The article and lecture both deal with the theories that account for the moon’s formation.

While the author of

the reading provides three specific reasons for thinking that there are three main body parts which explain the
formation of the stellar, the lecturer opposes this claim. In his opinion these factors are false.

First, the writer claims that the moon’s breakaway from the current Pacific Ocean basin suggests that it was
originally a part of the Earth. Furthermore, it is stated by the articles that is is also separated from it when
the planet was rotating. However, the lecturer calls this argument into question by saying that the alleged
breach would have completely devastated the earth. Further, he points out that the Apollo Mission discov-
ered that lunar rocks were far hotter than Earth, disproving the first assumption.

Second, the author mentions that a theory that contains the co-accretion or condensation proves the further
claims. On top of that, the reading contends that the Earth's only satellite was originated at the same time that
the planet from the original nebula of interstellar materials product of the aggregation of small particles.
Nevertheless, the professor argues that this could not have been possible due to the fact that gravitational
forces would have fused all the particles together. Moreover, he explains that this theory cannot explain the
reason why the Moon has a little core compared with the big one of the Earth composed of 50% of iron.

Thirdly, the writer asserts that the Moon may have been created by the Earth colliding with a planet larger
than Mars. Hence, the reading adds that it this also know as the "giant impact theory." As opposed to the au-
thor, the professor holds that this procedure would have resulted in a collection of moons and a number of bi-
ological processes, including evaporation, that in reality never happened. Moreover, he highlights that this is
necessary to develop more compelling theories.

Some high schools require all students to wear school uniforms. Other high schools permit students to decide
what to wear to school. Which of these two school policies do you think is better? Use specific reasons and
examples to support your opinion.

Many people nowadays disagree and promptly believe that children should have the flexibility to choose
their school attire, yet it is frequently asserted that students should wear a specified set of clothes to school.
Personally, I prefer schools to require a uniform. I feel this way for two reasons that I will examine in this es-
say.
 
First of all, assigning students a specific costume is a way to reinforce good behavior. One of the numerous
ways that students can develop positive traits is by dressing in accordance with the requirements of the edu-
cational institution. For instance, a recent study conducted in Europe indicated that 80% of young college
students wearing uniforms are well behaved when compared to young people who dress however they like.
Consequently, kids will develop a serious discipline for smart clothing in the future, when they will be ex-
pected to dress smartly. As a result, casual attire can support maintaining high school students' behavior. For
example, at university, I took many business courses, so I was constantly surrounded by future business
models who dressed extraordinarily smart, and it motivated me to do the same. I realized that my new smart
attire made me feel more confident. Furthermore, I managed to make a splendid impression on all of my pro-
fessors with not only my capabilities but also my well-looked-after self, which led my credits to increase.
 
Second, a typical costume also reflects a certain brand. Evidently, if senior students wear uniforms, it signi-
fies that while they are out in public, they are representing the institution where they are learning. Because of
the dress code, the college's good reputation will be known by the community with ease. Thus, this is advan-
tageous for the college as well because it promotes your reputation. This is best demonstrated by my per-
sonal experience. My nephew attends a well-known school in Norway, and most of the time people can tell
where he attends school just by glancing at the costume. Therefore, wearing a uniform can aid in locating the
school. In fact, the school took notice of this promotion and enhanced the quality of the uniforms, making
them high-quality and very comfortable for students to wear. Surprisingly, this had a very positive impact, as
now all of the students would wear the correct school outfit, which not only looked fashionable but was also
extremely comfortable. I am sure if this change had not taken place, students would not be enthusiastic about
uniforms and would continue breaking school policies.
 
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that schools that provide students with good uniforms enhance discipline
levels. I feel this way because students will not spend as much time trying to find an outfit and will wear the
smart attire provided to them, and because schools have a higher chance of promotion by increasing enroll-
ments.