Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A strategic vision describes management’s aspirations for the company’s future and the course and direction charted
to achieve them.
A Strategic Vision + Mission + Objectives + Strategy = A Strategic Plan
Types of KPIs:
Key performance indicators come in many flavors. While some are used to measure monthly progress against a goal,
others have a longer-term focus. The one thing all KPIs have in common is that they’re tied to strategic goals. Here’s
an overview of some of the most common types of KPIs.
Strategic: These big-picture key performance indicators monitor organizational goals. Executives typically
look to one or two strategic KPIs to find out how the organization is doing at any given time. Examples include
return on investment, revenue and market share.
Operational: These KPIs typically measure performance in a shorter time frame, and are focused on
organizational processes and efficiencies. Some examples include sales by region, average monthly
transportation costs and cost per acquisition (CPA).
Functional Unit: Many key performance indicators are tied to specific functions, such finance or IT. While IT
might track time to resolution or average uptime, finance KPIs track gross profit margin or return on assets.
These functional KPIs can also be classified as strategic or operational.
Leading vs Lagging: Regardless of the type of key performance indicator you define, you should know the
difference between leading indicators and lagging indicators. While leading KPIs can help predict outcomes,
lagging KPIs track what has already happened. Organizations use a mix of both to ensure they’re tracking
what’s most important.
C: Learn about the role of strategic management in various sectors. They are:
1. Production/Operations
2. Role of Strategic Management in Marketing
3. Finance
4. Human Resource
5. Global Competitiveness
The significant feature is the belief that successful strategy involves the business adapting to its environment.
The positioning view will be seen in this text in the work of Michael Porter (notably his five forces model of industries
and his three generic competitive strategies) and in the sections dealing with marketing.
No writer will seriously question the need for successful products and good relations in assisting in making a firm
successful from one year to the next. However, the positioning approach has been criticised as inadequate as an
approach to sustainable success over decades with particular regard to the following.
Product life-cycle means particular products will become obsolete so today's successful market position will
become a liability in the future. For example, Levi Strauss jeans and apparel have declined in popularity since
they were immensely successful in the 1960's and 1970's.
Stakeholder groups, such as political parties, will decline in influence so relations with them will not sustain the
firm.
Long-term technological changes will eliminate cost advantages or technical superiority of a given product.
Perpetual change of the organization’s skills base and products will be disruptive and eventually leads the firm into
fields in which it has little expertise.
Fit Resources must be available to fit with the current product-market demands and current needs.
This means being at the leading/shaping edge of new strategic developments in the industry. This
Stretch suggests that the organization’s ambitions cannot be met with current resources and competences.
Ambition should outpace resources.
Leverage Existing resources are used in many different ways, so that extra value is extracted from them.
According to the resource-based view of strategy the role of resources is more than simply to execute strategies
determined by desired positions in product markets. Rather, the focus of the strategist should be on resources and
competences. These are assets for the long term. Such a combination of resources and competences takes years to
develop and can be hard to copy.
Some of the implications are explained in the table below.
Short run/long run trade off: Managers and businesses are frequently evaluated on short term successes such as
profits. Strategic thinking requires that managers consider the long term growth and survival of the business.
Therefore, management is required to balance short and long term considerations.