Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Student’s name
Professor’s name
Course title
Date
Australia foreign policy white paper 2
with the international community. The white paper outlines key themes relating to
geopolitics, economics and other international agenda that directly affects the
Australians. The genesis of the paper stems from the coalition’s government clamor to
develop a new policy after re-election in 2016 (McDougall, 2018, p. 280). The white
paper addresses the potential issues that could arise in the Indo-Pacific region. At the
same time, the white paper highlights its commitment to promote a prosperous Indo-
Pacific region. Among the key themes is the maintenance of peace of within Australia
and in the region (McDougall, 2018, p. 280). Australia focuses on partnering with the
United States (USA) to promote peace and economic affairs. This paper will analyze
the strengths and weaknesses of the 2017 foreign policy white paper.
Strengths
domestic issues. The paper points out the risks of economic nationalism and
protectionism that could limit regional prosperity (Gyngel,2018, p.8).The 2017 policy
paper emphasizes on placing the country’s interest first over foreign input. The
investment proposals (2017 Foreign, 2017, p. 14). The Australian government values
skilled immigrant labor but will balance their interest with the country’s to ensure that
locals are employed. This measure ensures that ordinary citizens get jobs and
foreigners also have a chance to migrate into the county and contribute to the
economy. Jobs create wealth and helps people meet the cost of living (2017 Foreign,
2017, p. 14). Having a working nation avails goods and services to the people and
alternative ways to resolve conflicts that will not trigger a crisis. Australia recognizes
the potential of China to become a superpower in the future and have more influence
in the world. The paper calls for the easing of tension that could disrupt other global
trading activities (McDougall, 2018, p. 282). The role of other development partners
like Japan, Indonesia and India are recognized as beneficial to the country.In the
paper, Australia champions for the regulation of Chinese activities in the East China
sea and Taiwanese strip. The good relations fostered with China enables Australia to
engage in mutual investment projects (Medcalf, 2019, p.110).The paper aims at soft
balance where it maintains good relations with China and cooperates with the U.S on
prosperity to her people. Australia advocates for globalization and open international
economy free from tariffs and barriers (McDougall, 2018, p. 282).The country
Autralia has shown its commitment to global economy by entering into bilateral and
agreement with the United Kingdom (McDougall, 2018, p. 282). The trade
agreements offer opportunities for Australia to trade and create jobs for her people.
Security issues dominate the agenda on the white paper. Issues of terrorism
that have threatened not only Australia but also the global community. The paper
highlights the country’s commitment to obey international rules that supports the fight
Australia also purposes to cooperate with other nations to curb biosecurity issues
(Dixon,2017, p.278) . Australia champions for joint efforts to fight Islamic terrorism
in Asia by deploying its military to the troubled countries (Oliver, 2017, p. 13). The
policy however avoids waging war or engaging in military conflicts with China and
Russia.
Weaknesses
Australia’s emphasis of fostering ties with the U.S will be detrimental in the
long run when China takes over the global economy as a superpower. The U.S.A
power is declining globally and the paper does not put more emphasis on fostering
ties with Asian countries (Bateman, 2017, p.3). The paper recognizes that China is
likely to become a superpower but does not address how the country is prepared to
handle China (Reilly, 2020, p. 121). Australia’s skepticism about China’s activities is
bound to harm bilateral trade agreements between the two countries and Australia
stands to lose a trade partner. Australia foreign policy does not have a national
identity that it aligns with to help it develop its systems to be devoid of external
influence (Sanyal, 2019, p.3). To ease the tensions between China and the U.S, the
paper did not encourage cooperation and reconcilliation between the two to solve the
existing trade issues . The paper rides on hope that America will come to restore
Australia’s former glory (In Brief, 2017, p.1, ; Gyngel, 2018, p.7). The policy fails to
China has been working to restore stability in the Antarctic region but
Australia seems to sideline it and remain skeptical about its activities. Australia
should continue to work with China on Antarctic science and help the two countries
build trust (Liu, 2019, p. 127). The move could foster trust between the two countries.
The country has also side stepped the North Korea issue that could pause a serious
Australia foreign policy white paper 5
security threat to Australia should they choose to attack Australia. The paper openly
sidelines North Korea due to dangerous behavior. The new policy gives the U.S
military more access to the region (Bateman, 2017, p.3; Tidwell,2017,p.187). This
move could bring resentment from other countries and fuel regional tension.
In conclusion, the white paper’s strengths are based on the country’s desire to
improve the economy. Security issues have been addressed internally and externally .
Australia has demonstrated its commitment to collaborate with other nations through
trade treaties. However, the paper places too much emphasis on collaborating with
America despite its waning influence. The paper views events happening at South
China sea as problematic but does not recognize the efforts made to improve the
situation. The volatile situation between America and China could further jeopardize
References
https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/2017-foreign-policy-white-
paper.pdf
https://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/issue-white-paper/
Bateman, S., 2017. Australia’s Foreign Policy White Paper: Dealing with Uncertainty,
27.11. https://dr.ntu.edu.sg/bitstream/10356/86565/1/CO17225.pdf
Dixon, T., 2019. Mapping the potential impact of synthetic biology on Australian
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10357718.2019.1584154?
casa_token=efLiXuCBFV4AAAAA:XVAm3QfAGK70wICysMVZWvxuWl
VAOjvLcFUHdBPhnC0uHhcb8DHSHLEf-MpZm8-
kP03Hf0VK2A9W6FFOUw
Gyngell, A., 2018. The Uncertainty Principle: The 2017 Australian Foreign Policy
http://www.jstor.org/stable/26488485
Liu, N., 2019. The rise of China and the Antarctic treaty system?. Australian Journal
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/18366503.2019.1589897?
casa_token=7OBeHXT_vE8AAAAA:Bmt2afmBnO61A6EqU9QwO5Jk9K21
nb-hQnNHpVr-vT7yCHI8xDcKGMEmFB3jLNxemV-IJtp9uCcV0ajb
Australia foreign policy white paper 7
McDougall, D., 2018. Australia’s 2017 foreign policy white paper: Deconstruction
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00358533.2018.1476094?
casa_token=REN7ECDjk6wAAAAA:rXSG6OLyLdsIDlMYXNB3wO6EFOr
rHpMV2tQwOdq4A72cSAhEl2B7WVC9hYWG_SGkfvRCoeo_Y5TNRPEr
Medcalf, R., 2019. Australia and China: Understanding the reality check. Australian
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10357718.2018.1538315?
casa_token=-1_g9mZJvI0AAAAA:SUnJ2pndqIqjMLiNgiwBC54u5S_-
jDCZT1Dah3kx6G9CyF0JBNyfUok5Bw5568fAQKSJhzz3lVGvRGLyNQ
Oliver, A., 2017. 2017 Lowy Institute Poll: Understanding Australian Attitudes to the
World.
https://think-asia.org/handle/11540/7370
Reilly, B., 2020. The return of values in Australian foreign policy. Australian Journal
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10357718.2019.1693503?
casa_token=0GSrFD3mjf0AAAAA:DUUHInvfbXGcbIUTZrp4cqGvr1lKY7
DvDENXvuG0ZNYz8wmvQRxiSAFHVegaKcKTozpgfk9V56AVyhcfBw
Sanyal, J., 2019. Shaping Australian Foreign Policy in the 21st Century. Security
Challenges, 15(1), pp.1-8.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/26644514
Tidwell, A., 2017. The role of ‘diplomatic lobbying’in shaping US foreign policy and
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10357718.2016.1184620