Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Spring 2023
Lecture Note 8.
Market efficiency
(Reference Book Chapter 8)
Da-Hea Kim
Intro (1)
Market efficiency
Market prices fully reflect all available information quickly.
Securities are correctly priced, reflecting all relevant information.
Suppose that you are a proponent of the EMH. Which of the two investment
strategies―the active investment strategy & the passive investment
strategy― should you follow?
• If the market is efficient, any attempt to beat the market would be futile.
Event study
When the stock market is efficient, stock prices should follow a random walk.
Random walk: Process equally likely to step up or down by the same amount.
If prices reflect all available information, it must be that stock prices change only in
response to new information.
When corporate events (e.g., earnings, M&A, stock splits, issues of new debt or equity, etc.)
occur, new information is revealed to the public.
In an efficient market, security prices fully reflect all available information quickly.
The size of reaction to
The reaction to news should
news should be proper
occur only at the moment
based on the contents
of news announcement.
of news.
Suppose that a company announced reduction in the revenue forecast. There is no other
news relevant to the company value.
Does the positive return on the stock imply that the reduction in the revenue forecast is
good news to the company?
CAR (%)
2.00
July 17 -0.4 -0.2 1.50
0.50
July 19 -0.8 -0.6
0.00
July 20 -0.9 -1.0 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
-0.50
July 23 0.6 0.4
Days relative to event day
July 24 0.1 0.0
CAR (%)
• If the market underreacts to good news • If the market overreacts to good news
0 0
Weak-form EMH
• Stock prices already reflect all information contained in the history of past trading.
• Past prices, trading volume, or short interest.
Semistrong-form EMH
• Stock prices already reflect all publicly available information.
• History of past trading + fundamental data on the firm’s product line, quality of management,
balance sheet composition, patents held, earning forecasts, and accounting practices.
Strong-form EMH
• Stock prices reflect all relevant information, public or private.
• All publicly available information + inside information
b) The correlation between the return during a given week and the return during the
following week is zero.
c) One could have made superior returns by buying stocks after a 10% rise in price.
d) One could have made higher-than-average capital gains by holding stocks with low
dividend yields.
b) You cannot make superior profits by buying (or selling) stocks after the announcement of
an abnormal rise in dividends.
CAR (%)
Days relative
-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 to event day
Well-known anomalies
• Momentum effect
• Reversal effect
• Small-firm effect
• Book-to-market effect
• Post-Earnings-Announcement-Drift
Good or bad recent performance of particular stocks continues over intermediate horizon.
Portfolios of the best performing stocks in the recent past (ex., 12 months) (i.e., ”winners”)
appear to outperform the worst performing stocks (i.e., ”losers”).
Strategy to make money: Buy ____________, Sell ____________, & Hold for intermediate horizon.
Good or bad recent performance of particular stocks is reversed over long horizon.
Strategy to make money: Buy ____________, Sell ____________, & Hold for long horizon.
└ Contrarian investment strategy
CAR (%)
Months relative to
4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 portfolio formation
Annual return(%)
16.8 15.9 15.4 15.4
14.6 13.7
15 13.0
Implication for market efficiency: 11.2
10
_______________ __________-form efficiency.
5
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Size decile: 1 = small, 10 = large
20 17.5
Strategy to make money: 16.4
15.6
Firms with positive earnings news tend to outperform firms with negative earnings news
even after firms’ earnings announcements.
Inefficiencies
• Lakonishok, Shleifer, and Vishny (1995)
• Anomalies are evidence of systematic errors in the forecasts of stock analysts.
• Analysts extrapolate past performance too far into the future and therefore overprice firms with
recent good performance and underprice firms with recent poor performance.
• Ultimately when market participants recognize their errors, price reverse.
Some anomalies have not shown much staying power after being reported in the academic
literature.
• After the small-firm effect was published in the early 1980s, it promptly disappeared for
much of the rest of the decade.
At a cocktail party, your friend tells you that he beat the market for the past
year. Suppose you believe him. Is this a violation of the efficient market
hypothesis?
The distribution of risk-adjusted returns for U.S. mutual funds is bell-shaped, with a
negative mean.
If markets are efficient, little role exists for professional money managers.
You should shop for low management fees, and you should not work with full-
service brokers.
Can you (or anyone else) consistently “beat the market” using a certain
information?
(a) Nearly half of all professionally managed mutual funds are able to outperform the
S&P 500 in a typical year.
(b) Money managers who outperform the market (on a risk-adjusted basis) in one year
are likely to outperform in the following year.
(c) Stock prices tend to be predictably more volatile in January than in other months.
(d) Stock prices of companies that announce increased earnings in January tend to
outperform the market in February.
(e) Stocks that perform well in one week perform poorly in the following week.