Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LEARNING OUTCOMES
At the end of this lesson, the students should be able to:
a. Discuss the concept of science education; and
b. Identify science schools established to promote science education in the
Philippines
INTRODUCTION
The Philippines is trying its best to improve the state of science education in the
country. This lesson will discuss the concept of science education and will identify some
strategies to promote science education in the country. One of the strategies is to establish
science schools that will encourage students to pursue their career in science and
technology and to nurture their gifted potentials in science.
Getting deeper into the discourse of science education, John Dewey (2001) stressed
the importance of utilizing the natural environment to teach students. Accordingly, nature
must indeed furnish its physical stimuli to provide wealth of meaning through social
activities and thinking. It is not surprising therefore that science education is important. In
fact, Marx (1994) opines that science is going to be one of the most important school
subjects in the future.
Since its inception, the PSHSS continues to pursue its vision to develop Filipino
science scholars with scientific minds and passion for excellence. PSHSS students have
proven to be a beacon of excellence, courage, and hope for the country. They have brought
honor to the Philippines through their exemplary achievements in various international
competitions and research circles. When the students graduate from the school, they are
expected to pursue degrees in science and technology at various colleges and universities
locally or abroad.
The subject Science and Health is taught in Grade 1 with a longer time compared to
other subjects: 70 minutes for Grades I to III and 80 minutes for Grades IV to VI. The
curriculum also utilizes different instructional approaches that address the learning styles
and needs of the learners like the use of investigatory projects.
Quezon City Regional Science High School
The school was established on September 17, 1967. Originally, it was named
Quezon City Science High School. It was turned into a regional science high school for the
National Capital Region in 1999. The school was a product of a dream to establish a special
science school for talented students in science and mathematics. The focus of the
curriculum is on science and technology. The school still teaches the basic education
courses prescribed by the Department of Education (DepEd) for secondary education.
However, there are additional subjects in sciences and technology that students should
take. The school envisions to serve as a venue in providing maximum opportunities for
science-gifted students to develop spirit of inquiry and creativity. The school is well-
supported by the local government unit and by the Parents and Teachers Association
(PTA). This school is under the Department of Education.
The school was established on October 1, 1963 as the Manila Science High School
(MSHS). It is the first science high school in the Philippines. The organization and
curriculum of the school puts more emphasis on science and mathematics. MSHS aims to
produce scientists with souls. In order to do this, humanities courses and other electives are
included in their curriculum. Students are also encouraged to participate in various
extracurricular activities. The school administers an entrance exam, the Manila Science
High School Admission Test (MSAT), for students who wish to enroll. The MSAT has five
parts: aptitude in science, aptitude test in mathematics, problem-solving test in science,
problem-solving test in mathematics, and proficiency in English. The school prides itself
from producing outstanding alumni and for winning various national competitions.
It is the home and pioneer of the prominent school-based innovation known as the
Dynamic Learning Program (DLP). The DLP is a synthesis of classical and modem
pedagogical theories adapted to foster the highest level of learning, creativity, and
productivity.
The school takes pride in its Research Center for Theoretical Physics (RCTP)
established in 1992, which organizes small international workshops to foster the informal
but intense exchange of ideas and perspectives on outstanding problems in physics and
mathematics.
LESSON 4: INDIGENOUS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IN THE
PHILIPPINES
Indigenous Knowledge
Indigenous Science
• Indigenous science is part of the indigenous knowledge system practiced by
different groups of people and early civilizations (Gribbin, 2001; Mkapa, 2004; Sibisi,
2004)
• Includes complex arrays of:
o knowledge
o expertise
o practices
• Pawilen (2005), representations that guide human societies in their enumerable
interactions with the natural milieu: agriculture, medicine, naming and explaining natural
phenomena, and strategies for coping with changing environments.
• Ogawa (1995) claimed that it is collectively lived in and experienced by the people
of a given culture.
• Cajete (2004), indigenous science includes everything, from metaphysics to
philosophy and various practical technologies practiced by indigenous people
both past and present.
• Iaccarino (2003) elaborated Cajete’s idea by explaining that science is a part of
culture, and how science is done largely depends on the cultural practices of
the people.
• Indigenous beliefs also develop desirable values that are relevant or consistent to
scientific attitudes as identified by Johnston (2000), namely:
o Motivating attitudes
o Cooperating attitudes
o Practical attitudes
o Reflective attitudes
• Pawilen (2005) explained that indigenous science knowledge has developed
diverse structures and contents through the interplay between the
society and the environment.
UNIT 2
LEARNING OUTCOMES
At the end of this lesson, the students will be able to:
a. Identify different conceptions of human flourishing;
b. Determine the development of the scientific method and validity of science;
c. Critic human flourishing vis-à-vis progress of science and technology to be
able to define for themselves the meaning of a good life.
CONTENT
Eudaimonia, literally “good spirited”, is a term coined by renowned Greek
philosopher Aristotle (385-323 BC) to describe the pinnacle of happiness that is
attainable by humans. This has often been translated into “human flourishing” in
literature, arguably likening humans to flowers achieving their full bloom. As discussed
in the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle’s human flourishing arises as a result of
different components such as phronesis, friendship, wealth, and power. In the
Ancient Greek society, they believe that acquiring these qualities will surely bring the
seekers happiness, which in effect allows them to partake in the notion of what we call
the Good.
Nicomachean Ethics – a philosophical inquiry into the nature of the good life
for a human being
according to this, “to discover the nature of human
happiness it is necessary to determine what the function of
human being is
Phronesis – the habit of making the right decision and taking the right actions
As time changes, elements that comprise human flourishing changed, which are
subject to the dynamic social history as written by humans. People found means to
live more comfortably, explore more places, develop more products, and make more
money, and then repeating the process in full circle. In the beginning, early people
relied on simple machines to make hunting and gathering easier. This development
allowed them to make grander and more sophisticated machines to aid them in their
endeavors that eventually lead to space explorations, medicine innovations, and
ventures of life after death. Our concept of human flourishing today proves to be
different from what Aristotle originally perceived then – humans of today are
expected to become a “man of the world”. He is supposed to situate himself in a
global neighborhood, working side by side among institutions and the government to
be able to reach a common goal. Competition as a means of survival has become
passe; coordination is the new trend.
1. Observation
2. State/determine the problem
3. Make a hypothesis
4. Test the hypothesis by doing an experiment
5. Analyze and interpret the results
6. Generalize/make a conclusion
7. Communicate the results
VERIFICATION THEORY
the idea proposes that a discipline is science if it can be confirmed of
interpreted in the event of an alternative hypothesis being accepted
it gives premium to empiricism (theory that states that knowledge comes
only or primarily from sensory experience)
takes into account those results which are measurable, and experiments
which are repeatable
supported by Vienna Circle
Vienna Circle – a group of scholars who believed that only those which
can be observed should be regarded as meaningful, and reject those
which cannot be directly accessed as meaningless
FALSIFICATION THEORY
asserts that as long as an ideology is not proven to be false and can best
explain a phenomenon over alternative theories, we should accept the
said ideology
due to its hospitable character, the shift to this theory allowed emergence
of theories otherwise rejected by verification theory.
It does not promote ultimate adoption of one theory but instead
encourages research in order to determine which among the theories can
stand the “test of falsification”. The strongest one is that which is able to
remain upheld amidst various tests, while being able to make particularly
risky predictions about the world.
Karl Popper is the known proponent of this view