FI Focused Improvement

Monterrey Brewery

Revision: 01 Document Type: Knowledge Item

Page 1
Date: May 2014 Filename: Pillar audit Presentation
 Step 5 - Deploy and attack energy losses

Understand the current situation Determine and minimise gap with action plan to
Restore basic conditions on Analyse and solve anomalies
benchmark level / technological limit
Energy & Water transportation (sporadic) or assign a team
Deploy energy losses and set
(leakages, insulation, ...) (repetitive)
priorities Achieve world class energy level
implementing good practices
0 0 0
0
*No data collection system *No actions to restore basic *No monitoring system, No solving
* No calculation of technological limit
* No deployments conditions anomalies
1
1 1
*Data collection on monthy basis 1
*Basic conditions are improving *Monitoring System exists
* Not all meters are calibrated * There is a calculation of technological limit but only
based on periodic survey *Monthy meetings to analyze
*Some deployments but no clear for few areas (less than 20%)
*using tags is sporadic anomalies and take actions
priorities
2 2
Data collection on monthy basis *Monitoring System exists
2 2
*All meters are calibrated *Weekly meetings to analyze
*Using tags is a routine * Technological limit is calculated for more than 50%
*Deployments (based on anomalies and take actions
*Sporadic usage of Good Practicies of equipment
measurement or QA matrix) are * Improvement teams are often use
used for setting priorities for improvements
3
3
Data collection on weekly basis 3
*Monitoring System exists
*All meters are calibrated *Using tags is a routine 3
*Weekly meetings to analyze
*Deployments (based on *All existing Good Practicies are * Technological limit is almost covering the plant
anomalies and take actions
measurement or QA matrix) are reviewed on quarterly basis * Some examples of improvement of technological
* Anomalies are sporadic
used for setting priorities *All possible Good Practicies are limit
*Using improvement teams is a
*Benchmarking tool (e.g. UBM) is in applied
routine
place
4 4
4 Monitoring System exists
Data collection on weekly basis *Using tags is a routine
*Weekly meetings to analyze 4
*All meters are calibrated *All existing Good Practicies are
anomalies and take actions * Technological limit is fully covering the plant
*Benchmarking tool (e.g. UBM) is in reviewed on quarterly basis
*The system to react for anomalies * There is continuous improvement of technological
place *All possible Good Practicies are
on daily basis is in place limit
*Priorities are set based on applied
*Using improvement teams is a
differencies between actual usage *There is no example of lack of basic
routine
Page 2 and benchmark condition
2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1
 Data Collection On Weekly Basis
CONSUMO ENVASADO
DIA
L-010 L-050 L-060 L-070 L-080 L-090 L-100 L-110 Pasts.
01/09/2014 7,262 5,000 5,170 1,536 630 2,168 973 10,782 7,531 41,051.31
02/09/2014 6,824 4,597 4,740 2,986 1,230 5,425 906 10,210 6,426 43,344.58
03/09/2014 6,710 5,177 4,710 2,997 1,260 2,088 953 10,892 6,262 41,048.29

Daily tracking for Energy Consumption for Line 04/09/2014

05/09/2014
6,944
7,003
5,149
5,186
4,880
4,810
1,530
5,730
620
1,100
1,277
1,033
987
966
10,098
7,674
6,621
6,129
38,105.96
39,630.12
06/09/2014 7,156 5,046 3,760 7,671 1,180 1,103 968 11,075 6,402 44,360.94
with a Color Trigger for consumption above 07/09/2014
08/09/2014
3,467
5,046
5,232
3,780
4,920
4,990
7,788
6,535
1,230
1,170
1,131
1,145
970
947
10,983
9,928
6,273
6,379
41,994.27
39,920.26
09/09/2014 7,059 5,366 4,850 2,960 1,240 1,346 748 10,714 7,013 41,295.73
average. 10/09/2014
11/09/2014
7,168
7,080
5,392
5,105
4,860
4,850
2,912
1,220
1,200
430
898
3,713
960
914
10,436
11,132
6,457
6,739
40,283.14
41,182.78
12/09/2014 7,103 5,115 5,190 3,687 270 5,406 970 9,382 6,880 44,003.34
13/09/2014 6,466 5,193 4,100 5,065 1,200 5,494 960 11,088 6,185 45,750.86
14/09/2014 7,224 5,398 5,000 2,715 1,220 5,428 970 11,034 5,962 44,951.06

• Water 15/09/2014
16/09/2014
7,023
7,180
4,381
5,144
4,990
5,140
2,656
2,960
1,220
1,280
4,473
1,277
1,023
973
10,600
10,933
6,559
1,753
42,924.32
36,639.89
17/09/2014 7,487 4,990 5,160 1,556 640 1,190 958 11,505 6,760 40,245.85
• Thermal 18/09/2014
19/09/2014
7,275
7,097
5,383
5,096
5,000
4,860
1,062
2,600
410
1,280
1,354
3,910
867
977
8,756
10,612
7,950
7,237
38,057.37
43,668.85
20/09/2014 7,292 5,340 3,530 2,480 1,150 5,347 987 11,284 7,658 45,067.40
• Electrical 21/09/2014
22/09/2014
3,517
6,754
4,968
3,697
4,910
5,110
2,495
2,847
1,220
1,180
5,107
4,337
945
1,007
9,354
10,052
7,702
7,081
40,217.86
42,064.69
23/09/2014 6,742 4,853 4,800 2,733 1,110 1,324 951 10,458 7,490 40,460.35
24/09/2014 7,134 5,370 4,800 2,321 990 1,134 958 10,729 7,235 40,670.59
25/09/2014 7,044 5,420 4,910 3,258 300 4,143 1,001 3,793 6,429 36,298.19
26/09/2014 6,931 5,005 4,790 4,582 1,210 5,348 1,001 1,734 7,694 38,295.53
27/09/2014 5,849 7,113 4,470 5,808 1,200 5,493 877 0 7,717 38,526.70
28/09/2014 7,290 3,345 4,960 7,529 1,200 5,559 1,000 5,572 6,827 43,281.46
29/09/2014 7,145 4,230 4,950 7,430 1,220 5,223 971 9,288 6,981 47,438.54
30/09/2014 7,157 5,298 4,830 3,891 1,320 5,417 995 9,836 7,387 46,130.73

Total 201,429 150,369 144,040 111,540 30,910 98,288 28,683 279,934 201,718 1,246,911
Average 6714 5012 4801 3718 1030 3276 956 9331 6724 41564
Acum Anual 1,759,127 1,316,525 1,196,470 1,044,080 238,640 857,966 247,369 2,603,545 1,605,807 11,206,646

Page 3
 Data Collection On Weekly Basis
All meters with W001
Edificio M22 M22 W005 W006 W007 W08 W009 W010 M25 M24 W013 M22 W015

tags to easy Superior

XXLager
Agua
suave Uni
Elaborac *O ppm Envasad Torre de *Vestidore
iòn Gral. M3 o SICSA Enfriami s de Fza. *Hacia
*Agua
Tratada
*Salòn
de la
identification + Bohemia SM-4 tanques Servicio Elaboraci FM ento SM- Motriz SCI Envasad Planta Fama Masilla

DIA
Segurida M3 M3 M3 òn M3 3 M3 M3 M3 o Barril Piloto M3 M3 M3
description 31/08/2014 9999188 990162 316293 1609311 119451 4945563 4201 310052 5859 2080957 147021 35840 61635 76113
01/09/2014 9999188 990633 316440 1609667 119469 4946279 4201 310057 5859 2081522 147022 35854 61638 76138
02/09/2014 9999188 991103 316572 1610077 119490 4947003 4201 310067 5859 2082096 147022 35868 61638 76142
03/09/2014 9999188 991511 316658 1610367 119512 4947692 4201 310072 5859 2082674 147022 35885 61638 76158
04/09/2014 9999188 991875 316765 1610658 119530 4948502 4201 310077 5859 2083212 147022 35890 61638 76162
05/09/2014 9999188 992203 316838 1610978 119548 4949308 4201 310082 5859 2083802 147022 35900 61638 76167
06/09/2014 9999188 992616 316963 1611264 119566 4949994 4201 310085 5859 2084319 147022 35902 61638 76171
07/09/2014 9999188 993124 317050 1611680 119588 4950604 4201 310086 5859 2084776 147022 35903 61638 76177

Daily collection meter

consumption. PC Sala Maquinas # 1 Lecturas en PC de Oficina Fuerza Motriz
Vapor Vapor
• Water ERPV-1
ERPV- ERPV-
2 3 4.5
Vapor
36 Condensado
36 Kg. SC y F 24

Mes

Día
• Thermal Tons. Tons. Tons.
ENV Coctos Coctos
Tons. Tons.
Iberdr
ola
Iberdrol
Iberdr Iberdrola
ola Tons.
a Tons.
• Electrical 31/08/2014 53307
1y3 2

500204 514682 88993 33203

Tons.
62890 376920
Tons.
2340456 8420
A 01/09/2014 53525 500350 514761 89421 33211 62899 376920 2340875 8627
G 02/09/2014 53772 500376 514916 89908 33218 62907 376920 2341342 8885
O 03/09/2014 54006 500401 515038 90330 33225 62914 376920 2341756 9089
S 04/09/2014 54265 500426 515168 90818 33233 62917 376921 2342224 9352
T 05/09/2014 54501 500452 515285 91236 33241 62919 376921 2342650 9571
O 06/09/2014 54710 500477 515408 91659 33248 62921 376921 2343087 9812
07/09/2014 54915 500503 515534 92078 33253 62925 376921 2343499 10051
2 08/09/2014 55137 500528 515669 92467 33260 62929 376921 2343868 10239
0 09/09/2014 55412 500553 515735 92905 33267 62934 376921 2344297 10435
E003 *E004 *E005 *E007 E008 *E009 E010 E011 E012 E013 E014 E015 E016 E017 E018
SIST. SIST.
1 10/09/2014 55688 500578 515844 93364 33273 62937 376921 2344735 10649
Acom Climas SIST. SIST. OFICINA OFICINA OSMOSIS 4 11/09/2014 55936 500603 515974 93830 33280 62940 376921 2345188 10891
FM2 FM3 FM5 FM7 PEGI PEGI Gob II
DIA

Malta FM6 *(Kw) ED FUND CFE NTE CFE SUR S NTE S SUR INVERSA
*(Mw) *(Mw) *(Kw) *(Kw) NTE SUR *Mw
(Kw) *(Kw) *(Mw) *(Mw) *(Mw) *(Mw) *(Mw)
*(Mw) *(Mw)

31/08/2014 2957071 2801 2420 1194715 1696 4729199 2042685 8960 265 2572 4636 5269 3032 7920 895
01/09/2014 2962142 2801 2424 1194972 1699 4736206 2043515 8960 265 2573 4638 5271 3033 7921 895
02/09/2014 2968660 2801 2428 1195213 1701 4743630 2044282 8960 265 2573 4640 5273 3035 7923 895
03/09/2014 2975012 2801 2432 1195479 1703 4749536 2044968 8960 265 2574 4642 5276 3036 7924 895
04/09/2014 2980059 2801 2436 1195776 1705 4755859 2045612 8960 265 2574 4643 5278 3037 7926 895
05/09/2014 2985525 2801 2439 1196100 1707 4762232 2046265 8960 265 2575 4645 5280 3038 7927 896
06/09/2014 2990948 2801 2443 1196433 1709 4769975 2046265 8960 265 2576 4646 5281 3039 7929 896
07/09/2014 2995822 2801 2446 1196768 1711 4778151 2046265 8960 265 2576 4648 5282 3039 7931 896
08/09/2014 774 2802 2450 1197047 1713 4784965 2047014 8960 265 2577 4650 5284 3040 7933 896
09/09/2014 6983 2802 2454 1197386 1715 4791309 2047733 8960 265 2578 4651 5286 3041 7934 896
10/09/2014 11861 2802 2458 1197718 1718 4797527 2048464 8960 265 2578 4653 5289 3042 7936 897
11/09/2014 18233 2802 2462 1198001 1720 4804138 2049194 8960 265 2579 4655 5291 3044 7938 897
12/09/2014 23820 2802 2466 1198318 1722 4812123 2049870 8960 265 2579 4657 5293 3045 7939 897

Page 4
 Data Collection On Weekly Basis @ DCS

All Energy Consumption are checked

daily @ DCS Board to ensure right
consumption.

Page 5
 Data Collection On Weekly Basis @ DCS

Energy
Consumption out
of target launch a
corrective action

Page 6
 All meters are listed & with a calibration plan.

Page 7
 All meters are listed & with a calibration plan.

Calibration aligned with PM

Plan - SAP

Page 8
 Deployments vs BaBF

Visión 2020 BaBF

86 MJ/hl for combined energy
and 3,7 hl/hl for water

Page 9
 Deployment Q2 vs UBM

Priorities are set up based on

Deployments Standard
deviations and Potatoes
Diagram.

Page 10
 Deployments Q3 vs UBM

Page 11
 Benchmark Tool – UBM @ Utilities Board

Yearly Review to update

information – For New House
consumption will be done by end
of the year.

Page 12
 Priorities based on actual usage vs UBM Benchmark Data
Agua Electricidad Vapor
2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017
3.35 3.30 3.25 6.79 6.55 6.50 59.00 58.00 56.00

BENCHMARK OF UTILITY CONSUMPTIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENTS AND UTILITIES

ELECTRICAL ENERGY: Current values Benchmark values Current values Benchmark values
Brewhouse 1.06 0.28 kWh/hl produced 1.74 0.47 kWh/hl cold wort
Cellars/Service Blk. 0.41 kWh/hl produced 1.05 0.41 kWh/hl bright beer
Packaging 1.68 1.57 kWh/hl produced 1.68 1.61 kWh/hl packed
Utility department 3.68 3.87 kWh/hl produced
Others 0.54 0.32 kWh/hl produced
Unidentified consumption -0.01 kWh/hl produced
TOTAL 6.95 6.44 kWh/hl produced

THERMAL ENERGY: Current values Benchmark values Current values Benchmark values
Brewhouse 29.13 21.54 MJ/hl produced 53.32 35.95 MJ/hl cold wort
Cellars/Service Blk. 3.31 9.47 MJ/hl produced 32.18 9.60 MJ/hl bright beer
Packaging 30.13 20.62 MJ/hl produced 30.20 21.12 MJ/hl packed
Utility department 0.02 0.97 MJ/hl produced
Heating 2.56 MJ/hl produced
Heat brew house utilisation 0.00 MJ/hl produced (already included in Brewhouse)
Unidentified consumption 2.36 MJ/hl produced
TOTAL 64.95 55.17 MJ/hl produced

WATER: Current values Benchmark values Current values Benchmark values

Brewhouse 2.05 0.84 hl/hl produced 3.37 1.41 hl/hl cold wort
Cellars/Service Blk. 1.14 hl/hl produced 2.03 1.15 hl/hl bright beer
Packaging 0.89 0.94 hl/hl produced 0.88 0.96 hl/hl packed
Utility department 0.47 0.54 hl/hl produced
Others 0.08 hl/hl produced
Unidentified consumption hl/hl produced
TOTAL 3.41 3.55 hl/hl produced

DETAILS UTILITIES:
Electrical energy: Current values Benchmark values
Cooling 2.22 2.20 kWh/hl produced
Compressed air 0.57 0.47 kWh/hl produced
CO2 plant 0.50 0.24 kWh/hl produced
Steam plant
Water treatment plant
0.00
0.37
0.00
0.50
kWh/hl
kWh/hl
produced
produced Benchmark Values @
Waste water treatment plant 0.54 0.15 kWh/hl produced
Engine room others
TOTAL 4.20
0.30
3.87
kWh/hl
kWh/hl
produced
produced
UBM
Water: Current values Benchmark values
Condensers 0.00 0.15 hl/hl produced
Once through cooling water 0.00 0.00 hl/hl produced
Boiler water make up 0.00 0.02 hl/hl produced
CO2 plant 0.02 hl/hl produced
Watertreatment + others 0.00 0.34 hl/hl produced
TOTAL 0.00 0.54 hl/hl produced

TARGETS OTHER UTILITIES: Current values Benchmark values

CO2 production 0.00 2.20 kg/hl produced
CO2 consumption 0.00 2.96 kg/hl produced
Compressed air consumption 0.00 3.54 Nm³/hl produced
Refrigeration 0.00 20.79 MJ/hl produced
Waste water 0.00 0.88 kg COD/hl produced

Page 13
 Using tags is a routine

Tracking of Tagging
@ Department DCS

Page 14
 Using tags is a routine

Tagging is part of
daily inspection
CILT

Page 15
 Good Practices examples review looking to reapply

Water RO
Antifouling use as
Benchmark from
Tecate Plant.

Page 16
 Good Practices are reviewed.

Guadalajara Plant
DS review looking
for good practices
to copy.

Page 17
 Peer 4 Quartely Review looking for Benchmark
Agua Electricidad Vapor
1 Planta País 2Q KPI 1 Planta País 2Q KPI 1 Planta País 2Q KPI
2 Lus o Portuga l 1.25 2 Lus o Portuga l 3.22 2 Lus o Portuga l 8
3 Bunni k Netherl a nds 2.7 3 Bunni k Netherl a nds 5 3 Bunni k Netherl a nds 29
4 Zywi ec Pol and 2.74 4 Hereford Uni ted Ki ngdom 5.19 4 La hti Fi nl and 37
5 El bl a g Pol and 2.84 5 El bl a g Pol and 5.7 5 Hereford Uni ted Ki ngdom 42
6 Ho Chi Mi nh Ci ty Vi etna m 2.89 6 Zywi ec Pol and 5.98 6 Ho Chi Mi nh Ci ty Vi etna m 50
7 Hereford Uni ted Ki ngdom 3 7 Sopron Hungary 6.37 7 Zoeterwoude Netherl a nds 52
8 Da na ng Ci ty Vi etna m 3.06 8 Wa rka Pol and 6.39 8 El bl ag Pol and 53
9 Guada l a ja ra Mexi co 3.07 9 Cra i ova Romani a 6.43 9 Sevi l l a Spai n 54
10 Wa rka Pol and 3.12 10 Hurba novo Sl ova ki a 6.6 10 Zywi ec Pol and 56
11 La hti Fi nl and 3.13 11 Ho Chi Mi nh Ci ty Vi etna m 6.66 11 Ni zhny Novgorod Rus s i a n Fed. 57
12 Ma nches ter Uni ted Ki ngdom 3.16 12 Ori za ba Mexi co 6.79 12 Cra i ova Romani a 58
13 Tecate Mexi co 3.17 13 Tol uca Mexi co 6.8 13 Da na ng Ci ty Vi etna m 58
14 Ni zhny Novgorod Rus s i a n Fed. 3.17 14 Bujumbura Burundi 6.81 14 Ma s s a fra Ita l y 58
15 Vi a l onga Portuga l 3.2 15 Monterrey Mexi co 6.84 15 Wa rka Pol and 61
16 Ekateri nburg Rus s i a n Fed. 3.22 16 Teca te Mexi co 6.87 16 Hurbanovo Sl ova ki a 62
17 Zoeterwoude Netherl a nds 3.31 17 Val enci a Spai n 62
18 Sopron Hunga ry 3.31 18 Den Bos ch Netherl a nds 62
19 Na vojoa Mexi co 3.39 19 Sopron Hungary 64
20 Monterrey Mexi co 3.4 20 Monterrey Mexi co 64

Other Examples.
Aqua Sel – Zoeterwoude.
Moisture Separator – Orizaba
Air Compressed Outsourcing – Orizaba
Etc.

Page 18
 The system to react for anomalies on daily basis is in place

We review Twice per week BDA and other anomalies tools to solve them.

Page 19
 The system to react for anomalies on daily basis is in place

For anomalies of
process, we send
an analysis and
launch a BDA

Page 20
 Using Improvement Teams as a Routine

Page 21
 Using Improvement Teams as a Routine

Page 22
 Using Improvement Teams as a Routine

Daily tracking of
Energy
Consumption
through all DCS
Meetings

Page 23
 Using Improvement Teams as a Routine
Start of Year we only measure main KPI
6. ENERGÉTICOS
KPI Diario Meta % Var. Trend
E. ELÉCTRICA 5.91 7.24 -18.4% CO2
Improvement of
AGUA 3.07 3.59 -14.5% Recepción Consumo
TÉRMICA 58.86 67.4 -12.7% 263 506 Energy Review
Meetings
Diario Meta Diario Meta Diario Meta Recepción Consumo
8.00 4.00 80.00 600
500
6.00 3.00 60.00 506
400
7.24 3.59 67.4
4.00 2.00 40.00 300
5.91 3.07 58.8
200 263
2.00 1.00 20.00 6
100
- - - -
E. ELÉCTRICA AGUA TÉRMICA CO2

Energy Consumption for Direction Meeting By Department

Page 24
 Monitoring System exists
Daily tracking of Energy
Consumption sensitive
to variation with visual
aids.

Page 25
 Monitoring System exists
Daily Projection of
Consumption
based on historical
and tendency.

Consumo Agua Produc c ión Indic es Diario Indic e MTD

Fec ha Proyec ∑ Proyecc Consumo Real ∑ Real Producción ∑ Proyecc Prod Real ∑ Prod Re Proyecc Real Proyec c Real
01/10/2014 75720 75,720 25,982 25,982 25,982 25,982 2.91 2.91
02/10/2014 90617 166,338 26,814 52,797 26,814 52,797 3.38 3.15
03/10/2014 86768 253,106 25,910 78,707 25,910 78,707 3.35 3.22
04/10/2014 84505 337,611 23,778 102,485 23,778 102,485 3.55 3.29
05/10/2014 88945 426,556 23,924 126,410 23,924 126,410 3.72 3.37
06/10/2014 99425 525,981 26,856 153,265 26,856 153,265 3.70 3.43
07/10/2014 84456 610,437 23,646 176,911 23,646 176,911 3.57 3.45
08/10/2014 74600 685,037 27,359 204,270 27,359 204,270 2.73 3.35
09/10/2014 101286 786,323 30,011 234,281 30,011 234,281 3.37 3.36
10/10/2014 95778 882,101 29,110 263,392 29,110 263,392 3.29 3.35
11/10/2014 98717 980,818 28,343 291,735 28,343 291,735 3.48 3.36
12/10/2014 95202 1,076,020 24,913 316,648 24,913 316,648 3.82 3.40
13/10/2014 95237 1,171,257 26,615 343,263 26,615 343,263 3.58 3.41
14/10/2014 98323 1,269,580 20,638 363,902 20,638 363,902 4.76 3.49
15/10/2014 82958 1,352,538 17,379 381,281 17,379 381,281 4.77 3.55
16/10/2014 52860 1,405,398 18,197 399,478 18,197 399,478 2.90 3.52
17/10/2014 74275 1,479,674 25,651 425,129 25,651 425,129 2.90 3.48
18/10/2014 83953 1,563,627 27,200 452,328 27,200 452,328 3.09 3.46
19/10/2014 93656 1,657,283 23,384 475,712 23,384 475,712 4.01 3.48
20/10/2014 89858 1,747,141 25,804 501,516 25,804 501,516 3.48 3.48
21/10/2014 90387 1,837,528 24,441 525,957 24,441 525,957 3.70 3.49
22/10/2014 75534 1,913,062 22,758 548,715 22,758 548,715 3.32 3.49
23/10/2014 66936 1,979,998 24,808 573,522 24,808 573,522 2.70 3.45
24/10/2014 78587 2,058,585 22,837 596,359 22,837 596,359 3.44 3.45
25/10/2014 92036 2,150,621 24,305 620,664 24,305 620,664 3.79 3.47
26/10/2014 102935 2,253,556 28,125 648,789 28,125 648,789 3.66 3.47
27/10/2014 90953 2,344,509 24,814 673,603 24,814 673,603 3.67 3.48
28/10/2014 84690 2,429,199 19,490 693,093 19,490 693,093 4.35 3.50
29/10/2014 62085 2,491,284 16,177 709,269 16,177 709,269 3.84 3.51
30/10/2014 92879 2,584,163 22,674 731,943 22,674 731,943 4.10 3.53
31/10/2014 91995 2,676,159 23,993 755,936 23,993 755,936 3.83 3.54

Page 26
 Technological limit

94% of Main consumers with

a measurement equipment.

Page 27
 Technological Limit
MEMORIA DE CALCULO FECHA PLANTA MEMORIA No
DESCRIPCION: CALCULO CONSUMO NOMINAL DE VAPOR PAST. 11 oct-14 CCM CM-01 CANTECC MEMORIA DE CALCULO FECHA PLANTA MEMORIA No
CM-01
CA LCULO: ING. M . GUZM A N CHECO: ING. S. SA LA ZA R AP ROB O: ING. LEVENT NUM A NOGLU REV. CONSULTING DESCRIPCION: CONSUMO NOMINAL DE VAPOR LAVADORA No. 1
S.A . DE C.V. CA LCULO: ING. M . GUZM A N REVISO: ING. S. SA LA ZA R
oct-14 CCM
A P ROB O: ING. LEVENT NUM A NOGLU REV.A

1 Generalidades.
1 Generalidades.
1.1. Se nos pide calcular el consumo de vapor de maquinas lavadoras y pasteurizadoras de
envases de cerveza para comparar lo que debe de ser con los consumos medidos.
1.1. Se nos pide calcular el consumo de vapor de maquinas lavadoras y pasteurizadoras de
1.2. Se5.
pidió información de los equipos como:
Calculo pasteurizadora.
envases de cerveza para comparar lo que debe de ser con los consumos medidos. Volumen de agua de los tanques de cada maquina.
Temperaturas del agua en cada tanque.
Volumen
5.1 del vidrio de losen
Consumo envases.
el arranque de la pasteurizadora de línea 1.
1.2. Se pidió información de los equipos como: Volumen de producto en los envases.
Cantidad de envases por hora por maquina.
Volumen de agua de los tanques de cada maquina. Esta pausterizadora tiene las siguientes capacidades de tanques:
1.3. Con estos datos se sacara primeramente el consumo de vapor para calentar el agua
Temperaturas del agua en cada tanque. en el arranque de la operación y ya en operación se calculara el calor para calentar
Volumen del vidrio de los envases. CALENTA
el agua de reposición, el vapor que se requiere M I CALENTA
para M IE
calentar el P REENFRIA
envase y la suma deP REENFRIA P REENFRI P REENFRI
estos dos será el consumo en operación ENTO
mas 1las perdidas
NTOdel
2 equipoMpor
IENTO 1
radiación. M IENTO 2 A M IENTO 3 A M IENTO 4
Volumen de producto en los envases. Temperatura de entrada de el agua = 25 °C = 77.0
2 Consideraciones. Litros 7475 4077 6795 4077 4077 4077
Cantidad de envases por hora por maquina. Libras 16445 8969 8969=
a 149496.0 Kg/cm2 8969
2.1. Se considera que el vapor de alimentación a las maquinas
Temperatura final llega
del agua 66 °C =8969 150.3 °F
( 85.2 PSI Temp.
) °C 65.8 64.2 56.5 44.5 36.8 32
1.3. Con estos datos se sacara primeramente el consumo de vapor para calentar el agua 2.2. Se considera que elTemp.
consumo°Fde agua 150.44
Flujodede agua de
reposición 147.56 lavadora133.7
repuesto
en cada es de= 112.1
166 98.24
Lts/Hr=
0.5 Mts3/Hr 89.6 366 Lb/Hr
en el arranque de la operación y ya en operación se calculara el calor para calentar ( 2.20459 ) GPM y que regresa de fuerza motriz a 25 °C ( 77 ) °F

el agua de reposición, el vapor que se requiere para calentar el envase y la suma de 5.1.1
2.3. Se Susuncargas
considera termicas
2% de perdidas de para
Calor
calor por el arranque
porradiación
agua repuesto serian:
=
en los tanques. 26806 BTU/Hr = 28 Mjuls/Hr
estos dos será el consumo en operación mas las perdidas del equipo por radiación. 3. Formulas.
Ejemplo: PASTEURIZADO 7475 x 1 x (103-77) = 428622 BTU/Hr
Consumo de vapor agua de repuesto = 30 Lb/Hr
3.1. Para el flujo de calor:
2 Consideraciones. CALENTA M I CALENTA M IE P REENFRIA P REENFRIA
Perdidas por radiación del equipoM IENTO 2 P REENFRI P REENFRI
Para el calculo del calor ENTOQ=
1 m*cp*Δt
NTO 2 M IENTO 1 A M IENTO 3 A M IENTO 4
2.1. Se considera que el vapor de alimentación a las maquinas llega a 6.0 Kg/cm2
( 85.2 PSI ) BTU/Hr
En donde 1207721
Sim=
el calor 632880.86
total 847608.3es 314825.9 303524
en los tanques 190510 113014
BTU/H
Mjuls/Hr masa
1280 671 Kg
898 334 202 120
cp calor especifico BTU/Lb/°F
Diferencia
Δt=calor
El perdidode temp,
seria el 5%°Co sea 15176 BTU/H
2.2. Se considera que el consumo de agua de reposición en cada lavadora es de 0.5 Mts3/Hr Consumo de vapor
( 2.20 ) GPM y que regresa de fuerza motriz a 25 °C ( 77 ) °F 3.2. Factores de conver
Calor de radiación = 15176 BTU/Hr = 16 Mjuls/Hr
1 Kg A= la 2.2
presión
Lb que se alimenta el vapor a los intercambiadores de calor, 6 Kg/Hr
1 BTU (85.2
= 1.0597 Kjuls las siguientes características:
PSI) tiene
2.3. Se considera un 2% de perdidas de calor por radiación en los tanques. 1 litro agua = 1 Kg Consumo de vapor por radiación = 17 Lb/Hr

Temperatura 324.9 °F 162.7222 °C

2.4. Como no tenemos datos de la pausterizadora 8, consideraremos que es similar a la Calor de liquido 295.5 Btu/Lb
pausterizadora 7. Consumo total en operación
Calor de evaporación 891 Btu/Lb
Calor total 1186.4 Btu/Lb
Consumo de vapor de las botellas = 582 Lb/Hr
3. Formulas.
Dividiendo los BTU/H del tanque entre el calor de evaporación en BTU/Lb
Consumo de vapor de liquido = 1177 Lb/Hr
nos dara las libras por hora de vapor requeridas:
3.1. Para el flujo de calor:
Consumo de vapor agua de repuesto = 30 Lb/Hr
CALENTA M I CALENTA M IE P REENFRIA P REENFRIA P REENFRI P REENFRI
Para el calculo del calor Q= m*cp*Δt ENTO 1 NTO 2
Consumo de vapor radiación =
M IENTO 1 M IENTO 2 A M IENTO 3 A M IENTO 4
17 Lb/Hr
Lb/Hr 1355 710 951 353 214 127
En donde Kg/Hr 616 323 432 161
TOTAL 97
1806 58
Lb/Hr
m= masa Kg 821 Kg/Hr
1705 Mjuls/Hr
cp calor especifico BTU/Lb/°F
Δt= Diferencia de temp, °C Consumo de vapor total en arranque=
Resumen.
341
En resumen Lb/Hr
los consumos son:
155 Kg/Hr Consumo diario en 24
322 EnMjuls/Hr
arranque 341 Lb/Hr 8176 Lb/Hr
155 Kg/Hr 3716 Kg/Hr
Calculation Memory made & 322 Mjuls/Hr 7719 Mjuls/Hr

validated with support of En operacón 1806

821
Lb/Hr
Kg/Hr
43338
19699
Lb/Hr
Kg/Hr

technology experts. 1705 Mjuls/Hr 40920 Mjuls/Hr

Page 28
 Technological Limit

Information to
determine TL
based on
Equipment
Specification by
Supplier

Page 29