Self Plagairism

Self-citation and self-plagiarism

Referencing your own previously published work is known as self-citation. It is
important to give citations when ideas, data, etc have been discussed in your
previous publications. Correct self-citation conveys the level of originality in a
publication accurately and enables readers to understand the development
of ideas over time.

Avoiding self-plagiarism
Academic publication takes many different forms. Researchers will often write
up their findings for more than one publication, for example in a thesis and a
journal article, or a blog post and book chapter. This is not necessarily a
problem, but researchers need to consider their choices carefully. Reusing text
word-for-word in multiple pieces of writing is known as self-plagiarism. This
may seem like a contradiction because a researcher cannot ‘steal’ their own
ideas. Citations, however, are not just about giving credit for ideas, they also
enable readers to trace the development of an idea over time and honestly
represent the originality in a piece of writing.

Norms about what is an acceptable way of acknowledging that you have

previously published research have changed significantly, even in the past
decade. It is important that researchers are aware of what is considered good
practice in their disciplines. A supervisor, mentor, or peers may be able to offer
advice.

There is no definitive rule about when it is acceptable for a researcher to re-

use text word-for-word. You should consider this carefully on a case-by-case
basis taking into consideration:

1. the norms of your discipline

2. the conventions of the genre you are writing in (e.g. journal article, blog,
thesis etc)
3. the expectations of editors, publishers, examiners, and readers
4. copyright regulations and authorship.

There are three key questions you should ask yourself:

 1. does the piece of writing represent its own level of originality
accurately?
2. is that level of originality appropriate to the type of publication?
3. who has the right – ethically (authorship) and legally (copyright) – to
reproduce?

Many journals have a specific policy about reusing text, such as from a PhD
thesis, in the ‘Instructions to Authors’ section (or similar) of their webpage. You
should contact editorial staff of any publication to clarify any questions before
submitting.

The La Trobe guide, Interpreting iThenticate Reports: a Guide for Researchers

[DOC 711KB], includes a discussion of the expectations of different genres of
writing, and suggestions on how iThenticate can help manage self-citation
and avoid self-plagiarism.

Discipline approaches to self-plagiarism

Some style guides have a statement and/or guidelines relating to self-citation
or self-plagiarism which may be helpful:

From the MLA Style Manual and Guide to Scholarly Publication. Modern
Language Association of America: New York, 2008. Third edition. pp. 166-
167.(Humanities):

'Whereas reprinting one’s published work, such as having a journal article

appear in a subsequent book of essays, is professionally acceptable […]
professionals generally disapprove if previously published work is reissued,
whether verbatim or slightly revised, under another title or in some other
manner that gives the impression it is a new work. Although not the same as
plagiarizing someone else’s writing, self-plagiarism is another type of
unethical activity. If your current work draws on your own previously published
work, you must give full bibliographic information about the earlier
publication.'

From the Publication Manual of the American Psychological

Association. American Psychological Association: Washington, D.C., 2010. Sixth
edition. p. 16.(Social Sciences):

'Just as researchers do not present the work of others as their own

(plagiarism), they do not present their own previously published work as new
scholarship (self-plagiarism). There are, however, limited circumstances […]
under which authors may wish to duplicate without attribution (citation) their
previously used words, feeling that extensive self-referencing is undesirable
or awkward. […] The general view is that the core of the new document must
constitute an original contribution to knowledge, and only the amount of
previously published material necessary to understand that contribution
should be included, primarily in the discussion of theory and methodology.'

Reusing published material in Masters and PhD

theses
Including previously published material (text, ideas, data, even a whole
publication) in a Master's or PhD thesis is very common. You should consider
the key questions about self-citation above when doing so, and ensure
compliance with La Trobe requirements. Every thesis should clearly state what
material has been previously published and where.

If you paraphrase or quote short sections of your own text, you

should reference it as you would the work of another scholar.

You may insert a whole publication or publications into your thesis if

appropriate to the argument and structure. You should discuss this with a
supervisor as early as possible. If a thesis chapter is substantially based on
research reported in a previous publication, full citation details should be
included in the preface or each relevant chapter. The full reference should
also appear in the bibliography of the thesis.

Publications may form the majority of your thesis. In this case framing
material should also be included to show how the different publications are
thematically linked.

You must have written permission from the copyright holder to include
previously published material. In many cases the publisher, not the author, is
the copyright holder and permission must be sought.

If a co-authored publication is included in a thesis you must:

• have made a leading and significant contribution to the publication

• provide details of your contribution to each publication in the thesis
• provide verification of your contribution from co-authors.