This document compares and contrasts the advantages and disadvantages of case reports, case series, and cross-sectional studies. Case reports can identify rare disease manifestations but cannot assess cause and effect relationships or generalizability. Case series are informative for rare diseases but also cannot assess cause and effect. Cross-sectional studies allow measuring prevalence rates simply and at low cost but are not suitable for assessing temporal relationships or rare diseases.
This document compares and contrasts the advantages and disadvantages of case reports, case series, and cross-sectional studies. Case reports can identify rare disease manifestations but cannot assess cause and effect relationships or generalizability. Case series are informative for rare diseases but also cannot assess cause and effect. Cross-sectional studies allow measuring prevalence rates simply and at low cost but are not suitable for assessing temporal relationships or rare diseases.
This document compares and contrasts the advantages and disadvantages of case reports, case series, and cross-sectional studies. Case reports can identify rare disease manifestations but cannot assess cause and effect relationships or generalizability. Case series are informative for rare diseases but also cannot assess cause and effect. Cross-sectional studies allow measuring prevalence rates simply and at low cost but are not suitable for assessing temporal relationships or rare diseases.
1- Observational and educational 1- Can't study cause, effect
relationship 2- Easy to do (fast and no financial Case support support) 2- findings can't be generalized
Report 3- Identify rare manifestations of a
disease or drug
1- Useful for hypotheses Can't study cause, effect relationship
Case generation Can't asses disease prevalence series 2- Informative for rare diseases with few established risk factors
3- Characterizes averages for
disorders(i.e. the number and percentages of different characters , symptoms and signs among cases) 1. Simple to carry out Not appropriate to study rare Cross- diseases or events with short sectional 2. Short period of time duration Study 3. The prevalence rate can be 2. Not appropriate for assessing the Measured temporal relationship between exposure and a health event or 4. Low cost outcome: Egg or chicken dilemma; what is cause and what is effect. E.g. coronary heart disease and 5. Generalization of the results depressive disorders. With representative sample 3. Not suitable For rare diseases or acute (short duration)