The document summarizes a research study that analyzed the design sketches of architects and students to understand how they perceive information. The study developed categories to code the contents of participant protocols. It found that architects had more and longer periods of focused attention on a topic than students, suggesting architects thought more deeply whenever they changed focus. The study also identified the types of information that architects and students predominantly focused on during shifts in attention and sustained attention. Architects were better able to focus on visual attributes like shapes and angles during shifts in focus, making their shifts more productive. Architects were also able to pursue design ideas more thoroughly during sustained focus because they could identify more functional relationships in the sketches.
The document summarizes a research study that analyzed the design sketches of architects and students to understand how they perceive information. The study developed categories to code the contents of participant protocols. It found that architects had more and longer periods of focused attention on a topic than students, suggesting architects thought more deeply whenever they changed focus. The study also identified the types of information that architects and students predominantly focused on during shifts in attention and sustained attention. Architects were better able to focus on visual attributes like shapes and angles during shifts in focus, making their shifts more productive. Architects were also able to pursue design ideas more thoroughly during sustained focus because they could identify more functional relationships in the sketches.
The document summarizes a research study that analyzed the design sketches of architects and students to understand how they perceive information. The study developed categories to code the contents of participant protocols. It found that architects had more and longer periods of focused attention on a topic than students, suggesting architects thought more deeply whenever they changed focus. The study also identified the types of information that architects and students predominantly focused on during shifts in attention and sustained attention. Architects were better able to focus on visual attributes like shapes and angles during shifts in focus, making their shifts more productive. Architects were also able to pursue design ideas more thoroughly during sustained focus because they could identify more functional relationships in the sketches.
Faculty: Architecture Response paper What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis.
The creation of a set of information categories into which the contents of
participant protocols can be inserted was one of the study's primary objectives. It was developed from a cognitive science standpoint, particularly from studies on diagrammatic reasoning. The fact that architects had more and longer dependence chunks than students, according to the research, suggests that whenever architects changed their attentional focus, they thought more deeply about the subject. The study of information categories that predominate in or are characteristic of focus- shift segments and continuing segments is another contribution of the current research. Because architects are better able to think of shapes, angles, and sizes, which are intrinsically visual attributes of depictions, just after they shift their focus to a new item, space, or topic, their focus shifts are more productive. Additionally, it was discovered that architects are able to pursue design ideas more thoroughly both within and across dependency chunks because they are able to "read-off" many more functional relations in continuing segments, especially abstract features and reactions, from perceptions of depicted elements.
why are sketches a good medium for reflective conversation with
one's own ideas and imagery? why do architects have more and longer dependency chunks than students?