The document discusses the need for a systematic classification of risk perspectives in order to better understand how risk is perceived differently across communities, professions, and cultures. It states that risk means different things to different stakeholders and varies depending on factors like geography and intent. A broad classification is required to provide a basic understanding of these differences and allow for comparison and communication across groups. Not considering other risk perspectives can limit understanding of risk in complex environments where economics, safety, health and other issues intersect.
The document discusses the need for a systematic classification of risk perspectives in order to better understand how risk is perceived differently across communities, professions, and cultures. It states that risk means different things to different stakeholders and varies depending on factors like geography and intent. A broad classification is required to provide a basic understanding of these differences and allow for comparison and communication across groups. Not considering other risk perspectives can limit understanding of risk in complex environments where economics, safety, health and other issues intersect.
The document discusses the need for a systematic classification of risk perspectives in order to better understand how risk is perceived differently across communities, professions, and cultures. It states that risk means different things to different stakeholders and varies depending on factors like geography and intent. A broad classification is required to provide a basic understanding of these differences and allow for comparison and communication across groups. Not considering other risk perspectives can limit understanding of risk in complex environments where economics, safety, health and other issues intersect.
Risk, Security, Safety, Resilience & Management Sciences (Applied) www.risk-management.au Risk and how it is perceived is unevenly distributed across communities, professions and disciplines. Moreover, risk is not only socially constructed but also socially influenced, including amplification.
As a result, a broad classification of
what risk means to various stakeholders is required as a basic foundational understanding.
In other words, if you don't have a sense
or view of how risk may vary across individuals and groups, you really don't have an adequate understanding of risk within organisations or society. Tony Ridley MSc CSyP CAS FSyl Risk, Security, Safety, Resilience & Management Sciences (Applied) www.risk-management.au In particular, insurance, health, environmental protection, safety engineering, decision-making (psychology and economics) and policy makers/governments all have varying perspectives and competing priorities when it comes to the management, messaging and understanding of risk. Moreover, this varies yet again from geography-to-geography and culture-to- culture.
No only does risk vary across cohorts but
it is also stratified from social intent, methodologies, base units and what might be considered as 'the basic problem area'.
Tony Ridley MSc CSyP CAS FSyl
Risk, Security, Safety, Resilience & Management Sciences (Applied) www.risk-management.au In short, the meaning, practice and application of matters related to risk are inconsistent and required basic scaffolding for comparison and communication across groups.
Tony Ridley MSc CSyP CAS FSyl
Risk, Security, Safety, Resilience & Management Sciences (Applied) www.risk-management.au A lack of placement on any risk classification or inadequate consideration of risk beyond one's understanding and practices is inherently limited and concerningly incomplete.
Especially where risk is present in complex,
hybrid environments involving economics, health, safety, security and society.
Of particular note are the dominant risk
methods in various professions and disciplines. These practices, combined with base units, may be incompatible or yield differing results and measurements the require interpretation, integration and aggregation.
Tony Ridley MSc CSyP CAS FSyl
Risk, Security, Safety, Resilience & Management Sciences (Applied) www.risk-management.au In short, not only is it a matter of comparing 'apples and oranges' but what is an entire ecosystem of fruits, vegetables and meats.
That is, risk perspective
sections and segmentations are not organically nor naturally similar or even related.
Tony Ridley MSc CSyP CAS FSyl
Risk, Security, Safety, Resilience & Management Sciences (Applied) www.risk-management.au In short, risk is perceived differently by various professions, practitioners and disciplines, in addition to society and governments. As a result, matters related to risk always require broader consideration as to its specific location within and across professions or communities. Moreover, lack of consideration or awareness of risk as a complex, contested and inconsistent expression results in narrow risk narratives ill-suited for the real world and complex, networked world we all live in. The accompanying taxonomy and typology offers a start point for awareness, comparison and analysis.