Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Power sharing is the distribution of power among the organs of the government like legislature, executive and
judiciary. It is an intelligent step to ensure the stability of political order. Power sharing also includes sharing at
different levels like union, state and locals.
With the help of examples of Belgium and Sri Lanka we will see how power sharing is handled by democracies.
BELGIUM
Geographical Position: Small country in Europe, bordered by the Netherlands, France and Germany.
Area and Population: Smaller in area than the Indian state of Haryana. Population a little over one crore, half
of the state of Haryana.
1% speaks German
In Brussels the Dutch speaking people are in a minority which is the opposite of the rest of the country, where
they are in a majority.
The minority population of French speaking people was richer than the Dutch speaking people. The majority
community was given benefits much latter. This led to tensions between the two communities in the 1950s
and 1960s. Tension was more acute in the capital city of Brussels.
Sri Lanka
Geographical Position: A small island in Asia, off the southern coast of Tamil Nadu.
Majoritarianism : A belief that only the majority community should rule a country, make laws for everyone
and with total disregard to the wishes and needs of the minority.
Majoritarianism in Sri Lanka Sri Lanka became independent in 1948. It immediately adopted measures to
impose Sinhala supremacy.
It made Sinhalese the official language of the country (by an Act in 1956), and ignored
Tamilcompletely.
Made a preferential policy to favour Sinhala-speaking people in all government jobs andeducational
institutions.
It promoted and protected Buddhism.
Result:
The Tamils felt alienated. No respect or recognition was given to their language, cultureand religion.
They began a struggle for equality in jobs, entry to the university, recognition oftheir language and
culture.
The Tamilians were grouped together in the North and East of Sri Lanka. Their demands wereignored,
the conflict became more severe and by the 1980s, the Tamilian demand had changed.They wanted
TAMIL EELAM in the North and East.
A Civil war broke out which resulted in thousands of dead.
Sri Lanka’s flourishing economy suffered.
Belgium amended the Constitution to accommodate every ethnic community because of which it did not
suffer civil war.
1. Equal number of Dutch and French speaking minister were appointed in Central Government.
2. State government not made subordinate to central Government.
3. A separate Government for Brussels, equal representation for both the linguistic groups
4. A third government called the Community Government elected by the Dutch, French and German
speaking people in charge of language, cultural and educational issues.
Prudential Moral
Reduce the The spirit of
possiblity of conflicts democracy calls for
between different power sharing
social groups.
Short Answers:
Q.1. What led to the ethnic tension in Belgium? Why was it more acute in Brussels?
Ans. The ethnic tensions in Belgium erupted because of the economic development between the two linguistic
communities. The French speaking population was rich and powerful while those speaking Dutch were not as
influential. The Dutch speaking people got the benefit of economic development and education much later.
This was the reason for ethic tension between the two communities. The tension was more in
Brussels because the French speaking population was in majority while those speaking Dutch was in minority.
HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Power is shared among different organs of the Power is shared among governments at different
government levels
No one organ has unlimited power The constitution outlines the powers of different
levels of government
There is a system of checks and balances There is general government for the country and
Eg. India, Switzerland provincial or regional governments Eg. Belgium,
Germany, Spain
Q.8. What are the different forms of power sharing in modern democracies?
Among different organs of government
Among governments at different levels
Among different social groups
Among different political parties, pressure groups and movements
Long answers-
Q.3 What is majoritarianism? Describe the majoritarian measures taken by the leaders of the Sinhala
community to establish their supremacy. What were its results?
Ans. Majoritarianism is a belief that the majority community should be able to rule the country in which ever
way it wants, by disregarding the wishes and needs of the minority
In 1956, an Act was passed to recognize Sinhala as the only official language
The governments followed preferential policies that favoured Sinhala applicants for university
positions or government jobs
A new constitution stipulated that the state would protect and foster Buddhism
The measures increased the feeling of alienation among the Sri Lankan Tamils.
The relations between the Sinhala and Tamil communities became worse
The Sri Lankan Tamils felt that none of the major political parties of the Buddhist Sinhala leaders were
sensitive to their language and culture
They felt that they were being denied equal political rights and were discriminated in government jobs
and other opportunities
The Sri Lankan Tamils started struggle for recognition of Tamil as official language, regional autonomy,
equality of opportunity in education and jobs
By 1980s, demand for an independent Tamil Eelam (state) in northern and eastern parts of Sri Lanka
was put forward by some political organizations
War started and thousands of people were killed. Many people were forced to leave the country.
Many lost their livelihoods
It caused a terrible setback to the social, cultural and economic life of the country
Q.5 How is the composition of capital city of Brussels different from Belgium as a country?
Belgium: Dutch speaking 59%, French speaking 40%, German speaking 1%.
Brussels: French speaking 80% and Dutch speaking 20%.
Dutch speaking people are in majority in the country but they are in minority in Brussels.
French speaking people are in minority in the country but are in majority in the capital city of Brussels.
Q.6. What do we learn from the two stories of Belgium and Sri Lanka?
Ans. In Belgium the leaders respected the feelings and interests of all communities and were successful in maintaining
the unity of the country.
The leaders recognized the existence of regional differences and cultural diversities
They took various steps such as amendments to the constitution in order to work out an arrangement that
would enable everyone to livetogether within the same country
The arrangements such as equal number of ministers from Dutch and French speaking people has worked
successfully
The majority community in Sri Lanka tries to force its dominance over other communities
It has brought the country nearer to a civil war and the unity of the country is threatened
This shows that the path of accommodation is better than that of majoritarianism and power sharing must be
followed
Moral : These emphasize that the power sharing is valuable because it is good for democracies
It is the basis of democracy
It is the very spirit of democracy
In a democracy people who are affected by the policies of the government should have a right to be consulted in
the governance of thecountryQ.14Trace the existence of the term democracy
It was believed that all power of a government must rest in one person or a group of persons located at one
place
It was presumed that if the power to decide is dispersed, it would not be possible to take quick decisions