Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Brepols is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Viking and
Medieval Scandinavia
David Clark
TT 'Y^vam^ advises one not to trust 'Bróãurbana sínom, ķott á brauto mœti'
Ē m (st. 89) (A brother's killer, though one meet him on the road), and
JL JL Vçluspá even links fratricide with Ragnarçk, prophesying 'BroeÒr muno
beriaz oc at bçnom veròaz' (st. 45) (Brothers will fight each other and become one
another's slayer).1 However, kin-slaying and especially fratricide constitute crucial
factors in the history of both gods and men, recurring throughout the Codex Regius,
but particularly prominent in Vqluspá and HamÒismâl , respectively the first and last
poems of the compilation.2 In this article I first explore the treatment of these themes
in the two texts and the way in both that these themes interact with the use of cer-
tain shared motifs, and follow it with an exploration of the references to Ragnarçk
and these same motifs in the heroic poems, in particular the poems of Sigurär's
youth. In Vqluspá , these motifs are all linked with Ragnarçk, the doom of the gods,
and the end of the world; in HamÒismâl they are linked with the end of a human
dynasty. I argue that the poet of the latter may have been alluding to the cosmic
struggle as a means of warning his contemporaries of the dire consequences of kin-
slaying, but that within the context of the compilation we are encouraged to ex-
tend this to the consequences of strife within the community in general.
1 For consistency, poems are cited from Neckel and Kuhn (1962-68); emendations adopted
from Dronke (1969 and 1997) are indicated where appropriate. All translations are my own. I
would like to thank the following scholars for commenting on this article in earlier forms: Heather
O'Donoghue, Carl Phelpstead, Carolyne Larrington, and Judy Quinn. I benefitted greatly from
their comments and those of the anonymous reviewer of VMS. What faults remain are my own.
2 For a detailed account of the Codex Regius, see Lindblad (1954); for a facsimile with full
description, see Wimmer and Finnur Jónsson (1891).
As Dronke rem
rial with much
to make defini
tained in the l
Regius was not
the manuscrip
piler was work
lynchpin of th
tion took its c
1270, and it h
poems must ha
that the lost e
unlikely to hav
composition o
teenth century
and the copy t
the present fo
the poems' lost
the compilatio
tions, and the
Ragnarçk in
In Vqluspâ 3 1-
gods in Vçlusp
3 Compare the r
AM 748 I 4to co
drawn ar, and pa
Jónsson ( 1 896) f
5 See further D
6 For a lucid acco
see Millett (1994
7 The allusions a
Sn^rri Sturluson
the extant eddic
thirteenth-centu
in Norse (and Ol
over periods of
ished but lurkin
at the end of th
tance of fratric
themes in the f
HamÒismãl com
Vçlsung dynast
Helgi Hundings
are followed by
rise to fame, an
Brynhildr and G
ing poems largel
by her second
children, and th
It is thus alread
ated with venge
concerns come
compilation - fo
GuÒrúnarhvQt.
could thus serve
to end her life o
a satisfying tra
is surely theref
themes. I have
where, in an ar
Guòrún and her
However, I want
The plot essen
Guòrún incites h
whom he had m
GuÒrúnarhvqt i
vér to have had
Svanhildr in thi
10 It seems likely
term systor son 'si
Randvér's stepmot
undercuts the
foregrounding
inevitably still
One might co
grœnlenzku , w
has all the pow
í kné gengr hn
tré tccr at hn
This translatio
commentary (
'king-piece' in t
the expression
game, speculati
hence familiarl
a rare sense wo
(1969, 134). Us
itself was origi
some other par
both meanings
í kné gengr hn
have been trac
stanza. Secondly
Guäriin's iron
position, but of
pieces' fall. One
gaming pieces w
of their tragic
The irony of
avenged herself
flesh and drink
doubly ironic,
killed her sons
12 To this lament
lauf sé' (as little as
The events o
Rather than Vq
culminates in
destroys the c
human level ho
tives of a dyn
avenge their si
involved in the
seems consume
erally consume
her sons off to
is burnt out by
might even b
Ragnarçk ( Vql
be linked to th
and branch im
might also com
tletoe from wh
to the tree (pr
in Hávamál 1 3
in HamÒismál
qnnor 12, whe
it would be bet
viď (st. 12) (des
The idea that
be seen as in so
support in Grí
Ascr Yggdrasi
enn ScíÒblacJ
Óčlinn ása, en
Bilrçst brúa,
Hábróc hauca
15 Compare also Hãvamãl 85, Reginsmál 22, and the remarks immediately below.
mound, Sigrún
(st. 50) (where
these images a
of revenge.
Just as in the
situation (Helg
22, as Hallberg
destruction o
dreams of Gun
Atli:
Gçrvan hugda
aeti ļ>ic orma
gorÕiz rçc ra
(I thought I saw
you from life -
The Ragnarçk
of hanging on
ormar can allu
but also perhap
battle ( Vqlus
Haraldur Bess
ing that by th
argues could 'f
intended to ma
ragnarök [. . .]
Gudrún's reven
If this is the c
author o îAtla
earlier Atlakvi
In Fáfriismál
many element
explored wha
motiver' (1981
in Fáfriismál
18 Hallberg does
Although it is
elaboration, n
Sigurör's dea
remainder of
of Gudrun an
Baldr, Sigurär
ļ oc haestr bo
highest born
Grípisspã, rem
Sigmundr oc all
alla atgervi. Sig
menn fram oc
(Sigmundr and a
and all accomp
ancient traditio
Similar expres
I would argue
parallel murd
tions and far-
his life and ad
birds and shap
viour of gods
Ódinn and Lo
with treacher
20 On Loki and
Snorri's Gylfag
21 In GuÒrúnar
Brynhildr); GuÒ
22 In view of t
above, one migh
warrior and her
38 and GuÒrúna
no room for a de
23 Edgar Haimer
century poetic u
Here I treat the
name is associat
Moreover, all th
of Loki.
Sigrdrífumâl a
as the reason wh
Although a valk
order to prote
ļ>ess' (prose bef
curses her to sl
married. Altho
Sigrdrífumâl a
action is at lea
liaisons, provid
The poem also
deeply ironic in
Moreover, Sigr
brother or fath
for Sigurôr, bec
Sigrdrífumâl th
kinsmen by m
erence, in Sigrd
advice.26
Sigrdrifa has been revealing wisdom to Siguròr, beginning stanzas 6 to 7 and 9
to 13 with a different type of rune, followed by what the runes are useful for.
25 This phrase is from later paper manuscripts, for the Codex Regius lacuna begins at st. 29, line
1. However, there seems no reason to doubt its authenticity.
26 These are interrupted at number six by the lacuna. Thus, the exact progression from Sigrdrí-
fumâl to the following poem is unclear, and one can never be certain how or whether the betrothal
to Sigrdrifa is reconciled with the subsequent betrothal to Brynhildr. However, it is possible that
intervening prose might explain it with some device similar to the reincarnation motif of the Helgi
poems.
some of the h
mythological po
the eponymous
Skírnismdl can
has no sword a
how Snorri inte
52 if one under
embedded episo
the giant Hymi
serpent kill eac
them with hav
Ragnarçk. As U
from seeing it
the tradition o
PrymskviÒa exp
links to Ragnar
according to th
protagonists die
Klingenberg 1
One can take t
that, as a contes
narok' (1996, 39
HymiskviÒa , a
predicated on c
gods, in this ca
leads to the de
between Óâinn
explores divine
power struggle
strife or conf
heritage. And f
The heroic poem
ticularly kin-sl
28 As Dronke (19
above in HamÖism
(taming-wand, st.
st. 32); an eagle re
Conclusion
I have argued h
dismal, functi
mythological t
Ragnarçk in fo
Baldr, and the
revenge, is thus
to be consistent
pendence, and w
1 2 may even h
and control ret
on the implica
porary context.
The first is th
the compilatio
poems it contai
most vexed pro
provide suppor
as extant) belon
remain contro
The second is t
compilation, ale
allusion to Ragn
as an indictmen
ciple to the wid
family, so the k
sion in a commu
without its bra
so is GuÒrún w
without the com
friendship. Ki
revenge is self
saga , which w
Regius in the th
also have been e
might well hav
future vengea
Bibliography
Primary Sour
Dronke, Ursula, c
Press
Dronke, Ursula,
University Press
Faulkes, Anthony
Society for Nort
Faulkes, Anthony
for Northern Res
Faulkes, Anthon
Northern Researc
Finnur Jónsson,
(brudstykke af d
Klaeber, Friedrich
Larrington, Carol
Lindblad, Gustaf.
Neckel, Gustav,
verwandten Denk
Wimmer, L. F. A.,
Kgl. bibliothek i
Secondary So
Bonnetain, Y. S. 20
in International
Michael Dallapia
Brady, Caroline
Brodeur, Arthur
Studies 16, 133-
Clark, David. 200
in the Poetic Edd
Dronke, Ursula.
Haimerl, Edgar. 1
Jung Sigurddicht
Hallberg, Peter. 1
Linguistic and P
Amsterdam Stu
Linguistic Theor
Haraldur Bessason.
20.jūli 1977, 1, e
íslandi Rit 12, R
Millett, Bella. 1994. 'Mouvance and the Medieval Author: Re-editing Ancrene Wisse' , in Late
Medieval Texts and their Transmission: Essays in Honour of A. /. Doyle , ed. A. J. Minnis,
Woodbridge: Brewer, 9-20
Mitchell, Stephen A. 1991. 'Heroic Legend, Parricide, and Istaby', in The Audience of the Sagas:
The Eighth International Saga Conference, August 11-17, 1991 , I- II, Göteborg: Göteborg
University, 113-19
O'Donoghue, Heather. 2003. 'What Has Baldr to Do with Lamech? The Lethal Shot of a Blind
Man in Old Norse Myth and Jewish Exegetical Traditions', Medium Aivum 72 , 82-107
von See, Klaus. 1981. 'GuÒrúnarhvçt und HamÔismál', repr. in Edda, Saga, Skaldendichtung:
Aufsätze zur skandinavischen Literatur des Mittelalters, Heidelberg: Winter, 250-58
Thompson, Claiborne W. 1976. Review of Klingenberg 197 4, Journal of English and Germanic
Philology 75, 246-48