Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Peroxidation, epoxidation, and/or perepoxidation reactions of soybean oil under air at room temperature
resulted in cross-linked polymeric soybean oil peroxides on the surface along with the waxy soluble part,
sPSB, with a molecular weight of 4690, containing up to 2.3 wt % peroxide. This soluble polymeric oil
peroxide, sPSB, initiated the free radical polymerization of either methyl methacrylate (MMA) or n-butyl
methacrylate (nBMA) to give PSB-g-PMMA and PSB-g-PnBMA graft copolymers. The polymers obtained
were characterized by 1H NMR, thermogravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, and gel
permeation chromatography techniques. Polymeric oil as a plasticizer lowered the glass transition of the
PSB-g-PMMA graft copolymers. PSB-g-PMMA and PSB-g-PnBMA graft copolymer film samples were
also used in cell culture studies. Fibroblast and macrophage cells were strongly adhered and spread on the
copolymer film surfaces, which is important in tissue engineering. Bacterial adhesion on PSB-g-PMMA
graft copolymer was also studied. Both Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli adhered on the
graft copolymer better than on homo-PMMA. Furthermore, the latter adhered much better than the former.
Table 1. Results and Conditions of the Polymerization and the Peroxidization of Soybean Oil
soybean polym total soluble peroxygen concn,
oil mass, time, yield, part concn, molecular weight (GPC) wt %, in
run g days g wt % Mw MWD soluble polymer
60-1 5.01 30 5.01 96 2.0
60-2 5.00 40 5.05 90 1887 1.26 2.1
60-3 5.25 50 5.25 93 2.3
60-4 5.21 60 5.21 86 4690 1.52 2.3
60-5 5.14 70 5.07 72 2.3
60-6 5.05 80 5.05 69 1.5
60-7 5.10 150 5.10 62 9428 2.38 1.3
and bacterial adhesion while maintaining the mechanical and freed from inhibitor by vacuum distillation over CaH2. All
physical properties of the underlying substrate.18 other chemicals were reagent grade and used as received.
In this work, as a cheap and abundant renewable source,
Formation of Polymeric Soybean Oil under Laboratory
soybean oil was converted to polymeric peroxide under
atmospheric conditions at room temperature. Then it was Conditions. For the formation of polymeric soybean oil, 5.0
used to initiate the graft copolymerization of MMA or n-butyl g of soybean oil spread out in a Petri dish (L ) 16 cm) was
methacrylate (nBMA) to obtain a new biodegradable mate- exposed to sunlight in the air at room temperature. After a
rial. These newly synthesized graft copolymers are tested given time, a gel polymer film associated with a waxy and
for their biocompatibilities and effects on bacterial adhe- viscous liquid was formed. Chloroform extraction of the
sion.19 crude polymeric oil for 24 h at room temperature allowed
separation of the soluble part of the polymeric soybean oil
Experimental Section (sPSB) from the gel (gPSB). The results and conditions of
Materials. Soybean oil was locally supplied and used as polymer formation from soybean oil are listed in Table 1.
received. MMA and nBMA were supplied from Aldrich and Peroxygen contents of the sPSB samples varied from 1.3 to
1752 Biomacromolecules, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2005 Çakmaklı et al.
Table 2. Results and Conditions for the Polymerization of MMA and nBMA Initiated by PSB (Sample 60-4 in Table 1) at 80 °C
polymer yield [PSB]a in
PSB MMA nBMA polym total, soluble, molecular weight copolymer,
run mass, g mass, g mass, g time, h g wt % Mw × 104 MWD mol %
56-1 1.015 0.562 4.5 0.80
56-3 1.000 1.030 5 0.84 67 31 1.6
56-4 1.000 2.012 5 1.47 76 35 1.6 4
56-2 1.031 3.005 4.5 2.93 53 30 1.8 6
56-5 1.501 3.005 5 3.37 80 8
56-6 3.003 3.005 5 4.72 79 40 1.2 12
61-1 0.926 2.42 6.5 2.57 43 29 1.7 4
62-1 0.51 2.42 8 1.15 20 52 1.6
62-2 1.03 2.42 8 1.54 48 44 1.5
62-3 2.03 2.42 8 2.52 78 41 1.7 4
62-4 3.01 2.42 8 3.31 36
a Calculated from their 1H NMR spectra (by comparison with peaks at 3.7 ppm (PMMA) and 4.2 ppm (PSB)).
already eliminated by staying in the solution during the g-PnBMA (run 62-3, γ ) 2.0-4.0) contained characteristic
precipitation procedure. peaks as indicated in Figure 3 (δ, ppm): -COOCH3 of
1H NMR spectra of the soluble copolymer samples of PSB-
nBMA at 4.0 (shifted to higher field than that of PMMA)
g-PMMA (run 56-6, γ ) 2.0-4.0) contained characteristic and -CH2- of SB at 2.8, 2.4, 1.9, 1.4, and 0.9; the peaks at
Synthesis of PSB-g-PMMA and PSB-g-PnBMA Copolymers Biomacromolecules, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2005 1755
Figure 7. L-929 cell growth and adhesion test on the polymer samples: (a) 1 h, (b) 16 h.
4.1-4.4 ppm originate from the protons in the methylene graft copolymers. Tg values of the graft copolymers were
groups of the triglyceride (which partially overlapped with around of that of homo-PnBMA. Figure 5 also indicates DSC
the peak of PnBMA at 4.0 ppm). The vinylic protons are traces of the polymers. Tg values of PSB were shifted to
detected at 5.3 ppm. higher values in PMMA graft copolymers, while they were
GPC was used to determine the molecular weights and not observed in PnBMA copolymers because the aliphatic
polydispersity of the copolymers. Fractionated samples of side chain of PnBMA may help the compatibilization of
PSB-g-PMMA and PSB-g-PnBMA gave unimodal traces polymeric oil. Figure 6 indicates the thermogravimetric traces
which can be attributed to the graft copolymer structure of sPSB, PnBMA, and soluble PnBMA-g-PSB graft copoly-
without homopolymer impurities (see Figure 4). mers. The first temperature region at around 130-280 °C
Thermal analysis of graft copolymers was performed by (stage I) is related to evaporation and decomposition of the
DSC and TGA. Table 3 lists the glass transition (Tg), melting unreacted free oil in the bulk polymer. It is interesting that
transition (Tm), and decomposition (Td) temperatures. Figure the TGA traces of the graft copolymers were in the middle
5 indicates the thermogravimetric traces of sPSB and soluble of the related homopolymers. When we compare the Td
PMMA-g-PSB graft copolymers. values of homo-PMMA and homo-PnBMA with the Td
A considerable plastization effect of polymeric oil in the values of the graft copolymer of soybean oil, the latter are
PMMA graft copolymers has been observed by lowering the shifted to higher values (see Table 3).
glass transition to 83 °C compared with 110 °C for homo- Cell Culture and Adhesion. We have chosen L-929 cells
PMMA. There is no big difference in the case of PnBMA as the fibroblast and RAW 264.7 cells as the macrophage
1756 Biomacromolecules, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2005 Çakmaklı et al.
Figure 8. RAW 264.7 growth and adhesion test on the polymer samples: (a) 1 h, (b) 16 h.
cell line. Figures 7 and 8 show L-929 fibroblast and RAW PMMA and PSB-g-PnBMA film samples, PMMA- and
264.7 macrophage cell adhesion and proliferation on homo- PnBMA-coated Petri dishes, and a standard PS Petri dish
copolymers and graft copolymers, respectively. PSB-g- set for the fibroblast cell culture and 62-2- and 62-3-coded
Synthesis of PSB-g-PMMA and PSB-g-PnBMA Copolymers Biomacromolecules, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2005 1757
Table 4. Adherence of Bacteria to PMMA and PSB-g-PMMA hydrophobic Enterococcus faecalis isolate in their study.26
Determined by Direct Counting of Viable Adherent Bacteria The development of surfaces that reduce adherence of
Released by Vortex Agitation ((CFUs/mL)/mm2)a
bacteria may have several applications, for instance on
polymer S. epidermidis E. coli
medical devices used in the urogenital tract, where catheter-
PMMA 46428 42857 associated infections are rampant and E. coli constitutes the
PSB-g-PMMA
most important causative organism for infection. According
56-2 39285 1250
to our results PSB-g-PMMA is a promising novel copolymer
56-5 28214 132
56-6 31321 892 of PMMA for use in medical devices, with the advantage of
decreasing bacterial adherence.
a The bacterial density ((CFUs/mL)/mm2) (CFUs ) colony-forming units)
was calculated by dividing the colony number mean by the total surface
area of the polymer disk. Conclusion
copolymers, PMMA- and PnBMA-coated Petri dishes, and Naturally peroxidized polymeric soybean oil as a macro-
a standard PS Petri dish set for the macrophage cell culture initiator initiates the free radical polymerization of MMA
were used. There were abundant spherical cells at the and nBMA, without any additional catalyst, which may be
beginning in all dishes (Figures 7a and 8a). In the first hour, important for medical applications of the graft copolymers.
L-929 cells in the copolymer 56-5 dish were adhered Soybean oil inclusion acts as a plasticizer and can make
significantly better than the other cells, and they turned into PMMA and PnBMA partially biodegradable and biocom-
their authentic shapes, except RAW cells on PnBMA. The patible. Fibroblast and macrophage cells strongly adhered
cell adhesion ability of RAW macrophages in PnBMA graft on the graft copolymers, especially PSB-g-PnBMA. Bacterial
copolymer (62-3) was found to be greater than that of the adherence to PSB-g-PMMA was found to be lower than that
others (Figure 8). These results were similar to those of the to PMMA.
standard PS dish.
After 16 h of incubation, the amounts of adhered L-929 Acknowledgment. This work was financially supported
(Figure 7b) and RAW (Figure 8b) cells were significantly by the Zonguldak Karaelmas University Research Fund.
increased for all polymeric surfaces. At this time, the amounts
References and Notes
of adhered L-929 cells in 56-5, 62-2, and 62-3 were found
to be greater than those of the others. The RAW cells did (1) Uyama, H.; Kuwabara, T.; Tsujimoto, T.; Kobayashi, S. Biomacro-
molecules 2003, 4, 211.
not have their own authentic shape on the PnBMA surface (2) Hazer, B. Chemical Modification of Synthetic and Biosynthetic
for 16 h. It is important that PnBMA-g-PSB is suitable for Polyesters. In Biopolymers; Steinbuchel, A., Ed.; Wiley-VCH:
macrophage growing and adhering while homo-PnBMA is Weinheim, Germany, 2003; Vol. 10, Chapter 6, pp 181-208.
(3) (a) Lenz, R. W. AdV. Polym. Sci. 1993, 1, 107. (b) Doi, Y. Microbial
not suitable. However, the macrophage cell adhesion ability Polyesters; VCH: New York, 1993. (c) Li, F.; Marks, D. W.; Larock,
in 62-3 was found to be greater than that of the others. It R. C.; Otaigbe, J. U. Polymer 2000, 41, 7925. (d) Yu, J.; Gao, J.;
was also observed that the macrophage cell adhesion ability Lin, T. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1996, 62, 1491.
(4) (a) Ashby, R. D.; Foglia, T. A. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1998,
in 62-2 was found to be higher than that of PnBMA. These 49, 431. (b) Hazer, B.; Torul, O.; Borcakli, M.; Lenz, R. W.; Fuller,
findings were similar to those of standard PS Petri dish usage R. C.; Goodwin, S. D. J. EnViron. Polym. Degrad. 1998, 6, 109. (c)
and supported the biocompatibility of the graft copolymers Eggink, G.; van der Wal, H. M.; Huijberts, G. N.; de Waard, P. P.
Ind. Crops and Prod. 1993, 1, 157. (d) van der Walle, G. A. M.;
obtained. Huisman, G. J. H.; Weusthuis, R. A.; Eggink, G. Int. J. Biol.
Bacterial Adhesion. Bacterial adhesion on any surface is Macromol. 1999, 25, 123. (e) Majid, M. I. A.; Hori, K.; Akiyama,
necessary for development of infection. Despite significant M.; Doi, Y. In Biodegradable Plastics and Polymers; Doi, Y.,
Fukuda, K., Eds.; Elsevier B.V.: Amsterdam, 1994; pp 417-424.
advances, bacterial adhesion to polymer surfaces is still a (5) (a) Li, F.; Hanson, M. V.; Larock, R. C. Polymer 2001, 42, 1567.
significant problem. There are many studies involved in (b) Li, F.; Parreroud, A.; Larock, R. C. Polymer 2001, 42, 10133.
bacterial adhesion on different polymer surfaces.23-25 (c) Li, F.; Larock, R. C. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2000, 78, 1044. (d) Li,
F.; Larock, R. C. J. Polym. Sci., B: Polym. Phys. 2001, 39, 60. (e)
In this study, the adherence of bacteria to copolymer Li, F.; Hanson, M. V.; Larock, R. C. Biomacromolecules 2003, 4,
PMMAs was compared with that of PMMA. While the 1018.
adherences of S. epidermidis and E. coli to PMMA disks (6) (a) Guner, F. S.; Usta, S.; Erciyes, A. T.; Yagci, Y. J. Coat. Technol.
2000, 72, 107. (b) Bunker, S. P.; Wool, R. P. J. Polym. Sci., A:
were similar, a significant decrease in the adherence of E. Polym. Chem. 2002, 40, 451.
coli to the PSB-PMMA graft was observed. The greatest (7) Domb, A. J.; Nudelman, R. J. Polym. Sci., A: Polym. Chem. 1995,
decrease (1/324) in the adherence of E. coli was observed 33, 717.
(8) Thames, S. H.; Yu, H.; Subramanian, R. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2000,
with 56-5 (Table 4). The adherence was 34 and 48 times 77, 8.
lower in 56-2 and 56-6, respectively. Although the decrease (9) Chen, J.; Soucek, M. D.; Simonsick, W. J.; Celikay, R. W. Polymer
in the adherence of S. epidermidis was far less than that of 2002, 43, 5379.
(10) Cakmakli, B.; Hazer, B.;, Tekin, I. Ö.; Kizgut, S.; Koksal, M.;
E. coli, there was a 1.1-, 1.6-, and 1.4-fold reduction in Menceloglu, Y. Macromol. Biosci. 2004, 4, 649-655.
adherence to PSB-g-PMMA graft copolymers 56-2, 56-5, (11) Tallman, K. A.; Roschek, B., Jr.; Porter, N. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
and 56-6, respectively. More significant reduction of adhe- 2004, 26, 9240.
(12) (a) Wold, C. R.; Soucek, M. D. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13, 3032. (b)
sion was observed with E. coli, especially to polymer 56-5. Wold, C. R.; Soucek, M. D. J. Coat. Technol. 1998, 70, 43.
Similary, Tunney et al. reported adhesion of the hydrophilic (13) Singleton, D. A.; Hang, C.; Szymanski, M. J.; Meyer, M. P.; Leach,
E. coli isolates to the copolymers increased with decreasing A. G.; Kuwata, K. T.; Chen, J. S.; Greer, A.; Foote, C. S.; Houk, K.
N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1319.
copolymer hydrophobicity. A relationship was not apparent (14) Ilter, S.; Hazer, B.; Borcakli, M.; Atici, O. Macromol. Chem. Phys.
between copolymer hydrophobicity and adherence of the 2001, 202, 2281.
1758 Biomacromolecules, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2005 Çakmaklı et al.
(15) Li, F.; Larock, R. C. J. Polym. Sci., B: Polym. Phys. 2000, 38, 2721. (22) Isenberg, H. D. Use of MacFarland Standards. Clinical Microbiology
(16) Satriano, C.; Carnazza, S.; Guglielmino, S.; Marletta, G. Nucl. Procedures Handbook; ASM: Washington, DC, 1992; Vol. 1.
Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., B 2003, 208, 287. (23) Speranza, G.; Gottardi, G.; Pederzolli, C.; Lunelli, L.; Canteri, R.;
(17) Panilaitis, A. B.; Altman, G. H.; Chen, J.; Jin, H.-J.; Karageorgiou, Pasquardini, L.; Carli, E.; Lui, A.; Maniglio, D.; Brugnara, M.;
V.; Kaplan, D. L. Biomaterials 2003, 24, 3079. Anderle, M. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 2029.
(18) Ishihara, K. Novel polymeric materials for obtaining bloodcompatible (24) Kodjikian, L.; Burillon, C.; Chanloy, C.; Bostvironnois, V.; Pellon,
surfaces. Trends Polym. Sci. 1997, 5, 401-7. G.; Mari, E.; Freney, J. Jean; Roger, T. InVest. Ophthalmol. Visual
(19) Langer, R.; Vacanti, J. P. Science 1993, 260, 920. Sci. 2002, 43 (12), 3717.
(20) Swern, D., Ed. Organic Peroxides; Wiley: New York, 1970; Vol. (25) Pinna, A.; Zanetti, S.; Sechi, L. A.; Usai, D.; Falchi, M. P.; Carta, F.
II. Ophthalmology 2000, 107, 1042.
(21) (a) Hazer, B.; Erdem, B.; Lenz, R. W. J. Polym. Sci., A: Polym. (26) Tunney, M. M.; Jones, D. S.; Gorman, S. P. Int. J. Pharm. 1997,
Chem. 1994, 32, 1739. (b) Hazer, B.; Baysal, B. M. Polymer 1986, 151, 121.
27, 961. (c) Wu, B.; Lenz, R. W.; Hazer, B. Macromolecules 1999,
32, 6856. BM050063F