Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cameron1 08
Cameron1 08
Kai-Uwe Heesch
Knut Kirchmann
Navid Nazemian
Siegrun Pache
Nils Peters
Tim Steffens
Stefanie Wasner
Table of contents:
Theoretical Background
!Team work
!Regular Meetings
!Minutes
!Discussions
!Brainstorming
!Calculations
!Co mparison of different scenarios
3)
1)
- credit
Acquisition - liquidity
- selffinancing
- capitallay-out
Group 1 Cameron Auto Parts (PartA) © allcopyrights: waterproof concepts
Prof. Dr. Rainer Schnauffer Internationale Kooperation und Lizenzvergabe University of Applied
Sciences
Theoretical Background
1)
Licensing :
Local company
=licensee
1)
Host country
Group 1 Cameron Auto Parts (PartA) © allcopyrights: waterproof concepts
Prof. Dr. Rainer Schnauffer Internationale Kooperation und Lizenzvergabe University of Applied
Sciences
Theoretical Background
1)
Export :
indirect
direct
Independent
International
Marketing
Intermediator Agent
Distributor
1)
Sales Branch
Host country
Group 1 Cameron Auto Parts (PartA) © allcopyrights: waterproof concepts
Prof. Dr. Rainer Schnauffer Internationale Kooperation und Lizenzvergabe University of Applied
Sciences
Advantages Disadvantages
of Licensing of Licensing
Advantages Disadvantages
of Export of Export
Advantages of Licensing
Economies of scope
Disadvantages of Licensing
Know-how diffusion
Advantages of Export
Independence
Economies of scalein the long run
Higher quality through own responsibility
Disadvantages of Export
High Investments
Lack of capacity
No specific market knowledge
Currency risks
Transportrisks
Trade barriers
Preparatory calculations
Premises:
Price charged by Cameron as exporter: $ 100/unit
Price charged by McTaggart as distributor: $ 176/unit
Price charged by McTaggart as licensee: $ 176/unit(exhibit 3, page 12)
Preparatory calculations
Licensing:
Royalties:
" 3% up to $ 1.5 Mio
" 2% over $ 1.5 Mio
" $ 100,000 knowledge transfer fees
Export:
" Profitability on revenue: 16.67 %
based on forecast 1994: $ 5 Mio profit x 100 = 16.67%
$ 30 Mio revenue
Ca meron‘s profit:f(x)-> 0.03x + 0.02y + 0.1667z
x= McTaggart‘s revenue up to $ 1.5 Mio (Licensing)
y=McTaggart‘s revenue over $ 1.5 Mio (Licensing)
z= Cameron‘s revenue export
Alternatives
Licensing $ 15,000 $ 45,000 $ 135,000
Export $ 47,380 $ 142,045 $ 568,181
x=500,000 x=1.5 Mio x=1.5
=6 Mio
Mio
y=0 y=0 y=1.5 Mio
z=284,090 z=852,270
z=3,409,090
x= McTaggart‘s revenue up to $ 1.5 Mio (Licensing)
y=McTaggart‘s revenue over $ 1.5 Mio (Licensing)
z= Cameron‘s revenue export
Thousand USD
8
600 56
500
400
300
2
200 14 135
100 15 4
7 45
0 Scenario
bad
good
medium
Licensing
Export
Conclusion
BUT
Licensing easierto implement because of restricted capacities
New plant: $ 10 Mio
or
Two-shift work
or
Reduction ofcore business
YES!
Group 1 Cameron Auto Parts (PartA) © allcopyrights: waterproof concepts
Prof. Dr. Rainer Schnauffer Internationale Kooperation und Lizenzvergabe University of Applied
Sciences
100
80 41%
60
liabilities
40 equity
59%
20
0
100%
£ Mio 45 44
40 35
35
30
25
20 Revenues
15
10
5
0 Year
1991 1993
Revenue
Profit
35
1,5
0 10 20 30 40
£ Mio
[Page 12, case study part A]
W hat we get:
3 % royalties up 2 % royalties
to 1.5 Mio over 1.5 Mio
revenues
$100,000
knowledge
transfer fee
Free technology License for 5
transfer clause years, renewable
for further 5 years
Image, Name,
Our technology know- Brand
how for producing
flexible couplings
W hat we offer:
Conclusion:
Our suggestion:
5% would be appropriate
This rate wouldn‘t decrease McTaggart‘s motivation
Sources:
1)
Handout International Marketing, Prof. J.Höppner, p. 91
2)
Kutschker 1992
3)
Meffert,Bolz,Internationales Marketing Management
Questions?