This document discusses the interpretation of essential goods and services under Section 14(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. It outlines how the scope has expanded over time based on court cases to include more utilities and inputs required to maintain the corporate debtor as a going concern. Key factors considered for determining essential status are whether the good or service is easily replaceable and has a direct nexus to the corporate debtor's operations. Guidelines are needed for more clarity around the resolution professional's assessment of essential supplies during the insolvency resolution process.
This document discusses the interpretation of essential goods and services under Section 14(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. It outlines how the scope has expanded over time based on court cases to include more utilities and inputs required to maintain the corporate debtor as a going concern. Key factors considered for determining essential status are whether the good or service is easily replaceable and has a direct nexus to the corporate debtor's operations. Guidelines are needed for more clarity around the resolution professional's assessment of essential supplies during the insolvency resolution process.
This document discusses the interpretation of essential goods and services under Section 14(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. It outlines how the scope has expanded over time based on court cases to include more utilities and inputs required to maintain the corporate debtor as a going concern. Key factors considered for determining essential status are whether the good or service is easily replaceable and has a direct nexus to the corporate debtor's operations. Guidelines are needed for more clarity around the resolution professional's assessment of essential supplies during the insolvency resolution process.
Interpretation of “essential goods and services” under Section 14 (2) of the Code.
Upon commencement of a CIRP, declaration of a moratorium one of the first steps.
CD kept as a going concern and assets are not eroded- basic objectives of a moratorium. Section 14(2) read with Regulation 32. Water, electricity, telecommunication and IT services cannot be terminated. Section 14 (2A) inserted through the 2020 Amendment – when RP considers goods or services essential to the going concern status of the CD. Early interpretation – very strict. ICICI Bank case – essential supplies cannot be used for making profits. Sundaresh Bhat- electricity was being used as input, so supply disconnected. Expansion of Scope – Canara Bank case and Shyam Pradhan case (insurance). Aircel India case – telecom license. ILC Report 2018 and 2020. Factors considered by RP – whether easily replaceable and whether direct nexus with going concern status of the CD. Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. – sole contract cannot be terminated only on grounds of insolvency. Harish Taneja – dues had to be paid for inputs under Section 14 (2A), or else, could be terminated. Sandeep Khaitan – reiterated Section 14 (2A). Issues – guidelines for determination of essential supplies by the RP, no guarantee for default, other issues – past payments risk and one-size-fits-all approach. Differences between Section 14 (2) and Section 14 (2A).