YES

I am in favour of 'videoarbitrage' and consider it essential to provide the

means to 'serve aid to the referee, whose work is very difficult, as he has to
decide in tenths of a second

It should be borne in mind that football is a business with a lot of money by

means.

A person's decision (not just the referee, but also a player's) involves millions
of euros. If we have the means to reduce these errors, I am in favour of using
them.

The ease with which the arbito is wrong can be very simple because people do
not realise how difficult it is to arbitrate because I am in favour of being able to
help the referee, but also of football maintaining its nature

Any progress, whether technological or any other, is good for this sport.
Progress is made in materials, in technology and in many other respects, and
football must also move forward so that it does not get bogged down.

NO

I think that the use of the 'var' means that some uncertainty is lost, from
football mysticals

Butterfly is about mistakes, like nosotros, players can make mistakes, los
árbitros make mistakes. If it's always been asy and nosotros, then we
understand the football in this way.

Football has been forced to evolve in order to adapt to a much more

technological and modern world, but limits must be set so as not to lose the
essence that has made it the most popular sport on the planet.

I personally feel that in certain situations it is not well used and there is no
criterion for judges to decide.

The referee often cannot see the move to decide well what to decide to make
and influences many situations for harm in the game.