Notes

Class 10 Chapter 1 – Power Sharing Civics

 ‘Ethnic’:- Ethnic means a social division based on shared culture and common descent.
People belonging to an ethnic group need not have the same religion or nationality.
 Majoritarianism:- A belief that the majority community should be able to rule a country in
whichever way it wants, by disregarding the wishes and needs of the minority is majoritarianism.

Story of Belgium
 Belgium is a small country in Europe with a population of over 1 crore, about half the
population of Haryana. Of the country’s total population,
59% speaks Dutch language,
40% of people speak French and the remaining
1% speak German.
 The minority French-speaking community was rich and powerful, so they got the benefit of
economic development and education.
 This created tensions between the Dutch-speaking and French-speaking communities during
the 1950s and 1960s.
Belgium power-sharing model:
 In Belgium, the government handled the community difference very well. Between 1970 and
1993, Belgian leaders amended their constitution four times and came up with a new model
to run the government.
 Here are some of the elements of the Belgian model.
1. The Constitution prescribes that the number of Dutch and French-speaking ministers shall
be equal in the Central Government. Some special laws require the support of the majority
of members from each linguistic group. Thus, no single community can make decisions
unilaterally.
2. The state governments are not subordinate to the Central Government.
3. Brussels has a separate government in which both communities have equal
representation.
4. Apart from the Central and the State Government, there is a third kind of government. This
‘community government’ is elected by people belonging to one language community –
Dutch, French and German-speaking – no matter where they live. This government has the
power regarding cultural, educational and language-related issues.
The Belgium model was very complicated but it helped to avoid civic strife between the two
major communities.
Story of Sri Lanka
 Sri Lanka is an island nation having a population of 2 crores, about the same as in Haryana.
 Sri Lanka has a diverse population. The major social groups are the
Sinhala-speakers (74%) and
the Tamil-speakers (18%).
 Among Tamils, there are two subgroups, “Sri Lankan Tamils” and “Indian Tamils”.
 Sinhala community enjoyed the bigger majority and imposed its will on the entire country.

Majoritarianism in Sri Lanka

 Sri Lanka emerged as an independent country in 1948. The Sinhala community was in the
majority so they had formed the government. They also followed preferential policies that
favoured Sinhala applicants for university positions and government jobs. These measures
taken by the government gradually increased the feeling of alienation among the Sri Lankan
Tamils. Sri Lankan Tamils felt that constitution and government policies denied them equal
political rights, discriminated against them in getting jobs and other opportunities and ignored
their interests.
 Due to this, the relationship between the Sinhala and Tamil communities become poor. Sri
Lankan Tamils launched parties and struggles for the recognition of Tamil as an official
language, for regional autonomy and equality of opportunity in securing education and jobs.
 But their demand was repeatedly denied by the government. The distrust between the two
communities turned into widespread conflict and turned into a CIVIL WAR.
 As a result, thousands of people of both the communities have been killed. Many families were
forced to leave the country as refugees and many more lost their livelihoods. The civil war
ended in 2009 and caused a terrible setback to the social, cultural and economic life of the
country.
What have you learned from the Stories of Belgium and Sri Lanka?
 Both countries are democracies but they dealt differently with the concept of power
sharing.
 In Belgium, the leaders have realised that the unity of the country is possible only by
respecting the feelings and interests of different communities and regions. This resulted in
mutually acceptable arrangements for sharing power.
 Sri Lanka shows that, if a majority community wants to force its dominance over others and
refuses to share power, it can undermine the unity of the country.

Power sharing
Why is power sharing desirable?
You will find the answer to this question in the points below.
1. Power sharing is good because it helps to reduce the possibility of conflict between social
groups.
2. The second reason is that, a democratic rule involves sharing power with those affected by
its exercise, and who have to live with its effects. People have a right to be consulted on how
they are to be governed.
 Let us call the first set of reasons Prudential and the second moral. The prudential reasons
stress that power sharing will bring out better outcomes, whereas the moral reasons
emphasise the act of power sharing as valuable.

Form of Power Sharing

 Most of you must think that Sharing power equal to dividing power or weakening the country.
A similar thing was believed in the past.
 It was assumed that all the power of a government must reside in one person or group of
persons located at one place. Otherwise, it would be very difficult to make quick decisions and
to enforce them. But these notions have changed with the emergence of democracy.
 In a democracy, people rule themselves through institutions of self-government. Everyone
has a voice in the shaping of public policies. Therefore, in a democratic country, political
power should be distributed among citizens.
In modern democracies, power sharing can take many forms, as mentioned below:
1. Power is shared among different organs of government, such as the legislature,
executive and judiciary. This is called horizontal distribution of power because it allows
different organs of government placed at the same level to exercise different powers. Such
separation ensures that none of the organs can exercise unlimited power. Each organ
checks the others. This arrangement is called a system of checks and balances.
2. Power can be shared among governments at different levels – a general government for
the entire country and governments at the provincial or regional level which is called federal
government.
3. Power may also be shared among different social groups such as the religious and
linguistic groups. ‘Community government’ in Belgium is a good example of this
arrangement. This method is used to give minority communities a fair share in power.
4. Power sharing arrangements can also be seen in the way political parties, pressure
groups and movements control or influence those in power. When two or more parties
form an alliance to contest elections and if they get elected, they form a coalition
government and thus share power.

Some que.
What is the system of checks and balances? – ans> point 01
 What is the coalition government? – ans> point 04

‘Lebanon’—conflict related to power-sharing disputes were resolved by power

sharing:
People from various communities lived in Lebanon’s capital city, Beirut, and fought a bitter
Civil War amongst themselves. As a result, thousands of people of various communities were
either killed or lost their livelihood. At the end of this Civil War, Lebanon’s leaders came
together and agreed to some basic rules for power-sharing among different communities. As
per these rules it was agreed that:
 The President would be from Maronite sect of Catholic Christians;
 The Prime Minister must be from the Sunni Muslim community;
 Deputy Prime Minister would be from an Orthodox Christian sect;
 Speaker—a Shia Muslim.
As per the pact, the Christians agreed not to seek French protection and Muslims agreed
not to seek unification with the neighbouring state of Syria.

Chapter 2 – Federalism
Federalism
What is federalism?
 Federalism is a system of government in which power is divided between a central authority
and various constituent units of the country.
 A federation has two levels of government. Both these levels of governments enjoy their power
independent of the other.
1. One is the government for the entire country that is usually responsible for a few subjects of
common national interest.
2. Governments at the level of provinces or states that look after much of the day-to-day
administering of their state.
Difference between Unitary System and Federal System
Unitary System Federal System

There is only one level of government or the There are two or more levels (or tiers)
sub-units are subordinate to the Central Government. of government.

The Central Government can pass on orders to the provincial or The Central Government cannot order
local government. the state government to do something.

The central government is supreme, and the administrative State Government has powers of its
divisions exercise only powers that the central government has own for which it is not answerable to
delegated to them. Their powers may be broadened and narrowed the central government.
by the central government

Features of Federalism - Some of the key features of federalism system are:

1. There are two or more levels (or tiers) of government.
2. Different tiers of government govern the same citizens, but each tier has its own
JURISDICTION in specific matters of legislation, taxation and administration.
3. The existence and authority of each tier of government is constitutionally guaranteed.
4. The fundamental provisions of the constitution cannot be unilaterally changed by one
level of government. Such changes require the consent of both the levels of government.
5. Courts have the power to interpret the constitution and the powers of different levels of
government.
6. Sources of revenue for each level of government are clearly specified to ensure its financial
autonomy.
 7. The federal system has dual objectives: i) To safeguard and promote the unity of the
country ii) Accommodate regional diversity.
Different Routes through Which Federations Can be Formed
Two aspects are crucial for the institutions and practice of federalism:- mutual trust between the
government of different levels and agreement to live together. There are two kinds of routes
through which federations have been formed.
1. “Coming together” - independent States coming together on their own to form a bigger
unit. This kind of “coming together” federations is formed in the USA, Switzerland and
Australia.
2. ‘Holding together’ - A large country decides to divide its power between the constituent
States and the national government. This kind of ‘holding together’ federations is followed in
India, Spain and Belgium countries.

India a Federal Country

Distribution of legislative powers - All the features of the federal system apply to the
provisions of the Indian Constitution. The Indian Constitution is a three-fold distribution of
legislative powers between the Union Government and the State Governments. The 3 lists
are mentioned below:
1) Union List (97 Subjects): It includes subjects of national importance such as the defence
of the country, foreign affairs, banking, communications and currency. The Union
Government alone can make laws relating to the subjects mentioned in this list.
2) State List (66 Subjects): It contains subjects of State and local importance such as police,
Land, trade, commerce, agriculture and irrigation. The State Governments alone can make
laws relating to the subjects mentioned in this list.
3) Concurrent List (47 Subjects): It includes subjects of common interest to both the Union
Government as well as the State Governments. The list includes education, forest, trade
unions, marriage, adoption and succession. Both the Union as well as the State
Governments can make laws on the subjects mentioned in this list. If their laws conflict with
each other, the law made by the Union Government will be considered.
Note – Residuary subject - Those subjects which are not mentioned in any of the three list
or any other matter that arise with passage time

Federalism Practised in India

The real success of federalism in India is attributed to its nature of democratic politics. Have
a look at some of the major ways in which federalism is practised in India.
1. Linguistic States
The creation of linguistic States was the first and a major test for democratic politics in India.
From 1947 to 2017, many old States have vanished and many new States have been created.
Areas, boundaries and names of the States have been changed. Some States have been
formed of the people who speak the same language. These states are known as Linguistic
States.
2. Language Policy
A second test for Indian federation is the language policy. Hindi was identified as the official
language. Besides Hindi, there are 21 other languages recognised as Scheduled Languages
by the Constitution. States too have their own official languages and government work takes
place in the official language of the concerned State.
3. Centre-State relations
Restructuring the Centre-State relations is one more way in which federalism has been
strengthened in practice. If no single party gets a clear majority in the Lok Sabha, the major
national parties can alliance with many parties including several regional parties to form a
government at the Centre. This led to a new culture of power sharing and respect for the
autonomy of State Governments.
Decentralisation in India
 When power is taken away from Central and State governments and given to the local
government, it is called decentralisation.
 The basic idea behind decentralisation is that there are a large number of problems and
issues which are best settled at the local level. Local people can also directly participate in
the decision making.
 A major step towards decentralisation was taken in 1992. The Constitution was 73rd & 74th
Constitution amended to make the third-tier of democracy more powerful and effective.
 Here are the key features of 3-tier democracy:
1. It is constitutionally mandatory to hold regular elections to local government bodies.
2. Seats are reserved in the elected bodies and the executive heads of these institutions for the
Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST) and Other Backward Classes (OBC).
3. At least one-third of all positions are reserved for women.
4. State Election Commission has been created in each State to conduct panchayat and
municipal elections.
5. The State governments are required to share some powers and revenue with local
government bodies. The nature of sharing varies from State to State.

73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments

 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments were passed by Parliament in December, 1992.
Through these amendments local self-governance was introduced in rural and urban India.
The Acts came into force as the Constitution (73rd Amendment) Act, 1992 on April 24, 1993
and the Constitution (74th Amendment) Act, 1992 on June 1, 1993. These amendments added
two new parts to the Constitution, namely, 73rd Amendment added Part IX titled “The
Panchayats” and 74th Amendment added Part IXA titled “The Municipalities”. The Local
bodies–‘Panchayats’ and ‘Municipalities’.

Panchayati Raj System (73rd Amendment)

 Rural local government is popularly known as Panchayati Raj. Each village, or a group of
villages in some States, has a gram panchayat. This is a council consisting of several ward
members, often called panch, and a president or sarpanch. They are directly elected by all
the adult population living in a village or ward. Gram Panchayat is the decision-making
body for the entire village.
 The Panchayat works under the overall supervision of the Gram Sabha. All the voters in the
village are its members. It has to meet at least twice or thrice in a year to approve the annual
budget of the gram panchayat and to review the performance of the Gram Panchayat.
 When Gram Panchayat are grouped together, they form a Panchayat
Samiti or Block or Mandal. The member of Panchayat Samiti representative are elected by
all the Panchayat members in that area.
 All the Panchayat Samitis or Mandals in a district together constitute the Zilla (district)
Parishad. Members of the Lok Sabha, MLAs of the district, some other officials of other
district-level bodies are the members of Zilla Parishad.
Municipalities (74th Amendment)
 As Gram Panchayat is for Rural areas, similarly we have
Municipalities for urban areas. Big cities are constituted into
Municipal Corporations. Both Municipalities and Municipal
Corporations are controlled by elected bodies consisting of
people’s representatives. The Municipal Chairperson is the
political head of the Municipality. In a Municipal Corporation
such an officer is called the Mayor.
 This new system of local government is the largest experiment in
democracy conducted anywhere in the world. Constitutional status
for local government has helped to deepen democracy in our
country. It has also increased women’s representation and voice
in our democracy.
Union Territories: Some units of the Indian Union, which are too small to become an
independent state and could not be merged with any of the existing states, are called Union
 Territories. They are also called ‘Centrally Administered Territories’. For example, Chandigarh,
Lakshadweep.
Coalition government: A government formed by coming together of at least two political
parties. Usually, partners in a coalition form a political alliance and adopt a common
programme. For example, National Democratic Alliance (NDA), the United Progressive Alliance
(UPA) and the Left Front.
Chapter 3 – Democracy and Diversity
A Story from Mexico Olympics
 During the Medal Ceremony of the 200 metres race which was held in 1968 Olympics at Mexico
City, two African-American athletes Tommie Smith and John Carlos raised a black-gloved fist
during the playing of the US national anthem. They had won the gold and bronze medals
respectively. With this gesture, they tried to draw international attention to racial
discrimination in the United States. The black-gloved and raised clenched fists were meant to
symbolise Black Power. That pictures shown an important landmark in the history of the Civil
Rights Movement in the United States.
 Civil Rights Movement - Martin Luther King Jr. led the civil rights movement in USA which
lasted from 1954 to 1958. The movement was a struggle for social justice for the Black
Americans to gain equal rights under the law in the United States of America (USA). People
followed the Gandhian methods of civil obedience against racist rules and regulations.
 Black power movement: - It is a movement that started in 1966 and went on until 1975. It
movement advocated the use of violence under necessary conditions to end racism in the
USA. Its goal was total racial equality.
 Migrant - Anyone who moves from one country or region to another for work, studies, etc.
 Homogeneous society - A society that has similar types of people without ethnic discrepancies
of any kind.
Differences, Similarities, Divisions
 The story from the Mexico Olympics shows an example of social divisions and social
inequalities. But in society, there are other forms of social divisions that exist.
 We know that regional, linguistic and religious differences have created social divisions.

Origins of Social Differences

 Social differences: - The social differences are mostly based on birth and some on our
choices.
 For example, people around us are male or female, they are tall and short, have different kinds
of complexions, or have different physical abilities or disabilities.
 But some of the differences are based on our choices. For example, some people are
atheists’ i.e they don’t believe in God or any religion. While some people believe in God.
 There are various other choices such as choosing what to study, which occupation to take
up and which games or cultural activities to take part in.
Social Divisions
 Social Divisions - It is a conflict based on various social inequalities, such as income,
religion, lifestyle, etc. or
 Social differences imply a state when people are discriminated or one class/group is given
preference over the other, due to the difference in their social, economic or racial inequality.
 Overlapping and cross-cutting are the two types of social differences.
1. Overlapping Differences - When one kind of social difference becomes more important
than the other and people start feeling that they belong to different communities, this is known
as overlapping differences.
It results in social division and disintegration. For Eg, in India Dalits face this type of
discrimination as they belong to poor families.
2. Cross-Cutting Differences - If social differences cross-cut one another, it means that
groups that share a common interest on one issue are likely to be in different sides on a
different issue. For example, the Northern Ireland and the Netherlands both were
predominantly Christian but divided between Catholics and Protestants.
 Politics of Social Divisions
 The combination of politics and social divisions is very dangerous and explosive.
 Democracy involves competition among various political parties. If they start competing in
terms of some existing social divisions, it can make social divisions into political divisions
and lead to conflict, violence or even disintegration of a country.

What can be the range of outcomes of politics of social divisions?

 In Northern Ireland, the difference between the two major sectors of Christianity i.e 53% of
Protestants and 44% of Roman Catholics took the form of politics.
 The Catholics were represented by Nationalist parties who demanded that Northern Ireland
be unified with the Republic of Ireland, a predominantly Catholic country.
 The Protestants were represented by Unionists who wanted to remain with the UK, which is
predominantly Protestant. Later on, it took a drastic form which ended by taking the lives of
hundreds of people.
 In Yugoslavia, political competition along religious ending ethnic lines led to the
disintegration of Yugoslavia into six independent countries.
 At the same time, every expression of social divisions in politics does not lead to such
disasters. But, it affects voting in most countries, especially in India.

Three Determinants Politics of Social Divisions

3 Factors are crucial in deciding the outcome of the politics of social divisions:
1. The outcome depends on how people perceive their identities. If people see their identities
in singular and exclusive terms, it becomes very difficult to solve.
2. It depends on how political leaders raise the demands of any community. It is easier to
accommodate demands that are within the constitutional framework and are not at the cost
of another community.
3. It depends on how the government reacts to the demands of different groups.
 In a democracy, the political expression of social divisions is very normal and can be healthy.
 This allows various disadvantaged and marginal social groups to express their grievances
and get the government to attend to these.
 Chapter 4 – Gender, Religion and Caste
Gender and Politics
Gender division
 The gender division tends to be understood as natural and unchangeable.
 Sexual Division of Labour:- A system in which all work inside the home is either done by the
women of the family while men are expected to work outside to earn money.
 This belief is not based on biology but on social and expectations and stereotypes.
 Feminist movements - Social movements that aim at establishing equality between men and
women are called feminist movements.
 Patriarchal society: - A patriarchal society is essentially male dominated. The line of descent is
traced through the father. Men are valued more in terms of work they do and the place they hold
in society. This gives them more power than women.
 The political expression of gender division and political mobilisation helped to improve women’s
role in public life. As India is a male-dominated, PATRIARCHAL society, women face
disadvantage, discrimination and
Women's Oppression in various ways -
1. Literacy Rate: The literacy rate among women is only 65.46% compared with 82.14% among
men.
2. Jobs: There is very low percentage of women in the high paid and high value jobs as just a few
girls are encouraged to take up higher education.
3. Wages: Despite The Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 provides that equal wages should be paid to
equal work, women in all areas are paid lesser than men, be it sports, cinema, agriculture or
construction works.
4. Sex Ratio: Most parents prefer boy children to girl children, Female infanticide and feticide are
common in our country. This has resulted in unfavourable sex ratio.
5. Social Evil: Society in general and urban centres in particular, is not safe for women. Dowry
harassment, physical abuse, sexual harassment are routine tales.
Women’s Political Representation
 Issues related to women are not given adequate attention.
 This has led many feminists and women’s movements to the conclusion that unless women
control power, their problems will not get adequate attention.
 In India, the percentage of elected women members in Lok Sabha touched 14.4 percent of its
total strength for the first time in 2019. Their share in the state assemblies is less than 5 per
cent.
 One way to solve women’s problem is to have a fair proportion of women in the elected
bodies.
 In Panchayats and Municipalities, one-third of seats in local government bodies are reserved
for women.
 Now there are more than 10 lakh elected women representatives in rural and urban local
bodies. Gender division is an example that some form of social division needs to be expressed in
politics.

Religion, Communalism and Politics

Religion - The division based on religious differences are often expressed in the field of politics.
In India, there are followers of different religions. People should be able to express in politics
their needs, interests and demands as a member of a religious community.
Communalism
The use of religion in politics is called communal politics:
1. When beliefs of one religion are presented as superior to those of other religions
2. When the demands of one religious group are formed in opposition to another
 3. When state power is used to establish the domination of one religious group over the rest.
Communalism can take various forms in politics as mentioned below:
1. The most common expression of communalism is in everyday beliefs involves religious
prejudices, stereotypes of religious communities and belief in the superiority of one’s
religion over other religions.
2. A communal mind often leads to a quest for political dominance of one’s own religious
community.
3. Political mobilisation on religious lines involves the use of sacred symbols, religious
leaders, emotional appeal and plain fear in order to bring the followers of one religion
together in the political arena.
4. Sometimes communalism takes its most ugly form of communal violence, riots and
massacre. India and Pakistan suffered some of the worst communal riots at the time of the
Partition.
Secular State
India is a secular state. Some of the features of India Secular states are:
1. There is no official religion for the Indian state.
2. The Constitution provides to all individuals and communities freedom to profess,
practice and propagate any religion, or not to follow any.
3. The Constitution prohibits discrimination on grounds of religion.
4. The Constitution allows the state to intervene in the matters of religion in order to ensure
equality within religious communities. For example, it bans untouchability.

Caste and Politics

 Caste and politics both have some positive and some negative aspects. Let’s look at them:
Caste Inequalities
 In most societies, occupations are passed on from one generation to another.
 Caste system is an extreme form of this. In this system, members of the same caste, the
group were supposed to form a social community that practiced the same or similar
occupation, married within the caste group and did not eat with members from other caste
groups.
 With economic development, large scale urbanisation, growth of literacy and education,
occupational mobility and the weakening of the position of landlords in the villages, the old
notions of Caste Hierarchy are breaking down.
 The Constitution of India prohibited any caste-based discrimination and laid the foundations
of policies to reverse the injustices of the caste system.
Caste in Politics
Caste can take various forms in politics:
1. When parties choose their candidate or when governments are formed, political parties
usually take care that representatives of different castes and tribes find a place in it.
2. Political parties and candidates in elections make appeals to caste sentiment to win the
elections.
3. To gain support political parties raise caste-based issues during elections to get political
support, as ‘one man one vote’ system or adult franchise has made the voter very
powerful.
4. Political Parties have made people belonging to lower castes conscious about their rights
to vote and their powers.
During elections caste matters, but it is not everything.
 There are many other factors that impact the elections. People’s assessment of the
performance of the government and the popularity rating of the leaders are considered during
elections. Just have a look at the below points:
1. Candidates and parties need to win the confidence of more than one caste and community to
win elections.
2. No party wins the votes of all the voters of a caste or community.
3. Some voters have more than one candidate from their caste while many voters have no
candidate from their caste.
 4. The ruling party and the sitting MP or MLA keep changing whenever fresh elections take
place.

Politics in caste
Politics also influence the caste system and caste identities by bringing them into the political arena. Here are
a few points that support this;
1. Each caste group tries to become bigger by incorporating within it neighbouring castes or sub-castes.
2. Various caste groups are formed with other castes or communities and then they enter into a dialogue and
negotiation.
3. New kinds of caste groups have come up in the political arena like ‘backward’ and ‘forward’ caste groups.
 Thus, caste plays different kinds of roles in politics. In some cases, caste division leads to tensions, conflict
and even violence.
Chapter 5 – Popular Struggles and Movements
Movement for Democracy in Nepal
 Nepal won democracy in 1990. King Birendra, who has accepted constitutional monarchy,
was killed in mysterious massacre of the royal family in 2001.
 King Gyanendra, the king of Nepal, was not prepared to accept democratic rule.
 Nepal witnessed a popular movement in April 2006, which was aimed at regaining popular
control over the government from the king.
 All the major political parties in the parliament formed a Seven Party Alliance (SPA) and called
for a four-day strike in Kathmandu. They demanded;
a. Restoration of parliament
b. Power to an all-party government
c. A new constituent assembly
 The protest was joined by the Nepalese communist parties (NCP- Maoist) which did not
believe in parliamentary democracy.
 On 24 April 2006, the king was forced to accept all the three demands.
 In 2008, the kingship was abolished and Nepal became a federal democratic republic.
 In 2015, it adopted a new constitution. The struggle of the Nepali people is a source of
inspiration to democrats all over the world.

Bolivia’s Water War

 Bolivia is a poor Latin American country.
 In the face of pressure by the World Bank, the government was forced to sell off its municipal
water supply to a private enterprise called FEDECOR or MNC.
 This resulted in very high water bills, which were unaffordable for most people.
 As a result, in 2000, the country saw widespread protests led by the alliance of labour, human
rights, and other community leaders.
 Under pressure, the government had agreed to the terms of the negotiation.
 However, it yielded no results. This caused the people to start the protests all over again.
 The government tried its best to curb the protests. The government restored police brutality
and was later forced to introduce martial law to bring the protestors under control.
 However, it was the power of the people who won at last. The owners of the MNC were forced
to flee from the country, and the water supply was restored to the government with previous
rates.

Democracy and Popular Struggles

The stories of Nepal and Bolivia were different from each other. The movement in Nepal was to
establish democracy, while the struggle in Bolivia involved claims on an elected, democratic
government. Both these struggles show their impact at different levels. Despite these
differences, both instances involved critical role of political organisations.
Here are some points which demonstrate how democracy has evolved all over the world:
1. Democracy evolves through popular struggles.
2. Democratic conflict is resolved through mass mobilisation. Sometimes, conflict is
resolved by using the existing institutions like the parliament or the judiciary.
3. The conflicts and mobilisations are based on new political organisations, which include
political parties, pressure groups and movement groups.
 Mobilisation and Organisations
In a democracy, different kinds of organisations work behind any big struggle. These
organisations play their role in two ways.
1. Direct participation in competitive politics which is done by creating parties, contesting
elections and forming governments. However, every citizen does not participate so
directly, other than through voting.
2. There are many indirect ways in which people can get governments to listen to their
demands or their points of view. This is done by forming an organisation and undertaking
activities to promote the interests or viewpoints of people. Such groups are known as
“interest groups or pressure groups”.
Differences between political parties and pressure groups
 Pressure groups do not enjoy power directly, whereas the political parties do.
 Pressure groups usually represent a particular section or view of the society; on the other
hand, political parties represent bigger social divisions.
 Pressure groups do not contest elections, whereas political parties contest elections and run
the government.
 At a given point of time, a person can be a member of only one political party but a member of
many pressure groups.
 Examples of pressure groups are Lawyers Association, Teachers 'Association, Trade Unions,
Students 'Unions and so on. Examples of political parties are BJP, INC, NCP etc.

Pressure Groups and Movements

 Pressure groups are organisations that attempt to influence government policies. These
organisations are formed when people with common occupation, interest, aspirations or
opinions come together to achieve a common objective.
 A Movement attempts to influence politics rather than directly taking part in electoral
competition. It’s a small organisation which depends on spontaneous mass participation of
people than an interest group. Eg: Narmada Bachao Andolan, Movement for Right to
Information, Anti-liquor Movement, Women’s Movement, Environmental Movement.

Sectional Interest Groups and Public Interest Groups

Sectional Interest Groups Public Interest Group

They aim to promote the interests of a particular section or They aim to help groups other than their
group of society. own members.

They represent a section of society. Eg: Trade unions, They are also called promotional groups.
business associations and professional (lawyers, doctors,
teachers, etc.)

Their principal concern is the betterment and well-being of They aim to help groups other than their own
their members, not society in general. members.

The members of the organisation may not benefit from the
cause that the organisation represents.
Eg: Bolivian organisation, FEDECOR.
In some instances, the members of a public
interest group may undertake activity that
benefits them as well as others too.
Eg: BAMCEF (Backward and Minority
Communities Employees Federation)

Movement Groups –
 Movement Groups are of two types: Issue specific and Generic Movements.
 1. Issue Specific - Most of the movements are of these types that seek to achieve a single
objective within a limited time frame.
 Example: Nepalese movement for democracy arose with the specific objective of reversing the
king's orders that led to suspension of democracy.
 Narmada Bachao Andolan started with the specific issue of the people displaced by the
creation of Sardar Sarovar dam on the Narmada river.
 Its objective was to stop the dam from being constructed. Gradually it became a wider movement
that questioned all such big dams and the model of development that required such dams.
 Movements of this kind tend to have a clear leadership and some organisation. These
movement usually have short life.

2. Generic Movements
 These movements seek to achieve more than one issue in a very long term. Example:
Environmental movement and the women's movement.
 There is no single organisation that controls or guides such movements.
 All of these have separate organisations, independent leadership and often different views
on policy related matters.
 Sometimes these broad movements have a loose umbrella organisation as well. For
example, the National Alliance for Peoples' Movements (NAPM).
 NAPM- NAPM stands for National Alliance for Peoples' Movements. It is association of
organisations which coordinates the activities of a large number of peoples' movements in
India.

Pressure Group and Movements influence politics

They exert influence on politics in a variety of ways:
1. They try to gain public support and sympathy for their goals and their activities by
carrying out information campaigns, organising meetings, filing petitions, etc.
2. They often organise protest activities like strikes or disrupting government programmes.
3. They try to influence the media into giving more attention to these issues.
4. Some persons from pressure groups or movement groups may participate in official bodies
and committees that offer advice to the government.
The relationship between political parties and pressure groups can take different forms.
Some direct and indirect ways are:
1. In some cases, the pressure groups are either formed or led by the leaders of political
parties or act as extended arms of political parties. For example, most trade unions and
students’ organisations in India are either established by or affiliated to one or the other
major political parties.
2. Sometimes political parties grow out of movements.
For example, when the Assam movement led by students against the ‘foreigners’ came to
an end, it led to the formation of the Asom Gana Parishad.
3. In most cases, the relationship between parties and interest or movement groups is not so
direct. In this case also, the dialogue and negotiation take place as most of the new leaders
of political parties come from interest or movement groups.

Influence of Pressure/Movement Groups on Indian Politics

Positive Influences
 Pressure groups and movements have deepened democracy.
 Governments can often come under undue pressure from a small group of rich and powerful
people.
 Public interest groups and movements perform a useful role of countering this undue
influence and reminding the government of the needs and concerns of ordinary citizens.
Negative Influences
 Sometimes, pressure groups with small public support but lots of money can hijack public
discussion in favour of their narrow agenda.
 These groups exercise power without responsibility.
 When one group starts dominating and dictating the government, other pressure groups have
to bring counter pressure.