Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Manufacturing
Engineering
Assignment 2A
Squeeze Casting
Vacuum Permanent-Mold
Casting
Yuvraj Tyagi
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to choose an Aluminium alloy and two appropriate
manufacturing methods to produce 1000 gearbox covers. The chosen manufacturing
technology is casting because of its flexibility, and the two casting techniques selected are
Squeeze Casting and Vacuum Permanent-Mold Casting, both of which are Multiple-Use
Mold Casting processes. The material selected for the gearbox cover is Aluminium A360, a
commonly used alloy with excellent castability, high tensile strength, good fatigue properties,
and sufficient corrosion resistance.
This report provides a detailed analysis of the material selection, process parameters such as
gate area and die clamping force, tooling setup, and advantages of each process. Finally, a
comparison is made between the two casting techniques to determine which is more suitable
for manufacturing the 1000 gearbox covers.
INTRODUCTION
The process of manufacturing involves the creation of finished goods using raw materials,
tools, and machines. To produce 1000 Gearbox Covers, it is essential to select a
manufacturing process that can meet all of the functional requirements of the product.
Different manufacturing techniques such as casting, metal forming, and powder metallurgy
are available, each with their unique advantages and limitations. However, the selection of
the most appropriate material and manufacturing process must consider factors such as
precision, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness.
Fig 1. Gearbox Cover CAD model Fig 2. Rendered image of joined Gearbox
The ideal combination of material and manufacturing process that can meet the functional
requirements of the Gearbox Cover with the highest degree of precision, efficiency, and cost-
effectiveness must be identified. This report aims to evaluate the different manufacturing
processes and select the best material and manufacturing method to produce 1000 Gearbox
Covers. The report will provide a detailed analysis of the material selection and
manufacturing process, including process parameters such as gate area and die clamping
force, tooling setup, and the advantages of each process. Ultimately, the report will conclude
with a comparison of the selected manufacturing techniques to determine the most suitable
method for producing the 1000 Gearbox Covers.
Material Selection
The best candidate, from an engineering standpoint, would be the material that offers more
desirable mechanical properties, as demanded by the functions of the Gearbox Cover.
Another crucial factor for the material selection is which material is more suitable for the
chosen manufacturing methods, which in this case are Squeeze Casting and Vacuum
Permanent-Mold Casting.
Aluminium A360 is a highly suitable material for the production of Gearbox covers, offering
a range of advantageous properties[1]. Due to its excellent castability, it is widely used in
various casting processes. Its low melting point and good fluidity facilitate the casting of
complex shapes, such as those required for Gearbox covers that feature hollow sections. The
low shrinkage characteristics of Aluminium A360 prevent deformation and cracking during
the casting process, further enhancing its appeal.
The alloy is also characterized by high tensile strength, good fatigue properties, and sufficient
levels of corrosion resistance, which are all essential for Gearbox covers. The high tensile
strength ensures that the covers can withstand the required load and torque, while its good
fatigue properties enable them to withstand repeated cycles of stress and strain. The silicon
content of Aluminium A360 enhances its mechanical properties by making it highly resistant
to hot cracking during casting. It also improves its wear resistance and decreases its
coefficient of thermal expansion.
The low iron content of Aluminium A360 provides excellent resistance to high-temperature
heat treatment, which is a crucial factor in the manufacturing process. In summary, the
desirable characteristics and properties of Aluminium A360 make it an excellent material for
the production of Gearbox covers, providing reliability and durability in this application.
Between these two materials, Magnesium is lighter, has better machinability, and boasts of a
higher strength-to-weight ratio. However, for load-bearing applications, Aluminium is more
widely used, because it has a higher modulus of elasticity, along with having better wear and
fatigue characteristics.
Manufacturing Process
The Squeeze Casting process involves a series of steps that are carried out in the following
order:
1. Fabrication of upper and lower dies: The upper and lower dies are fabricated, and the
mold cavity and gating system are machined inside them. A hydraulic press is
attached to the upper die.
2. Heating of Aluminium A360: Aluminium A360 is heated inside the furnace to the
required melt temperature needed for the casting operation.
3. Transfer of molten contents: The ladle picks up the molten contents from the furnace
and carries the molten alloy to the shot sleeve.
4. Injection of molten Aluminium A360: The shot sleeve is tilted, and the ladle pours the
molten alloy in it. The plunger inside the shot sleeve injects the molten Aluminium
A360 in the mold cavity of the bottom die at a pre-set pressure value. The shot sleeve
then regains its vertical position and the plunger retreats.
5. Lowering of upper die: The upper die is then lowered down to the bottom die, until
both the mold cavities are touching one another at the parting line.
6. Application of pressure: Pressure is then applied on the upper die by the hydraulic
press. This pressure squeezes the upper die into the liquid pool of molten Aluminium
A360. The molten liquid then fills up the mold cavity of the upper die.
7. Maintenance of pressure: The pressure being applied by the hydraulic press is
maintained until the complete solidification of the molten A360 is achieved.
8. Release of pressure: The pressure is released, and the upper die is then retracted back
to its original position.
9. Extraction of finished cast: The finished cast is extracted from the bottom die using
the ejector pin or rods.
10. Cleaning of dies: The mold cavity and gating system in both the dies is cleaned for the
next casting operation.
11. Repeat: The entire process is then repeated for the next casting operation.
Fig 4: Schematic of the Squeeze Casting process [6]
Manufacturing Process
The Vacuum Permanent-Mold Casting process involves a series of steps for the
manufacturing process, which are as follows:
1. The upper and lower dies are created, with the mold cavity and gating system
machined inside. A hydraulic press is then connected to the upper die.
2. The Aluminium A360 is heated in a furnace to achieve the necessary melt
temperature required for the casting process. The molten metal is stored in a crucible,
which is located in a sealed chamber at the bottom of the machine setup.
3. The casting process is initiated when the upper die is lowered down to the lower die,
bringing both the mold cavities into contact at the parting line.
4. Pressure is applied to the upper die through the hydraulic press, clamping the two dies
together and tightly sealing the mold cavity.
5. A vacuum is created on the upper half of the die assembly, which establishes a
pressure differential between it and the molten metal pool located in the chamber
below.
6. The molten metal flows from the crucible to the mold cavity through a feed tube due
to the pressure differential.
7. The molten metal fills up the mold cavity from the top down, with the vacuum being
maintained until solidification occurs.
8. Once the solidification of the molten metal is complete, the pressure differential is
released by retracting the upper die, which carries the casting with it
9. The casting is then held in the upper die cavity for a certain period of time to cool
down, after which it is removed using ejector pins.
10. The mold cavity and gating system in both the dies are cleaned for the next casting
operation, and the process is repeated.
ANALYSIS
Squeeze Casting and Vacuum Permanent-Mold Casting are two popular techniques used to
manufacture high-quality aluminium alloy castings such as gearbox covers. Both methods
involve the use of an upper die that exerts high clamping force on the molten metal inside the
die cavity to achieve a rapid solidification process, leading to enhanced mechanical properties
and minimal defects. The clamping force of the die is a critical parameter for both processes,
which can be calculated based on certain process parameters.
In this report, we have performed a comparative analysis of the Squeeze Casting and Vacuum
Permanent-Mold Casting processes to determine important process parameters required to
manufacture an Aluminium A360 Gearbox Cover. Firstly, we calculated the clamping force
of the die for the Squeeze Casting process, which involved the injection force applied by the
plunger in the shot sleeve injector and the metal casting pressure in the die cavity. Using
geometrical dimensions given for the Gearbox Cover in the CAD design, we computed the
volume of molten metal required for casting and projected casting area. Based on these
parameters and literature available on Squeeze Casting of Aluminium alloys, we arrived at a
metal casting pressure of 173 MPa and die clamping force of 13.78 × 𝟏𝟎𝟔 N for the
Squeeze Casting process.
Secondly, we calculated the gate area for both processes, which is an essential parameter for
the casting process. The gate area must be large enough to freeze only after the solidification
is completed in the mold cavity, so additional molten metal can be fed to the casting where
the solidification shrinkage has occurred. For this, we assumed reasonable values for certain
parameters like gate velocity and filling time based on literature available. We found that the
Gate area for the Squeeze Casting process was 0.00024 m2, while for the Vacuum
Permanent-Mold Casting process, it was 0.00016 m2.
The results showed that the Squeeze Casting process requires a somewhat larger gate area to
minimize the turbulence of the molten metal injected from the shot sleeve into the die cavity.
In contrast, flow turbulence is not a significant problem for the Vacuum Permanent-Mold
Casting process. These process parameters are critical for achieving high-quality aluminium
alloy castings with minimal defects. In the Squeeze Casting process, the retractable upper die
is made to clamp down on the lower die through the use of a hydraulic press. This leads to
high pressure values being created inside the die cavity, where the molten metal is sitting. It
is through these high-pressure values that the molten metal is rapidly solidified, leading to the
casting exhibiting enhanced mechanical properties and minimal defects. In the Vacuum
Permanent-Mold Casting process too, the upper die works in a similar fashion, although the
method of injecting the molten metal into the die cavity is different. Nevertheless, the
“clamping force of the die” is a critical parameter in both the processes.
The calculations are shown in Appendix of this report.
The designed model of jig consists of 4 jaws which are designed in such a way that the
contact patch with the gearbox cover is minimized, so that surface finish is not
compromised while drilling operation. These jaws are movable and can be fixed at a
point, which in then provides stability to the Gearbox cover.
Surface Coating
Powder coating is a surface finishing technique that is widely used for coating gearbox
covers. This process involves applying a fine powder made of thermoplastic or thermoset
polymer to the surface of the cover using an electrostatic charge. The powder adheres to the
metal surface of the cover and is then heated in an oven, melting the powder and creating a
smooth and durable coating [9].
There are several advantages to using powder coating for gearbox covers. The foremost
advantage is its exceptional durability. Powder coatings offer excellent resistance to
scratches, chips, and other types of damage, making them a perfect choice for gearbox
covers that are frequently exposed to harsh environments and rough handling.
CONCLUSION
The Gearbox Cover has been produced through two different casting processes, namely
Squeeze Casting and Vacuum Permanent-Mold Casting, both of which offer excellent surface
finish and high as-cast strength for the casting. However, the setup cost for these processes is
considerably high as the die cavities need to be specifically machined for a particular product
and cannot be used for any other. As a result, these high operational costs can only be
justified when a high number of products are being manufactured. For the current objective
of producing 1000 Gearbox Covers, the selection of these two processes was primarily based
on this criterion.
Comparing the two casting processes, the Vacuum Permanent-Mold Casting process is more
beneficial in terms of surface finish as the molten metal never comes in contact with the
atmosphere, which results in negligible gas porosity in the casting. Additionally, the molten
metal in the Vacuum Permanent-Mold Casting process enters the cavity due to a pressure
differential between it and the die assembly, which minimizes turbulence in the flow and
contributes to an overall smoother finish. On the other hand, the molten metal in the Squeeze
Casting process is injected via a shot sleeve injector, which can lead to higher turbulence in
the flow and, therefore, a lower surface finish. Thus, for obtaining a higher quality of
surface finish, the Vacuum Permanent-Mold Casting process is a better option than
Squeeze Casting.
The Vacuum Permanent-Mold Casting process also offers enhanced mechanical properties of
the casting compared to the Squeeze Casting process. This is because directional
solidification of the molten metal occurs in the Vacuum Permanent-Mold Casting process,
leading to better mechanical properties. However, directional solidification may not occur in
the Squeeze Casting process, which primarily relies on rapid freezing of the molten metal. As
a result, the Vacuum Permanent-Mold Casting process is a preferred option for achieving
better mechanical properties in the casting.
It should be noted that the overall cost of operation and production time for the Vacuum
Permanent-Mold Casting process is higher than that of the Squeeze Casting process.
However, since the Gearbox Cover is a crucial component, whose failure can lead to
catastrophic consequences for the entire mechanical assembly, the Vacuum Permanent-Mold
Casting process should be chosen from an engineering standpoint.
REFERENCES
[1] A360 aluminum properties: Die cast materials (no date) Dynacast. Available at:
https://www.dynacast.com/en/knowledge-center/material-information/aluminum-die-
castingmetals/a360#:~:text=A360%20is%20an%20aluminum%20alloy,strength%2C%20
even%20in%20elevated%20temperatures. (Accessed: 10 May 2023).
[2] Aluminum A360.0-F die casting alloy. Available at:
https://www.matweb.com/search/DataSheet.aspx?MatGUID=87a0d0817ebd44008a967cb
f3e9cd378 (Accessed: 10 May 2023).
[3] Chapter 13: Multiple-use-mold casting processes DeGarmo’s materials and processes in
manufacturing - vdocument.in. Available at: https://vdocument.in/chapter-13-multiple-
use-mold-casting-processes-degarmos-materials-and-processes.html (Accessed: 10
May 2023).
[4] Schwam D, Wallace FJ, Chang Q, Qingming, Zhu Y. Optimization of Squeeze Casting
for Alumnium Alloy Parts. 2002 https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/801193
[5] http://zhangjun.ca/DeGarmo's%20Materials%20and%20Process%2011th.pdf
[6] https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0924013699002915-gr2.jpg
[7] Arnold, T. F., Krubsack, W. L. Mechanical Properties/High Ductility from Alumnium
Permanent Mold Castings. SAE Transactions. 1986; 95, 543–549.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/44725406
[8] World-class vacuum die casting service - inox casting (2022) Inox Cast. Available at:
https://www.inoxcast.com/vacuum-die-casting/ (Accessed: 10 May 2023).
[9] Nagato, T. et al. (2010) ‘Study of design and optimization of tablet coating process by
Taguchi method’, Journal of the Society of Powder Technology, Japan, 47(6), pp. 394–
401. doi:10.4164/sptj.47.394.
APPENDIX
1. Calculations of the die clamping force for the Squeeze Casting process:
Fig 9: Calculation of “injection force” and “metal casting pressure” for the Squeeze Casting
process
Fig 10: Calculation of the “Die Clamping Force” for the Squeeze Casting process and
Vacuum Permanent Die Casting process
2. Calculation of Gate area for Squeeze Casting process
Fig 11: Calculating the “Gate Area” for the Squeeze Casting process
3. Calculation of the gate area for the Vacuum Permanent-Mold Casting process:
Fig 12: Calculating the “Gate Area” for the Vacuum Permanent-Mold Casting process