Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gentlemen :
This refers to your letter dated September 9, 2005 requesting for a ruling on
whether the tax exemption being enjoyed by the Philippine Amusement and Gaming
Corporation (PAGCOR) under Section 13 (2) (b) of Presidential Decree (PD) No.
1869 may be extended to your client by virtue of its Contract of Lease with the
former.
It can be seen here that RA 9337 omitted PAGCOR from the list of
government corporations that are exempt from income taxation under Section 27 of
the Tax Code of 1997. As a result, PAGCOR is now regarded as liable for income
taxes imposed on domestic corporations along with its 10% (now 12% starting
February 1, 2006) VAT liability under RA 7716. And since there is no longer any
income tax exemption to speak of, it follows that PAGCOR has no exemption
privileges to extend to Pacific Amusements under Section 13 (2) (b) of P.D. 1869.
Accordingly, this office is of the opinion that since there is no longer any basis
on PAGCOR's part to claim exemption from income taxes, it follows that Pacific
Amusements is taxable on income gained from its Contract of Lease with the former
starting November 1, 2005. In addition, all transactions entered into by your client as a
seller of goods and services or lessor of properties are subject to VAT.
This ruling is being issued on the basis of the foregoing facts as represented.
However, if upon investigation, it will be disclosed that the facts are different, then
this ruling shall be considered null and void. DacTEH
By: