Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MARCH 2012
1
Table of contents
Abbreviations ..............................................................................................3
Acknowledgments.......................................................................................4
Background .................................................................................................5
Legal Framework ........................................................................................8
Constitutional equality rights ..................................................................8
Statutory provisions on rape ....................................................................8
Procedure to be followed in rape cases.....................................................10
Provisions on medical examinations ........................................................12
Practical challenges in collecting medical evidence.................................15
Interpretation of rape provisions by courts ...............................................17
Study of case records ................................................................................23
Description of the sample studied .........................................................24
Findings and analysis ............................................................................24
Age of the victim and the accused .....................................................24
Time and place of incident .................................................................25
Relationship with the accused ............................................................27
Nature of the incident.........................................................................28
Proceedings ........................................................................................29
Shalish ................................................................................................31
Medical examination records ................................................................34
MLC and FIR .....................................................................................35
Time of conducting medical examinations ........................................35
Place of Medical Examination ...........................................................36
Consent to medical examination ........................................................36
Personnel involved in conducting medical examinations ..................37
Recording of physical injuries ...........................................................37
Recording of mental state ..................................................................38
Obstetric/Gynecological Examination and Marital Status ................40
Treatment Prescribed .........................................................................43
Victim’s age .......................................................................................43
Medical Examiner’s Opinion .............................................................43
Medical examination and investigation .............................................45
Conclusions and recommendations ..........................................................47
2
Abbreviations
3
Acknowledgments
This short research study is part of the SAFE project, which seeks to
highlight issues of choice as critical parameters in asserting women’s
rights and liberties, in particular the right to freedom from violence. The
author is grateful to ICDDRB for its support.
This study builds on the BLAST’s work on the issue of violence against
women and sexual assault and is informed by research previously
conducted in this field by Sylvie Rougerie and Dina Siddiqui, as well as
insights provided by legal aid lawyers associated with BLAST. Other
than members of BLAST, practitioners from the field were also
consulted. Naripokkho’s Kamrun Alam and Rita Das deserve special
mention for sharing Naripokkho’s rich experience on this issue. Nijera
Kori and Mohila Porishod provided case records for analysis.
4
Background
Table 1
Cases Registered by the Police on Violence Against Women
(Information Collated by Naripokkho, 2011)
Year Dow Acid Abd Rape Rape Traf Mur Inju Othe
ry Atta uctio and ficki der ries r*
relat ck n Mur ng
ed der
2001 2986 153 1691 3178 20 63 82 63 4722
2002 4922 209 2236 4095 22 74 90 83 6700
2003 5869 258 2262 4442 28 74 73 120 7152
2004 3081 208 1594 3097 17 68 62 134 4568
2005 3130 206 2069 2796 22 138 97 49 2949
2006 3417 146 2089 2566 14 107 109 95 2558
2007 4186 177 2936 3495 33 113 142 74 3374
2008 4487 163 2874 3387 65 105 131 87 3032
2009 4061 129 2772 2900 39 100 139 94 2693
2010 5331 97 3391 3328 25 117 196 120 3768
Total 41,43 1746 23,71 33,28 285 959 1101 899 41,51
1
Approximately 23% of all cases of violence against women reported in the period 2001-2010
5
0 2 4 2
*This category is not defined.
However, these figures reflect only those complaints that have been
registered with the police, and not the actual number of rape incidents
that may have occurred.2
2
Other than police reports there is lack of public availability of information on pendency and disposal
of rape cases in court.
3 It must be noted that NGO statistics may not be entirely accurate based as they are on news reports
and not their own case records or original police or court records.
6
Total
1141 1276 1256 1193 1230 1305 1572 1579 1571 1628
No of
91 16 39 23 33 78 00 79 08 98
Crimes
* http://www.police.gov.bd/index5.php?category=48
4
Crimes reported include – dacoity, robbery, murder, speedy trial act, rioting, child abuse, kidnapping,
police assault, burglary, theft, arms act, explosive act, narcotics, smuggling, others.
5
India, NCRB; United Kingdom, Stern Review; United States
6
Moni Jharna; Bangladesh: Why Dhaka’s Rape Survivors Give Up on Justice: Women’s Feature
Service; February 8, 2010 http://periodicals.faqs.org/201002/2035982201.html
7
Legal Framework
7
CEDAW Committee, General Comment 19 “The Convention (CEDAW) in Article 1 defines
discrimination against women. The definition of discrimination includes gender-based violence that is,
violence that is directed against a women because she is a woman or that affects women
disproportionately. It includes acts that inflict physical, mental or sexual harm or suffering, threats of
such acts, coercion and other deprivations of liberty…”
8
For the purposes of Section 375, sexual intercourse is defined as requiring
penetration and marital rape is specifically exempted, unless the wife is
under 13 years of age. To this definition, the NSA adds a further
explanation:
“If a male person without marital relationship has sexual intercourse
with a woman above 16 years of age without her consent or with consent
obtained by putting her in fear or by deceitful means or with a woman
below 16 years with or without her consent he shall be presumed to have
raped such a woman.”
8
Section 9(1) NSA
9
Section 9 (2) NSA
10
Section 9 (3) NSA
11
Section 9(4) NSA
12
Section 9(5) NSA
13
Section 10- “Any person with a view to illegally satisfying his sexual lust by any of his organ or
matter touches genital organ or any other part of body of a woman or child or violates her modesty,
such act of that person shall constitute offence of sexual oppression and he shall be liable to rigorous
imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years but not less than 3 years and shall also be liable to
fine.”
9
effect of deterring women from filing complaints, as failure to prove a
case may attract penalties under this provision. Here it must be noted that
failure to prove case may be due to the inadequacy of evidence presented
and not, in all cases, because the case was inherently false.
If the police refuse to file an FIR, the complainant may file a petition
directly with the court 16 , which in cases of rape will be the Tribunal
established under the NSA (NSA Tribunal). 17 This is known as a
complaint case. In such cases, the court may take cognizance of the case
only if the petition reveals the likelihood of the commission of a crime
(the level of enquiry being slightly higher than a prima facie enquiry.
The IO is required at this stage to locate the accused record the evidence
of witnesses under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
(CrPC), prepare site plans of the place where the incident occurred,
confiscate weapons, and collect other physical evidence as part of the
investigation.18
14
The procedure is prescribed both under the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as the NSA.
15 Section 154 CrPC
16
Section 200 CrPC
17
Section 2(d) NSA
18
Section 4(1)(l) CrPC
10
Upon completion of investigation, the IO may submit a report ("charge-
sheet")19 if the investigation indicates that an offence has taken place, or
file a Final Report (‘FRT)’ if s/he finds there is no merit to the case.20 The
charge sheet has to be prepared or the investigation completed within 60
days.21 This period may be extended by an additional 30 days if required.
The IO has a duty to inform the complainant of the submission of the
charge sheet or the FRT as the case may be.
Once the charge sheet is admitted or the case is admitted after re-
investigation, a case docket is prepared and the trial commences. The
court then issues process, which in cases of rape mean that a warrant will
be issued. 22 If the warrant procedure is not honored or the accused does
not make an appearance, the police may either issue a proclamation or
attach the accused’s property. The trial begins thereafter.
The trial is to be concluded within 180 days from the date of ‘the receipt
of the case.23 If the trial is not complete within this time then the accused
may be released on bail and if not released, reasons recorded for non-
19
Section 272 of PRB and Section 173 CrPC
20
Rule 275 P.R.B.
21 Section 18 NSA
22 Part III Chapter VIIA CrPC
23 Section 20 (3) NSA
11
release. 24 The trial may also be held in the absence of the accused if
summons are not responded to or warrants not complied with.
The NSA is a stringent law that does not allow for release on bail and
provides for the imposition of severe penalties, including the death
penalty. This leads to many observing that NSA provisions are misused
as a tool for harassing or detaining political opponents or settling personal
vendettas. For instance, the 2010 Mainstream Law Report (MLR)- a
standard compendium of reported cases, in its commentary on rape,
cautions:
“Instances are not rare in our society that innocent persons are
implicated in false cases of rape with a view to satisfying grudge out of
enmity to harass under stringent provision of law relating to bail, trial
and punishment. The tribunal in such circumstances is required to
exercise great care and caution against false implication of innocent
person and exuberance unrelated with the reasonable standard of proof,
probability and improbability fairly based on the facts and circumstances
of each and every case so that the real culprits are punished.”
However, there are few statistics or studies to support this claim. A judge
and a public prosecutor interviewed in the NSA tribunal claimed that bail
is not impossible under NSA and is granted, particularly in cases of
simple hurt, by exercising of the inherent powers of the court.
24
Section 20(4) NSA
25
See Naripokkho report; Supra N 1. Also see infra discussion on ‘practical challenges’ in the next
section.
12
before a medical examination is conducted. 26 This provision further
provides that the failure to conduct medical examinations within
reasonable time is deemed to be inefficiency/ misconduct, punishable
with appropriate penalties and sanctions set out in the provision27
Along with the guidelines, the Ministry of Health also issued a standard
form for recording medical evidence in rape cases. This form is to be
used by all government and government designated health facilities for
recording evidence for both acid attacks and rape. The form provides
space for recording:
26
This is further clarified in the guidelines discussed next.
27
Section 32 NSA
28
A women’s collective working inter alia with women victims of violence.
13
• Informed consent of the victim to the examination, which is to be
attested by two witnesses.
• Date and time of examination
• Name and address of woman assistant
• Specifics of the incident – namely: the place, date and time, and a
brief description of the incident
• Results of physical examinations- including bodily structure,
weight, height, dental specifics.
• Other physical signs for identification
• Signs of physical force
It is also noted that the format allows for recording information not only
of the incident of sexual assault but also the sexual history of the victim.
The latter information may be used to discredit the victim’s testimony, in
line with Section 155(4) of the Evidence Act, which reads as follows:
However, neither the guidelines nor the format are being strictly followed
in the country. Medical examination facilities are mostly available only at
14
district levels and not lower at the upazila levels; and recording formats
are not always uniform. Naripokkho, which has consistently advocated
for the uniform adoption of both the guidelines and the format, points out
that in 2009 only 3 medical examinations were conducted at the upazila
level.
29
For further information see infra
30
Md. Abdul Mannan v State 51 DLR (1999) 154 Abdus Sobhan Biswas v State; 54 DLR (2002) 556,
Misti v State 6 MLR (HCD) 2001(412); Monir Hossain v State 59 DLR (2007) 416
15
• Cases involving sexual intercourse without consent (usually
accompanied by force or other forms of intimidation and coercion) and
• Cases involving sexual intercourse based on a promise to marry
that has later been breached.31 (Siddiqui 2011)
However, in both types of cases it has been observed that parties may
initiate or be pressurized to participate in mediations (shalish) for
compensation and/or marriage. It is only when the mediation fails that the
formal justice system is approached. This aspect of mediation has been
acknowledged and recorded in some higher court decisions.32 This means
that the medical examination is not conducted until the shalish is
completed - thus significantly delaying the medical examinations, which
ought to be collected within 72 hours of the incident. 33 On the other hand,
some practitioners observe that minors or children, who are victims of
rape, are usually brought to medical facilities earlier than adults, as they
sustain injuries that require immediate medical treatment. 34 A further
question arises here regarding whether invasive tests conducted on
children immediately after an incident, in the absence effective psycho-
social support for them, adds to the trauma of rape.
31
A number of cases brought to NSA tribunals involve cases of sexual intercourse based on a promise
to marry. See Abdul Kader v State 11 MLR HC 2006 (196); Sohel Rana v State 57 DLR (2005) 591;
Zitu v State Id.
32
Roni Ahmed Liton v State 14 MLR (HCD) 2009, Md. Abdul Quader v State 11 MLR 2006 (196);
Zitu Ahsan v State 59 DLR (2007) 528; Khairul v State 13 BLC 2008 (303)
33
See Infra N 39. See also http://www.nhs.uk/chq/Pages/2482.aspx
34
Interview with Naripokkho staff, October 2011
35
Excerpted from BLAST Exploratory Study by S.M. Rougerie; September 2011
36
However, the latter reason can be overcome if samples are collected at the upzila levels and sent for
analysis to higher levels.
16
• Tests are conducted during office hours: If the incident has taken
place at night or during after hours, the victim is usually retained in
police custody overnight before the facility opens in the morning.
This raises concerns of the victim’s safety while in custody.
17
victims of sexual abuse, prevailing patriarchal attitudes and inadequate
infra-structure for collecting good quality medical evidence may be major
reasons for under reporting or low conviction rates in rape cases.
37
Flavia Agnes; “To whom do experts testify? Ideological Challenges of Feminist Jurisprudence”;
EPW (40) 18: 1859-1866. To demonstrate the article quotes from Modi’s Medical Jurisprudence – the
authoritative text used across South Asia from the colonial times: “Beware- A charge of rape, of
attempted rape or of indecent assault may be made against the doctor or dentist- which may arise from
a genuine misunderstanding of the nature of medical examination (especially of breasts and genitalia).
A nurse or a female attendant/witness should be present while a male doctor examines a female
patient.”
38
Quoted in infra N 43; Sobuj v State 11 MLR (HC) 2006 (284)
39
Du Mont and White: The Uses and impacts of medico-legal assault cases: A global review; WHO;
2007
40
The analysis in this portion is limited to only reported cases
41
See the Indian case of Raja v State (1997) 2 Crimes 175 (Del)
42 Al Amin & Ors v State 51 DLR (1999) 154
18
“Law does not require any particular number of witnesses to prove a case
and conviction may be well-founded even on the testimony of a solitary
witness provided that his credibility is not shaken”
In Jahangir Hossain v State46 the court clarified that decisions where the
rule of prudence has been used if ‘read minutely, ( ) in each of these
cases, firstly the evidence of the prosecutrix was disbelieved not only on
the ground of it being uncorroborated, but on analyzing the evidence
itself and distrust to that particular woman”.
“the evidence of a victim of sexual assault stands almost at par with the
evidence of an injured witness and to an extent is even more
reliable…But if the victim of sexual assault comes from an ordinary and
lower strata and lower strata or she is proved to be a woman of ill-repute
or easy virtue, corroboration must be sought as a rule of caution.
43
Id. In this case the court also held that “the testimony of the victim of sexual assault is vital unless
there are compelling reasons which necessitate looking for corroboration of her statement, the court
should find no difficulty in acting on the testimony of a victim of a sex crime alone to convict an
accused where her testimony inspires confidence and is found to be reliable.”
44
Safazuddin v State 27 BLD (HCD) 2007 (321). In this case it was held that “There must be a
satisfaction on the part of the Judge that on the uncorroborated testimony of victim of sex crime it is
safe to record conviction upon an accused indicted for an offence of rape.” Hence there must be an
“indication in the course of Judgment that the Judge had this Rule (of prudence) in mind when he
prepared judgment and if the judge finds that there is no need for such corroboration he is to assign
reasons for dispensing with the necessity for such corroboration.” (Emphasis supplied)
45
Biplob v State 6 BLC (2001) 632
46
BCR 1983 HCD 144
19
In the instant case, the victim girl comes of a respectable educated family
having good background as she is the daughter of a Professor of a
college. She, as well as her father is not expected to lodge a false case
outraging her modesty and dignity and honor of her family.”47
The above is merely an illustration and it cannot be said that the court has
viewed the testimony of all persons belonging to the ‘lower strata’ with
suspicion in all cases.48 However, aspects of easy virtue or chastity are
recurring themes. Hence even when a woman’s sole testimony has been
used to base convictions on, it is because the particular woman is not
expected to make false accusations and therefore subject herself to the
“ignominy and embarrassment of being raped by the accused.”49
Marital status and the age of the woman have also been considered as
factors in determining the kind of corroboration required. To illustrate, in
Biplob v State50 the court observed that:
“In the case of a grown-up and married woman it is always safe to insist
upon corroboration”
Gender stereotypical notions also frame the manner in which courts have
interpreted the definition of rape. Rape, as defined under Section 375 of
47
Misti v State 6 MLR (HC) 2001
48
in Manirul Islam v State 8 MLR (HC) 2003 (27) the court observed, while assessing evidence in a
case in which the conviction was based on the victim’s sole testimony, observed that ‘ the victim, a
helpless village woman is telling the truth about her shameful ordeal in the hands of the accused.”
49 Id
50
Supra N 43; See also Hossian Shially v State; 8 MLR (HC) 2003 (355)
51
See also Sobuj v State 11 MLR (HC) 2006 where it is observed that “Rape, though a humiliating
event in a woman’s life and an unlawful intrusion on the privacy and sanctity of a female and
commission of rape upon women is on increase yet it is noticed that for ravishment upon a woman,
along with real rapists and offenders, innocent persons are trapped and brought in with ulterior
motive.’
52
For example, see Firoz Chokdar v State 11 MLR (HC) 2006
20
the Penal Code is inter alia sexual intercourse without consent or against
the woman’s will. However, the term ‘consent’ is not clearly defined. As
a result, courts have in most cases required evidence of force to
demonstrate lack of consent.
Rape Myths
…Across cultures, there exist a number of pervasive and remarkably negative beliefs that constitute the
historical schema of rape mythology. Overriding this taxonomy of assumptions is the general suspicion
of women’s claims of rape and an inclination to ‘down-play’ perpetrators’ responsibility and criminality
while shifting blame towards the victim based on her behavior and personal characteristics. Examples
of these common, prejudicial, stereotypical and false notions of rapes, raped women and rapists, as
captured in a study of 478 Supreme Court decisions on rape in Philippines are:
- Rape happens only to young, pretty or desirable women.
- Rape is a crime of lust or passion
- Men can have sex freely with women deemed to be of loose morals because these women have
nothing to lose.
- Rape is committed by maniacs or perverts.
- Rape happens only in poorly lit or secluded places
- Sexy clothes incite men to rape
- When a women’s chastity is threatened, she violently resists, attempts to escape or screams for
help.
- Women seeking to avenge slights or to extort money often fabricate rape charges.
Excerpted from “The uses and impacts of medico-legal evidence in sexual assault cases”; WHO 2007
“The word ‘rape’ literally means forcible seizure and that element is
characteristic feature of the offence. Therefore, it can be said that rape is
the forcible ravishment of a woman without her consent. The simplest
definition of rape it that it is having sexual intercourse with a woman
without her consent.”56
53
UN Division on the Advancement of Women; Handbook for Legislation on Violence against
Women; July 2010
54
Combating Rape Act (2000) of Namibia and Sexual Offences Act (2003) of Lesotho. Id
55
See also
56
10 BLC (2005) 196
21
The court has also relied upon dated texts of medical jurisprudence to
support the need for evidence of violence and force- in Biplob v State,57
the court quoted with approval from Taylor, Principles and Practice of
Medical Jurisprudence, Vol II for dealing with cases of rape on “a grown
up woman”:
Bruises upon the arms or the neck may be considered to constitute some
evidence of a struggle; and impressions of fingernails are also
significant. Bruises or scratches about the inner side of thighs and knees
may be inflicted during attempts to abduct the legs forcibly, and care
must also be taken to examine the back, for the victim may have been
pinned against the wall or floor. It is important to record these in detail,
and to say, if possible, how fresh they are. The aging of the bruises is, ( ),
a matter of some uncertainty in the absence of microscopy.
“The absence of any injuries on the person of the complainant may not,
by itself, discredit the statement of the complainant. Merely because the
complainant was a helpless victim who was by force, prevented from
offering serious physical resistance, she cannot be disbelieved. In this
situation, the non-production of a medical report would not be of much
consequence if there is evidence on record that is believable…58
A study of these judgments shows that the court seldom bases its
decisions on a particular aspect; instead a number of factors are viewed
together in arriving at a decision on whether rape has taken place. These
factors include the nature of injuries found, whether or not a medical
57
Supra N 44
58
” 1983 Cr.LR (SC) 413
22
examination was done, sexual history of the women, age and marital
status.59
However, this analysis does not aim to present trends in court decisions,
as not all court decisions are reported. Instead, it attempts to indicate
issues that are considered by courts in the adjudication of rape cases.
In the next section, case records of rape cases are studied to discern
commonalities in rape cases and the kind of evidence that is recorded.
59See Sohel Rana (Md) v State 57 DLR (2005) 591- “When the victim woman was
habituated to sexual intercourse with the appellant and it is found from the
evidence on record that she did not resist or raised any outcry and as seemingly a
willing partner, there is no offence of rape committed.”
60
Firoz Chokdar Supra N 51; Abdul Kader Supra N 31; Hossain Shially Supra N 49
61
See Misti Supra N 30- “Delay in lodging of FIR can be due to a variety of reasons particularly the
reluctance of the prosecutrix or her family members to go to the police and complain about the incident
which concerns the reputation of the prosecutrix and the honor of her family. It is only after giving it a
cool thought that a complaint of sexual assault is generally launched.” In this case the delay was thus
considered to be satisfactorily explained and hence not considered to be fatal.
23
collection of medico-legal evidence. As this study examines records in
cases that are ongoing, there is no attempt to correlate legal outcomes
with the documents examined.
All these cases have been filed under Section 9 of the NSA and are
pending before the NSA tribunal. A majority of these cases (42) have
been filed under Section 9 (1). Other provisions that have been used
include other sub-sections of Section 9 as well as Sections 5, 7 and 30 of
the NSA.
The cases involve incidents that have taken place in the past 10 years
(2001-2011), with a majority(42) taking place in the period 2008-2011.
Although the files do not mention the current status of the proceedings, in
more than half the cases (37) chargesheets have been filed.
24
Age of Victim
>10
11--16
17-22
<23
Not mentioned
The age of the primary accused range from 14 to 50 years. In nearly 40%
of the cases, the primary accused is between 18-25 years of age. In nearly
half the cases (46%), the age difference between the accused and the
victim is between 2-10 years.
Table 1
Comparison of Age of Victim and Accused
Age Range (in No. of Victims No. of Accused
years)
>10 8 0
11-16 20 1
17-22 16 13
23-28 3 15
29-34 3 9
35-40 0 6
41-50 1 8
Not mentioned 10 9
Table 2
Time of Incident
Time of the incident No.
Morning (7 a.m- 12 p.m.) 13
Afternoon (12 p.m.- 5 p.m.) 9
Evening (5 p.m.- 9 p.m.) 15
Night (9 pm- 7 am) 20
Not recorded 4
25
Time of the incident
Not recorded
In more than half the cases (68%), the incident took place either in the
victim’s place or in a place near the victim’s home. Table 3 provides
details on the places where the incident allegedly took place.
Table 3
Place of Incident
Place of Incident No.
Victim's house 26
Near Victim's house 14
Accused's house 5
Other (agricultural land, bazaar,
etc) 14
Not recorded 2
26
Place of incident
Victim's house
Accused's house
Table 4
Relationship with the accused
Relation with victim No.
Living in the same village 27
Relative 10
Neighbor 11
Employer, professional, service provider 3
No relationship 4
Boyfriend 5
27
Relationship with Victim
Relative
Neighbor
Employer, professional,
service provider
No relationship
The cases can be broadly categorized into three, first – cases involving
non-consensual sexual intercourse with the use of force (violent rapes),
second - cases involving minors (under 16 years of age) and third - cases
where sexual intercourse took place based on a promise to marry, which
was later reneged upon, in many cases after the woman was found to be
pregnant.
Table 5
Categorization of Incident
Nature of incident No.
Non-consensual sexual intercourse 19
Sexual intercourse with minors (with or without violence) 26
Sexual intercourse with promise to marry 16
Other than cases in the third category (involving sexual intercourse based
on the promise to marry), all the cases mention various forms of
intimidation and force. In a couple of cases, rape was committed after the
rape survivor had refused relations with the accused.
In many rape cases involving minors, the victim was acquainted with the
accused. A number of such cases involve allegations of kidnapping in
28
addition to rape. The mean age difference between the accused and the
victim in these cases is the maximum of the age differences observed (16
years) in all cases.63
Conclusions
- It is possible that cases involving rapes of minors are reported more than
cases involving victims above the age of consent.
- The accused are mostly older than victims
- Incidents of rape occur mostly at night.
- Most of the incidents occur either in the victim’s home or near the victim’s
home.
- Victims are likely to be either related to or acquainted with the accused.
- Rape cases can be broadly categorized into those involving
o Non-consensual sexual intercourse
o Minors (statutory rape)
o Sexual intercourse based on a promise to marry.
Proceedings
Comparing the date of the incident and the date of the FIR, it is found that
in a number of cases (37%), the FIR was filed within 3 days of the
incident, with 4 cases in which the FIR was filed on the same day. On the
other hand, there were major delays in 11% of the cases, where the FIR
was filed anywhere between after a couple of months to more than a year
after the incident.
Of the 35 cases where the FIR was filed without delay, a majority (46%)
involved rapes of minor victims. The comparatively large proportion of
such cases, when compared to higher age groups in cases where there has
been delayed reportage, indicates that rapes involving minors/ children
are reported more speedily than others involving older victims. Here
again, it is possible that, as these cases are handled by NGOs, which have
a particular focus on working with children, a larger proportion of such
cases are being pursued, or are given priority. It also may indicate that
there are fewer women above the age of consent (16 years) who are
seeking criminal redress from the formal justice system.
Table 5
Time between incident and FIR
Time between incident and FIR Nos.
Same day 4
63
The least mean age difference is in cases involving sexual intercourse based on a promise to marry.
29
Within 3 days 19
Within 10 days 6
10 days to a month 9
More than a month but less than 6 months 10
More than 6 months but less than a year 5
More than 1 year 2
Not recorded 6
Same day
Within 3 days
Within 10 days
10 days to a month
Not recorded
30
Whether or not the investigation is duly conducted cannot be assessed
from this data, even if it appears that investigation reports are filed in
time. It is observed that none of the chargesheets contain any information
that is not already present in the FIR. The chargesheets also mention
names and numbers of witnesses interviewed. In this sample, the number
of witnesses mentioned varied from 7 to17.
As may be expected in rape cases, there are hardly any direct witnesses to
the incident and most of the witnesses interviewed are family members,
neighbors and others to whom the victim the victim or her family may
have reported the incident (e.g. police officers, magistrate, examining
doctors).
Shalish
Although rape is a cognizable, non-compoundable, and non-bailable
offence, in a relatively large number of cases (37%), of which 5 involve
rapes of minors shalish was attempted before legal proceedings were
initiated. More positively, it was found that in most rape cases involving
minors, shalish is not attempted.
In three cases it is mentioned that shalish was attempted more than once
(between 3-6 times). In most cases, shalish was attempted by the village
elders or matbors. In three cases, the shalish was conducted by members
of the Union Parishod and in one case by the lawyer. In a majority of
these cases, the shalish did not result in any outcome. This indicates that
shalish may be attempted in a significant number of cases, with legal
proceedings being initiated only when the shalish does not result in any
resolution. Significantly, in two cases, it is mentioned that the accused
and the victim were married after the shalish or after the FIR was filed.
Comparing the date of the incident with the date of the FIR in cases
where shalish has been conducted it appears that, except in one case, FIRs
were filed after some delay. In some cases, the FIRs was filed within 15
days while in some others the FIR was filed after the lapse of anywhere
between 6 months to a year. This indicates that cases, where shalish is
attempted, are rarely filed soon after the incident occurs. This has
substantial implications for the collection of medical evidence. Since
medical examinations are, in practice, usually conducted only after FIRs
have been filed, any delay in registering FIRs seriously affects the quality
of medical evidence collected. In fact, it is recommended practice that
31
medical examinations of rape survivors should take place within 72 hours
of the incident.64
64
See N 33
32
Conclusions
- FIRs appear to be registered more speedily in cases involving rapes of
minors than in cases involving rapes of older victims.
- Fewer complaints filed by victims who have attained the age of consent,
(16 years and above) may indicate that fewer women in this age group are
seeking redressal from the formal justice system
- On filing the FIR, investigators are generally able to meet time frames
prescribed in the NSA. This indicates that time prescriptions in the law
encourage speedy investigations.
- Evidence in rape cases is mostly collected from the victim’s family
members or others whom the victim or her family may have reported the
incident to.
- In a significant number of cases, criminal proceedings are initiated only
after shalish attempts fail to resolve the issue.
- Shalish is not, in most cases, attempted in cases involving rapes of minor
victims.
- Attempts at shalish delay filings and medical examinations thus adversely
impacting on trial outcomes.
33
Medical examination records
In this section, findings of the study of medico-legal records (MLR) are
presented.
65
There may be many reasons for missing medical examination reports. However, it is noted that all
the cases where medical reports are missing involve women over 16 years of age. This too, might
indicate that it is more likely that medical examinations are conducted in cases of minor rape.
34
MLC and FIR
In all except three cases, the medico-legal examination was conducted
after an FIR was filed. The existence of these three instances shows that it
is possible to get a medical examination done without filing an FIR.
In half of these cases (14), the FIR was registered within 3 days of the
incident. Since most of the cases in this section involve rapes of minors,
all the cases where the FIR is recorded, and consequently medical
examinations done on time, involve victims who were less than 16 years
of age. From this sample it appears that the earliest a medical
examination is done is within 2 days after the incident.
Considering that these cases are being closely monitored by NGOs, this is
perhaps an indication that 2 days is the shortest time within which
medical examinations are conducted.
Predictably, in all the cases where there has been a delay of a month or
more, shalish has been attempted. Shalish has also been attempted in
most of the cases involving delays of less than a month but over three
days. On the other hand, no shalish, except in 1 case, has been attempted
in cases that have been filed within a couple of days of the incident. This
indicates the conduct of shalish delays reporting and consequently
medical examinations.
35
compares the time of the incident with the time at which the examination
was conducted.
Table 6
Comparing time of incident and time of medical examination
Time Incidents MLE
Morning (7 a.m- 12 p.m.) 13 2
Afternoon (12 p.m.- 5 p.m.) 9 19
Evening (5 p.m.- 9 p.m.) 15 -
Night (9 pm- 7 am) 20 -
Not recorded 4 4
This means that in many cases, the victim is kept in custody till the
medical examination takes place. Some practitioners report that in certain
cases, the victim is retained in the custody of the police station, which in
turn raises issues of ensuring her safety. The non-availability of medical
examinations after office hours, when the incident is most likely to take
place, may be a major deterrent to victims seeking legal redress.
66
Referred by Modhupur Thaa, Dhonbari Thana, Char Jabur Thana (2), Kotwali Thana, Bakalia Thana,
and Begumganj Thana.
36
provide space to allow the victim to consent to certain aspects of the
procedure or to decline consent to any part of the procedure.
The medical board constituted for this purpose has not certified most of
the forms. However, it is apparent from the few certified form that both
male and female medical officers constitute medical boards. This
indicates that though female medical officers are available, they are not
present in adequate numbers since male medical officers primarily
conduct examinations on rape victims.
One of the reasons for this could be the time lapse between the incident
and medical examination. It is observed that in all the cases (except one)
where physical injuries have been found, the medical examination was
done within 2 days of the incident, whereas in all the cases where the
examination was conducted after long delays, no physical injuries were
37
found. This finding highlights the need for medical examinations being
conducted immediately after the rape incident. However, it must be born
in mind that not all rape is committed with the use of physical force, as
other forms of coercion and intimidation may also be used. In fact
research shows that injuries are seen only in one third of cases on sexual
assault.67
The form also allows the medical officer to record his/her finding on the
nature of injuries sustained. It is found that in 15 cases, the medical
examiner did not record anything under this entry. One of the reasons for
this may be that the medical examiner has already recorded a description
or the signs injuries sustained. Another reason may be that this portion is
left blank when no sign of injury has been found. However, there are
some cases where the medical examiner has recorded both the description
of the injury as well as the nature of the injuries. These diverse practices
indicate that there is a lack of clarity on how findings on physical injuries
should be recorded in MLR forms. It may also indicate a lack of uniform
understanding among medical officers on how such entries are to be
made.
In cases where the medical examiner made a recording, there are two
findings of simple injury, three findings of grievous injury and nine cases
where no injuries were found. The nature of injuries found corresponds to
the findings on signs of injury mentioned above.
One possible conclusion that can be drawn from the low finding of
physical injuries could be that not all rape is committed with the use of
force and instead, coercion and intimidation is been used to vitiate
consent, especially in cases of rape involving minors.
Table 7
67
Bower, Dalton; Female victims of rape and their genital injuries; Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997 May;
104 (5): 617-20, quoted in CEHAT; Review of Sexual Assault Examination Forms and Manuals
Prepared by the Appointed High Court Committee; Mumbai; 2011
http://www.cehat.org/go/uploads/SexualViolence/Critique.pdf. See also McGregor et al; Sexual Assault
forensic medical examination: is evidence related to successful prosecution? Ann Emerg Med. June
2002; 39: 639-647 where it was found that genital injury is absent in more than 50% of cases of sexual
assault, even among victims presenting to a hospital based service. Quoted in CEHAT; Manual for
Medical Examination of Sexual Assault; Mumbai; 2010
38
Observations on “Mental State”
Observation Numbers
“Worried” 2
‘Normal’/ ‘sound’ 8
Insane 2
Not recorded 16
There may be a number of reasons for this kind of reporting. First, the
victim may not manifest any recent trauma due to the delay in reporting.
Second, not all victims may manifest any signs of trauma but appear calm
and composed. Finally, it is possible that the medical examiners, being
physical practitioners, are not equipped to identify mental trauma
accurately. To demonstrate, ‘worried’ cannot possibly be an accurate
representation of what, as in these cases, 12 and 14 year-old rape victims
may be experiencing. Also the terms ‘insane’ have little clinical
relevance, as it does not indicate the nature and extent of mental illness, if
any.
39
Rape Trauma Syndrome
(Excerpt from CEHAT Manual for Medical Examination of Sexual Assualt)
‘Rape Trauma Syndrome’ was first described by Burgess and Holmstrom in the year 1974. The identification
of this syndrome by them was based on the analysis of 92 adult women rape survivors whom they interviewed
and followed up. They delineated the symptomatology of this syndrome into two phases.
Phase 1, the acute phase, is one of disorganization. The survivor feels shock and disbelief regarding the rape.
They may initially react in two ways:
(1) In the expressed style, patients display anger, fear and anxiety and often cry and
(2) In the controlled style, the patient remains calm and composed and displays little outward emotion.
Often, the controlled patient needs permission to express her emotion. This phase can last from 6
weeks to a few months...
Phase 2 – the reorganization phase, is a long term process in which the survivor develops certain coping
mechanisms. Reorganization may include stages of outward adjustment, personal integration. However, it
is most important for doctors to realize that not all survivors will have similar kinds of symptoms. Some
may exhibit more severe forms of symptoms constituting the syndrome, some might have few and others
may have no symptoms at all…
Another aspect routinely recorded (only three of the reports did not
contain any details of such examinations) is the findings of examinations
of genital organs. Findings pursuant to an examination of the mons pubes,
labia majora, labia minora and vestibule are mostly noted as ‘normal’,
‘healthy’ or ‘ok’. Only two MLRs recorded injuries. Similarly results of
examining the fourchette and cervix and rectum, which appear to be
conducted routinely, are mostly ‘healthy’ and ‘normal’, with only a few
recordings that are different. Although required, results of rectal
examinations are mostly not recorded (in 19 cases).
Table 8
40
Findings of hymen examinations
Recording No.
Old tear 8
Healthy 5
Ruptured 3
Ill Defined 1
Thick, fleshy, elastic and
tough 1
Not recorded 10
It is clear that the examiners use the finger or the 2-finger test to examine
the vaginal canal. In this test, the medical examiner
‘notes the presence of the hymen and the size and so-called laxity of the
vagina of the survivor. This test is widely used in efforts to assess whether
unmarried girls and women are ‘habituated to sexual intercourse’.68
Only in nine cases have these details of the 2-finger test not been
recorded. In others observations recorded are as follows:
Table 10
Observations recorded for examinations of
the vaginal canal
Description No.
Admits 2 fingers 4
Admits 2 fingers easily 3
Admits 2 fingers loose 3
Admits 2 fingers tightly 1
Admits 3 fingers easily 4
Healthy 2
Admits 1 finger loose 1
Only in one instance is there an additional recording that the genital area
was ‘reddish, tender and blood-stained’. It must be noted that in 12 cases
the finger test was conducted on minor/child victims. In one case, the
finger test was conducted on a victim found to be 26-27 weeks pregnant.
It is also noted that finger tests are also conducted in cases where there
have been significant delay in reporting the incident. This indicates that
finger tests are routinely conducted on all rape victims.
68
Human Rights Watch; Dignity on Trial: India’s Need for Sound Standards for Conducting and
interpreting forensic examination of rape survivors’; www.hrw.org
41
There appear to be no commonalities in the nine cases where findings
from this examination have not been recorded. These MLRs do not record
reasons for not conducting the finger test. However, it is observed that in
six of these cases, medical examinations were conducted in the shortest
possible time (i.e. within 2 days) and involved minor/child victims. In
three of these cases, the examining officer found signs of forceful sexual
intercourse, as well as signs of physical injuries. This indicates that
although finger tests are routinely conducted, such tests are not
necessarily required by medical examiners to arrive at a finding of forced
sexual intercourse.
Excerpt from
BLAST Exploratory Study by S.M. Rougerie
The finger test, which is a standard practice at the OCC-DMCH, (One Stop Crisis Center) is a practice that
involves the doctor inserting one or more fingers into the rape survivor’s vagina, to note the presence of absence of
the hymen, the laxity of the vagina, and vaginal tenderness. Where a medical report submitted to the court notes
that the victim was “habituated to sex”, that finding is generally based on the so-called laxity of the victim’s
vagina, as measured by the finger test.
The finger test is problematic in many ways. First of all, it has been denounced by doctors around the world as
having no scientific value. An obvious reason for this is that doctors’ fingers may be of different sizes, meaning
that the perception of laxity will differ from one doctor to the next. A number of other concerns have been raised
about the finger test’s forensic value, with the general conclusion being that women’s bodies come in different
shapes and sizes, and that the insertion of a finger cannot lead to a conclusion about a woman’s sexual past.
Doctors have also indicated that the presence or absence of the hymen is not necessarily a conclusive sign that
penetration has or hasn’t taken place.
Aside from being scientifically untenable, the finger test is also painful and invasive for rape survivors,
particularly young girls. One interviewee confirmed that the test had previously been used on one of her ten-year
old clients, who cried and screamed throughout the procedure. It is not difficult to imagine that the test, which is
intended to simulate penetration, is also traumatic for rape survivors.
Finally, aside from a finding of vaginal tenderness being used as evidence of forceful penetration, the results of the
finger test have no legal relevance. An alleged finding of laxity, or “habituation to sex”, has no bearing on the
legal requirements of rape: sexual intercourse and the absence of consent. Even if the test permitted drawing
conclusions about the survivor’s sexual past, those conclusions would be immaterial to any allegation of rape. In
fact, including such a conclusion in the medical report serves no purpose but to fuel defence counsel’s attempts at
disparaging the victim’s character. In India, the Supreme Court has already ruled that the finger test cannot be
used against a woman in court, and that any evidence that a woman is habituated to sex is inadmissible.
The course of this research has already revealed that the OCC-DMCH, which has one of the largest and most
women-friendly forensics departments in the country, performs the finger test as part of its normal examination.
However, further research will be required to determine how widespread its use is in other hospitals.
42
Treatment Prescribed
It appears that medical examinations are conducted on rape victims with
the sole purpose of collecting evidence to be used in court and no
treatment or care is prescribed to the victims following the examination.
This is inferred from the fact that in almost all the cases, spaces provided
for advice and referral have been left blank; even in the few cases where
grievous injuries have been discerned. The possibility of treatment being
provided without documentation is not ruled out. However, there is a risk
that such treatment may be given in an informal manner, thus making it
difficult to ensure the accountability of the treatment/service provider to
the victim, given that no recordings are made of the same.
It is also found that in a majority of the cases (28) no further tests have
been advised or recorded. In others the most common tests recommended
are ultrasound, x-ray and pathological tests. There is one instance where
the rape victim was rendered pregnant as a consequence of rape, in which
a DNA test was advised.69
Victim’s age
After conducting the examinations, the medical examiner has to provide
an estimate of the victim’s age. This has been done in 16 of the cases in
this sample. In half of these cases (8) the ages tally exactly. In others (8),
the age has increased by a minimum of 1 and maximum of 3 years in all
but one case.70 Although there is a significant increase in the ages in the
latter cases none of these cases involve a lapse in reporting time of more
than a couple of months.
The forms do not provide space for recording the methods used to
determine age. It is also not known whether any age related documents
(e.g. birth certificate, school leaving certificate) were presented to the
examining officer for further verification.
69
The facts in this case involved sexual intercourse based on a promise to marry.
70
In this case the age of the MLC is 17-18 years, whereas the FIR mentions the age of the victim to be
12 years.
71
In one of these cases there was a delay of 3 years between the incident and the registering of the FIR
43
In a number of cases (9) it is opined that ‘no sign of forced sexual
intercourse has been found’. In comparatively fewer cases (6) it is opined
that ‘signs of forced sexual intercourse has been found’. There is no
elaboration of the term ‘forced’ used in these opinions. As mentioned
earlier, it is not necessary that all rape is accompanied by physical force.
In many cases, duress is applied through coercion and intimidation, e.g.
when a person is threatened with injury or when an abuser is a position of
authority vis-a-vis the victim as happens in cases of rape. Four of the
cases where ‘no sign of forceful intercourse’ was found involved sexual
intercourse on a promise to marry. In others various violent acts have
been alleged, including one case where the victim has alleged gang rape.
44
by physical force. In fact, it is noticed that in all cases where signs of
forceful intercourse have been found are also cases where physical
injuries have also been found (not in all cases to the genital organs). This,
however, does not negate the possibility of using intimidation in cases of
rape.
The relatively small number of cases where other evidence has been
collected by the investigators, when compared to the large number of
cases where the medical report has been filed along with chargesheets,
72
This means that chargesheets have been filed in 25 of the 28 cases where the medical examination is
complete.
45
indicates that the medical report is the most crucial evidence that is relied
upon by State investigators and the court.73
Conclusions
• It is likely that more medical examinations are conducted on minor/children
under the age of 16 than on women in higher age groups.
• Although most medical examinations are conducted after the FIR is filed, it
is possible to get an examination done even before an FIR is filed.
• Medical examinations are conducted routinely in all cases, even if there is a
considerable delay between the incident and complaint, when the likelihood
of finding evidence is reduced.
• Medical examinations are conducted during office hours although most
incidents of rape take place at night, which means that victims may have to
be kept in custody till such tests, are conducted.
• Most medical examinations are conducted at the district level, which are in
most cases, a considerable distance from where the incident occurs or where
the victim lives.
73
• Filing of between
A comparison time
an FIR is lapses in
deemed toreporting and age
be consent show
to the allthat there is no correlation
investigative procedures between
either.
including medical examinations. Victims’ consent to specific aspects and
forms of testing are not taken, nor is the victim given the option to decline
any tests part of the medical examination procedure. 46
• Medical examinations are mostly conducted by male medical officers in the
presence of a female attendant.
Conclusions and recommendations
It appears from this sample that cases involving minor/child victims are
reported and attended to more than cases involving women in higher age
groups. This means that these cases involving minors are reported shortly
after the incident of rape, shalish or mediation is not attempted in most
cases and medical examinations are done on time. In the absence of
publicly available disaggregated statistics on police complaints and court
proceedings this cannot be identified as a trend but rather as an indication
that requires further exploration. However, the efficacy with which such
cases are treated ensures that medical examinations yield reliable
evidence.
On the other hand, this data indicates that in cases involving women in
higher age groups, i.e. women above 16 years of age, there are major
delays in reporting. In a number of instances, this is due to shalish
attempts to reach a settlement before recourse is sought under the formal
justice system. Delayed complaints result in delayed medical
examinations that may have deleterious impacts on trial outcomes. This
gives rise to cause for serious concerns as the analysis of decisions of the
higher judiciary shows that medical evidence is insisted upon in most
cases involving adult women, particularly if they are married.
47
• Use of the two finger test is not only unreliable but reinforces
gender stereotypes and is hugely traumatic for victims. It must be
noted that the cases studied in this paper show that injuries or signs
of ‘forceful sexual intercourse’ can be discerned even without the
conduct of these tests. However, victims are not given an option to
refuse to undergo such tests as initiation of legal proceedings is
deemed to be consent to all forms of investigative proceedings
including medical examinations of all forms.
• The lack of female medical officers to conduct such tests may also
be a reason for women’s hesitation in undergoing such tests.
48
• Provide for or authorize medical professionals at the local (upazila)
levels to conduct medical examinations and record the physical and
mental state of women victims of sexual assault. Record creation
immediately after the incident will yield reliable evidence that can
be used whenever the victim is ready to initiate legal proceedings.
• Repeal Section 155(4) of the Evidence Act that allows the victim’s
testimony to be discredited if she is shown to be of generally
immoral character.
49