species and compost quality [14]. Increased Zn, Cu and
Pb levels have often been observed, both in the soil and plants, while other heavy
metals--such Cd, Ni and Cr---increase less consistently [4,13,15-17]. In the long
term, the use of sewage sludge can also cause a significant accumulation of Zn, Cu,
Pb, Ni and Cd in soil and plants [18,19]. Based on the cumulative research in
Europe [20] into the agronomic use of compost, heavy metals tend to accumulate in
soil and plants in the following order: Zn > Cu > Pb = Cd > Ni > Cr.
The problem of heavy metals can, however, be overcome by composting only
organic raw materials with a low level of potential contaminants. It has been shown
that the use of products with a low level of heavy metals does not affect soil or
plant metal content [21,22].
Much research indicates that the data necessary to confirm the validity of
compost as an organic fertiliser can only be obtained by conducting thorough
analyses and experiments in specific areas and on specific crops. In order to do this,
the Istituto Agrario di San Michele all'Adige in Italy set up a series of experiments
to test the use of compost on apple trees. The objectives were both to monitor the
effect of the compost on soil fertility and on the nutritional status of the plants and
to study its effect on heavy metal levels in soil and plants because of their potential
for environmental contamination.
In particular, it was decided that the effects of two composts-- one relatively
clean and one highly-contaminated with heavy metals--should be compared with
those of manure. This is because manure has traditionally constituted the only
source of organic matter returned to soils in farming in this area, but its availability
has currently declined to such an extent that it is necessary to find alternative
materials.
F. Pinamonti et al./Resources, Conservation and Recycling 21 (1997) 129-143 131
2. M a t e r i a l s a n d m e t h o d s
Table 1
Mean analytical characteristics of the 14 tested soils before treatment
Table 2
Average analytical characteristics of soil conditioners used
The results obtained from the 14 trials showed many similarities. The soils on
which the experiments were conducted had the same pedologic characteristics and
were cultivated with practically identical techniques (same tilling, fertilization and
irrigation techniques); no interaction with the study factor resulted from the
different trials (grafting combinations) and the different years. For the purpose of
134 F. Pinamonti et aL /Resources, Conservation and Recycling 21 (1997) 129-143
simplifying the presentation of and comment on the results, the mean has been
taken of all the data obtained from the 14 trials over the different years.
None of the treatments examined had any significant influence on the pH of the
soil; the mean values were as follows: control = 7.64; SB80 = 7.66; SB160 = 7.71;
MSW80 = 7.68; MSW160 = 7.73.
However, the higher amounts of both types of compost did lead to a significant
increase in the organic matter level compared to the control. The organic matter
content was 2.64, 2.67 and 2.68% respectively in the control, SB80 and MSW80
treatments, while significantly it reached 2.98 and 3.00% in the SB160 and MSW160
treatments.
3.1. Zinc
The use of both composts led to a significant increase in Zn levels in the soil,
both in 'total' and E D T A extractable form (Table 3). The Zn variations were more
marked with MSW compost and consistent with the amounts of both composts
tested. Moreover, for both composts, the percentage difference in relation to the
control was greater for E D T A extractable Zn than for the 'total' form. For
example, the MSWl60 treatment showed a 110% increase in extractable Zn and
61% in 'total' Zn.
No increase was recorded, in relation to the control, in the epigeous organs
(Table 4). The Zn content in the leaves and fruits was unaffected by the different
treatments.
3.2. Copper
3.3. Nickel
IIIII r
v v v
3..=
=~
r,,)~
136 F. Pinamonti et al./Resources, Conservation and Recycling 21 (1997) 129-143
Vl
~ .
~ O
E
~'~
F. Pinamonti et al. / Resources, Conservation and Recycling 21 (1997) 129-143 137
treatments. E D T A extractable Ni, on the other hand, increased at the same rate
when the two different amounts of MSW compost were applied. The percentage
increase in relation to the control plot was more marked for the E D T A extractable
Ni (78% and 113% respectively for the MSW80 and MSW160 treatments) than for
the 'total' Ni (24 and 47%).
Regarding the Ni uptake by the apple trees, the leaf analyses show that neither
SB or MSW compost brought about any accumulation in the leaves. The fruit
analyses, on the other hand, indicate that Ni may accumulate in the reproductive
organs of the plants treated with MSW compost (Table 4).
3.4. L e a d
SB compost had no significant effect on the level of this metal: the data obtained
(Table 3, Table 4) show how the use of this soil conditioner did not modify Pb
concentrations either in the soil or the plants.
MSW compost, however, significantly increased the level of both E D T A ex-
tractable and 'total' Pb in the soil; the percentage increase was more marked, in
relation to the control, in the case of the E D T A extractable form. These increases
were consistent with the amounts of compost applied and also led to an accumula-
tion of the metal in the vegetative organs, and, only in the case of the higher
amount of MSW compost, in the fruits. On all levels the Pb values recorded were
significantly higher for the MSWl60 than for the MSW80 treatment.
3.5. C a d m i u m
In all the treatments the 'total' Cd content in the soil was always below the
sensitivity of the analytical method (3 mg/kg).
The application of SB compost did not increase E D T A extractable Cd concentra-
tions in the soil, leaves or fruits (Table 3, Table 4). After the application of the
MSW compost there was an i n c r e a s e - - o f up to 50% in the case of the higher
a m o u n t - - o f E D T A extractable Cd in relation to the control.
For the MSW treatments, when E D T A extractable Cd increased in the soil, there
was a corresponding increase in the concentration in the leaves and fruits. Unlike
Pb, there was no difference in the concentration of Cd as a result of the two
different amounts of MSW compost.
3.6. C h r o m i u m
The three organic soil conditioners tested differed notably in their heavy metal
content (Table 2): the concentrations in the MSW compost were greater than those
in both the SB compost and the manure for all the elements examined, while the SB
compost contained much greater amounts of, above all, Zn (double the amount),
Cu (4 times the amount) and Pb (3 times the amount) than did the manure. The
effects of the various treatments studied on the 'total' heavy metals in the soil
(Table 3) can be related to the actual amounts of individual elements introduced by
the different soil conditioners (Table 5): the increases recorded through soil analyses
after 6 years correspond to the increases expected on the basis of the soil
conditioners applied. The results would seem to confirm the theory that all heavy
metals remain immobile in the surface of calcareous subalkaline soil [14,33,34].
Both amounts of the SB compost caused a significant increase in the level of Zn,
while only the SB160 caused the level of Cu to increase; their effect on the levels of
the others metals was insignificant. MSW compost, however, led to a far greater
introduction of all the heavy metals examined (Table 5), and brought about a
significant increase in their 'total' form in the soil. Moreover, the 'total' metal
content in the soil increased consistently with the amount of MSW compost
applied; for Zn, Ni, Pb and Cr, significant differences emerged between the MSW80
and the MSW160 treatments.
The SB compost did not bring about any significant difference in relation to the
control as regards EDTA extractable metals, apart from a Zn increase noted in the
SB160 treatment (Table 3).
Both amounts of MSW compost, on the other hand, brought about significant
increases in all EDTA extractable metal concentrations. EDTA extractable Zn and
Pb also registered significantly higher values in the MSW160 than in the MSW80
treatment (Table 3).
Table 5
Heavy metal's natural presence in the soil ( 0 - 3 0 cm) before the treatments and heavy metal a m o u n t s
introduced by the different treatments
For both composts the percentage increase, in relation to the control, of all the
heavy metals examined was higher for the EDTA extractable than for the 'total'
form. The application of MSW compost led to a significant increase in the
extractability of metals in the soil (the ratio EDTA extractable metal/'total' metal),
in contrast with the SB compost treatment, which did not significantly increase any
metal. This result highlights the difference between the two composts not only in
quantitative, but also in qualitative terms. The application of MSW compost caused
a redistribution of the heavy metals, especially the more mobile ones, among the
various chemical forms present in the soil.
3.10. Correlation between the heavy metal concentrations in soil, leaves and fruits
There are certain observations to be made on the correlation noted between the
forms of metal present in the soil and their concentration in the plants. For this
purpose indices of simple correlation were calculated between the concentration of
each metal in the soil (for both 'total' and EDTA extractable form), the leaves and
the fruits (Table 6). With the exception of Cd (due to the unavailability of the
relevant data for the 'total' form, the values being below the analytical method's
sensitivity of 3 mg/kg), statistically significant and positive correlations were
observed between 'total' and EDTA extractable concentrations in the soil for all the
metals. Despite the marked heterogeneity of the data regarding different soils, these
140 F. Pinamonti et al./ Resources, Conservation and Recycling 21 (1997) 129-143
Table 6
Simple correlation indices between the heavy metal content in soil, leaves and fruit
Zn Cu Ni Pb Cd Cr
*, significant with P<0.05; **, significant with P_<0.01; NS, not significant.
4. Conclusions
The experiment clearly demonstrates that MSW compost, used over a 6 year
period, increased concentrations of Zn, Cu, Ni, Pb, Cd and Cr in soils and, with the
exception of Zn and Cu, in apple leaves and fruits. However, no symptoms of
phytotoxicity by metals were observed in the trials.
SB compost, used over a 6 year period and containing a far lower amount of
heavy metals than MSW compost, only caused significant increases in the case of
Zn in the soil, and did not lead to any variation in the concentrations of the other
heavy metals tested. This compost, therefore, can be considered a valid alternative
to traditional commercial soil conditioners (manure) given that, if of high-quality,
it safeguards both the environment and healthy crops.
F. Pinamonti et al./Resources, Conservation and Recycling 21 (1997) 129-143 141
References
[1] Paris P, Robotti A. I1 recupero agricolo dei residui urbani a base organica. Genio Rurale
1981;7/8:21-33.
[2] Zucconi F, de-Bertoldi M. Utilizzazione in agricoltura dei prodotti di trasformazione dei residui
solidi urbani. Ingegneria Ambientale 1982;11(2):110-4.
[3] Ferreira ME, Cruz MCP. Estudo do efeito de vermicomposto sobre absorcao de nutrientes e
producao de met6ria seca pelo milho e propriedades do solo. Cientifica 1992;20(1):217-27.
[4] Bevacqua RF, Mellano VJ. Sewage sludge compost's cumulative effects on crop growth and soil
properties. Compost Sci. Utilization 1993;1(3):34-7.
[5] McConnel DB, Shiralipour A, Smith WH. Compost application improves soil properties. Biocycle
1993;34(4):61 6.
[6] Guidi G, Pera A, Giovannetti M, Poggio G, de-Bertoldi M. Variations of soil structure and
microbial population in a compost amended soil. Plant and Soil 1988;106:113-9.
[7] Ballif JL, Moncomble O, Descotes A. Influence sur le ruisselement et l'6rosion de couvertures de
compost urbain et d'6corces fraiches broy6es dans le vignoble champenois. ANPP Ann. 1991;3:359-
65.
[8] Vigna-Guidi G. Effetti del compost sulle propriet',i fisiche del terreno. Acqua Aria 1992;10:983-7.
[9] He XT, Traina SJ, Logan TJ. Chemical properties of municipal solid waste composts. J. Environ.
Qual. 1992;21:318 9.
[10] Del-Zan, F. Prove agronomiche di compost diversi per origine e tecnologia produttiva: effetti
indotti a breve termine sul terreno e su quattro colture erbacee. In: Istituto Agrario di San Michele,
editor. Compost: Production and Use. Proc. Int. Symp. Compost: Production and Use, 20-23 June
1989. San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy. Istituto Agravio di San Michele, Trento, Italy 1989:251-
270.
[11] Beyea J, De Chant L, Conditt M, Jones B. Wet bag composting trial yields promising results.
Biocycle 1993;34(4):72 5.
[12] Roe NE, Stoffella PJ, Bryan HH. Utilization of MSW compost and other organic mulches on
commercial vegetable crops. Compost Sci. Utilization 1993;1(3):73 84.
[13] Baldoni G, Cortellini L, Maroncelli C, Toderi G. Utilizzazione di fanghi di depurazione e di
compost su colture erbacee: risultati di un quadriennio di prove in area padana. In: Provincia di
Forli-Cesena, editor, Compost: dai rifiuti una risorsa per l'agricoltura. Cesena, Italy: Stampa Lito
Tuttastampa, 1994:117-127.
[14] Paris P, Lucianer A. Tra caratteristiche del suolo e ioni metallici cento equilibri mutevoli. Genio
Rurale 1986;11:21-8.
[15] Barbera A, Canepa D, Facco S, Franzin F. Metalli pesanti da concimi minerali e compost:
accumulo nel terreno. In: Istituto Agrario di San Michele, editor. Compost: Production and Use.
Proc. Int. Symp. Compost: Production and Use, 20-23 June 1989. San Michele all'Adige, Trento,
Italy: 1989:459-464.
[16] Zamborlini M, Facco S, Canepa D, Franzin F. Metalli pesanti da concimi minerali e compost:
assorbimento in alcune specie vegetali. In: Istituto Agrario di San Michele, editor. Compost:
Production and Use. Proc. Int. Symp. Compost: Production and Use, 20-23 June 1989, San Michele
all'Adige, Trento, Italy. Istituto Agravio di San Michele, Trento, Italy 1989:465-470.
[17] Businelli M, Gigliotti G. Applicazione del compost da residui solidi urbani in agricoltura. In:
Provincia di Forli-Cesena editor. Compost: dai rifiuti una risorsa per l'agricoltura. Cesena, Italy:
Stampa Lito Tuttastampa, 1994:114-15.
[18] Williams DE, Vlamis J, Pukite AH, Corey JE. Trace element accumulation, movement, and
distribution in the soil profile from massive applications of sewage sludge. Soil Sci.
1980;129(2):119 32.
[19] Mulchi CL, Adamu CA, Bell PF, Chaney RL. Residual heavy metal concentrations in sludge-
amended coastal plain soils. I. Comparison of extractans. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1991:
22(9/10);919-941.
142 F. Pinamonti et al. / Resources, Conservation and Recycling 21 (1997) 129-143
[20] CEE (Directorate General XII). Bibliography study of agronomic experiments related to the use
of urban waste composts. The problem of heavy metals. In:Lineres M. Institut National de la
Recherche Agronomique, F-33140 Pont de la Maye.
[21] Vigna-Guidi G, Petruzzelli G, Vallini G, Peru A. Plant productivity and heavy metal contamina-
tion. Biocycle 1990;31(6):46-8.
[22] Petruzzelli G, Vigna-Guidi G, Lubrano L, Canarutto S, Aiello M. Agronomic utilization of a
low metal sewage sludge: results from field experiments. Proc. Int. Conf. Heavy metals in the
Environment. CEP consultants, Edinburgh: 1991:383-386.
[23] Pinamonti F, Artuso I, Stringari G, Zorzi G. Investigation of compost-mulch in the vineyards of
Trentino: effects on the soil and culture. ANPP Ann. 1991;3:29-36.
[24] Zorzi G, Pinamonti F, Gasperi F, Cristoforetti A, Nardelli P, Candioli C. Impiego agricolo del
compost. Acqua Aria 1992;10:995-1006.
[25] Pinamonti F, Gasperi F, Zorzi G. Compost mulch of grapevines: effects on soil and plant. Proc.
Int. Symp. 'Agribiomediterraneo', Marseille (France), 24-26 November 1994:35.
[26] Pinamonti F, Zorzi G. Experiences of compost use in agriculture and in land reclamation
projects. In: de-Bertoldi, M, Sequi P, Lammers B, Papi T, editors. The Science of Composting,
Glasgow: Blackie Academic and Professional, 1995:517-527.
[27] Pinamonti F, Zorzi G, Gasperi F, Silvestri S, Stringari G. Nutritional status of grapevines and
apple-trees grown under various soil management techniques in the plant row. Acta Horticulture
1995;383:313-21.
[28] USDA (US Department of Agriculture).Soil Taxonomy: A Basic System of Soil Classifi-
cation for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. Malabor, Florida, USA: Robert E. Krieger,
1988.
[29] Zorzi G, Silvestri S, Cristoforetti A. Composting in Italy: current state and future outlook. In:
de Bertoldi M, Sequi P, Lammers B, Papi T. The Science of Ccomposting, editors. Glasgow:
Blackie Academic and Professional, 1995:698-713.
[30] Martin-Prevel P, Gagnard J, Gautier P. L'analyse vegetale dans le controle de l'alimentation des
plantes: technique et documentation. In: Prevel Martin P, Gagnard J, Gautier P, editors. Plant
analysis. USA: Lavoiser, 1987:161-178.
[31] GU (Gazzetta Ufficiale). Metodi ufficiali di analisi chimica dei suoli. DM 11 maggio 1992,
suppl. G.U.:121, 25 maggio 1992.
[32] IPLA (Istituto Piante Legno Ambiente). Metodi di analisi dei compost. In: Regione Piemonte,
Assessorato Ambiente, Torino, Collana Ambiente, 1992;6:170.
[33] Emmerich WE, Lund LJ, Page AL, Chang AC. Movement of heavy metals in sewage sludge-
treated soils. J. Environ. Qual. 1982;11:174-8.
[34] Giusquiani PL, Gigliotti G, Businelli D. Mobility of heavy metals in urban waste-amended soils.
J. Environ. Qual. 1992;21:330-5.
[35] Petruzzelli G. La problematica dei metalli pesanti nel compost. Acqua Aria 1992;10:989-94.
[36] Dean RB, Suess MJ. The risk to health of chemicals in sewage sludge applied to land. Waste
Manag. Res. 1985;3:251-78.
[37.] Petruzzelli G, Szymura I, Lubrano L, Pezzarossa B. Chemical speciation of heavy metals in
different size fractions of compost from solid urban wastes. Environ. Tech. Lett. 1989;10:
521.
[38] Davis RD, Stark JH, Carlton-Smith CH. Cadmium in sludge-treated soil in relation to potential
human dietary intake of cadmuim. In: Davis RD, Huker G, L'Hermite P., editors. Environmen-
tal Effects of Organic and Inorganic Contaminants in Sewage Sludge. 1983;103-110.
[39] Dean RB, Suess MJ. I1 rischio per la salute dovuto alla presenza di composti chimici nei fanghi
di depurazione smaltiti sul terreno. Rifiuti Solidi 1987;1(4):351-68.
[40] Korcak RF. Cadmiun distribution in field grown fruit trees. J. Environ. Qual. 1989;18:519-23.
[41] Cieslinski G, Neilsen GH, Hogue EJ. Effect of pH and soil Cd concentration on Cd uptake and
accumulation by apple trees. Acta Horticulturae 1995;383:47-56.
F. Pinamonti et a l . / Resources, Conservation and Recycling 21 (1997) 129-143 143
[42] Cieslinski G, Neilsen GH, Hogue EJ. Effect os soil cadmium application and pH on growth and
cadmium accumulation in roots, leaves and fruit of strawberry plants (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.).
Plant and Soil 1996a;180;267-276.
[43] Cieslinski G, Van Rees KCJ, Huang PM, Kozak L.M., Rostad HPW, Knott DR. Cadmium uptake
and bioaccumulation in selected cultivars of durum wheat and flax as affected by soil type. Plant
and Soil 1996b;182:115-124.
[44] Houba VJG, Lexmond TM, Novozamsky I, van-der-Lee JJ. State of the art and future develop-
ments in soil analysis for bioavailability assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 1996;178:21-8.