Before the ACJM, District Court Complex Jhansi

Cri. Misc. Application No ………… of 2023

In re
Crim. Misc. Application No. 488/2023
In re;
Case Crime No.-20/23
U/s 420, 467,468,471 of IPC
PS Prem Nagar Jhans

Suraj Brajlal Chaudhary (In Jail) & Ors versus State of UP

Index
S.No Particulars Page Nos
1. Index
2. Application for Disposal of Application No. 488 of 2023
pending since 01.04.2023.

Dated 06.05.2023

(Anupam Verma)
Advocate
Counsel for the Applicants
+91 9005324470
 Before the ACJM, District Court Complex Jhansi
Cri. Misc. Application No ………… of 2023
In re
Crim. Misc. Application No. 488/2023
In re;
Case Crime No.-20/23
U/s 420, 467,468,471 of IPC
PS Prem Nagar Jhans

Suraj Brajlal Chaudhary (In Jail) & Ors versus State of UP

In the matter of ;

Suraj Braj Chaudhary aged about 67 Years S/o Late Braj Lal Chaudhary R/o
Shivaji Nagar Thana Nawabad District Jhansi. .Applicants.
VERSUS

State of U.P. …….Respondents.

APPLICATION FOR DISPOSAL OF APPLICATION
FILED U/S 173(8) OF CrPC PENDING SINCE
01.04.2023

1. That in the instant matter present application u/s 91 of

CrPC read with section 165 of Evidence act was filed with
the purpose as to what are the documentary evidences
against accused applicant on the basis of which he has been
implicated in the matter; more so in light of the fact that he
himself produced the documents showing the fact that he is
neither partner to MM Associates nor their representative.
These/documents/ evidences were required to file discharge
application as was clearly been humbly pleaded before the
court. Because of the hasty FIR and Charge Sheet before ths
court accused applicant has wrongly been arraigned as an
accused which is apparent from the documents itself. Reply
has been filed by the state even though disposal is pending
and this Hon’ble Court desired on its own the presence of
 IOs, Since the response has been filed it is therefore
present application may be decided without the further
appearance of the IOs. It is more disturbing from the order
of this Hon’ble Court observed that “…..किन्तु अभियुक्त के अधिवक्ता की ओर
से अन्य प्रकीर्ण वाद प्रस्तुत कर आरोप पर बहस हेतु समय की याचना की गयी जिसपर अभियुक्त के
अधिवक्ता आरोप पर बहस हेतु दिनांक 11.05.23 तक अवसर प्रदान किया गया |
2. That I as an advocate shocked beyond disbelief that I never intended to
linger on any proceedings in the matter rather requested any court to
decide application filed on the same date or immediately on the date
when reply from the state has been received. That in the present
application documents are speaking louder than volumes.

3. That be that as it may since the accused applicant is languishing in jail

and his fundamental rights are being violated from the records put forth
by the applicant it is apparent on the face of record that cognizance has
been taken by this Hon’ble Court without completing the investigation.
This Hon’ble Court is requested to hear and dispose of application today
so that necessary proceedings can be filed before this court for hearing on
charges as soon as applicant’s advocate receives a copy of order/
evidences as requested vide present application.

प्रार्थना
उपरोक्त के आधार पर इस माननीय न्यायलय से अनरु ोध हैकि –
i. Pending application u/s 173 (8) of CrPC may please be decided today.
ii. अन्य कोइ आदेश जो न्यायहित में हो पारित करने का कष्ट करे |

Dated 06.05.2023
(Anupam Verma)
Advocate
Counsel for the Applicants
+91 9005324470