Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MODULE 6B
Introduction
The Local Government Code of 1991 (RA 7190) provided for a more responsive
local government structure through a system of decentralization where local governments
are given more power, authority, responsibilities and resources. Likewise, with the
introduction of School-Based Management in Philippine schools, schools are given more
power to direct their affairs with the learning and development of learners as ultimate
goal.
In this learning material, you are expected to learn the rewards and challenges in
implementing SBM especially on the part of the school head. So, get your notebook again
and start scribbling important notes. Who knows, you will be the next school head who will
implement SBM!
Outcomes
At the end of the lesson, the students should have:
1. discussed the meaning of School-Based Management (SBM); and
2. evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of School-Based Management (SBM)
Warm Up Activity
Everybody, probably, has his/her own symbol of leadership. I would like you to
draw/prepare a drawing of an object that symbolizes a leader. Describe your symbol and
explain why you choose that symbol. Be ready to share this in class.
In general, SBM programs transfer authority over one or more of the following
activities: budget allocation, hiring and firing of teachers and other school staff, curriculum
development, textbook and other educational material procurement, infrastructure
improvement, setting the school calendar to better meet the specific needs of the local
community, and monitoring and evaluation of teacher performance and student learning
outcomes. SBM also includes school-development plans, school grants, and sometimes
information dissemination of educational results (otherwise known as ‘report cards’).
SBM is in keeping with the principle of subsidiarity which states that it is the people
at the lowest level who will know best their problems and so are in the best position to
address the same. This tenet holds that “nothing should be done by a large and more
complex organization which can be done as well by a smaller and simpler organization. In
other words, any activity which can be performed by a more decentralized entity should be
done by that more decentralized entity. Those in the higher echelon are far more removed
from the scene and are therefore not as involved and as informed as those from below.
Allow competent individuals in the schools to make decisions that will improve
learning;
Give the entire school community a voice in key decisions;
Focus accountability for decisions;
Lead to greater creativity in the design of programs;
Redirect resources to support the goals developed in each school;
Lead to realistic budgeting as parents and teachers become more aware of the
school’s financial status, spending limitations, and the cost of its programs; and,
Improve morale of teachers and nurture new leadership at all levels.
meeting the needs of students in the community. This results in a sense of community
school ownership which makes the school realize its vision and mission.
Through SBM, problems and needs at the school level get solved faster and specific
personalities and cultures are taken into consideration. These personalities and cultures are
usually ignored in multi-layered in hierarchical organization like DepEd. In a hierarchical
organization, straight jacket rules, procedures and allocation norms are given and apply to
all. It takes time to solve problems if schools have to wait answers from above. As a result,
teachers, parents and students are frustrated due to delays.
In SBM, schools take the responsibility to plan and implement their School
Improvement Plan (SIP). It is the school themselves, not DepEd higher offices that know best
their problems and the solutions to these problems. It is the schools that determine the
number and kind of teachers they need, the kind of learning materials and resources they
need.
Since schools are given more power to direct themselves, they are made
accountable for results. SBM makes schools accountable to the stakeholders.
Disadvantage of SBM
Participatory decision-making needs time and may slow down process
The Philippine Constitution provides that Congress shall enact a local government
code that will institutionalize a system of decentralization (Article 10, Section 3) whereby
local government units shall be extended more power, authority… The Local Government
Code in 1991 is a fulfillment of this Constitutional provision.
This means that long before the Department of Education (DepEd) legally introduced
decentralization in schools through SBM in 2001 through the enactment of RA 9155, local
government units were already empowered for local governance. RA 9155, Basic
Governance Act transfers the power and authority as well as the resources to the school-
level. School empowerment is based on the assumption that the school heads including
teachers, key leaders in the community, parents know best the root and solution to the
problem.
1. Teachers, school heads must be given the opportunity to make choices. They must
actively participate in school improvement planning.
2. The involvement of parents and teachers must be strongly encouraged and highly
welcomed.
3. Stakeholders must participate in the development of a School Improvement Plan
(SIP). They must have a say on resource allocation to meet specific needs.
4. Higher authorities must actively encourage thoughtful experimentation and
innovation in an atmosphere where mistakes are viewed as learning experiences.
They must be willing to share their authority with the academe and the larger
community.
5. Teachers must develop reflection and problem solving.
The success of SBM very much depends on the school head. Presented in the table
below are his/her functions:
*The School Improvement Plan (SIP) is a roadmap that lays down specific interventions that
a school, with the help of the community and other stakeholders, will undertake
within a period of three consecutive school years. The implementation of
development activities integral to it are in the school such as projects under the
Continuous Improvement Program (CIP), the creation and mobilization of Learning
Action Cells (LACs), and the preparation of the School Report Card (SRC). SIP seeks to
provide those involved in school planning an evidence-based, systematic approach
with the point of view of the learner as the starting point. Ultimately, it is envisioned
to help schools reach the goal of providing access to quality education.
DO 44, s. 2015 Guidelines on the Enhanced School Improvement Planning (SIP) Process &
the School Report Card (SRC) @ https://www.deped.gov.ph/2015/09/29/do-44-s-
2015-guidelines-on-the-enhanced-school-improvement-planning-sip-process-and-
the-school-report-card-src/
How Does School-Based Management (SBM) Affect The Roles Of The School Board And
The Superintendent And District Office?
The school board continues to establish a clear and unifying vision and to set broad
policies for the district and the schools. SBM does not change the legal governance system
of schools, and school boards do not give up authority by sharing authority. The board’s role
changes little in a conversion to SBM.
The superintendent and his or her district office staff facilitate the decisions made at
the school level and provide technical assistance when a school has difficulty translating the
district’s vision into high-quality programs. Developing student and staff performance
standards and evaluating the schools are also the responsibility of the district staff.
The district office will generally continue to recruit potential employees, screen job
applicants, and maintain information on qualified applicants from which the schools fill their
vacancies. The district office may also specify curricular goals, objectives, and expected
outcomes while leaving it up to the schools to determine the methods for producing the
desired results. Some districts leave the choice of instructional materials to the schools,
whereas others may require schools to use common texts.
In most SBM systems, each school is given a “lump sum” that the school can spend
as it sees fit. As outlined by JoAnn Spear (1983), the district office determines the total funds
needed by the whole district, determines the districtwide costs (such as the cost of central
administration and transportation), and allocates the remaining funds to the individual
schools. The allocation to each school is determined by a formula that takes into account
the number and type of students at that school.
Each school determines how to spend the lump sum allocated by the district in such
areas as personnel, equipment, supplies, and maintenance. In some districts, surplus funds
can be carried over to the next year or be shifted to a program that needs more funds; in
this way, long-range planning and efficiency are encouraged.
Most districts create school management councils at each school that include the
principal, representatives of parents and teachers, and, in some cases, other citizens,
support staff, and–at the secondary level–students. The council conducts a needs
assessment and develops a plan of action that includes statements of goals and measurable
objectives, consistent with school board policies.
Pilot test numbers of effective initiatives directly undertaken by the Target Access
Schools and Community Learning Centers to improve access.
Develop and pilot test support systems/mechanisms at the division level to render
direct technical assistance support to the Target Access Schools and Community
Learning Centers.
Develop and pilot test support systems/mechanisms at the regions to facilitate policy
compliance, effective programs delivery and ensure quality assurance and
accountabilities.
The UIS shall consist of integrated databases, automated processes and technologies
that are to be implemented on enhanced organizational structures and improved workflow
processes at the target divisions and regions.
Consistent with the overall strategy of building on existing DepED systems and
structures, the solution system aims to establish effective linkages with currently functional
systems
In summary:
SBM must have the strong support of school staff.
SBM is more successful if it is implemented gradually. It may take 5 years or more to
implement SBM.
School and district staff must be given administrative training, but also must learn
how to adjust to new roles and channels of communication.
Financial support must be provided to make training and time for regular staff
meetings available.
Central office administrators must transfer authority to principals, and principals in
turn must share this authority with teachers and parents.
Research findings point out to the following factors that spell school effectiveness:
1. Human Factors
These include a dynamic school head, highly selected competent and committed
teachers, highly motivated pupils/students with high expectations, and a supportive
community.
2. Non-Human Factors, Processes
These refer to clear and shared vision (focus), high expectations/ ambitious
standards, emphasis on accountability, aligned curriculum, instruction and
assessment with state/ DepEd standards, efficiency or optimal utilization of
These factors are exemplified by high performing schools in the Philippines and
abroad and by the best education performing countries in the world.
Congratulations for reaching this far! Now, let me see if you could perfect the
summary exercise below as a sign of your understanding the lecture notes given above.
19. An Annual Improvement Plan is made for the year by year SIP.
20. The formulation and implementation of the SIP shall involve the active participation
of all education stakeholders in the school only.
(Note: Submit your output titled Module 6B Outputs on or before May 15, 2023, during
our class.
References:
Llego, M. A. (20 ). A Comprehensive Guide to School-Based Management (SBM).
https://www.teacherph.com/a-comprehensive-guide-to-school-based-management-
sbm/
Prieto, N. G., Arcangel, C. N., and Corpuz, B. B. (2019). The Teacher and the Community,
School Culture and Organizational Leadership. LORIMAR Publishing, Inc. Cubao,
Quezon City.